Focal Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Advances in image-guided brachytherapy have increased the interest in focal brachytherapy (F-BT) approaches to optimize disease control, while reducing the toxicities associated whole gland treatments for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study we performed a systematic review to report biochemical control (BC), and genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity rates in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with F-BT as a definitive or salvage modality.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This project was registered in the PROSPERO database (ID CRD42022320921). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Cochrane Central databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase Classic +Embase, and Medline ALL, all from the OvidSP platform and Web of Science from Clarivate, from each database's inception to July 2022. Search was restricted to English and included terms: focal brachytherapy/prostate cancer, partial brachytherapy/prostate cancer. In total, 14862 articles were identified. Manuscripts that not related to focal or partial prostate brachytherapy, review papers and studies not reporting BC were excluded. After eliminating duplicates, and studies deemed irrelevant by consensus among three independent reviewers, 44 articles remained for in-depth review and data extraction.

RESULTS

Thirty studies that included BC outcomes were included for this analysis, comprising 1556 patients treated with F-BT for PCa. Of these, 1094 (70%) and 462 (30%) underwent F-BT as definitive monotherapy or salvage, respectively; while 585 (38%) and 971 (62%) received HDR or LDR, respectively. For F-BT as monotherapy, the most commonly prescribed dose for HDR was 19 Gy in 1 fraction (range 19-24 Gy), and for LDR, 145 Gy (90-160Gy). Whereas for salvage F-BT, most common dose schedule of HDR was 19Gy in 1 fraction (19-27GY) and LDR 145Gy (144-145Gy). BC random effects estimate for F-BT monotherapy at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-years were 100% (P = 1.0), 96% (P = 0.45), 91% (P = 0.45) and 87% (P< 0.01), respectively. Whereas BC random effects estimate for salvage at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-years were 91% (P = 0.86), 68% (0.17), and 57% (P = 0.20), respectively. GI and GU grade 3-4 crude toxicity rates for monotherapy and salvage ranged from 0-3.33% and 0-17%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in F-BT approaches, both as monotherapy and in the salvage setting. BC and toxicity profiles of F-BT appear favorable, and future studies directly comparing with whole-gland treatments are warranted.

MR-Guided HDR Brachytherapy Boost in Localized Prostate Cancer - Results of a Phase II Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Dose escalation in localized prostate cancer using brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation (EBRT) has demonstrated improved biochemical control compared to EBRT alone. However, ultrasound guided LDR brachytherapy might be associated with increased GU toxicity. We report the results of a prospective study of MR-guided HDR brachytherapy (MRgHDR) in combination with EBRT for localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Intermediate- (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer patients were eligible. Patients received either 15Gy single fraction or 10Gy x 2 fractions using MRgHDR technique, followed by EBRT (37.5 Gy, [prostate only] -IR or 45-46 Gy - [prostate + pelvic nodes] -HR). Toxicity (CTCAE v4) and HRQoL (EPIC) were recorded at 1, 3 and 6 months, then at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used according to the appropriate disease risk category. Biochemical failure was defined according to Phoenix definition (nadir+2).

RESULTS

From 2010-2018, 120 patients were enrolled, 53 (44%) had IR and 67 (56%) had HR disease. Median age was 69 years (range, 46-78), median PSA was 12.1 ng/ml (3.2-148). ADT was used in 84 (70%) of patients, of whom 51 (60%) patients received <1 year and 33 (40%) received >1 year of ADT. A single fraction of 15Gy was given to 94 patients (78%) and the remaining 26 patients (22%) received 10Gy x 2 fractions. EBRT dose was 37.5Gy in 52 (43%) patients while 67 (56%) received 45-46Gy. One patient received only the first fraction of 10Gy, declined the second fraction and subsequently received 60Gy EBRT to the prostate. The median follow up was 58 months (11-134). Overall, 5-year biochemical control was 90% while it was 95% and 86% for IR and HR, respectively. At 5 years 7% patient had nodal or distant relapse or both. While the 5-yr distant control rates were 95% and 91% in the IR, HR, respectively. Acute grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity was 6.7% and 5% respectively. Acute toxicity trended back to baseline by 6 months in all patients except one. Late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI worst toxicity was seen in 10% and 4.2%, respectively. As with acute toxicity, late toxicity tended to improve over time. Only one patient experienced severe toxicity (Grade 3 GU - frequency) at 6 months but subsequently this resolved. HRQol will be reported separately.

CONCLUSION

MRgHDR brachytherapy boost in conjunction with EBRT provides comparable biochemical outcomes compared to the literature. Severe toxicity rates were minimal. Further follow-up will determine if these outcomes are sustained.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligo-Progressive Cancers: Results of the Randomized Phase II STOP Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In the metastatic setting, there is uncertain benefit to localized eradication of one or more lesions that are progressing despite systemic therapy. This randomized phase II trial examined if patients with ≤5 sites of oligoprogression benefited from the addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Eligibility criteria included age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, and oligoprogressive disease, defined as 1-5 lesions actively progressing while on systemic therapy. Patients were required to have at least 3 months of disease stability/response on systemic therapy prior to oligoprogression. After stratifying by type of systemic therapy (cytotoxic vs. non-cytotoxic), patients were randomized 2:1 to SABR to all progressing lesions plus SOC (SABR arm) vs. SOC alone (SOC arm). The trial began exclusive to non-small cell lung cancer but did not meet accrual goals and was expanded in 2019 to include all non-hematologic malignancies. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), lesional control, quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and duration of current systemic agent post-SABR.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and June 2021, 90 patients with 125 oligoprogressive metastases were enrolled across 8 Canadian institutions, with 59 patients randomized to SABR and 31 to SOC. Median age was 67 years (IQR: 61-73 years) and 39 (43%) were female. The most common primary sites were lung (44% of patients), genitourinary (23%) and breast (13%), with the most common oligo-progressive locations being lung (43%), bone (19%), lymph nodes (14%), and liver (13%). In the SABR arm, the most common fractionations were 35 Gy/5 (38% of lesions) and 50 Gy/5 (18%). Protocol adherence in the SOC arm was suboptimal: 3 patients (10%) withdrew immediately after randomization, and 7 additional patients (23%) received high-dose or ablative therapies. Median follow-up was 31 months. There was no difference in PFS between arms (median PFS 8.4 months in the SABR arm vs. 4.3 months in the SOC arm; however, the curves cross and 2-year PFS was 9% vs. 24% respectively, p = 0.91). Median OS was 31.2 months vs. 27.4 months, respectively (p = 0.22). Lesional control with SABR was 71% vs. 39% with SOC (p = 0.002). Median duration of post-randomization first-line systemic therapy was 10.3 months vs. 7.6 months, respectively (p = 0.71). Treatment was well-tolerated with 2 (3.4%) grade 3 treatment-related toxicities in the SABR arm and no grade 4/5 related events in either arm. QOL did not differ between arms.

CONCLUSION

Despite being a well-tolerated treatment providing superior lesional control, SABR for oligoprogression did not improve PFS or OS. Results may have been impacted by withdrawals and desire for ablative treatments on the SOC arm, and this lack of equipoise may make accrual to phase III trials difficult, although larger studies in select sub-populations are desired. (NCT02756793).

Outcomes of Head and Neck Cutaneous Angiosarcoma Treated in the IMRT Era

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Clinical behavior, natural history, and varied presentations of cutaneous angiosarcomas of the head and neck region (HN), in conjunction with its rarity, have rendered standardization of treatment elusive. We aimed to assess outcomes and patterns of failure for patients treated with surgery and radiation (Sx+RT), and radiation alone (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

A retrospective review of all HN angiosarcoma patients amenable for upfront Sx or RT in our institution between 2004-2018 was completed. Generally, treatment included Sx when feasible, and RT for large or extensive/ill-defined tumors. Demographic, tumor characteristics, local (LC), regional (RC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS), as well as patterns (in-field, marginal, out-of-field) of local failure at 5-year were estimated. Univariate analysis (UVA) was conducted to assess association with outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were eligible (14 Sx+RT and 19 RT). Tumor locations were: scalp (16, 48%). face (n = 12, 36%), and overlapping (5, 15%). Lesion types were: nodular (n = 23, 70%), flat (n = 4, 12%) and mixed (n = 6, 18%). Tumor size was larger in the RT group (median: 10.00 vs 2.85 cm, p<0.01). RT and Sx+RT patients had otherwise similar baseline characteristics: median age 74.3; male 70%; and ECOG performance status ≤1 85%. RT dose fractionations ranged from 50-70 Gy in 25-35 fractions in the RT group and 50-66 Gy in 25-33 fractions in the Sx+RT group. Four (12%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow up was 5.5 years. Five-year LC, RC, DC, and OS for RT vs Sx+RT groups were 68% vs 85% (p = 0.28); 95% vs 86% (p = 0.89); 79% vs 86% (p = 0.39); and 45% vs 55% (p = 0.71), respectively. The in-field/marginal/out-of-field local failure rate at 5 years were 16% vs 7% (p = 0.46), 26% vs 15% (p = 0.41), and 13% vs 0% (p = 0.24) for the RT vs Sx+RT groups, respectively. UVA showed that scalp location and ulceration/bleeding were strong adverse features for OS. Bone invasion was significantly associated with lower DC (Table). Lesion type (nodular/flat/mixed), tumor size, and treatment type (Sx+RT vs RT), were not significantly associated with LC or pattern of local failure.

CONCLUSION

Scalp tumors, as compared to face, portended poorer prognosis, and ulceration/bleeding and bone invasion were associated with increased distant metastases. Sx+RT was the preferred treatment modality when possible and typically used for smaller and better defined tumors. RT was reserved for larger and extensive/ill-defined disease; despite this, in the IMRT era, RT achieves reasonable rates of control, markedly superior to historical series.

Long-Term Biochemical Control of a Prospective Cohort of Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Interstitial Brachytherapy Versus Radical Prostatectomy

AIMS

To report long-term oncological outcomes of men treated prospectively as part of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group phase III Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial (SPIRIT) at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2003-2004, patients eligible for SPRIT attended a multidisciplinary educational session, following which they could choose radical prostatectomy, low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) or randomisation to SPIRIT. Biochemical failure was determined by the accepted definitions of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥0.2 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy and the Phoenix definition of PSA ≥2 ng/ml above the nadir after LDR-BT. A sensitivity analysis, using a PSA >0.5 ng/ml to define biochemical failure after LDR-BT and a threshold PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml, was carried out to test the robustness of the results. To account for the competing risk of death, Gray's test was used to test the equality of the cumulative incidence function of biochemical failure between treatment groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and prostate cancer-specific survival. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 156 patients, 100 received LDR-BT (15 after randomisation) and 56 underwent radical prostatectomy (15 after randomisation). The median follow-up was 12.6 and 14.7 years for LDR-BT and radical prostatectomy, respectively. The median age was 60 years; the median pre-treatment PSA was 5.5 (interquartile range 4.3-7.1). No significant differences in patient characteristics were found between groups. Two patients received adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. The cumulative incidence function of biochemical failure was 0%, 1.1% and 2.4% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, in the LDR-BT arm versus 8.5%, 15.8% and 15.8% in the radical prostatectomy arm (P < 0.001). These results were consistent when varying the definition of biochemical failure defined as PSA ≥0.5 ng/ml (P = 0.01). At 15 years, overall survival was higher in patients treated with radical prostatectomy compared with those treated with LDR-BT; however, no statistical difference was found in prostate cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

In low-risk prostate cancer patients, LDR-BT offers excellent long-term oncological outcomes comparable with radical prostatectomy, in addition to the previously reported advantage for LDR-BT in urinary and sexual quality of life domains and patient satisfaction.

O-311 Evaluating the Reproductive Potential of Azoospermic Men by Profiling the Genome of Surgically Retrieved Spermatozoa

Study question

Can whole exome sequencing of surgically retrieved spermatozoa from azoospermic men pinpoint mutations related to the etiology of their infertility and ability to support pregnancy?

Summary answer

Identifying key germline mutations involved in spermatogenesis helps explain reproductive failure, regardless of the etiology of the azoospermia.

What is known already

Azoospermia accounts for approximately 15% of male factor infertility cases. Although it can be caused by pre-testicular factors, the most recognized forms are testicular and post-testicular. Post-testicular azoospermia is mainly attributed to a mechanical obstruction, whereas testicular azoospermia, the most challenging form, is characterized by scattered functional germinal epithelia that may fail to support the meiotic process during sperm development. To elucidate the etiology of this condition, genetic studies on somatic cells have been carried out. Here, we perform whole exome sequencing (WES) on surgically retrieved spermatozoa to preferentially detect germline mutations that may be passed on to offspring.

Study design, size, duration

Over 3 years, we recruited patients undergoing epididymal sperm aspiration for acquired obstructive azoospermia (OA; n = 19) or testicular biopsy for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA; n = 11). Eight men were included as fertile controls. Copy number variants (CNVs) and gene mutation profiles were obtained through WES and compared between the OA and NOA cohorts, followed by sub-analyses within those two categories according to whether they generated a clinical pregnancy (fertile) or not (infertile), while controlling for maternal age.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Spermatozoal DNA was extracted and amplified from the surgically retrieved specimens (concentration, 742±520 ng/ul; quality, 1.7±0.1 nm). CNVs and gene mutations were detected using CLC Genomic Server 9.0. Genes were considered duplicated or deleted when the read depth was &gt;1.5 or &lt; 0.5 times the median read depth in the control. Common mutations were compared between the OA and NOA cohorts, as well as according to the couples’ clinical outcomes. Female partners had negative infertility workups.

Main results and the role of chance

Of 30 men (paternal age, 42.3±7yrs), 19 OA men underwent epididymal sperm retrievals (concentration, 1.1±4x106/ml, 9±12% motility), while 11 NOA men underwent testicular biopsies (concentration, 0.03±0.4x106/ml, 0.5±1% motility). WES did not indicate a significant difference in sperm aneuploidy between the two etiologies (OA, 1.7%; NOA, 1.8%) compared to the control (1.1%).

In OA patients, only 3 housekeeping-related genes were deleted, while in the NOA cohort, 5 genes involved in RNA transcription (POLR2L), apoptosis (AP5M1), and basic spermiogenic functions (AP1S2, AP1G2, APOE) were deleted.

OA patients and their partners (maternal age, 36.8±4yrs) underwent 19 ICSI cycles resulting in a delivery rate of 47.4% (9/19). Those able to reproduce (n = 9) shared a mutation in ZNF749, specifically affecting sperm production. The infertile men (n = 10) all shared a PRB1 deletion, controlling essential DNA replication.

NOA men and their partners (maternal age, 38.2±2yrs) underwent 11 ICSI cycles, yielding a delivery rate of 72.7% (8/11). The fertile men (n = 8) all shared a MPIG6B deletion, involved in stem cell lineage differentiation. All of their infertile counterparts (n = 3) presented gene deletions not only involved in spermato/spermio-genesis (n = 4) but, most importantly, also superimposed with those encoding early embryonic development (MBD5, CCAR1, PMEPA1, POLK, REC8, REPIN1, MAPRE3, ARL4C).  

Limitations, reasons for caution

Although maternal age was controlled for, confounding factors related to the female partner cannot entirely be excluded. While men unable to reproduce shared common gene mutations providing information about their condition, these findings still need to be confirmed in larger observations.

Wider implications of the findings

By performing WES, we were able to identify specific mutations associated with compromised embryo developmental competence of surgically retrieved spermatozoa. DNA sequencing technologies help identify gametes capable of sustaining a pregnancy even in the most severe form of male infertility, laying the groundwork for precision medicine in this field.

Trial registration number

N/A

0734 Does Noise Masking Improve Sleep Consolidation In Patients Weaning From Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation?

Introduction

Sound masking is a noise reduction strategy that adds a mixed-frequency blend of ambient sound to the environment and may improve sleep. Critically ill patients often cite noise as one of the main factors preventing sleep while they are cared for in an intensive care unit (ICU). The effect of sound masking on sleep in patients weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation is unknown.

Methods

12-hour overnight polysomnography was obtained in eight patients undergoing weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. None had hearing impairment, delirium, sedation or agitation. In random order, patients were exposed to sound masking half of the recording time. Noise events were defined a 10dB increase from baseline or any sound peak over 75dB. Arousals or awakenings were attributed to noise if they occurred within 5 seconds of the noise event.

Results

Environmental sound was 61.7± 0.9 dB (mean±SE) during sound masking and 55.9±1.4 dB during no sound masking. During sound masking, there were fewer sound events per hour of sleep when compared to no sound masking (4.1/hr vs 9.3/hr p=0.03). The percentage of sound events leading to a subsequent arousal or awakening with sound masking was less than during no sound masking:11% vs 22% (p=0.04). Arousal index and fragmentation index (arousal and awakenings/hr of sleep) were similar between the two conditions. In a post-study survey, five patients reported improved sleep quality with sound masking while the remaining three reported no difference.

Conclusion

Sound masking decreases sound-induced arousal from sleep in patients being weaned from prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Support

Veterans Administration Research Service

Boom boom pow: Shock-facilitated aqueous alteration and evidence for two shock events in the Martian nakhlite meteorites

Nakhlite meteorites are ~1.4 to 1.3 Ga old igneous rocks, aqueously altered on Mars ~630 Ma ago. We test the theory that water-rock interaction was impact driven. Electron backscatter diffraction demonstrates that the meteorites Miller Range 03346 and Lafayette were heterogeneously deformed, leading to localized regions of brecciation, plastic deformation, and mechanical twinning of augite. Numerical modeling shows that the pattern of deformation is consistent with shock-generated compressive and tensile stresses. Mesostasis within shocked areas was aqueously altered to phyllosilicates, carbonates, and oxides, suggesting a genetic link between the two processes. We propose that an impact ~630 Ma ago simultaneously deformed the nakhlite parent rocks and generated liquid water by melting of permafrost. Ensuing water-rock interaction focused on shocked mesostasis with a high density of reactive sites. The nakhlite source location must have two spatially correlated craters, one ~630 Ma old and another, ejecting the meteorites, ~11 Ma ago.

Beam Energy and Centrality Dependence of Direct-Photon Emission from Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

The PHENIX collaboration presents first measurements of low-momentum (0.4<p_{T}<3  GeV/c) direct-photon yields from Au+Au collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=39 and 62.4 GeV. For both beam energies the direct-photon yields are substantially enhanced with respect to expectations from prompt processes, similar to the yields observed in Au+Au collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200. Analyzing the photon yield as a function of the experimental observable dN_{ch}/dη reveals that the low-momentum (>1  GeV/c) direct-photon yield dN_{γ}^{dir}/dη is a smooth function of dN_{ch}/dη and can be well described as proportional to (dN_{ch}/dη)^{α} with α≈1.25. This scaling behavior holds for a wide range of beam energies at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the Large Hadron Collider, for centrality selected samples, as well as for different A+A collision systems. At a given beam energy, the scaling also holds for high p_{T} (>5  GeV/c), but when results from different collision energies are compared, an additional sqrt[s_{NN}]-dependent multiplicative factor is needed to describe the integrated-direct-photon yield.

Randomised Phase II Feasibility Trial of Image-guided External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (CCTG PR15/ NCT01982786)

AIMS

We conducted a multicentre feasibility study to assess the ability to randomise patients between image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and IGRT + high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost and to adhere to appropriate radiation quality assurance standards.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary end point was to determine the ability to randomise 60 patients over an 18 month period. Arm 1 (IGRT) patients received 78 Gy in 39 fractions or 60 Gy in 20 fractions (physician's preference), whereas arm 2 (IGRT + HDR) received 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions with HDR boost of 15 Gy. The secondary end points included >grade 3 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at 3 months, validation of a prospectively defined radiation oncology quality assurance to assess treatment compliance. All analyses were descriptive; no formal comparisons between treatment arms were carried out.

RESULTS

Between April 2014 and September 2015, 57 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were randomised between IGRT alone (arm 1; n = 29) and IGRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost (arm 2; n = 28). Overall, 93% received the treatment as randomised. There were four patients (one on IGRT arm 1 and three patients on the IGRT + HDR arm 2) who were treated differently from randomisation assignment. For the 29 patients receiving IGRT (arm 1), there were 14 cases reported with minor deviations and three with major deviations. For patients on IGRT + HDR (arm 2), there were 18 cases reported with minor deviations and two with major deviations. At 3 months in the IGRT group (arm 1), one patient reported grade 3 diarrhoea, whereas in the IGRT + HDR group (arm 2), two patients reported grade 3 haematuria. No other gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were reported.

CONCLUSION

The pilot study showed the feasibility of randomisation between treatment with IGRT alone versus IGRT + HDR boost. Treatment compliance was good, including adherence to quality assurance standards.