1
|
Franceschini D, Franzese C, Comito T, Ilieva MB, Spoto R, Marzo AM, Dominici L, Massaro M, Bellu L, Badalamenti M, Mancosu P, Scorsetti M. Definitive results of a prospective non-randomized phase 2 study on stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) for medically inoperable lung and liver oligometastases from breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2024:110240. [PMID: 38522597 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report mature results for local control and survival in oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on lung and/or liver lesions in a phase II trial. METHODS This is a prospective non-randomized phase II trial (NCT02581670) which enrolled patients from 2015 to 2021. Eligibility criteria included: age > 18 years, ECOG 0-2, diagnosis of breast cancer, maximum of 4 lung/liver lesions (with a maximum diameter < 5 cm), metastatic disease confined to the lungs and liver or extrapulmonary or extrahepatic disease stable or responding to systemic therapy. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicities. The secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS), poly-progression free survival (PPFS). RESULTS The study included 64 patients with a total of 90 lesions treated with SBRT. LC at 1 and 2 years was 94.9 %, 91 % at 3 years. Median local control was not reached. Median OS was 16.5 months, OS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 87.5 %, 60.9 % and 51.9 %, respectively. Median DMFS was 8.3 months, DMFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 38.1 %, 20.6 % and 16 % respectively. At univariate analysis, local response to SBRT was found to be statistically linked with better OS, DMFS and STFS. CONCLUSION SBRT is a safe and valid option in oligometastatic breast cancer patients, with very high rates of local control. An optimal selection of patients is likely needed to improve survival outcomes and reduce the rate of distant progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy.
| | - C Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - T Comito
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M B Ilieva
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - R Spoto
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - A M Marzo
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - L Dominici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M Massaro
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - L Bellu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M Badalamenti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - P Mancosu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franzese C, Lucchini R, Roghi M, Badalamenti M, Baldaccini D, Comito T, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Di Cristina L, Lo Faro L, Galdieri C, Reggiori G, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: The Role of Three-Dimensional Tumour Volume in Patient Survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e649-e656. [PMID: 37775459 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The definition of oligometastatic prostate cancer (OPCa) is currently based solely on the maximum number of detectable metastases, as there are no validated biomarkers available. The aim of this study was to identify novel predictive factors for OPCa patients who underwent metastases-directed therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This monocentre, retrospective study included consecutive OPCa patients with a maximum of five metastases in up to two organs, detected with choline- or PSMA-positron emission tomography, who were treated with metastases-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy. Endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression was carried out to evaluate the association between clinical factors and survival outcomes. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2021, 163 patients and 320 metastases were treated with 226 stereotactic body radiation therapy courses. The median three-dimensional metastatic tumour volume was 4.1 cm3, with a range from 0.01 to 233.4 cm3. In total, 87 (53.4%), 21 (12.9%) and 55 (33.7%) metastases were classified as cN1, cM1a and cM1b, respectively. The median follow-up was 28.5 months. The rates of overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 83.4-93.4), 74.9% (95% confidence interval 66.1-81.7) and 57.2% (95% confidence interval 45.8-67.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that overall survival reduced with the increase in three-dimensional total tumour volume (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.52; P = 0.030) and confirmed a significant difference between cN1 versus cM1a-b disease (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.25; P = 0.046). The cut-off value of total volume correlated with the highest risk of death was 20 cm3 (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.34-4.18; P = 0.003). The median progression-free survival was 17.8 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year rates of 63.7% (95% confidence interval 55.4-70.9), 31.5% (95% confidence interval 22.8-40.6) and 24.7% (95% confidence interval 16.0-34.3). CONCLUSIONS This study identified three-dimensional total tumour volume and the site of oligometastases as significant predictors of survival in OPCa patients treated with metastases-directed therapy. These parameters can potentially be used to personalised treatment and improve patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy.
| | - R Lucchini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Roghi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Badalamenti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - D Baldaccini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - T Comito
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - D Franceschini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - P Navarria
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - L Di Cristina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - L Lo Faro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - C Galdieri
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - G Reggiori
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - S Tomatis
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franzese C, Badalamenti M, Teriaca A, De Virgilio A, Mercante G, Cavina R, Ferrari D, Santoro A, Spriano G, Scorsetti M. Metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of oligometastatic head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:1307-1313. [PMID: 33471186 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03518-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recently major efforts have been made to define the oligometastatic setting, but for head and neck cancer (HNC) limited data are available. We aimed to evaluate outcome of oligometastatic HNC treated with Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as metastasis-directed therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed patients treated with SBRT on a maximum of five oligometastases from HNC, in up to two organs. Concomitant treatment was allowed. End points were toxicity, local control of treated metastases (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 48 consecutive patients and 71 lesions were treated. With a follow-up of 20.2 months, most common primary tumors were larynx (29.2%) and salivary glands (29.2%), while common site of metastases was lung (59.1%). Median dose was 48 Gy (21-75) in 3-8 fractions. Treatment was well tolerated, with two patients reporting mild pain and nausea. LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 83.1% and 70.2%. Previous local therapy (HR 4.97; p = 0.002), oligoprogression (HR 4.07; p = 0.031) and untreated metastases (HR 4.19; p = 0.027) were associated with worse LC. PFS at 1 and 2 years were 42.2% and 20.0%. Increasing age (HR 1.03; p = 0.010), non-adenoid cystic carcinoma (HR 2.57; p = 0.034) and non-lung metastases (HR 2.20; p = 0.025) were associated with worse PFS. One- and 2-years OS were 81.0% and 67.1%. Worse performance status (HR 2.91; p = 0.049), non-salivary primary (HR 19.9; p = 0.005), non-lung metastases (HR 2.96; p = 0.040) were correlated with inferior OS. CONCLUSIONS SBRT can be considered a safe metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic HNC. Efficacy of the treatment seems to be higher when administered upfront in the management of metastatic disease; however, selection of patients need to be improved due to the relevant risk of appearance of new metastatic site after SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy. .,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Badalamenti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - A Teriaca
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - A De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - G Mercante
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - R Cavina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - D Ferrari
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Presidio Ospedaliero San Paolo, Milan, Italy
| | - A Santoro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - G Spriano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.,Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Humanitas University, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|