Effectiveness of extracellular vesicles derived from hiPSCs in repairing hyperoxia-induced injury in a fetal murine lung explant model

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in neonatal care, the incidence of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) remains high among preterm infants. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have shown promise in repairing injury in animal BPD models. Evidence suggests they exert their effects via paracrine mechanisms. We aim herein to assess the effectiveness of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from hiPSCs and their alveolar progenies (diPSCs) in attenuating hyperoxic injury in a preterm lung explant model.

METHODS

Murine lung lobes were harvested on embryonic day 17.5 and maintained in air-liquid interface. Following exposure to 95% O2 for 24 h, media was supplemented with 5 × 106 particles/mL of EVs isolated from hiPSCs or diPSCs by size-exclusion chromatography. On day 3, explants were assessed using Hematoxylin-Eosin staining with mean linear intercept (MLI) measurements, immunohistochemistry, VEGFa and antioxidant gene expression. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Multiple Comparison Test. EV proteomic profiling was performed, and annotations focused on alveolarization and angiogenesis signaling pathways, as well as anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and regenerative pathways.

RESULTS

Exposure of fetal lung explants to hyperoxia induced airspace enlargement, increased MLI, upregulation of anti-oxidants Prdx5 and Nfe2l2 with decreased VEGFa expression. Treatment with hiPSC-EVs improved parenchymal histologic changes. No overt changes in vasculature structure were observed on immunohistochemistry in our in vitro model. However, VEGFa and anti-oxidant genes were upregulated with diPSC-EVs, suggesting a pro-angiogenic and cytoprotective potential. EV proteomic analysis provided new insights in regard to potential pathways influencing lung regeneration.

CONCLUSION

This proof-of-concept in vitro study reveals a potential role for hiPSC- and diPSC-EVs in attenuating lung changes associated with prematurity and oxygen exposure. Our findings pave the way for a novel cell free approach to prevent and/or treat BPD, and ultimately reduce the global burden of the disease.

Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry: Short-Term Kidney Status and Variation in Care

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to characterize short-term kidney status and describe variation in early care utilization in a multicenter cohort of patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) and nephritis.

METHODS

We analyzed previously collected prospective data from North American patients with cSLE with kidney biopsy-proven nephritis enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry from March 2017 through December 2019. We determined the proportion of patients with abnormal kidney status at the most recent registry visit and applied generalized linear mixed models to identify associated factors. We also calculated frequency of medication use, both during induction and ever recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 222 patients with kidney biopsy-proven nephritis, with 64% class III/IV nephritis on initial biopsy. At the most recent registry visit at median (interquartile range) of 17 (8-29) months from initial kidney biopsy, 58 of 106 patients (55%) with available data had abnormal kidney status. This finding was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.21-12.46) and age at cSLE diagnosis (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.49). Patients with class IV nephritis were more likely than class III to receive cyclophosphamide and rituximab during induction. There was substantial variation in mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab ever use patterns across rheumatology centers.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort with predominately class III/IV nephritis, male sex and older age at cSLE diagnosis were associated with abnormal short-term kidney status. We also observed substantial variation in contemporary medication use for pediatric lupus nephritis between pediatric rheumatology centers. Additional studies are needed to better understand the impact of this variation on long-term kidney outcomes.

Waterborne infections in haemato-oncology units - a narrative review

Bone marrow transplant and haemato-oncology patients are at risk of healthcare associated infections due to waterborne pathogens. We undertook a narrative review of waterborne outbreaks in haemato-oncology patients from 2000-2022. Databases searched included Pubmed, DARE and CDSR and were undertaken by two authors. We analysed the organisms implicated, sources identified and infection prevention and control strategies implemented. The most commonly implicated pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, non-tuberculous mycobacteria and Legionella pneumophila. Bloodstream infection was the most common clinical presentation. The majority of incidents employed multimodal strategies to achieve control, addressing both the water source and routes of transmission. This review highlights the risk to haemato-oncology patients from waterborne pathogens and discusses future preventative strategies and the requirement for new UK guidance for haemato-oncology units.

Measurement of changes in uterine and fibroid volume during treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB)

STUDY QUESTION

Does application of an unbiased method for analysis of magnetic resonance (MR) images reveal any effect on uterine or fibroid volume from treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) with three 12-week courses of the selective progesterone receptor modulator ulipristal acetate (SPRM-UPA)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Application of an unbiased method for analysis of MR images showed that treatment of HMB with SPRM-UPA was not associated with a significant reduction in the volume of the uterus or in the volume of uterine fibroids.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

SPRM-UPA shows therapeutic efficacy for treating HMB. However, the mechanism of action (MoA) is not well understood and there have been mixed reports, using potentially biased methodology, regarding whether SPRM-UPA has an effect on the volume of the uterus and fibroids.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

In a prospective clinical study (with no comparator), 19 women with HMB were treated over a period of 12 months with SPRM-UPA and uterine and fibroid size were assessed with high resolution structural MRI and stereology.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

A cohort of 19 women aged 38-52 years (8 with and 11 without fibroids) were treated with three 12-week courses of 5 mg SPRM-UPA given daily, with four weeks off medication in-between treatment courses. Unbiased estimates of the volume of uterus and total volume of fibroids were obtained at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months of treatment, by using the Cavalieri method of modern design-based stereology in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Bland-Altman plots showed good intra-rater repeatability and good inter-rater reproducibility for measurement of the volume of both fibroids and the uterus. For the total patient cohort, two-way ANOVA did not show a significant reduction in the volume of the uterus after two or three treatment courses of SPRM-UPA (P = 0.51), which was also the case when the groups of women with and without fibroids were considered separately (P = 0.63). One-way ANOVA did not show a significant reduction in total fibroid volume in the eight patients with fibroids (P = 0.17).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study has been performed in a relatively small cohort of women and simulations that have subsequently been performed using the acquired data have shown that for three time points and a group size of up to 50, with alpha (Type I Error) and beta (Type II Error) set to 95% significance and 80% power, respectively, at least 35 patients would need to be recruited in order for the null hypothesis (that there is no significant reduction in total fibroid volume) to be potentially rejected.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The imaging protocol that we have developed represents a generic paradigm for measuring the volume of the uterus and uterine fibroids that can be readily incorporated in future studies of medical treatments of HMB. In the present study, SPRM-UPA failed to produce a significant reduction in the volume of the uterus or the total volume of fibroids (which were present in approximately half of the patients) after either two or three 12-week courses of treatment. This finding represents a new insight in respect of the management of HMB using treatment strategies that target hormone-dependence.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The UPA Versus Conventional Management of HMB (UCON) trial was funded by the EME Programme (Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)) (12/206/52). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, or Department of Health and Social Care.Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre grants to the Centre for Reproductive Health (CRH) (G1002033 and MR/N022556/1) are also gratefully acknowledged. H.C. has clinical research support for laboratory consumables and staff from Bayer AG and provides consultancy advice (All paid to Institution) for Bayer AG, PregLem SA, Gedeon Richter, Vifor Pharma UK Ltd, AbbVie Inc., and Myovant Sciences GmbH. H.C. has received royalties from UpToDate for an article on abnormal uterine bleeding. L.W. has received grant funding from Roche Diagnostics (Paid to Institution). All other authors have no conflicts to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study reported here is an embedded mechanism of action study (no comparator) within the UCON clinical trial (registration ISRCTN: 20426843).

2022 cancer statistics: Focus on lung cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This is a plain language summary of a medical journal article called 'Cancer statistics, 2022'. The data in this summary provides detailed information about lung cancer and less detailed information about other cancers. The researchers from the original study used data gathered from previous years to produce a cancer forecast, predicting the number of new cancer diagnoses and deaths in the United States in 2022.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

The review of the data up to 2019 found that compared to previous years: Advanced lung cancer diagnoses had decreased Local stage lung cancer diagnoses had increased Deaths had slowed for lung cancer Deaths continued to reduce for breast cancer, but the rate of this reduction had slowed down Female breast cancer diagnoses were slowly increasing each year Prostate cancer diagnoses stayed similar Local stage prostate cancer diagnoses stayed similar Advanced prostate cancer diagnoses had increased each year The researchers estimated that over 1.9 million new cancer cases would be diagnosed and over half a million cancer deaths would occur in the United States in 2022. This figure includes approximately 350 deaths per day from lung cancer, which was found to be the leading cause of cancer death in the United States.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?

The study found that progress in reducing the number of people being diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer has stalled. Although there were fewer lung cancers diagnosed, this reduction was likely caused by changes in screening and advancements in lung cancer treatments. The American Cancer Society recommended that investing more funds in detecting cancers early as well as developing targeted treatments would help to reduce cancer death rates. This would also help to address the differences in access to cancer care that exist based on racial, social and economic inequalities.

Plain language summary and patient perspective of the revised STARS study: long-term results of a study that compared the effectiveness of radiotherapy to surgery in people with non-small-cell lung cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This is a summary of a research study called revised STARS. The STARS study involved people with non-small-cell lung cancer, also known as NSCLC. The cancer was less than 5 cm in size and had not spread to other parts of the body (known as stage 1 cancer). The study compared the effectiveness of surgery versus a type of radiotherapy treatment, called stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (also known as SABR) as a treatment for people with NSCLC. Researchers wanted to find out how likely people were to be alive after treatment or if their cancer had grown or spread to other parts of their body (also known as progressed).

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

The study found that the long term outcomes were similar between SABR and surgery. People with NSCLC were as likely to be alive 3 years after treatment with SABR compared to surgery.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?

SABR may be an alternative to surgery for people with stage 1 NSCLC which is less than 5 cm in size and has not spread to other parts of the body Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02357992 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Plain language summary and patient perspective of the American Society for Clinical Oncology guideline: management of stage 3 non-small-cell lung cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This is a plain language summary of a guideline on the management of stage 3 non-small-cell lung cancer, also known as NSCLC. This guideline was written by the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO for short) and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

WHY WERE THE GUIDELINES DEVELOPED?

The purpose of the ASCO guideline is to provide recommendations to healthcare professionals in the US including oncologists, surgeons, pathologists, radiologists, and nurses on how best to diagnose and treat people with stage 3 NSCLC.

HOW WERE THE GUILDEINES DEVELOPED?

The ASCO guideline is based on the latest research and scientific evidence to make certain the recommendations are up to date and based on reliable data and best practice. In 2021, a group of experts were asked by ASCO to form an Expert Panel. The Expert Panel reviewed the results of 127 clinical research studies on NSCLC that were done between 1990 and 2021. They looked at how NSCLC had been diagnosed and treated in these studies, as well as at patients' survival and quality of life. The Expert Panel used these findings and their own expertise to form their recommendations and produce the 2021 ASCO Guideline called 'Management of Stage 3 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline'.

WHAT INFORMATION DOES THE GUIDELINE CONTAIN?

The guideline aims to answer the following questions: What are the most precise ways to confirm and stage NSCLC in people suspected of having a stage 3 disease? Which patients with stage 3 NSCLC can be treated most successfully with surgery? Which patients who can be treated with surgery could also have an additional therapy before their surgery? Which patients who can be treated with surgery could also have an additional treatment after their surgery? Which treatment and/or management is most suitable for patients who cannot have surgery?

Plain language summary and patient perspective of the European Society for Medical Oncology expert consensus statements on treating EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This article provides a plain language summary and patient perspective of a new set of recommendations made by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO for short). These recommendations are also called expert consensus statements. They cover the management of people with a type of lung cancer called epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EGFR-positive NSCLC for short).

WHY WERE THE RECOMMENDATIONS DEVELOPED?

The ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines are used by healthcare professionals when treating people with cancer, but they don't necessarily have all the information healthcare professionals need to make decisions for with people with EGFR-positive NSCLC. So, in 2021, 32 healthcare professionals who are experts in treating people with EGFR-positive NSCLC worked together to produce recommendations to fill these gaps about EGFR-positive NSCLC. This was called a consensus-building process and it also included patient advocates.

WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS DID THEY MAKE?

The experts discussed four main topics including how people with different stages of EGFR-positive NSCLC are diagnosed and treated, and how clinical studies are done. They reviewed the scientific information that exists on these subjects. They reached an agreement and developed the recommendations that are summarized here.

Plain language summary and patient perspective of the 2020 lung cancer screening recommendations by the US Preventive Services Task Force

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This summary describes the research carried out by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF for short) during a review and update of their lung cancer screening recommendations made in 2013. The USPSTF reviewed the results of clinical studies that used a type of scan called low dose computed tomography (LDCT for short). They wanted to see how successful LDCT was at finding lung cancers in people ho hadn't shown any physical signs of lung cancer, but had a history of smoking and were over 50 years of age.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

The review found that performing yearly LDCT scans in people who are at high risk of developing lung cancer is beneficial, as it means that some patients will be diagnosed earlier than they would be without this type of screening. People considered to be at high risk of developing lung cancer include: Adults aged 50 to 80 years who have smoked a pack of 20 cigarettes per day for 20 years or two packs per day for 10 years; OR Adults aged 50 to 80 years who currently smoke or have stopped smoking within the last 15 years.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?

The information gained from reviewing the research enabled the USPSTF to update their lung cancer screening recommendations.

Intraarticular steroids as DMARD-sparing agents for juvenile idiopathic arthritis flares: Analysis of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry

BACKGROUND

Children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who achieve a drug free remission often experience a flare of their disease requiring either intraarticular steroids (IAS) or systemic treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). IAS offer an opportunity to recapture disease control and avoid exposure to side effects from systemic immunosuppression. We examined a cohort of patients treated with IAS after drug free remission and report the probability of restarting systemic treatment within 12 months.

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of patients from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry who received IAS for a flare after a period of drug free remission. Historical factors and clinical characteristics and of the patients including data obtained at the time of treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of those with follow up data available 49% had restarted systemic treatment 6 months after IAS injection and 70% had restarted systemic treatment at 12 months. The proportion of patients with prior use of a biologic DMARD was the only factor that differed between patients who restarted systemic treatment those who did not, both at 6 months (79% vs 35%, p < 0.01) and 12 months (81% vs 33%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

While IAS are an option for all patients who flare after drug free remission, it may not prevent the need to restart systemic treatment. Prior use of a biologic DMARD may predict lack of success for IAS. Those who previously received methotrexate only, on the other hand, are excellent candidates for IAS.

Obesity and Adipose Tissue Dysfunction: From Pediatrics to Adults

Obesity is a growing health problem that affects both children and adults. The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity is associated with comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome due to chronic low-grade inflammation present at early stages of the disease. In pediatric patients suffering from obesity, the role of epigenetics, the gut microbiome and intrauterine environment have emerged as causative factors Interestingly, pediatric obesity is strongly associated with low birth weight. Accelerated weight gain oftentimes occurs in these individuals during the post-natal period, which can lead to increased risk of adiposity and metabolic disease. The pathophysiology of obesity is complex and involves biological and physiological factors compounded by societal factors such as family and community. On a cellular level, adipocytes contained within adipose tissue become dysregulated and further contribute to development of comorbidities similar to those present in adults with obesity. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of adipose tissue immune, inflammatory and metabolic adaptation of the adipose tissue in obesity. Early cellular changes as well as the role of immune cells and inflammation on the progression of disease in pivotal pediatric clinical trials, adult studies and mouse models are emphasized. Understanding the initial molecular and cellular changes that occur during obesity can facilitate new and improved treatments aimed at early intervention and subsequent prevention of adulthood comorbidities.

Bayesian emulation and history matching of JUNE

We analyze JUNE: a detailed model of COVID-19 transmission with high spatial and demographic resolution, developed as part of the RAMP initiative. JUNE requires substantial computational resources to evaluate, making model calibration and general uncertainty analysis extremely challenging. We describe and employ the uncertainty quantification approaches of Bayes linear emulation and history matching to mimic JUNE and to perform a global parameter search, hence identifying regions of parameter space that produce acceptable matches to observed data, and demonstrating the capability of such methods. This article is part of the theme issue 'Technical challenges of modelling real-life epidemics and examples of overcoming these'.

Bayesian emulation and history matching of JUNE

We analyze JUNE: a detailed model of COVID-19 transmission with high spatial and demographic resolution, developed as part of the RAMP initiative. JUNE requires substantial computational resources to evaluate, making model calibration and general uncertainty analysis extremely challenging. We describe and employ the uncertainty quantification approaches of Bayes linear emulation and history matching to mimic JUNE and to perform a global parameter search, hence identifying regions of parameter space that produce acceptable matches to observed data, and demonstrating the capability of such methods. This article is part of the theme issue 'Technical challenges of modelling real-life epidemics and examples of overcoming these'.

P-280 Potential for improvement and current limitations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for embryo selection: analysis of external validation data

Study question

What are the prospects of improvement and the limitations of an AI system for embryo selection?

Summary answer

The predictive performance of AI can be enhanced by including additional factors, on top of embryo images, and by assessing images with centered blastocysts.

What is known already

We previously reported the external validation of IVFvision.ai, an AI algorithm that differentiates between Day-5 blastocysts with a positive or negative implantation outcome. IVFvision.ai had higher AUC and overall accuracy in predicting implantation compared to KIDScoreD5 and senior embryologists. Here we report a secondary analysis of external validation data, focusing on a) the improvement of the predictive ability of IVFvision.ai by incorporating data from additional sources, and b) the impact of the blastocyst image quality on the performance of IVFvision.ai.

Study design, size, duration

This is a secondary analysis of external validation data. External validation of IVFvision.ai was performed at a University IVF Clinic using 113 anonymised Embryoscope images of single D5 blastocyst transfers with known implantation outcome.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

The performance of IVFvision.ai and three senior Embryologists to correctly classify blastocysts according to implantation outcome were compared in images in which the whole blastocyst was visible (centred blastocysts, n = 62) vs images in which part of the blastocyst was not visible (off-centred blastocysts, n = 51). Logistic regression models were created: a) IVFvision alone, b) IVFvision+age, c) IVFvision+fertilisation_method, d) IVFvision+KIDScoreD5, e) IVFvision+age+Fertilisation_method+KIDScoreD5. The AUC of each model in predicting implantation was estimated using ROC curve analysis.

Main results and the role of chance

The AUC of IVFVision.ai (0.675 vs 0.432), Embryologist 1 (0.570 vs 0.390), Embryologist 2 (0.663 vs 0.448) and Embryologist 3 (0.628 vs 0.485) were higher for images with centered blastocysts compared to non-centered blastocysts, respectively. There was a progressive increase of AUC with the addition of more factors in the predictive models. a) IVFvision alone: AUC=0.675, b) IVFvision+age: AUC=0.675 c) IVFvision+KIDScoreD5: AUC=0.721 d) IVFvision+fertilisation_method=0.740, e) IVFvision+age+Fertilisation_method+KIDScoreD5=0.768.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The retrospective nature of the study and the small sample of the study raise the need for further prospective studies with a larger number of embryos.

Wider implications of the findings

The highest performance of IVFvision.ai is achieved in images with centred blastocysts, suggesting that implantation cannot be predicted accurately in images with non-centred blastocysts. In addition, we provide provide proof of concept that training AI systems using data from different sources, in addition to embryo images, may increase overall accuracy.

Trial registration number

not applicable

Hidden in plain sight? Identifying patient-authored publications

BACKGROUND

Patient advocates are increasingly authoring peer-reviewed publications that could enhance patient care and understanding of the lived experience. Although patient authorship may be seen as an innovation in the peer-reviewed publication environment and some may not be aware of or accept patient authorship, we know patient-authored publications exist. However, identifying patient-authored publications is often challenging and time-consuming.

MAIN BODY

In this commentary, we propose a definition for a patient author and patient-authored publications. We outline factors driving the increase in patient authorship, including patient interest, recognition of the value of including the patient voice and major funders recognising the importance of involving patient advocates in research. Evidence and experience-based guidance on patient authorship is emerging, and we highlight practical guidance for patient advocates on authoring peer-reviewed publications. To gain a better understanding of patient authorship, an efficient method is needed to identify patient-authored publications. A dataset on patient-authored publications could be used for a range of quantitative and qualitative research studies. The affiliation search function in PubMed can provide an easy, and reproducible way to identify a dataset of patient-authored publications in the international peer-reviewed literature, but only if patient authors include a standard metatag, (e.g. Patient Author) as one of their listed affiliations, combined with other affiliations as appropriate. From 2020 to 2021, there was a nine-fold increase in patient-authored publications in PubMed identified using the Patient Author tag. We recognize that terminology can be contentious and some authors may prefer alternative metatags. Further efforts are required to gain consensus on a suitable, standard metatag or set of metatags to use to show the true extent of patient authorship.

CONCLUSION

Patient authorship is not only legitimate, but it also exemplifies the principles of diversity, equity and inclusion. Stakeholders in the publication community need to review their policies and procedures to identify and address barriers to patient authorship. Patient advocates, funders, researchers and publishers could all help to promote awareness and acceptance of patient authorship and the merits of using a standard metatag or set of metatags, so that patient-authored publications are no longer hidden in plain sight.

Social determinants of health influence disease activity and functional disability in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDH) greatly influence outcomes during the first year of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis, a disease similar to polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA). We investigated the correlation of community poverty level and other SDH with the persistence of moderate to severe disease activity and functional disability over the first year of treatment in pJIA patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry.

METHODS

In this cohort study, unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear mixed effects models analyzed the effect of community poverty and other SDH on disease activity, using the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score-10, and disability, using the Child Health Assessment Questionnaire, measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred eighty-four patients were identified. High community poverty (≥20% living below the federal poverty level) was associated with increased odds of functional disability (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.28-2.60) but was not statistically significant after adjustment (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.81-1.86) and was not associated with increased disease activity. Non-white race/ethnicity was associated with higher disease activity (aOR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.41-4.36). Lower self-reported household income was associated with higher disease activity and persistent functional disability. Public insurance (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.29) and low family education (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.14-3.12) was associated with persistent functional disability.

CONCLUSION

High community poverty level was associated with persistent functional disability in unadjusted analysis but not with persistent moderate to high disease activity. Race/ethnicity and other SDH were associated with persistent disease activity and functional disability.

Oral vaccination of dogs with a monovalent live-avirulent vaccine confers 1 year of immunity against Bordetella bronchiseptica challenge

This experimental challenge study assessed immune protection 1 year after a single dose of live-attenuated oral Bordetella bronchiseptica (Bb) vaccine in dogs. Forty Bb-seronegative 7-9-week-old puppies were randomly assigned at Day 0 to receive a single oral dose of either Bb vaccine (n = 20; vaccinated group) or sterile water (n = 20; control group). Groups were housed separately until comingling 1 day pre-challenge (Day 365). Challenge with virulent aerosolized Bb occurred at Day 366. Clinical scores were obtained at Days 1-7, and 366-380. Bb microagglutination test (MAT) titers were obtained at Days -7, 0, monthly post-vaccination, and Days 358, 365, and 380. Nasal swabs were collected for microbiological assessment at Days -7, 0, 365, and 367-380. Oral Bb vaccination was not associated with side effects. Pre-challenge, vaccinated dogs developed persistent Bb MAT titers and control dogs remained seronegative. Post-challenge, duration of cough was longer in control dogs (least square means [LSM], 8.6 days) than vaccinated dogs (LSM, 1.5 days; P < 0.0001), with more control dogs having cough on 2 or more consecutive days (control group, n = 17/19, 89.5%; vaccinated group, n = 3/19, 15.8%; P = 0.0011). Post-challenge, Bb shedding occurred in all control dogs and 5/19 (26%) vaccinated dogs. Average duration of Bb shedding was longer in the control group (11.9 days vs. 0.6 days; P < 0.0001) and nasal Bb loads were higher in the control group (P < 0.00001). Orally administered Bb vaccine stimulated immunity that was still protective against virulent Bb challenge after 1 year.

Bone turnover markers as determinants of bone density and fracture in men with distal forearm fractures: the pathogenesis examined in the Mr F study

The pathogenesis for low-trauma wrist fractures in men is not fully understood. This study found that these men had evidence of significantly higher bone turnover compared with control subjects. Bone turnover markers were negative predictors of bone mineral density and were a predictor of fracture.

INTRODUCTION

Men with distal forearm fractures have reduced bone density, an increased risk of osteoporosis and of further fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not men with distal forearm fractures had evidence of altered bone turnover activity.

METHODS

Fifty eight men with low-trauma distal forearm fracture and 58 age-matched healthy control subjects were recruited. All subjects underwent a DXA scan of the forearm, both hips, and lumbar spine, biochemical investigations, and health questionnaires. Measurements of beta crosslaps (βCTX), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), sclerostin, Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF 23) were made.

RESULTS

Men with fracture had significantly higher PINP than controls at 39.2 ng/ml (SD 19.5) versus 33.4 ng/ml (SD13.1) (p<0.001). They also had significantly higher βCTX at 0.45 ng/ml (SD 0.21) versus 0.37 ng/ml (SD 0.17) (p= 0.037). Fracture subjects had significantly lower aBMD and PINP was a negative predictor of aBMD at the total hip and βCTX a negative predictor of forearm aBMD. Sclerostin was a positive predictor of aBMD at the lumbar spine and hip sites. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) at 37nmol/L (SD 15.0) was lower in fracture cohort compared to 47.9 nmol/L (SD 19.2) (p=0.001) in control. Multiple regression revealed that the best model for prediction of fracture included SHBG, P1NP, and ultra-distal forearm aBMD. The likelihood of distal forearm fracture was decreased by 5.1% for each nmol/L increase in SHBH and by 1.4% for every mg/cm² increase in ultra-distal forearm aBMD, but increased by 6.1 % for every ng/ml increase in P1NP. Men in the highest quartile of PINP had a significantly greater likelihood of distal forearm fracture than those in the lowest quartile.

CONCLUSION

The fracture group had significantly higher PINP and βCTX compared with the control group, and these markers were negative predictors of aBMD at the total hip and forearm sites, respectively. Sclerostin was a positive predictor of the variance of spinal and hip aBMD. Likelihood of forearm fracture was best predicted by a combination of SHBG, PINP, and ultra-distal forearm aBMD. Findings of such cross-sectional data should be treated with caution, as longitudinal studies would be required to confirm or refute them.

1037 Early Detection and Management of Preoperative Anaemia in An Elective Vascular Surgery Cohort

Introduction

Iron deficiency anaemia is the most common cause of anaemia in the surgical population. Patients receiving transfusions during major surgery encounter more adverse outcomes compared to those that do not, indicating the early management of pre-operative anemia is likely to reduce major surgical patient morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have demonstrated that 33% of patients undergoing major vascular surgery operations are anaemic (haemaglobin, Hb, &lt;130g/L).

Aim

We aim to reduce the proportion of anaemic patients undergoing major vascular surgery by 50%.

Method

A point-of-care HemoCue machine was used to measure Hb in patients who were referred for elective major surgery in 11 vascular clinics. Patients with Hb &lt; 130g/L were prescribed a 1-month course of Ferrous Sulfate (200mg TDS), and a letter was sent to their GP requesting iron function tests. Post-intervention Hb levels were rechecked following the preoperative anaesthetics review.

Results

11 patients were referred for major surgery, of which 4 were identified as anaemic (36%). The mean Hb concentration was 121.3g/L, which increased to 137.3g/L following oral iron therapy. The mean duration of follow up was 36 days (range 0-94 days).

Conclusions

The implementation of a HemoCue machine to identify and manage preoperative anaemia was successful in our pilot study. Further work should include full integration of our pathway into current vascular clinics without student support. This will enable evaluation of the impact of our intervention on a wider scale.

423 Patient Perspective on the Use of the Independent Sector to Maintain Elective NHS Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction

COVID-19 resulted in the suspension of planned treatments for patients worldwide leaving millions suffering the physical and mental effects of delay. Reports indicate that when services have been re-established, patients have been afraid to take up appointments. Hospitals put processes in place to counter this, notably separating emergency and elective patient cohorts. Most notably seen by the co-operation between the NHS and independent private healthcare providers in March 2020 at the height of the pandemic. We undertook a study to ascertain the perceptions of NHS patients who underwent elective treatment at independent ‘cold’ sites during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method

A cross-sectional study with structured telephone interviews of patients who had planned elective treatments at ‘cold’ independent hospitals between March and September 2020. 1150 patients were identified, and a 20% sample formed a 230 patient study group, with 158 (70%) agreeing to participate.

Results

30% of patients delayed their treatment due to COVID related concerns, with 76% of these only accepting treatment because this was at a ‘cold’ site. 46% of patients perceived treatment at a ‘cold’ site as the most important factor contributing to their safety. 153 patients (97%) supported the paid arrangement between the NHS and the independent sector to provide separate ‘cold’ sites for elective treatments.

Discussion

Safely restarting elective services to allow important planned treatments to take place, as was the pandemic continues, is a priority. Our study indicates that physical separation of patient pathways impacted most on patient confidence, and that the use of ‘cold’ sites is a viable option.