Evaluation of a National Radiation Oncology Research and Mentorship Program

PURPOSE

The XXX Annual Scientific Meeting Medical Student Research and Mentorship Award (XXX ASM MSRMA) was established in 2020 to support medical students pursuing radiation oncology (RO) research and RO as a career. This study is an evaluation of the impact of this national research and mentorship award on medical students, resident mentors, and research supervisors over three iterations.

METHODS

Three separate surveys were created for: medical student mentees, RO resident mentors, and attending research supervisors. These surveys were developed using best practice strategies for medical education surveys and circulated for peer-review amongst experts in oncology medical education. The surveys were sent to the 52 individuals (18 students, 18 residents, 16 supervisors) who participated in 3 cycles of XXX ASM MSRMA (2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23). After anonymization, quantitative answers were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative responses were evaluated using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

There was a 90% survey response rate. For medical student mentees, the award maintained (71%) or increased (24%) interest in pursuing an RO career. Students reported receiving helpful tips for residency applications and insight into RO residency, research, and career planning advice. Only the first student cohort currently has matching results for residency with approximately 50% matching to RO. All resident mentor respondents felt the program either maintained or increased motivation to mentor students in RO. Research project supervisors unanimously enjoyed their role in this program and would recommend and participate in this program again.

CONCLUSIONS

A national research and mentorship award for medical students has shown a positive impact on participants. Medical students felt this award program motivated them to continue pursuing oncology research and a potential career in RO. The program also enhanced mentorship skills in residents and research supervisors, which encourages further RO mentorship, teaching, and exposure for future generations of students.

Efficacy of the Rehabilitation Planning Consult for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Survivors of head and neck cancer may have significant lasting impairments and poor access to rehabilitation. To address this, our group developed and evaluated a rehabilitation planning consult (RPC). The RPC is conducted through an initial consultation and a single follow-up session with a rehabilitation professional. During the initial consultation, rehabilitation needs are determined and the survivor sets individualized goals and plans. They then implement their plans independently and are facilitated to evaluate and modify plans as necessary during the follow-up session.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used a waitlist control design to compare the proportion of participants attaining a minimally importantly different change in quality of life (QOL) on the Short Form 36 Physical Health Summary Score from baseline to 3 months after study enrollment, between patients randomized to receive (n = 77) or wait 14 ± 3 weeks to receive (n = 76) the RPC. Additional outcomes included goal attainment indicators measured using the Brief Rehabilitation Assessment for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer (BRASH).

RESULTS

Of 153 participants recruited, 95 (62%) completed the intervention; 57 were in the immediate (RPC) group and 38 were in the waiting list control (WLC) group. No significant between-group differences were seen in the proportion of patients achieving a minimally important improvement (2.5 units) on the Physical Health Summary Score from baseline to 3 months after recruitment. No between-group differences were seen on any secondary QOL indicators. Among the 67 (RPC n = 42, WLC n = 22) participants who set individualized rehabilitation goals, BRASH scores on goal performance and satisfaction with goal performance were significantly better in the RPC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the RPC may provide benefit in patients' individualized domains of choice among those who set goals, without affecting overall QOL. Future work could refine the subset of patients who benefit and explore the optimal timing and intensity of the intervention.

Individualized risk assessment of distant metastases in oral cavity carcinoma: a validated predictive-score model

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for distant metastases (DMs) in oral cavity carcinoma (OCC).

METHODS

Patients with OCC who were treated at 4 tertiary cancer institutions with curative surgery with or without postoperative radiation/chemoradiation therapy were randomly assigned to discovery or validation cohorts (3:2 ratio). Cases were staged on the basis of tumor, node, and metastasis staging according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control guidelines. Predictors of DMs on multivariable analysis in the discovery cohort were used to develop a risk-score model and classify patients into risk groups. The utility of the risk classification was evaluated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Overall, 2749 patients were analyzed. Predictors (risk score coefficient) of DMs in the discovery cohort were the following: pathological stage (p)T3-4 (0.4), pN+ (N1: 0.8; N2: 1.0; N3: 1.5), histologic grade (G) 3 (G3, 0.7), and lymphovascular invasion (0.4). The DM risk groups were defined by the sum of the following risk score coefficients: high (>1.7), intermediate (0.7-1.7), and standard risk (<0.7). The 5-year DM rates (high/intermediate/standard risk groups) were 30%/15%/4% in the discovery cohort (C-index = 0.79) and 35%/16%/5% in the validation cohort, respectively (C-index = 0.77; both P < .001). In the whole cohort, this predictive model showed excellent discriminative ability in predicting DMs without locoregional failure (29%/11%/1%), later (>2 year) DMs (11%/4%/2%), and DMs in patients treated with surgery (20%/12%/5%), postoperative radiation therapy (34%/17%/4%), and postoperative chemoradiation therapy (39%/18%/7%) (all P < .001). The 5-year overall survival rates in the overall cohort were 25%/51%/67% (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at higher risk for DMs were identified by use of a predictive-score model for DMs that included pT3-4, pN1/2/3, G3, and lymphovascular invasion. Identified patients may be evaluated for individualized risk-adaptive treatment escalation and/or surveillance strategies.

Implication of dental insurance status on patterns of pre-radiation dental extraction and risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw in head-and-neck cancer patients

Oral toxicities such as osteoradionecrosis can be minimized by dental screening and prophylactic dental care prior to head and neck (HN) radiation therapy (RT). However, limited information is available about how dental insurance interacts with prophylactic dental care and osteoradionecrosis. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a cohort study of 2743 consecutive adult patients treated with curative radiation for HN malignancy who underwent pre-radiation dental assessment and where required, prophylactic dental treatment. Charts were reviewed to determine patient demographics, dental findings, dental treatment and development of osteoradionecrosis following radiation. Three insurance cohorts were identified: private-insured (50.4 %), public-insured (7.3 %), being patients with coverage through government-funded disability and welfare programs, and self-pay (42.4 %). More than half the public-insured patients underwent prophylactic pre-radiation dental extractions, followed by self-pay patients (44 %) and private-insured patients (26.6 %). After a median follow-up time of 4.23 years, 6.5 % of patients developed osteoradionecrosis. The actuarial rate of osteoradionecrosis in the public-insured patients was 14.7 % at 5-years post-RT, compared to 7.5 % in private-insured patients and 6.7 % in self-pay patients. On multivariable analysis, dental insurance status, DMFS160, age at diagnosis, sex, tumor site, nodal involvement, years smoked and gross income were all significant risk factors for tooth removal prior to HN radiation. However, only public-insured status, tumor site and years smoked were significant risk factors for development of osteoradionecrosis. Our findings demonstrate that lack of comprehensive dental coverage (patients who self-pay or who have limited coverage under public-insured programs) associates strongly with having teeth removed prior to HN RT. Nearly 1 in 6 patients covered under public-insurance developed osteoradionecrosis within 5 years of completing their treatment. Well-funded dental insurance programs for HN cancer patients might reduce the number of pre-RT extractions performed in these patients, improving quality of life post-RT.

Supply and Demand for Radiation Oncologists in Canada: Workforce Planning Projections From 2020 to 2040

PURPOSE

The number of Canadians diagnosed with cancer, and subsequent demand for radiation therapy, are expected to increase over time. This study aimed to update our needs-based workforce planning model to ensure appropriate staffing levels in the future.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The supply of radiation oncologists, by age group, sex, and full-time equivalent status, was projected from 2020 to 2040 using a recursive-aging, input-output model developed with seeding parameters derived from national sources. The demand for radiation oncologists until 2040 was estimated using referral patterns for radiation therapy and consultation workload metrics applied to projected annual cancer incident cases to calculate required full-time equivalent positions. Baseline model parameters were also applied to the 2005-2019 workforce and incident case data to evaluate preprojection supply and demand trends.

RESULTS

Preprojection trends for 2005 to 2019 revealed accelerated staffing growth that transitioned from a workforce shortage to a surplus state in 2014 followed by substantial growth slowdown in 2016. The model predicts a transient surplus of radiation oncologists until 2026 followed by a projected deficit in subsequent years. Sensitivity analyses using the plausible range for each parameter continued to favor an undersupply, suggesting a trainee shortage unable to meet workforce expansion needs. Considering possible future declining trends in radiotherapy utilization and workload, calculations to inform corrective efforts in resident numbers resulted in 25 entry positions per year, up from 21 per year currently. Geographic distribution of trainees, relative to workforce and cancer incidence distributions, could be improved with more residency positions in Canadian regions outside Ontario.

CONCLUSIONS

Demand for radiation therapy and radiation oncologists in Canada are expected to grow more quickly than future expansion in staffing levels. Our workforce planning model provides evidence for more trainee requirements to inform stakeholders of possible corrective actions to training programs and recruitment. Further research is needed to explore additional strategies to expand capacity and high-quality delivery of radiation therapy to meet the foreseeable increase in Canadian patients with cancer.

Associations between Human Papillomavirus Status, Weight Change, and Survival of Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients

This study examined associations between HPV status and weight change in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). OPC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Toronto, Canada were included. Relationships were assessed between HPV status and weight loss grade (WLG, combining weight loss and current body mass index); weight change during treatment; and HPV status and WLG/weight change on overall (OS) and cancer-specific (CSS) survival. Of 717 patients, WLG pre-radiation was less severe among HPV-positive compared to HPV-negative, though weight loss during treatment was greater. The adjusted odds ratio for greater WLG among HPV-positive versus HPV-negative was 0.47 (95%CI 0.28-0.78). Grade-4 WLG (worst category) experienced poorer OS and CSS (OS adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.08; 95%CI 1.48-11.2, compared to Grade-0); and was non-significant for HPV-negative (aHR 2.34; 95%CI 0.69-7.95). Relationships between weight change before/during treatment and survival had similar direction between HPV-positive and HPV-negative, but of greater magnitude in HPV-positive patients.

Health-related quality of life in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: a longitudinal analysis of the ABVD arm in the randomized controlled trial HD.6

Early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma has become one of the most curable hematologic malignancies. Depending upon the disease location, possible toxicities, and patient preference, chemotherapy alone with ABVD remains an accepted treatment modality for this disease. There remains a paucity of data regarding the longitudinal trajectory of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients treated for HL. The impact of disease and treatment on HRQoL is increasingly important to understand as the number of long-term survivors increases. We report the longitudinal HRQoL using data prospectively collected from diagnosis up to 10 years post-treatment in the ABVD arm of the HD.6 randomized controlled trial for early-stage HL patients (N=169). We analyzed HRQoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after completion of chemotherapy and yearly up to year 10. Clinically and statistically significant improvements were noted for specific domains including emotional (3 months post-treatment), social (12 months post-treatment) and financial functioning (2 years post-treatment), and the specific symptom of fatigue (6 months post-treatment) during the follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective, longitudinal analysis of HRQoL specifically among patients with early-stage HL treated with ABVD therapy alone. Although improvements were noted, sustained clinically and statistically significant improvements were noted only in select symptoms emphasizing the need to better understand and optimize HRQoL among this patient group.

Impact of radiotherapy quality assurance on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Usage of a novel web-based quality assurance application

PURPOSE

We used a new web application for rapid review of radiotherapy (RT) target volumes to evaluate the relationship between target delineation compliance with the international guidelines and outcomes of definitive RT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dataset consists of CT simulation scans, RT structures, and clinical data of 354 pathology-confirmed NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated RT between 2005 and 2017. Target volumes were peer-reviewed in RT QA rounds, and target contours were revised, if recommended, before treatment. We imported the contours of intermediate-risk clinical target volumes of the primary tumor (IR-CTVp) of 332 patients into the application. Inclusion of anatomic sites within IR-CTVp was determined in accordance with 2018 International guideline for CTV delineation for NPC and correlated with time to local failure (TTLF) using Cox-regression.

RESULTS

In the peer-review QA analysis, local and distant control and overall survival (OS) rates were similar between peer-reviewed and non-reviewed cases and between cases with and without target contour changes. In the CTV compliance analysis, with a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 5-year TTLF and OS rates were 93.1% and 85.9% respectively. The most frequently non-guideline compliant anatomic sites were sphenoid sinus (n=69, 20.8%), followed by cavernous sinus (n=38, 19.3%), left and right petrous apices (n=37 and 32, 11.1% and 9.6%), and clivus (n=14, 4.2%). Among 23 patients with a local failure (6.9%), the number of non-compliant cases were 8 for sphenoid sinus, 7 cavernous sinus, 4 left and 3 right petrous apices, and 2 clivus. Cavernous sinus-conforming cases showed higher TTLF in comparison with non-conforming cases (93.6% vs 89.1%, p=0.013). Multivariable analysis confirmed that cavernous sinus non-compliance was prognostic for TTLF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our application allowed rapid quantitative review of CTVp in a large NPC cohort. While compliance with the international guidelines was high, under-coverage of the cavernous sinus was correlated with TTLF.

Clustering on longitudinal quality-of-life measurements using growth mixture models for clinical prognosis: Implementation on CCTG/AGITG CO.20 trial

INTRODUCTION

Analyzing longitudinal cancer quality-of-life (QoL) measurements and their impact on clinical outcomes may improve our understanding of patient trajectories during systemic therapy. We applied an unsupervised growth mixture modeling (GMM) approach to identify unobserved subpopulations ("patient clusters") in the CO.20 clinical trial longitudinal QoL data. Classes were then evaluated for differences in clinico-epidemiologic characteristics and overall survival (OS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In CO.20, 750 chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were randomized to receive Brivanib+Cetuximab (n = 376, experimental arm) versus Cetuximab+Placebo (n = 374, standard arm) for 16 weeks. EORTC-QLQ-C30 QoL summary scores were calculated for each patient at seven time points, and GMM was applied to identify patient clusters (termed "classes"). Log-rank/Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to analyze the survival performance between classes. Cox analyses were used to explore the relationship between baseline QoL, individual slope, and the quadratic terms from the GMM output with OS.

RESULTS

In univariable analysis, the linear mixed effect model (LMM) identified sex and ECOG Performance Status as strongly associated with the longitudinal QoL score (p < 0.01). The patients within each treatment arm were clustered into three distinct QoL-based classes by GMM, respectively. The three classes identified in the experimental (log-rank p-value = 0.00058) and in the control arms (p < 0.0001) each showed significantly different survival performance. The GMM's baseline, slope, and quadratic terms were each significantly associated with OS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

GMM can be used to analyze longitudinal QoL data in cancer studies, by identifying unobserved subpopulations (patient clusters). As demonstrated by CO.20 data, these classes can have important implications, including clinical prognostication.

Canadian Cancer Trials Group HE.1: A phase III study of palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases

LBA492

Purpose: To determine if more patients (pts) with painful liver cancer have improved pain 1 month following radiation therapy (RT), compared to best supportive care (BSC). Methods: This multi-centre, phase III trial randomized pts with painful hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases (LM) 1:1 to BSC alone or with single fraction RT (8 Gy). Eligible pts had end-stage disease unsuitable for local, regional or systemic therapies, > 4 weeks since chemotherapy or TACE, > 2 weeks since targeted therapy or immunotherapy, and no planned systemic therapy. The primary objective was to determine if the proportion of pts with improved liver cancer pain "intensity at worst" on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) by ≥2 points from baseline to 1 month was higher following RT vs. BSC alone. Secondary endpoints included proportion of pts 1) alive at 3 months, 2) with improvement ≥2 points in BPI at 1 and 3 months, 3) with a 25% reduction in opioids at 1 month and 4) with improved quality of life (QOL): Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) hepatobiliary subscale (HBS) change score ≥5 and Trial Outcome Index ≥7 at 1 month. Results: Sixty-six pts were randomized, 43 with LM (12 colorectal, 5 breast, 4 pancreas, 3 lung, 19 other), 23 with HCC. 59% had ECOG performance status 2 or 3, 64% Child Pugh (CP) score A vs. 36% CP B or C. The clinical target volume irradiated was the whole liver or near whole liver (median 2013 cc). Forty-two pts (24 on RT and 18 on BSC) completed baseline and 1-month assessments. The average baseline pain at worst score was 7/10. A significant improvement in the primary endpoint, ‘worst’ pain score on BPI, from baseline to 1 month was seen in 67% of pts on RT and 22% on BSC (p = 0.004). The proportion of pts with improved ‘worst’ pain at 1 month, with no increase in opioid use was 21% on RT vs 0% with BSC (p = 0.07). From baseline to 1 month, the proportion of pts with a significant improvement in BPI “pain at its least” was higher for pts on RT vs. BSC (63% vs. 28%, p = 0.03), as was BPI “percentage relief in pain by treatment” (59% vs. 25%, p = 0.04). A sensitivity analysis of all pts, treating those with no 1 month assessment as having ‘no improvement’, found improvements in BPI ‘worst’ pain in 49% of pts on RT and 12% for BSC alone (p = 0.002). Eleven patients on the BSC arm crossed over to receive RT at 1 month. A trend to improvement in FACT HBS post RT vs BSC was seen at 1 month (p = 0.07), with no statistically significant difference in other FACT-Hep subscales. The proportion of pts with grade ≥2 AE (CTCAEv4.0) at day 30 was 58% on RT vs 33% on BSC (p = 0.05). Grade ≥3 AE were uncommon. There was a trend for improved 3 month survival with RT (51% vs. 33% for BSC alone, p = 0.07). Conclusions: Single fraction RT (8 Gy) improves hepatic pain in the majority of patients with end-stage HCC or liver metastases, with a trend to improved survival. This research is funded by the Canadian Cancer Society (Grant #703547). Clinical trial information: NCT02511522 .

Evaluation of dosimetric predictors of toxicity after IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy for anal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the impact of dosimetric parameters on acute and late toxicity for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in an observational cohort study between 2008 and 2013 (median follow-up 3.4 years). They were treated with standardized target and organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring, planning, and IG-IMRT. Radiotherapy dose, based on clinicopathologic features, ranged from 45 Gy to 63 Gy to gross targets and 27 Gy to 36 Gy to elective targets. Chemotherapy was concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C (weeks 1&5). Toxicity was prospectively graded using NCI CTCAE v.3 and RTOG scales. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between dose/volume parameters (e.g small bowel V5) and corresponding grade 2 + and 3+ (G2+/3 + ) toxicities (e.g. diarrhea).

RESULTS

In total, 87 and 79 patients were included in the acute and late toxicity analyses, respectively. The most common acute G2 + toxicities were skin (dermatitis in 87 % [inguino-genital skin], 91 % [perianal skin]) and hematologic in 58 %. G2 + late anal toxicity (sphincter dysfunction), gastrointestinal toxicity, and skin toxicity were respectively experienced by 49 %, 38 %, and 44 % of patients. Statistically significant associations were observed between: G2 + acute diarrhea and small bowel V35; G2 + acute genitourinary toxicity and bladder D_0.5cc; G2 + inguino-genital skin toxicity and anterior skin V35; G2 + perianal skin toxicity and posterior skin V15; G2 + anemia and lower pelvis bone V45. D0.5 cc was significantly predictive of late toxicity (G2 + anal dysfunction, intestinal toxicity, and inguino-genital/perianal dermatitis). Maximum skin toxicity grade was significantly correlated with the requirement for a treatment break.

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant dose-volume parameters were identified and may be used to offer individualized risk prediction and to inform treatment planning. Additional validation of the results is required.

Evaluation of risk-tailored individualized selection of radiation therapy target volume for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary

PURPOSE

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has enabled risk-tailored approach to elective mucosal and nodal clinical target volumes (CTVs) in treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). This study report outcomes following such approach.

METHODS

HNCUP patients treated with definitive IMRT between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed. Local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS) and grade ≥3 late toxicity (LT) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify OS predictors for entire cohort and cN2-3 subgroup.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were eligible: cN1 (7%), cN2a (14%), cN2b (46%), cN2c (14%) and cN3 (19%). Among 118 patients with known HPV status (by p16 staining), 81 (68%) were positive. IMRT target volume spared contralateral tonsil (55%), bilateral or contralateral sides of hypopharynx (72%), nasopharynx (72%), larynx (87%) and contralateral uninvolved neck (21%). Median follow-up was 5 years. Five-year LF, RF, DM, OS, and LT were 3%, 14%, 10%, 79%, and 7% respectively. Four patients developed mucosal recurrence: 3 within and 1 at the margin of the elective mucosal CTV. None of ipsilateral neck irradiation patients failed in the contralateral uninvolved neck. MVA identified cN2c-N3, HPV-negative status and older age as predictors for inferior OS. Within cN2-3 subgroup (n=189): cN2c-N3, HPV-negative status and older age predicted lower OS, while concurrent chemotherapy was associated with better OS.

CONCLUSION

Definitive IMRT with risk-adaptive radiation volume de-escalation for HNCUP resulted in high probability of tumor control with acceptable rate of late toxicity.

Patient Reported and Clinical Outcomes from 5 Fraction SBRT for Oligometastases - a Prospective Single Institution Study

PURPOSE

To describe the long-term outcomes of a five-fraction normal tissue tolerance adapted strategy for the management of oligometastases (OM).

METHODS & MATERIALS

Patients with histologically confirmed solid tumors, ≤5 extra-cranial metastases, suitable for a definitive approach for all metastatic lesions, at least one lesion suitable for SBRT, ECOG ≤2 were eligible. Treatment intervention was a 5-fraction (25- 55Gy) normal tissue adapted dosing strategy. The primary outcome was cumulative local progression rate at 12 months.

RESULTS

Between Mar 2013- Jan 2018, 137 patients started SBRT. Median FU was 35.7 months. 107 (78%) patients had a solitary OM. The mean PTV D₉₅ was 39.6 [SD 8.8]; BED₁₀ 70.8) Gy. Mean PTV D₉₅ was highest for lung lesions [48.7 (SD4.7); BED₁₀ 96.1] Gy, but was <40Gy for all other anatomical sites. Two Grade 3 toxicities (GI bleed) were observed with stomach D_0.05 30.3Gy and 30.4Gy. The cumulative local progression rate at 12/36 months was 16.1 (95% CI 10-22)% and 38.3 (95% CI 30-46.7) %; OS was 90% and 37%, and PFS was 58% and 19% respectively. Mean Symptom burden (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Total Score) worsened in patients with progressive disease (+8.8) at 12 months and was paralleled by changes in mean EORTC QLQ30 Summary Score and Global Health Quality of Life Score. Systemic therapy was initiated in 55% of patients at an average of 12.7 (SD12.4) months.

CONCLUSIONS

If long term PFS is the primary goal of therapy, SBRT for OM achieved this in less than 20% of patients attributable to a high risk of distant failure. Favorable local progression free survival is accompanied by preservation of QoL, avoidance of symptom progression and reduced need of antineoplastic therapies at 12 months. Information on symptom burden, QoL, as well as pattern of antineoplastic therapy use following progressive disease is useful to support conversations between patients, families and health care providers. Strategies to improve patient selection and reduce distant progression rate remain a priority for further study.

Osteoradionecrosis in head and neck cancer patients: Risk factors and comparison of grading systems

e18057

Background: We aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. We also compared frequency of severity scores across different ORN grading systems. Methods: Retrospective review was conducted for HNC patients who were managed at our institution (2011-2018) with curative-intent definitive, pre- or post-operative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 45Gy, and underwent pre-IMRT dental evaluation. Jaw ORN was defined based on: 1) clinical signs (exposed bone, bone spicules, sequestra, infection and fistula), 2) radiological finding (abnormal bone pattern, radiographic sequestra and pathological fracture), and 3) treatment required and response to therapy, either conservative (chlorhexidine rinse, antibiotics, PENTOCLO, and hyperbaric oxygen) or surgical (sequestrectomy, debridement, and jaw resection). ORN events were retrospectively graded using 6 different grading systems. Pre-IMRT periodontal condition (PC) was classified by universal multi-dimensional staging system based on number of teeth and bone loss (stages 0 to IV). Multivariable analysis (MVA) using logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors of ORN. Results: A total of 2735 HNC patients were included; median age 61 years, 30% (n = 807) current/ex-smokers, 72% (n = 1914) had moderate to severe PC (stage II-IV), 53% (n = 1459) oral cavity/oropharynx (OC/OP) primary tumor. The median IMRT dose was 70Gy/35 fractions, 43% (n = 1170) received concurrent chemotherapy, and 37% (n = 1006) underwent surgery. A total of 227 patients (8.3%) developed ORN. There was discrepancy in different grading system for capturing and reporting the degree of severity (i.e. grade) of ORN (table). On MVA, risk factors for ORN were: current/ex-smoker (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.12-2, p< 0.01), stage II-IV PC (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.17-2.36, p< 0.01), primary OC/OP tumor (OR 4.4, 95% CI: 3.08-6.29, p< 0.001], and IMRT dose prescription ≥60Gy (OR 3.5, 95%CI: 1.11-11.33, p< 0.01). Conclusions: ORN is relatively uncommon in HNC patients, however it can be under-reported by different grading systems. Risk factors for ORN were: smoking history, pre-IMRT poor PC condition, OC/OP primary tumor, and higher dose (≥60Gy) IMRT.[Table: see text]

Prognostic factors in sinonasal cancers: A multicenter pooled analysis

6092

Background: Sinonasal cancers (SC) are heterogeneous diseases. Despite multimodality treatment, overall survival (OS) remains unsatisfactory. We aimed to identify prognostic factors (PFs) associated with patterns of failure and OS in non-metastatic SC (nmSC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a pooled dataset of nmSC from Princess Margaret (Canada) and Catalan Institute of Oncology (Spain) treated with definitive surgery ± postop radiotherapy (RT) or RT ± chemo according to institutional protocols between 2010-2019. In squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), HPV status was tested by p16 staining, and HPV DNA (ISH or PCR) if equivocal. The primary goal was to assess the association of tumor histology, stage (by 7th edition TNM), and other clinicopathological variables on locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC) and OS. Actuarial rates were calculated with Kaplan–Meier (KM) method. Multivariable analysis (MVA) calculated hazard ratios (aHR) adjusted for histology type, T-/N-categories, and primary treatment. Results: Out of 342 pts, median age was 62 years (y) (range 21-96), Male:Female = 212:130, 95% had ECOG 0-1. Tumor histology types were: 192 (56%) SCC (p16+: 35; p16-/untested: 157), 40 (12%) adenocarcinoma (AD), 33 (10%) sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma or sinonasal neuroendocrine tumors (SNUC/SNEC), 28 (8%) malignant melanoma (MM), 27 (8%) esthesioneuroblastoma (ES) and 22 (6%) adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Median follow up was 3.6 y (range 0.1-11.3). Three-year actuarial rates for each endpoint are included in table. The PFs for LRC by MVA were: SNUC/SNEC (vs SCC) histology, T3-4 (vs T1-2: aHR 2.4, p = < 0.01) and N+ (vs N-: aHR 1.7, p = 0.02) diseases. The PFs for DC were: MM (vs SCC) and SNUC/SNEC (vs SCC) histology, and T3-4 (vs T1-2: aHR 6.0, p = 0.01) disease. The PFs for OS were: MM (vs SCC) histology, older age (aHR 1.0, p < 0.01), T3-4 (vs T1-2: aHR 5.6, p < 0.01), and N+ (vs N-: aHR 2.5, p < 0.01) disease. There was no difference in primary surgery vs RT in any outcome endpoint (all p > 0.05). p16+ SCC had a marginally higher LRC but similar DC and OS vs p16-/untested SCC (table). Conclusions: This large multicentre cohort of nmSC shows different patterns of relapse and survival with different tumor histologies. Our results suggest that individualization of treatment and follow-up strategies by histologic type is recommended to optimize outcomes in these orphan diseases. [Table: see text]

Clinical presentation and outcome of human papillomavirus-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a North American cohort

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) versus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive NPC and HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).

METHODS

Clinical characteristics and presenting signs/symptoms were compared between patients who had viral-related NPC versus viral-related OPC treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy from 2005 to 2020 and who were matched 1:1 (by tumor and lymph node categories, smoking, age, sex, histology, and year of diagnosis). Locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) were compared using the 2005-2018 cohort to maintain 2 years of minimum follow-up. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the cohort effect.

RESULTS

Similar to HPV-positive OPC (n = 1531), HPV-positive NPC (n = 29) occurred mostly in White patients compared with EBV-positive NPC (n = 422; 86% vs. 15%; p < .001). Primary tumor volumes were larger in HPV-positive NPC versus EBV-positive NPC (median volume, 51 vs. 23 cm³ ; p = .002), with marginally more Level IB nodal involvement. More patients with HPV-positive NPC complained of local pain (38% vs. 3%; p = .002). The median follow-up for the 2005-2018 cohort was 5.3 years. Patients who had HPV-positive NPC (n = 20) had rates of 3-year LRC (95% vs. 90%; p = .360), DC (75% vs. 87%; p = .188), and OS (84% vs. 89%; p = .311) similar to the rates in those who had EBV-positive NPC (n = 374). Patients who had HPV-positive NPC also had rates of LRC (95% vs. 94%; p = .709) and OS (84% vs. 87%; p = .440) similar to the rates in those who had HPV-positive OPC (n = 1287). The DC rate was lower in patients who had HPV-positive disease (75% vs. 90%; p = .046), but the difference became nonsignificant (p = .220) when the analysis was adjusted for tumor and lymph node categories, smoking, and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-positive NPC and EBV-positive NPC seem to be mutually exclusive diseases. Patients who have HPV-positive NPC have greater local symptom burden and larger primary tumors but have similar outcomes compared with patients who have EBV-positive NPC or HPV-positive OPC.

Development and Validation of an Oral Cavity Cancer Outcomes Prediction Score Incorporating Patient-Derived Xenograft Engraftment

IMPORTANCE

Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) offer the opportunity to identify patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who are at risk for recurrence and optimize clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a prediction score for locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastases (DM) in OSCC that incorporates PDX engraftment in addition to known clinicopathological risk factors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this retrospective cohort study, PDX models were generated from patients with OSCC treated with curative intent at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada) between 2006 and 2018. The cohort included 288 patients (aged ≥18 years) with a new diagnosis of nonmetastatic (M0) OSCC whose tumor samples were available for engraftment under the skin of xenograft mice. Patients were scored as a nonengrafter if PDX formation did not occur within 6 months. Data analysis was performed between August 2006 and May 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received up-front curative-intent surgery followed by either observation or postoperative radiation with or without concurrent chemotherapy based on institutional guidelines.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Main outcomes were LRF, DM, and overall survival (OS). Multivariable analysis (MVA) was used to identify predictors of LRF and DM. Factors retained in the final MVA were used to construct a prediction score and classify patients into risk groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 288 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 63.3 [12.3] years; 112 [39%] women and 176 [61%] men) with OSCC were analyzed. The MVA identified pT3-4, pathologic extranodal extension, and engraftment as predictors of LRF and DM. Patients whose tumors engrafted (n = 198) were more likely to develop LRF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.24-3.18) and DM (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.21-5.75) compared with nonengrafters. A prediction score based on the aforementioned variables identified patients at high risk and low risk for LRF (43.5% vs 26.5%), DM (38.2% vs 8.4%), and inferior OS (34% vs 66%) at 5 years. Additionally, rapid engraftment was shown to be similarly prognostic, with rapid engrafters demonstrating higher rates of relapse and poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study, a prediction score using OSCC PDX engraftment, in conjunction with pT3-4 and pathologic extranodal extension, was associated with improved prognostic utility of existing clinical models and predicted patients at risk for LRF, DM, and poor survival.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Canadian Radiation Oncology Practices

Purpose

To survey Canadian radiation oncology (RO) practice leaders to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiation services and patient and staff issues in the early phase of the pandemic and 1 year later.

Methods and Materials

The RO leader (department or division head) from every Canadian cancer center with radiation services was identified. Two surveys were circulated to the identified leader via email from the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology central office, using the SurveyMonkey survey tool: the first closed in June 2020 and the second (expanded) survey in June 2021, representing 2 points in time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Questions included patient volume, service interruptions and delays, and changes in scheduling and telemedicine use. Additional questions were included in the follow-up survey to determine further effects on disease presentation, volume, vaccination and access, and personnel issues.

Results

Telemedicine was widely adopted early in the pandemic and continued to be a common technique to communicate and connect with patients. Although many centers were deferring or delaying certain disease sites early in the pandemic, this was not as prevalent 1 year later. Reduced cancer screening and patients presenting with more advanced disease were concerns documented in the 2021 survey. A high level of concern regarding stress among health care professionals was identified.

Conclusions

Canadian RO centers have faced numerous challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic but continued to provide timely and essential cancer care for patients with cancer. Future evaluation of RO center practices will be important to continue to document and address the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on issues relevant to RO leaders, patients, and staff.

Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for dysphagia in head and neck cancer: a systematic review protocol using COSMIN methodology

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) is one of the most common and debilitating sequelae of head and neck cancer (HNC). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a fundamental component of dysphagia outcomes evaluation, as they inform treatment consequences that cannot be captured by objective clinician measures. Many PROMs for dysphagia in HNC are available, but their validity is unclear. As a consequence, the selection of the most appropriate PROM for dysphagia in HNC is complex and often based on the clinician's personal preferences, rather than on valid psychometric properties. This protocol describes a systematic review aiming at (1) identifying PROMs specific to dysphagia symptoms, swallowing functional status, swallowing-related health status, and swallowing-related quality of life in HNC, (2) mapping them to our conceptual framework of dysphagia-related PROs, and (3) appraising their psychometric properties using the Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) methodology.

METHODS

Six electronic databases will be searched from inception to December 2020 for all primary studies in any language and design detailing PROM development, reliability, validity, feasibility, interpretability, and/or cross-cultural adaptation. Eligibility criteria will target PROMs for patients with HNC (≥ 90% of the study sample) with ≥ 20% of their items pertaining to swallowing. Two independent raters will screen abstract and full texts and a third rater will resolve discrepancies. Data will be extracted on study, sample and PROM characteristics, and results of psychometric testing. PROMs will be mapped to our conceptual framework. The methodological quality of included PROMs and their psychometric properties will be appraised using the COSMIN risk of bias checklist and evidence will be summarized using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will provide a summary of existing dysphagia-related PROMs for people with HNC and a comprehensive account of their psychometric properties. We will provide recommendations on PROMs selection which will aid healthcare professionals to the most appropriate PROM based on its validity, reliability, feasibility, interpretability and suitability for clinical and research settings. Further recommendations will be made on areas of measurement property requiring further testing.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021237877.

Employment Outcomes for Canadian Radiation Oncology Graduates: 2020 Assessment and Longitudinal Trends

Purpose

Canadian radiation oncology (RO) trainees have experienced employment challenges after residency training. The present study was conducted to evaluate current employment trends and perform comparisons to prior reported assessments.

Methods and Materials

A survey was administered to all 13 Canadian RO program directors requesting the employment status and location of their graduates during the past 3 years, and their perceptions on graduates’ employment challenges. Visa trainees were excluded. Findings were compared with surveys performed in 2014, 2016, and 2018.

Results

The response rate from RO program directors was 100%. There were 77 graduates identified who completed their residency training between 2017 and 2020. All had known employment status and location. Two (17%) 2020 graduates, 16 (84%) 2019 graduates, 17 (81%) 2018 graduates, and 24 (100%) 2017 graduates had staff employment. Of the 59 graduates with staff positions, 86% were in Canada. Some graduates (28%) obtained staff or locum employment in a province other than their training program. The proportion of graduates obtaining staff positions 1 year after residency increased to 84% from 46%-48% in prior assessments. Most program directors (62%) did not perceive any difficulties with their graduates finding staff employment or trainees transferring to training programs in other disciplines owing to perceived workforce challenges.

Conclusions

Compared with 3 prior employment outcome assessments, this study observed a higher proportion of graduates with staff positions in Canada, fewer total graduates, fewer graduates seeking staff employment or in fellowship positions, and a trend for fewer graduates seeking employment or fellowships abroad. These findings support the view that the Canadian RO job market continues to improve. Although employment challenges for newly certified, Canadian-trained radiation oncologists still exist, national corrective measures to regulate resident intake in 2011 appear to have had a positive effect on the employment outcomes of recent Canadian RO graduates.

Treatment outcomes and survival following definitive (chemo)radiotherapy in HPV-positive oropharynx cancer: Large-scale comparison of DAHANCA vs PMH cohorts

We compare outcomes in two large-scale contemporaneously treated HPV-positive (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) cohorts treated with definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT). p16-confirmed HPV+ OPC treated between 2007 and 2015 at PMH and DAHANCA were identified. Locoregional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Multivariable analysis (MVA) calculated adjusted-hazard-ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI), adjusting for cohort, age, gender, performance status, smoking pack-years, T-category and N-category and chemotherapy. Compared to PMH (n = 701), DAHANCA (n = 1174) contained lower TNM-8T-categories (T1-T2: 77% vs 56%), N-categories (N0-N1: 77% vs 67%) and stages (stage I: 63% vs 44% (all P < .001). PMH used standard-fractionation CRT in 69% (481) while 31% (220) received hypofractionated or moderately accelerated RT-alone. All DAHANCA patients were treated with moderately accelerated RT; 96% (1129) received nimorazole (NIM) and 73% (856) concurrent weekly cisplatin. DAHANCA had shorter overall-treatment-time (P < .001), lower gross tumor (66-68 vs 70 Gy) and elective neck (50 vs 56 Gy) doses. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. DAHANCA had higher 5-year LRF (13% vs 7%, aHR = 0.47 [0.34-0.67]), comparable DM (7% vs 12%, aHR = 1.32 [0.95-1.82]), but better OS (85% vs 80%, aHR = 1.30 [1.01-1.68]). CRT patients had a lower risk of LRF (aHR 0.56 [0.39-0.82]), DM (aHR 0.70 [0.50-1.00]) and death (aHR 0.39 [0.29-0.52]) vs RT-alone. We observed exemplary outcomes for two large-scale trans-Atlantic HPV+ OPC cohorts treated in a similar manner. Concurrent chemotherapy was a strong, independent prognostic factor for all endpoints. Our findings underscore the need for a very careful approach to de-intensification of treatment for this disease.

Regional Recurrences and Hyams Grade in Esthesioneuroblastoma

Objective  The aim of this study is to determine if Hyams grade may help predict which patients with esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) tumors are likely to develop regional recurrences, and to determine the impact of tumor extent on regional failure in ENB patients without evidence of nodal disease at presentation. Design  The study was designed as a retrospective review for ENB patients. Settings  The study was prepared at tertiary care academic center for ENB patients. Participants  Patients with ENB were included in the study. Main Outcome Measures   Oncologic outcomes (5-year regional and locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival) in patients with Hyams low grade versus high grade. Oncologic outcomes based on radiographic disease extent. Results  A total of 43 patients were included. Total 25 patients (58%) had Hyams low-grade tumor, and 18 (42%) had high-grade tumor. Of the 34 patients without regional disease at presentation, 8 (24%) were treated with elective nodal radiation. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year regional control in the Hyams low-grade versus high-grade groups (78 vs. 89%; p  = 0.4). The 5-year LRC rates in patients with low grade versus high grade were 73 versus 89% ( p  = 0.6). The 5-year overall survival rates in patients with low-grade versus high-grade tumors were 86 versus 63% ( p  = 0.1). Radiographic extension of disease into the olfactory groove, olfactory nerve, dura, and periorbita were statistically associated with decreased 5-year overall survival (5-year OS 49 vs. 91% [ p  = 0.04], 49 vs. 91% [ p  = 0.04], 44 vs. 92% [ p  = 0.02], and 44 vs. 80% [ p  = 0.04], respectively). Conclusion  ENBs are associated with a risk of regional failure. The current analysis suggests that Hyams low-grade and high-grade malignancies have comparable rates of early and delayed regional recurrences, although small sample size may limit our conclusions.

Prognostic importance of radiologic extranodal extension in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in a Canadian cohort

PURPOSE

To confirm the prognostic value of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) and its role in clinical-N classification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated in a western institution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

NPC treated between 2010 and 2017 were included. Pre-treatment MRI were reviewed for unequivocal rENE and its grade: grade-1: tumour invading through any nodal capsule but confined to perinodal fat; grade-2: ≥2 adjacent nodes forming a coalescent nodal mass; grade-3: tumour extending beyond perinodal fat to invade/encase adjacent structures. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between rENE-positive (rENE+) and rENE-negative (rENE-) patients. Multivariable analysis (MVA) confirmed the prognostic importance of rENE and its grade. Staging schemas including rENE in N-classification were proposed and their performance evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients were eligible (43 cN0; 231 cN-positive). rENE was identified in 83/231 (36%) cN-positive, including grade 1/2/3 rENE in 14/58/11 cases. Compared to rENE-, rENE+ patients had a lower OS (68% vs 89%, p < 0.001) and DFS (58% vs 80%, p < 0.001). MVA confirmed the prognostic importance of grade-2 [HR: OS: 2.85 (p = 0.005); DFS: 2.89 (p < 0.001)] and grade-3 rENE [HR: OS 5.28 (p = 0.004); DFS 3.86 (p = 0.005)], with a trend for grade-1 vs rENE- [HR: OS 2.63 (p = 0.13); DFS 1.49 (p = 0.520)]. We evaluated classifying any rENE as cN3 (Proposal-I) or any grade-2/grade-3 rENE as cN3 (Proposal-II). The stage schema with Proposal-I cN-classification ranked the highest in the performance evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

rENE is an important prognostic factor in this western NPC cohort. We propose classifying any unequivocal rENE as cN3.

Quantifying Neck Fibrosis and Its Functional Implications: Development of the Neck Fibrosis Scale

OBJECTIVE

Despite increasing recognition of the importance of functional outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer, post-treatment neck fibrosis remains poorly understood. We sought to develop and validate a patient reported outcome measure for head and neck cancer patients with neck fibrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multiphase cross-sectional study.

METHODS

To guide instrument development, we employed the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as our conceptual framework. Items were generated using a composite strategy consisting of patient focus groups, literature review, and expert opinion from a multidisciplinary group. Candidate items were reduced through the item impact method. Preliminary psychometric properties of the finalized instrument were evaluated through measures of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.

RESULTS

Four in person focus groups were held with 13 head and neck cancer patients. The process of item generation led to 221 relevant citations and 68 unique items. An additional 17 items were identified from review of existing neck disability questionnaires and expert opinion. A draft instrument with 25 candidate items was generated and reduced to its final 15-item scale using item impact method. Early psychometric testing revealed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and test-retest reliability [ICC = 0.95]. Internal consistency at the item level was good (>0.7) for 11/15 individual items. Four separate constructs were evaluated. Three of the four constructs matched our a priori hypotheses.

CONCLUSION

The Neck Fibrosis Scale demonstrates preliminary reliability and validity for discriminate use. Further research is needed to confirm dimensionality and assess responsiveness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2021.

The PRO-ACTIVE trial protocol: a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of PROphylACTic swallow InterVEntion for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Swallowing therapy is commonly provided as a treatment to lessen the risk or severity of dysphagia secondary to radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC); however, best practice is not yet established. This trial will compare the effectiveness of prophylactic (high and low intensity) versus reactive interventions for swallowing in patients with HNC undergoing RT.

METHODS

This multi-site, international randomized clinical trial (RCT) will include 952 adult patients receiving radiotherapy for HNC and who are at high risk for post-RT dysphagia. Participants will be randomized to receive one of three interventions for swallowing during RT: RE-ACTIVE, started promptly if/when dysphagia is identified; PRO-ACTIVE EAT, low intensity prophylactic intervention started before RT commences; or, PRO-ACTIVE EAT+EXERCISE, high intensity prophylactic intervention also started before RT commences. We hypothesize that the PRO-ACTIVE therapies are more effective than late RE-ACTIVE therapy; and, that the more intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT + EXERCISE) is superior to the low intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT). The primary endpoint of effectiveness is duration of feeding tube dependency one year post radiation therapy, selected as a pragmatic outcome valued equally by diverse stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers and clinicians). Secondary outcomes will include objective measures of swallow physiology and function, pneumonia and weight loss, along with various patient-reported swallowing-related outcomes, such as quality of life, symptom burden, and self-efficacy.

DISCUSSION

Dysphagia is a common and potentially life-threatening chronic toxicity of radiotherapy, and a priority issue for HNC survivors. Yet, the optimal timing and intensity of swallowing therapy provided by a speech-language pathologist is not known. With no clearly preferred strategy, current practice is fraught with substantial variation. The pragmatic PRO-ACTIVE trial aims to specifically address the decisional dilemma of when swallowing therapy should begin (i.e., before or after a swallowing problem develops). The critical impact of this dilemma is heightened by the growing number of young HNC patients in healthcare systems that need to allocate resources most effectively. The results of the PRO-ACTIVE trial will address the global uncertainty regarding best practice for dysphagia management in HNC patients receiving radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol is registered with the US Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the PRO-ACTIVE trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , under the identifier NCT03455608 ; First posted: Mar 6, 2018; Last verified: Jun 17, 2021. Protocol Version: 1.3 (January 27, 2020).

Out-of-pocket costs associated with head and neck cancer treatment

Background

Out‐of‐pocket costs (OOPC) associated with treatment have significant implications on quality of life and survival in cancer patients. Head and neck cancer patients face unique treatment‐related challenges, but to date OOPC have been understudied in this population.

Aims

This study aims to identify and measure OOPC for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in Ontario.

Methods

HNC patients between 2015 and 2018 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto were recruited. Participants completed OOPC questionnaires and lost income questions during radiation, post‐surgery, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after completion of treatment. Associations between OOPC and treatment modality and disease site were tested with multivariable hurdle regression.

Results

A total of 1545 questionnaires were completed by 657 patients. Median estimated OOPC for the total duration of treatment for participants undergoing chemoradiation was $1452 [$0–14 616], for surgery with adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation (C/RT) was $1626, for radiation therapy alone was $635, and for surgery alone was $360. The major expenses for participants at the mid‐treatment time‐point was travel (mean $424, standard error of the mean [SEM] $34) and meals, parking, and accommodations (mean $617, SEM $67). In multivariable analysis, chemoradiation, surgery with C/RT, and radiation were associated with significantly higher OOPC than surgery alone during treatment (791% higher, p < .001; 539% higher, p < .001; 370% higher, p < .001 respectively) among patients with non‐zero OOPC. Participants with non‐zero OOPC in the laryngeal cancer group paid 49% lower OOPC than those with oropharyngeal cancers in adjusted analysis (p = .025).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing treatment for HNC pay significant OOPC. These costs are highest during treatment and gradually decrease over time. OOPC vary by patient demographics, clinical factors, and, in particular, treatment modality.

Non-surgical management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review by Cancer Care Ontario

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health problem, accounting for 4.7% of all new cancer cases and 8.2% of all cancer deaths worldwide in 2018. Resection and transplantation are the only modalities that offer a cure for HCC; however, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, precluding these curative treatments. A number of local (ie, ablative therapies) and/or local-regional therapies (ie, chemo-embolization) are used and followed by systemic therapy for advanced or progressive disease. Other treatments are available, but their efficacy compared with these standards is not well known.

Methods

Literature searches (1/2000 to 1/2020 or 1/2005 to 1/2020, depending on the specific systematic review question) were conducted, including MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Results

Over 30,000 articles were identified. In total, 49 studies were included in the systematic review.

Conclusions

There is no evidence to support the addition of sorafenib to any local or regional therapy. First-line systemic therapy options for unresectable or metastatic HCC include sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Regorafenib or cabozantinib provide survival benefits when given as second-line treatment.

Design and Implementation of a Distant-Learning Clinical Research Mentorship Program: The Accra-Toronto Collaboration

PURPOSE

For many oncology training programs in low- and middle-income countries, dedicated time for research education and mentorship of trainees is limited. Here, we report a 1-year-long collaboration between a cancer center in Canada and one in Ghana with the aim of imparting clinical research skills and mentoring the research of radiation oncology residents.

METHODS

On the basis of a needs assessment conducted in Ghana, we designed a curriculum consisting of 13 weekly seminars delivered via videoconference, followed by a 1-year-long mentorship program to support research projects. The primary outcome was the feasibility of the program from seminars to manuscript preparation. We used multiple secondary outcomes to capture the learning experience with study-specific questionnaires. We evaluated critical thinking ability using the Berlin questionnaire. Funding was made available for research and travel to international conferences.

RESULTS

Five Ghanaian trainees submitted research proposals. Nine Canadian faculty members delivered the seminars and two served as methodology mentors, and two Ghanaian faculty acted as local supervisors. Feedback questionnaires from all participants showed that they agreed strongly that they would recommend the sessions to another resident (75%), that the objectives were clear (71%), and that the topics were useful for their training (73%). At the end of the program, two Ghanaian trainees finalized their manuscripts and one was published.

CONCLUSION

Here, we report on the implementation of a mentorship program focused on research methods and evidence-based medicine in sub-Saharan Africa. The program was successful in the drafting and publication of abstracts and manuscripts by local trainees.

The Potential Impact and Usability of the Eighth Edition TNM Staging Classification in Oral Cavity Cancer

AIMS

In the current eighth edition head and neck TNM staging, extranodal extension (ENE) is an adverse feature in oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OSCC). The previous seventh edition N1 with ENE is now staged as N2a. Seventh edition N2+ with ENE is staged as N3b in the eighth edition. We evaluated its potential impact on patients treated with surgery and postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OSCC patients treated with primary surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy between January 2005 and December 2014 were reviewed. Cohorts with pathological node-negative (pN-), pathological node-positive without ENE (pN+_pENE-) and pathological node-positive with ENE (pN+_pENE+) diseases were compared for local control, regional control, distant control and overall survival. The pN+ cohorts were further stratified into seventh edition N-staging subgroups for outcomes comparison.

RESULTS

In total, 478 patients were evaluated: 173 pN-; 159 pN+_pENE-; 146 pN+_pENE+. Outcomes at 5 years were: local control was identical (78%) in all cohorts (P = 0.892), whereas regional control was 91%, 80% and 68%, respectively (P < 0.001). Distant control was 97%, 87%, 68% (P < 0.001) and overall survival was 75%, 53% and 39% (P < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for N1 and N2a subgroups was not significantly different. In the seventh edition N2b subgroup of pENE- (n = 79) and pENE+ (n = 79) cohorts, overall survival was 67% and 37%, respectively. In the seventh edition N2c subgroups, overall survival for pENE- (n = 17) and pENE+ (n = 38) cohorts was 65% and 35% (P = 0.08), respectively. Overall, an additional 128 patients (42% pN+) were upstaged as N3b.

CONCLUSIONS

When eighth edition staging was applied, stage migration across the N2-3 categories resulted in expected larger separations of overall survival by stage. Patients treated with primary radiation without surgical staging should have outcomes carefully monitored. Strategies to predict ENE preoperatively and trials to improve the outcomes of pENE+ patients should be explored.

"It's good for the soul:" Perceptions of a formal junior faculty mentorship program at a large academic cancer centre

BACKGROUND

Mentorship fosters professional and personal growth; however, the components essential to program success remain unclear. Our objective was to evaluate and explore the impact of a junior faculty mentorship program within an academic radiation oncology department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2016, our institution implemented a junior faculty mentorship program consisting of: (1) an orientation handbook; (2) faculty development sessions; and (3) direct, one-to-one selection of a mentor. Confidentiality agreements are signed, a goals template is provided, and meeting dates are tracked. Mentors/mentees were invited to participate in a program evaluation using mixed-methodology: a questionnaire followed by a one-on-one semi-structured interview to explore perceptions of the program. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Descriptive statistics summarized questionnaire results and thematic analysis summarized interview results.

RESULTS

Eleven junior faculty have selected 10 mentors. Of these, 17 completed the evaluation questionnaire (81%) (7 mentors, 10 mentees; 5 women, 12 men) and 13 were interviewed (62%) (5 mentors, 8 mentees; 3 women, 10 men). The majority (80%) have participated in the program for >2 years. Although most mentees report additional mentors, 30% report this as their sole mentorship relationship. Four themes emerged: (i) Components of an Ideal Mentoring Relationship, (ii) The Value of Mentorship, (iii) Sponsorship, in addition to Mentorship and (iv) Cultivating Departmental Bonds and Boundaries.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a junior faculty mentorship program within an academic radiation oncology department is feasible. Participants expressed satisfaction with most formal program components. Many junior faculty have additional mentors; however, some do not, highlighting the importance of formal programs for professional development.

Outcome and treatment toxicity in east-indian versus white-canadian patients with oral cavity cancer following postoperative (chemo-)radiotherapy delivered under similar multidisciplinary care: A propensity-matched cohort study

PURPOSE

We compare clinical behaviour of East-Indians and White-Canadians with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated at a Western institution within a uniform health care system.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Newly diagnosed OSCC patients who underwent postoperative (chemo-)radiotherapy (PORT/POCRT) between 2005 and 2017 were included. Data on ethnicity and other variables were extracted from patient-questionnaires, a prospective database and supplemented by chart review. Baseline characteristics were compared between East-Indian versus White-Canadian groups. A propensity-matched (1:1 ratio) of East-Indian versus White-Canadian cohorts was generated to compare locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), overall survival (OS), and acute and late toxicities.

RESULTS

A total of 53 East-Indian and 467 White-Canadian OSCC patients were identified. Compared to White-Canadians, East-Indian patients were younger, had less exposure to smoking and alcohol (p < 0.001), but more chewed betel (areca) nut /tobacco (43% vs 0.2%, p < 0.001). Buccal/retromolar-trigone/lower gingiva primaries were more common in East-Indians (49% vs 25%, p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 5.0 years. Propensity-score paired analysis revealed inferior 3-year LRC (68% vs 81%, p = 0.030), non-significantly lower OS (61% vs 75%, p = 0.257), but similar DC (81% vs 87%, p = 0.428) in East-Indian versus White-Canadian patients. Actuarial rate of toxicities was higher in East-Indians vs White-Canadians: acute toxicity at 6 weeks: 47% vs 30%, p = 0.012; chronic trismus at 5-years: 16% vs 2%, p = 0.013.

CONCLUSION

East-Indian OSCC patients have a greater betel nut/ chewable tobacco exposure compared to White-Canadians and a different distribution of OSCC sites. Propensity-matched cohort analysis showed lower LRC and higher toxicities in East-Indian OSCC patients, suggesting a complicated interaction between genetic/biological and life-style factors.

Patient and family financial burden associated with cancer treatment in Canada: a national study

GOAL

To determine patient-reported financial and family burden associated with treatment of cancer in the previous 28 days across Canada.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire (P-SAFE v7.2.4) was completed by 901 patients with cancer from twenty cancer centres nationally (344 breast, 183 colorectal, 158 lung, 216 prostate) measuring direct and indirect costs related to cancer treatment and foregone care. Monthly self-reported out-of-pocket-costs (OOPCs) included drugs, homecare, homemaking, complementary/ alternative medicines, vitamins/supplements, family care, accommodations, devices, and "other" costs. Travel and parking costs were captured separately. Patients indicated if OOPC, travel, parking, and lost income were a financial burden.

RESULTS

Mean 28-day OOPCs were CA$518 (US Purchase Price Parity [PPP] $416), plus CA$179 (US PPP $144) for travel and CA$84 (US PPP $67) for parking. Patients self-reporting high financial burden had total OOPCs (33%), of CA$961 (US PPP $772), while low-burden participants (66%) had OOPCs of CA$300 (US PPP $241). "Worst burden" respondents spent a mean of 50.7% of their monthly income on OOPCs (median 20.8%). Among the 29.4% who took time off work, patients averaged 18.0 days off. Among the 26.0% of patients whose caregivers took time off work, caregivers averaged 11.5 days off. Lastly, 41% of all patients had to reduce spending. Fifty-two per cent of those who reduced spending were families earning < CA$50,000/year.

CONCLUSIONS

In our Canadian sample, high levels of financial burden exist for 33% of patients, and the severity of burden is higher for those with lower household incomes.

Updated report of a phase II randomized trial of transoral surgical resection followed by low-dose or standard postoperative therapy in resectable p16+ locally advanced oropharynx cancer: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (E3311)

6010

Background: Definitive or postoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is highly curative for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) but induces significant toxicity. As a potential deintensification strategy, we studied primary transoral surgery (TOS) and, in intermediate pathologic risk patients, reduced dose postoperative RT (PORT). Methods: E3311 is a phase II trial with randomization to reduced- or standard-dose PORT for resected stage III-IVa (AJCC7) intermediate pathologic risk HPV+ OPC, stratified by smoking history. Primary endpoints have been reported; we now present updated 3-year PFS and patient-reported outcomes (PRO), including head and neck-cancer specific quality of life (FACT-H&N) and swallowing perception and performance (MDADI). Results: Of 519 enrolled patients, 495 underwent TOS. The primary oncologic endpoint was 2-year PFS for 50 Gy (Arm B) or 60Gy (Arm C). Among 360 eligible and treated patients (ETP), Arm A (observation, N = 38) enrolled 11%, Arms B (N = 100) or C (N = 109) randomized 58%, and Arm D (66Gy + weekly cisplatin, N = 113) enrolled 31%. With 35.1 months median follow-up, 3-year PFS Kaplan-Meier estimate is 96.9% (90% CI [91.9%, 100%]) for Arm A; 94.9% (90% CI [91.3%, 98.6%]) for Arm B; 93.5% (90% CI [89.4%, 97.9%]) for Arm C; and 90.7% (90% CI [86.2%, 95.4%]) for Arm D. Recurrences and death without recurrence were 4 and 1 in Arm B, and 5 and one in Arm C. Smokers ( > 10 pack-years) did not have worse 3-year PFS in Arms B or C. Treatment arm distribution and outcome for ineligible patients who started adjuvant therapy mirrored the 360 ETP. A comparison combining arms B/C versus arm D in the proportion of patients stable/improved in FACT-H&N total score, from baseline to 6 months post-treatment as a pre-specified endpoint, was 56% vs. 38% (p value = 0.011, one-sided Fisher’s exact test); however, underlying differences in treatment and risk may be confounding. An exploratory comparison between Arms B and C revealed improvement in FACT H&N (63% in Arm B vs. 49% in Arm C had a stable/improved score, p-value = 0.056). Conclusions: Primary TOS and reduced PORT retained outstanding oncologic outcome at 35 months follow up, with favorable QOL and functional outcomes, in intermediate risk HPV+ OPC. Clinical trial information: NCT 01898494.

A Risk Score Model for Locoregional Recurrence Following Upfront Surgery for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Adjuvant Therapy

AIMS

The aims of the study were to identify predictors of locoregional failure (LRF) following surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, develop a prediction risk score model of LRF and evaluate the impact of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) on LRF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients with stages I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at our institution (2005-2016). Univariable and then multivariable analyses were used to evaluate clinicopathological factors associated with LRF for patients who did not receive PORT. The risk score of LRF was calculated based on the sum of coefficients of the predictors of LRF. The model was applied to the entire cohort to evaluate the impact of PORT on the high- and low-risk groups for LRF.

RESULTS

In total, 467 patients were identified (median follow-up 22 months). Among patients who did not receive PORT (n = 440), predictors of LRF were pN+, involved or close ≤1 mm margin(s), moderately and poorly differentiated tumour grade and lymphovascular invasion. After adding patients who received PORT, the 2-year LRF in the high-risk group was 57% for patients who did not receive PORT (n = 242) and 32% among patients who received PORT (n = 22), with an absolute benefit to LRF of 25% (95% confidence interval 5-52%, P = 0.07). The 2-year overall survival for the high-versus the low-risk group was 36% versus 67% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This risk group classification could be used to identify pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with higher risk of LRF who may benefit from PORT. However, validation and prospective evaluation are warranted.