Efficacy of the Rehabilitation Planning Consult for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Survivors of head and neck cancer may have significant lasting impairments and poor access to rehabilitation. To address this, our group developed and evaluated a rehabilitation planning consult (RPC). The RPC is conducted through an initial consultation and a single follow-up session with a rehabilitation professional. During the initial consultation, rehabilitation needs are determined and the survivor sets individualized goals and plans. They then implement their plans independently and are facilitated to evaluate and modify plans as necessary during the follow-up session.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used a waitlist control design to compare the proportion of participants attaining a minimally importantly different change in quality of life (QOL) on the Short Form 36 Physical Health Summary Score from baseline to 3 months after study enrollment, between patients randomized to receive (n = 77) or wait 14 ± 3 weeks to receive (n = 76) the RPC. Additional outcomes included goal attainment indicators measured using the Brief Rehabilitation Assessment for Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer (BRASH).

RESULTS

Of 153 participants recruited, 95 (62%) completed the intervention; 57 were in the immediate (RPC) group and 38 were in the waiting list control (WLC) group. No significant between-group differences were seen in the proportion of patients achieving a minimally important improvement (2.5 units) on the Physical Health Summary Score from baseline to 3 months after recruitment. No between-group differences were seen on any secondary QOL indicators. Among the 67 (RPC n = 42, WLC n = 22) participants who set individualized rehabilitation goals, BRASH scores on goal performance and satisfaction with goal performance were significantly better in the RPC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the RPC may provide benefit in patients' individualized domains of choice among those who set goals, without affecting overall QOL. Future work could refine the subset of patients who benefit and explore the optimal timing and intensity of the intervention.

Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery and intraoperative transverse abdominis plane block decreases opioid use and length of stay in very large open ventral hernia repairs

BACKGROUND

The effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway including liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominus plane (TAP)-blocks for abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) on opioids use is not clear.

METHODS

A prospective, tertiary hernia center database of patients undergoing AWR before and after ERAS and operative TAP-blocks was matched in large ventral hernias.

RESULTS

In 106 patients, non-TAP-block and TAP-block groups were comparable in mean BMI (p = 0.694), hernia defect size (p = 0.424), components separation (p = 0.610), complete fascial closure (p = 1.0), and panniculectomy (p = 1.0). The total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) used during hospitalization was reduced by 3-fold in the TAP-block group (p < 0.001), and opioid usage decreased by 35%-71% during days 1-5. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the TAP-block group by average of 1 day (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

ERAS and TAP-block in AWR leads to a decrease in mean opioid usage by 65% and decreased LOS by an average of 1 day.

A systematic review of immunosuppressant adherence interventions in transplant recipients: Decoding the streetlight effect

Non-adherence to immunosuppressant medications is an important risk factor for graft dysfunction. To evaluate the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions, we reviewed adherence intervention studies in solid organ transplant recipients (all ages). Using the following databases: PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, we identified 41 eligible studies. Only three non-randomized trials showed a possible positive effect on objective indicators of transplant outcomes (such as rejection, liver enzyme levels, kidney function). None of the 21 RCTs showed an improvement in transplant outcomes. Three studies showed a higher rate of adverse events in the intervention group as compared with controls, although this may be related to ascertainment bias. Improvement in adherence as measured indirectly (eg, with electronic monitoring devices) was not aligned with effects on transplant outcomes. We conclude that adherence interventions, to date, have largely been ineffective in improving transplant outcomes. To improve this track record, intervention efforts may wish to concentrate on non-adherent patients (rather than use convenience sampling, which excludes many of the patients who need the intervention), use direct measures of adherence to guide the interventions, and employ strategies that are intensive and yet engaging enough to ensure that non-adherent patients are able to participate.

Development and pre-testing of a rehabilitation planning consultation for head-and-neck cancer

BACKGROUND

In contrast with other major chronic conditions such as heart disease and stroke, cancer care does not routinely integrate evidence-based rehabilitation services within the standard continuum. The objectives of the present project were to develop a rehabilitation planning consultation (rpc) for survivors of head-and-neck (hn) cancer, to test its feasibility, and to make refinements.

METHODS

Using intervention mapping, the rpc-alpha was developed by examining potential theoretical methods and practical applications relative to the program objectives. During feasibility testing, a single case series was conducted with survivors of hn cancer who had completed their cancer treatment within the preceding 11 months; iterative refinements were made after each case.

RESULTS

The rpc-alpha was led by a rehabilitation professional and was based on self-management principles. The initial consultation included instruction in a global cognitive strategy, goal-setting, introduction to available resources, action planning, and coping planning. A follow-up consultation was conducted a few weeks later. Of 9 participants recruited, 5 completed post-intervention assessments. Participants reported that the rpc helped them to make rehabilitation plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The rpc was feasible to use and satisfactory to a small group of hn cancer survivors. A pilot test of the refined version is in process.

Prospective study of high grade anal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of homosexual men: influence of HIV infection, immunosuppression and human papillomavirus infection

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of developing high grade anal squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-AIN) in relation to HIV infection and immunosuppression, after controlling for the effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of 158 HIV-seropositive and 147 HIV-seronegative homosexual men presenting to a community-based clinic with initially negative anal cytologic and colposcopic findings.

METHODS

Subjects completed self-administered questionnaires, underwent cytologic screening, and standardized unaided and colposcopic examination of the proximal anal canal for presence of abnormalities suggestive of AIN. Anal specimens were screened for HPV DNA.

RESULTS

HG-AIN developed in eight (5.4%) and 24 (15.2%) HIV-seronegative and -seropositive men, respectively. Risk of HG-AIN among HIV-seronegative men was associated with detection of anal HPV types 16 or 18 by Southern transfer hybridization (STH), detection of HPV 16 or 18 at the lower levels by polymerase chain reaction but not by STH, and with number of positive HPV tests; HG-AIN risk among HIV-seropositive men was associated with detection of HPV 16 or 18 only by STH, detection of HPV types other than 16 or 18, CD4 count < or = 500 x 10(6)/l, and number of positive HPV tests. HIV-induced immunosuppression remained an independent predictor of HG-AIN after adjusting for type and level of detection of HPV; HIV infection predicted HG-AIN risk after adjustment for number of positive HPV tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of HG-AIN with HIV, independent of HPV type, level of HPV detection and number of positive HPV tests, suggests that this increased risk cannot be entirely explained by an effect of HIV on HPV detection. Future studies focusing on factors more specific to the local microenvironment in the anal canal should help clarify these issues.

Anal dysplasia in homosexual men: role of anoscopy and biopsy

BACKGROUND

Both anal squamous cell cancer and human papilloma virus (HPV) are increased in homosexual men. This study evaluates histology of internal anal abnormalities in a high-risk population of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive and seronegative homosexual men.

METHODS

Ninety men with abnormalities of the internal anal canal (referred from a cross-sectional study of 512 homosexual men) were evaluated by anoscopy, anal cytology, and directed biopsy. CD4 cell counts from blood and HPV types from anal tissue were also obtained.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight (86%) men had HPV-associated abnormalities: discrete warts in 39 (43%), a wart ring in 23 (26%), and flat white epithelium in 18 (20%). Dysplasia was detected by cytology in 36% and by biopsy in 92% (27% high grade). High-grade dysplasia was equally common in HIV-seropositive and -seronegative men. The morphology of anal lesions did not predict the presence of dysplasia. Both high- and low-risk HPV types were common in many of the biopsy specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal dysplasia is common in biopsy specimens from homosexual men with visible HPV-associated internal anal abnormalities. Natural history studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of anal dysplasia, rates of progression to cancer, and the role of screening and therapy.

Association of anal dysplasia and human papillomavirus with immunosuppression and HIV infection among homosexual men

OBJECTIVE

To examine and quantify the association between anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (ASIL), anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and immunosuppression among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative homosexual men.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study among homosexual men presenting at a community-based clinic for HIV serologic screening.

RESULTS

Anal HPV DNA was detected in 55 and 23% of 285 HIV-seropositive and 204 HIV-seronegative men, respectively, by Southern transfer hybridization (STH) [odds ratio (OR), 4.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7-6.2], and in 92 and 78% by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8). ASIL was noted in 26% of HIV-seropositive men and in 8% of HIV-seronegative men (compared with men with negative cytologic findings: OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 3.0-10.5), with high-grade lesions noted in 4% of HIV-seropositive and in 0.5% of HIV-seronegative men. Among HIV-infected men, ASIL, detection of specific anal HPV types, and detection of high levels of anal HPV DNA (i.e., levels of HPV DNA detectable by both STH and PCR) were all associated with immunosuppression. Nevertheless, HIV-seropositive men with CD4 counts > 500 x 10(6)/l had a higher prevalence of both anal HPV and ASIL than men without HIV infection. Overall, detection of HPV at high levels was associated with ASIL. However, after adjustment for level of detectable HPV DNA, the risk of ASIL among HIV-seropositive men with CD4 counts < 500 x 10(6)/l was increased 2.9-fold (95% CI, 1.4-6.2) over that of HIV-seropositive men with CD4 counts > 500 x 10(6)/l.

CONCLUSION

Given the high rates of ASIL in HIV-seronegative and both immunosuppressed and non-immunosuppressed HIV-seropositive homosexual men, natural history studies are now needed to assist in the development of strategies for the detection and management of such lesions. The increased prevalence of ASIL seen among immunosuppressed HIV-seropositive men may be the result of both a non-specific increase in productive HPV infection and HIV-induced immune alterations of HIV-related neoplasia.

Association of human immunodeficiency virus and anal human papillomavirus infection among homosexual men

BACKGROUND

A previous study of men with proctitis, proctocolitis, or enteritis showed an association of anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Because anorectal abnormalities may confound an observed association between anal HPV DNA and HIV seropositivity, the present study was undertaken among consecutive homosexual men seeking HIV serologic testing who were unselected for anorectal symptoms.

METHODS

Consecutive homosexual men underwent a standardized interview, physical examination, and collection of specimens for HIV serologic testing and detection of anal HPV DNA.

RESULTS

Anal HPV DNA was detected in eight (31%) of 26 HIV-seropositive men and in 10 (8%) of 119 HIV-seronegative men (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 30.1, adjusted for history of sexually transmitted disease, current anorectal symptoms, and age). When men with anorectal symptoms were excluded from the analysis, anal HPV DNA was detected in 27% of seropositive men compared with 8% of seronegative men (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 13.4). There was no difference between HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative men with respect to distribution of type of HPV DNA. Men with group II or III and group IV HIV disease were 4.1 and 10.9 times, respectively, more likely than HIV-seronegative men to have anal HPV DNA detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Because HIV-seropositive men appear to be at increased risk for the detection of anal HPV DNA, the natural course of anal HPV infection should be compared among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative homosexual men.

Oral mucosal lesions: association with the presence of antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus

To assess the relationship between oral lesions and antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus, oral examinations of 803 homosexual males were conducted at the time of serologic testing. Nineteen percent were HIV seropositive. Thirty percent of antibody-positive subjects had one or more oral lesion(s), as compared with 7% of antibody-negative subjects (p less than 0.001). The presence of oral lesions was significantly associated with HIV seropositivity: a subject was 5.7 times as likely to have serum antibodies if he had one or more oral lesions (95% confidence interval, 3.5 to 9.1; p less than 0.001). This significant association with HIV seropositivity was only partially explained by cigarette smoking (adjusted odds ratio 3.1; 1.4-6.8; less than 0.006). Specific conditions that were significantly associated with seropositivity included candidiasis, hairy leukoplakia, periodontal disease, and Kaposi's sarcoma. Other diseases identified included acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis, mucocutaneous ulcerations, and oral warts. Oral findings may occur earlier in the natural history of infection than previously reported.