1
|
Bührer E, D'Haese D, Daugaard G, de Wit R, Albany C, Tryakin A, Fizazi K, Stahl O, Gietema JA, De Giorgi U, Cafferty FH, Hansen AR, Tandstad T, Huddart RA, Necchi A, Sweeney CJ, Garcia-Del-Muro X, Heng DYC, Lorch A, Chovanec M, Winquist E, Grimison P, Feldman DR, Terbuch A, Hentrich M, Bokemeyer C, Negaard H, Fankhauser C, Shamash J, Vaughn DJ, Sternberg CN, Heidenreich A, Collette L, Gillessen S, Beyer J. Impact of teratoma on survival probabilities of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell cancer: Results from the IGCCCG Update Consortium. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114042. [PMID: 38564927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To resolve the ongoing controversy surrounding the impact of teratoma (TER) in the primary among patients with metastatic testicular non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours (NSGCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) Update Consortium database, we compared the survival probabilities of patients with metastatic testicular GCT with TER (TER) or without TER (NTER) in their primaries corrected for known prognostic factors. Progression-free survival (5y-PFS) and overall survival at 5 years (5y-OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Among 6792 patients with metastatic testicular NSGCT, 3224 (47%) had TER in their primary, and 3568 (53%) did not. In the IGCCCG good prognosis group, the 5y-PFS was 87.8% in TER versus 92.0% in NTER patients (p = 0.0001), the respective 5y-OS were 94.5% versus 96.5% (p = 0.0032). The corresponding figures in the intermediate prognosis group were 5y-PFS 76.9% versus 81.6% (p = 0.0432) in TER and NTER and 5y-OS 90.4% versus 90.9% (p = 0.8514), respectively. In the poor prognosis group, there was no difference, neither in 5y-PFS [54.3% in TER patients versus 55.4% (p = 0.7472) in NTER], nor in 5y-OS [69.4% versus 67.7% (p = 0.3841)]. NSGCT patients with TER had more residual masses (65.3% versus 51.7%, p < 0.0001), and therefore received post-chemotherapy surgery more frequently than NTER patients (46.8% versus 32.0%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Teratoma in the primary tumour of patients with metastatic NSGCT negatively impacts on survival in the good and intermediate, but not in the poor IGCCCG prognostic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel Bührer
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David D'Haese
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Costantine Albany
- Horizon Oncology Research, 1345 Unity PI Ste 345, Lafayette, IN, United States of America
| | - Alexey Tryakin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Olof Stahl
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy and the Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group (IGG), Italy
| | - Fay H Cafferty
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs University Hospital and Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Xavier Garcia-Del-Muro
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL Institute of Research, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Urology, University Hospital Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia; Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Eric Winquist
- Division of Medical Oncology, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Grimison
- Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Darren R Feldman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, United States of America; Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Angelika Terbuch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with Section Pneumology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Helene Negaard
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - David J Vaughn
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Laurence Collette
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Universita della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Beyer
- University Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Almeida JR, Martino R, Hosni A, Goldstein DP, Bratman SV, Chepeha DB, Waldron JN, Weinreb I, Perez-Ordonez B, Yu E, Metser U, Hansen AR, Xu W, Su SJ, Kim J. Transoral Robotic Surgery and Radiation Volume Deintensification in Unknown Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Neck: The Phase 2 FIND Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024:2817533. [PMID: 38602692 PMCID: PMC11009865 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.0423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Importance Patients with unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma (CUP) with cervical metastases typically receive comprehensive radiotherapy (RT) of the pharynx and bilateral neck. Typically, these patients receive comprehensive RT of the pharynx and bilateral neck that may produce treatment-related toxic effects. Objective To determine whether localization of occult oropharyngeal cancers with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) combined with reduced pharyngeal and neck RT volumes provides acceptable disease control. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2, single-group nonrandomized controlled trial at a single institution accrued 32 prospective participants with p16-positive CUP without a primary squamous cell carcinoma on examination and imaging from 2017 to 2019, and 24-month follow-up. The data analysis was conducted from January 2021 to June 2022. Intervention Diagnostic- (n = 13) or therapeutic-intent (n = 9) TORS, with pharyngeal-sparing radiotherapy (PSRT) prescribed for negative margins or pT0, and unilateral neck RT (UNRT) prescribed for unilateral lymphadenopathy with lateralized primary tumor or pT0. Main Outcomes and Measures Out-of-radiation treatment volume failure (<15% was hypothesized to be acceptable) and reports of local and regional recurrence, overall survival, toxic effects, swallowing outcomes (per the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory), and videofluoroscopic swallow (per Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxic Effects [DIGEST]) ratings. Results The study sample comprised 22 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [5.7] years; 3 [14%] females and 19 [86%] male) with CUP. Of these, 19 patients (86%) had tumor stage cN1; 2 (9%), cN2; and 1 (5%), cN3. Five patients (23%), 14 patients (64%), and 3 patients (13%) had 0, 1, or 2 primary tumors, respectively. Twenty patients received RT; of these, 9 patients (45%) underwent PSRT and 10 patients (50%), UNRT. In the diagnostic-intent group, 8 patients (62%) and 5 patients (38%) underwent RT and RT-concurrent chemotherapy, respectively. In the therapeutic-intent group, 6 patients (67%) and 1 patient (11%) received adjuvant RT-concurrent chemotherapy, respectively; 2 patients declined RT. Two-year out-of-radiation treatment volume failure, locoregional control, distant metastasis control, and overall survival were 0%, 100%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 surgical, acute, and late toxic effects occurred in 2 (9%), 5 (23%), and 1 (5%) patients, respectively. PSRT was associated with lower RT dose to superior constrictors (37 vs 53 Gy; mean difference, 16 Gy; 95% CI, 6.4, 24.9), smaller decline in swallowing scores during treatment (19.3 vs 39.7; mean difference, -20.4; 95% CI, -34.1 to -6.1), and fewer patients with worsening DIGEST grade on findings of videofluoroscopic swallow studies at 2 years (0% vs 60%; difference, 60%; 95% CI, 30% to 90%). Conclusions and Relevance These findings indicate that TORS for p16-positive CUP allows RT volume deintensification with excellent outcomes and support future investigation in randomized clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03281499.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R. de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rosemary Martino
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Swallowing Lab, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David P. Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott V. Bratman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Douglas B. Chepeha
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John N. Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ilan Weinreb
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Eugene Yu
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Susie Jie Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee CL, O'Kane GM, Mason WP, Zhang WJ, Spiliopoulou P, Hansen AR, Grant RC, Knox JJ, Stockley TL, Zadeh G, Chen EX. Circulating Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate as a Potential Biomarker for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2024; 23:394-399. [PMID: 38015561 PMCID: PMC10911702 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) enzymes catalyze the decarboxylation of isocitrate to alpha-ketoglutarate (αKG). IDH1/2 mutations preferentially convert αKG to R-2-hydroxyglutarate (R2HG), resulting in R2HG accumulation in tumor tissues. We investigated circulating 2-hydroxyglutate (2HG) as potential biomarkers for patients with IDH-mutant (IDHmt) cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). R2HG and S-2-hydroxyglutarate (S2HG) levels in blood and tumor tissues were analyzed in a discovery cohort of patients with IDHmt glioma and CCA. Results were validated in cohorts of patients with CCA and clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. The R2HG/S2HG ratio (rRS) was significantly elevated in tumor tissues, but not in blood for patients with IDHmt glioma, while circulating rRS was elevated in patients with IDHmt CCA. There were overlap distributions of circulating R2HG and total 2HG in patients with both IDHmt and wild-type (IDHwt) CCA, while there was minimal overlap in rRS values between patients with IDHmt and IDHwt CCA. Using the rRS cut-off value of 1.5, the sensitivity of rRS was 90% and specificity was 96.8%. Circulating rRS is significantly increased in patients with IDHmt CCA compare with patients with IDHwt CCA. Circulating rRS is a sensitive and specific surrogate biomarker for IDH1/2 mutations in CCA. It can potentially be used as a tool for monitoring IDH-targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cha Len Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Grainne M. O'Kane
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Warren P. Mason
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- MacFeeters Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wen-Jiang Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pavlina Spiliopoulou
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert C. Grant
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer J. Knox
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tracy L. Stockley
- Advanced Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric X. Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Ezzi E, Mittal A, Veitch ZW, Zahralliyali A, Mejia NMD, Abdeljalil O, Alqaisi H, Kumar V, Hansen AR, Fallah-Rad N, Sridhar SS. The Survival Outcomes of the Metastatic Nonclear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Immunotherapy Era: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience. J Kidney Cancer VHL 2024; 11:41-48. [PMID: 38450000 PMCID: PMC10915653 DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i1.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy (IO) with or without targeted therapy (TT) is the standard treatment for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The evidence supporting their use in metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) subtypes is based on small prospective trials and retrospective analyses. Here, we report survival outcomes for patients with metastatic nccRCC treated with IO and/or TT at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Demographics, disease characteristics, and survival outcomes were collected retrospectively. Overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rates (ORR) were calculated. We identified 69 patients with metastatic nccRCC treated with IO and/or TT as the first-line treatment, and 36 (52.1%) patients as the second-line treatment. Median OS of the first line IO recipients (n = 12) and non-IO recipients (n = 57) was not reached (NR) and 17.2 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 7.3-27.0; P = 0.23), respectively. Median PFS of first-line IO recipients and non-IO recipients was NR and 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.7-5.6; P = 0.019), respectively. The ORR of IO recipients versus non-IO recipients was 50% versus 12.3% (P = 0.007). Median OS of the second-line IO recipients (n = 8) and non-IO recipients (n = 28) was NR and 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.2-9.3; P = 0.003), respectively. Median PFS of second-line IO recipients and non-IO recipients was 4.8 months (95% CI: 2.7-6.8) and 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.7; P = 0.014), respectively. ORR of IO recipients and non-IO recipients was 37.5% and 3.5%, respectively; P = 0.028. While the number of patients included in our retrospective review was small, our analysis suggested that patients with nccRCC have improved survival outcomes with IO treatment. Validation of prospective dataset is required before widespread clinical utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmail Al-Ezzi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abhenil Mittal
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zachary W. Veitch
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, ON, Canada
| | - Amer Zahralliyali
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nely Mercy Diaz Mejia
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Osama Abdeljalil
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Husam Alqaisi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vikaash Kumar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD 4113, Australia
| | - Nazanin Fallah-Rad
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S. Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stutheit-Zhao EY, Sanz-Garcia E, Liu ZA, Wong D, Marsh K, Abdul Razak AR, Spreafico A, Bedard PL, Hansen AR, Lheureux S, Torti D, Lam B, Yang SYC, Burgener J, Luo P, Zeng Y, Cheng N, Awadalla P, Bratman SV, Ohashi PS, Pugh TJ, Siu LL. Early changes in tumor-naive cell-free methylomes and fragmentomes predict outcomes in pembrolizumab-treated solid tumors. Cancer Discov 2024:734858. [PMID: 38393391 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Early kinetics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma predict response to pembrolizumab, but typically requires sequencing of matched tumor tissue or fixed gene panels. We analyzed genome-wide methylation and fragment length profiles using cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) in 204 plasma samples from 87 patients before and during treatment with pembrolizumab from a pan-cancer phase II investigator-initiated trial (INSPIRE). We trained a pan-cancer methylation signature using independent methylation array data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to quantify a cancer-specific methylation (CSM) and fragment length score (FLS) for each sample. CSM and FLS are strongly correlated with tumor-informed ctDNA levels. Early kinetics of CSM predict overall survival and progression-free survival, independently of tumor type, PD-L1, and tumor mutation burden. Early kinetics of FLS are associated with overall survival independently of CSM. Our tumor-naïve mutation-agnostic ctDNA approach integrating methylomics and fragmentomics could predict outcomes in patients treated with pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Derek Wong
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kayla Marsh
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Dax Torti
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Canada
| | - Bernard Lam
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Justin Burgener
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ping Luo
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hilton JF, Ott PA, Hansen AR, Li Z, Mathew M, Messina CH, Dave V, Ji X, Karpinich NO, Hirschfeld S, Ballas M, Zandberg DP. INDUCE-2: A Phase I/II, open-label, two-part study of feladilimab in combination with tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2024; 73:44. [PMID: 38349570 PMCID: PMC10864474 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03623-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Combining immunotherapies with distinct mechanisms of action has the potential to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes. The inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS) agonist feladilimab is directed at enhancing T-cell activation and function, thereby promoting an antitumor response. INDUCE-2 (NCT03693612) was a Phase I/II, open-label, two-part study evaluating the anti-ICOS agonist feladilimab in combination with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody tremelimumab in patients with select advanced solid tumors. Objectives of Part 1 were to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of feladilimab in combination with tremelimumab. In Part 2, the antitumor activity of the combination (administered at the RP2D determined in Part 1) was to be assessed in patients with relapsed/refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Primary endpoints included the rates of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), AEs of special interest, and serious AEs. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, while biomarker assessment was exploratory. A total of 26 patients were enrolled, 18 (69%) of whom had completed the study at end date. One patient, in the highest dose group (24/225 mg feladilimab/tremelimumab), experienced a DLT 18 days after the first dose of study treatment. All patients experienced at least one AE; AEs led to treatment discontinuation in four (15%) patients. Partial response was observed in one patient. Feladilimab in combination with tremelimumab was well-tolerated but showed limited efficacy. Based on the totality of data from Part 1, it was decided not to continue with Part 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John F Hilton
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Zujun Li
- New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthen Mathew
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dan P Zandberg
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 5150 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Armstrong AJ, Geva R, Chung HC, Lemech C, Miller WH, Hansen AR, Lee JS, Tsai F, Solomon BJ, Kim TM, Rolfo C, Giranda V, Ren Y, Liu F, Kandala B, Freshwater T, Wang JS. CXCR2 antagonist navarixin in combination with pembrolizumab in select advanced solid tumors: a phase 2 randomized trial. Invest New Drugs 2024; 42:145-159. [PMID: 38324085 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-023-01410-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) has a role in tumor progression, lineage plasticity, and reduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Preclinical evidence suggests potential benefit of CXCR2 inhibition in multiple solid tumors. In this phase 2 study (NCT03473925), adults with previously treated advanced or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC), or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized 1:1 to the CXCR2 antagonist navarixin 30 or 100 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks up to 35 cycles. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) and safety. Of 105 patients (CRPC, n=40; MSS CRC, n=40; NSCLC, n=25), 3 had a partial response (2 CRPC, 1 MSS CRC) for ORRs of 5%, 2.5%, and 0%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 1.8-2.4 months without evidence of a dose-response relationship, and the study was closed at a prespecified interim analysis for lack of efficacy. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2/48 patients (4%) receiving navarixin 30 mg and 3/48 (6%) receiving navarixin 100 mg; events included grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 transaminase elevation, hepatitis, and pneumonitis. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 70/105 patients (67%) and led to treatment discontinuation in 7/105 (7%). Maximal reductions from baseline in absolute neutrophil count were 44.5%-48.2% (cycle 1) and 37.5%-44.2% (cycle 2) and occurred within 6-12 hours postdose in both groups. Navarixin plus pembrolizumab did not demonstrate sufficient efficacy in this study. Safety and tolerability of the combination were manageable. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03473925).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Ravit Geva
- Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hyun Cheol Chung
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Wilson H Miller
- Segal Cancer Center, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Jong-Seok Lee
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | | | | | - Tae Min Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Christian Rolfo
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Fang Liu
- Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Judy S Wang
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guram K, Huang J, Mouchati C, Abdallah N, Jani C, Navani V, Xie W, El Zarif T, Adib E, Gebrael G, Agarwal N, Li H, Labaki C, Labban M, Ruiz Morales JM, Choueiri TK, Chin Heng DY, Mittal A, Hansen AR, Rose BS, McKay RR. Comparison of outcomes for Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38297953 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing data on the impact of Hispanic ethnicity on outcomes for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is mixed. The authors investigated outcomes of Hispanic and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with advanced RCC receiving systemic therapy at large academic cancer centers using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database (IMDC). METHODS Eligible patients included non-Black Hispanic and NHW patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC initiating systemic therapy. Overall survival (OS) and time to first-line treatment failure (TTF) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of ethnicity on OS and TTF were estimated by Cox regression hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS A total of 1563 patients (181 Hispanic and 1382 NHW) (mostly males [73.8%] with clear cell RCC [81.5%] treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] monotherapy [69.9%]) were included. IMDC risk groups were similar between groups. Hispanic patients were younger at initial diagnosis (median 57 vs. 59 years, p = .015) and less likely to have greater than one metastatic site (60.8% vs. 76.8%, p < .001) or bone metastases (23.8% vs. 33.4%, p = .009). Median OS and TTF was 38.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.1-59.2) versus 35.7 months (95% CI, 31.9-39.2) and 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.0) versus 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.9-8.1), respectively, in Hispanic versus NHW patients. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, no statistically significant differences were observed in OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.86-1.31, p = .56) or TTF (adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.26, p = .50). CONCLUSIONS The authors did not observe statistically significant differences in OS or TTF between Hispanic and NHW patients with advanced RCC. Receiving treatment at tertiary cancer centers may mitigate observed disparities in cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kripa Guram
- University of California, San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jiaming Huang
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christian Mouchati
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Nour Abdallah
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Chinmay Jani
- Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- University of Miami-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center/Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Vishal Navani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Talal El Zarif
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elio Adib
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Georges Gebrael
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Haoran Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Chris Labaki
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Yick Chin Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Abhenil Mittal
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brent S Rose
- University of California, San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- University of California, San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Conduit C, Lewin J, Weickhardt A, Lynam J, Wong S, Grimison P, Sengupta S, Pranavan G, Parnis F, Bastick P, Campbell D, Hansen AR, Leonard M, McJannett M, Stockler MR, Gibbs P, Toner G, Davis ID, Tran B, Kuchel A. Patterns of Relapse in Australian Patients With Clinical Stage 1 Testicular Cancer: Utility of the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group Surveillance Recommendations. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:973-980. [PMID: 37327464 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE International guidelines advocate for active surveillance as the preferred treatment strategy for patients with stage 1 testicular cancer after orchidectomy although a personalized discussion is required. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted an analysis of individuals registered in iTestis, Australia's testicular cancer registry, to describe the patterns of relapse and outcomes of patients treated in Australia where the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group Surveillance Recommendations are widely adopted. RESULTS A total of 650 individuals diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 were included, 63% (411 of 650) seminoma and 37% (239 of 650) nonseminoma. The median age was 34 years (range 14-74). 26% (106 of 411) with seminoma and 15% (36 of 239) nonseminoma received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 43 months (range 0-267) postorchidectomy, relapse occurred in 10% (43 of 411) of seminoma and 18% (43 of 239) of nonseminoma. The two-year relapse-free survival was 92% (95% CI, 89 to 95) and 82% (95% CI, 78 to 87) in seminoma and nonseminoma, respectively. All relapses (86 of 86) were detected at a routine surveillance visit; 98% (85 of 86) were asymptomatic and detected solely through imaging (62 of 86, 72%), tumor markers (6 of 86, 7%), or a combination (17 of 86, 20%). The most common relapse site was isolated retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (53 of 86, 62%). No nonpulmonary visceral metastases occurred. At relapse, 98% (84 of 86) had International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good prognosis; 2 of 86 intermediate prognosis (both nonseminoma). No deaths occurred. CONCLUSION In our cohort of stage 1 testicular cancer, where national surveillance recommendations have been widely adopted, recurrences were detected at routine surveillance visits and, almost exclusively, asymptomatic with IGCCCG good-prognosis disease. This provides reassurance that active surveillance is safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Conduit
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Weickhardt
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - James Lynam
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia
- University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Shirley Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Urology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Ganes Pranavan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia
| | - Francis Parnis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Icon Cancer Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Patricia Bastick
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Southside Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, St George/Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, NSW, Australia
| | - David Campbell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Matt Leonard
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret McJannett
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin R Stockler
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia
| | - Guy Toner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Anna Kuchel
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Genta S, Lajkosz K, Yee NR, Spiliopoulou P, Heirali A, Hansen AR, Siu LL, Saibil S, Stayner LA, Yanekina M, Sauder MB, Keshavarzi S, Salawu A, Vornicova O, Butler MO, Bedard PL, Razak ARA, Rottapel R, Chruscinski A, Coburn B, Spreafico A. Autoimmune PaneLs as PrEdictors of Toxicity in Patients TReated with Immune Checkpoint InhibiTors (ALERT). J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023; 42:276. [PMID: 37865776 PMCID: PMC10589949 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02851-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a significant proportion of patients. The mechanisms underlying irAEs development are mostly unknown and might involve multiple immune effectors, such as T cells, B cells and autoantibodies (AutoAb). METHODS We used custom autoantigen (AutoAg) microarrays to profile AutoAb related to irAEs in patients receiving ICI. Plasma was collected before and after ICI from cancer patients participating in two clinical trials (NCT03686202, NCT02644369). A one-time collection was obtained from healthy controls for comparison. Custom arrays with 162 autoAg were used to detect IgG and IgM reactivities. Differences of median fluorescent intensity (MFI) were analyzed with Wilcoxon sign rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test. MFI 500 was used as threshold to define autoAb reactivity. RESULTS A total of 114 patients and 14 healthy controls were included in this study. irAEs of grade (G) ≥ 2 occurred in 37/114 patients (32%). We observed a greater number of IgG and IgM reactivities in pre-ICI collections from patients versus healthy controls (62 vs 32 p < 0.001). Patients experiencing irAEs G ≥ 2 demonstrated pre-ICI IgG reactivity to a greater number of AutoAg than patients who did not develop irAEs (39 vs 33 p = 0.040). We observed post-treatment increase of IgM reactivities in subjects experiencing irAEs G ≥ 2 (29 vs 35, p = 0.021) and a decrease of IgG levels after steroids (38 vs 28, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Overall, these results support the potential role of autoAb in irAEs etiology and evolution. A prospective study is ongoing to validate our findings (NCT04107311).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Genta
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Noelle R Yee
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pavlina Spiliopoulou
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alya Heirali
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sam Saibil
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lee-Anne Stayner
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maryia Yanekina
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maxwell B Sauder
- Division of Dematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sareh Keshavarzi
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abdulazeez Salawu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Olga Vornicova
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus O Butler
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Rottapel
- Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Bryan Coburn
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salawu A, Wang BX, Han M, Geady C, Heirali A, Berman HK, Pfister TD, Hernando-Calvo A, Al-Ezzi EM, Stayner LA, Gupta AA, Ayodele O, Lam B, Hansen AR, Spreafico A, Bedard PL, Butler MO, Avery L, Coburn B, Haibe-Kains B, Siu LL, Abdul Razak AR. Safety, Immunologic, and Clinical Activity of Durvalumab in Combination with Olaparib or Cediranib in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: Results of the DAPPER Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4128-4138. [PMID: 37566240 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-inflamed (cold) tumors such as leiomyosarcoma do not benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) monotherapy. Combining ICB with angiogenesis or PARP inhibitors may increase tumor immunogenicity by altering the immune cell composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The DAPPER phase II study evaluated the safety, immunologic, and clinical activity of ICB-based combinations in pretreated patients with leiomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive durvalumab 1,500 mg IV every 4 weeks with either olaparib 300 mg twice a day orally (Arm A) or cediranib 20 mg every day orally 5 days/week (Arm B) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Paired tumor biopsies, serial radiologic assessments and stool collections were performed. Primary endpoints were safety and immune cell changes in the TME. Objective responses and survival were correlated with transcriptomic, radiomic, and microbiome parameters. RESULTS Among 30 heavily pretreated patients (15 on each arm), grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 3 (20%) and 2 (13%) on Arms A and B, respectively. On Arm A, 1 patient achieved partial response (PR) with increase in CD8 T cells and macrophages in the TME during treatment, while 4 had stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months. No patients on Arm B achieved PR or SD ≥ 6 months. Transcriptome analysis showed that baseline M1-macrophage and B-cell activity were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Durvalumab plus olaparib increased immune cell infiltration of TME with clinical benefit in some patients with leiomyosarcoma. Baseline M1-macrophage and B-cell activity may identify patients with leiomyosarcoma with favorable outcomes on immunotherapy and should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulazeez Salawu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ben X Wang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ming Han
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caryn Geady
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alya Heirali
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hal K Berman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas D Pfister
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alberto Hernando-Calvo
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Esmail Mutahar Al-Ezzi
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lee-Anne Stayner
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abha A Gupta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olubukola Ayodele
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bernard Lam
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus O Butler
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Avery
- Department of Statistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Benjamin Haibe-Kains
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fleshner NE, Sayyid RK, Hansen AR, Chin JLK, Fernandes R, Winquist E, van der Kwast T, Sweet J, Lajkosz K, Kenk M, Hersey K, Veloso R, Berlin D, Herrera-Caceres JO, Sridhar S, Moussa M, Finelli A, Hamilton RJ, Kulkarni GS, Zlotta AR, Joshua AM. Neoadjuvant Cabazitaxel plus Abiraterone/Leuprolide Acetate in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer: ACDC-RP Phase II Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3867-3874. [PMID: 37439809 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early treatment intensification with neoadjuvant therapy may improve outcomes in patients with high-risk, localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Our objective was to compare pathologic, oncologic, and safety outcomes of neoadjuvant abiraterone acetate plus leuprolide acetate with or without cabazitaxel prior to radical prostatectomy in patients with localized, high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, multicenter, phase II trial randomized men with clinically localized, D'Amico high-risk prostate cancer to neoadjuvant abiraterone acetate (1,000 mg/day) and leuprolide acetate (22.5 mg every 3 months) with or without cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2) prior to radical prostatectomy. The primary outcome was pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD). Secondary outcomes included surgical margins, lymph node involvement, pathologic stage, 12-month biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) rates, and safety profile. RESULTS The per-protocol population consisted of 70 patients [cabazitaxel arm (Arm A): 37, no cabazitaxel arm (Arm B): 33]. Median patient age and prostate-specific antigen levels were 63.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 58.0-68.0] and 21.9 ng/mL (IQR, 14.6-42.8), respectively. pCR/MRD occurred in 16 (43.2%) versus 15 patients (45.5%) in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.85). pCR occurred in two (5.4%) versus three patients (9.1%) in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.66). Patients with ≤ 25% total biopsy cores positive had increased odds of pCR/MRD (P = 0.04). Patients with pCR/MRD had superior 12-month BRFS rates (96.0% vs. 62.0%, P = 0.03). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 42.5% and 23.7% of patients in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant cabazitaxel addition to abiraterone acetate/leuprolide acetate prior to radical prostatectomy did not improve pCR/MRD in clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph L K Chin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ricardo Fernandes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joan Sweet
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Miran Kenk
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Hersey
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosette Veloso
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doron Berlin
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaime O Herrera-Caceres
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srikala Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Madeleine Moussa
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Department of Surgery, Urology, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hernando‐Calvo A, Malone E, Day D, Prawira A, Weinreb I, Yang SYC, Wong H, Rodriguez A, Jennings S, Eliason A, Wang L, Spreafico A, Siu LL, Hansen AR. Selinexor for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic salivary gland tumors: Results from the GEMS-001 clinical trial. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20299-20310. [PMID: 37818869 PMCID: PMC10652322 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the activity of selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, in patients with recurrent or metastatic salivary gland tumors (SGT). METHODS GEMS-001 is an open-label Phase 2 study for patients with recurrent or metastatic SGT with two parts. In Part 1 of the protocol, patients had tumor samples profiled with targeted next generation sequencing as well as immunohistochemistry for androgen receptor, HER-2 and ALK. For Part 2, patients with no targeted therapies available were eligible to receive selinexor 60 mg given twice weekly every 28 days. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and prevalence of druggable alterations across SGT. RESULTS One hundred patients were enrolled in GEMS-001 and underwent genomic and immunohistochemistry profiling. A total of 21 patients who lacked available matched therapies were treated with selinexor. SGT subtypes (WHO classification) included adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 10), salivary duct carcinoma (n = 3), acinic cell carcinoma (n = 2), myoepithelial carcinoma (n = 2), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (n = 2) and other (n = 2). Of 18 evaluable patients, stable disease (SD) was observed in 17 patients (94%) (SD ≥6 months in 7 patients (39%)). However, no objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 4.9 months (95% confidence interval, 3.4-10). The most common treatment-related Grade 1-2 adverse events were nausea [17 patients (81%)], fatigue [16 patients (76%)], and dysgeusia [12 patients (57%)]. Most common treatment-related Grade 3-4 adverse events were hyponatremia [3 patients (14%)], neutrophil count decrease [3 patients (14%)] and cataracts [2 patients (10%)]. No treatment-related deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS Although tumor reduction was observed across participants, single agent selinexor anti-tumor activity was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Hernando‐Calvo
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Eoghan Malone
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Daphne Day
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Amy Prawira
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Ilan Weinreb
- Princess Margaret Cancer CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | - Horace Wong
- Princess Margaret Cancer CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | | | | | - Lisa Wang
- Princess Margaret Cancer CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Lillian L. Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vieito M, Moreno V, Spreafico A, Brana I, Wang JS, Preis M, Hernández T, Genta S, Hansen AR, Doger B, Galvao V, Lenox L, Brown RJ, Kalota A, Mehta J, Pastore F, Patel B, Mistry P, Gu J, Lauring J, Patel MR. Phase 1 Study of JNJ-64619178, a Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5 Inhibitor, in Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3592-3602. [PMID: 37491846 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this first-in-human, Phase 1, open-label, multicenter study, we evaluated JNJ-64619178, a selective and potent PRMT5 inhibitor, in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors or non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and to identify a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of JNJ-64619178. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors or NHL and measurable disease received escalating doses of JNJ-64619178 following two schedules (Schedule A: 14 days on/7 days off; Schedule B: every day on a 21-day cycle). Safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical activity were evaluated. RESULTS Ninety patients received JNJ-64619178. Thrombocytopenia was identified as the only dose-limiting toxicity. JNJ-64619178 showed dose-proportional PK and robust target engagement, as measured by plasma symmetric dimethylarginine, across all dose levels. The objective response rate was 5.6% (5 of 90). Patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had an ORR of 11.5% (3 of 26) and a median progression-free survival of 19.1 months. CONCLUSIONS JNJ-64619178 demonstrated manageable dose-dependent toxicity and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in ACC and other tumor types. Plasma exposure was dose dependent, and target inhibition was maintained with intermittent and continuous dosing. On the basis of safety, clinical activity, PK, and PD findings, two provisional RP2Ds were selected: 1.5 mg intermittently and 1.0 mg once daily. Aside from ACC, clinical benefit was limited, and biomarkers to enrich for responsiveness to PRMT5 inhibition will be needed for further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vieito
- Vall de Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Moreno
- START MADRID-FJD, Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid Spain
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene Brana
- Vall de Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judy S Wang
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, Florida
| | | | | | - Sofia Genta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bernard Doger
- START MADRID-FJD, Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid Spain
| | | | - Laurie Lenox
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Regina J Brown
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Anna Kalota
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Jaydeep Mehta
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Bharvin Patel
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Pankaj Mistry
- Janssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, United Kingdom
| | - Junchen Gu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Josh Lauring
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania
| | - Manish R Patel
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Janse van Rensburg HJ, Liu Z, Watson GA, Veitch ZW, Shepshelovich D, Spreafico A, Abdul Razak AR, Bedard PL, Siu LL, Minasian L, Hansen AR. A tailored phase I-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey to capture the patient experience of symptomatic adverse events. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:612-619. [PMID: 37419999 PMCID: PMC10421959 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02307-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient perspectives are fundamental to defining tolerability of investigational anti-neoplastic therapies in clinical trials. Phase I trials present a unique challenge in designing tools for efficiently collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) given the difficulty of anticipating adverse events of relevance. However, phase I trials also offer an opportunity for investigators to optimize drug dosing based on tolerability for future larger-scale trials and in eventual clinical practice. Existing tools for comprehensively capturing PROs are generally cumbersome and are not routinely used in phase I trials. METHODS Here, we describe the creation of a tailored survey based on the National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE for collecting patients' perspectives on symptomatic adverse events in phase I trials in oncology. RESULTS We describe our stepwise approach to condensing the original 78-symptom library into a modified 30 term core list of symptoms which can be efficiently applied. We further show that our tailored survey aligns with phase I trialists' perspectives on symptoms of relevance. CONCLUSIONS This tailored survey represents the first PRO tool developed specifically for assessing tolerability in the phase I oncology population. We provide recommendations for future work aimed at integrating this survey into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena J Janse van Rensburg
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhihui Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Geoffrey A Watson
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zachary W Veitch
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Shepshelovich
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Medicine D, Tel-Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lori Minasian
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Taylor K, Zou J, Magalhaes M, Oliva M, Spreafico A, Hansen AR, McDade SS, Coyle VM, Lawler M, Elimova E, Bratman SV, Siu LL. Circulating tumour DNA kinetics in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2023; 188:29-38. [PMID: 37182343 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has become a standard of care in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (R/M HNSCC). However, only a subset of patients benefit from treatment. Quantification of plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) levels and on-treatment kinetics may permit real-time assessment of disease burden under selective pressures of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS R/M HNSCC patients treated with systemic therapy, platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) or ICB, underwent serial liquid biopsy sampling. Biomarkers tested included ctDNA measured by CAncer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq) and markers of host inflammation measured by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). RESULTS Among 53 eligible patients, 16 (30%) received CT, 30 (57%) ICB [anti-PD1/L1] monotherapy and 7 (13%) combination immunotherapy (IO). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.8 months (95% CI, 1.3-4.3) and 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.6-10.8), respectively. Seven (13%) patients experienced a partial response and 21 (40%) derived clinical benefit. At baseline, median ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) was 4.3%. Baseline ctDNA abundance was not associated with OS (p = 0.56) nor PFS (p = 0.54). However, a change in ctDNA VAF after one cycle of treatment (ΔVAF (T1-2)) was predictive of both PFS (p< 0.01) and OS (p< 0.01). Additionally, decrease in ΔVAF identified patients with longer OS despite early radiological progression, 8.2 vs 4.6 months, hazard ratio 0.44 (95% CI, 0.19-0.87) p = 0.03. After incorporating NLR and PLR into multivariable Cox models, ctDNA ∆VAF retained an association with OS. CONCLUSIONS Early dynamic changes in ctDNA abundance, after one cycle of treatment, compared to baseline predicted both OS and PFS in R/M HNSCC patients on systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Taylor
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Jinfeng Zou
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marcos Magalhaes
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Oliva
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simon S McDade
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Vicky M Coyle
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Elena Elimova
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott V Bratman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology & Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Al-Ezzi EM, Zahralliyali A, Hansen AR, Hamilton RJ, Crump M, Kuruvilla J, Wood L, Nappi L, Kollmannsberger CK, North SA, Winquist E, Soulières D, Hotte SJ, Jiang DM. The Use of Salvage Chemotherapy for Patients with Relapsed Testicular Germ Cell Tumor (GCT) in Canada: A National Survey. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6166-6176. [PMID: 37504318 PMCID: PMC10378146 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although metastatic germ cell tumor (GCT) is highly curable with initial cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT), 20-30% of patients relapse. Salvage CT options include conventional (CDCT) and high dose chemotherapy (HDCT), however definitive comparative data remain lacking. We aimed to characterize the contemporary practice patterns of salvage CT across Canada. METHODS We conducted a 30-question online survey for Canadian medical and hematological oncologists with experience in treating GCT, assessing treatment availability, patient selection, and management strategies used for relapsed GCT patients. RESULTS There were 30 respondents from 18 cancer centers across eight provinces. The most common CDCT regimens used were TIP (64%) and VIP (25%). HDCT was available in 13 centers (70%). The HDCT regimen used included carboplatin and etoposide for two cycles (76% in 7 centers), three cycles (6% in 2 centers), and the TICE protocol (11%, in 2 centers). "Bridging" CDCT was used by 65% of respondents. Post-HDCT treatments considered include surgical resection for residual disease (87.5%), maintenance etoposide (6.3%), and surveillance only (6.3%). CONCLUSIONS HDCT is the most commonly used GCT salvage strategy in Canada. Significant differences exist in the treatment availability, selection, and delivery of HDCT, highlighting the need for standardization of care for patients with relapsed testicular GCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmail M Al-Ezzi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Amer Zahralliyali
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD 4113, Australia
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Michael Crump
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - John Kuruvilla
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Lori Wood
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Department of Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Christian K Kollmannsberger
- Department of Medicine, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Scott A North
- Division of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Denis Soulières
- Département Hématologie-Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada
| | - Sebastien J Hotte
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Di Maria Jiang
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spreafico A, Heirali AA, Araujo DV, Tan TJ, Oliva M, Schneeberger PHH, Chen B, Wong MK, Stayner LA, Hansen AR, Saibil SD, Wang BX, Cochrane K, Sherriff K, Allen-Vercoe E, Xu W, Siu LL, Coburn B. First-in-class Microbial Ecosystem Therapeutic 4 (MET4) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors (MET4-IO trial). Ann Oncol 2023; 34:520-530. [PMID: 36863483 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intestinal microbiome has been associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in humans and causally implicated in ICI responsiveness in animal models. Two recent human trials demonstrated that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from ICI responders can rescue ICI responses in refractory melanoma, but FMT has specific limitations to scaled use. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted an early-phase clinical trial of a cultivated, orally delivered 30-species microbial consortium (Microbial Ecosystem Therapeutic 4, MET4) designed for co-administration with ICIs as an alternative to FMT and assessed safety, tolerability and ecological responses in patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS The trial achieved its primary safety and tolerability outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary ecological outcomes; however, differences in MET4 species relative abundance were evident after randomization that varied by patient and species. Increases in the relative abundance of several MET4 taxa, including Enterococcus and Bifidobacterium, taxa previously associated with ICI responsiveness, were observed and MET4 engraftment was associated with decreases in plasma and stool primary bile acids. CONCLUSIONS This trial is the first report of the use of a microbial consortium as an alternative to FMT in advanced cancer patients receiving ICI and the results justify the further development of microbial consortia as a therapeutic co-intervention for ICI treatment in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto; Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto.
| | - A A Heirali
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - D V Araujo
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Base, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - T J Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto; Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - M Oliva
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Catala d' Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P H H Schneeberger
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Department of Medical Parasitology and Infection Biology, Allschwil; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B Chen
- Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - M K Wong
- Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto
| | - L-A Stayner
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - A R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - S D Saibil
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - B X Wang
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | | | | | | | - W Xu
- Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - L L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto; Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
| | - B Coburn
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harrington KJ, Ferris RL, Gillison M, Tahara M, Argiris A, Fayette J, Schenker M, Bratland Å, Walker JWT, Grell P, Even C, Chung CH, Redman R, Coutte A, Salas S, Grant C, de Azevedo S, Soulières D, Hansen AR, Wei L, Khan TA, Miller-Moslin K, Roberts M, Haddad R. Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab Alone for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Phase 2 CheckMate 714 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:779-789. [PMID: 37022706 PMCID: PMC10080406 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance There remains an unmet need to improve clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). Objective To evaluate clinical benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in patients with R/M SCCHN. Design, Setting, and Participants The CheckMate 714, double-blind, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 83 sites in 21 countries between October 20, 2016, and January 23, 2019. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had platinum-refractory or platinum-eligible R/M SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for R/M disease. Data were analyzed from October 20, 2016 (first patient, first visit), to March 8, 2019 (primary database lock), and April 6, 2020 (overall survival database lock). Interventions Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks) or nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) plus placebo for up to 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or consent withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response between treatment arms by blinded independent central review in the population with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Exploratory end points included safety. Results Of 425 included patients, 241 (56.7%; median age, 59 [range, 24-82] years; 194 males [80.5%]) had platinum-refractory disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 159; nivolumab, n = 82) and 184 (43.3%; median age, 62 [range, 33-88] years; 152 males [82.6%]) had platinum-eligible disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 123; nivolumab, n = 61). At primary database lock, the ORR in the population with platinum-refractory disease was 13.2% (95% CI, 8.4%-19.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 18.3% (95% CI, 10.6%-28.4%) with nivolumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95.5% CI, 0.33-1.43; P = .29). Median duration of response for nivolumab plus ipilimumab was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 11.0 months to NR) vs 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.1 months to NR) for nivolumab. In the population with platinum-eligible disease, the ORR was 20.3% (95% CI, 13.6%-28.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 29.5% (95% CI, 18.5%-42.6%) with nivolumab. The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab were 15.8% (25 of 158) vs 14.6% (12 of 82) in the population with platinum-refractory disease and 24.6% (30 of 122) vs 13.1% (8 of 61) in the population with platinum-eligible disease. Conclusions and Relevance The CheckMate 714 randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point of ORR benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with an acceptable safety profile. Research to identify patient subpopulations in R/M SCCHN that would benefit from nivolumab plus ipilimumab over nivolumab monotherapy is warranted. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02823574.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J. Harrington
- Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Maura Gillison
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Athanasios Argiris
- Hygeia Hospital, Marousi, Greece
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jérôme Fayette
- Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
- Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | - Peter Grell
- Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Rebecca Redman
- University of Louisville, Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | - Sébastien Salas
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Li Wei
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Robert Haddad
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sanz-Garcia E, Genta S, Chen X, Ou Q, Araujo DV, Abdul Razak AR, Hansen AR, Spreafico A, Bao H, Wu X, Siu LL, Bedard PL. Tumor-Naïve Circulating Tumor DNA as an Early Response Biomarker for Patients Treated With Immunotherapy in Early Phase Clinical Trials. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200509. [PMID: 37027812 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate early circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) kinetics using a tumor-naïve assay and correlate it with clinical outcomes in early phase immunotherapy (IO) trials. METHODS Plasma samples were analyzed using a 425-gene next-generation sequencing panel at baseline and before cycle 2 (3-4 weeks) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with investigational IO agents. Variant allele frequency (VAF) for mutations in each gene, mean VAF (mVAF) from all mutations, and change in mVAF between both time points were calculated. Hyperprogression (HyperPD) was measured using Matos and Caramella criteria. RESULTS A total of 162 plasma samples were collected from 81 patients with 27 different tumor types. Patients were treated in 37 different IO phase I/II trials, 72% of which involved a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. ctDNA was detected in 122 plasma samples (75.3%). A decrease in mVAF from baseline to precycle 2 was observed in 24 patients (37.5%) and was associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.77; P < .01) and overall survival (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.96; P = .03) compared with an increase. These differences were more marked if there was a >50% decrease in mVAF for both progression-free survival (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.62; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.6; P = .001). No differences in mVAF changes were observed between the HyperPD and progressive disease patients. CONCLUSION A decrease in ctDNA within 4 weeks of treatment was associated with treatment outcomes in patients in early phase IO trials. Tumor-naïve ctDNA assays may be useful for identifying early treatment benefits in phase I/II IO trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Sanz-Garcia
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sofia Genta
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Daniel V Araujo
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Base, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hua Bao
- Geneseeq Technology Inc, Toronto, Canada
| | - Xue Wu
- Geneseeq Technology Inc, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takemura K, Navani V, Ernst MS, Wells JC, Meza L, Pal SK, Lee JL, Li H, Agarwal N, Alva AS, Hansen AR, Basappa NS, Szabados B, Powles T, Tran B, Hocking CM, Beuselinck B, Yuasa T, Choueiri TK, Heng DYC. Characterization of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Experiencing Complete Response to First-line Therapies: Results From the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. J Urol 2023; 209:701-709. [PMID: 36573926 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials have demonstrated higher complete response rates in the immuno-oncology-based combination arms than in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor arms in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to characterize real-world patients who experienced complete response to the contemporary first-line therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium, response-evaluable patients who received frontline immuno-oncology-based combination therapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy were analyzed. Baseline characteristics of patients and post-landmark overall survival were compared based on best overall response, as per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS A total of 52 (4.6%) of 1,126 and 223 (3.0%) of 7,557 patients experienced complete response to immuno-oncology-based and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies, respectively (P = .005). An adjusted odds ratio for complete response achieved by immuno-oncology-based combination therapy (vs tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy) was 1.56 (95% CI 1.11-2.17; P = .009). Among patients who experienced complete response, the immuno-oncology-based cohort had a higher proportion of non-clear cell histology (15.9% and 4.7%; P = .016), sarcomatoid dedifferentiation (29.8% and 13.5%; P = .014), and multiple sites of metastases (80.4% and 50.0%; P < .001) than the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort. Complete response was independently associated with post-landmark overall survival benefit in both the immuno-oncology-based and tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohorts, giving respective adjusted hazard ratios of 0.17 (95% CI 0.04-0.72; P = .016) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.21-0.38; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The complete response rate was not as high in the real-world population as in the clinical trial population. Among those who experienced complete response, several adverse clinicopathological features were more frequently observed in the immuno-oncology-based cohort than in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cohort. Complete response was an indicator of favorable overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Takemura
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vishal Navani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew S Ernst
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Luis Meza
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Haoran Li
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ajjai S Alva
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naveen S Basappa
- Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bernadett Szabados
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Tran
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Feng G, Parthipan M, Breunis H, Puts M, Emmenegger U, Timilshina N, Hansen AR, Finelli A, Krzyzanowska MK, Matthew A, Clarke H, Mina DS, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Tomlinson G, Alibhai SMH. Feasibility and acceptability of remote symptom monitoring (RSM) in older adults during treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101469. [PMID: 36917921 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emerging data support multiple benefits of remote symptom monitoring (RSM) during chemotherapy to improve outcomes. However, these studies have not focused on older adults and do not include treatments beyond chemotherapy. Although chemotherapy, androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs), and radium-223 prolong survival, toxicities are substantial and increased in older adults with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). We aimed to assess RSM feasibility among older adults receiving life-prolonging mPC treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Older adults aged 65+ starting chemotherapy, an ARAT, or radium-223 for mPC were enrolled in a multicentre prospective cohort study. As part of the RSM package, participants completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) daily and detailed questionnaires assessing mood, anxiety, fatigue, insomnia, and pain weekly online or by phone throughout one treatment cycle (3-4 weeks). Alerts were sent to the clinical oncology team for severe symptoms (ESAS ≥7). Participants also completed an end of study questionnaire that assessed study burden and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were used to determine recruitment and retention rates, participant response rates to daily and weekly questionnaires, clinician responses to alerts, and participant satisfaction rates. An inductive descriptive approach was used to categorize open-ended responses about study benefits, challenges, and recommendations into relevant themes. RESULTS Ninety males were included (mean age 77 years, 48% ARAT, 38% chemotherapy, and 14% radium-223). Approximately 38% of patients preferred phone-based RSM. Patients provided RSM responses in 1216 out of 1311 daily questionnaires (93%). Over 93% of participants were satisfied (36%), very satisfied (43%), or extremely satisfied (16%) with RSM, although daily reporting was reported by several (8%) as burdensome. Nearly 45% of patients reported severe symptoms during RSM. Most symptom alerts sent to the oncology care team were acknowledged (97%) and 53% led to follow-ups with a nurse or physician for additional care. DISCUSSION RSM is feasible and acceptable to older adults with mPC, but accommodation needs to be made for phone-based RSM. The optimal frequency and duration of RSM also needs to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Feng
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesia, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Daniel Santa Mina
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Salvador Zubirán National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - George Tomlinson
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Postel-Vinay S, Lam VK, Ros W, Bauer TM, Hansen AR, Cho DC, Stephen Hodi F, Schellens JHM, Litton JK, Aspeslagh S, Autio KA, Opdam FL, McKean M, Somaiah N, Champiat S, Altan M, Spreafico A, Rahma O, Paul EM, Ahlers CM, Zhou H, Struemper H, Gorman SA, Watmuff M, Yablonski KM, Yanamandra N, Chisamore MJ, Schmidt EV, Hoos A, Marabelle A, Weber JS, Heymach JV. First-in-human phase I study of the OX40 agonist GSK3174998 with or without pembrolizumab in patients with selected advanced solid tumors (ENGAGE-1). J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-005301. [PMID: 36927527 PMCID: PMC10030671 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The phase I first-in-human study ENGAGE-1 evaluated the humanized IgG1 OX40 agonistic monoclonal antibody GSK3174998 alone (Part 1 (P1)) or in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 2 (P2)) in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS GSK3174998 (0.003-10 mg/kg) ± pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks using a continuous reassessment method for dose escalation. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity. RESULTS 138 patients were enrolled (45 (P1) and 96 (P2, including 3 crossovers)). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 51% (P1) and 64% (P2) of patients, fatigue being the most common (11% and 24%, respectively). No dose-toxicity relationship was observed, and maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicities (P2) included Grade 3 (G3) pleural effusion and G1 myocarditis with G3 increased troponin. GSK3174998 ≥0.3 mg/kg demonstrated pharmacokinetic linearity and >80% receptor occupancy on circulating T cells; 0.3 mg/kg was selected for further evaluation. Limited clinical activity was observed for GSK3174998 (P1: disease control rate (DCR) ≥24 weeks 9%) and was not greater than that expected for pembrolizumab alone (P2: overall response rate 8%, DCR ≥24 weeks 28%). Multiplexed immunofluorescence data from paired biopsies suggested that increased infiltration of natural killer (NK)/natural killer T (NKT) cells and decreased regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment may contribute to clinical responses: CD16+CD56-CD134+ NK /NKT cells and CD3+CD4+FOXP3+CD134+ Tregs exhibited the largest magnitude of change on treatment, whereas CD3+CD8+granzyme B+PD-1+CD134+ cytotoxic T cells were the least variable. Tumor gene expression profiling revealed an upregulation of inflammatory responses, T-cell proliferation, and NK cell function on treatment with some inflammatory cytokines upregulated in peripheral blood. However, target engagement, evidenced by pharmacologic activity in peripheral blood and tumor tissue, did not correlate with clinical efficacy. The low number of responses precluded identifying a robust biomarker signature predictive of response. CONCLUSIONS GSK3174998±pembrolizumab was well tolerated over the dose range tested and demonstrated target engagement. Limited clinical activity does not support further development of GSK3174998±pembrolizumab in advanced cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02528357.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Postel-Vinay
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincent K Lam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Willeke Ros
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Todd M Bauer
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel C Cho
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer K Litton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sandrine Aspeslagh
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Karen A Autio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Frans L Opdam
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Neeta Somaiah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephane Champiat
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mehmet Altan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Osama Rahma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elaine M Paul
- GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Helen Zhou
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Axel Hoos
- GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aurelien Marabelle
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jeffrey S Weber
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Parmar A, Ghosh S, Sahgal A, Lalani AKA, Hansen AR, Reaume MN, Wood L, Basappa NS, Heng DYC, Graham J, Kollmannsberger C, Soulières D, Breau RH, Tanguay S, Kapoor A, Pouliot F, Bjarnason GA. Evaluating the impact of early identification of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6:e1763. [PMID: 36517084 PMCID: PMC10026314 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been reported to be present in up to 25% of patients diagnosed with mRCC. There is limited published literature evaluating the role of routine intra-cranial imaging for the screening of asymptomatic BM in mRCC. AIMS To evaluate the potential utility of routine intra-cranial imaging, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to characterize the outcomes of mRCC patients who presented with asymptomatic BM, as compared to symptomatic BM. METHODS AND RESULTS The Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis) database was used to identify mRCC patients diagnosed with BM. This cohort was divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of BM symptoms. Details regarding patient demographics, disease characteristics, systemic treatments, BM characteristics and survival outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis was through chi-square tests, analysis of variance, and Kaplan-Meier method to characterize survival outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. A total of 267 mRCC patients with BM were identified of which 106 (40%) presented with asymptomatic disease. The majority of patients presented with multiple (i.e., >1) BM (75%) with no significant differences noted in number of BM or BM-directed therapy received in symptomatic, as compared to asymptomatic BM patients. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] overall survival (OS) from mRCC diagnosis was 42 months (95% CI: 32-62) for patients with asymptomatic BM, and 39 months (95% CI: 29-48) with symptomatic BM (p = 0.10). OS from time of BM diagnosis was 28 months (95% CI: 18-42) for the asymptomatic BM group, as compared to 13 months (95% CI: 10-21) in the symptomatic BM group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Given a substantial proportion of patients may present with asymptomatic BM, limiting intra-cranial imaging to patients with symptomatic BM, may be associated with a missed opportunity for timely diagnosis and treatment. The utility of routine intra-cranial imaging in patients with renal cell carcinoma, warrants further prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambica Parmar
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aly-Khan A Lalani
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Neil Reaume
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lori Wood
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Naveen S Basappa
- Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Denis Soulières
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Anil Kapoor
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Cancer Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim VS, Yang H, Timilshina N, Breunis H, Emmenegger U, Gregg R, Hansen AR, Tomlinson G, Alibhai SMH. The role of frailty in modifying physical function and quality of life over time in older men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101417. [PMID: 36682218 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) expand and its patient population ages, consideration of frailty is increasingly relevant. Using a novel frailty index (FI) and two common frailty screening tools, we examined quality of life (QoL) and physical function (PF) in frail versus non-frail men receiving treatment for mCRPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Men aged 65+ starting docetaxel chemotherapy, abiraterone, or enzalutamide for mCRPC were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study. QoL, fatigue, pain, and mood were measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System tiredness and pain subscales, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. PF was evaluated with grip strength, four-meter gait speed, five times Sit-to-Stand Test, and instrumental activities of daily living. Frailty was determined using the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), the Geriatric 8 (G8), and an FI constructed from 36 variables spanning laboratory abnormalities, geriatric syndromes, functional status, social support, as well as emotional, cognitive, and physical deficits. We categorized patients as non-frail (FI ≤ 0.2, VES < 3, G8 > 14), pre-frail (FI > 0.20, ≤0.35), or frail (FI > 0.35, VES ≥ 3, G8 ≤ 14); assessed correlation between the three tools; and performed linear mixed-effects regression analyses to examine longitudinal differences in outcomes (0, 3, 6 months) by frailty status. A sensitivity analysis with worst-case imputation was conducted to explore attrition. RESULTS We enrolled 175 men (mean age 74.9 years) starting docetaxel (n = 71), abiraterone (n = 37), or enzalutamide (n = 67). Our FI demonstrated moderate correlation with the VES-13 (r = 0.607, p < 0.001) and the G8 (r = -0.520, p < 0.001). Baseline FI score was associated with worse QoL (p < 0.001), fatigue (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001), mood (p < 0.001), PF (p < 0.001), and higher attrition (p < 0.01). Over time, most outcomes remained stable, although pain improved, on average, regardless of frailty status (p = 0.007), while fatigue (p = 0.045) and mood (p = 0.015) improved in frail patients alone. DISCUSSION Among older men receiving care for mCRPC, frailty may be associated with worse baseline QoL and PF, but over time, frail patients may experience largely similar trends in QoL and PF as their non-frail counterparts. Further study with larger sample size and longer follow-up may help elucidate how best to incorporate frailty into treatment decision-making for mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie S Kim
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Helen Yang
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Urban Emmenegger
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard Gregg
- Division of Medical Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lim EA, Schweizer MT, Chi KN, Aggarwal R, Agarwal N, Gulley J, Attiyeh E, Greger J, Wu S, Jaiprasart P, Loffredo J, Bandyopadhyay N, Xie H, Hansen AR. Phase 1 Study of Safety and Preliminary Clinical Activity of JNJ-63898081, a PSMA and CD3 Bispecific Antibody, for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:366-375. [PMID: 36948922 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer immunotherapies have limited efficacy in prostate cancer due to the immunosuppressive prostate microenvironment. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression is prevalent in prostate cancer, preserved during malignant transformation, and increases in response to anti-androgen therapies, making it a commonly targeted tumor associated antigen for prostate cancer. JNJ-63898081 (JNJ-081) is a bispecific antibody targeting PSMA-expressing tumor cells and CD3-expressing T cells, aiming to overcome immunosuppression and promoting antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a phase 1 dose escalation study of JNJ-081 in patients with metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC). Eligible patients included those receiving ≥1 prior line treatment with either novel androgen receptor targeted therapy or taxane for mCRPC. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of JNJ-081, and preliminary antitumor response to treatment were evaluated. JNJ-081 was administered initially by intravenous (IV) then by subcutaneous (SC) route. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients in 10 dosing cohorts received JNJ-081 ranging from 0.3 µg/kg to 3.0 µg/kg IV and 3.0 µg/kg to 60 µg/kg SC (with step-up priming used at higher SC doses). All 39 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 4 patients. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed at higher doses with JNJ-081 IV or SC; however, CRS and infusion-related reaction (IRR) were reduced with SC dosing and step-up priming at higher doses. Treatment doses >30 µg/kg SC led to transient PSA decreases. No radiographic responses were observed. Anti-drug antibody responses were observed in 19 patients receiving JNJ-081 IV or SC. CONCLUSION JNJ-081 dosing led to transient declines in PSA in patients with mCRPC. CRS and IRR could be partially mitigated by SC dosing, step-up priming, and a combination of both strategies. T cell redirection for prostate cancer is feasible and PSMA is a potential therapeutic target for T cell redirection in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer- Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - James Gulley
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - James Greger
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA
| | - Shujian Wu
- Janssen Research & Development, Horsham, PA
| | | | | | | | - Hong Xie
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Alexandria Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mahler M, Al-Ezzi E, Shrem NS, Zhang L, Winquist E, Canil C, Ong M, Hansen AR, Emmenegger U. UnCHAARTED territory: The role of docetaxel rechallenge following chemohormonal therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:539.e17-539.e22. [PMID: 36272847 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of docetaxel rechallenge (DR) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following chemohormonal therapy for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Additionally, we sought to define clinical factors predicting treatment response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of men treated with docetaxel for mCSPC and then rechallenged in the mCRPC setting from four cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) following DR were evaluated. RESULTS Fifty five patients were identified between 2015 and 2020. Prior to DR, 94.5% of patients received androgen-receptor axis targeted therapy, 20% received radium-223, and 1.8% received cabazitaxel. Among 54 evaluable patients, 27.8% had a PSA decline ≥50%. Median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.8) and median OS from androgen deprivation therapy initiation was 38.3 months (95% CI, 32.9-41.0). A Gleason Score of ≥8 was an independent predictor of prolonged PFS (HR 0.32, 95% CI, 0.12-0.81; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS DR following chemohormonal therapy for mCSPC produced a meaningful PSA response in approximately one-quarter of patients, with relatively short PFS. The impact of Gleason Score on docetaxel response warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Mahler
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Esmail Al-Ezzi
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Noa Shani Shrem
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Winquist
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christina Canil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Ong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Watson GA, Veitch ZW, Shepshelovich D, Liu ZA, Spreafico A, Abdul Razak AR, Bedard PL, Siu LL, Minasian L, Hansen AR. Evaluation of the patient experience of symptomatic adverse events on Phase I clinical trials using PRO-CTCAE. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1629-1635. [PMID: 36008705 PMCID: PMC9596492 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01926-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse event (AE) reporting in early-phase clinical trials is essential in determining the tolerability of experimental anticancer therapies. The patient-reported outcome version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) evaluates AE components such as severity and interference in daily life. The aim of this study was to correlate the grade of clinician-reported AEs with patients' reported experience of these toxicities using PRO-CTCAE. METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumours enrolled on Phase I clinical trials were surveyed using the PRO-CTCAE. Symptomatic AEs were recorded by physicians using the CTCAE. A logistic regression model was used to assess associations between CTCAE grade and PRO responses. RESULTS Of 219 evaluable patients, 81 experienced a high-grade (3/4) clinician-reported symptom, and of these, only 32 (40%) and 26 (32%) patients concordantly reported these as either severe or very severe, and interfering with daily life either 'quite a bit' or 'very much', respectively. Of the 137 patients who experienced a low-grade (1/2) clinician-reported AE as their worst symptom, 98 (72%) and 118 (86%) patients concordantly reported these as either mild-moderate severity and minimally interfering with daily life, respectively. There was a statistically significant association between clinician-reported AE grade and interference. Interference scores were also associated with dose reductions. CONCLUSION This is the first study to explore patient-reported severity and interference from symptomatic toxicities and compare clinician grading of the same toxicities. The study provided further evidence to support the added value of the PRO-CTCAE in Phase I oncology trials, which would make AE reporting patient-centred. Further work is needed to determine how this would affect the assessment of tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey A Watson
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zachary W Veitch
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Shepshelovich
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Medicine D, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Albiruni R Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lori Minasian
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Steeghs N, Hansen AR, Hanna GJ, Garralda E, Park H, Strauss J, Adam M, Campbell G, Carver J, Easton R, Mays K, Skrdla P, Struemper H, Washburn ML, Matheny C, Piha‐Paul S. Manufacturing-dependent change in biological activity of the TLR4 agonist GSK1795091 and implications for lipid A analog development. Clin Transl Sci 2022; 15:2625-2639. [PMID: 36097345 PMCID: PMC9652439 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
A phase I trial (NCT03447314; 204686) evaluated the safety and efficacy of GSK1795091, a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist, in combination with immunotherapy (GSK3174998 [anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody], GSK3359609 [anti-ICOS monoclonal antibody], or pembrolizumab) in patients with solid tumors. The primary endpoint was safety; other endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PD). Manufacturing of GSK1795091 formulation was modified during the trial to streamline production and administration, resulting in reduced PD (cytokine) activity. Fifty-four patients received GSK1795091 with a combination partner; 32 received only the modified GSK1795091 formulation, 15 received only the original formulation, and seven switched mid-study from the original to the modified formulation. Despite the modified formulation demonstrating higher systemic GSK1795091 exposure compared with the original formulation, the transient, dose-dependent elevations in cytokine and chemokine concentrations were no longer observed (e.g., IP-10, IL10, IL1-RA). Most patients (51/54; 94%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the study. Safety profiles were similar between formulations, but a higher incidence of TEAEs associated with immune responses (chills, fatigue, pyrexia, nausea, and vomiting) were observed with the original formulation. No conclusions can be made regarding GSK1795091 anti-tumor activity due to the limited data collected. Manufacturing changes were hypothesized to have caused the change in biological activity in this study. Structural characterization revealed GSK1795091 aggregate size in the modified formulation to be twice that in the original formulation, suggesting a negative correlation between GSK1795091 aggregate size and PD activity. This may have important clinical implications for future development of structurally similar compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Glenn J. Hanna
- Northwest Medical SpecialistsTacomaWashington StateUSA,Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Elena Garralda
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) Hospital Universitari Vall d'HebronBarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
O'Malley DM, Bariani GM, Cassier PA, Marabelle A, Hansen AR, De Jesus Acosta A, Miller WH, Safra T, Italiano A, Mileshkin L, Amonkar M, Yao L, Jin F, Norwood K, Maio M. Health-related quality of life with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced microsatellite instability high/mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer in the KEYNOTE-158 study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:245-253. [PMID: 35835611 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pembrolizumab demonstrated a clinically meaningful objective response rate in patients with previously treated, advanced MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer in the multicohort phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02628067). We present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results for these patients. METHODS This analysis included patients from cohorts D (endometrial cancer with any MSI status) and K (any MSI-H/dMMR solid tumor except colorectal) who had previously treated, advanced MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 35 cycles. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires were administered at baseline, at regular intervals during treatment, and 30 days after treatment discontinuation. Pre-specified exploratory analyses included changes from baseline to week 9 in QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL and EQ-5D-3L visual analog scale (VAS) score for all patients and by best overall response. RESULTS 84 of 90 enrolled patients completed ≥1 HRQoL questionnaire and were included in the analysis. QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L compliance rates were 90% and 94%, respectively, at baseline, and 92% and 93% at week 9. Mean (95% CI) QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores improved from baseline to week 9 by 6.08 (0.71-11.46) points in the overall population, with greater improvement in patients who achieved complete or partial response (11.67 [5.33-18.00]-point increase). Mean (95% CI) EQ-5D-3L VAS scores improved by 6.00 (2.25-9.75) points in the overall population and 9.11 (5.24-12.98) points in patients with CR/PR. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab maintained or improved HRQoL in patients with previously treated, advanced MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer, further supporting efficacy and safety results from KEYNOTE-158 and pembrolizumab use in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M O'Malley
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. David.O'
| | - G M Bariani
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - A Marabelle
- Gustave Roussy, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1015 & CIC1428, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - A R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - A De Jesus Acosta
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - W H Miller
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - T Safra
- Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - A Italiano
- Early Phase Trials Unit, Institut Bergonié and Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - L Mileshkin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | | | - L Yao
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
| | - F Jin
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
| | | | - M Maio
- University of Siena and Center for Immuno-Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Voss MH, Azad AA, Hansen AR, Gray JE, Welsh SJ, Song X, Kuziora M, Meinecke L, Blando J, Achour I, Wang Y, Walcott FL, Oosting SF. A Randomized Phase II Study of MEDI0680 in Combination with Durvalumab versus Nivolumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3032-3041. [PMID: 35507017 PMCID: PMC9365340 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE MEDI0680 is a humanized anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody, and durvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 antibody. Combining treatment using these antibodies may improve efficacy versus blockade of PD-1 alone. This phase II study evaluated antitumor activity and safety of MEDI0680 plus durvalumab versus nivolumab monotherapy in immunotherapy-naïve patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who received at least one prior line of antiangiogenic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received either MEDI0680 (20 mg/kg) with durvalumab (750 mg) or nivolumab (240 mg), all intravenous, every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included best overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, overall survival (OS), and immunogenicity. Exploratory endpoints included changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), baseline tumor mutational burden, and tumor-infiltrated immune cell profiles. RESULTS Sixty-three patients were randomized (combination, n = 42; nivolumab, n = 21). ORR was 16.7% [7/42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0-31.4] with combination treatment and 23.8% (5/21; 95% CI, 8.2-47.2) with nivolumab. Median PFS was 3.6 months in both arms; median OS was not reached in either arm. Because of adverse events, 23.8% of patients discontinued MEDI0680 and durvalumab and 14.3% of patients discontinued nivolumab. In the combination arm, reduction in ctDNA fraction was associated with longer PFS. ctDNA mutational analysis did not demonstrate an association with response in either arm. Tumor-infiltrated immune profiles showed an association between immune cell activation and response in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS MEDI0680 combined with durvalumab was safe and tolerable; however, it did not improve efficacy versus nivolumab monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin H Voss
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Sarah J Welsh
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Xuyang Song
- Clinical Pharmacology & Quantitative Pharmacology, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Michael Kuziora
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Lina Meinecke
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Jorge Blando
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Ikbel Achour
- Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Yi Wang
- Early Oncology Biometrics, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | | | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boukhaled GM, Gadalla R, Elsaesser HJ, Abd-Rabbo D, Quevedo R, Yang SYC, Guo M, Wang BX, Noamani B, Gray D, Lau SCM, Taylor K, Aung K, Spreafico A, Hansen AR, Saibil SD, Hirano N, Guidos C, Pugh TJ, McGaha TL, Ohashi PS, Sacher AG, Butler MO, Brooks DG. Pre-encoded responsiveness to type I interferon in the peripheral immune system defines outcome of PD1 blockade therapy. Nat Immunol 2022; 23:1273-1283. [PMID: 35835962 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-022-01262-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Type I interferons (IFN-Is) are central regulators of anti-tumor immunity and responses to immunotherapy, but they also drive the feedback inhibition underlying therapeutic resistance. In the present study, we developed a mass cytometry approach to quantify IFN-I-stimulated protein expression across immune cells and used multi-omics to uncover pre-therapy cellular states encoding responsiveness to inflammation. Analyzing peripheral blood cells from multiple cancer types revealed that differential responsiveness to IFN-Is before anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) treatment was highly predictive of long-term survival after therapy. Unexpectedly, IFN-I hyporesponsiveness efficiently predicted long-term survival, whereas high responsiveness to IFN-I was strongly associated with treatment failure and diminished survival time. Peripheral IFN-I responsive states were not associated with tumor inflammation, identifying a disconnect between systemic immune potential and 'cold' or 'hot' tumor states. Mechanistically, IFN-I responsiveness was epigenetically imprinted before therapy, poising cells for differential inflammatory responses and dysfunctional T cell effector programs. Thus, we identify physiological cell states with clinical importance that can predict success and long-term survival of PD1-blocking immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle M Boukhaled
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Ramy Gadalla
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heidi J Elsaesser
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diala Abd-Rabbo
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rene Quevedo
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Y Cindy Yang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mengdi Guo
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ben X Wang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Babak Noamani
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana Gray
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sally C M Lau
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kirsty Taylor
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kyaw Aung
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samuel D Saibil
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naoto Hirano
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia Guidos
- Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor J Pugh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy L McGaha
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pamela S Ohashi
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adrian G Sacher
- Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus O Butler
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David G Brooks
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. .,Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
R Peter M, Bilenky M, Shi Y, Pu J, Kamdar S, R Hansen A, E Fleshner N, S Sridhar S, M Joshua A, Hirst M, Xu W, Bapat B. A novel methylated cell-free DNA marker panel to monitor treatment response in metastatic prostate cancer. Epigenomics 2022; 14:811-822. [PMID: 35818933 DOI: 10.2217/epi-2022-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study examined circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) biomarkers associated with androgen treatment resistance in metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC). Materials & methods: We designed a panel of nine candidate cfDNA methylation markers using droplet digital PCR (Methyl-ddPCR) and assessed methylation levels in sequentially collected cfDNA samples from patients with mCRPC. Results: Increased cfDNA methylation in eight out of nine markers during androgen-targeted treatment correlated with a faster time to clinical progression. Cox proportional hazards modeling and logistic regression analysis further confirmed that higher cfDNA methylation during treatment was significantly associated with clinical progression. Conclusion: Overall, our findings have revealed a novel methylated cfDNA marker panel that could aid in the clinical management of metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madonna R Peter
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Misha Bilenky
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Science Center, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada
| | - Yuliang Shi
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Jiajie Pu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Shivani Kamdar
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada.,Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Martin Hirst
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Science Center, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada.,Department of Microbiology & Immunology & Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Bharati Bapat
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nguyen EK, Lalani AKA, Ghosh S, Basappa NS, Kapoor A, Hansen AR, Kollmannsberger C, Heng D, Wood LA, Castonguay V, Soulières D, Winquist E, Canil C, Graham J, Bjarnason GA, Breau RH, Pouliot F, Swaminath A. Outcomes of Radiation Therapy Plus Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100899. [PMID: 35814860 PMCID: PMC9260099 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose With the integration of immunotherapy (IO) agents in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), there has been interest in the combined use with radiation therapy (RT). However, real world data are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with mRCC receiving both RT and IO compared with IO alone. Methods and Materials Data were collected from Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System from January 2011 to September 2019 across 14 academic centers. Patients with mRCC who received IO as first- or second-line therapy were included. RT was categorized as radical dose or palliative dose. Kaplan-Meier estimates were reported for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure. Cox proportional hazard models were used adjusted for age and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk categories. Results In total, 505 patients were included in the study: 179 received RT + IO and 326 received IO alone. Two-year OS for the RT + IO group was 55.0% compared with 66.4% in the IO alone cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.38; P = .07). At 2 years, 12.2% of the RT + IO patients remained on therapy versus 30.9% in the IO alone group (aHR, 1.30; P = .02). For patients receiving first-line therapy, 2-year OS in the RT + IO group was 56.4% versus 78.4% in the IO alone arm, though this difference was not statistically significant (aHR, 1.23; P = .56). For patients receiving radical dose and palliative dose, 2-year OS was 57.0% and 53.9%, respectively (aHR, 0.86; P = .63). Conclusions In this descriptive analysis, more than one-third of patients with mRCC received RT and demonstrated inferior outcomes compared with IO alone. Potential explanations include greater presence of adverse metastatic sites in those receiving RT. Prospective clinical trials evaluating potential benefits of RT in an IO era remain an important need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sunita Ghosh
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Anil Kapoor
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Daniel Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lori A. Wood
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Denis Soulières
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Christina Canil
- The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Georg A. Bjarnason
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rodney H. Breau
- The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Even C, Delord JP, Price KA, Nakagawa K, Oh DY, Burge M, Chung HC, Doi T, Fakih M, Takahashi S, Yao L, Jin F, Norwood K, Hansen AR. Evaluation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced salivary gland carcinoma in the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 171:259-268. [PMID: 35777186 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM We evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced salivary gland carcinoma on the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067). METHODS Eligible patients had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced salivary gland carcinoma with prior failure or intolerance to standard therapy, measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1., and ECOG performance status 0-1. Patients were enrolled irrespective of tumour PD-L1 expression. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles (∼2 years). Radiographic imaging occurred every 9 weeks through month 12, then every 12 weeks. PD-L1 positivity was defined as combined positive score ≥1 (evaluated using PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx). The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS In total, 109 patients were enrolled (PD-L1-positive, 25.7%). At the data cutoff (October 5, 2020), median follow-up was 53.3 (range, 50.8-56.3) months. Objective response rate was 4.6% (95% CI, 1.5-10.4%) among all patients (complete response, n = 1; partial response, n = 4) and was 10.7% (95% CI, 2.3-28.2%) in patients with PD-L1-positive disease and 2.6% (95% CI, 0.3-9.1%) in patients with PD-L1-negative disease. Duration of response was ≥24 months for all 5 responders; median duration of response was not reached (range, 25.1-49.8+ months). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.0 (95% CI, 2.6-4.2) and 21.1 (95% CI, 15.9-25.5) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 75.2% (grade 3-4, 15.6%; grade 5, 0%) of patients. Immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 22.0% of patients (grade 3, 5.5%; grade 4-5, 0). CONCLUSIONS A small subset of patients with advanced salivary gland carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab had a response; all had response duration ≥2 years. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was manageable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Do-Youn Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Matthew Burge
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital and University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Hyun C Chung
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Toshihiko Doi
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Marwan Fakih
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lili Yao
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Fan Jin
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hilton J, Gelmon K, Bedard PL, Tu D, Xu H, Tinker AV, Goodwin R, Laurie SA, Jonker D, Hansen AR, Veitch ZW, Renouf DJ, Hagerman L, Lui H, Chen B, Kellar D, Li I, Lee SE, Kono T, Cheng BYC, Yap D, Lai D, Beatty S, Soong J, Pritchard KI, Soria-Bretones I, Chen E, Feilotter H, Rushton M, Seymour L, Aparicio S, Cescon DW. Results of the phase I CCTG IND.231 trial of CX-5461 in patients with advanced solid tumors enriched for DNA-repair deficiencies. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3607. [PMID: 35750695 PMCID: PMC9232501 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31199-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
CX-5461 is a G-quadruplex stabilizer that exhibits synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient models. In this multicentre phase I trial in patients with solid tumors, 40 patients are treated across 10 dose levels (50–650 mg/m2) to determine the recommended phase II dose (primary outcome), and evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (secondary outcomes). Defective homologous recombination is explored as a predictive biomarker of response. CX-5461 is generally well tolerated, with a recommended phase II dose of 475 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, and dose limiting phototoxicity. Responses are observed in 14% of patients, primarily in patients with defective homologous recombination. Reversion mutations in PALB2 and BRCA2 are detected on progression following initial response in germline carriers, confirming the underlying synthetic lethal mechanism. In vitro characterization of UV sensitization shows this toxicity is related to the CX-5461 chemotype, independent of G-quadruplex synthetic lethality. These results establish clinical proof-of-concept for this G-quadruplex stabilizer. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02719977. G-quadruplex stabilizers, including CX-5461, exhibit synthetic lethality with loss of BRCA1/2 in preclinical models. Here the authors report the results of a phase I study of CX-5461 in patients with solid tumors enriched for DNA-repair deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Hilton
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Karen Gelmon
- BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Hong Xu
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Anna V Tinker
- BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | | | | | - Derek Jonker
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zachary W Veitch
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel J Renouf
- BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Linda Hagerman
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Hongbo Lui
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Bingshu Chen
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Deb Kellar
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Irene Li
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sung-Eun Lee
- BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Takako Kono
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Brian Y C Cheng
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Damian Yap
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Daniel Lai
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Sean Beatty
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Eric Chen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Harriet Feilotter
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Moira Rushton
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Lesley Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, 10 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| | - Samuel Aparicio
- Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.,Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David W Cescon
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Choudhury AD, Higano CS, de Bono JS, Cook N, Rathkopf DE, Wisinski KB, Martin-Liberal J, Linch M, Heath EI, Baird RD, García-Carbacho J, Quintela-Fandino M, Barry ST, de Bruin EC, Colebrook S, Hawkins G, Klinowska T, Maroj B, Moorthy G, Mortimer PG, Moschetta M, Nikolaou M, Sainsbury L, Shapiro GI, Siu LL, Hansen AR. A Phase I Study Investigating AZD8186, a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of PI3Kβ/δ, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:2257-2269. [PMID: 35247924 PMCID: PMC9662946 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize safety and tolerability of the selective PI3Kβ inhibitor AZD8186, identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and assess preliminary efficacy in combination with abiraterone acetate or vistusertib. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase I open-label study included patients with advanced solid tumors, particularly prostate cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and squamous non-small cell lung cancer. The study comprised four arms: (i) AZD8186 monotherapy dose finding; (ii) monotherapy dose expansion; (iii) AZD8186/abiraterone acetate (with prednisone); and (iv) AZD8186/vistusertib. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and identification of the RP2D of AZD8186 monotherapy and in combination. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and tumor and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses. RESULTS In total, 161 patients were enrolled. AZD8186 was well tolerated across all study arms, the most common adverse events being gastrointestinal symptoms. In the monotherapy dose-finding arm, four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (mainly rash). AZD8186 doses of 60-mg twice daily [BID; 5 days on, 2 days off (5:2)] and 120-mg BID (continuous and 5:2 dosing) were taken into subsequent arms. The PKs of AZD8186 were dose proportional, without interactions with abiraterone acetate or vistusertib, and target inhibition was observed in plasma and tumor tissue. Monotherapy and combination therapy showed preliminary evidence of limited antitumor activity by imaging and, in prostate cancer, PSA reduction. CONCLUSIONS AZD8186 monotherapy had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, and combination with abiraterone acetate/prednisone or vistusertib was also tolerated. There was preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, meriting further exploration of AZD8186 in subsequent studies in PI3Kβ pathway-dependent cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atish D. Choudhury
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Celestia S. Higano
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Johann S. de Bono
- Drug Development Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Cook
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dana E. Rathkopf
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kari B. Wisinski
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Juan Martin-Liberal
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Linch
- University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute and UCL Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elisabeth I. Heath
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Javier García-Carbacho
- Department of Medical Oncology (Hospital Clinic Barcelona)/Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brijesh Maroj
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ganesh Moorthy
- Clinical Pharmacology & Quantitative Pharmacology (CPQP), Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Liz Sainsbury
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey I. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lillian L. Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Corresponding Author: Aaron R. Hansen, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 700 University Avenue, Suite 7-623, Toronto, ON M5G 1×6, Canada. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Watson GA, Sanz-Garcia E, Zhang WJ, Liu ZA, Yang SC, Wang B, Liu S, Kubli S, Berman H, Pfister T, Genta S, Spreafico A, Hansen AR, Bedard PL, Lheureux S, Abdul Razak A, Cescon D, Butler MO, Xu W, Mak TW, Siu LL, Chen E. Increase in serum choline levels predicts for improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced cancers receiving pembrolizumab. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004378. [PMID: 35705312 PMCID: PMC9204435 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies have demonstrated that T cells can induce vasodilation in a choline-acetyltransferase dependent manner, leading to an increase in T cell migration to infected tissues in response to viral infection, but its role in cancer is unclear. Choline acetyltransferase catalyzes the production of acetylcholine from choline and acetyl-CoA, however, acetylcholine is challenging to quantify due to its extremely short half-life while choline is stable. This study aims to correlate serum choline levels in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving pembrolizumab with treatment outcomes. Methods Blood samples were collected at baseline and at week 7 (pre-cycle 3) in patients treated with pembrolizumab in the INvestigator-initiated Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab Immunological Response Evaluation phase II trial (NCT02644369). Samples were analyzed for choline and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Multivariable Cox models were used to assess the association between choline and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) when including ΔctDNAC3 (the change in ctDNA from baseline to cycle 3), cohort, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB). An independent validation cohort from the LIBERATE study (NCT03702309) included patients on early phase trials treated with a PD-1 inhibitor. Results A total of 106 pts were included in the analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.6 months, median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 13.7 months, respectively. An increase in serum choline level at week 7 compared with baseline (ΔcholineC3) in 81 pts was significantly associated with a better PFS (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.83, p=0.009), and a trend toward a better OS (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.12, p=0.119). A combination of ΔctDNAC3 and ΔcholineC3 was prognostic for both OS and PFS. Multivariable analyses show ΔcholineC3 was a prognostic factor for PFS independent of ΔctDNAC3, cohort, PD-L1 and TMB. In the independent validation cohort (n=51), an increase in serum choline at cycle 2 was associated with a trend to improved PFS. Conclusions This is the first exploratory report of serum choline levels in pan-cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab. The association between improved PFS and ΔcholineC3 suggests a possible role for the cholinergic system in the regulation of antitumor immunity. Further pre-clinical and clinical studies are required to validate this finding. Trial registration number NCT03702309.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Alan Watson
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Enrique Sanz-Garcia
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wen-Jiang Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zhihui Amy Liu
- Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sy Cindy Yang
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ben Wang
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaofeng Liu
- Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shawn Kubli
- Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hal Berman
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Pfister
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sofia Genta
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Albiruni Abdul Razak
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dave Cescon
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus O Butler
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tak W Mak
- Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
O'Malley DM, Bariani GM, Cassier PA, Marabelle A, Hansen AR, De Jesus Acosta A, Miller WH, Safra T, Italiano A, Mileshkin L, Xu L, Jin F, Norwood K, Maio M. Pembrolizumab in Patients With Microsatellite Instability-High Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-158 Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:752-761. [PMID: 34990208 PMCID: PMC8887941 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pembrolizumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with previously treated, advanced microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors, including endometrial cancer, in the nonrandomized, open-label, multicohort, phase II KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067). We report efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer enrolled in KEYNOTE-158. METHODS Eligible patients from cohorts D (endometrial cancer, regardless of MSI-H/dMMR status) and K (any MSI-H/dMMR solid tumor, except colorectal) with previously treated, advanced MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer received pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 35 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by independent central radiologic review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS As of October 5, 2020, 18 of 90 treated patients (20%) had completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab and 52 (58%) had discontinued treatment. In the efficacy population (patients who received ≥ 1 dose of pembrolizumab and had ≥ 26 weeks of follow-up; N = 79), the median time from first dose to data cutoff was 42.6 (range, 6.4-56.1) months. The objective response rate was 48% (95% CI, 37 to 60), and median duration of response was not reached (2.9-49.7+ months). Median progression-free survival was 13.1 (95% CI, 4.3 to 34.4) months, and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 27.2 months to not reached). Among all treated patients, 76% had ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse event (grades 3-4, 12%). There were no fatal treatment-related events. Immune-mediated adverse events or infusion reactions occurred in 28% of patients (grades 3-4, 7%; no fatal events). CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab demonstrated robust and durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with manageable toxicity in patients with previously treated, advanced MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. O'Malley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH,David M. O'Malley, MD, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, 320 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail:
| | - Giovanni Mendonca Bariani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Aurelien Marabelle
- Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces (DITEP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM U1015), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Wilson H. Miller
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, Montreal, QC, Canada,Departments of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tamar Safra
- Oncology Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Antoine Italiano
- Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France,Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, France
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lei Xu
- Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ
| | - Fan Jin
- Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ
| | | | - Michele Maio
- Division of Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hilton J, Renouf DJ, Cescon DW, Hansen AR, Razak ARA, Stayner LA, Denny T, Fletcher G, Mak TW, Bray M, Bedard PL. Abstract P1-18-17: Phase I study of cfi-402257, an oral ttk inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors with breast cancer expansion cohorts. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p1-18-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: TTK (also known as Mps1), a dual-specificity serine-threonine kinase, is critical for the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), chromosome alignment and error correction in mitosis. Inhibition of TTK causes premature mitotic exit with unattached chromosomes, resulting in chromosomal missegregation, aneuploidy and cell death. CFI-402257 is a potent (Ki = 0.09 nM, IC50 = 1.2 nM), highly selective and orally active inhibitor of TTK. Robust suppression of tumor growth was achieved upon oral dosing of single agent CFI-402257 in ER+/HER2- and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line and patient derived xenograft models. CFI-402257 demonstrated enhanced cytotoxicity in CDK4/6 inhibitor resistant ER+ breast cancer cell line models compared to parental cell lines, including those with RB1 loss. Methods: This multi-center Phase I dose escalation study (3+3 design) was designed to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CFI-402257 and evaluate anti-tumor activity at the RP2D. CFI-402257 was dosed once daily on a continuous schedule in 28-day cycles at a starting dose of 5mg based on preclinical toxicology. Dose escalation included patients with advanced solid tumors and dose expansion at the RP2D into three expansion cohorts - Cohort A advanced solid tumors, Cohort B advanced ER+ or TNBC with 1-4 prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and Cohort C ER+/HER2- breast cancer in combination with Fulvestrant (500mg IM Day 1, 15 and 29 and then every 28 days) who have had prior treatment with an aromatase inhibitor in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (>= 3 months) and =<1 prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Results: As of May 25, 2021, 66 patients had been enrolled, majority (76%) of patients received >3 prior therapies before study entry and 37% of patients’ (23/66) primary malignancy was breast cancer. The maximum administered dose was 294 mg and the study has continued enrolling at the recommended phase 2 dose of 168 mg with grade 3 Neutropenia, grade 3 Febrile Neutropenia and grade 3 Colitis as the dose limiting toxicities. Only 1/6 patients experienced a DLT at 168 mg (grade 3 Neutropenia, >7 days) The most common treatment emergent AEs (Gd3, >5%) were Neutropenia (15.6%), Anaemia (7.8%), Hypophosphataemia and Febrile Neutropenia (6.3%). PR’s confirmed by the Investigator have been seen to date in 33% of the cohort C subjects (2/6 patients), with an additional two cPR’s seen in the breast cancer population (ER+/HER2-) from the expansion cohorts. Conclusion: CFI-402257 is generally well tolerated and continues to enroll at 168mg daily with a manageable AE profile and early signs of anti-tumor activity. Enrollment in the expansion cohorts is ongoing and updated safety and efficacy data for the previously treated ER+/HER2- population will be presented at the time of the meeting. A multi-center phase II clinical trial is planned.
Citation Format: John Hilton, Daniel J Renouf, David W Cescon, Aaron R Hansen, Albiruni RA Razak, Lee-Anne Stayner, Trisha Denny, Graham Fletcher, Tak W Mak, Mark Bray, Philippe L Bedard. Phase I study of cfi-402257, an oral ttk inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors with breast cancer expansion cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Hilton
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tak W Mak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Bray
- Treadwell Therapeutics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Voon PJ, Chen EX, Chen HX, Lockhart AC, Sahebjam S, Kelly K, Vaishampayan UN, Subbiah V, Razak AR, Renouf DJ, Hotte SJ, Singh A, Bedard PL, Hansen AR, Ivy SP, Wang L, Stayner LA, Siu LL, Spreafico A. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of single agent trametinib in patients with advanced cancer and hepatic dysfunction. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2022; 41:51. [PMID: 35130943 PMCID: PMC8819907 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-021-02236-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trametinib is an oral MEK 1/2 inhibitor, with a single agent recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 2 mg daily (QD). This study was designed to evaluate RP2D, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of trametinib in patients with advanced solid tumors who had various degrees of hepatic dysfunction (HD). METHODS Advanced cancer patients were stratified into 4 HD groups based on Organ Dysfunction Working Group hepatic function stratification criteria: normal (Norm), mild (Mild), moderate (Mod), severe (Sev). Dose escalation was based on "3 + 3" design within each HD group. PK samples were collected at cycle 1 days 15-16. RESULTS Forty-six patients were enrolled with 44 evaluable for safety [Norm=17, Mild=7, Mod (1.5 mg)=4, Mod (2 mg)=5, Sev (1 mg)=9, Sev (1.5 mg)=2] and 22 for PK analysis. Treatment related adverse events were consistent with prior trametinib studies. No treatment related deaths occurred. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluable in 15 patients (Mild=6, Mod (1.5 mg)=3, Mod (2 mg)=2, Sev (1 mg)=3 and Sev (1.5 mg)=1). One DLT (grade 3 acneiform rash) was observed in a Sev patient (1.5 mg). Dose interruptions or reductions due to treatment related adverse events occurred in 15 patients (34%) [Norm=9, 53%; Mild=2, 29%; Mod (1.5 mg)=1, 33%; Mod (2 mg)=2, 33%; Sev (1 mg)=1, 11%; Sev (1.5 mg)=1; 50%]. There were no significant differences across HD groups for all PK parameters when trametinib was normalized to 2 mg. However, only limited PK data were available for the Mod (n = 3) and Sev (n = 3) groups compared to Norm (n = 10) and Mild (n = 6) groups. Trametinib is heavily protein bound, with no correlation between serum albumin level and unbound trametinib fraction (p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS RP2D for trametinib in Mild HD patients is 2 mg QD. There are insufficient number of evaluable patients due to difficulty of patient accrual to declare RP2D and MTD for Mod and Sev HD groups. DLTs were not observed in the highest dose cohorts that reached three evaluable patients - 1.5 mg QD in Mod group, and 1 mg QD in Sev group. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov website ( NCT02070549 ) on February 25, 2014. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Jye Voon
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric X Chen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Helen X Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Organ Dysfunction Working Group, MD, Bethesda, USA
| | | | | | - Karen Kelly
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Albiruni R Razak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Arti Singh
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Organ Dysfunction Working Group, MD, Bethesda, USA
| | - Lisa Wang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lee-Anne Stayner
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 700 University Avenue, office 7-624, ON, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kappel C, Jiang DM, Wong B, Zhang T, Selvarajah S, Warner E, Hansen AR, Fallah-Rad N, Sacher AG, Stockley TL, Bedard PL, Sridhar SS. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Treatment Resistant Metastatic Castrate Sensitive Prostate Cancer Reveals High Frequency of Potential Therapeutic Targets. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:278-284. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
43
|
Chin O, Alshafai L, O'Sullivan B, Su J, Hope A, Bartlett E, Hansen AR, Waldron J, Chepeha D, Xu W, Huang SH, Yu E. Inter-rater concordance and operating definitions of radiologic nodal feature assessment in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2022; 125:105716. [PMID: 35038657 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the reliability of radiologic nodal feature assessment in clinical node-positive human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Baseline CTs or MRIs of clinical node-positive human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed independently by two neuroradiologists for seven nodal features: radiologic nodal involvement, cystic change, presence of necrosis, clustering, conglomeration, coalescence, and extranodal extension. Consensus operating definitions were derived after discussion. The features were re-reviewed in a randomly selected cohort. Levels of certainty (probability of presence: <25%, ∼50%, ∼75%, and >90%) were recorded. Interrater concordance was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS A total of 413 patients (826 necks) were eligible. At initial review, the inter-rater kappa values for: radiologic nodal involvement, cystic change, necrosis, clustering, conglomeration, coalescence, and extranodal extension were 0.92, 0.64, 0.48, 0.32, 0.32, 0.62, and 0.56, respectively. A re-review of 94 randomly selected cases (188 necks) after consolidation of operating definitions for nodal features showed that the inter-rater kappa values of these features were 0.83, 0.62, 0.58, 0.32, 0.18, 0.68, and 0.74 when considering ≥50% certainty as positive, and improved to 0.94, 0.66, 0.59, 0.33, 0.19, 0.76, and 0.86 when considering ≥75% certainty as positive. CONCLUSION Clearly defined nomenclature results in improved interrater reliability when assessing radiologic nodal features, especially for coalescent adenopathy and extranodal extension. Higher levels of certainty are associated with higher inter-rater agreement. Radiology reporting should include clear definitions of clinically relevant nodal features as well as levels of certainty to serve various needs in clinical care and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Chin
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laila Alshafai
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Neuroradiology and Head and Neck Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jie Su
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Bartlett
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Neuroradiology and Head and Neck Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Douglas Chepeha
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Eugene Yu
- Department of Neuroradiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Neuroradiology and Head and Neck Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Malone ER, Lewin J, Li X, Zhang WJ, Lau S, Jarvi K, Hamilton RJ, Hansen AR, Chen EX, Bedard PL. Semen and serum platinum levels in cisplatin-treated survivors of germ cell cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 11:728-734. [PMID: 34918879 PMCID: PMC8817086 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Testicular cancer survivors often have impaired gonadal function possibly related to chemotherapy. Platinum is a heavy metal that can be detected at low levels in serum many years after treatment, it is not known whether platinum also persists in semen and if platinum persistence in semen is associated with impaired fertility. Methods Adult cisplatin‐treated testicular cancer survivors were enrolled. High‐Performance Liquid Chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure semen and serum platinum levels. Semen quality and DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) were assessed. Results From 11/2017 to 12/2019, 38 patients (median age 32 years; range: 19–52) were enrolled. Median cumulative cisplatin dose was 301 mg/m2 (range: 274–404). Platinum levels were higher in semen than in blood (p = 0.03). Semen platinum levels were not significantly associated with time from last cisplatin dosing (r = −0.34; p = 0.09) nor cumulative dose (r = −0.10, p = 0.63). Sperm concentration was correlated with time from last cisplatin dosing (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) but not with semen platinum level (r = −0.15, p = 0.46). DFI was not significantly associated with time from last cisplatin dosing (r = 0.55, p = 0.08) or semen platinum level (r = −0.32, p = 0.33). In four patients with serial semen samples, platinum level decreased and sperm concentration and motility increased over time. Conclusions Platinum is detected in semen of testicular cancer survivors at higher levels than matched blood samples. These preliminary findings may have important implications for the reproductive health of survivors of advanced testicular cancer, further study is needed to assess the relationship between platinum persistence in semen and recovery of fertility postchemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoghan R Malone
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xuan Li
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wen-Jiang Zhang
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Lau
- Murray Koffler Urologic Wellness Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Joseph and Wolff Lebovic Health Complex, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Keith Jarvi
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Murray Koffler Urologic Wellness Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Joseph and Wolff Lebovic Health Complex, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric X Chen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thana M, Basappa NS, Ghosh S, Kollmannsberger CK, Heng DY, Hansen AR, Graham J, Soulières D, Reaume MN, Lalani AKA, Castonguay V, Bjarnason GA, Patenaude F, Breau RH, Pouliot F, Kapoor A, Wood LA. Utilization and safety of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in a real-world cohort of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:210-218. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
46
|
Voon PJ, Chen EX, Chen HX, Lockhart AC, Sahebjam S, Kelly K, Vaishampayan UN, Subbiah V, Razak AR, Renouf DJ, Hotte SJ, Singh A, Bedard PL, Hansen AR, Percy IS, Wang L, Stayner LA, Siu LL, Spreafico A. Abstract P035: A phase 1 pharmacokinetic trial of single agent trametinib a MEK inhibitor in advanced cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction: An NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group (ODWG) study (NCI 9591). Mol Cancer Ther 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-21-p035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Trametinib (Mekinist ®) is an oral bioavailable MEK 1/2 inhibitor that is FDA approved in combination with BRAF inhibitor Dabrafenib for BRAFV600 mutant solid tumors. The single agent recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is 2 mg daily (QD). No clinical data is available on recommendation of trametinib dosing in various degrees of hepatic dysfunction (HD). This study was designed to evaluate RP2D, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of trametinib as primary endpoints in patients (pts) with genomically unselected advanced solid tumors with various degrees of HD. Methods Advanced cancer pts with ECOG ≤2, adequate renal and bone marrow functions, were stratified (NCI ODWG Criteria) into 4 HD groups: normal (NO), mild (ML), moderate (MD), severe (SV). NO group was enrolled as control subjects and was not evaluable for dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Trametinib was given QD on a 28-days cycle, with dose escalation based on a “3+3” design within each HD group (starting dose: NO, ML: 2mg; MD: 1.5 mg; SV: 1mg). Due to the long half-life of trametinib, PK samples were collected at days 15-16 in cycle 1. Differences in PK parameters among liver function groups were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Out of 46 pts enrolled (2 pts ineligible), 44 (NO=17, ML=7, MD (1.5mg)=4, MD (2mg)=5, SV (1mg)=9, SV (1.5mg)=2) were evaluable for safety and 22 for PK analysis. The most common cancer type was GI-non CRC cancer (n=16, 36%). The most common all-grade treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were acneiform rash (NO=53%, HD=48% of pts), nausea (NO=65%, HD=22%), diarrhea (NO=53%, HD=26%) and fatigue (NO=59%, HD=15%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 27% (n=12) of pts (NO=8, 47%; HD=4, 15%). No treatment related deaths occurred. DLT was evaluable in 15 pts (ML=6, MD (1.5mg)=3, MD (2mg)=2, SV (1mg)=3 and SV (1.5mg)=1). One DLT (grade 3 acneiform rash) was observed in an SV pt (1.5mg). Dose interruptions or reductions due to TRAEs occurred in 15 pts (34%) [NO=9, 53%; ML=2, 29%; MD (1.5mg)=1, 33%; MD (2mg)=2, 33%; SV (1mg)=1, 11%; SV (1.5mg)=1; 50%]. Best response was stable disease in all HD groups (33 to 75%) and 54% in NO group. There were no significant differences for PK parameters of Cmax (p=0.18), Cmin (p=0.16), Cavg (p=0.62), or AUC0-24 (p=0.11) (NO vs ML, NO vs MD, NO vs SV, ML vs MD, ML vs SV, MD vs SV), when trametinib was normalized to 2 mg dose. However, only limited PK data were available for the MD (n=3) and SV (n=3) groups compared to NO (n=10) and ML (n=6) groups. Trametinib is heavily protein bound, with no correlation between serum albumin level and unbound trametinib fraction (p=0.26). Conclusion RP2D for trametinib in ML pts is 2 mg QD. There are insufficient number of evaluable pts to declare RP2D for MD and SV HD groups. No DLTs were noted in the highest dose cohorts that reached 3 evaluable pts: 1.5 mg QD in MD group, and 1 mg QD in SV group. It may be appropriate for pts with MD and SV HD to start trametinib at 1.5 mg QD and 1 mg QD respectively, and monitored closely for toxicity.
Citation Format: Pei Jye Voon, Eric X. Chen, Helen X. Chen, Albert C. Lockhart, Solmaz Sahebjam, Karen Kelly, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Vivek Subbiah, Albiruni R. Razak, Daniel J. Renouf, Sebastien J. Hotte, Arti Singh, Philippe L. Bedard, Aaron R. Hansen, Ivy S. Percy, Lisa Wang, Lee-Anne Stayner, Lillian L. Siu, Anna Spreafico. A phase 1 pharmacokinetic trial of single agent trametinib a MEK inhibitor in advanced cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction: An NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group (ODWG) study (NCI 9591) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P035.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Jye Voon
- 1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada,
| | - Eric X. Chen
- 1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada,
| | - Helen X. Chen
- 2Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD,
| | | | | | - Karen Kelly
- 5UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Arti Singh
- 1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada,
| | | | | | - Ivy S. Percy
- 2Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD,
| | - Lisa Wang
- 1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Genta S, Aghababazadeh FA, Tsao MS, Hansen AR, Butler MO, Razak AR, Bedard PL, Wang BX, Trevor PJ, Hakgor S, Woo J, Haibe-Kains B, Siu LL, Spreafico A. Abstract LBA021: Immune resistance interrogation study (IRIS): Initial report of next generation sequencing (NGS) results in patients with primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD1/L1 antibodies. Mol Cancer Ther 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-21-lba021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The molecular mechanisms underlying primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies have not been comprehensively evaluated across different tumor types. Methods: The Immune Resistance Interrogation Study (IRIS; NCT04243720) is a prospective, investigator-initiated study at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, aimed to perform extensive multi-omic characterization of solid tumors with primary resistance (disease progression on first imaging; or stable disease <6 months) versus acquired resistance (partial or complete response; or stable disease ≥6 months) to antiPD-1/L1 agents. A one-time fresh tumor biopsy is collected from patients (pts) who have progressed on anti-PD1/L1 antibody-based treatment as their most recent line of therapy; liquid biopsy or archived FFPE tissue is allowed as alternates when fresh biopsy is insufficient. NGS was performed using Foundation One (324 genes) or Foundation Liquid (309 genes) panels. Frequencies of disrupted genes and variants were compared in pts with primary versus acquired resistance using Fisher’s exact test. The planned samples size of IRIS is 100 pts. Results: Among the first 35 pts enrolled, 22 (63%) had primary resistance and 13 (37%) had acquired resistance. The most common diagnosis was melanoma (17 pts; 49%); followed by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (13 pts; 37%); endometrial cancer (2 pts; 6%); pleural mesothelioma, gastroesophageal junction and colorectal cancer (1 pt each; 3%). Foundation One was performed in 23 pts (66%), 22 of them (63%) had biopsies with sufficient quality for NGS, and 1 (3%) had the analysis performed using archival FFPE tissue. The remaining 12 pts (34%) had Foundation Liquid testing done using liquid biopsy. Thirty-three pts (94%) had at least one oncogenic alteration. Genes most frequently altered included: TP53 in 16 patients (46%), TERT promoter in 12 pts (34%), CDKN2A in 9 pts (26%), PIK3CA in 6 pts (17%), and PTEN in 5 pts (14%). At the variant level, the most frequent alterations were: TERT promoter -146C>T mutation in 6 patients (17%), followed by TERT promoter -124C>T mutation in 5 patients (14%), FGF19/FGF4/FGF3 and CCND1 amplifications in 4 pts each (11%), and MDM2 amplification, CDK4 amplification and CDKN2A loss, detected in 3 pts each (9%). Pts with acquired resistance had a higher frequency of TP53 mutations (9/13 = 69%) compared to primary resistance pts (7/22 = 32%), p=0.04; however this was not significant when corrected for multiple testing. Interestingly, amplifications in CDK4, CCND1, FGF 19/FGF 3/FGF 4, MDM2 and mutations in NF1 were only identified in pts with primary resistant tumors. Conclusions: No significant differences in disrupted genes and variants were observed in the current analysis. However, this can be due to the small number of pts analyzed thus far. Accrual to this study is ongoing. A comparison of alterations in oncogenic pathways is planned to further define the genomic landscape of pts with primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD1/PDL1 blockade.
Citation Format: Sofia Genta, Farnoosh Abbas Aghababazadeh, Ming S Tsao, Aaron R Hansen, Marcus O Butler, Albiruni R Razak, Philippe L Bedard, Ben X Wang, Pugh J Trevor, Sevan Hakgor, Jeffrey Woo, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Lillian L Siu, Anna Spreafico. Immune resistance interrogation study (IRIS): Initial report of next generation sequencing (NGS) results in patients with primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD1/L1 antibodies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Genta
- 1Princess Margaret Cancer Center- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada,
| | | | - Ming S Tsao
- 2Princess Margaret Cancer Center- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada,
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- 2Princess Margaret Cancer Center- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada,
| | - Marcus O Butler
- 2Princess Margaret Cancer Center- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada,
| | - Albiruni R Razak
- 2Princess Margaret Cancer Center- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada,
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ben X Wang
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Pugh J Trevor
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sevan Hakgor
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Woo
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Lillian L Siu
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- 3Princess Margaret Cancer Center-University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zazuli Z, de Jong C, Xu W, Vijverberg SJH, Masereeuw R, Patel D, Mirshams M, Khan K, Cheng D, Ordonez-Perez B, Huang S, Spreafico A, Hansen AR, Goldstein DP, de Almeida JR, Bratman SV, Hope A, Knox JJ, Wong RKS, Darling GE, Kitchlu A, van Haarlem SWA, van der Meer F, van Lindert ASR, ten Heuvel A, Brouwer J, Ross CJD, Carleton BC, Egberts TCG, Herder GJM, Deneer VHM, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Liu G. Association between Genetic Variants and Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity: A Genome-Wide Approach and Validation Study. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11111233. [PMID: 34834585 PMCID: PMC8623115 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate genetic risk factors for cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity by investigating not previously studied genetic risk variants and further examining previously reported genetic associations. A genome-wide study (GWAS) was conducted in genetically estimated Europeans in a discovery cohort of cisplatin-treated adults from Toronto, Canada, followed by a candidate gene approach in a validation cohort from the Netherlands. In addition, previously reported genetic associations were further examined in both the discovery and validation cohorts. The outcome, nephrotoxicity, was assessed in two ways: (i) decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI) and (ii) increased serum creatinine according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 for acute kidney injury (AKI-CTCAE). Four different Illumina arrays were used for genotyping. Standard quality control was applied for pre- and post-genotype imputation data. In the discovery cohort (n = 608), five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reached genome-wide significance. The A allele in rs4388268 (minor allele frequency = 0.23), an intronic variant of the BACH2 gene, was consistently associated with increased risk of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in both definitions, meeting genome-wide significance (β = −8.4, 95% CI −11.4–−5.4, p = 3.9 × 10−8) for decreased eGFR and reaching suggestive association (OR = 3.9, 95% CI 2.3–6.7, p = 7.4 × 10−7) by AKI-CTCAE. In the validation cohort of 149 patients, this variant was identified with the same direction of effect (eGFR: β = −1.5, 95% CI −5.3–2.4, AKI-CTCAE: OR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.8–3.5). Findings of our previously published candidate gene study could not be confirmed after correction for multiple testing. Genetic predisposition of BACH2 (rs4388268) might be important in the development of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, indicating opportunities for mechanistic understanding, tailored therapy and preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zulfan Zazuli
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands or (Z.Z.); (S.J.H.V.)
- Department of Pharmacology-Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Bandung Institute of Technology, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
| | - Corine de Jong
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, 3430 EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands;
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (T.C.G.E.); (V.H.M.D.)
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | - Susanne J. H. Vijverberg
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands or (Z.Z.); (S.J.H.V.)
| | - Rosalinde Masereeuw
- Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Devalben Patel
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - Maryam Mirshams
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - Khaleeq Khan
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - Dangxiao Cheng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - Bayardo Ordonez-Perez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada;
| | - Shaohui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (S.H.); (S.V.B.); (A.H.); (R.K.S.W.)
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.G.); (J.R.d.A.)
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - Aaron R. Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - David P. Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.G.); (J.R.d.A.)
| | - John R. de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.G.); (J.R.d.A.)
| | - Scott V. Bratman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (S.H.); (S.V.B.); (A.H.); (R.K.S.W.)
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (S.H.); (S.V.B.); (A.H.); (R.K.S.W.)
| | - Jennifer J. Knox
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
| | - Rebecca K. S. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (S.H.); (S.V.B.); (A.H.); (R.K.S.W.)
| | - Gail E. Darling
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada;
| | - Abhijat Kitchlu
- Department of Medicine, Nephrology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | | | - Femke van der Meer
- Department of Pulmonology, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Anne S. R. van Lindert
- Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Alexandra ten Heuvel
- Department of Pulmonology, Groene Hart Hospital, 2803 HH Gouda, The Netherlands;
| | - Jan Brouwer
- Department of Pulmonology, Rivierenland Hospital, 4002 WP Tiel, The Netherlands;
| | - Colin J. D. Ross
- British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada; (C.J.D.R.); (B.C.C.)
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Bruce C. Carleton
- British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada; (C.J.D.R.); (B.C.C.)
- Division of Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes Program, British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Toine C. G. Egberts
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (T.C.G.E.); (V.H.M.D.)
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerarda J. M. Herder
- Meander Medical Center, Department of Pulmonology, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands;
| | - Vera H. M. Deneer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (T.C.G.E.); (V.H.M.D.)
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anke H. Maitland-van der Zee
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands or (Z.Z.); (S.J.H.V.)
- Correspondence: (A.H.M.-v.d.Z.); (G.L.); Tel.: +31-(0)20-566-8137 (A.H.M.-v.d.Z.); +416-946-4501 (ext. 3428) (G.L.)
| | - Geoffrey Liu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada; (D.P.); (M.M.); (K.K.); (D.C.); (A.S.); (A.R.H.); (J.J.K.)
- Departments of Medical Biophysics, Pharmacology and Toxicology, and Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Correspondence: (A.H.M.-v.d.Z.); (G.L.); Tel.: +31-(0)20-566-8137 (A.H.M.-v.d.Z.); +416-946-4501 (ext. 3428) (G.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Parmar A, Qazi AA, Stundzia A, Sim HW, Lewin J, Metser U, O'Malley M, Hansen AR. Development of a radiomic signature for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 16:E113-E119. [PMID: 34672933 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) improves overall survival, but pathological response rates are low. Predictive biomarkers could select those patients most likely to benefit from NAC. Radiomics technology offers a novel, noninvasive method to identify predictive biomarkers. Our study aimed to develop a predictive radiomics signature for response to NAC in MIBC. METHODS An institutional bladder cancer database was used to identify MIBC patients who were treated with NAC followed by radical cystectomy. Patients were classified into responders and non-responders based on pathological response. Bladder lesions on computed tomography images taken prior to NAC were contoured. Extracted radiomics features were used train a radial basis function support vector machine classifier to learn a prediction rule to distinguish responders from non-responders. The discriminative accuracy of the classifier was then tested using a nested 10-fold cross-validation protocol. RESULTS Nineteen patients who underwent NAC followed by radical cystectomy were found to be eligible for analysis. Of these, nine (48%) patients were classified as responders and 10 (52%) as non-responders. Nineteen bladder lesions were contoured. The sensitivity, specificity and discriminative accuracy were 52.9±9.4%, 69.4±8.6%, and 62.1±6.1%, respectively. This corresponded to an area under the curve of 0.63±0.08 (p=0.20). CONCLUSIONS Our developed radiomics signature demonstrated modest discriminative accuracy; however, these results may have been influenced by small sample size and heterogeneity in image acquisition. Future research using novel methods for computer-based image analysis on a larger cohort of patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambica Parmar
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abdul Aziz Qazi
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Hao-Wen Sim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martin O'Malley
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Oliva M, Chepeha D, Araujo DV, Diaz-Mejia JJ, Olson P, Prawira A, Spreafico A, Bratman SV, Shek T, de Almeida J, R Hansen A, Hope A, Goldstein D, Weinreb I, Smith S, Perez-Ordoñez B, Irish J, Torti D, Bruce JP, Wang BX, Fortuna A, Pugh TJ, Der-Torossian H, Shazer R, Attanasio N, Au Q, Tin A, Feeney J, Sethi H, Aleshin A, Chen I, Siu L. Antitumor immune effects of preoperative sitravatinib and nivolumab in oral cavity cancer: SNOW window-of-opportunity study. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-003476. [PMID: 34599023 PMCID: PMC8488751 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sitravatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets TYRO3, AXL, MERTK and the VEGF receptor family, is predicted to increase the M1 to M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages ratio in the tumor microenvironment and have synergistic antitumor activity in combination with anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 agents. SNOW is a window-of-opportunity study designed to evaluate the immune and molecular effects of preoperative sitravatinib and nivolumab in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS Patients with newly-diagnosed untreated T2-4a, N0-2 or T1 >1 cm-N2 oral cavity carcinomas were eligible. All patients received sitravatinib 120 mg daily from day 1 up to 48 hours pre-surgery and one dose of nivolumab 240 mg on day 15. Surgery was planned between day 23 and 30. Standard of care adjuvant radiotherapy was given based on clinical stage. Tumor photographs, fresh tumor biopsies and blood samples were collected at baseline, at day 15 after sitravatinib alone, and at surgery after sitravatinib-nivolumab combination. Tumor flow cytometry, multiplex immunofluorescence staining and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) were performed on tumor biopsies to study changes in immune-cell populations. Tumor whole-exome sequencing and circulating tumor DNA and cell-free DNA were evaluated at each time point. RESULTS Ten patients were included. Grade 3 toxicity occurred in one patient (hypertension); one patient required sitravatinib dose reduction, and one patient required discontinuation and surgery delay due to G2 thrombocytopenia. Nine patients had clinical-to-pathological downstaging, with one complete response. Independent pathological treatment response (PTR) assessment confirmed a complete PTR and two major PTRs. With a median follow-up of 21 months, all patients are alive with no recurrence. Circulating tumor DNA and cell-free DNA dynamics correlated with clinical and pathological response and distinguished two patient groups with different tumor biological behavior after sitravatinib alone (1A) versus sitravatinib-nivolumab (1B). Tumor immunophenotyping and scRNAseq analyses revealed differential changes in the expression of immune cell populations and sitravatinib-targeted and hypoxia-related genes in group 1A vs 1B patients. CONCLUSIONS The SNOW study shows sitravatinib plus nivolumab is safe and leads to deep clinical and pathological responses in oral cavity carcinomas. Multi-omic biomarker analyses dissect the differential molecular effects of sitravatinib versus the sitravatinib-nivolumab and revealed patients with distinct tumor biology behavior. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03575598.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Oliva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Catala d' Oncologia, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas Chepeha
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel V Araujo
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Base São Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Javier Diaz-Mejia
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Olson
- Department of Research, Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Amy Prawira
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sidney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scott V Bratman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tina Shek
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilan Weinreb
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Smith
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan Irish
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dax Torti
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey P Bruce
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ben X Wang
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony Fortuna
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor J Pugh
- Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ronald Shazer
- Clinical Development, Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Qingyan Au
- Neogenomics Laboratories, Fort Myers, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Isan Chen
- Clinical Development, Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Lillian Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|