Evaluation of a National Radiation Oncology Research and Mentorship Program

PURPOSE

The Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Annual Scientific Meeting Medical Student Research and Mentorship Award was established in 2020 to support medical students pursuing radiation oncology (RO) research and RO as a career. This study is an evaluation of the effect of this national research and mentorship award on medical students, resident mentors, and research supervisors over 3 iterations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three separate surveys were created for medical student mentees, RO resident mentors, and attending research supervisors. These surveys were developed using best practice strategies for medical education surveys and circulated for peer review among experts in oncology medical education. The surveys were sent to the 52 individuals (18 students, 18 residents, 16 supervisors) who participated in 3 cycles of Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology ASM MSRMA (2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23). After anonymization, quantitative answers were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and narrative responses were evaluated using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

There was a 90% survey response rate. For medical student mentees, the award maintained (71%) or increased (24%) interest in pursuing an RO career. Students reported receiving helpful tips for residency applications and insight into RO residency, research, and career planning advice. Only the first student cohort currently has matching results for residency, with approximately 50% matching to RO. All resident mentor respondents felt the program either maintained or increased motivation to mentor students in RO. Research project supervisors unanimously enjoyed their role in this program and would recommend and participate in this program again.

CONCLUSIONS

A national research and mentorship award for medical students has shown a positive effect on participants. Medical students felt this award program motivated them to continue pursuing oncology research and a potential career in RO. The program also enhanced mentorship skills in residents and research supervisors, which encourages further RO mentorship, teaching, and exposure for future generations of students.

Evaluation of National Conference-Associated Medical Student Research and Mentorship Award for Medical Students, Resident Mentors, and Radiation Oncologist Supervisors

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

In 2020, the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) Medical Student Research and Mentorship Award (CARO MSRMA) was created to support medical students pursuing radiation oncology (RO) research and RO as a career. This study aims to evaluate the impact of three consecutive years of this award on medical students, RO resident mentors, and research supervisors.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Medical student mentees, resident mentors, and staff RO research supervisors who participated in one of three iterations of CARO MSRMA (2020-2022 inclusive) were identified. Three separate surveys were developed for these groups using best practice strategies for medical education surveys and circulated for peer-review amongst experts in oncology medical education. The surveys were sent to 52 participants: 18 medical students (Group 1), 18 RO resident mentors (Group 2), and 16 attending RO supervisors (Group 3). After anonymization, quantitative answers were analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative responses were evaluated using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 92% (48/52). For Group 1, the award maintained (71%) or increased interest in pursuing an RO career (24%). Aspects of the award rated most important were: financial support to attend the CARO Annual Scientific Meeting (mean rating 4.8/5) and mentorship with an RO resident (mean rating 4.6/5). Through mentorship, 60% of students obtained valuable information about a career in RO, 60% reported helpful residency matching (CaRMS) advice, and another 60% attained insight into RO residency. For Group 2 respondents, 100% felt the program either maintained or increased their motivation to mentor students in RO. For Group 3, 100% agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed their role as a supervisor, would participate in the program again, and would recommend the opportunity to others. All three Groups agreed or strongly agreed that it would be useful for CARO to create a virtual network of radiation oncologists, residents, and medical students to share and access shadowing and research opportunities to encourage national RO exposure and collaboration. The first cohort of medical student awardees has CaRMS matching results, with approximately 50% matching to RO.

CONCLUSION

A national conference-associated medical student research and mentorship award has had a positive impact on all three populations involved: medical students in motivation to continue pursuing RO research and career opportunities, RO resident mentors in enhancing mentorship skills, and attending supervisors in inspiring the next generation of prospective RO colleagues. Further research is recommended to determine the impact of the award on subsequent Residency Specialty matching, and whether expansion of this award to other opportunities may be beneficial.

Incidence and predictive factors of retropharyngeal lymph node metastases in patients with oropharyngeal cancer undergoing multimodality treatment planning imaging

BACKGROUND

We investigated the incidence and predictive factors of retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastases in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) undergoing multimodality treatment planning imaging before radiotherapy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with OPC treated with curative-intent radiotherapy from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment planning comprised contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) unless contraindicated.

RESULTS

Of 300 patients, 66 (22%) had radiological evidence of RPLN involvement on planning images, compared to 17 (6%) on diagnostic CT alone. On multivariate analysis, RPLN involvement was statistically (p < 0.05) associated with tonsil, soft palate, and posterior pharyngeal wall primaries, and with disease extension to the soft palate or vallecula.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodality treatment planning imaging reveals a high rate of RPLN metastases from OPC compared to diagnostic CT alone. Patients with tonsil, soft palate, or posterior pharyngeal wall primaries or disease extending to the soft palate or vallecula appear at higher risk.

Trial Participation is Not Associated with Better Biochemical Recurrence-free Survival in a Large Cohort of External Beam Radiotherapy-Treated Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

AIMS

There is a widespread belief that outcomes of cancer patients treated within clinical trials might not be representative of the outcomes obtained within standard clinical settings. We sought to investigate the effect of trial participation on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in localised, D'Amico intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We relied on a study population treated with EBRT between January 2001 and January 2021 at a single tertiary care centre, stratified according to trial enrolment. Separate Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models tested BCR-free survival at 60 months within intermediate- and high-risk EBRT patients, after adjustment for covariables. Additionally, the analyses were refitted after inverse probability treatment weighting was performed separately for both risk subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 932 eligible patients, 635 (68%) and 297 (32%) had intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, respectively. Overall, 53% of patients were trial participants. BCR rates were 11 versus 5% (P = 0.27) and 12 versus 14% (P = 0.08) in trial participants versus non-participants for intermediate- and high-risk subgroups, respectively. Differences in patient and clinical characteristics were recorded. Trial participation status failed to reach predictor status in multivariable Cox regression models for BCR in both intermediate-risk (hazard ratio 1.34; 95% confidence interval 0.71-2.49; P = 0.4) and high-risk patients (hazard ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.45-2.34; P = 0.9). Virtually the same results were recorded in inverse probability treatment weighting cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Relying on a large cohort of EBRT-treated intermediate- and high-risk patients, no BCR differences were recorded between trial participants and non-participants after accounting for confounders.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers

Despite the significant evolution of radiation therapy (RT) techniques in recent years, many patients with head and neck cancer still experience significant toxicities during and after treatments. The increased soft tissue contrast and functional sequences of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are particularly attractive in head and neck cancer and have led to the increasing development of magnetic resonance-guided RT (MRgRT). This approach refers to the inclusion of the additional information acquired from a diagnostic or planning MRI in radiation treatment planning, and now extends to online high-quality daily imaging generated by the recently developed MR-Linac. MRgRT holds numerous potentials, including enhanced baseline and planning evaluations, anatomical and functional treatment adaptation, potential for hypofractionation, and multiparametric assessment of response. This article offers a structured review of the current literature on these established and upcoming roles of MRI for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing RT.

Impact of Statin Use on Localized Prostate Cancer Outcomes after Radiation Therapy: Long-Term Follow-Up

Simple Summary

Statins represent a promising class of agents to improve clinical outcomes of prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, but the results of numerous studies are contradictory. We aimed to assess the impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence in a large database of patients of different risk groups undergoing different modalities of radiation therapy. We evaluated 3555 patients treated with curative external beam radiotherapy, low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We found no improvement in biochemical recurrence-free survival in statin users, regardless of radiotherapy modality. Our study underlines the need to search for biomarkers that predict an additive effect of statins and determine which patients treated with radiotherapy may benefit from statins as an anticancer drug.

Abstract

The impact of statin use on localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial, especially for patients treated with radiation therapy. We assessed the impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients treated for PCa with different modalities of radiation therapy. We evaluated 3555 patients undergoing radiation therapy between January 2001 and January 2022. The impact of statin use on BCR was analyzed for three treatment groups: external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy (LDR), and EBRT plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (EBRT + HDR). Median follow-up was 52 months among 1208 patients treated with EBRT, 1679 patients treated with LDR, and 599 patients treated with EBRT + HDR. A total of 1544 (43%) patients were taking a statin at the time of treatment, and 497 (14%) patients were in the D’Amico high-risk group. Only intermediate-risk patients treated with LDR fared better with statin use in univariate analysis (p = 0.025). This association was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.18–1.10, p = 0.06). Statin use was not associated with a reduced risk of BCR in patients treated with radiation therapy. In the era of precision medicine, further investigation is needed to assess the benefit of statins in well-defined patients.