1
|
Upadhyay R, Elguindy AN, Sengupta S, Wang K, Beyer S, Thomas EM, Raval R, Palmer JD. Initial Report of Boswellia Serrata for Management of Cerebral Radiation Necrosis after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S172-S173. [PMID: 37784429 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Radiation necrosis (RN) is a concerning late toxicity after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases. Oral corticosteroids are the mainstay of management; however, they are not optimal for long-term use given multiple side effects and drug interactions, particularly with the emergence of immunotherapy for several cancers. Boswellia serrata (BS) is an over-the-counter supplement used for its anti-inflammatory properties and has been recently shown to reduce cerebral edema after brain RT. We evaluated the response rates with BS in a series of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) who developed RN. MATERIALS/METHODS We included patients who developed RN after SRS for brain metastases at our institution from 2020-2022 and were treated with BS. Patients were prescribed over the counter BS 4.2-4.5g daily in divided doses. Follow-up MRI imaging was obtained every 2-3 months after starting BS. Response was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Primary endpoint was ≥25% decrease in edema volume on T2-FLAIR MRI from baseline. Patients were censored if they had tumor progression or repeat RT to necrotic area, or death. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival estimates. RESULTS A total of 50 patients received BS for Grade 1-3 CTCAE v5.0 RN (G1 = 11, G2 = 36, and G3 = 3). Median age was 62.8 years (range 36.9 - 50) and median RT dose was 24 Gy in 3 fractions. Median time to RN after SRS was 10 months(m). Median follow-up after starting BS was 6m and 40 patients had at least 1 follow up MRI available to evaluate response. The best response was complete response (CR) in 15% patients and partial response (PR) in 40% while 35% had stable disease (SD) and 10% had progressive disease. Median time to CR was 9m (6-12m) and PR was 6m (3-12m). Percentage of patients who had any response (CR or PR) at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 25%, 60%, 43% and 50%, respectively. 56% patients had symptomatic RN, of which 35.7% had improvement in symptoms with BS alone, while 64% required steroid use. Overall, median duration of response in patients with CR, PR or SD was 7.5m(range 2-31m). Salvage treatment for RN was steroids (33), surgery (4), Bevacizumab (5) or hyperbaric oxygen therapy (1). No patients had any CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicities. 3 patients (6%) had any side-effects all of whom had Grade 1-2 gastrointestinal intolerance or diarrhea. 2 patients stopped treatment due to enrolment on an immunotherapy clinical trial. Overall, 39 patients remained on BS at last follow-up or death. CONCLUSION We observed >50% response rates with use of BS in our cohort of patients with Grade 1-3 RN after SRS. More than 1/3rd patients with symptomatic RN were able to avoid long-term steroid use. BS is an easily available over-the-counter drug that appears to be a safe and promising treatment option for RN, and can potentially decrease steroid dependence in these patients, reducing the risk of several side-effects. Further prospective studies to compare Boswellia with placebo is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A N Elguindy
- The James Cancer Center, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - K Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - S Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - E M Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - R Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - J D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hall J, Wang K, Lui KP, Darawsheh R, Shumway JW, Carey LA, Hayes KR, Lee CB, Moschos S, Sengupta S, Chaudhary R, Yogendran L, Struve TD, Vatner RE, Pater LE, Breneman JC, Weiner AA, Shen C. Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Concurrent Targeted Systemic Therapy for Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e107. [PMID: 37784639 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Data describing the safety and efficacy of central nervous system (CNS)-active targeted systemic therapies in combination with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS, 1 fraction) and/or radiotherapy (SRT, 3-5 fractions) for brain metastases are emerging but limited. We report rates of local and intracranial failure and radiation necrosis in patients receiving CNS-active targeted systemic therapy and SRS/SRT. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with intact brain metastases at two institutions from 2009-2022 who were treated with SRS/SRT and CNS-active targeted systemic therapy in any sequence. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months after SRS/SRT with brain MRI. Patients typically stopped the targeted agent 2-4 days prior to radiation and resumed 2-4 days after. Targeted therapies included inhibitors of ALK/ROS1 (Alectinib, Ceritinib, Crizotinib, Lorlatinib), EGFR (Afatinib, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Osimertinib), BRAF (Dabrafenib, Encorafenib, Vemurafenib), MEK (Binimetinib, Trametinib), CDK 4/6 (Abemaciclib, Palbociclib, Ribociclib), HER2 (Afatinib, Lapatinib, Neratinib, Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, T-DM1, T-DXd, Tucatinib), KRAS (Adagrasib and Sotorasib), PARP (Niraparib, Olaparib), VEGF(R) (Axitinib, Bevacizumab, Ramucirumab), and less-selective tyrosine (receptor) kinase inhibitors (Bosutinib, Brigatinib, Entrectinib, Lenvatinib, Pazopanib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib). Local failure (LF) and radiation necrosis were determined radiographically with clinical impression (grade 2 (symptomatic) or higher (G2+)) and compared between different systemic agents. RESULTS The study included 95 patients with 310 metastases (SRS 246, SRT 64 metastases). Most common primary histologies were non-small cell lung cancer (36% 34/95), breast cancer (28% 27/95), and melanoma (16% 15/95). Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 80% (76/95) and 55% (52/95), respectively. Median follow-up was 16.6 (range 3-91) months. Median tumor size was 7mm (range 1-75mm). Median number of brain metastases per patient was 2.5 (range 1-12). The G2+ radiation necrosis rate was 5.8% (18/310) while the LF rate was 9.7% (30/310) per metastasis. There was no significant difference in G2+ radiation necrosis by class of targeted therapy. Sixty-two percent (59/95) of patients experienced distant intracranial failure. Median intracranial progression free survival (PFS) was 8.0 (range 0.4-61.4) months. CONCLUSION Although heterogeneous, patients treated with SRS/SRT and ongoing CNS-active targeted systemic therapies have on average >6 month intracranial PFS and little evidence of significant toxicity. We observed <6% G2+ radiation necrosis for this cohort, and no particular class of agent was associated with a significantly higher rate of G2+ radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - K Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - K P Lui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - R Darawsheh
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - J W Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - K Reeder Hayes
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C B Lee
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Moschos
- Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - R Chaudhary
- Division of Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - L Yogendran
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - T D Struve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - R E Vatner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - L E Pater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - J C Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - A A Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - C Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
MacDonald T, Sackett JJ, Gaskill-Shipley M, Rao R, Chaudhary R, Curry R, Forbes J, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M, Yogendran L, Sengupta S, Struve Iii TD, Vatner RE, Pater LE, Mascia AE, Breneman JC, Wang K. Neurologic Events and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Proton and Photon Reirradiation for High Grade Non-Codeleted Gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e133-e134. [PMID: 37784697 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Patients undergoing reirradiation (ReRT) for high grade glioma are at risk for tumor progression, pseudoprogression, and radiation necrosis. We investigated factors associated with neurologic events and disease control after re-irradiation with protons and photons at a single academic center. MATERIALS/METHODS We reviewed records and MRIs of patients receiving scanning beam proton (since center opening in 2016) and photon (since 2015) reirradiation in ≥10 fractions for grade 3 anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and grade 4 glioblastoma (GBM), excluding 1p19q co-deleted oligodendrogliomas and extensive multifocal/leptomeningeal disease. The primary endpoint was time from ReRT to ≥ grade 2 pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis (PsP/RN, grade 2: moderate symptoms requiring outpatient steroids/bevacizumab, grade 3: severe symptoms leading to admission or surgical intervention). Dose was converted to EQD2 using a/b = 3. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate survival and time to PsP/RN. RESULTS A total of 53 patients were included (26 protons, 27 photons, median KPS 80). Patients receiving protons had more favorable features. Compared to the photons, the proton group was younger (48 vs. 58) and more likely to have AA (46% vs. 22%) and resection within 3 months (42% vs 26%). The proton group also had a longer interval from prior RT (57 vs. 39 months) and were less likely to receive bevacizumab at reRT (15% vs. 59%). CTV was 130 cc for protons vs 99 cc for photons, and most had active disease at time of ReRT identified on planning MRI (76% protons, 85% photons). Median OS was 10.5 months (14.1 months protons, 8.1 months photons), with time from initial RT the only significant factor on multivariate analysis. Median PFS was 9.4 months (9.8 months protons, 6.2 months photons). 9 patients (18%) had ≥ grade 3 PsP/RN (8 proton, 1 photon) and 21 patients (41%) had ≥ grade 2 PsP/RN (16 proton, 5 photon). Grade 3 events included 1 seizure (photon group), 1 hemorrhage, 1 thalamic stroke, 1 shunt placement, 1 re-resection, and PSP4 4 PsP/RN requiring admission. Protons were associated shorter time to ≥ grade 2 PsP/RN (4 months vs. not reached, p = 0.027). When accounting for bevacizumab use at time of reRT, the association between protons and PsP/RN lost significance but there remained a trend (grade 2, p = 0.095, HR 2.4; grade 3, p = 0.105, HR 5.8). CTV, MGMT status, EQD2, and interval from prior RT were not associated with PsP/RN. CONCLUSION High grade neurologic events were common in patients with predominantly active, unresected high grade gliomas receiving ReRT. Though ascertainment and survival bias are significant limitations, pseudoprogression and necrosis appeared to be more prominent in patients receiving protons. These results contribute to ongoing efforts to both optimize ReRT for high grade glioma and investigate biologic effects of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - J J Sackett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | - R Rao
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - R Chaudhary
- Division of Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - R Curry
- CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Covington, KY
| | - J Forbes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - N Andaluz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - M Zuccarello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - L Yogendran
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - T D Struve Iii
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - R E Vatner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - L E Pater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - A E Mascia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - J C Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - K Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hayne D, Stockler M, Martin A, Mccombie S, Zebic D, Krieger L, Anderson P, Bastick P, Beardsley E, Blatt A, Frydenberg M, Green W, Grummet J, Hawks C, Ischia J, Mitterdorfer A, Patel M, Roberts M, Sengupta S, Srivastav R, Winter M, Redfern A, Davis I. Adding Mitomycin to BCG as adjuvant intravesical therapy for high-risk, non-muscle-invasive -bladder cancer: A randomised phase 3 trial: The BCG+MM Study (ANZUP1301). Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00567-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
5
|
Sengupta S, Bose S. 396 A Rare Encounter of “Forgotten Disease”. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac269.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
With the advent and prompt use of antibiotics after throat infections, the rare entity of Necrobacillosis has almost disappeared in clinical practice. Here we present a case of a fit and well 27-year-old lady who was brought into A&E with septic shock, DIC and MODS after initial diagnosis of a sore throat 4 days ago which was treated by oral antibiotics. She was found to have bilateral patchy consolidations which later became necrotic cavities, empyema thoracis, peritonitis and abscess cavities in abdomen with evolving splenic abscess, prolonged QT and ectopics and type 2 respiratory failure. She was resuscitated, intubated, and transferred to the ICU. With an isolate of Fusobacterium necrophorum from blood culture Meropenem, clindamycin and metronidazole were started. However, over the next few days of treatment, lack of clinical response prompted antibiotics changing, and surgical drainage of abscesses in chest and abdomen. Eventually after a considerable period of abdominal abscess drainage and about 3 weeks of metronidazole and other antibiotics followed by Piperacillin and tazobactam for another 3 weeks the patient recovered from sepsis and was stepped down to ward. This case though rare is a good example of the benefits of surgical drainage and prolonged antibiotics for septic patients with collections. A rapid weaning only results in re-collection and clinical deterioration, or recurrent collection as happened to this patient. This is a rare case of Lemierre's syndrome which depicts the surgical difficulties faced due to recurrent abscess cavities formed in this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sengupta
- Frimley Park Hospital , Camberley , United Kingdom
| | - S Bose
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shukla V, Gera B, Ganju S, Varma S, Maheshwari N, Guchhait P, Sengupta S. Application of CFD model for Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners to formulate an empirical correlation for integratral containment analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
7
|
Sengupta S, Handoo A, Mehta S, Kaushik M. T105 POCT in critical care: An accuracy check! Clin Chim Acta 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.04.573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
8
|
Sørli JB, Sengupta S, Jensen ACØ, Nikiforov V, Clausen PA, Hougaard KS, Højriis S, Frederiksen M, Hadrup N. Risk assessment of consumer spray products using in vitro lung surfactant function inhibition, exposure modelling and chemical analysis. Food Chem Toxicol 2022; 164:112999. [PMID: 35427705 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.112999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Consumer spray products release aerosols that can potentially be inhaled and reach the deep parts of the lungs. A thin layer of liquid, containing a mixture of proteins and lipids known as lung surfactant, coats the alveoli. Inhibition of lung surfactant function can lead to acute loss of lung function. We focused on two groups of spray products; 8 cleaning and 13 impregnation products, and in the context of risk assessment, used an in vitro method for assessing inhibition of lung surfactant function. Original spray-cans were used to generate aerosols to measure aerodynamic particle size distribution. We recreated a real-life exposure scenario to estimate the alveolar deposited dose. Most impregnation products inhibited lung surfactant function at the lowest aerosolization rate, whereas only two cleaning products inhibited function at the highest rates. We used inhibitory dose and estimated alveolar deposition to calculate the margin of safety (MoS). The MoS for the inhibitory products was ≤1 for the impregnation products, while much larger for the cleaning products (>880). This risk assessment focused on the risk of lung surfactant function disruption and provides knowledge on an endpoint of lung toxicity that is not investigated by the currently available OECD test guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Sørli
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - S Sengupta
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - A C Ø Jensen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - V Nikiforov
- Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Tromsø, Norway.
| | - P A Clausen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - K S Hougaard
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Sara Højriis
- COWI, Parallelvej 2, Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark; DHI A/S, Agern Allé 5, Hørsholm, Denmark.
| | - M Frederiksen
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - N Hadrup
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NFA), 105 Lersø Parkallé, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Brien J, Manning T, Kelly B, Chen K, Merrilees D, Joseph J, Sengupta S, Goad J, Bolton D, Lawrenstchuk N. Sealing the leak: A 10-year multicentre experience managing refractory post retroperitoneal lymph node dissection chylous ascites. Eur Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(22)00647-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
10
|
Sarkar B, Munshi A, Shahid T, Sengupta S, Bhaskar R, Ganesh T, Paul A, Bhattacharjee B, Pun R, Imbulgoda N, Biswal S, Rastogi K, Bansal K, Baba A, Yasmin T, Bhattacharya J, Ghosh T, De A, Chatterjee P, Pradhan A. Growth Characteristics of Woman Radiation Oncologists in South Asia: Assessment of Gender Neutrality and Leadership Position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Sengupta S, Prendergast B, Furnaz S, Ronderos R, Almaghraby A, Asch FM, Blechova K, Zaky H, Dworakowski R, Izumi C, Lancellotti P, Habib G. Socio-economic variations in the clinical presentation, etiology and outcome of infective endocarditis in the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European Infective Endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life threatening disease associated with high mortality and morbidity worldwide. We sought to determine how socio-economic factors may influence variations in epidemiology, clinical presentation, investigation and management (and their consequence upon clinical outcomes) in a large international multi-centre registry.
Methods
The ESC-EORPEURO-ENDO registry comprises a prospective cohort of 3116 adult patients admitted to 156 hospitals in 40 countries with IE between January 2016 and March 2018. We analysed the complete dataset to assess potentially important determinants of variation according to World Bank economic stratification (high income (Group 1) [73.8%]; upper-middle income (Group 2) [17.1%]; lower-middle income (Group 3)[9.1%]).
Results
Patients in Group 3 were younger (median age [IQR]: Group 1 - 66 [54–75] years; Group 2 - 57 [40–68] years; Group 3 - 33 [26–43] years; p<0.001) with a higher prevalence of smoking, intravenous drug use and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (all p<0.001). Group 3 patients with IE presented later (median [IQR) days since symptom onset: Group 1 - 12 [3–35]; Group 2 - 20 [6–51]; Group 3 - 31 [12–62]; p<0.001) and were more likely to develop congestive heart failure (13.6%; 11.3%; and 22.6%, respectively; p<0.001), septic shock (8.3%; 11.1%; 13.4%; p=0.007), and persistent fever for greater than 7 days (9.6%; 14.4%; 27.9%; p<0.001) following hospital admission. Surgery was performed less frequently in Group 3 (75.4%, 76.8% and 51.3% in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; p<0.001) and mortality was highest in the poorest countries (14.6%; 23.6% and 23.7%, respectively; p<0.001).
Conclusion
Socio-economic factors influence the clinical profile of patients presenting with IE across the world. Despite being younger, patients from the poorest countries presented with more frequent complications and higher mortality associated with delayed diagnosis and less frequent use of surgery.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sengupta
- Sengupta Hospital and Research Institute, Nagpur, India
| | | | - S Furnaz
- National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - R Ronderos
- Institute of Cardiological Research UBA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Almaghraby
- Alexandria University hospital, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - F M Asch
- Medstar Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | | | - H Zaky
- Dubai Hospital and Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - C Izumi
- National Cerebral & Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | | | - G Habib
- Hospital La Timone of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sengupta S, Mohan J, MacGowan G, Jakovljevic D. Peak atrial longitudinal strain predicts exercise tolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The present study i) determined left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) strains at rest and in response to exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and ii) assessed the relationship between LA and LV strains and exercise tolerance.
Methods
Forty HFpEF patients (age 59±7 yrs; 25 females), 40 stable HFrEF patients (age 57+6 yrs, 15 females) and 20 controls (age 56+6 yrs, 13 females) underwent baseline clinical and biochemical assessment, resting and exercise stress transthoracic echocardiography using modified Bruce protocol. Speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed to define peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS). LA stiffness index and LV stiffness index were also derived.
Results
Compared to healthy controls, HFpEF and HFrEF showed significantly lower PALS at rest (34.03±1.85 vs. 23.06±4.69 vs. 11.51±1.44%, p<0.01) and after exercise (34.41±1.24 vs. 18.48±3.51 vs 10.47±1.49, p<0.01 for both). In response to exercise, the PALS significantly reduced in HFpEF by 26%, but only 8% in HFrEF and remained unchanged in controls. LA stiffness index was higher in HFpEF and HFrEF compared to healthy controls at rest (0.57±0.22 vs. 1.19±0.63 vs. 0.27±0.06, p<0.01) and in response to exercise (0.83±0.46 vs. 1.37±0.63 vs. 0.33±0.04, p<0.01). Compared to healthy controls, HFpEF and HFrEF demonstrated significantly lower LVGLS at rest (−20.27±0.98 vs. −15.89±2.72 vs.-11.14±3.40%, p<0.01) and after exercise (−19.9±0.8 vs.-15.5±3.18 vs.-11.01±2.6%, p<0.01). LV stiffness index was significantly higher in HFpEF and HFrEF compared to healthy controls at rest (0.16±0.05 vs. 0.14±0.07 vs. 0.11±0.02, p<0.01) and in response to exercise (0.18±0.07 vs. 0.15±0.06 vs. 0.13±0.02, p<0.01). Exercise tolerance i.e. exercise duration was significantly lower by 28% and 30% in HFpEF and HFrEF compared with controls (363±152 vs. 352±91 vs. 505±42, p<0.01). There was a significant relationship between peak atrial longitudinal strain and exercise tolerance in HFpEF (r=0.32, p=0.04).There was no significant relationship between exercise tolerance and LVGLS (r=0.058, p=0.72), LA stiffness (r=−0.17, p=0.3), LV stiffness (r=0.88, p=.59). There was no significant relationship between exercise tolerance and PALS (r=0.021, p=0.89) or LVGLS (r=0.12, p=0.48) in HFrEF.
Conclusion
HFpEF and HFrEF are associated with reduced left atrial and left ventricular strains and increased arial and ventricular stiffness.Peak atrial longitudinal strain is a significant determinant of exercise tolerance in HFpEF but not in HFrEF.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sengupta
- Sengupta Hospital and Research Institute, Nagpur, India
| | - J.C Mohan
- Jaipur Golden Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - G.A MacGowan
- The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Translational, Clinical & Biosciences Research Institutes, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - D.J Jakovljevic
- The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Translational, Clinical & Biosciences Research Institutes, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Phadnis S, Sengupta S, Chakraborty A. Work From Home, Mental Health and Employee Needs: A pilot study in selected information technology organizations in India. APJHM 2021. [DOI: 10.24083/apjhm.v16i3.977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the economy and has resulted in changes to the working arrangements of employees who are based at home and may continue to work from home (WFH). Organizations are expected to develop an inclusive policy for their employees to promote mental health whilst working from home. The aim of this study was to document the impact of WFH on mental health and determine the expectations of employees from their organizations regarding occupational health policy.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on the impact of work from home on mental health and to document the mental health support needs of employees. Google form was floated through social media platform to receive the responses. A total of 74 responses were received. Descriptive analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel, while qualitative answers were manually analysed.
Results: About 67% employees (n=45) mentioned that their workload has increased significantly during work from home. Thirty five percent (n=26) felt lonely and lost and 47% (n= 34) felt disconnected from the real world, indicating the mental health impact of work from home. Fifty three percent employees (n=40) mentioned that there were no efforts made by their organization to reduce the mental health impact of work from home.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that there is an urgent need to create a comprehensive occupational health and safety policy inclusive of strategies to improve mental health by the organizations in light of “work from home” as a “new-normal”.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sarkar B, Shahid T, Indira G, Biswal S, Sengupta S, Biswas L, Goswami S, Pusarla C, de A, Ghosh T, Mukherjee M, Samanta A, Raj R, Bhattacharya J. PO-1123 Post mastectomy RT planning on institutional, RTOG & ESTRO contouring guidelines comparison. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)07574-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
15
|
Moitra S, Moitra S, Ghosh AK, Sengupta S, Das PK, Das A, Mitra R, Murgia N, Usmani OS. Reference values of impulse oscillometry (IOS) for healthy Indian adults. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2021; 24:536-539. [PMID: 32398207 DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.19.0796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Subhabrata Moitra
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain, CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERSP), Barcelona, Spain, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Saibal Moitra
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Charnock Hospital, Kolkata, India, Department of Pneumology, Allergy & Asthma Research Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - A K Ghosh
- Department of Statistics, Presidency University, Kolkata, India
| | - S Sengupta
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Charnock Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - P K Das
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Charnock Hospital, Kolkata, India, Department of Pneumology, Allergy & Asthma Research Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - A Das
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, India
| | - R Mitra
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - N Murgia
- Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - O S Usmani
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK, ,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mahammedi A, Ramos A, Bargalló N, Gaskill M, Kapur S, Saba L, Carrete H, Sengupta S, Salvador E, Hilario A, Revilla Y, Sanchez M, Perez-Nuñez M, Bachir S, Zhang B, Oleaga L, Sergio J, Koren L, Martin-Medina P, Wang L, Benegas M, Ostos F, Gonzalez-Ortega G, Calleja P, Udstuen G, Williamson B, Khandwala V, Chadalavada S, Woo D, Vagal A. Brain and Lung Imaging Correlation in Patients with COVID-19: Could the Severity of Lung Disease Reflect the Prevalence of Acute Abnormalities on Neuroimaging? A Global Multicenter Observational Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:1008-1016. [PMID: 33707278 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to study the association between abnormal findings on chest and brain imaging in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and neurologic symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective, international multicenter study, we reviewed the electronic medical records and imaging of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from March 3, 2020, to June 25, 2020. Our inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with acute neurologic manifestations and available chest CT and brain imaging. The 5 lobes of the lungs were individually scored on a scale of 0-5 (0 corresponded to no involvement and 5 corresponded to >75% involvement). A CT lung severity score was determined as the sum of lung involvement, ranging from 0 (no involvement) to 25 (maximum involvement). RESULTS A total of 135 patients met the inclusion criteria with 132 brain CT, 36 brain MR imaging, 7 MRA of the head and neck, and 135 chest CT studies. Compared with 86 (64%) patients without acute abnormal findings on neuroimaging, 49 (36%) patients with these findings had a significantly higher mean CT lung severity score (9.9 versus 5.8, P < .001). These patients were more likely to present with ischemic stroke (40 [82%] versus 11 [13%], P < .0001) and were more likely to have either ground-glass opacities or consolidation (46 [94%] versus 73 [84%], P = .01) in the lungs. A threshold of the CT lung severity score of >8 was found to be 74% sensitive and 65% specific for acute abnormal findings on neuroimaging. The neuroimaging hallmarks of these patients were acute ischemic infarct (28%), intracranial hemorrhage (10%) including microhemorrhages (19%), and leukoencephalopathy with and/or without restricted diffusion (11%). The predominant CT chest findings were peripheral ground-glass opacities with or without consolidation. CONCLUSIONS The CT lung disease severity score may be predictive of acute abnormalities on neuroimaging in patients with COVID-19 with neurologic manifestations. This can be used as a predictive tool in patient management to improve clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mahammedi
- From the Departments of Neuroradiology, (A.M., A.V., M.G., L.W., G.U., B.W., V.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - A Ramos
- Departments of Neuroradiology (A.R., E.S., A.H., L.K., P.M.-M.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - N Bargalló
- Neurology (S.S., D.W.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - M Gaskill
- Departments of Neuroradiology (L.O., N.B.), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Kapur
- Cardiopulmonary Imaging, (S.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - L Saba
- Department of Neuroradiology (L.S.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
| | - H Carrete
- Department of Neuroradiology (H.C.), Escola Paulista de Medicina, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - S Sengupta
- Neurology (S.S., D.W.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - E Salvador
- Departments of Neuroradiology (A.R., E.S., A.H., L.K., P.M.-M.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Hilario
- Departments of Neuroradiology (A.R., E.S., A.H., L.K., P.M.-M.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Y Revilla
- Cardiopulmonary Imaging (Y.R., M.P.-N.) Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Sanchez
- Department of Neuroradiology (L.S.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
| | - M Perez-Nuñez
- Cardiopulmonary Imaging (Y.R., M.P.-N.) Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - L Oleaga
- Departments of Neuroradiology (L.O., N.B.), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Sergio
- Department of Neuroradiology (L.S.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
| | - L Koren
- Departments of Neuroradiology (A.R., E.S., A.H., L.K., P.M.-M.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Martin-Medina
- Departments of Neuroradiology (A.R., E.S., A.H., L.K., P.M.-M.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Wang
- From the Departments of Neuroradiology, (A.M., A.V., M.G., L.W., G.U., B.W., V.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - M Benegas
- Department of Neuroradiology (L.S.), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
| | - F Ostos
- Neurology (F.O., G.G.-O., P.C.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Gonzalez-Ortega
- Neurology (F.O., G.G.-O., P.C.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Calleja
- Neurology (F.O., G.G.-O., P.C.), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Udstuen
- From the Departments of Neuroradiology, (A.M., A.V., M.G., L.W., G.U., B.W., V.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - B Williamson
- From the Departments of Neuroradiology, (A.M., A.V., M.G., L.W., G.U., B.W., V.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - V Khandwala
- From the Departments of Neuroradiology, (A.M., A.V., M.G., L.W., G.U., B.W., V.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - D Woo
- Neurology (S.S., D.W.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - A Vagal
- From the Departments of Neuroradiology, (A.M., A.V., M.G., L.W., G.U., B.W., V.K.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nandurkar R, Sluka P, Li M, Wardan H, Davis I, Sengupta S. Lytic Effects of Water on Bladder Cancer Cell Lines – Implications for Clinical Use of Water Irrigation to Reduce Recurrence. Urol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
18
|
Li M, Toniolo J, Nandurkar R, Papa N, Lawrentschuk N, Davis ID, Sengupta S. Continuous Bladder Irrigation after Transurethral Resection of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer for Prevention of Tumour Recurrence – A Systematic Review. Urol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Ho H, Ng M, Guerrieri M, Tan A, Bolton D, Chan Y, Lawrentschuk N, Cham C, McMillan K, Sengupta S, Koufogiannis G, Cokelek M, Spencer S, Liu M, Pham T, Lim Joon D, Foroudi F, Tacey M, Khor R, Ding W, Subramanian B, Chao M. Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes In Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
20
|
Niazi T, Williams S, Davis I, Stockler M, Martin A, Bracken K, Roncolato F, McJannett M, Horvath L, Sengupta S, Hughes S, McDermott R, Catto J, Kelly P, Vapiwala N, Parulekar W, Morgan S, Rendon R, Sweeney C. 694TiP DASL-HiCaP: Darolutamide augments standard therapy for localised very high-risk cancer of the prostate (ANZUP1801). A randomised phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adding darolutamide to androgen deprivation therapy and definitive or salvage radiation. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
21
|
Li M, Cheung K, Sengupta S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of negative predictive value of multi-parametric MRI as a pre-biopsy triage tool. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33743-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
22
|
Rosenthal VD, Bat-Erdene I, Gupta D, Belkebir S, Rajhans P, Zand F, Myatra SN, Afeef M, Tanzi VL, Muralidharan S, Gurskis V, Al-Abdely HM, El-Kholy A, AlKhawaja SAA, Sen S, Mehta Y, Rai V, Hung NV, Sayed AF, Guerrero-Toapanta FM, Elahi N, Morfin-Otero MDR, Somabutr S, De-Carvalho BM, Magdarao MS, Velinova VA, Quesada-Mora AM, Anguseva T, Ikram A, Aguilar-de-Moros D, Duszynska W, Mejia N, Horhat FG, Belskiy V, Mioljevic V, Di-Silvestre G, Furova K, Gamar-Elanbya MO, Gupta U, Abidi K, Raka L, Guo X, Luque-Torres MT, Jayatilleke K, Ben-Jaballah N, Gikas A, Sandoval-Castillo HR, Trotter A, Valderrama-Beltrán SL, Leblebicioglu H, Riera F, López M, Maurizi D, Desse J, Pérez I, Silva G, Chaparro G, Golschmid D, Cabrera R, Montanini A, Bianchi A, Vimercati J, Rodríguez-del-Valle M, Domínguez C, Saul P, Chediack V, Piastrelini M, Cardena L, Ramasco L, Olivieri M, Gallardo P, Juarez P, Brito M, Botta P, Alvarez G, Benchetrit G, Caridi M, Stagnaro J, Bourlot I, García M, Arregui N, Saeed N, Abdul-Aziz S, ALSayegh S, Humood M, Mohamed-Ali K, Swar S, Magray T, Aguiar-Portela T, Sugette-de-Aguiar T, Serpa-Maia F, Fernandes-Alves-de-Lima L, Teixeira-Josino L, Sampaio-Bezerra M, Furtado-Maia R, Romário-Mendes A, Alves-De-Oliveira A, Vasconcelos-Carneiro A, Anjos-Lima JD, Pinto-Coelho K, Maciel-Canuto M, Rocha-Batista M, Moreira T, Rodrigues-Amarilo N, Lima-de-Barros T, Guimarães KA, Batista C, Santos C, de-Lima-Silva F, Santos-Mota E, Karla L, Ferreira-de-Souza M, Luzia N, de-Oliveira S, Takeda C, Azevedo-Ferreira-Lima D, Faheina J, Coelho-Oliveira L, do-Nascimento S, Machado-Silva V, Bento-Ferreira, Olszewski J, Tenorio M, Silva-Lemos A, Ramos-Feijó C, Cardoso D, Correa-Barbosa M, Assunção-Ponte G, Faheina J, da-Silva-Escudero D, Servolo-Medeiros E, Andrade-Oliveira-Reis M, Kostadinov E, Dicheva V, Petrov M, Guo C, Yu H, Liu T, Song G, Wang C, Cañas-Giraldo L, Marin-Tobar D, Trujillo-Ramirez E, Andrea-Rios P, Álvarez-Moreno C, Linares C, González-Rubio P, Ariza-Ayala B, Gamba-Moreno L, Gualtero-Trujill S, Segura-Sarmiento S, Rodriguez-Pena J, Ortega R, Olarte N, Pardo-Lopez Y, Luis Marino Otela-Baicue A, Vargas-Garcia A, Roncancio E, Gomez-Nieto K, Espinosa-Valencia M, Barahona-Guzman N, Avila-Acosta C, Raigoza-Martinez W, Villamil-Gomez W, Chapeta-Parada E, Mindiola-Rochel A, Corchuelo-Martinez A, Martinez A, Lagares-Guzman A, Rodriguez-Ferrer M, Yepes-Gomez D, Muñoz-Gutierrez G, Arguello-Ruiz A, Zuniga-Chavarria M, Maroto-Vargas L, Valverde-Hernández M, Solano-Chinchilla A, Calvo-Hernandez I, Chavarria-Ugalde O, Tolari G, Rojas-Fermin R, Diaz-Rodriguez C, Huascar S, Ortiz M, Bovera M, Alquinga N, Santacruz G, Jara E, Delgado V, Salgado-Yepez E, Valencia F, Pelaez C, Gonzalez-Flores H, Coello-Gordon E, Picoita F, Arboleda M, Garcia M, Velez J, Valle M, Unigarro L, Figueroa V, Marin K, Caballero-Narvaez H, Bayani V, Ahmed S, Alansary A, Hassan A, Abdel-Halim M, El-Fattah M, Abdelaziz-Yousef R, Hala A, Abdelhady K, Ahmed-Fouad H, Mounir-Agha H, Hamza H, Salah Z, Abdel-Aziz D, Ibrahim S, Helal A, AbdelMassih A, Mahmoud AR, Elawady B, El-sherif R, Fattah-Radwan Y, Abdel-Mawla T, Kamal-Elden N, Kartsonaki M, Rivera D, Mandal S, Mukherjee S, Navaneet P, Padmini B, Sorabjee J, Sakle A, Potdar M, Mane D, Sale H, Abdul-Gaffar M, Kazi M, Chabukswar S, Anju M, Gaikwad D, Harshe A, Blessymole S, Nair P, Khanna D, Chacko F, Rajalakshmi A, Mubarak A, Kharbanda M, Kumar S, Mathur P, Saranya S, Abubakar F, Sampat S, Raut V, Biswas S, Kelkar R, Divatia J, Chakravarthy M, Gokul B, Sukanya R, Pushparaj L, Thejasvini A, Rangaswamy S, Saini N, Bhattacharya C, Das S, Sanyal S, Chaudhury B, Rodrigues C, Khanna G, Dwivedy A, Binu S, Shetty S, Eappen J, Valsa T, Sriram A, Todi S, Bhattacharyya M, Bhakta A, Ramachandran B, Krupanandan R, Sahoo P, Mohanty N, Sahu S, Misra S, Ray B, Pattnaik S, Pillai H, Warrier A, Ranganathan L, Mani A, Rajagopal S, Abraham B, Venkatraman R, Ramakrishnan N, Devaprasad D, Siva K, Divekar D, Satish Kavathekar M, Suryawanshi M, Poojary A, Sheeba J, Patil P, Kukreja S, Varma K, Narayanan S, Sohanlal T, Agarwal A, Agarwal M, Nadimpalli G, Bhamare S, Thorat S, Sarda O, Nadimpalli P, Nirkhiwale S, Gehlot G, Bhattacharya S, Pandya N, Raphel A, Zala D, Mishra S, Patel M, Aggarwal D, Jawadwal B, Pawar N, Kardekar S, Manked A, Tamboli A, Manked A, Khety Z, Singhal T, Shah S, Kothari V, Naik R, Narain R, Sengupta S, Karmakar A, Mishra S, Pati B, Kantroo V, Kansal S, Modi N, Chawla R, Chawla A, Roy I, Mukherjee S, Bej M, Mukherjee P, Baidya S, Durell A, Vadi S, Saseedharan S, Anant P, Edwin J, Sen N, Sandhu K, Pandya N, Sharma S, Sengupta S, Palaniswamy V, Sharma P, Selvaraj M, Saurabh L, Agarwal M, Punia D, Soni D, Misra R, Harsvardhan R, Azim A, Kambam C, Garg A, Ekta S, Lakhe M, Sharma C, Singh G, Kaur A, Singhal S, Chhabra K, Ramakrishnan G, Kamboj H, Pillai S, Rani P, Singla D, Sanaei A, Maghsudi B, Sabetian G, Masjedi M, Shafiee E, Nikandish R, Paydar S, Khalili H, Moradi A, Sadeghi P, Bolandparvaz S, Mubarak S, Makhlouf M, Awwad M, Ayyad O, Shaweesh A, Khader M, Alghazawi A, Hussien N, Alruzzieh M, Mohamed Y, ALazhary M, Abdul Aziz O, Alazmi M, Mendoza J, De Vera P, Rillorta A, de Guzman M, Girvan M, Torres M, Alzahrani N, Alfaraj S, Gopal U, Manuel M, Alshehri R, Lessing L, Alzoman H, Abdrahiem J, Adballah H, Thankachan J, Gomaa H, Asad T, AL-Alawi M, Al-Abdullah N, Demaisip N, Laungayan-Cortez E, Cabato A, Gonzales J, Al Raey M, Al-Darani S, Aziz M, Al-Manea B, Samy E, AlDalaton M, Alaliany M, Alabdely H, Helali N, Sindayen G, Malificio A, Al-Dossari H, Kelany A, Algethami A, Mohamed D, Yanne L, Tan A, Babu S, Abduljabbar S, Al-Zaydani M, Ahmed H, Al Jarie A, Al-Qathani A, Al-Alkami H, AlDalaton M, Alih S, Alaliany M, Gasmin-Aromin R, Balon-Ubalde E, Diab H, Kader N, Hassan-Assiry I, Kelany A, Albeladi E, Aboushoushah S, Qushmaq N, Fernandez J, Hussain W, Rajavel R, Bukhari S, Rushdi H, Turkistani A, Mushtaq J, Bohlega E, Simon S, Damlig E, Elsherbini S, Abraham S, Kaid E, Al-Attas A, Hawsawi G, Hussein B, Esam B, Caminade Y, Santos A, Abdulwahab M, Aldossary A, Al-Suliman S, AlTalib A, Albaghly N, HaqlreMia M, Kaid E, Altowerqi R, Ghalilah K, Alradady M, Al-Qatri A, Chaouali M, Shyrine E, Philipose J, Raees M, AbdulKhalik N, Madco M, Acostan C, Safwat R, Halwani M, Abdul-Aal N, Thomas A, Abdulatif S, Ali-Karrar M, Al-Gosn N, Al-Hindi A, Jaha R, AlQahtani S, Ayugat E, Al-Hussain M, Aldossary A, Al-Suliman S, Al-Talib A, Albaghly N, Haqlre-Mia M, Briones S, Krishnan R, Tabassum K, Alharbi L, Madani A, Al-Hindi A, Al-Gethamy M, Alamri D, Spahija G, Gashi A, Kurian A, George S, Mohamed A, Ramapurath R, Varghese S, Abdo N, Foda-Salama M, Al-Mousa H, Omar A, Salama M, Toleb M, Khamis S, Kanj S, Zahreddine N, Kanafani Z, Kardas T, Ahmadieh R, Hammoud Z, Zeid I, Al-Souheil A, Ayash H, Mahfouz T, Kondratas T, Grinkeviciute D, Kevalas R, Dagys A, Mitrev Z, Bogoevska-Miteva Z, Jankovska K, Guroska S, Petrovska M, Popovska K, Ng C, Hoon Y, Hasan YM, Othman-Jailani M, Hadi-Jamaluddin M, Othman A, Zainol H, Wan-Yusoff W, Gan C, Lum L, Ling C, Aziz F, Zhazali R, Abud-Wahab M, Cheng T, Elghuwael I, Wan-Mat W, Abd-Rahman R, Perez-Gomez H, Kasten-Monges M, Esparza-Ahumada S, Rodriguez-Noriega E, Gonzalez-Diaz E, Mayoral-Pardo D, Cerero-Gudino A, Altuzar-Figueroa M, Perez-Cruz J, Escobar-Vazquez M, Aragon D, Coronado-Magana H, Mijangos-Mendez J, Corona-Jimenez F, Aguirre-Avalos G, Lopez-Mateos A, Martinez-Marroquin M, Montell-Garcia M, Martinez-Martinez A, Leon-Sanchez E, Gomez-Flores G, Ramirez M, Gomez M, Lozano M, Mercado V, Zamudio-Lugo I, Gomez-Gonzalez C, Miranda-Novales M, Villegas-Mota I, Reyes-Garcia C, Ramirez-Morales M, Sanchez-Rivas M, Cureno-Diaz M, Matias-Tellez B, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Juarez-Vargas R, Pastor-Salinas O, Gutierrez-Munoz V, Conde-Mercado J, Bruno-Carrasco G, Manrique M, Monroy-Colin V, Cruz-Rivera Z, Rodriguez-Pacheco J, Cruz N, Hernandez-Chena B, Guido-Ramirez O, Arteaga-Troncoso G, Guerra-Infante F, Lopez-Hurtado M, Caleco JD, Leyva-Medellin E, Salamanca-Meneses A, Cosio-Moran C, Ruiz-Rendon R, Aguilar-Angel L, Sanchez-Vargas M, Mares-Morales R, Fernandez-Alvarez L, Castillo-Cruz B, Gonzalez-Ma M, Zavala-Ramír M, Rivera-Reyna L, del-Moral-Rossete L, Lopez-Rubio C, Valadez-de-Alba M, Bat-Erdene A, Chuluunchimeg K, Baatar O, Batkhuu B, Ariyasuren Z, Bayasgalan G, Baigalmaa S, Uyanga T, Suvderdene P, Enkhtsetseg D, Suvd-Erdene D, Chimedtseye E, Bilguun G, Tuvshinbayar M, Dorj M, Khajidmaa T, Batjargal G, Naranpurev M, Bat-Erdene A, Bolormaa T, Battsetseg T, Batsuren C, Batsaikhan N, Tsolmon B, Saranbaatar A, Natsagnyam P, Nyamdawa O, Madani N, Abouqal R, Zeggwagh A, Berechid K, Dendane T, Koirala A, Giri R, Sainju S, Acharya S, Paul N, Parveen A, Raza A, Nizamuddin S, Sultan F, Imran X, Sajjad R, Khan M, Sana F, Tayyab N, Ahmed A, Zaman G, Khan I, Khurram F, Hussain A, Zahra F, Imtiaz A, Daud N, Sarwar M, Roop Z, Yusuf S, Hanif F, Shumaila X, Zeb J, Ali S, Demas S, Ariff S, Riaz A, Hussain A, Kanaan A, Jeetawi R, Castaño E, Moreno-Castillo L, García-Mayorca E, Prudencio-Leon W, Vivas-Pardo A, Changano-Rodriguez M, Castillo-Bravo L, Aibar-Yaranga K, Marquez-Mondalgo V, Mueras-Quevedo J, Meza-Borja C, Flor J, Fernandez-Camacho Y, Banda-Flores C, Pichilingue-Chagray J, Castaneda-Sabogal A, Caoili J, Mariano M, Maglente R, Santos S, de-Guzman G, Mendoza M, Javellana O, Tajanlangit A, Tapang A, Sg-Buenaflor M, Labro E, Carma R, Dy A, Fortin J, Navoa-Ng J, Cesar J, Bonifacio B, Llames M, Gata H, Tamayo A, Calupit H, Catcho V, Bergosa L, Abuy M, Barteczko-Grajek B, Rojek S, Szczesny A, Domanska M, Lipinska G, Jaroslaw J, Wieczoreka A, Szczykutowicza A, Gawor M, Piwoda M, Rydz-Lutrzykowska J, Grudzinska M, Kolat-Brodecka P, Smiechowicz K, Tamowicz B, Mikstacki A, Grams A, Sobczynski P, Nowicka M, Kretov V, Shalapuda V, Molkov A, Puzanov S, Utkin I, Tchekulaev A, Tulupova V, Vasiljevic S, Nikolic L, Ristic G, Eremija J, Kojovic J, Lekic D, Simic A, Hlinkova S, Lesnakova A, Kadankunnel S, Abdo-Ali M, Pimathai R, Wanitanukool S, Supa N, Prasan P, Luxsuwong M, Khuenkaew Y, Lamngamsupha J, Siriyakorn N, Prasanthai V, Apisarnthanarak A, Borgi A, Bouziri A, Cabadak H, Tuncer G, Bulut C, Hatipoglu C, Sebnem F, Demiroz A, Kaya A, Ersoz G, Kuyucu N, Karacorlu S, Oncul O, Gorenek L, Erdem H, Yildizdas D, Horoz O, Guclu E, Kaya G, Karabay O, Altindis M, Oztoprak N, Sahip Y, Uzun C, Erben N, Usluer G, Ozgunes I, Ozcelik M, Ceyda B, Oral M, Unal N, Cigdem Y, Bayar M, Bermede O, Saygili S, Yesiler I, Memikoglu O, Tekin R, Oncul A, Gunduz A, Ozdemir D, Geyik M, Erdogan S, Aygun C, Dilek A, Esen S, Turgut H, Sungurtekin H, Ugurcan D, Yarar V, Bilir Y, Bayram N, Devrim I, Agin H, Ceylan G, Yasar N, Oruc Y, Ramazanoglu A, Turhan O, Cengiz M, Yalcin A, Dursun O, Gunasan P, Kaya S, Senol G, Kocagoz A, Al-Rahma H, Annamma P, El-Houfi A, Vidal H, Perez F, D-Empaire G, Ruiz Y, Hernandez D, Aponte D, Salinas E, Vidal H, Navarrete N, Vargas R, Sanchez E, Ngo Quy C, Thu T, Nguyet L, Hang P, Hang T, Hanh T, Anh D. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 45 countries for 2012-2017: Device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2020; 48:423-432. [PMID: 31676155 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the results of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) surveillance study from January 2012 to December 2017 in 523 intensive care units (ICUs) in 45 countries from Latin America, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, and Western Pacific. METHODS During the 6-year study period, prospective data from 532,483 ICU patients hospitalized in 242 hospitals, for an aggregate of 2,197,304 patient days, were collected through the INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) definitions for device-associated health care-associated infection (DA-HAI) were applied. RESULTS Although device use in INICC ICUs was similar to that reported from CDC-NHSN ICUs, DA-HAI rates were higher in the INICC ICUs: in the medical-surgical ICUs, the pooled central line-associated bloodstream infection rate was higher (5.05 vs 0.8 per 1,000 central line-days); the ventilator-associated pneumonia rate was also higher (14.1 vs 0.9 per 1,000 ventilator-days,), as well as the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (5.1 vs 1.7 per 1,000 catheter-days). From blood cultures samples, frequencies of resistance, such as of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to piperacillin-tazobactam (33.0% vs 18.3%), were also higher. CONCLUSIONS Despite a significant trend toward the reduction in INICC ICUs, DA-HAI rates are still much higher compared with CDC-NHSN's ICUs representing the developed world. It is INICC's main goal to provide basic and cost-effective resources, through the INICC Surveillance Online System to tackle the burden of DA-HAIs effectively.
Collapse
|
23
|
Jootun N, Sengupta S, Cunningham C, Charlton P, Betts M, Weaver A, Jacobs C, Hompes R, Muirhead R. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer - less is more? Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:261-268. [PMID: 31556218 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is significant international variation in the use of neoadjuvant radiation prior to total mesorectal excision. The MERCURY group advocate selective neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We have performed a retrospective, single-centre study of patients treated with CRT, where only the circumferential resection margin is threatened, with the aim of identifying whether a more selective approach to CRT provides acceptable local relapse rates (LRRs). METHOD All consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma over a 5-year period (2007-2012) in the Oxford University Trust were considered. Electronic hospital systems were reviewed to obtain patient and tumour demographics, treatment and follow-up information. All patients were classified into risk categories according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and R. RESULTS Two hundred and seventy-two patients were identified: 123, 89 and 60 in the high-, intermediate- and low-risk categories, respectively. Seventy-nine per cent of those in the high-risk group, 6% in the intermediate and 5% in the low-risk group underwent CRT. The overall 5-year LRR and distant recurrence rate (DRR) were 5.2% and 17.8%, respectively. The 5-year LRR for those who went straight to surgery was 2.0% and for those who had neoadjuvant CRT it was 7.4%. The DRR for these two groups was 8.5% and 18.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our series demonstrates that the use of CRT only in margin-threatening tumours, results in an exceptionally low LRR for those without margin-threatening disease. In routine clinical care, this strategy can minimize the significant morbidity of multimodal treatment and allow earlier introduction of systemic therapy to minimize distant recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Jootun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Sengupta
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Cunningham
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - P Charlton
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Betts
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - A Weaver
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nuffield Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Muirhead
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Parihar V, Sopena-Falco J, Leung E, Benz E, Cooney A, Keohane J, Sengupta S. R0 Resection Margin, A New Quality Measure in the Era of National Bowel Screening? Ir Med J 2020; 113:7. [PMID: 32298567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Aims To determine the completeness of polyp resection (i.e. achieving an R0 margin) and its relation with Endoscopists, histopathologist, size, location and technique of polypectomy in an NSS cohort. The definition of R0 margin is complete macroscopic resection with a negative microscopic margin at polypectomy. Method NCCS (National Colon Cancer Screening) colonoscopies are offered to bowel cancer screening patients after a positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT) test in a Joint Advisory Group (JAG) accredited Gastrointestinal Endoscopy centre. We histologically evaluated the polyp margins for complete resection, which was defined as the absence of adenomatous or hyperplastic tissue in the resected polyp margins in a cohort of faecal immunochemical test positive patients. Results A total of 186 consecutive NCCS colonoscopies out of a total of 542 performed between 2013 and 2017 were included in this study. Of the polyps excised 152(27%) had a R0 margin histologically, and 30(5%) had involvement of the margin. Surprisingly in 373(67%) of polyps pathologists were unable to assess the margin. Conclusion Achieving an R0 margin should be a key performance indicator for endoscopists performing polypectomy. At the same time more studies on polyp margins are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Parihar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - J Sopena-Falco
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - E Leung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - E Benz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - A Cooney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - J Keohane
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Haldar A, Sengupta S, Das D, Sarkar S, Sett S. Role of interactome development in evaluation of refractory epilepsy: A case report. J Neurol Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.10.1821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
27
|
Jiang J, Bradford G, Hossain SI, Brown M, Cooper J, Miller E, Huang Y, Miao H, Parrell JA, White M, Hunt A, Sengupta S, Revur R, Shen T, Kametani F, Trociewitz UP, Hellstrom EE, Larbalestier DC. High Performance Bi-2212 Round Wires Made with Recent Powders. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 2019; 29:6400405. [PMID: 33737796 PMCID: PMC7968414 DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2019.2895197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Multifilamentary Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox (Bi-2212) wire made by the powder-in-tube technique is the only high temperature superconductor made in the round shape preferred by magnet builders. The critical current density (J C ) of Bi-2212 round wire was improved significantly by the development of overpressure heat treatment in the past few years. Bi-2212 wire is commercially available in multiple architectures and kilometer-long pieces and a very promising conductor for very high field NMR and accelerator magnets. We studied the effects of precursor powder and heat treatment conditions on the superconducting properties and microstructure of recent Bi-2212 wires. Short samples of recent wire with optimized overpressure processing showed J C (4.2 K, 15 T) = 6640 A/mm2 and J C (4.2 K, 30 T) = 4670 A/mm2, which correspond to engineering critical current densities J E (4.2 K, 15 T) = 1320 A/mm2 and J E (4.2 K, 30 T) = 930 A/mm2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jiang
- Applied Superconductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - G Bradford
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - S I Hossain
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - M Brown
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - J Cooper
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - E Miller
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - Y Huang
- Bruker OST, Carteret, NJ 07008, USA
| | - H Miao
- Bruker OST, Carteret, NJ 07008, USA
| | | | - M White
- nGimat LLC, 2436 Over Dr. Lexington, KY 40511, USA
| | - A Hunt
- nGimat LLC, 2436 Over Dr. Lexington, KY 40511, USA
| | - S Sengupta
- MetaMateria, 870 Kaderly Dr, Columbus, OH 43228, USA
| | - R Revur
- MetaMateria, 870 Kaderly Dr, Columbus, OH 43228, USA
| | - T Shen
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA
| | - F Kametani
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - U P Trociewitz
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - E E Hellstrom
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| | - D C Larbalestier
- Applied Super-conductivity Center, National High Magnetic Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA and also with Florida State University
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Löhner A, Kunsel T, Röhr MIS, Jansen TLC, Sengupta S, Würthner F, Knoester J, Köhler J. Spectral and Structural Variations of Biomimetic Light-Harvesting Nanotubes. J Phys Chem Lett 2019; 10:2715-2724. [PMID: 31059268 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Bioinspired, self-assembled nanotubes have been investigated by low-temperature, polarization-resolved single-tube spectroscopy. These assemblies are based on zinc chlorin monomers and are considered as model systems that resemble the secondary structural elements in the natural light-harvesting systems of green (non)sulfur bacteria. Compared to the natural systems, the spectral parameters extracted from the single-nanotube spectra feature distributions with significantly smaller widths, which is ascribed to a tremendous reduction of structural heterogeneity in the artificial systems. Employing quantum chemical molecular modeling the spectra of individual nanotubes can be explained consistently only for a molecular packing model that is fundamentally different from those considered so far for the natural systems. Subsequent theoretical simulations reveal that the remaining spectral variations between single nanotubes can be traced back to small variations of the mutual orientations of the monomer transition dipole moments that are far beyond the resolving power of high-resolution electron microscopy imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Löhner
- Spectroscopy of Soft Matter , University of Bayreuth , Universitätsstraße 30 , 94557 Bayreuth , Germany
| | - T Kunsel
- University of Groningen , Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands
| | - M I S Röhr
- Center for Nanosystems Chemistry , Universität Würzburg , Theodor-Boveri-Weg , 97074 Würzburg , Germany
| | - T L C Jansen
- University of Groningen , Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands
| | - S Sengupta
- Center for Nanosystems Chemistry , Universität Würzburg , Theodor-Boveri-Weg , 97074 Würzburg , Germany
| | - F Würthner
- Center for Nanosystems Chemistry , Universität Würzburg , Theodor-Boveri-Weg , 97074 Würzburg , Germany
- Bavarian Polymer Institute , Theodor-Boveri-Weg , 97074 Würzburg , Germany
| | - J Knoester
- University of Groningen , Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials , Nijenborgh 4 , 9747 AG Groningen , The Netherlands
| | - J Köhler
- Spectroscopy of Soft Matter , University of Bayreuth , Universitätsstraße 30 , 94557 Bayreuth , Germany
- Bavarian Polymer Institute , Universitätsstraße 30 , 94557 Bayreuth , Germany
- Bayreuth Institute of Macromolecular Research (BIMF) , University of Bayreuth , Universitätsstraße 30 , 94557 Bayreuth , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Singh SK, Sengupta S, Antony R, Bhattacharya S, Mukhopadhyay C, Ramasubramanian V, Sharma A, Sahu S, Nirkhiwale S, Gupta S, Rohit A, Sharma S, Raghavan V, Barman P, Sood S, Mamtora D, Rengaswamy S, Arora A, Goossens H, Versporten A. Variations in antibiotic use across India: multi-centre study through Global Point Prevalence survey. J Hosp Infect 2019; 103:280-283. [PMID: 31170422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess antimicrobial prescribing patterns, and variation in practice, in India. A point prevalence survey (PPS) was conducted in October to December 2017 in 16 tertiary care hospitals across India. The survey included all inpatients receiving an antimicrobial on the day of PPS and collected data were analysed using a web-based application of the University of Antwerp. In all, 1750 patients were surveyed, of whom 1005 were receiving a total of 1578 antimicrobials. Among the antimicrobials prescribed, 26.87% were for community-acquired infections; 19.20% for hospital-acquired infections; 17.24% for medical prophylaxis; 28.70% for surgical prophylaxis; and 7.99% for other or undetermined reasons. Antibiotic prescribing quality indicators, such as reason in notes and post-prescription review score, were low. This PPS showed widespread antibiotic usage, underlining the need for antibiotic stewardship to promote evidence-based practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Singh
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India.
| | - S Sengupta
- Medanta - The Medicity Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - R Antony
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, India
| | | | | | | | | | - S Sahu
- Apollo Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India
| | | | - S Gupta
- Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | - A Rohit
- Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - S Sharma
- Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Delhi, India
| | - V Raghavan
- Sundaram Medical Foundation, Chennai, India
| | - P Barman
- BLK Super Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - S Sood
- CK Birla Hospitals - Rukmani Birla Hospital, Jaipur, India
| | | | | | - A Arora
- Fortis Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sengupta S, Handoo A. Optimizing the impact of POCT: Eliminating errors before they hit you!! Clin Chim Acta 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.1389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
31
|
Sengupta S, Handoo A. Pre-analytical errors in the clinical laboratory: A risk assessment analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.1058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
32
|
Sevigny CM, Sengupta S, Luo Z, Jin L, Pearce D, Clarke R. Abstract P2-06-14: The role of SLC7A5 (LAT1) in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-06-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Endocrine therapies are commonly used to treat estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers, which comprise 70% of all new breast cancer cases. Unfortunately, emergence of resistance to these therapies presents a major clinical challenge. Cancer cells can adapt to the dysregulation of cellular metabolism induced by endocrine therapy in order to evade cell death.Central to this adaptation is the scavenging of free-formed amino acids from the tumor microenvironment. For example, we found 109 solute carrier (SLC) mRNAs to be differentially expressed between endocrine-sensitive and resistant cells. We began our mechanistic studies of these genes with SLC family 7 member 5 (SLC7A5 or LAT1). SLC7A5 is a key component of a transmembrane transporter, which can complex with CD98 and increase the uptake of large, neutral amino acids (such as leucine or tyrosine).
We used a panel of endocrine therapy-resistant (LCC9) and sensitive (MCF7; LCC1) breast cancer cells. SLC7A5 expression was upregulated by estrogen in MCF7 and LCC1 cells; this induction was blocked by fulvestrant treatment. Basal expression of the SLC7A5 protein in the absence of estrogen was 2.75-fold higher in LCC9 cells compared with MCF7 cells; SLC7A5 mRNA expression was 71-fold higher. Fulvestrant treatment did not significantly alter SLC7A5 mRNA or protein expression in LCC9 cells. Inhibiting SLC7A5 function using either a pharmacological inhibitor (JPH203), or depleting expression using siRNA, led to significant suppression of LCC9 cell growth. Cell cycle analysis revealed that SLC7A5 depletion caused cells to accumulate in the G1-phase, with a concurrent reduction of cells in S-phase. In four publicly available datasets of ER+, tamoxifen treated breast cancer patients, high expression of SLC7A5 was significantly associated with poor relapse-free survival.
This study uncovers a novel adaptive mechanism in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer cells that is facilitated by increased expression of SLC7A5, which enables them to supplement their increased metabolic needs and promoting cell growth. Blocking the functions of SLC7A5, perhaps in conjunction with inhibition of autophagy, may therefore offer a new avenue of potential therapeutic intervention against endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancers.
Citation Format: Sevigny CM, Sengupta S, Luo Z, Jin L, Pearce D, Clarke R. The role of SLC7A5 (LAT1) in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-06-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CM Sevigny
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - S Sengupta
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Z Luo
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - L Jin
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D Pearce
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - R Clarke
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Clarke R, Dixon M, Jin L, Pearce D, Turnbull A, Selli C, Hu R, Zwart A, Wang Y, Xuan J, Sengupta S, Sims A, Liu MC. Abstract P5-04-17: Local network topology differences between early and late recurrence in ER+ breast cancers. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-04-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Late recurrence is characteristic of ER+ breast cancers. Despite an apparently effective adjuvant endocrine therapy, many breast cancers recur years after their initial endocrine treatment. Why some tumors recur early (<3 years) and some recur later (>5 years) is poorly understood. If systemic endocrine therapies killed all cells, recurrence would reflect only the appearance of new disease. Thus, we hypothesized that cells that survive and lie dormant may be driven, in part, by altered wiring of their cell death signaling. We, therefore, studied how cell death signaling is differentially wired in primary tumors that will recur early versus those that will recur later.
Method: Genes involved in apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, necrosis, and pyroptosis were identified from KEGG to initiate network feature analysis of gene expression data from public and our first in-house gene expression dataset. Data were collected from ER+ breast cancer pre-endocrine treatment samples with up to 20 years follow-up. Publicly available datasets used were GSE6532, GSE2034, GSE7390, GSE17705, GSE12093, and TCGA. We applied our Knowledge-fused Differential Dependency Network (KDDN) analysis tool to the public datasets; KDDN has provided powerful new insights into signaling in breast and other cancers. Common gene-gene interactions (edges) predicted in at least two different datasets were extracted from all KDDN analyses results. To strengthen the relevance of these features, predicted network edges that represent known protein-protein interactions (PPI) were identified from the STRING database, and these edges were noted in the signaling graphs. Final network graphs were constructed using the common edges from all overlaid networks. We conducted IPA analysis on all nodes in the final network and selected those incorporating network hubs. We took a similar approach to our second in-house dataset, which we used for independent testing. Here, patients were included if their tumor exhibited an initial reduction in volume of at least 40% by four months in response to neo-adjuvant Letrozole. Patients were then classified into two groups during follow-up of up to 3.7 years: i) initial tumor size reduction followed by continued response (expected to recur late); ii) initial reduction followed by tumor regrowth (expected to recur early). KDDN analysis was performed on pretreatment samples from these two groups and a network created annotated with PPI information.
Results: MAPK8 and CYCS (Molecular Mechanisms of Cancer, p=1.58E-52), TNFRSF1A Neuroinflammation Signaling Pathway, p=1.26E-54), RELA, and NFKB1 (Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Signaling, p=7.94E-35), were identified as hubs. Hubs may be critical signaling components driving the differences between tumors that will become dormant and recur late. Connections between SLC25A6 and SQSTM1 (p = 0.008), BIRC2 and GABARAP (p = 0.021) in the early group, and AKT3 and IRS2 (p = 0.014) in the late group, were shared between the two final networks. With longer follow-up time on the second in-house dataset, we will better define the two groups and identify additional common phenotype specific gene-gene interactions.
Citation Format: Clarke R, Dixon M, Jin L, Pearce D, Turnbull A, Selli C, Hu R, Zwart A, Wang Y, Xuan J, Sengupta S, Sims A, Liu MC. Local network topology differences between early and late recurrence in ER+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Clarke
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - M Dixon
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L Jin
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D Pearce
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Turnbull
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C Selli
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - R Hu
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Zwart
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Y Wang
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J Xuan
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S Sengupta
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Sims
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - MC Liu
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Breast Cancer Now Research Labs, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech Research Center, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sengupta S. Admissible unbiased estimation of finite population variance under a randomized response model. COMMUN STAT-THEOR M 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1386311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Sengupta
- Department of Statistics, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pramanik A, Datta AK, Das D, Kumbhakar DV, Ghosh B, Mandal A, Gupta S, Saha A, Sengupta S. Assessment of Nanotoxicity (Cadmium Sulphide and Copper Oxide) Using Cytogenetical Parameters in Coriandrum sativum L. (Apiaceae). CYTOL GENET+ 2018. [DOI: 10.3103/s0095452718040084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
36
|
Ghosh S, Ghosh S, Sinha M, Sadhasivam S, Bhattacharyya A, Samanta R, Nandy A, Saini S, Mishra M, Sengupta S. 1108 Preclinical evaluation of a novel fluoroquinolone for its multi-dimensional therapeutic effects against drug-resistant Propionibacterium acnes induced acne. J Invest Dermatol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.03.1121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
37
|
Lalani N, Paszat L, Sutradhar R, Gu S, Fong C, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, Tuck A, Youngson B, Miller N, Done SJ, Chang MC, Sengupta S, Elavathil L, Jani PA, Bonin M, Rakovitch E. Abstract P4-15-05: The presence of one or multiple foci of microinvasion is not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast conserving therapy. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-15-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast cancer often treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiotherapy (RT). It is unclear if the presence of microinvasion (MI) (invasion ≤1mm) is associated with an increased risk of LR (DCIS or invasive) or invasive LR compared to women with pure DCIS. In addition, the impact of multiple foci (>2) of MI compared to pure DCIS is also unknown; therefore, it is unclear if some women with MI require more aggressive treatment. We evaluated the impact of the presence of MI and the number of foci of MI on the risks of any LR and invasive LR in a population of women with DCIS with and without MI treated with BCS.
Methods: The cohort includes all women diagnosed with pure DCIS or DCIS with MI in Ontario from 1994-2003 treated with BCS +/- RT. All cases had systematic pathology review to confirm the presence and number of foci of MI. Treatment and outcomes were ascertained through administrative databases and validated by chart review. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of MI and the number of foci of MI (1 vs >2 foci) on the development of any LR and invasive LR compared to cases with pure DCIS. The 10-yr local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and invasive LRFS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier approach with differences compared using the log-rank test.
Results: The population cohort includes 2,988 women with DCIS treated by BCS (N=2,721 pure DCIS, N= 267 DCIS with MI). Median follow-up (12 years; p=.23) and median age at diagnosis (58 years; p=.17) were similar in both groups. RT was given in 58% of cases with MI and 51% of cases with pure DCIS (p=.03). Hormonal therapy was utilized in 7.1% of women with MI and 5.3% of women with pure DCIS (p=.22). LR developed in 59 (22.1%) cases with MI and 530 (19.6%) cases of pure DCIS. Women with MI were more likely to have high nuclear grade (p<.001), and larger tumor size (p<.001) compared to those without MI. On multivariable analyses adjusted for age, the presence of 1 focus of MI(HR=.92, 95% CI: .64-1.33) or ≥2 foci of MI (HR=1.26, 95% CI: .85-1.85) was not associated with an increased risk of any LR compared to cases with pure DCIS. Factors associated with any LR were age <50 years at diagnosis, RT, multifocality and high nuclear grade. The presence of 1 focus of MI (HR=.86, 95% CI: .52-1.40) or > 2 foci of MI (HR=1.45, 95% CI: .90-2.32) was also not associated with an increased risk of invasive LR compared to cases of pure DCIS. Among women treated with BCS alone, the 10 year LRFS rates were 80%, 75% and 73% for women with pure DCIS, 1 focus, >2 foci of MI (p=.10). The invasive LRFS rates were 89%, 91% and 85% (p=.26). Among women treated with BCS+RT, the 10 year LRFS rates were 87%, 88% and 80% (p=0.32) for women with pure DCIS, 1 focus or ≥2 foci of MI. The invasive LRFS rates were 93%, 90% and 86% (p=.44). There was no interaction between the presence of MI and RT.
Conclusions: Women with DCIS with one or multiple foci of microinvasion (<1mm) treated by breast conserving therapy do not have an increased risk of LR or invasive LR compared to women with pure DCIS.
Citation Format: Lalani N, Paszat L, Sutradhar R, Gu S, Fong C, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, Tuck A, Youngson B, Miller N, Done SJ, Chang MC, Sengupta S, Elavathil L, Jani PA, Bonin M, Rakovitch E. The presence of one or multiple foci of microinvasion is not associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast conserving therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Lalani
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Paszat
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Sutradhar
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Gu
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Fong
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Nofech-Mozes
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Hanna
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Tuck
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B Youngson
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - N Miller
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - SJ Done
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - MC Chang
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Sengupta
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L Elavathil
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - PA Jani
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Bonin
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Rakovitch
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada; Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Clarke R, Dixon MJ, Jin L, Turnbull A, Hu R, Zwart A, Wang Y, Xuan J, Sengupta S, Renshaw L, Sims A, Liu MC. Abstract P4-04-10: Molecular features of dormancy in ER+ breast cancers. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-04-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:Late recurrence (emergence from dormancy) is characteristic of ER+ breast cancers. Despite adjuvant endocrine therapy, many breast cancers recur decades after their initial diagnosis and treatment. Why this occurs is poorly understood.
Methods: We studied 2 independent datasets of endocrine treated, ER+ breast cancers with up to 20 years follow-up. The 1st comprised matched samples from the primary tumor pretreatment at diagnosis and the first recurrence after or during adjuvant endocrine therapy (all FFPE). The 2nd dataset comprised pretreatment biopsies only (all snap frozen). For both datasets, high quality RNA was amplified, labelled, and subjected to transcriptome analysis using the Affymetrix technology (U133 Plus 2.0). Low quality data were identified using 'simpleaffy' and 'ffpe', and removed; all tools were from the R package unless otherwise noted. Remaining data were normalized using 'frma'. Genes differentially expressed between early (≤3 years) and late (≥ 5 years) were selected using limma. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and PCA explored the structure of the data.
A similar molecular analysis was done on the 2nd dataset. A classification scheme that robustly separated early from late recurrences was validated in an independent public dataset of comparable patients, array platform, and frozen tissues. We also explored features in pretreatment samples that predetermined response duration.
Results: Genes that separated pretreatment specimens by recurrence time did not separate posttreatment specimens. Specimens did not cluster in patient pairs or by site of recurrence.
8245 genes were differentially expressed between early and late recurrences in the FFPE samples, while 2400 genes were significantly different in the same comparison in the frozen samples. Initial pathway analysis was done on each dataset independently using IPA (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com). 70 canonical pathways were identified in common between the two datasets (pretreatment). We then looked for genes regulated in both datasets (ignores FFPE and frozen tissue as source). There were 279 genes in common that differentially regulated in the same direction (upregulated; downregulated). IPA analysis of these genes identified 49 canonical pathways. We also explored the differentially expressed gene sets using 'GSEA' (www.software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). Pathways consistently associated with early vs. late recurrence include integrin signaling, the unfolded protein response, endoplasmic reticulum stress, actin-based motility, and estrogen biosynthesis.
Conclusion: Analysis of pretreatment tumors can predict early recurrences from those that will remain dormant and recur much later. Recurrent tumors exhibit a remodeled molecular landscape that likely reflects the effects of treatments and/or a recreation of a niche with potentially common features at the site of recurrence. Changes in molecular signaling associated with duration of recurrence are consistent with our experimental model studies in vitro implicating UPR signaling as a major integrator of response to endocrine therapy and duration of survival. Additional data sets are being arrayed and more detailed molecular signaling studies are in progress.
Citation Format: Clarke R, Dixon MJ, Jin L, Turnbull A, Hu R, Zwart A, Wang Y, Xuan J, Sengupta S, Renshaw L, Sims A, Liu MC. Molecular features of dormancy in ER+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Clarke
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - MJ Dixon
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L Jin
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Turnbull
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - R Hu
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Zwart
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Y Wang
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J Xuan
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S Sengupta
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L Renshaw
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Sims
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - MC Liu
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lalani N, Paszat L, Nofech-Mozes S, Sutradhar R, Gu S, Hanna W, Fong C, Miller N, Youngson B, Done SJ, Tuck A, Chang MC, Sengupta S, Jani PA, Bonin M, Rakovitch E. Abstract P2-12-02: Is breast-conserving therapy effective in women with large ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions? A population-based analysis. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-12-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Most women diagnosed with DCIS will be treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiotherapy (RT). Data on outcomes following breast-conserving therapy are predominantly based on women with small (<25mm) lesions. The paucity of data on outcomes of women with larger (>40mm) DCIS lesions leads to uncertainty of the appropriateness of breast-conserving therapy for women with larger lesions. Specifically, it is unclear if women with large tumors experience higher risks of local recurrence (LR) and invasive LR after BCS+/-RT that would preclude recommendations of breast-conserving therapy. We report the outcomes and evaluate the impact of large tumor size (>40mm) on recurrence risk in a population of women with pure DCIS treated by BCS alone or with RT.
Methods: The cohort includes all women diagnosed with DCIS in Ontario from 1994-2003 treated with BCS +/- RT; 82% had pathology review. Treatment and outcomes were ascertained through administrative databases and validated by chart review. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the impact of tumor size (≤10mm,11-25mm, 26-39mm, ≥40mm) on the development of any LR (DCIS or invasive) and invasive LR. The 10 and 15-year LR-free survival (LRFS) and invasive LRFS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with differences compared using the log-rank test.
Results: The cohort includes 3262 women with DCIS treated by BCS (N=1635 had RT). Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (IQR 50-68 years). Median follow-up was 13 years (IQR 8-15 years). Distribution of tumor size: 707 (22%) ≤10mm, 524 (16%) 11-25mm, 107 (3%) 26-39mm, 84 (3%) ≥40mm, unable to determine in 1840 (56%). Women with lesions ≥ 40mm were more likely to be ≤50 years of age at diagnosis (p=.02), have high nuclear grade (p<.001), multifocality (p<.001), and positive margins (p<.001) compared to women with smaller lesions. On multivariable analyses adjusted for age and year of diagnosis, tumor size ≥40mm was significantly associated with an increased risk of LR compared to size ≤10mm (HR=2.5, 95%CI:1.64-3.81). Other factors associated with LR were age <50 years (p<.001), omission of RT (p<.001), high nuclear grade (p=.002), and multifocality (p=.0008). Tumor size ≥40mm was not significantly associated with an increased risk of invasive LR (HR=1.68, 95%CI:.94-3.04). Women with tumour size ≥40mm treated with BCS alone had lower 10 and 15 year LRFS (53% and 41%) and invasive LRFS rates (78% and 75%) compared to women with smaller lesions. However, women with larger lesions treated with RT had significantly higher LRFS and invasive LRFS rates
Outcomes by tumour size for women with DCIS treated with BCS with or without RT ≤10mm N=70711-25mm N=52426-39mm N=107≥40mm N=84p-valueBCS AloneLRFS (%) 10 yr85797053<0.001 15 yr81746741 Invasive LRFS (%) 10 yr928786780.03 15 yr89838375 BCS + RTLRFS (%) 10 yr928874850.01 15 yr86847079 Invasive LRFS (%) 10 yr959492910.27 15 yr90918789
. There was a significant interaction between tumor size ≥40mm and RT (p=.02).
Conclusions: Women with DCIS lesions ≥40mm treated by BCS alone experience significantly higher risks of LR and invasive LR compared to smaller lesions but this risk can be mitigated with the addition of RT.
Citation Format: Lalani N, Paszat L, Nofech-Mozes S, Sutradhar R, Gu S, Hanna W, Fong C, Miller N, Youngson B, Done SJ, Tuck A, Chang MC, Sengupta S, Jani PA, Bonin M, Rakovitch E. Is breast-conserving therapy effective in women with large ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions? A population-based analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Lalani
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - L Paszat
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - S Nofech-Mozes
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - R Sutradhar
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - S Gu
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - W Hanna
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - C Fong
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - N Miller
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - B Youngson
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - SJ Done
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - A Tuck
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - MC Chang
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - S Sengupta
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - PA Jani
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - M Bonin
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - E Rakovitch
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; Univeristy Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Sudbury Regional Hospital, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Blinman PL, Davis ID, Martin A, Troon S, Sengupta S, Hovey E, Coskinas X, Kaplan R, Ritchie A, Meade A, Eisen T, Stockler MR. Patients' preferences for adjuvant sorafenib after resection of renal cell carcinoma in the SORCE trial: what makes it worthwhile? Ann Oncol 2018; 29:370-376. [PMID: 29177440 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We sought to determine the survival benefits that patients judged sufficient to warrant adjuvant therapy with sorafenib for 1 year, or for 3 years after resection of renal cell carcinoma in the SORCE trial. Methods SORCE participants from all sites in Australia and New Zealand, and selected sites in the UK, completed a validated preferences questionnaire at months 0, 3, 15, and 42 to elicit the minimum survival benefits they judged sufficient to warrant adjuvant sorafenib for 1 year (versus observation), or for 3 years (versus 1 year). The questionnaires used reference survival times of 5 and 15 years; and reference survival rates at 5 years of 65% and 85%. Results The 233 participants had a median age of 57 years (range 29-78) and 71% were male. For 1 year of sorafenib versus no adjuvant therapy, the median benefits in survival times judged sufficient to warrant treatment were an extra 9 months beyond 5 years and an extra 1 year beyond 15 years; the median benefit in survival rates were an extra 4% beyond 65% and an extra 3% beyond 85% at 5 years. For 3 years of sorafenib versus 1 year of sorafenib, the median benefit in survival time judged sufficient to warrant extended treatment was an extra 1 year beyond both 5 and 15 years. Participants randomly allocated to treatment with sorafenib judged larger benefits necessary than those allocated to placebo. Participants' preferences were not associated with their baseline characteristics or the interval from randomisation. Conclusion Most participants judged an extra year of survival necessary to warrant 1 year of adjuvant sorafenib worthwhile, and an additional year of survival to warrant extending the duration of sorafenib from 1 to 3 years. Patients' preferences are important in shared decision making. SORCE trial clinical trials number NCT00492258.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P L Blinman
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia; ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia.
| | - I D Davis
- ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia; Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia
| | - A Martin
- ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - S Troon
- ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - S Sengupta
- ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - E Hovey
- ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - X Coskinas
- ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - R Kaplan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - A Ritchie
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
| | - A Meade
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - T Eisen
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M R Stockler
- Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia; ANZUP Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sengupta S, Sindal MD, Besirli CG, Upadhyaya S, Venkatesh R, Niziol LM, Robin AL, Woodward MA, Newman-Casey PA. Screening for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in South India: comparing portable non-mydriatic and standard fundus cameras and clinical exam. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32:375-383. [PMID: 28912515 PMCID: PMC5811716 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a portable non-mydriatic fundus camera to diagnose vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR).Patients and methodsA prospective, single-site, comparative instrument validation study was undertaken at the Aravind Eye Care System. Overall, 155 subjects with and without diabetes were recruited. Images from 275 eyes were obtained with the (1) non-mydriatic Smartscope, (2) mydriatic Smartscope, and (3) mydriatic table-top camera of the macular, nasal, and superotemporal fields. A retina specialist performed a dilated fundus examination (DFE), (reference standard). Two masked retina specialists graded the images. Sensitivity and specificity to detect VTDR with the undilated Smartscope was calculated compared to DFE.ResultsGraders 1 and 2 had a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval (CI): 87-97%) and 88% (95% CI: 81-93%) and a specificity of 84% (95% CI: 77-89%) and 90% (95% CI: 84-94%), respectively, in diagnosing VTDR with the undilated Smartscope compared to DFE. Compared with the dilated Topcon images, graders 1 and 2 had sensitivity of 88% (95% CI: 81-93%) and 82% (95% CI: 73-88%) and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 96-100%) and 99% (95% CI: 95-100%).ConclusionsRemote graders had high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing VTDR with undilated Smartscope images, suggesting utility where portability is a necessity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Sengupta
- Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
| | - M D Sindal
- Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
| | - C G Besirli
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - S Upadhyaya
- Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
| | - R Venkatesh
- Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
| | - L M Niziol
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - A L Robin
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - M A Woodward
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - P A Newman-Casey
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a case of bilateral cataract with posterior vitreous detachment induced by lightning injury. METHODS A case report of 30 year old man injured by lightning. RESULTS The patient developed visually significant bilateral cataract after four years of the initial insult on the scalp. The exit wound was noted on the right foot. Fundus evaluation after cataract extraction revealed posterior vitreous detachment. CONCLUSIONS Lightning can induce various ocular complications. Decrease in vision due to cataract is usually seen years after the initial lightning injury as the initial changes are in the mid-periphery and often missed in the acute setting. Posterior vitreous detachment induced by lightning can rarely lead to retinal tear formation and subsequently retinal detachment. The severity of entry and exit may not give a true picture of the internal organ damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gupta
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kohli M, Sharma S, Sengupta S. Urinary proteins as potential biomarkers for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.11.486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
44
|
Lalani N, Paszat L, Sutradhar R, Gu S, Fong C, S. nofech-Mozes, Hanna W, Tuck A, Youngson B, Miller N, Done S, Chang M, Sengupta S, Elavathil L, Jani P, Bonin M, Rakovitch E. Impact of Microinvasion as a Predictor of Local Recurrence in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated With Breast Conserving Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
45
|
Spencer S, Chao M, Guerrieri M, Ding W, Goharian M, Ho H, Ng M, Healey D, Tan A, Cham C, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N, Sengupta S, Chan Y, Troy A. Analysis of LDR Outcomes in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Incorporating a Significant TURP Cohort: A Community Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.1237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
46
|
Ho H, Chao M, Spencer S, Ding W, Subramanian B, Chan Y, Pham T, Tan A, Joon DL, Lawrentschuk N, Sengupta S, Bolton D, Foroudi F, Khoo V, Smith J. A Pilot Study: The Role of Radio-Opaque Hydrogel Tissue Marker in the Treatment of Postprostatectomy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.1174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
47
|
Lawrence N, Martin A, Davis I, Troon S, Sengupta S, Hovey E, Coskinas X, Kaplan R, Ritchie A, Meade A, Eisen T, Blinman P, Stockler M. Predicted benefits of adjuvant sorafenib after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in SORCE: an international, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx371.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
48
|
Kaye DL, Fornari V, Scharf M, Fremont W, Zuckerbrot R, Foley C, Hargrave T, Smith BA, Wallace J, Blakeslee G, Petras J, Sengupta S, Singarayer J, Cogswell A, Bhatia I, Jensen P. Description of a multi-university education and collaborative care child psychiatry access program: New York State's CAP PC. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2017; 48:32-36. [PMID: 28917392 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although, child mental health problems are widespread, few get adequate treatment, and there is a severe shortage of child psychiatrists. To address this public health need many states have adopted collaborative care programs to assist primary care to better assess and manage pediatric mental health concerns. This report adds to the small literature on collaborative care programs and describes one large program that covers most of New York state. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION CAP PC, a component program of New York State's Office of Mental Health (OMH) Project TEACH, has provided education and consultation support to primary care providers covering most of New York state since 2010. The program is uniquely a five medical school collaboration with hubs at each that share one toll free number and work together to provide education and consultation support services to PCPs. METHODS The program developed a clinical communications record to track information about all consultations which forms the basis of much of this report. 2-week surveys following consultations, annual surveys, and pre- and post-educational program evaluations have also been used to measure the success of the program. RESULTS CAP PC has grown over the 6years of the program and has provided 8013 phone consultations to over 1500 PCPs. The program synergistically provided 17,523 CME credits of educational programming to 1200 PCPs. PCP users of the program report very high levels of satisfaction and self reported growth in confidence. CONCLUSIONS CAP PC demonstrates that large-scale collaborative consultation models for primary care are feasible to implement, popular with PCPs, and can be sustained. The program supports increased access to child mental health services in primary care and provides child psychiatric expertise for patients who would otherwise have none.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Kaye
- University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States.
| | - V Fornari
- Hofstra/Northwell Health School of Medicine, Glen Oaks, NY, United States
| | - M Scharf
- University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - W Fremont
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - R Zuckerbrot
- Columbia University Medical Center/NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States
| | - C Foley
- Hofstra/Northwell Health School of Medicine, Glen Oaks, NY, United States
| | - T Hargrave
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - B A Smith
- University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - J Wallace
- University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - G Blakeslee
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - J Petras
- Columbia University Medical Center/NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States
| | - S Sengupta
- University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - J Singarayer
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - A Cogswell
- University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - I Bhatia
- University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - P Jensen
- REACH Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AK, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Affiliation(s)
- S. Sengupta
- Command Hospital (EC), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- S. Sengupta
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia & Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia PA USA
| | - A. Haczku
- University of California, Davis; Davis CA USA
| |
Collapse
|