Quality assurance of serial tomotherapy for head and neck patient treatments

An oblique arc capable patient positioning system for sequential tomotherapy

A new patient positioning system has been designed and manufactured, allowing for the accurate delivery of obliquely oriented intensity modulated treatment arcs via a commercially available IMRT system. The ability to deliver such obliquely oriented intensity modulated arcs allows the commercial system to more closely approach a 4pi pencil beam delivery geometry which, in turn, allows for significant improvements in conformality for many tumor geometries. While the IMRT system delivered to this institution in the fall of 1996 was capable of planning for nonparallel plane delivery schemes, it proved incapable of delivering such treatments with acceptable accuracy. Because our early clinical experience revealed that certain patients could benefit significantly from such a delivery scheme we endeavored to design and manufacture an alternative treatment couch/patient positioning system (Xlator) which could overcome the limitations of the vendor supplied system. We present our initial evidence for the benefits of obliquely oriented intensity modulated treatment arcs, along with data demonstrating the inability of the original vendor supplied system to deliver such treatments with acceptable accuracy. The design of our new system is presented, as well as data demonstrating its ability to accurately deliver obliquely oriented intensity-modulated arcs. A detailed comparison of the performance of the Xlator and the vendor-supplied system is presented with regard to match line repeatability and hysteresis. Finally, the ability of the Xlator to deliver multiple couch angle sequential tomotherapy with spatial accuracy necessary to radiosurgical applications is demonstrated via a AAPM Report 54,TG-42 hidden target test. Readers note: The Xlator patient positioning system designed and patented here has recently come to be commercially available, and is currently marketed by the vendor under the name Crane II.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: current status and issues of interest

PURPOSE

To develop and disseminate a report aimed primarily at practicing radiation oncology physicians and medical physicists that describes the current state-of-the-art of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Those areas needing further research and development are identified by category and recommendations are given, which should also be of interest to IMRT equipment manufacturers and research funding agencies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The National Cancer Institute formed a Collaborative Working Group of experts in IMRT to develop consensus guidelines and recommendations for implementation of IMRT and for further research through a critical analysis of the published data supplemented by clinical experience. A glossary of the words and phrases currently used in IMRT is given in the. Recommendations for new terminology are given where clarification is needed.

RESULTS

IMRT, an advanced form of external beam irradiation, is a type of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). It represents one of the most important technical advances in RT since the advent of the medical linear accelerator. 3D-CRT/IMRT is not just an add-on to the current radiation oncology process; it represents a radical change in practice, particularly for the radiation oncologist. For example, 3D-CRT/IMRT requires the use of 3D treatment planning capabilities, such as defining target volumes and organs at risk in three dimensions by drawing contours on cross-sectional images (i.e., CT, MRI) on a slice-by-slice basis as opposed to drawing beam portals on a simulator radiograph. In addition, IMRT requires that the physician clearly and quantitatively define the treatment objectives. Currently, most IMRT approaches will increase the time and effort required by physicians, medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists, because IMRT planning and delivery systems are not yet robust enough to provide totally automated solutions for all disease sites. Considerable research is needed to model the clinical outcomes to allow truly automated solutions. Current IMRT delivery systems are essentially first-generation systems, and no single method stands out as the ultimate technique. The instrumentation and methods used for IMRT quality assurance procedures and testing are not yet well established. In addition, many fundamental questions regarding IMRT are still unanswered. For example, the radiobiologic consequences of altered time-dose fractionation are not completely understood. Also, because there may be a much greater ability to trade off dose heterogeneity in the target vs. avoidance of normal critical structures with IMRT compared with traditional RT techniques, conventional radiation oncology planning principles are challenged. All in all, this new process of planning and treatment delivery has significant potential for improving the therapeutic ratio and reducing toxicity. Also, although inefficient currently, it is expected that IMRT, when fully developed, will improve the overall efficiency with which external beam RT can be planned and delivered, and thus will potentially lower costs.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations in the areas pertinent to IMRT, including dose-calculation algorithms, acceptance testing, commissioning and quality assurance, facility planning and radiation safety, and target volume and dose specification, are presented. Several of the areas in which future research and development are needed are also indicated. These broad recommendations are intended to be both technical and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for clinical decisions pertaining to the implementation and use of IMRT rests with the radiation oncologist and radiation oncology physicist. This is an evolving field, and modifications of these recommendations are expected as new technology and data become available.

Verification of dynamic intensity-modulated beam deliveries in canine subjects

Our objective in this work was to assess the precision and degree of accuracy with which intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can deliver highly localized dose distributions to tumors near critical structures using the dynamic sliding window technique. Measurements of dose distribution were performed both in vivo and in vitro using a combination of dosimeters [thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's), films, and diodes]. In vivo measurements were performed in two groups of purpose-bred dogs: one receiving four-field three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment and the other receiving IMRT. The algorithms used in the inverse planning process included the Macro Pencil Beam (MPB) model and Projections onto Convex Sets (POCS). Single beam measurements were performed in phantoms to verify the accuracy of monitor unit settings required for delivering the desired doses. The composite doses from the delivery of the seven beam intensity modulated plans were measured in phantoms and cadavers, Biological end points (spinal cord toxicity and neurologic deficits due to irradiation) were evaluated at the end of one year to determine the spatial accuracy of the IMRT treatments over a fractionated course in live subjects. Results in single beam measurements were used at first to improve the dose calculation and translation algorithms. Results of the measurements for the delivery of all seven beams in phantoms confirmed that the system was capable of accurate spatial and dosimetric IMRT delivery. The in vivo results showed dramatic differences between control and IMRT-treated dogs, with the IMRT group showing no adverse effects and the control animals showing severe spinal cord injuries due to irradiation. The measurements presented in this paper have helped to verify the successful and accurate delivery of IMRT in a clinically related model using the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) system.

NOMOS Peacock IMRT utilizing the Beak post collimation device

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), an exciting recent development in the field of radiation therapy, is widely anticipated by many to make possible significant improvements in the quality of radiation treatments delivered to patients. The NOMOS Peacock method of delivery, often referred to as serial tomotherapy because of its "slice-wise" treatment of a tumor, has been used since 1994 to treat some 8000+ patients worldwide. This slice-wise method of treatment is known to produce extremely conformal dose distributions due to its ability to specifically match the dose distribution on each slice to the shape of the target volume on that same slice. Based on the belief of this institution, and the NOMOS Corporation, that an increase in the number of treatment slices into which the target is segmented would lead directly to an improvement in three-dimensional (3D) dose conformality, a joint effort was undertaken to develop a new MIMIC collimator treatment mode. Inherent to the original design of the NOMOS MIMIC binary multileaf collimator were 2 treatment modes: a 2-cm mode with a slice thickness of approximately 1.7 cm and a 1-cm mode with a slice thickness of approximately 0.85 cm. As a result of this collaborative effort, a new MIMIC treatment mode has been developed. The method employs a slit collimator, post-collimation device known as the BEAK, enabling the treatment mode referred to as Beak Mode. The device imposes a distal redefinition of the slice thickness, or length, by effectively blocking the full retraction of the MIMIC vanes. The end result is a newly available slice thickness of approximately 4 mm, which is shown in this work to yield significant improvements in dose conformality for 2 representative patients. The comparative analysis of these 2 patient plans includes, in addition to a comparison of isodose distributions, an evaluation of dose-volume histogram (DVH) information, and a comparison of indices of conformality (CI) and homogeneity (HI).

Quality assurance procedures for the Peacock system

The Peacock system is the product of technological innovations that are changing the practice of radiotherapy. It uses dynamic beam modulation technique and inverse planning algorithm, both of which are new methodologies, to perform intensity-modulation radiation therapy (IMRT). The quality assurance (QA) procedure established by Task Group No. 40 did not adequately consider these emerging modalities. A review of literature indicates that published articles on QA procedures concentrate primarily on the verification of dose delivered to phantom during commissioning of the system and dose delivered to phantom before treating patients. Absolute dose measurements using ion chambers and relative dose measurements using film dosimetry have been used to verify delivered doses. QA on equipment performance and equipment safety is limited. This paper will discuss QA on equipment performance, equipment safety, and patient setup reproducibility.

Forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator IMRT and sequential tomotherapy to treat multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions of prostate cancer to 90 Gy

PURPOSE

To investigate the technical feasibility of using forward or inversely planned segmental multileaf collimator (SMLC) intensity-modulated radiotherapy and sequential tomotherapy (ST) to escalate to a dose of 90 Gy to multiple dominant intraprostatic lesions within the prostate gland while delivering a dose of 75.6 Gy to the remaining prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A selected case with one dominant intraprostatic lesion located at the left base and a second dominant intraprostatic lesion at the right apex of the prostate was planned using three different intensity modulation techniques. Two plans were generated with inverse treatment planning, using either SMLC or ST with a special multivane collimator. The third plan also employed SMLC but was generated using forward planning. All three plans were compared based on dose-volume histograms, isodose distributions, and doses to sensitive normal structures.

RESULTS

All three plans meet and exceed the desired dose constraints, limiting doses to the rectum and bladder to an estimated RTOG Grade 2 complication rate of <10%. The ST plan achieved the best dose conformality, whereas the inverse SMLC plan gave the lowest dose to the rectal wall, and the forward SMLC plan obtained the best dose homogeneity inside the targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Using any of the three intensity-modulated techniques, it is technically feasible to concurrently treat multiple selected high-risk regions within the prostate to 90 Gy and the remaining prostate to 75.6 Gy, while keeping the doses to the rectum and the bladder significantly lower than those associated with a Grade 2 complication rate of 10%.

Commissioning of a commercially available system for intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose delivery with dynamic multileaf collimation

PURPOSE

To commission commercially available equipment for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First, the stability in leaf positioning and in realized IMRT profiles on a Varian 2300 C/D machine were determined as a function of time and gantry angle, and as a result of treatment interrupts. Second, dose distributions calculated with the CadPlan (Varian) treatment planning system, using leaf trajectories calculated with the leaf motion calculator (LMC) algorithm, were compared with distributions realized at the 2300 C/D unit.

RESULTS

Day-to-day and gantry angle variations in leaf positioning and dose delivery were very small (less than 0.1-0.2 mm and 2%). The effect of treatment interrupts on measured dose distributions was less than 2%. The agreement between the final dose distribution calculated by CadPlan and the measured dose was generally within 2%, or 2 mm at steep dose gradients, using a leaf transmission value of 1.8% and a leaf separation value of 2 mm in LMC. For narrow peaks, deviations of up to 6% were observed. LMC does not synchronize adjacent leaf trajectories resulting in tongue-and-groove underdosages of up to 29% for extreme cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2300 C/D machine is suitable for accurate and reproducible DMLC treatments. The agreement between dose predictions with LMC and CadPlan, and realized doses at this unit is clinically acceptable for most cases. However, differences between calculated and actual dose values may exist in peaked fluences or due to tongue-and-groove effects. Therefore, pretreatment dosimetric verification for each patient is recommended.

A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Locoregional tumor control for locally advanced cancers with radiation therapy has been unsatisfactory. This is in part associated with the phenomenon of tumor hypoxia. Assessing hypoxia in human tumors has been difficult due to the lack of clinically noninvasive and reproducible methods. A recently developed positron emission tomography (PET) imaging-based hypoxia measurement technique which employs a Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM) tracer is of great interest. Oxygen electrode measurements in animal experiments have demonstrated a strong correlation between low tumor pO(2) and excess (60)Cu-ATSM accumulation. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows selective targeting of tumor and sparing of normal tissues. In this study, we examined the feasibility of combining these novel technologies to develop hypoxia imaging (Cu-ATSM)-guided IMRT, which may potentially deliver higher dose of radiation to the hypoxic tumor subvolume to overcome inherent hypoxia-induced radioresistance without compromising normal tissue sparing.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A custom-designed anthropomorphic head phantom containing computed tomography (CT) and positron emitting tomography (PET) visible targets consisting of plastic balls and rods distributed throughout the "cranium" was fabricated to assess the spatial accuracy of target volume mapping after multimodality image coregistration. For head-and-neck cancer patients, a CT and PET imaging fiducial marker coregistration system was integrated into the thermoplastic immobilization head mask with four CT and PET compatible markers to assist image fusion on a Voxel-Q treatment-planning computer. This system was implemented on head-and-neck cancer patients, and the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated based on physical and radiologic findings. Within GTV, regions with a (60)Cu-ATSM uptake twice that of contralateral normal neck muscle were operationally designated as ATSM-avid or hypoxic tumor volume (hGTV) for this feasibility study. These target volumes along with other normal organs contours were defined and transferred to an inverse planning computer (Corvus, NOMOS) to create a hypoxia imaging-guided IMRT treatment plan.

RESULTS

A study of the accuracy of target volume mapping showed that the spatial fidelity and imaging distortion after CT and PET image coregistration and fusion were within 2 mm in phantom study. Using fiducial markers to assist CT/PET imaging fusion in patients with carcinoma of the head-and-neck area, a heterogeneous distribution of (60)Cu-ATSM within the GTV illustrated the success of (60)Cu-ATSM PET to select an ATSM-avid or hypoxic tumor subvolume (hGTV). We further demonstrated the feasibility of Cu-ATSM-guided IMRT by showing an example in which radiation dose to the hGTV could be escalated without compromising normal tissue (parotid glands and spinal cord) sparing. The plan delivers 80 Gy in 35 fractions to the ATSM-avid tumor subvolume and the GTV simultaneously receives 70 Gy in 35 fractions while more than one-half of the parotid glands are spared to less than 30 Gy.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the feasibility of a novel Cu-ATSM-guided IMRT approach through coregistering hypoxia (60)Cu-ATSM PET to the corresponding CT images for IMRT planning. Future investigation is needed to establish a clinical-pathologic correlation between (60)Cu-ATSM retention and radiation curability, to understand tumor re-oxygenation kinetics, and tumor target uncertainty during a course of radiation therapy before implementing this therapeutic approach to patients with locally advanced tumor.

Conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy--clinical data

Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) is based on three hypotheses: (i) a higher rate of local control can improve the survival rate; (ii) dose escalation can increase tumor control; and (iii) CRT allows the delivery of higher doses by decreasing the incidence of late effects. These postulates are now supported by several data. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has markedly progressed since its introduction two decades ago. However, there are situations for which 3D-CRT cannot produce a satisfactory treatment plan because of complex target volume shapes or the close proximity of sensitive normal tissues. This is why intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was introduced. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of 3D-CRT by adding modulators of beam intensity to beam shaping. IMRT can achieve nearly any dose distribution; however, the role of the planner remains crucial. CRT has been investigated mainly for prostate cancers and head and neck cancers. By and large, the clinical data, although still limited, seem to confirm the advantages of this type of radiotherapy. Dose escalation in prostate cancers improves the local control rate without increasing late effects and for this cancer site IMRT appears to be a significant advance over conventional 3D-CRT. In head and neck cancers the clinical data are still scarce but encouraging. CRT should be investigated in breast cancers with the aim of reducing the incidence of late effects. The available data underline the great potential for major progress in 3D-CRT and IMRT. The techniques are still costly and time consuming, nevertheless they merit investigation since their cost should decrease. Efforts should be concentrated on the specification of robust optimization criteria, taking into account clinical and radiobiological data.

Leaf position error during conformal dynamic arc and intensity modulated arc treatments

Conformal dynamic arc (CD-ARC) and intensity modulated arc treatments (IMAT) are both treatment modalities where the multileaf collimator (MLC) can change leaf position dynamically during gantry rotation. These treatment techniques can be used to generate complex isodose distributions, similar to those used in fix-gantry intensity modulation. However, a beam-hold delay cannot be used during CD-ARC or IMAT treatments to reduce spatial error. Consequently, a certain amount of leaf position error will have to be accepted in order to make the treatment deliverable. Measurements of leaf position accuracy were taken with leaf velocities ranging from 0.3 to 3.0 cm/s. The average and maximum leaf position errors were measured, and a least-squares linear regression analysis was performed on the measured data to determine the MLC velocity error coefficient. The average position errors range from 0.03 to 0.21 cm, with the largest deviations occurring at the maximum achievable leaf velocity (3.0 cm/s). The measured MLC velocity error coefficient was 0.0674 s for a collimator rotation of 0 degrees and 0.0681 s for a collimator rotation of 90 degrees. The distribution in leaf position error between the 0 degrees and 90 degrees collimator rotations was within statistical uncertainty. A simple formula was developed based on these results for estimating the velocity-dependent dosimetric error. Using this technique, a dosimetric error index for plan evaluation can be calculated from the treatment time and the dynamic MLC leaf controller file.

Validation of a precision radiochromic film dosimetry system for quantitative two-dimensional imaging of acute exposure dose distributions

We present an evaluation of the precision and accuracy of image-based radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry performed using a commercial RCF product (Gafchromic MD-55-2, Nuclear Associates, Inc.) and a commercial high-spatial resolution (100 microm pixel size) He-Ne scanning-laser film-digitizer (Personal Densitometer, Molecular Dynamics, Inc.) as an optical density (OD) imaging system. The precision and accuracy of this dosimetry system are evaluated by performing RCF imaging dosimetry in well characterized conformal external beam and brachytherapy high dose-rate (HDR) radiation fields. Benchmarking of image-based RCF dosimetry is necessary due to many potential errors inherent to RCF dosimetry including: a temperature-dependent time evolution of RCF dose response; nonuniform response of RCF; and optical-polarization artifacts. In addition, laser-densitometer imaging artifacts can produce systematic OD measurement errors as large as 35% in the presence of high OD gradients. We present a RCF exposure and readout protocol that was developed for the accurate dosimetry of high dose rate (HDR) radiation sources. This protocol follows and expands upon the guidelines set forth by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 55 report. Particular attention is focused on the OD imaging system, a scanning-laser film digitizer, modified to eliminate OD artifacts that were not addressed in the AAPM Task Group 55 report. RCF precision using this technique was evaluated with films given uniform 6 MV x-ray doses between 1 and 200 Gy. RCF absolute dose accuracy using this technique was evaluated by comparing RCF measurements to small volume ionization chamber measurements for conformal external-beam sources and an experimentally validated Monte Carlo photon-transport simulation code for a 192Ir brachytherapy source. Pixel-to-pixel standard deviations of uniformly irradiated films were less than 1% for doses between 10 and 150 Gy; between 1% and 5% for lower doses down to 1 Gy and 1% and 1.5% for higher doses up to 200 Gy. Pixel averaging to form 200-800 microm pixels reduces these standard deviations by a factor of 2 to 5. Comparisons of absolute dose show agreement within 1.5%-4% of dose benchmarks, consistent with a highly accurate dosimeter limited by its observed precision and the precision of the dose standards to which it is compared. These results provide a comprehensive benchmarking of RCF, enabling its use in the commissioning of novel HDR therapy sources.

Dose optimization for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a comparison of treatment planning techniques

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare dose optimization for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma using a 3D conformal plan, and two 3D intensity-modulated inverse plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

After patient immobilization using an alpha cradle and head-mask system, a postoperative CT scan was obtained to delineate the gross tumor volume (GTV), the clinical tumor volume (CTV), and adjacent critical structures. Treatment plans were generated using UM-Plan (University of Michigan), PeacockPlan and Corvus (NOMOS Corporation, Sewickley, PA). Isodoses were displayed in the sagittal, coronal, and multiple axial planes, and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the GTV, CTV, and critical normal tissues. Treatment times were estimated to compare the practicality of delivering each plan in a busy radiotherapy department.

RESULTS

All three treatment planning systems were able to deliver a minimum dose of 60 Gy to the GTV while keeping the maximum spinal cord dose at or below 45 Gy. However, there were differences in the doses delivered to 50% and 5% of the cord, the minimum CTV dose, and the overall treatment time. The PeacockPlan best spared the uninvolved tissues of the posterior neck, and provided the lowest dose to the cord without compromising the CTV.

CONCLUSIONS

Inverse treatment planning provides superior dose optimization for the treatment of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. The radiobiologic impact of intensity modulation for this tumor should be further tested clinically.

Radiotherapy in head and neck cancer in the elderly: a challenge

Elderly patients represent the most rapidly growing subgroup of the patient population in France and in the majority of industrialized countries. The effect of age in terms of the prognosis and response to treatment remains unclear. The management strategy (curative versus palliative) for head and neck cancer in the elderly has given vent to divergent opinions and controversies in several respects (the type and quality of treatment, quality of life and economic consequences). This review only focuses on the radiotherapy schedule and head and neck cancers. We compare aged patients with head and neck cancer to younger patients in terms of clinical features, tumor biology, type of treatment, side effects and response. We conclude that if the patient is in a good general condition following a complete evaluation of the cancer, physicians should propose curative treatment with radiotherapy because retrospective trials demonstrate that response in older patients when treated aggressively is comparable to that of younger patients. However, specific trials concerning aged patients with head and neck cancer, quality of life and radiotherapy are warranted.

Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system

The main purpose of this paper is to describe formalisms, algorithms, and certain unique features of a system for optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The system is coupled to a commercial treatment planning system with an accurate dose calculation engine based on the kernel superposition algorithm. The system was designed for use for research as well as for routine clinical practice. It employs dose- and dose-volume-based objective functions. The system can optimize IMRT plans with multiple target volumes simultaneously. Each target volume may be assigned a different prescription dose with constraints on either underdosing, or overdosing, or both. For organs at risk more than one constraint may be applied. This feature allows simultaneous treatment of primary, regional disease and electively treated nodes. The system allows specification of constraints on logical combinations of anatomic structures, such as a region of overlap between the prostate planning target volume and rectum or the volume of lung excluding the tumor. The optimization may also be performed on plans which, in addition to intensity-modulated beams, include other modalities such as non-IMRT photon and electron beams and brachytherapy sources. The various features of the system are illustrated with one phantom example and two clinical examples: a brain stereotactic radiosurgery case and a nasopharynx case. In the cylindrical phantom example, the use of the system for overlap regions is demonstrated. The brain stereotactic radiosurgery example shows the improvement of IMRT plans over the conventional arcs based plan and the three-dimensional conformal plan with multiple fixed gantry angles and demonstrates the application of our system to cases where small grid sizes are important. The nasopharynx example shows the potential of IMRT to simultaneously treat large and boost fields. It also illustrates the power of IMRT to protect normal anatomic structures for highly complex situations and the efficiency in planning and delivery achievable with IMRT. The overall IMRT planning time is typically less than 2 h on a Sun Ultrasparc workstation, most of which is spent in repeated computation of dose distributions.

Abutment region dosimetry for serial tomotherapy

PURPOSE

A commercial intensity modulated radiation therapy system (Corvus, NOMOS Corp.) is presently used in our clinic to generate optimized dose distributions delivered using a proprietary dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) (MIMiC) composed of 20 opposed leaf pairs. On our accelerator (Clinac 600C/D, Varian Associates, Inc.) each MIMiC leaf projects to either 1.00 x 0.84 or 1.00 x 1.70 cm2 (depending on the treatment plan and termed 1 cm or 2 cm mode, respectively). The MIMiC is used to deliver serial (axial) tomotherapy treatment plans, in which the beam is delivered to a nearly cylindrical volume as the DMLC is rotated about the patient. For longer targets, the patient is moved (indexed) between treatments a distance corresponding to the projected leaf width. The treatment relies on precise indexing and a method was developed to measure the precision of indexing devices. A treatment planning study of the dosimetric effects of incorrect patient indexing and concluded that a dose heterogeneity of 10% mm(-1) resulted. Because the results may be sensitive to the dose model accuracy, we conducted a measurement-based investigation of the consequences of incorrect indexing using our accelerator. Although the indexing provides an accurate field abutment along the isocenter, due to beam divergence, hot and cold spots will be produced below and above isocenter, respectively, when less than 300 degree arcs were used. A preliminary study recently determined that for a 290 degree rotation in 1 cm mode, 15% cold and 7% hot spots were delivered to 7 cm above and below isocenter, respectively. This study completes the earlier work by investigating the dose heterogeneity as a function of position relative to the axis of rotation, arc length, and leaf width. The influence of random daily patient positioning errors is also investigated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment plans were generated using 8.0 cm diameter cylindrical target volumes within a homogeneous rectilinear film phantom. The plans included both 1 and 2 cm mode, optimized for 300 degrees, 240 degrees, and 180 degrees gantry rotations. Coronal-oriented films were irradiated throughout the target volumes and scanned using a laser film digitizer. The central target irradiated in 1 cm mode was also used to investigate the effects of incorrect couch indexing.

RESULTS

The dose error as a function of couch index error was 25% mm(-1), significantly greater than previously reported. The clinically provided indexing system yielded 0.10 mm indexing precision. The intrinsic dose distributions indicated that more heterogeneous dose distributions resulted from the use of smaller gantry angle ranges and larger leaf projections. Using 300 degrees gantry angle and 1 cm mode yielded 7% hot and 15% cold spots 7 cm below and above isocenter, respectively. When a 180 degree gantry angle was used, the values changed to 22% hot and 27% cold spots for the same locations. The heterogeneities for the 2 cm mode were 70% greater than the corresponding 1 cm values.

CONCLUSIONS

While serial tomotherapy is used to deliver highly conformal dose distributions, significant dosimetric factors must be considered before treatment. The patient must be immobilized during treatment to avoid dose heterogeneities caused by incorrect indexing due to patient movement. Even under ideal conditions, beam divergence can cause significant abutment-region dose heterogeneities. The use of larger gantry angle ranges, smaller leaf widths, and appropriate locations of the gantry rotation axis can minimize these effects.

Quantitative dosimetric verification of an IMRT planning and delivery system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The accuracy of dose calculation and delivery of a commercial serial tomotherapy treatment planning and delivery system (Peacock. NOMOS Corporation) was experimentally determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

External beam fluence distributions were optimized and delivered to test treatment plan target volumes, including three with cylindrical targets with diameters ranging from 2.0 to 6.2 cm and lengths of 0.9 through 4.8 cm, one using three cylindrical targets and two using C-shaped targets surrounding a critical structure, each with different dose distribution optimization criteria. Computer overlays of film-measured and calculated planar dose distributions were used to assess the dose calculation and delivery spatial accuracy. A 0.125 cm3 ionization chamber was used to conduct absolute point dosimetry verification. Thermoluminescent dosimetry chips, a small-volume ionization chamber and radiochromic film were used as independent checks of the ion chamber measurements.

RESULTS

Spatial localization accuracy was found to be better than +/-2.0 mm in the transverse axes (with one exception of 3.0 mm) and +/-1.5 mm in the longitudinal axis. Dosimetric verification using single slice delivery versions of the plans showed that the relative dose distribution was accurate to +/-2% within and outside the target volumes (in high dose and low dose gradient regions) with a mean and standard deviation for all points of -0.05% and 1.1%, respectively. The absolute dose per monitor unit was found to vary by +/-3.5% of the mean value due to the lack of consideration for leakage radiation and the limited scattered radiation integration in the dose calculation algorithm. To deliver the prescribed dose, adjustment of the monitor units by the measured ratio would be required.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment planning and delivery system offered suitably accurate spatial registration and dose delivery of serial tomotherapy generated dose distributions. The quantitative dose comparisons were made as far as possible from abutment regions and examination of the dosimetry of these regions will also be important. Because of the variability in the dose per monitor unit and the complex nature of the calculation and delivery of serial tomotherapy, patient-specific quality assurance procedures will include a measurement of the delivered target dose.