Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?

BACKGROUND

Patients with a rectocele often suffer from such symptoms as obstructed defaecation, urine or stool incontinence and pain. The aim of this study was to assess other concomitant pelvic floor disorders and their influence on pelvic function.

METHODS

Included in the study were 37 female patients with a significant rectocele and defaecation disorder. Medical history and symptoms were analysed in terms of validated functional scores. All patients underwent open magnetic resonance defaecography (MRD) in a sitting position. Imaging was analysed for the presence and size of the rectocele, intussusception and other pelvic floor disorders.

RESULTS

Patients with a higher body mass index tended to have a larger rectocele, whereas age and vaginal birth did not correlate with the size of the rectocele. In 67.5% of the patients with a previously diagnosed rectocele, an intussusception was diagnosed on MRD. This group suffered from significantly worse urine incontinence (p=0.023) and from accessory enteroceles 64%, compared with 17% (p=0.013) for those with a simple rectocele. Patients with higher grade intussusception suffered more frequently from incontinence than from constipation.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a symptomatic rectocele frequently have other pelvic floor disorders that significantly influence the pattern of symptoms. Knowledge of all the afflictions is essential for determining the optimal treatment for each individual patient.

MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the anatomy and etiology of pelvic floor weakness in women and to discuss the role of MRI in the assessment of female pelvic floor dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

In women with pelvic floor weakness, pelvic MRI, with its superior soft-tissue contrast resolution, allows direct visualization of the pelvic organs and their supportive structures in a single noninvasive examination. By providing useful and valuable information on the extent and severity of pelvic organ prolapse, MRI plays a valuable role in preoperative planning of complex cases.

MRI of pelvic floor dysfunction: self-assessment module

OBJECTIVE

The educational objectives of this continuing medical education activity are for the reader to exercise, self-assess, and improve skills in diagnostic radiology with regard to the interpretation of MRI of the female pelvis in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction, and to improve familiarity with the clinical features of female pelvic floor dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The articles in this activity review the anatomy and etiology of pelvic floor weakness in women and discuss the role of MRI in the assessment of female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare disorder often misdiagnosed as a malignant ulcer. Histopathological features of SRUS are characteristic and pathognomonic; nevertheless, the endoscopic and clinical presentations may be confusing. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes in patients who suffer from SRUS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken, from January 1989 to May 2005 for all patients who were diagnosed with SRUS. Data recorded included: patient's age, gender, clinical presentation, past surgical history, diagnostic and preoperative workup, operative procedure, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 23 patients were diagnosed with SRUS. Seven patients received only medical treatment, and in three patients, the ulcer healed after medical treatment. Sixteen patients underwent surgical treatment. In four patients, the symptoms persisted after surgery. Two patients presented with postoperative rectal bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Three patients developed late postoperative sexual dysfunction. One patient continued suffering from rectal pain after a colostomy was constructed. Median follow-up was 14 (range 2-84) months.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show clearly that every patient with SRUS must be assessed individually. Initial treatment should include conservative measures. In patients with refractory symptoms, surgical treatment should be considered. Results of anterior resection and protocolectomy are satisfactory for solitary rectal ulcer.

Anorectal motor disorders

Anorectal motor disorders such as faecal incontinence, chronic anorectal pain and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome are common in the community. They cause psychological distress, affect quality of life, and pose a significant economic burden. In recent years, many strides have been made in the diagnostic criteria and in the mechanistic understanding of anorectal disorders. The use of innovative manometric, neurophysiological and radiological techniques have shed new light on the underlying pathophysiology. Also, it has been recognised that psychological dysfunction play an important role. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding what is abnormal, regarding the overlap between phenotypes and regarding optimal diagnostic approaches or tests. There has been little advance in drug therapy for these conditions. Although several treatments have been tried and appear promising, controlled trials are either lacking or have provided insignificant evidence. There is a need for improved medical, behavioural and surgical treatments for these conditions.

Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor defects in women

Contemporary fast magnetic resonance imaging techniques allow dynamic evaluation of the entire female pelvic floor with excellent visualization of pelvic organs and muscular and fascial supportive structures in a single noninvasive study that does not expose the patient to ionizing radiation. This article focuses on the role of magnetic resonance imaging in defining pelvic floor defects that can guide surgical management of women with pelvic organ prolapse, especially those who undergo evaluation for symptoms of multicompartmental involvement before a complex pelvic floor reconstruction or those who have failed previous repairs.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in childhood: a rare, benign, and probably misdiagnosed cause of rectal bleeding. Report of three cases

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is an uncommon and often underdiagnosed condition that usually presents with hematochezia, mucous discharge, and tenesmus. Its etiology is unknown but it seems related to excessive straining with defecation. Prolonged efforts force the anterior rectal mucosa into the anal canal with strangulation and appearance of congestion, edema, and ulceration. Histologic findings (fibromuscular obliteration of lamina propria and disorientation of muscle fibers) are characteristic, which helps to differentiate these lesions from other rectal entities. Although solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is rarely reported in children, it must be suspected in patients with rectal discharge of blood and mucus and previous disorders of evacuation. We present three children (aged 9, 10, and 14 years) with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome that had presented with rectal bleeding. A careful inquiry about evacuation habits and a high index of suspicion in children presenting with hematochezia helps to diagnose this possibly unrecognized or misdiagnosed entity in children. Endoscopy and histologic examination confirms this condition.

Rectal prolapse

INTRODUCTION

Rectal prolapse, or procidentia, is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. It commonly occurs at the extremes of age. Rectal prolapse frequently coexists with other pelvic floor disorders, and patients have symptoms associated with combined rectal and genital prolapse. Few patients, a lack of randomized trials and difficulties in the interpretation of studies of anorectal physiology have made the understanding of this disorder difficult.

METHODS OF TREATMENT

Surgical management is aimed at restoring physiology by correcting the prolapse and improving continence and constipation, whereas in patients with concurrent genital and rectal prolapse, an interdisciplinary surgical approach is required. Operation should be reserved for those patients in whom medical treatment has failed, and it may be expected to relieve symptoms. Numerous surgical procedures have been suggested to treat rectal prolapse. They are generally classified as abdominal or perineal according to the route of access. However, the controversy as to which operation is appropriate cannot be answered definitively, as the extent of a standardized diagnostic assessment and the types of surgical procedures have not been identified in published series.

LITERATURE REVIEW

This review encompasses rectal prolapse, including aetiology, symptoms and treatment. The English-language literature about rectal prolapse was identified using Medline, and additional cited works not detected in the initial search were obtained. Articles reporting on prospective and retrospective comparisons and case reports were included.

Multimedia article. External pelvic rectal suspension (the express procedure) for internal rectal prolapse, with or without concomitant rectocele repair: a video demonstration

PURPOSE

Internal rectal prolapse has been proposed as a cause of symptomatic rectal evacuatory dysfunction. Abdominal rectopexy, the standard surgical approach, has significant attendant risk and does not address any concomitant rectocele. This video was designed to demonstrate a novel surgical method that uses porcine collagen implants (Permacol), designed to correct internal rectal prolapse, with or without rectocele.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

severe rectal evacuatory dysfunction refractory to maximal conservative therapy and full-thickness internal rectal prolapse impeding rectal emptying on defecography with or without associated functional rectocoele; normal colonic transit. Patients undergo comprehensive preoperative and postoperative symptomatic assessment and anorectal physiologic testing, including defecography. A crescenteric perineal skin incision allows development of the rectovaginal/rectoprostatic plane to Denonvilliers fascia, with rectal mobilization. A curved tunneller inserted via the perineal wound is guided retropubically to emerge through suprapubic wounds created on each side. Permacol T-strips are sutured to the anterolateral rectal wall bilaterally, upward traction exerted, and the stem of each T-strip is sutured to the suprapubic periosteum, suspending the rectum. Concomitant rectocele is repaired using a Permacol patch in the rectovaginal plane.

RESULTS

Short-term results for the "Express" are encouraging with improvement in evacuatory and prolapse symptoms and concomitant anatomic improvement at defecography.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure promises to be an effective technique for managing patients with refractory evacuatory dysfunction secondary to internal rectal prolapse, with or without rectocele.

Colitis cystica profunda and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome-polypoid variant: Two confusing clinical conditions

Colitis cystica profunda and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome-polyoid variant are related chronic benign disorders with characteristic histological features. However, the clinical and endoscopic settings are confusing and misleading, suggesting other rectal conditions. We report a case of colitis cystica profunda and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome-polypoid variant that was misdiagnosed initially as an ulcerative proctitis. Since an occult malignancy could not be ruled out by superficial biopsies, the mass was removed by full-thickness transanal excision.

Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence

Obstructed defecation (OD) and fecal incontinence (FI) are challenging clinical problems, which are commonly encountered in the practice of colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists. These disorders socially and psychologically distress patients and greatly impair their quality of life. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes are complex, often incompletely understood and cannot always be determined. As a consequence, many medical, surgical, and behavioral approaches have been described, with no panacea. Over the past decade, advances in an understanding of these disorders together with rational and similar methods of evaluation in anorectal physiology laboratories (ARP), radiology studies, and new surgical techniques have led to promising results. In this brief review, we discuss treatment strategies and recent updates on clinical and therapeutic aspects of obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management

Constipation is a subjective symptom of various pathological conditions. Incidence of constipation fluctuates from 2 to 30% in the general population. Approximately 50% of constipated patients referred to tertiary care centers have obstructed defecation constipation. Constipation of obstructed defecation may be due to mechanical causes or functional disorders of the anorectal region. Mechanical causes are related to morphological abnormalities of the anorectum (megarectum, rectal prolapse, rectocele, enterocele, neoplasms, stenosis). Functional disorders are associated with neurological disorders and dysfunction of the pelvic floor muscles or anorectal muscles (anismus, descending perineum syndrome, Hirschsprung's disease). However, this type of constipation should be differentiated by colonic slow transit constipation which, if coexists, should be managed to a second time. Assessment of patients with severe constipation includes a good history, physical examination and specialized investigations (colonic transit time, anorectal manometry, rectal balloon expulsion test, defecography, electromyography), which contribute to the diagnosis and the differential diagnosis of the cause of the obstructed defecation. Thereby, constipated patients can be given appropriate treatment for their problem, which may be conservative (bulk agents, high-fiber diet or laxatives), biofeedback training or surgery.

Pathophysiology and role of biofeedback therapy in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a behavioral disorder whose pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Likewise, its treatment, particularly the role of biofeedback therapy (BT) is unclear.

AIM

To evaluate anorectal function and morphology and to assess efficacy of BT.

METHODS

Eleven patients (8f) with refractory SRUS underwent symptom assessments, anorectal manometry, defecography, balloon expulsion test, and sigmoidoscopy. Physiological tests were also performed in 15 (11f) healthy controls. Subsequently, SRUS patients underwent biofeedback treatment. Symptoms and manometry were reassessed.

RESULTS

Nine (82%) patients exhibited dyssynergia ( p < 0.001). Rectal sensory thresholds were decreased (p < 0.04). After biofeedback, straining effort and stool frequency decreased ( p < 0.05), and bowel satisfaction score (VAS) improved ( p < 0.001). Digital maneuvers were discontinued by all five patients and bleeding stopped in 56%. The defecation index increased ( p < 0.05), dyssynergia normalized, and balloon expulsion time decreased ( p < 0.05). There was complete healing in 4 (36%), > or =50% healing in 2 (18%), and <50% healing in 4 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SRUS associated with excessive straining, digital disimpaction, rectal hypersensitivity, dyssynergic defecation, and prolonged evacuation. BT may improve symptoms and anorectal function and facilitate healing.

Rectal procidentia: diagnosis and management

Rectal prolapse or procidentia is a common condition with detrimental effects on continence and social function. One of the most devastating complications for patients suffering from this disorder is fecal incontinence. The psychologic trauma these patients experience can be debilitating. This article provides an overview of rectal procidentia, including a review of the symptomatic presentation, etiology, classification, diagnosis, and treatment.

Pelvic outlet obstruction

Despite the wide variety of definitions and descriptions of constipation, ideally, the diagnostic approach should be uniform. The evaluation process should begin with a careful and thorough patient history and physical exam; appropriate efforts should be made to exclude organic causes of constipation. Patients suffering from pelvic outlet obstruction often respond poorly to conservative treatment. Diagnostic tests include intestinal transit studies, anorectal manometry, defecography, balloon expulsion, and anal sphincter electromyography. For many patients constipation is multifactorial and accordingly, so is the treatment. In our opinion the first line of treatment should be based on conservative measures including adequate intake of fluids, dietary fiber supplementation, and laxatives. Biofeedback training should be offered, particularly to patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Surgical management can, in very limited circumstances, be offered only to those patients with disabling symptoms who have failed other standard therapeutic measures.

Rectal intussusception: a study of rectal biomechanics and visceroperception

OBJECTIVES

Rectal intussusception (RI) is a significant cause of morbidity amongst those with a rectal evacuatory disorder. The pathophysiology is unknown, but may involve abnormal biomechanics of the rectal wall similar to that previously demonstrated in patients with overt rectal prolapse (RP). Using an electromechanical barostat, this study aimed to investigate the biomechanics and visceroperception of the rectal wall in patients with RI.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients (12 females, median age 46 yr (range 24-66)) with symptomatic, full-thickness RI were studied. Patients underwent assessment of rectal compliance, visceroperception, adaptive response to isobaric distension at urge threshold, and assessment of the postprandial response. Results were compared with those obtained in 28 asymptomatic volunteers, 10 with RI (6 females, median age 29 yr (range 21-36)) and 18 (9 females, median age 33 yr (range 21-62)) without.

RESULTS

In the absence of the clinical finding of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), patients with symptomatic RI have normal rectal wall biomechanics, as do asymptomatic volunteers with RI (p < 0.05). Patients with the clinical finding of SRUS had reduced compliance and adaptation. In all three groups, there was a linear relationship between rectal pressure and visceroperception. The postprandial contractile response was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RI have normal rectal wall biomechanics. This is in contrast to patients with RP, and suggests that while they may represent different stages of the same disease process, they are physiologically distinct. In patients with RI and SRUS, rectal wall inflammation and fibrosis, perhaps arising secondary to the intussusception, may explain the physiological changes observed.

Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers

Background

Rectal intussusception is a common finding at evacuation proctography in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Little information exists, however, as to whether intussusception morphology differs between patients with evacuatory dysfunction and healthy volunteers.

Methods

Thirty patients (19 women; median age 44 (range 21–76) years) with disordered rectal evacuation, in whom an isolated intussusception was seen on proctography, were studied. Various morphological parameters were measured, and compared with those from 11 asymptomatic controls (six women; median age 30 (range 24–38) years) found, from 31 volunteers, to have rectal intussusception. Intussusceptum thickness greater than 3 mm was designated as full thickness. Intussuscepta impeding evacuation were deemed to be occluding.

Results

Twenty-two patients had full-thickness intussusception, compared with two controls (P = 0·003). Intussusceptum thickness was significantly greater in the symptomatic group (anterior component: P = 0·004; posterior: P = 0·011). Twenty patients in the symptomatic group, but only three subjects in the control group, had a mechanically occluding intussusception (P = 0·043), although only three patients demonstrated evacuatory dynamics outside the normal range.

Conclusion

Rectal intussusception in patients with evacuatory dysfunction is more advanced morphologically than that seen in asymptomatic controls; it is predominantly full thickness in patients and mucosal in controls. However, caution is required when selecting patients for intervention based solely on radiological findings.

Rectal intussusception: characterization of symptomatology

PURPOSE

Rectal intussusception is a common finding at evacuation proctography; however, its significance has been debated. This study was designed to characterize clinically and physiologically a large group of patients with rectal intussusception and test the hypothesis that certain symptoms are predictive of this finding on evacuation proctography.

METHODS

A total of 896 patients underwent evacuation proctography from which three groups were identified: those with isolated rectal intussusception (n = 125), those with isolated rectocele (n = 100), and those with both abnormalities (n = 152). Multivariate analyses were used to identify symptoms predictive of findings by evacuation proctography.

RESULTS

The symptoms of anorectal pain and prolapse were highly predictive of the finding of isolated intussusception over rectocele (odds ratio, 3.6, P = 0.006; odds ratio, 4.9, P < 0.001) or combined intussusception and rectocele (odds ratio, 2.9, P = 0.02; odds ratio, 2.4, P = 0.03). The symptom of "toilet revisiting" was associated with the finding of rectoanal intussusception (odds ratio, 3.55, P = 0.04). Although patients with mechanically obstructing intussuscepta evacuated slower and less completely (P < 0.001) than those with nonobstructing intussuscepta, no symptom was predictive of this finding on evacuation proctography.

CONCLUSIONS

Although certain symptoms are predictive of the finding of rectal intussusception, there is a wide overlap with symptoms of rectocele, another common cause of evacuatory dysfunction. Furthermore, the observation that "obstruction to evacuation" made on proctography had no impact on the incidence of evacuatory symptoms suggests that beyond simply demonstrating the presence of an intussusception, analysis of proctography and subclassifying intussusception morphology seems of little clinical significance, and selection for surgical intervention on the basis of proctographic findings may be illogical.

Argon plasma coagulation of hemorrhagic solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

Solitary ulcer syndrome (SUS) is a rare disorder that may provoke hematochezia. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is used in a wide range of gastrointestinal bleeding. We experienced APC in a patient with a bleeding gigantic SUS: a 64-year-old woman who developed a SUS at 60. After 3 years, recurrent hematochezia, secondary anemia, and rectal pain occurred. Endoscopy revealed a large rectal bleeding ulcer. Moreover, the pain led the patient to assume analgesics. These conditions stimulated us to treat this ulcer with APC within 4 sessions; each session spaced out at 30-day intervals. The patient experienced and maintained the following benefits: (1) resolution of bleeding and secondary anemia after the first session, (2) reduction of ulcer depth, disappearance of pain and analgesic withdrawal at the end of the cycle, (3) almost complete endoscopic healing of the ulcer after 9 months of follow-up. This experience suggests that APC may represent a therapeutic approach for bleeding SUS even if controlled studies are necessary before recommending it as acceptable treatment.

Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of occult rectal prolapse (rectal intussusception) by defecating proctography in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who were seen from September 2000 through August 2001 with defecatory dysfunction and clinical rectoceles underwent single contrast defecating proctography. Radiologists who specialized in gastrointestinal fluoroscopy interpreted the results, which were retrieved from a computerized database. Study Design: Sixty patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Twenty patients (33%) had intussusception; 58 patients (97%) had rectocele; 1 patient (1.7%) had sigmoidocele, and 6 patients (10%) had anismus (paradoxic contraction of the puborectalis).

RESULTS

All but 1 case of intussusception was associated with a rectocele radiographically. Anismus was associated with rectoceles radiographically, except in 1 patient for whom it was the sole finding.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest a 33% incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction. This is highly clinically significant because one third of patients who are examined for defecatory dysfunction and rectocele may require sigmoid resection rectopexy along with other reconstructive procedures to restore pelvic floor function and prevent symptomatic recurrence.

The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications

Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy have revolutionized the clinical management of colonic diseases. Colonoscopy is a highly sensitive and specific test. Colonic diseases often produce characteristic colonoscopic findings, as well as characteristic histologic findings, as identified in colonoscopic biopsy or polypectomy specimens. Colonoscopy is relatively safe, with a low incidence of serious complications, such as colonic perforation, hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary arrest, or sepsis. Colonoscopy is becoming more important clinically because of more widespread use of screening colonoscopy for colon cancer, application of therapeutic colonoscopy, and exciting new technical improvements.

Evaluation and management of rectoceles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As life expectancy increases, the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in general, and rectoceles, in particular, will continue to grow. The objectives of this article are to review the basic anatomy and contributing factors associated with the development of rectoceles and to discuss the appropriate work-up and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes in the current literature stress the importance of not only anatomic restoration, but also quality of life issues regarding visceral and sexual function when performing a rectocele repair. Many recent studies are also evaluating the role of preoperative adjunctive tests to better evaluate women with combined pelvic floor disorders, while others are looking at outcomes data regarding the various surgical approaches to repair a rectocele.

SUMMARY

With significant advancements in pelvic anatomy over the last several decades the surgical approach to treating symptomatic rectoceles has evolved from the traditional posterior colporrhaphy with levator ani plication to the defect specific rectocele repair. While anatomic and overall functional outcomes have improved, one still needs to better define the correlation between defecatory dysfunction and a rectocele.

Surgical Therapy for Colitis Cystica Profunda and Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome

The initial treatment for patients with colitis cystica profunda is aimed at re-education of bowel habits to avoid straining. Patients are instructed to spend the minimum time on the commode. A high-fiber diet with bulk laxatives is recommended. If fiber does not work, polyethylene glycol solutions and surface-active stool softeners such as docusate sodium are tried. Conservative therapy resolves most symptoms. Biofeedback is offered to patients who fail dietary therapy. For patients with associated rectal prolapse, an operation designed to correct the intussusception is considered. For full-thickness prolapse (procidentia) a mucosal resection (Delorme) or perineal proctectomy (Altemeier) is recommended. Surgical treatment of internal (occult) prolapse is problematic. If attempted, a resection and suture rectopexy has the most support. In the absence of procidentia, transanal excision may be used in selected patients. If other measures fail, a mucosal sleeve resection with coloanal pull-through or a diverting colostomy may be considered.

Nonsurgical Therapy for Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome

The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) remains problematic and is less than ideal. Prospective, well-designed studies assessing the efficacy of treatment for SRUS are few; most of the knowledge imparted for treating SRUS is experiential. As such, firm treatment recommendations can not be made. Rather, a conservative, stepwise, individualized approach must be employed. Diagnostic modalities should be incorporated in the management scheme to direct treatment when indicated. Management must include patient reassurance that the underlying lesion is benign, because complete "cures" are uncommon in those with SRUS. The goals of therapy should be discussed with the patient prior to initiating treatment. Although the ultimate goal is macroscopic and microscopic healing, a realistic goal is cessation or minimization of symptoms. We outline a reasonable approach to the management of SRUS. Histologic confirmation of SRUS should prompt a discussion of the presumed pathogenic mechanisms with the patient. Conservative therapy with dietary fiber, bowel retraining, and bulk laxatives should be employed. If symptoms persist, the patient should receive a trial of sucralfate enemas for 6 weeks. Individuals who respond should continue conservative therapy. However, if symptoms persist, defecography can be done to assess for inappropriate puborectalis contraction and occult rectal mucosal prolapse. Patients with inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis can be offered biofeedback. Patients with occult rectal mucosal prolapse can be considered for surgery. However, the risks, benefits, and success rates of surgery should be discussed at length, prior to any procedure being performed. Rectopexy or Delorme's procedure offer the best success rates to date; however, the choice of surgical procedure must take into account the experience of the surgeon and wishes of the patient.