Clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer

Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer?

The Nottingham prognostic index (NPI), based on tumour size in breast, node involvement and Scarff–Bloom–Richardson (SBR) grading, has been shown to constitute a definitive prognostic factor of primary operable breast cancer in the adjuvant setting. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the prognostic value of this index in 163 patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Secondly, we examined the influence on survival of a revised NPI, only based on residual tumour size in breast and SBR grading in 228 patients, and consequently called breast grading index (BGI). The prognostic value of these two indices was also evaluated by replacing the SBR grade with the MSBR grade, a French modified SBR grading; the modified NPI (MNPI) and modified BGI (MBGI) were, respectively, obtained in 153 and 222 patients. At a median follow-up of 9.3 years, survival was significantly related to these four indices (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that MBGI was the only one which retained a prognostic influence on disease-free survival (P<0.02). In conclusion, the ‘amount’ of residual tumour in breast and/or nodes, as defined by NPI and revised indices, confers a determinant prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, inviting an alternative postsurgical treatment for a subgroup of patients with a decreased survival.

International expert panel on the use of primary (preoperative) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: review and recommendations

Primary systemic therapy (PST) represents the standard of care in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. In addition, there is increasing information on PST in operable breast disease that supports the use of PST in routine practice. However, current regimens and techniques vary. To address this concern, a group of representatives from breast cancer clinical research groups in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States reviewed all available data on prospective randomized trials in this setting. Recommendations are made regarding terminology, indications, regimen, diagnosis before treatment, monitoring of efficacy, tumor localization, surgery, pathologic evaluation, and postoperative treatment.

Neoadjuvant docetaxel for operable breast cancer induces a high pathological response and breast-conservation rate

Docetaxel (Taxotere), alone or in combination with other anticancer agents, has proven efficacy in the first- and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This phase II study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with stage II-III primary operable breast cancer. Patients (n=88) were treated with six cycles of docetaxel at 100 mg m(-2) every 21 days, followed by definitive surgery and radiotherapy. After six cycles of docetaxel, the overall clinical response rate was 68.4% (CI 95%: 58.1-78.7%), including 19.0% complete remissions. Breast conservation was achieved in 72.4% of patients. A high pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast was confirmed in 15 patients (19.8% (CI 95%: 10.8-28.8%)) on Chevallier's classification restricted to breast and in 27 patients (35.5% (CI 95%: 24.7-46.3%)) on Sataloff's classification. After a median follow-up of 30.8 months, 19 recurrences were documented with a median time to first recurrence of 17.3 months. Patients with stage III tumours had more recurrences than patients with stage II tumours (P=0.02). The principal toxicity of docetaxel is myelosuppression and 70.5% of patients developed grade III or IV neutropenia with 13.6% developing neutropenic sepsis. There was no case of severe cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia or any other serious adverse events. In conclusion, neoadjuvant docetaxel induces a high pCR and breast-conservation rate. Docetaxel monotherapy is a highly effective regimen that merits formal comparison with currently used combination regimens in a randomised phase III study.

Pathologic changes related to CMF primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. Pathological evaluation of response predicts clinical outcome

The pathologic changes associated to response to primary chemotherapy in a series of 303 operable breast cancers are evaluated and correlated to patients' follow-up (interval free of disease and survival). In our series, the incidence of microscopic changes related to chemotherapy is 43.9%. Tumor replacement by loose fibrosis is the most common pathologic event. In most cases, the intensity of fibrotic change is proportional to the degree of clinical-mammographic reduction of the tumor mass. However, some discrepancies exist in the sense of absence of microscopic changes in cases of well-documented mammographic reduction as well as in cases without clinical reduction but with large areas of chemotherapy-related fibrosis. The presence of pathologic response is significantly associated with better survival rate.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: is this the future?

The idea of using preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer originated from experimental and clinical observations as well as theoretical hypotheses on tumor cell growth and dissemination. Initially, nonrandomized studies demonstrated considerable rates of clinical tumor response, low rates of pathologic complete response (pCR), and increased rates of breast-conserving procedures. However, nonrandomized studies could not address the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival. Similarly, earlier randomized trials were not designed as straightforward comparisons of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy and therefore could not adequately address the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy on outcome. These answers were eventually provided by larger randomized trials that directly compared neoadjuvant with adjuvant chemotherapy, which are reviewed in more detail in this article. Potential advantages and disadvantages of the neoadjuvant approach and surgical considerations in the breast and axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are also discussed. Finally, several recently reported trials of neoadjuvant therapy incorporating newer agents such as taxanes in sequence with anthracycline-containing regimens have shown further increases in pCR rates. Although outcome data are not available yet from these studies, it is hoped that the observed increase in pCR rates will be associated with improved outcome. If the previously observed significant correlation between the achievement of pCR and improved outcome continues to be demonstrated with these newer regimens, it will substantially strengthen the rationale for using neoadjuvant rather that adjuvant chemotherapy in the clinical setting as well as in future research studies.

Efficacy of a primary chemotherapy regimen combining vinorelbine, epirubicin, and methotrexate (VEM) as neoadjuvant treatment in 89 patients with operable breast cancer

PURPOSE

In order to improve the breast conservation rate for noninflammatory operable breast cancer stage II and IIIa, neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), epirubicin, 35 mg/m(2), and methotrexate, 20 mg/m(2), VEM, was administered days 1 and 8 every 28 days for six cycles.

METHODS

From October, 1991 to April, 1996, 89 patients (median age 52 years, range 31-72; 68 stage II and 19 stage IIIa) received 519 cycles (median six) of VEM chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Hematotoxicity was mild (World Health Organization grade 3-4 neutropenia in 28% of cycles for 22 patients, and anemia or thrombocytopenia >grade 2) when it occurred, and there were no toxic deaths. The clinical objective response was 90% (28% complete response and 62% partial response). All patients underwent surgery: 77 (87%) had conservative and 12 (13%) had modified radical mastectomy, and 12 (14%) reached pathological complete response. At December, 2000, with a median follow-up of 86 months (39-100), 13 patients had relapsed, and five had died of metastatic disease. Median disease-free survival was 100 months (8.4 years) and median survival had not yet been reached.

Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome

The aim of this study was to provide a better insight into breast cancer response to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy improves outcome in breast cancer patients. The effect of cytotoxic treatment cannot be predicted for individual patients. Therefore, the identification of tumour characteristics associated with tumour response and outcome is of great clinical interest. We studied 97 patients, who received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour samples were taken prior to and after chemotherapy. We quantified the response to chemotherapy clinically and pathologically and determined histological and molecular tumour characteristics. We assessed changes in the expression of Bcl-2, ER, P53 HER2 and Ki-67. Association with response and outcome was tested for all parameters. The experimental results showed 15 clinical (17%) and three (3%) pathological complete remissions. There were 18 (20%) clinical vs 29 (33%) pathological nonresponders. The expression of most markers was similar before and after chemotherapy. Only Ki-67 was significantly decreased after chemotherapy. Factors correlated with response were: large tumour size, ER negativity, high Ki-67 count and positive P53 status. Tumour response and marker expression did not predict disease-free or overall survival. In conclusion, clinical and pathological response assessments are poorly associated. Proliferation decreases significantly after chemotherapy. ER negativity and a high proliferation index are associated with better response. HER2 status does not predict response, and outcome is not related to tumour response.

Positron emission tomography scanning in gynecologic and breast cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose represents a noninvasive functional imaging modality that is based on metabolic characteristics of malignant tumors. The recent findings of this technique in breast cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and other gynecologic malignancies are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In breast cancer, positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose is more accurate than conventional methods for the staging of distant metastases, enables early assessment of treatment response in patients undergoing primary chemotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy for axillary lymph node staging depends on the tumor load of the lymph nodes. The sensitivity of this technique in detecting primary breast cancer is limited in small breast lesions and invasive lobular cancer. In cervical cancer it is the most accurate noninvasive method for lymph node staging and it can accurately depict recurrent ovarian cancer in patients with elevated CA125 levels. False negative findings in well differentiated adenocarcinoma and borderline lesions as well as false positive findings in benign conditions limit the role of positron emission tomography scanning for the differential diagnosis of adnex tumors.

SUMMARY

Positron emission tomography with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose reveals unique information about tumor metabolism in gynecologic malignancies and breast cancer. This technique is complementary to morphological imaging for primary diagnosis, staging and re-staging. It may become the method of choice for the early assessment of treatment response in breast cancer and the detection of recurrent disease in ovarian cancer. This method, however, cannot replace invasive procedures if microscopic disease is of clinical relevance.

Anti-tumor effects of letrozole

The use of drugs, which inhibit estrogen biosynthesis, is an attractive treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. Estrogen deprivation is most specifically achieved using inhibitors which block the last stage in the biosynthetic sequence, i.e., the conversion of androgens to estrogens by the aromatase enzyme. Recently, a new generation of aromatase inhibitors has been developed. Among these, letrozole (Femara) appears to be the most potent. When given orally in milligram amounts per day to postmenopausal women, the drug almost totally inhibits peripheral aromatase and causes a marked reduction in circulating estrogens to levels that are often undetectable in conventional assays. Similarly, neoadjuvant studies demonstrate that letrozole substantially inhibits aromatase activity in both malignant and nonmalignant breast tissues, and markedly suppresses endogenous estrogens within the breast cancers. These studies also illustrate anti-estrogenic and anti-proliferative effects of letrozole in estrogen receptor (ER)-rich tumors. Thus, tumor expression of progesterone receptors and the cell-cycle marker Ki67 is significantly and consistently reduced with treatment. Additionally, clear pathological responses as evidenced by decreased cellularity and increased fibrosis are seen in the majority of cases. These results translated into clinical benefit in a series of 24 breast cancers treated neoadjuvantly with letrozole (either 2.5 or 10 mg): tumor volume reductions > 25% were observed in 23 women, and > 50% reductions in 18 patients. Pathological and clinical effects are seen much more consistently than with tamoxifen. Thus, in a multicenter randomized trial of letrozole vs. tamoxifen (PE 024), clinical study outcomes were superior for letrozole in comparison with tamoxifen with regard to overall tumor response and an increase in the proportion of patients treated by breast conserving surgery. Letrozole has also been used in advanced breast cancer, both as second-line hormone treatment following tamoxifen failure, and more recently as first-line therapy. Trials of second-line treatment in which letrozole has been compared with either older aromatase inhibitors or progestins have shown equivalent or superior clinical activity and improved tolerability favoring letrozole. In first-line comparison with tamoxifen in metastatic disease, a phase III trial of over 900 postmenopausal women showed letrozole to be significantly better than tamoxifen in terms of overall tumor response rates, clinical benefit, and time to treatment failure. In summary, letrozole is an exceptionally potent and specific endocrine agent. In patients with ER-rich tumors, high rates of pathological and clinical response have been documented, and large phase III trials against established treatments such as tamoxifen and progestin suggest superior (or at least equivalent) clinical efficacy. Letrozole is a drug of immense potential and in the future is likely to occupy a central role in the management of postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer.

Prognostic value of residual node involvement in operable breast cancer after induction chemotherapy

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the influence of axillary disease on patients' survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to assess patient and tumor characteristics associated with post-chemotherapy axillary involvement. After six induction cycles, 277 patients with operable breast cancer (stage II-III) underwent surgery with axillary dissection, followed by radiotherapy (n = 267) or additional chemotherapy (n = 63) and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (n = 138). At a median follow-up of 8.5 years, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed as a function of node involvement. The differences in OS and DFS according to the number of positive nodes were highly statistically significant with a decreased survival associated with the increasing number of nodes (p = 5 x 10(-6) and 9 x 10(-7), respectively). Upon multivariate analysis, the node number after chemotherapy appeared as the most significant prognostic factor (p = 7 x 10(-4) for OS and p = 3 x 10(-5) for DFS). All the other classical prognostic factors were insignificant, except post-chemotherapy Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grading for OS (p = 8 x 10(-4)) and adjuvant hormonotherapy for DFS (p = 1 x 10(-2)). Although constituting a different parameter from primary surgery data, the number of positive nodes after chemotherapy could still remain a valuable prognostic factor at secondary surgery, raising the question for high risk patients of a second non-cross-resistant adjuvant regimen, or high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells support.

Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18

BACKGROUND

Examination was performed on pathologic material from patients enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) protocol B-18, in which the clinical effects of preoperative (preop) and postoperative (postop) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) were compared.

METHODS

Of the total number of 1523 patients, 1234 patients (81%) were in the pathologically evaluable cohort. Six hundred twenty-six patients had been randomized prospectively to receive AC postop and 608 had been randomized to receive AC preop. Preentry diagnosis was made by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and/or Tru-cut biopsy (TC). AC-induced and other pathologic changes were identified, and their relation to pathologic response and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was determined. Frequencies of the number of lymph node metastases, their size, stromal reaction, and extracapsular extension (ECE) were compared in the two treatment groups, as was their correlation with OS and DFS. Survival estimates were based on 9 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Approximately 13% of primary breast carcinoma cases exhibited both a clinical complete response (cCR) and a pathologic complete response (absence of invasive tumor [pCR]) to preop AC. An additional 7% of patients exhibited a pCR in the absence of a cCR. A pCR occurred in 38% of those patients determined to have achieved a cCR. Poor nuclear grade of the tumor cells in the pre-entry FNA and/or TC specimens significantly predicted a pCR. Patients with the latter exhibited a better OS and DFS compared with those with a pathologic partial response (presence of sparse invasive tumor [pPR]) or no pathologic response (pNR). Epithelial alterations considered to be induced in tumors by preop AC were comprised of types 1 and 2 giant cells with meganuclei, apocrine metaplasia, and cytoplasmic vacuolation. They had a high degree of specificity (range, 86-99%) but a low sensitivity (range, 7-38%). All were predictive of a pPR and were found to be related adversely to OS and DFS. A fibrous stromal reaction noted in tumors or their putative sites in the preop group was found to have only modest degrees of specificity (63%) and sensitivity (74%). Moderate/marked sclerosis of basement membranes of the ductal and ductular elements of the terminal ductolobular unit (TDLU) was significantly more frequent in nontumor-bearing areas of breasts from patients in the preop treatment group compared with those in the postop treatment group (67% vs. 48%; P < 0.0001). The degrees of change in the TDLU in patients in the postop treatment group were found to be unrelated to age. Lymphatic tumor extension in the primary tumor, as well as a positive lymph node status, were less frequent in the preop treatment group compared with the postop treatment group. The OS and DFS were nearly identical in both treatment groups, being 69% and 55% and 70% and 53% in the preop and postop treatment groups, respectively, at 9 years. A fibrous stromal response to lymph node metastases was found to be significant for DFS but not OS. ECE was similar in both groups (55% vs. 48%; P = 0.12). Only 1% of ECE was found to be related to axillary failure in both treatment arms combined. There was no significant difference with regard to the parameters of survival for patients in the postop treatment group whose lymph nodes contained micrometastases (< 2.0 mm) or mini micrometastases (< 1.0 mm) (the latter detected immunohistochemically with anticytokeratin), and a true-negative lymph node status (not immunohistochemically converted to positive). Conversely, there was no apparent difference with regard to OS in preop treated patients with lymph node micrometastases, mini micrometastases, and macrometastases (P = 0.19). Those with mini micrometastases had a significantly worse OS compared with those with a true-negative lymph node status (P = 0.0007). DFS remained worse for patients in that treatment group with micrometastases and mini micrometastases compared with those with negative lymph nodes, although it was better than that for patients with macrometastases (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor nuclear grade of tumor cells in the preentry FNA or TC specimens in the preop group was predictive of a pCR. AC-induced meganuclear giant cells and apocrine changes and nuclear and histologic grades of the primary tumors also were found to be prognostically significant in patients in the preop treatment group, and the latter two variables were found to be significant for those patients in the postop treatment group. No evidence was found to support the need for axillary lymph node radiation for ECE of lymph node metastases. Extended pathologic or immunohistochemical procedures also appear to be unnecessary for the detection of lymph node mini micrometastases, at least when traditional postop chemotherapy is used. The adverse relation between such small metastases and OS and DFS after preop AC appears to be related to the timing of the chemotherapy administration rather than any pathobiologic reasons.

Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancers produces histologically evaluable changes and frequently reduces the size of the primary tumor. Local clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy may correlate with response of distant metastases. Therefore, clinical or pathological factors, which predict or assess response to treatment, may predict outcome after consideration for initial extent of disease.

METHODS

To identify pretreatment characteristics of locally advanced breast cancers which predict clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as survival and to assess the utility of postoperative histologic changes, we retrospectively studied one hundred forty-four patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 1975 and July 1996. Patients were identified through pathology records of the Mount Sinai Medical Center and via one of the author's clinical databases. Pathologic and clinical responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were correlated with survival. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify variables most significantly related to clinical response and pathologic axillary lymph node involvement.

RESULTS

Complete clinical response with no palpable tumor was noted in 7/86 patients (8%) and complete pathologic response was achieved in 18/138 patients (13%). Both clinical (P = 0.038) and pathologic response (P = 0.011) were related to tumor size at the time of diagnosis: smaller tumors were more likely to respond to chemotherapy than larger tumors. Histologic evidence of chemotherapeutic effect, i.e., cytoplasmic vacuolization, change in the number of mitoses and localized fibrosis in lymph nodes did not correlate with clinical or pathologically measured response. Clinical and pathologic response was not associated with age, histology, differentiation, or type of chemotherapy. No residual tumor was found in the axillary nodes of 27% (37) of the patients. Age and complete pathologic response were the only variables significantly related to pathologic nodal status. Eighty-four percent of the 61 patients under 50 years of age had nodal involvement compared to 65% of older patients (P = 0.014). Fifty percent of complete pathologic responders had positive axillary lymph nodes compared to 76% of patients who did not have a complete pathologic response (P = 0.020). Distant disease-free (P = 0.039) and overall survival (P = 0.035) were related to the number of involved axillary lymph nodes. After consideration for pathologic lymph node status, no other variable was significantly related to distant disease-free or overall survival in multivariate analysis. No variable was significantly related to local disease-free survival. Age, clinical tumor size, clinical lymph node status, clinical response, type of chemotherapy, histology, differentiation, chemotherapy effects on primary tumor and lymph nodes, decline in the number of mitoses, and degree of fibrosis in nodes were not predictive of distant recurrence or overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancers found little evidence that measurable clinical or pathologic changes attributable to chemotherapy predicted survival. Axillary lymph node status, associated with young age, was the most important prognostic indicator in these patients.

Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer

Only a few papers have been published concerning the incidence and outcome of patients with a pathological complete response after cytotoxic treatment in breast cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients found to have a pathological complete response in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Our goal was also to determine whether the residual pathological size of the tumour in breast could be correlated with pathological node status. Between 1982 and 2000, 451 consecutive patients were registered into five prospective phase II trials. After six cycles, 396 patients underwent surgery with axillary dissection for 277 patients (69.9%). Pathological response was evaluated according to the Chevallier's classification. At a median follow-up of 8 years, survival was analysed as a function of pathological response. A pathological complete response rate was obtained in 60 patients (15.2%) after induction chemotherapy. Breast tumour persistence was significantly related to positive axillary nodes (P=5.10(-6)). At 15 years, overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher in the group who had a pathological complete response than in the group who had less than a pathological complete response (P=0.047 and P=0.024, respectively). In the absence of pathological complete response and furthermore when there is a notable remaining pathological disease, axillary dissection is still important to determine a major prognostic factor and subsequently, a second non cross resistant adjuvant regimen or high dose chemotherapy could lead to a survival benefit.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant (NA) docetaxel (DOC) with anthracycline-based therapy and determine the efficacy of NA DOC in patients with breast cancer initially failing to respond to anthracycline-based NA chemotherapy (CT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer received four pulses of cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.5 mg/m(2), and prednisolone 40 mg (4 x CVAP) for 5 days. Clinical tumor response was assessed. Those who responded (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) were randomized to receive further 4 x CVAP or 4 x DOC (100 mg/m(2)). All nonresponders received 4 x DOC.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-two patients were enrolled; 145 patients completed eight cycles of NA CT. One hundred two patients (66%) achieved a clinical response (PR or CR) after 4 x CVAP. After randomization, 50 patients received 4 x CVAP and 47 patients received 4 x DOC. In patients who received eight cycles of CT, the clinical CR (cCR) and clinical PR (cPR) (94% v 66%) and pathologic CR (pCR) (34% v 16%) response rates were higher (P =.001 and P =.04) in those who received further DOC. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated cCR and cPR (85% v 64%; P =.03) and pCR (31% v 15%; P =.06). Axillary lymph node examination revealed residual tumor in 33% of patients who received 8 x CVAP and 38% of patients who received further DOC. In patients who failed to respond to the initial CVAP, 4 x DOC resulted in a cCR and cPR rate of 55% and a pCR rate of 2%. Forty-four percent of these patients had residual tumor within axillary lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

NA DOC resulted in substantial improvement in responses to DOC.

Estrogen-receptor-directed neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: results of a randomised trial using formestane and methotrexate, mitozantrone and mitomycin C (MMM) chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

We wanted to determine whether neoadjuvant systemic chemoendocrine therapy guided by the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the primary breast cancer, followed by conventional surgery and/or radiotherapy, reduces local and distant recurrence and improves survival compared with adjuvant treatment given conventionally postoperatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ten patients with primary breast cancer (T1-T4, N0, N1-2) were randomised to receive treatment with neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy or conventional post-operative chemoendocrine therapy. Systemic therapy was based on the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the primary tumour obtained by trucut core biopsy. ER-negative patients received MMM chemotherapy (methotrexate (30 mg/m2), mitozantrone (7 mg/m2) and mitomycin (7 mg/m2) three-weekly for three months and ER-positive patients who were premenopausal received goserelin (3.75 mg monthly), and post menopausal women formestane (250 mg every two weeks) over three months.

RESULTS

With a minimum of five years follow-up, there is no evidence of any survival benefit from the pretreatment neoadjuvant therapy regimen, with five year overall survival being 79% +/- 4.7% (neoadjuvant) and 87% +/- 3.4% (adjuvant). Similarly, there was no apparent benefit in terms of disease-free survival. There was, however, a significant reduction in the incidence of distant metastases in responders (4 of 51; 8%) compared with non-responders (17 of 49; 35%) (P < 0.01). There was a reduction in the need for surgery in responding patients with T1 and T2 tumours, since 10 of 74 (14%) had no detectable residual tumour, without any apparent increase in the risk of local or distant recurrence.

CONCLUSION

In this study neoadjuvant treatment with endocrine or chemotherapy provided no obvious survival benefit to women with breast cancer. However, it does allow avoidance of surgery in some cases. Also, the patients whose tumours respond to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have a lower incidence of distant metastases after five year follow-up compared to those whose tumours fail to respond.

Hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization after induction chemotherapy and GM-CSF plus G-CSF in breast cancer

In order to determine the effect of GM-CSF plus G-CSF in combination in breast cancer patients receiving an effective induction regimen, we compared hematological recovery and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization according to colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support. Forty-three breast cancer patients were treated by TNCF (THP-doxorubicin, vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, D1 to D4) with CSF support: 11 patients received GM-CSF (D5 to D14); 16 patients G-CSF (D5 to D14) and 16 patients GM-CSF (D5-D14) plus G-CSF (D10-D14). Between two subsequent cycles, progenitor cells were assessed daily, from D13 to D17. The WBC count was similar for patients receiving G-CSF alone or GM-CSF plus G-CSF, but significantly greater than that of patients receiving GM-CSF alone (P<0.001). The GM-CSF plus G-CSF combination led to better PBPC mobilization, with significantly different kinetics (P<0.001) and optimal mean values of CFU-GM, CD34+ cells and cells in cycle, at D15 compared to those obtained with G-CSF or GM-CSF alone. The significantly greater PBPC mobilization obtained with a CSF combination by D15 could be of value for PBPC collection and therapeutic reinjection after high-dose chemotherapies.

Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer

PURPOSE

To address the role of positron emission tomography (PET) using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to monitor primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Quantification of regional FDG uptake of the breast acquired after the first and second courses of chemotherapy was compared with the baseline scan in 22 patients with a total of 24 breast carcinomas. To evaluate the predictive value of PET imaging, histopathologic response after completion of chemotherapy classified as gross residual disease (GRD) or minimal residual disease (MRD) served as the gold standard.

RESULTS

Significant differences in tracer uptake between nonresponding tumors (GRD) and responding lesions (MRD) were observed (P <.05) as early as after the first course of chemotherapy. Tracer uptake showed little change in tumors with GRD found later in pathologic analysis but decreased sharply to the background level in most tumors with MRD. After the first course, all responders were correctly identified (sensitivity 100%, specificity 85%) by a standardized uptake value decrease below 55% of the baseline scan. At this threshold, histopathologic response could be predicted with an accuracy of 88% and 91% after the first and second courses of therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing primary chemotherapy, FDG-PET differentiates responders from nonresponders early in the course of therapy. This may help improve patient management by avoiding ineffective chemotherapy and supporting the decision to continue dose-intensive preoperative chemotherapy in responding patients.

Does the degree of cell lesion in breast cancer after inductive chemotherapy have any prognostic value?

During 1991 and 1992, 77 patients with breast cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy using the CMFV and FAC protocols at the Lublin Oncological Centre. The degree of cancer cell damage in the specimens obtained postoperatively was evaluated by microscopy. Complete or substantial damage of neoplastic cells was found in 29% of the cases; whereas minimal to no damage was found in 71% of specimens. After assessing the 5-year survival periods of our patients in relation to the degree of cancer cell damage after induction chemotherapy, a statistically significant correlation was noted. Five-year survival without cancer symptoms was observed in 64% of cases in which the cell damage was estimated as considerable, and only in 34% in which the damage was slight or not notable. A much weaker correlation was observed between the degree of breast cancer cell damage after inductive chemotherapy and clinical response.

Prediction of response to primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer

The use of primary systemic cytotoxics leads to a high remission rate in patients with breast cancer. Response was identified as an important variable associated with survival. Thus, features which predict response, are potentially relevant for planning treatments and improving survival. Retrospectively, we investigated several histopathological features (expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors, Mib1, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, and p53) prior to two programmes of either sequential preoperative chemotherapy (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) and radiotherapy (Group A), or preoperative chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and vinorelbine) alone (Group B) in patients with operable breast cancer. After three courses, patients with a partial or complete response were given a further three courses, which was followed for patients in Group A by radiotherapy 50 Gy plus a boost of 10 Gy. All patients were submitted to surgery after completion of preoperative treatment and pathology material from 73 patients (median age, 49 years, range, 30-70; performance status, 0-1; 68 T2, 5 T3) was obtained. The overall response rate according to radiological and clinical evaluation was 59% (68% for Group A and 49% for Group B). 12 of 14 patients with p53-positive tumours and 31 of 59 with p53-negative tumours responded (P = 0.04). 6 of 7 patients with elevated c-erbB-2 had a response compared with 37 of 66 patients in the group with c-erbB-2 negative tumours (P = 0.03). Mib1 expression decreased substantially (> or = 50%) in 25 patients during treatment, of whom 20 responded compared with 21 of 48 patients with a lower decrease (P = 0.04). Response was observed in 28 of 37 patients with high baseline Mib1 (> 20%) and in 15 of 36 patients in the low Mib1 group (P = 0.05). Finally, 32 of 44 tumours with low expression of progesterone receptors responded compared with 11 of 29 tumours with high receptors expression (P = 0.05). These markers might be useful for tailoring primary and postsurgical systemic treatments.

Pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer

Primary systemic treatment of breast cancer with cytotoxics yields a high response rate and allows conservative surgical procedures in bulky tumours. In order to maximise local control of disease, two innovations were introduced in a pilot study. The first was to identify the good responders after three cycles of chemotherapy and to treat them with three additional cycles. The second was to also give this group of patients a full dose of radiotherapy before surgery with the aim of verifying the rate of pathological complete remissions in view of a possible treatment of breast primary with chemoradiotherapy only. Patients were treated with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 both intravenously on day 1, every 21 days for three courses. Partial or complete responders received three more courses followed by radiotherapy (50 Gy plus a 10 Gy boost). The others underwent immediate surgery. A total of 32 patients (median age, 50 years; range 28-69 years); performance status, 0-1; T2 22, T3 8, T4 2) were enrolled and were evaluable for response and side-effects. 9 patients had only three cycles of chemotherapy due to absence of response and 23 patients had six cycles of chemotherapy. Overall, 7 patients had a complete remission, 16 a partial remission and 9 had stable disease, for an overall response rate of 72% (95% confidence interval 53-86%). In the group of patients that completed the programme, two complete pathological remissions were observed and 5 patients had only microfoci of tumour. No toxic death or grade III-IV toxicities were observed. Mild or moderate side-effects included mucositis, nausea/vomiting and leucopenia. In conclusion, our results indicate that the addition of radiotherapy to pre-operative chemotherapy did not significantly enhance the incidence of pathological complete remissions. New primary treatment approaches should be explored in this subset of patients in order to improve outcome.

Primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: correlation between tumor response and patient outcome

This study focused on the correlation between tumor response and patient outcome in 329 breast cancers treated with primary chemotherapy. There were 141 stage IIIB tumors, including 109 inflammatory carcinomas. Other malignancies (34 IIIA, 99 IIB, 55 IIA) were operable but considered to be too large (> 3 cm) for conservative surgery and received primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy. All received the AVCF regimen, comprising 4-week cycles of doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) day 1, vincristine (1 mg/m2) day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 400 mg/m2) days 2 through 5, cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) days 2 through 5. In 189 cases, methotrexate (15 mg/m2) was added at day 2 and day 3. Patients received 6 cycles, then underwent locoregional treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, or both) according to tumor regression. The response rate was assessed by clinical, mammographic, and echographic examinations: a 50% rate of objective responses were noted, of which 15% were complete responses (tumor shrinkage allowed breast conservation in 68% of patients who had stages II or IIIA). For the whole population studied, median follow-up was 111 months (range, 60- 196). One hundred fifty-seven patients had disease relapse (48 local, 14 contralateral, 95 distant). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed an increased 10-year overall survival for patients in complete response, as compared with noncomplete response: 70% versus 50% (p < 0.03). Complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems a good prognostic factor.