Cediranib in patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma (CASPS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial

Assessment of Efficiency and Safety of Apatinib in Advanced Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Previous studies, both in vitro and in vivo, have established that apatinib has anti-tumor properties. However, insufficient empirical evidence of the efficacy and safety of apatinib has been published for bone and soft tissue sarcoma, the reported results differing widely. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib for the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Methods

Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Vip (China), Cnki (China), Wanfang (China), and CBM (China) databases and literature from conferences were searched for studies of apatinib for the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas, published from the inception of each database to Sep 1, 2020, without language restrictions. Primary outcomes were efficacy and toxicity of apatinib for the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcoma, including treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of adverse events. After extraction of data and methodological quality evaluation, random or fixed-effects models, as appropriate, were selected to calculate pooled effect estimates using R software (Version 3.4.1).

Results

A total of 21 studies with 827 participants were included in the present meta-analysis. The mean MINORS score was 10.48 ± 1.75 (range: 7-13), indicating evidence of moderate quality. Pooled outcomes indicated that overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 23.85% (95% CI: 18.47%-30.21%) and 79.16% (95% CI: 73.78%-83.68%), respectively. Median PFS ranged from 3.5 to 13.1 months, with a mean of 7.08 ± 2.98 months. Furthermore, the rates of PFS (PFR) after 1, 6, and 12 months were 99.31%, 44.90%, and 14.31%, respectively. Drug-related toxicity appears to be common in patients administered apatinib, for which hand-foot syndrome (41.13%), hypertension (36.15%), and fatigue (20.52%) ranked the top three most common adverse events. However, the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was relatively low and manageable.

Conclusions

Based on the best evidence currently available, apatinib demonstrates promising clinical efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma, although additional high-quality clinical studies are required to further define its properties and toxicity.

Incorporating the Patient Voice in Sarcoma Research: How Can We Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in This Heterogeneous Group of Patients? A Study Protocol

Sarcomas comprise 1% of adult tumors and are very heterogeneous. Long-lasting and cumulative treatment side-effects detract from the (progression-free) survival benefit of treatment. Therefore, it is important to assess treatment effectiveness in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as well. However, questionnaires capturing the unique issues of sarcoma patients are currently lacking. Given the heterogeneity of the disease, the development of such an instrument may be challenging. The study aims to (1) develop an exhaustive list of all HRQoL issues relevant to sarcoma patients and determine content validity; (2) determine a strategy for HRQoL measurement in sarcoma patients. We will conduct an international, multicenter, mixed-methods study (registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04071704) among bone or soft tissue sarcoma patients ≥18 years, using EORTC Quality of Life Group questionnaire development guidelines. First, an exhaustive list of HRQoL issues will be generated, derived from literature and patient (n = 154) and healthcare professional (HCP) interviews (n = 30). Subsequently, another group of sarcoma patients (n = 475) and HCPs (n = 30) will be asked to rate and prioritize the issues. Responses will be analyzed by priority, prevalence and range of responses for each item. The outcome will be a framework for tailored HRQoL measurement in sarcoma patients, taking into account sociodemographic and clinical variables.

Anti-Angiogenic Agents in Management of Sarcoma Patients: Overview of Published Trials

We reviewed all fully published clinical trials assessing anti-angiogenic agents in sarcoma patients (last issue, January 13, 2020). Anti-angiogenic macromolecules (e.g., bevacizumab or ombrabulin) provide disappointing results. Many multikinase inhibitors have been assessed with non-randomized phase II trials with limited samples and without stratification according to histological subtypes, therefore interpretation of such trials is very challenging. On the contrary, pazopanib, regorafenib, and sorafenib have been assessed using double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase II or phase III trials. Compared to placebo, sorafenib demonstrates activity in desmoid-type fibromatosis patients. Based on results of phase 3 trial, pazopanib had obtained approval for treatment of pretreated non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. Regorafenib is currently assessed in several clinical settings and provides significant improvement of progression-free survival in pre-treated non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma and in advanced pretreated osteosarcoma. Multikinase inhibitors are a breakthrough in sarcoma management. Many trials are ongoing. Nevertheless, predictive factors are still missing.

Nivolumab and sunitinib combination in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas exhibit low expression of factors related to immune response, which could explain the modest activity of PD-1 inhibitors. A potential strategy to convert a cold into an inflamed microenvironment lies on a combination therapy. As tumor angiogenesis promotes immunosuppression, we designed a phase Ib/II trial to test the double inhibition of angiogenesis (sunitinib) and PD-1/PD-L1 axis (nivolumab).

METHODS

This single-arm, phase Ib/II trial enrolled adult patients with selected subtypes of sarcoma. Phase Ib established two dose levels: level 0 with sunitinib 37.5 mg daily from day 1, plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously on day 15, and then every 2 weeks; and level -1 with sunitinib 37.5 mg on the first 14 days (induction) and then 25 mg per day plus nivolumab on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended dose for phase II (phase I) and the 6-month progression-free survival rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (phase II).

RESULTS

From May 2017 to April 2019, 68 patients were enrolled: 16 in phase Ib and 52 in phase II. The recommended dose of sunitinib for phase II was 37.5 mg as induction and then 25 mg in combination with nivolumab. After a median follow-up of 17 months (4-26), the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 48% (95% CI 41% to 55%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events included transaminitis (17.3%) and neutropenia (11.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib plus nivolumab is an active scheme with manageable toxicity in the treatment of selected patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with almost half of patients free of progression at 6 months.Trial registration number NCT03277924.

iCREATE: imaging features of primary and metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma from the EORTC CREATE study

Background

Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, slow-growing, but highly vascular soft tissue sarcoma, characterised by a high rate of metastases at presentation. Although imaging features of the primary are well described, less detail is available on the imaging pattern of metastatic ASPS. The EORTC 90101 (CREATE) study assessed the efficacy of Crizotinib in patients with metastatic ASPS and presents a unique opportunity to describe the imaging phenotype of primary and metastatic ASPS, based on prospectively collected imaging.

Methods

A retrospective review of the staging CT scans of 32 patients with ASPS from the CREATE study was undertaken and the imaging features of primary and metastatic disease were assessed.

Results

Imaging of the primary tumour was available in 7/32 cases (28%). All primary tumours demonstrated marked vascularity with prominent feeding vessels (7/7, 100%). The most frequent sites of metastases included lung (30/32, 94%), nodal (7/32, 22%), bone (5/32, 16%) and muscle/subcutaneous (5/32, 16%). Features of hypervascularity were identified at all sites, more appreciable in the lungs, with feeding vessels frequently demonstrated in pulmonary metastases (21/32, 66%).

Conclusion

Analysis of imaging from the CREATE cohort of patients with metastatic ASPS demonstrates that metastases from ASPS are predominantly hypervascular and demonstrate feeding vessels comparable to primary ASPS, suggesting potential sensitivity of this rare sarcoma for antivascular/antiangiogenic treatment approaches.

Sarcomas: Immune biomarker expression and checkpoint inhibitor trials

Sarcomas are a heterogenous group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 100 subtypes. Current chemotherapy for all but a very few subtypes has limited efficacy, resulting in 5-year relative survival rates of 16% for metastatic patients. While sarcomas have often been regarded as an "immune cold" tumor category, recent biomarker studies have confirmed a great deal of immune heterogeneity across sarcoma subtypes. Reports from the first generation of clinical trials treating sarcomas with immunotherapy demonstrate a few positive responses, supporting efforts to stratify patients to optimize response rates. This review summarizes recent advances in knowledge around immune biomarker expression in sarcomas, the potential use of new technologies to complement these study results, and clinical trials particularly of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in sarcomas. Each of the immune biomarkers assessed was reviewed for subtype-specific expression patterns and correlation with prognosis. Overall, there is extensive heterogeneity of immune biomarker presence across sarcoma subtypes, and no consensus on the prognostic effect of these biomarkers. New technologies such as multiplex immunohistochemistry and high plex in situ profiling may offer more insights into the sarcoma microenvironment. To date, clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy have not shown compelling clinical benefits. Combination therapy with dual checkpoint inhibitors or in combinations with other agents has yielded more promising results in dedifferentiated liposarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, angiosarcoma and alveolar soft-part sarcoma. Better understanding of the sarcoma immune status through biomarkers may help decipher the reasons behind differential responses to immunotherapy.

Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Osteosarcoma Treatment: Which Is the Key Target?

Recent clinical trials have shown several multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to be effective in the treatment of osteosarcoma. However, these TKIs have a number of targets, and it is yet unclear which of these targets has a key role in osteosarcoma treatment. In this review, we first summarize the TKIs that were studied in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further, we compare and discuss the targets of these TKIs. We found that TKIs with promising therapeutic effect for osteosarcoma include apatinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and sorafenib. The key targets for osteosarcoma treatment may include VEGFRs and RET. The receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) MET, IGF-1R, AXL, PDGFRs, KIT, and FGFRs might be relevant but unimportant targets for osteosarcoma treatment. Inhibition of one type of RTK for the treatment of osteosarcoma is not effective. It is necessary to inhibit several relevant RTKs simultaneously to achieve a breakthrough in osteosarcoma treatment. This review provides comprehensive information on TKI targets relevant in osteosarcoma treatment, and it will be useful for further research in this field.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Options in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Due to the heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), the choice of the proper perioperative treatment regimen is challenging. Neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to several advantages, particularly in patients with locally advanced disease. The number of available neoadjuvant modalities is growing continuously. We may consider radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiosensitizers, hyperthermia, and their combinations. This review discusses possible neoadjuvant treatment options in STS with an emphasis on available evidence, indications for each treatment type, and related risks. Finally, we summarize current recommendations of the STS neoadjuvant therapy response assessment.

Characterization of alveolar soft part sarcoma using a large national database

BACKGROUND

Alveolar soft part sarcoma is a rare, histologic subtype of soft tissue sarcoma that remains poorly defined. We aimed to describe patient characteristics and treatment patterns and to examine factors associated with survival for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma.

METHODS

After identifying patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma in the National Cancer Database, we recorded their clinicopathologic characteristics. Univariable log-rank survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were employed. For context, survival comparisons were included for patients with other sarcoma subtypes.

RESULTS

Overall, 293 patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma were identified. Interestingly, patients with head and neck tumors were least likely to present with distant disease (40%, P = .025). The majority of patients underwent resection (n = 183, 63%). Among those, no predictors of lesser survival were identified other than the presence of metastases (hazard ratio 6.04, P ≤ .001). Patients with stage IV alveolar soft part sarcoma who underwent resections experienced improved survival relative to similar patients with more common subtypes of soft tissue sarcomas (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

Alveolar soft part sarcoma is exceedingly rare, and patients often present with metastases. Primary tumors can occur anywhere in the body, and location impacts the rates of metastases at presentation. Resection is associated with a favorable survival advantage when compared to other, more common histologic subtypes of soft tissue sarcomas.

Phase II trial of pazopanib in patients with metastatic or unresectable chemoresistant sarcomas: A Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group study

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), epithelioid sarcoma (ES), and clear cell sarcoma (CCS) are known to be chemoresistant tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pazopanib on these chemoresistant tumors. This study is designed as a single‐arm, multicenter, investigator‐initiated phase II trial. Patient enrollment was undertaken between July 2016 and August 2018 at 10 hospitals participating in the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. The primary end‐point is the CBR (CBR, including complete or partial response and stable disease) at 12 weeks after treatment with pazopanib according to RECIST. Eight patients were enrolled within the period. The histological subtypes were 5 ASPS, 2 ES, and 1 CCS. The median follow‐up period was 22.2 (range, 4.9‐24.9) months. All patients initially received pazopanib 800 mg once daily. The CBRs were 87.5% (7 of 8) and 75.0% (6 of 8) according to RECIST and Choi criteria at 12 weeks after pazopanib treatment, respectively. The CBRs at 12 weeks according to RECIST were 80.0%, 100.0%, and 100.0% in ASPS, ES, and CCS, respectively. Partial response was observed in 1 ASPS according to RECIST and 3 ASPS and 1 ES according to Choi criteria at 12 weeks after pazopanib treatment. This study documented antitumor activity of pazopanib, especially in ASPS. These results support the frontline use of pazopanib for ASPS. Prospective data collection is desired using both RECIST and Choi criteria for these rare chemoresistant tumors.

Establishment and characterization of NCC-ASPS1-C1: a novel patient-derived cell line of alveolar soft-part sarcoma

Alveolar soft-part sarcoma is a mesenchymal malignancy characterized by the rearrangement of ASPSCR1 and TFE3 and a histologically distinctive pseudoalveolar pattern. Although alveolar soft-part sarcoma takes an indolent course, its long-term prognosis is poor because of late distant metastases. Currently, curative treatments have not been found for alveolar soft-part sarcoma, and hence, a novel therapeutic strategy has long been required. Patient-derived cell lines comprise an important tool for basic and preclinical research. However, few cell lines from alveolar soft-part sarcoma have been reported in the literature because it is an extremely rare malignancy, accounting for less than 1% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. This study aimed to establish a novel alveolar soft-part sarcoma cell line. Using surgically-resected tumor tissue of alveolar soft-part sarcoma, we successfully established a cell line and named it NCC-ASPS1-C1. The NCC-ASPS1-C1 cells harbored an ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion gene and exhibited slow growth, and spheroid formation. On the other hand, NCC-ASPS1-C1 did not show the capability of invasion. We screened the antiproliferative effects of 195 anticancer agents, including Food and Drug Administration-approved anticancer drugs. We found that the MET inhibitor tivantinib and multi-kinase inhibitor orantinib inhibited the proliferation of NCC-ASPS1-C1 cells. The clinical utility and molecular mechanisms of antitumor effects of these drugs are worth investigating in the further studies, and NCC-ASPS1-C1 cells will be a useful tool for the in vitro study of alveolar soft-part sarcoma.

Real-World Outcomes of Pazopanib Treatment in Korean Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib is the only tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who have received prior chemotherapy, but there have been limited real-world data on pazopanib for the treatment of advanced STS.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of pazopanib in patients with multiple histologic STS types in real-world settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of Korean patients with advanced STS treated with pazopanib between 2008 and 2019. Outcomes of interest included treatment response, survival according to histologic subtypes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The analysis included 347 STS patients. The disease control rate for all pazopanib-treated patients was 54.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.5-60.0); 54 patients (15.6%) achieved a partial response and 136 (39.2%) had stable disease. Patients with alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS; 90%), solitary fibrous tumor (SFT; 88.2%), synovial sarcoma (66.7%), leiomyosarcoma (61.1%), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (59.6%) showed higher disease control rates than those with other STS subtypes. Overall, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.3 months (95% CI 4.5-6.0) and 12 months (95% CI 10-14), respectively. Noticeable survival outcomes occurred in patients with ASPS and SFT, with a median PFS of 24.5 (95% CI 2.5-30.0) and 13.0 (95% CI 3.0-21.3) months, respectively. The median OS of patients with ASPS and SFT was 48 (95% CI 17-52) and 32 (95% CI 19-66) months, respectively. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 170 patients (49.0%) but were not life-threatening.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world data analysis showed acceptable efficacy and tolerability of pazopanib in patients pretreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced STS, with favorable treatment outcomes for ASPS and SFT.

Immunotherapy in sarcoma: combinations or single agents? In whom?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

First clinical trials investigating immune check point (ICP) inhibitors in patients with sarcoma, regardless histological or molecular subtypes did not demonstrate any prolonged benefit. To maximize the chance of benefit from immunotherapy, recent strategies explore the combination of treatments and aim to improve identification of responsive histological subtypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination of several ICP inhibitors tends to increase toxicity and efficacy. Mechanisms of synergistic action remain unclear. Combination of ICP blockade with tyrosine kinase inhibitor increases efficacy in specific histological subtypes already identified as sensitive to each drug separately. The role of the combination is not established yet. Several ongoing trials assess the combination of ICP blockade with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. ICP blockade seems highly effective in some selected histological subtypes like alveolar soft part sarcoma, chordoma, malignant rhabdoid tumor, and angiosarcoma. Encouraging preliminary results need to be confirmed in larger cohorts and biological mechanisms that sustain this efficacy should be further explored. Adoptive cell therapy seems very promising in synovialosarcoma.

SUMMARY

Significant efforts are underway to efficiently develop immunotherapy in patients with sarcoma and better characterize patients who would benefit the most from it.

A durable complete response to immunotherapy in a patient with metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Recent years have brought the dynamic development of a new method of cancer treatment: immunotherapy. Monoclonal antibodies blocking the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) are now widely used in the treatment of several malignancies: melanoma, lung, head and neck cancer, among others. The therapeutic benefit of immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has not yet been proven. The exception is results obtained in the treatment of a rare STS subtype alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS).

CASE REPORT

We describe a case of a man with a diagnosis of metastatic ASPS in whom the use of immunotherapy with nivolumab resulted in excellent long-term clinical benefit and a pathologically confirmed complete response.

CONCLUSION

There are strong indications that immunotherapy may become the next important treatment method of ASPS.

Novel therapeutic options for alveolar soft part sarcoma: antiangiogenic therapy, immunotherapy and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) represent 0.5% of sarcomas, defining a rarest among rare malignancies. It affects young adults, displaying slow-growing mass of the thigh, head and neck, and trunk. Although quite indolent, a majority of cases displays an advanced disease with lung bone or central nervous system metastasis. Complete surgery is the cornerstone of localized ASPS, and advanced diseases poorly respond to chemotherapy. Here discuss recent progress in molecular characterization of ASPS and future prospects of therapeutic approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

ASPS is characterized by a specific oncogenic translocation ASPSCR1-TFE3 that induce hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) overexpression, angiogenesis, and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. These specific biological features have encouraged the successful exploration of MET inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs, and immunotherapy. We reviewed the main tracks of ASPS biology and recent insights from targeted therapies is ASPS mainly driven tyrosine kinase inhibitors (especially antiangiogenics), immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and their combinations.

SUMMARY

Overall, antiangiogenics and anti Programmed cell death 1/Programmed cell death ligand 1 therapies showed a significant activity in ASPS that warrants additional investigation through randomized trials to validate those results and through ancillary biological studies to better understand resistance mechanisms and biomarkers of response.

Primary alveolar soft part sarcoma of the rectum resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a very rare soft tissue sarcoma. Primary ASPS of the gastrointestinal tract is especially rare. Due to the scarcity of cases, neither its clinicopathologic features nor its mutational background has been clarified. Here, we report a case of ASPS arising from the rectum, which was completely resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. The lesion was a 17 × 16 × 15 mm semi-pedunculated mass in the upper portion of the rectum in a 46-year-old female. In terms of histology, tumor cells exhibited confluent eosinophilic cytoplasm, forming a sheet-like architecture. Periodic acid Schiff-positive diastase-resistant intracytoplasmic crystals were observed in the tumor cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed TFE3 rearrangement, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed an ASPSCR1-TFE3 type 1 fusion. Negative PAX8 immunostaining and the absence of other massive lesions in postoperative imaging studies led to a diagnosis of primary ASPS of the rectum. The potential oncogenic role of the canonical ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion transcript in gastrointestinal ASPS was indicated. Primary gastrointestinal ASPS remains a diagnostic pitfall in routine surgical pathology.

When Molecular-Targeted Agents Meet Immunotherapy: The Opportunities for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) account for less than 1% of adult cancers with a median overall survival of 12 months in the metastatic setting. Although chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment for advanced disease, molecular targeted agents (MTAs) and immunotherapies are under intensive investigation in STS. The success of MTAs comes mainly from antiangiogenic agents in various STS subtypes, from colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor inhibitor in tenosynovial giant cell tumor and neurotrophic tropomyocin receptor kinase (NTRK) inhibitors while others, such as cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-4 inhibitors, remain under evaluation. In advanced STS the activity of single-agent immunotherapy was not paradigm-changing as in other tumor types. A better understanding of tumor microenvironment, the immunogenic properties of MTAs, and finding an optimal treatment combination to improve patients outcomes became a central topic of research and discussion. Furthermore, the development and incorporation of transcriptomic profiling-based classification will allow identification, refined patient selection, and guided-treatment assignment. This article reviewed recent advances in STS treatment in MTAs and immunotherapy, strategies to overcome resistance, and outcomes of combination treatments in different STS subtypes. Promising preliminary results from combination strategies have shed light on STS treatment. The increasing understanding of this heterogeneous group of tumors and its microenvironment biology may help develop and guide treatment strategies with MTA and immunotherapies, alone or in combination, in a tailored way based on predictive and validated biomarkers and tumor molecular profiling in this new coming era.

Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Specialist Center Experience

Purpose: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) account for 8% of all cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Metastatic STS contribute significantly to disease-related mortality in this age group; however, data are limited due to under-representation in clinical trials. Methods: AYAs aged 18-39 years, diagnosed with metastatic STS between 1990 and 2012, were identified from The Royal Marsden Hospital database. Outcomes of interest were clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors. Results: Overall, 455 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis of metastatic STS was 33 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-37 years). The most common histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (n = 68, 15%), synovial sarcoma (n = 68, 15%), Ewing sarcoma (n = 44, 10%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 35, 8%). Treatments included systemic therapy (n = 395, 87%; median 2 lines [IQR 1-3]; clinical trial n = 93, 22%), radiotherapy (n = 297, 66%), and metastasectomy (n = 191, 43%). Median duration between last chemotherapy regimen and death was 4.6 months (IQR 2-10). Median OS was 19.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8-22.2); 5-year OS was 16%. Of common subtypes, patients with rhabdomyosarcoma had the worst OS (8.8 months; 95% CI 7.9-11.4). Adverse prognostic factors included male gender, synchronous metastases, bone or liver metastases, first-line polychemotherapy, and no metastasectomy. Conclusions: Outcomes were variable; patients with supposed chemosensitive subtypes had particularly poor survival. The diverse behavior of STS in AYAs highlights the need for subtype-specific clinical trials.

Different approaches to advanced soft tissue sarcomas depending on treatment line, goal of therapy and histological subtype

Introduction: Although rapid evolution over the past few years in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management has not been without its challenges, it has brought clarity in several areas.Areas covered: This article summarizes the proceedings of the third edition of the Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Evidence and Experience symposium held March 2019 in Madrid, Spain. An update is provided of current approaches to advanced STS management. Case studies illustrate the role of trabectedin in advanced STS management.Expert opinion: First-line treatment of advanced STS requires distinct therapeutic strategies depending on goal: tumor shrinkage or tumor control. Since all sarcoma patients benefit from active treatment irrespective of age or line of therapy, oncologists have a duty to offer active systemic therapies unless the patient is unfit for treatment or chooses to end active treatment. Beyond the first line, histology becomes increasingly relevant for treatment selection. Agents with activity in specific sarcoma subtypes have been identified. Rare tumors represent a substantial medical need requiring strong international collaboration between research groups, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies, and patients to identify active drugs per subtype. Multidisciplinary care in an expert sarcoma center is the primary means of reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with sarcoma.

Precision Medicine in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare component of malignant diseases. STS includes various histological subtypes, and there are some important differences among the different histological subtypes regarding the mutation profile and sensitivity to antitumor agents. Many clinical trials of STS incorporating many different histological subtypes in various populations have been conducted; it is difficult to compare the findings and make conclusions about clinical efficacy. Targeted therapies focusing on specific histological subtypes and precision therapy focusing on the specific genetic mutation(s) of each STS patient are being investigated. Since STS patients are a small population, new clinical trial designs are required to evaluate and establish new targeted therapies for each histological subtype that has a limited number of patients, and preclinical investigations are needed to detect targetable mutations. Now that cancer genome profiling is used in clinical practice, it is urgently necessary to connect the genome profiling data obtained in clinical settings to the optimal clinical treatment strategies. Herein we review the development and challenges of precision therapy in the management of STS patients.

Optimization of the Therapeutic Approach to Patients with Sarcoma: Delphi Consensus

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a heterogeneous group of rare solid tumors associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The evaluation and treatment of STS require a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience in the management of these types of tumors. National and international clinical practice guidelines for STS do not always provide answers to a great many situations that specialists have to contend with in their everyday practice. This consensus provides a series of specific recommendations based on available scientific evidence and the experience of a group of experts to assist in decision-making by all the specialists involved in the management of STS.

Proteomic research in sarcomas - current status and future opportunities

Sarcomas are a rare group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 70 different histological subtypes. For the majority of these diseases, the molecular understanding of the basis of their initiation and progression remains unclear. As such, limited clinical progress in prognosis or therapeutic regimens have been made over the past few decades. Proteomics techniques are being increasingly utilised in the field of sarcoma research. Proteomic research efforts have thus far focused on histological subtype characterisation for the improvement of biological understanding, as well as for the identification of candidate diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers for use in clinic. However, the field itself is in its infancy, and none of these proteomic research findings have been translated into the clinic. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the proteomic strategies that have been employed in sarcoma research. We evaluate key proteomic studies concerning several rare and ultra-rare sarcoma subtypes including, gastrointestinal stromal tumours, osteosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant rhabdoid tumours, Ewing sarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, and alveolar soft part sarcoma. Consequently, we illustrate how routine implementation of proteomics within sarcoma research, integration of proteomics with other molecular profiling data, and incorporation of proteomics into clinical trial studies has the potential to propel the biological and clinical understanding of this group of complex rare cancers moving forward.

The landscape of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in sarcomas: looking beyond pazopanib

Introduction: Tyrosine kinases are key mediators of intracellular signaling cascades and aberrations in these proteins have been implicated in driving oncogenesis through the dysregulation of fundamental cellular processes including proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. As such, targeting these proteins with small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has led to significant advances in the treatment of a number of cancer types.Areas covered: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous and challenging group of rare cancers to treat, but the approval of the TKI pazopanib for the treatment of advanced STS demonstrates that this class of drugs may have broad utility against a range of different sarcoma histological subtypes. Since the approval of pazopanib, a number of other TKIs have entered clinical trials to evaluate whether their activity in STS matches the promising results seen in other solid tumors. In this article, we review the emerging role of TKIs in the evolving landscape of sarcoma treatment.Expert opinion: As our biological understanding of response and resistance of STS to TKIs advances, we anticipate that patient management will move away from a 'one size fits all' paradigm toward personalized, multi-line, and patient-specific treatment regimens where patients are treated according to the underlying biology and genetics of their specific disease.