Characterisation of new in vitro models and identification of potentially active drugs in angiosarcoma

Angiosarcoma is a rare soft tissue sarcoma originating from endothelial cells. Given that current treatments for advanced disease have shown limited efficacy, alternative therapies need to be identified. In rare diseases, patient-derived cell models are crucial for screening anti-tumour activity. In this study, cell line models were characterised in 2D and 3D cultures. The cell lines' growth, migration and invasion capabilities were explored, confirming them as useful tools for preclinical angiosarcoma studies. By screening a drug library, we identified potentially effective compounds: 8-amino adenosine impacted cell growth and inhibited migration and invasion at considerably low concentrations as a single agent. No synergistic effect was detected when combining with paclitaxel, gemcitabine or doxorubicin. These results suggest that this compound could be a potentially useful drug in the treatment of AGS.

Statement of the AGO Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria, Swiss AGO, BGOG, CEEGOG, GEICO, and SFOG regarding the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in epithelial ovarian cancer

An international joint statement about the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer was published in 2016, warning about the uncritical use of HIPEC outside controlled studies. This statement has now been updated after the most recent literature was reviewed by the participating study groups and societies. HIPEC became a treatment option in patients with advanced colon cancer after positive results of a randomized trial comparing surgery and HIPEC versus palliative treatment alone. Although this trial did not compare the added value of HIPEC to surgery alone, HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases was in the subsequent years generalized to many other cancer types associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis including epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In the meantime, new evidence from prospective randomized trials specifically for EOC-patients emerged, with however contradicting results and several quality aspects that made the interpretation of their findings critical. Moreover, three additional trials in colorectal cancer failed to confirm the previously presumed survival benefit through the implementation of HIPEC in peritoneally disseminated colorectal cancers. Based on a still unclear and inconsistent landscape, the authors conclude that HIPEC should remain within the remit of clinical trials for EOC-patients. Available evidence is not yet sufficient to justify its broad endorsement into the routine clinical practice.

Efficacy of second and third lines of treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumours. Several drugs and combinations have been used in clinical practice as second-line (2L) and third-line (3L) treatment. The growth modulation index (GMI) has previously been used as an exploratory efficacy endpoint of drug activity and represents an intra-patient comparison.

METHODS

We performed a real-world retrospective study including all patients with advanced STS who had received at least 2 different lines of treatment for advanced disease between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution. The objective was to study the efficacy of both 2L and 3L treatments, analysing the time to progression (TTP) and the GMI (defined as the ratio of TTP between 2 consecutive lines of therapy).

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included. The median TTP after 2L and 3L treatment was 3.16 and 3.06 months, and the median GMI was 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. The regimens most frequently used in both treatments were trabectedin, gemcitabine-dacarbazine, gemcitabine-docetaxel, pazopanib and ifosfamide. The median TTP by each of these regimens was 2.80, 2.23, 2.83, 4.10, and 5.00 months, and the median GMI was 0.78, 0.73, 0.67, 1.08, and 0.94, respectively. In terms of histotype, we highlight the activity (GMI > 1.33) of gemcitabine-dacarbazine in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and in leiomyosarcoma, pazopanib in UPS, and ifosfamide in synovial sarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, regimens commonly used after first-line STS treatment showed only slight differences in efficacy, although we found significant activity of specific regimens by histotype.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in alveolar soft-part sarcoma: results from a retrospective worldwide registry

BACKGROUND

Conventional cytotoxic drugs are not effective in alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS). Immune checkpoint (programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1) inhibitors (ICIs) are promising drugs in ASPS. A worldwide registry explored the efficacy of ICI in ASPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from adult patients diagnosed with ASPS and treated with ICI for advanced disease in expert sarcoma centers from Europe, Australia and North America were retrospectively collected, including demographics and data related to treatments and outcome.

RESULTS

Seventy-six ASPS patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 25 years (range 3-61 years), were registered. All patients received ICI for metastatic disease. Immunotherapy regimens consisted of monotherapy in 38 patients (50%) and combination in 38 (50%) (23 with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor). Among the 68 assessable patients, there were 3 complete responses and 34 partial responses, translating into an overall response rate of 54.4%. After a median follow-up of 36 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 32-40 months] since the start of immunotherapy, 45 (59%) patients have progressed on ICI, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 16.3 months (95% CI 8-25 months). Receiving ICI in first line (P = 0.042) and achieving an objective response (P = 0.043) correlated with a better PFS. Median estimated overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation has not been reached. The 12-month and 24-month OS rates were 94% and 81%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This registry constitutes the largest available series of ASPS treated with ICI. Our results suggest that the ICI treatment provides long-lasting disease control and prolonged OS in patients with advanced ASPS, an ultra-rare entity with limited active therapeutic options.

Maintenance olaparib rechallenge in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with a PARP inhibitor (OReO/ENGOT-ov38): a phase IIIb trial

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy is the standard of care for some patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor rechallenge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (NCT03106987) enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received one prior PARP inhibitor therapy for ≥18 and ≥12 months in the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, respectively, following first-line chemotherapy or for ≥12 and ≥6 months, respectively, following a second or subsequent line of chemotherapy. Patients were in response following their last platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and were randomized 2 : 1 to maintenance olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily or placebo. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Seventy four patients in the BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 38 to placebo, and 72 patients in the non-BRCA-mutated cohort were randomized to olaparib and 36 to placebo; >85% of patients in both cohorts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy. In the BRCA-mutated cohort, the median PFS was 4.3 months with olaparib versus 2.8 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.87; P = 0.022]; 1-year PFS rates were 19% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). In the non-BRCA-mutated cohort, median PFS was 5.3 months for olaparib versus 2.8 months for placebo (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.71; P = 0.0023); 1-year PFS rates were 14% versus 0% (Kaplan-Meier estimates). No new safety signals were identified with olaparib rechallenge.

CONCLUSIONS

In ovarian cancer patients previously treated with one prior PARP inhibitor and at least two lines of platinum-based chemotherapy, maintenance olaparib rechallenge provided a statistically significant, albeit modest, PFS improvement over placebo in both the BRCA-mutated and non-BRCA-mutated cohorts, with a proportion of patients in the maintenance olaparib rechallenge arm of both cohorts remaining progression free at 1 year.

Phase II trial of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in advanced sarcoma based on mRNA expression of CDK4/ CDKN2A

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors demonstrated activity in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD-LPS), a sarcoma with CDK4 amplification. CDK4 overexpression is by far more common than amplification in sarcomas and it might be a rational target for CDK inhibitors. Preclinical investigators of this study found that CDK4 overexpression, while not of CDKN2A, was the most consistent predictive factor for palbociclib efficacy in sarcomas. Advanced adult-type soft-tissue sarcoma, excluding DD-LPS, or bone sarcoma patients, progressing after at least one systemic line, whose tumors overexpressed CDK4, but not CDKN2A at baseline biopsy, were accrued in this single-arm phase II trial (EudraCT number: 2016-004039-19). With the main endpoint of a 6-month PFS rate, 40% was considered promising in this population. Palbociclib was administered orally at 125 mg/day for 21 days in 28-day cycles. A total of 214 patients with 236 CDK4/CDKN2A determinations were assessed for prescreening, archival material (141), and screening, baseline biopsy (95). There were 28 (29%) with favorable mRNA profiles from 95 screened patients at baseline. From 23 enrolled patients, 21 evaluable, the 6-month PFS rate was 29% (95% CI 9-48), and there were 6 patients out of 21 with a PFS longer than 6 months. The median PFS and overall survival were 4.2 (95% CI 3.6-4.8) and 12 (95% CI 8.7-15.4) months, respectively. Translational research showed a significant correlation between CDK4 mRNA and protein expression. Palbociclib was active in a variety of sarcoma subtypes, selected by CDK4/CDKN2A, and deserves further investigation in the sarcoma context.

Lenalidomide in combination with R-ESHAP in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase 2 study from GELTAMO

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) disease have poor outcomes with current salvage regimens. We conducted a phase 2 trial to analyse the safety and efficacy of adding lenalidomide to R-ESHAP (LR-ESHAP) in patients with RR DLBCL. Subjects received 3 cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle, in combination with R-ESHAP at standard doses. Responding patients underwent autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) after 3 cycles. Centralized cell-of-origin (COO) classification was performed. Forty-six patients were included. The ORR after LR-ESHAP was 67% (35% of patients achieved complete remission). Patients with primary refractory disease (n = 26) had significantly worse ORR than patients with non-refractory disease (54% vs. 85%, p = 0.031). No differences in response rates according to the COO were observed. Twenty-eight patients (61%) underwent ASCT. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the estimated 3-year PFS and OS were 42% and 48%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (70% of patients), neutropenia (67%) and anaemia (35%). There were no treatment-related deaths during LR-ESHAP cycles. In conclusion, LR-ESHAP is a feasible salvage regimen with promising efficacy results for patients with RR DLBCL.

Comparison of Methods for Testing Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrial Cancer

Approximately 20-30% of endometrial carcinomas (EC) are characterized by mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI), and their testing has become part of the routine diagnosis. The aim of this study was to establish and compare the MMR status using various approaches. Immunohistochemistry (IHC), PCR-based MSI, and the detection of defects in the four key MMR genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6) via methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed. MSH3 expression was also evaluated. A set of 126 early-stage EC samples were analyzed, 53.2% of which were dMMR and 46.8% of which were proficient MMR (pMMR) as determined using IHC, whereas 69.3% were classified as microsatellite stable, while 8.8% and 21.9% were classified MSI-low (MSI-L) and MSI-high (MSI-H), respectively. In total, 44.3% of the samples showed genetic or epigenetic alterations in one or more genes; MLH1 promoter methylation was the most common event. Although acceptable concordance was observed, there were overall discrepancies between the three testing approaches, mainly associated with the dMMR group. IHC had a better correlation with MMR genomic status than the MSI status determined using PCR. Further studies are needed to establish solid conclusions regarding the best MMR assessment technique for EC.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023

BACKGROUND

As part of its mission to improve the quality of care for women with gynecological cancers across Europe, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) first published in 2017 evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To update the ESGO guidelines based on the new evidence addressing the management of vulvar cancer and to cover new topics in order to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment of vulvar cancer.

METHODS

The ESGO Council nominated an international development group comprised of practicing clinicians who provide care to vulvar cancer patients and have demonstrated leadership through their expertize in clinical care and research, national and international engagement and profile as well as dedication to the topics addressed to serve on the expert panel (18 experts across Europe). To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, new data identified from a systematic search were reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 206 international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

RESULTS

The updated guidelines cover comprehensively diagnosis and referral, staging, pathology, pre-operative investigations, surgical management (local treatment, groin treatment, sentinel lymph node procedure, reconstructive surgery), (chemo)radiotherapy, systemic treatment, treatment of recurrent disease (vulvar, inguinal, pelvic, and distant recurrences), and follow-up. Management algorithms are also defined.

Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma by the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and biologically heterogeneous group of tumors arising from mesenchymal cells. The incidence is estimated at five cases per 100,000 people per year. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for 10-15% of all STS, and their management depends on their anatomical characteristics and histotype. Due to their very low incidence, it is recommended that RPS be treated in reference centers and evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT). In Spain, the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) brings together experts from various specialties to promote research on sarcomas and improve treatment results. This paper summarizes the GEIS recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with RPS.

Uterine sarcomas: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, by Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS)

Uterine sarcomas are very infrequent and heterogeneous entities. Due to its rarity, pathological diagnosis, surgical management, and systemic treatment are challenging. Treatment decision process in these tumors should be taken in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Available evidence is low and, in many cases, based on case series or clinical trials in which these tumors have been included with other soft tissue sarcoma. In these guidelines, we have tried to summarize the most relevant evidence in the diagnosis, staging, pathological disparities, surgical management, systemic treatment, and follow-up of uterine sarcomas.

Clinical and molecular signature of survival and resistance to olaparib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a stratified analysis from the phase II clinical trial ROLANDO, GEICO-1601

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential prognostic value of clinical and molecular biomarkers in the survival of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated with olaparib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.

METHODS

ROLANDO was a single-arm phase II trial that included patients with high-grade serous or endometrioid tumors and at least one previous platinum-resistant recurrence regardless of BRCA status. Patients received 6 cycles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days plus olaparib 300 mg twice daily. followed by olaparib 300 mg twice daily; monotherapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prognostic factors including previous lines (and platinum-containing ones), BRCA mutation status, previous bevacizumab, CA-125 levels, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte/monocyte ratio, and platelet/lymphocyte ratio calculated at inclusion were analyzed through a multivariate logistic regression and factor analysis of mixed data.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included. Median age was 57 years (range 43-75), Eastern Cooperative Oncolgy Group performance status 0/1: 32.3%/67.7% and BRCA mutated: 16.1%. Prior treatment lines were >2 lines: 14 (45.2%) patients, ≥2 platinum lines: 21 patients (67.7%) and previous bevacizumab 19 (61.3%) patients. CA-125 was >2 upper limit normal in 24 (77.4%) patients. A high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio was associated with worse overall survival by univariate/multivariate regression model (HR=11.18; 95% CI 1.1 to 114.5; p=0.042). No other factors were associated with overall survival in the multivariate model. A multifactorial signature based on clinical and molecular baseline characteristics was capable of defining six patient clusters. Three of these clusters had significantly better prognosis, with a median overall survival of 21.3 months (95% CI 12.2 to not reached).

CONCLUSIONS

High neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio at platinum-resistant relapse indicated poor prognosis in patients treated with olaparib plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. A multifactorial clinical signature was more precise than single variables for implying the prognosis and may help in therapeutic assignment after further validation in large prospective cohorts.

Primary intraosseous alveolar soft part sarcoma: Report of two cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) accounts for less than 1 % of all soft tissue sarcomas. ASPS presents a poor prognosis and develops frequent metastases, especially in the lungs, brain and bones. Current therapies, such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are not fully effective and other alternative treatments are currently being studied. ASPS is predominantly found in the deep soft tissues of the lower extremities. To our knowledge, only thirteen primary intraosseous ASPS have been reported in the literature. In this study, we report two new cases of this exceedingly rare entity. Both cases already had multiple metastases since diagnosis; one of them represents the first case of a primary bone ASPS in the ulna and is also the primary intraosseous ASPS with the longest reported case of survival, after having maintained long periods of stabilization despite not having received any systemic treatment.

Spatial distribution of CD3- and CD8-positive lymphocytes as pretest for POLE wild-type in molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma

Introduction

Over the years, the molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma has evolved significantly. Both POLEmut and MMRdef cases share tumor biological similarities like high tumor mutational burden and induce strong lymphatic reactions. While therefore use case scenarios for pretesting with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to replace molecular analysis did not show promising results, such testing may be warranted in cases where an inverse prediction, such as that of POLEwt, is being considered. For that reason we used a spatial digital pathology method to quantitatively examine CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ immune infiltrates in comparison to conventional histopathological parameters, prognostics and as potential pretest before molecular analysis.

Methods

We applied a four-color multiplex immunofluorescence assay for pan-cytokeratin, CD3, CD8, and DAPI on 252 endometrial carcinomas as testing and compared it to further 213 cases as validation cohort from a similar multiplexing assay. We quantitatively assessed immune infiltrates in microscopic distances within the carcinoma, in a close distance of 50 microns, and in more distant areas.

Results

Regarding prognostics, high CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ densities in intra-tumoral and close subregions pointed toward a favorable outcome. However, TCGA subtyping outperforms prognostication of CD3 and CD8 based parameters. Different CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ densities were significantly associated with the TCGA subgroups, but not consistently for histopathological parameter. In the testing cohort, intra-tumoral densities of less than 50 intra-tumoral CD8⁺ cells/mm² were the most suitable parameter to assume a POLEwt, irrespective of an MMRdef, NSMP or p53abn background. An application to the validation cohort corroborates these findings with an overall sensitivity of 95.5%.

Discussion

Molecular confirmation of POLEmut cases remains the gold standard. Even if CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ cell densities appeared less prognostic than TCGA, low intra-tumoral CD8⁺ values predict a POLE wild-type at substantial percentage rates, but not vice versa. This inverse correlation might be useful to increase pretest probabilities in consecutive POLE testing. Molecular subtyping is currently not conducted in one-third of cases deemed low-risk based on conventional clinical and histopathological parameters. However, this percentage could potentially be increased to two-thirds by excluding sequencing of predicted POLE wild-type cases, which could be determined through precise quantification of intra-tumoral CD8⁺ cells.

COMORBIDITIES ASSOCIATED WITH RISK OF MYOCARDITIS IN HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 OLDER ADULTS

Background

Older adults are afflicted more severely by COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 can be complicated by myocarditis (MC), and the incidence of MC has been shown to correlate linearly with severity. However, data on comorbidities associated with MC in this population is scarce.

Methods

Data were obtained from the PearlDiver database (PearlDiver Technologies, Fort Wayne, IN). The study used ICD codes to include patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19, aged 65–75, and Elixhauser Comorbidity index(ECI)>4. Within this cohort, we identified patients diagnosed with MC 60 days after admission and compared their baseline comorbidities upon admission to those without MC. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare groups. The strength of association was reported by Risk Ratios (RR). A p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant.

Results

412,582 patients admitted with COVID-19 as the primary diagnosis were identified. 0.12% of this cohort developed MC over the following 60 days. The MC group was more likely to be male(57%, p=0.0001), with similar mean age(70.4, p=0.86) and mean ECI(9.4, p=0.07) to the no-MC group. Patients who developed MC have significantly higher rates of prior heart failure(RR= 1.30, CI95%=1.07–1.57, p=0.008). There was no difference between groups in terms of history of arrhythmias(p=0.36), cerebrovascular disease(p=0.09), chronic kidney disease(p=0.13), CAD(P=0.19), diabetes(p=0.48), ischemic heart disease(p=0.06), tobacco use(p=0.39), alcohol use(p=0.17), HIV(p=0.79), and severe liver disease(p=0.14).

Conclusion

A history of heart failure increased the likelihood of developing MC in older adults.

THE RISK OF COVID-19-RELATED MYOCARDITIS IN OLDER ADULTS WITH A HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Background

Data suggest an increased incidence of myocarditis (MC) associated with the COVID-19 virus. However, the risk factors for COVID-19-related MC remains poorly understood and debated. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the correlation of a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) with MC in older adults admitted for COVID-19.

Methods

Data were obtained from the PearlDiver database (PearlDiver Technologies, Fort Wayne, IN). The study included patients aged 65–75, hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19, and Elixhauser Comorbidity index(ECI) >4. History of CAD upon admission was used to split the cohort into two propensity score-matched groups considering age, gender, other cardiovascular diseases, and ECI. Records from both groups were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with MC during and up to one month after admission. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare groups. The strength of association was reported using Risk Ratios (RR). A p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant.

Results

182,556 patients with and 218,729 without a history of CAD admitted for COVID-19 were identified. Patients with a history of CAD were more likely to be male(54.7% vs. 42% p < 0.0001), older(mean age 70.62 vs. 70.30, p < 0.001), and had more comorbidities(ECI=11 vs. 8, p < 0.0001). After propensity score matching, 0.13% of patients with CAD and 0.12% without CAD developed MC within one month of admission(RR= 1.05, CI95%=0.87–1.26, p=0.61).

Conclusion

One month following admission for COVID-19, the risk of MC was not significantly higher in older persons with a history of CAD.

A phase II trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel for progressive and symptomatic desmoid tumors

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) are mesenchymal neoplasms, with potential aggressive course and relevant clinical impact. New systemic therapy modalities are needed in this symptomatic/progressive population. In this multicenter, phase II trial (NCT03275818), patients with symptomatic/progressing DF received three cycles of weekly nab-paclitaxel. Brief pain inventory short form (BPI-SF) was collected at baseline and in every visit. MRI was performed every 3 months. Primary composite endpoint was RECIST 1.1 overall response rate (ORR) and/or clinical response (improvement ≥ 2 points in BPI-SF). If 40% of patients achieved clinical/radiological response, further investigation would be warranted. Toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), pattern of response and its correlation with clinical best response and BPI, variation of physical function, and analgesic consumption were secondary endpoints. The translational research reported was not a pre-specified secondary outcome. Forty eligible patients started therapy, being 35 radiologically and clinically evaluable. The study achieved its primary endpoint, as 7(20%) patients obtained RECIST partial response, whereas 31(89%) experienced pain reduction of ≥2 points in BPI-SF worst pain. Therapy was well tolerated. With a median follow-up of 30(14-44) months, median 12 and 24-months PFS rates were 91%(CI 95%, 82-100) and 84%(CI 95%, 71-97). For clinical progression, 12 and 24-months PFS rates were 85% (CI 95%, 73-97) and 74% (CI 95%, 58-90) respectively. Short course of nab-paclitaxel is active, safe and achieves quick and durable responses in progressing/symptomatic DF patients.

Patient-reported outcomes in the GARNET trial in patients with advanced or recurrent mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab

OBJECTIVE

There is an increase in patient-reported outcome assessments to gain information on new drug candidates from the patient's perspective. A data gap remains in patient-reported outcome measurements for anti-programmed death 1 (anti-PD-1) therapies in endometrial cancer. We present patient-reported outcome measures collected from patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in an expansion cohort of the GARNET trial.

METHODS

GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase I single-arm study of dostarlimab monotherapy in multiple tumor types. Patients with advanced or recurrent mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer were treated with 500 mg of intravenous dostarlimab once every 3 weeks for four cycles, then 1000 mg of intravenous dostarlimab every 6 weeks. Patient-reported outcome assessments were an exploratory endpoint, measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

RESULTS

At data cut-off, 88 patients with mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer were included in the analysis. Patient-reported outcome assessment completion was >95.5% throughout cycle 7 of the trial, with no individual domain completion <90.9%. Quality of life, emotional functioning, and social functioning showed improvement compared with baseline. All symptom scores showed either improvement or stability from baseline through cycle 7. Categorical change in response across all symptom scales and single-item response scores showed stability or improvement for most patients. For patients who saw a worsening of their categorical change in response, ≤7.4% experienced a 2-category worsening and ≤2.5% experienced a 3-category worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients remained stable or had improved quality of life while receiving dostarlimab for the treatment of recurrent or advanced mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02715284.

Phase II trial of palbociclib in advanced sarcoma overexpressing CDK4 gene excluding dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DD LPS): A study from the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcoma (GEIS)

11511

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors showed a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in DD LPS, a sarcoma bearing 12q 13-15 amplicon that implies CDK4 amplification. The median PFS was 4 and 7 months (m) for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. Preclinical experiments in 10 sarcoma cell lines and 6 PDX models, including only one DD LPS, showed higher efficacy of anti-CDK4 in cases with high expression of CDK4 and low expression of p16. This rationale supported the design of a phase II trial exploring palbociclib in a wide range of sarcomas, excluding DD LPS. Methods: Progressing pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma, excluding DD LPS, or osteosarcoma adult patients (pts), whose tumors overexpressed CDK4 and underexpressed CDKN2A mRNA in a baseline mandatory biopsy, were enrolled. CDK4 and CDKN2A expression were assessed by qRT-PCR, using an external control as reference (Universal human reference RNA; Agilent Technologies). The primary endpoint was 6-m PFS rate. Minimax Simon’s two-stage with type 1 and 2 errors of 10%, and null and alternative hypothesis of H0 15%, H1 40%, 6-month PFS rates were specified. The study will warrant further investigation if 6 or more pts had a PFS > 6 m from 21 evaluable pts. Palbociclib was administered orally at 125 mg/ day 21 out of 28 days. Pre-screening intended to increase the probability of positive profile in the baseline biopsy. Results: A total of 214 pts with 236 CDK4/ CDKN2A determinations were assessed for enrolment; 141 for prescreening, in archive tumor sample, and 95 for screening, in a baseline biopsy. There were 38/141 (27%) and 28/95 (29%) pts with favorable mRNA profile from pre and screening, respectively. Twenty-two pts were enrolled with a median of previous systemic lines of 3 (1-5). There were 9 different sarcoma subtypes, including 2 osteosarcomas. With a median FU of 10 m (0.4-23.3), the median PFS was 4.2 m (95% CI 0.9-7.4), while the 6- and 12-m PFS rates were 30% (95% CI 9-51) and 18% (95% CI 12-48) respectively. From 19 evaluable pts (1 early death by COVID, 1 withdrew consent and for 1 it was too early to be assessed) 11 had stable disease (58%) and 8 progressed (42%) as the best response. Patients with CDK4 expression above the median value had significantly longer mPFS in the univariate analysis: 5.9 m (95% CI 1.4-10.4) vs 1.9 m (95% CI 0.6-3.2), p = 0.046; and longer OS: 15.5 m (95% CI 6.8-24.3) vs 10.6 m (95% CI 0-23.2), p = 0.047, respectively. The probability to find a positive profile in the screening was 29%, but this proportion increased up to 41% if in pre-screening had been positive. Conclusions: Palbociclib showed to be effective in a wide variety of sarcoma subtypes, other than DD LPS, selected by CDK4/CDKN2A biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT03242382.

Prognostic value of EZH2 expression for immunotherapy-based schemes in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma: A translational research from Spanish Group of Research on Sarcoma (GEIS)

11549

Background: Immunotherapy-based treatments had shown to be active in several solid tumors, including in selected subtypes of sarcomas. IMMUNOSARC (NCT03277924) is a phase Ib/II trial [from Spanish (GEIS) and Italian (ISG) sarcoma groups], that tested the combination of nivolumab (anti-PD-1 inhibitor) plus sunitinib (anti-angiogenic agent) in advanced sarcomas. Among the 65 soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients (pts) enrolled, 48% were free of progression at 6 months, meeting the trial’s primary endpoint. EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 and it has been described to play an important role in the transcriptional repression of genes involved in T-cell migration and T-cell-mediated anti-tumor activity. The aim of this study was to explore the value of EZH2 gene expression as potential prognostic biomarker of the activity of immunotherapy-based schemes. Methods: The expression of EZH2 was evaluated in 64 paraffin tumor blocks, by direct transcriptomics, using HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarkers Panel (HTG Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.; Tucson, AZ, USA). Data was normalized with DESeq2 and the cut-off of EZH2 expression was calculated with MAXSTAT R package. Gene expression was correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST, overall survival (OS) and clinical benefit (patients with response or stable disease vs patients with progressive disease as best response). Results: Among the 64 pts analyzed, 52 (81%) showed overexpression of EZH2, considering a cut-off of 570.15 read counts. Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and epithelioid sarcoma were the subtypes with higher expression of EZH2 with a median of read counts of 1888.04 (n = 10) and 1261.79 (n = 7), respectively. The lowest expressions were observed in extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (ECM) and alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) with a median of read counts of 461.42 (n = 4) and 680.84 (n = 7), respectively. Low expression of EZH2 was associated with better PFS (16.8 months vs. 3.9 months; p = 0.001) and better OS (NR vs. 20.0 months; p = 0.006). Moreover, low expression of EZH2 was also significantly associated with a clinical benefit of the patients treated with nivolumab plus sunitinib [relative risk (RR): 13; 95% CI: 3.0-56.9; p = < 0.001). Conclusions: Low expression of EZH2 was associated with better outcome in advanced STS patients treated with immunotherapy-based schemes. These results might support the rationale for the combination of EZH2 inhibitors with immune-modulating agents for future studies.

AGO-OVAR 2.29 (ENGOT-ov34): Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC)

TPS5611

Background: Paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with bevacizumab constitutes a standard treatment option in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who are not considered candidate for platinum, but responses are short-lived. Immune checkpoint inhibitors like atezolizumab as single agents have limited activity in ovarian cancer. There is a biologic rationale to combine checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy and bevacizumab, however, the role of such combination for the management of ovarian cancer is so far undefined. Because of the intimate relationship between angiogenesis and immunosuppression, it is expected that the inhibition of both pathways could lead to synergism and more durable clinical benefit. The addition of a chemotherapeutic agent is expected to lead to the release of tumor antigens and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in turn. Therefore, we aim to test the efficacy of atezolizumab in combination with non-platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab vs the combination of a non-platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone. Methods: AGO-OVAR 2.29 is a randomized (1:1), double blinded, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) compared with placebo plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with 1st or 2nd relapse within 6 months after completing platinum-based chemotherapy or 3rd relapse. A de novo tumor biopsy to determine the PD-L1 expression status prior to randomization for stratification is mandatory. Patients are treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab + atezolizumab/placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free survival. It is planned to randomize approximately 664 patients. Safety interim analyses were performed after inclusion of 24 and an additional 60 and 120 patients who had completed at least one treatment cycle. As of 09th February 2022, 461 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03353831.

Prognostic markers of inflammation in endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer

Objectives

Cancer-related systemic inflammation has been associated with prognosis in multiple cancer types. Conversely, local inflammation, which is characterized by dense intratumoral immune infiltrates, is a favorable predictor of survival outcome. However, these survival associations are not well established in ovarian cancer, particularly in the less frequent endometrioid and clear cell endometriosis associated histotypes.

Methods

This retrospective study included 119 patients (63 endometrioid and 56 clear cell ovarian carcinomas). We performed a comprehensive survival association analysis of both systemic (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or presence of endometriosis) and local inflammation markers (CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes) using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models that account for confounding factors.

Results

Medium to high levels of intraepithelial CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with longer survival in endometrioid ovarian cancer (p=0.04). In addition, we found that intraepithelial CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in clear cell ovarian cancer (p=0.02), and that intraepithelial CD3+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are also associated with improved outcome (p=0.02). Furthermore, intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes showed improved prognosis in the endometrioid subtype (p<0.1). No prognostic value was observed for systemic immune markers.

Conclusions

In this study, patients with endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer with moderate to high CD8+ and CD3+ intraepithelial tumor infiltrating lymphocytes had longer overall survival. Higher expression of intratumoral CD3+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes also showed an improved outcome in endometrioid ovarian cancer. In contrast, systemic inflammation, evaluated by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio or presence of endometriosis, did not have a prognostic impact in these histologic subtypes.

Phase 2 Trial (POLA Study) of Lurbinectedin plus Olaparib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results of Efficacy, Tolerability, and the Translational Study

Simple Summary

Genomic instability (GI) is a transversal phenomenon in oncology, constituting a hallmark of cancer. In gynecological malignancies, the predictive value of GI has been described and is mainly caused by alterations in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, such as BRCA1/2. The POLA clinical trial constitutes an ideal substrate used to study the correlation between GI and response to combined therapy of lurbinectedin plus olaparib in solid tumors. In this context, we developed an approach based on next-generation sequencing, capable of shedding information about Copy Number Variations (CNV) as a surrogate of GI and genotyping of homologous recombination repair genes. Additionally, some algorithms used to extract GI parameters were tested and benchmarked, selecting the most informative mutational and GI features as potential predictive biomarkers for the drug combination explored in the POLA trial.

Abstract

We hypothesized that the combination of olaparib and lurbinectedin maximizes DNA damage, thus increasing its efficacy. The POLA phase 1 trial established the recommended phase 2 dose of lurbinectedin as being 1.5 mg (day 1) and that of olaparib as being 250 mg/12 h (days 1–5) for a 21-day cycle. In phase 2, we explore the efficacy of the combination in terms of clinical response and its correlation with mutations in the HRR genes and the genomic instability (GI) parameters. Results: A total of 73 patients with high-grade ovarian (n = 46), endometrial (n = 26), and triple-negative breast cancer (n = 1) were treated with lurbinectedin and olaparib. Most patients (62%) received ≥3 lines of prior therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 9.6% and 72.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.54 months (95% CI 3.0–5.2). Twelve (16.4%) patients were considered long-term responders (LTR), with a median PFS of 13.3 months. No clinical benefit was observed for cases with HRR gene mutation. In ovarian LTRs, although a direct association with GI and a total loss of heterozygosity (LOH) events was observed, the association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055). Globally, the total number of LOHs might be associated with the ORR (p =0.074). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia and thrombocytopenia, in 6 (8.2%) and 3 (4.1%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The POLA study provides evidence that the administration of lurbinectedin and olaparib is feasible and tolerable, with a DCR of 72.6%. Different GI parameters showed associations with better responses.

Prognostic implications of tumor-infiltrating T cells in early-stage endometrial cancer

Patients with endometrial cancer differ in terms of the extent of T-cell infiltration; however, the association between T-cell subpopulations and patient outcomes remains unexplored. We characterized 285 early-stage endometrial carcinoma samples for T-cell infiltrates in a tissue microarray format using multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry. The proportion of T cells and their subpopulations were associated with clinicopathological features and relapse-free survival outcomes. CD3+ CD4+ infiltrates were more abundant in the patients with higher grade or non-endometrioid histology. Cytotoxic T cells (CD25+, PD-1+, and PD-L1+) were strongly associated with longer relapse-free survival. Moreover, CD3+ PD-1+ stromal cells were independent of other immune T-cell populations and clinicopathological factors in predicting relapses. Patients with high stromal T-cell fraction of CD3+ PD-1+ cells were associated with a 5-year relapse-free survival rate of 93.7% compared to 79.0% in patients with low CD3+ PD-1+ fraction. Moreover, in patients classically linked to a favorable outcome (such as endometrioid subtype and low-grade tumors), the stromal CD3+ PD-1+ T-cell fraction remained prognostically significant. This study supports that T-cell infiltrates play a significant prognostic role in early-stage endometrial carcinoma. Specifically, CD3+ PD-1+ stromal cells emerge as a promising novel prognostic biomarker.

Eribulin activity in soft tissue sarcoma monolayer and three-dimensional cell line models: could the combination with other drugs improve its antitumoral effect?

BACKGROUND

Eribulin has shown antitumour activity in some soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), but it has only been approved for advanced liposarcoma (LPS).

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated the effect of eribulin on proliferation, migration and invasion capabilities in LPS, leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and fibrosarcoma (FS) models, using both monolayer (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cell cultures. Additionally, we explored combinations of eribulin with other drugs commonly used in the treatment of STS with the aim of increasing its antitumour activity.

RESULTS

Eribulin showed activity inhibiting proliferation, 2D and 3D migration and invasion in most of the cell line models. Furthermore, we provide data that suggest, for the first time, a synergistic effect with ifosfamide in all models, and with pazopanib in LMS as well as in myxoid and pleomorphic LPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the effect of eribulin on LPS, LMS and FS cell line models. The combination of eribulin with ifosfamide or pazopanib has shown in vitro synergy, which warrants further clinical research.

Olaparib in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer regardless of BRCA status: a GEICO phase II trial (ROLANDO study)

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence for the benefit of olaparib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) patients with BRCA wild-type tumors. This study investigated whether this combination of a DNA-damaging chemotherapy plus olaparib is effective in PROC regardless BRCA status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian carcinoma and one previous PROC recurrence were enrolled regardless of BRCA status. Patients with ≤4 previous lines (up to 5 in BRCA-mut) with at least one previous platinum-sensitive relapse were included; primary PROC was allowed only in case of BRCA-mut. Patients initially received six cycles of olaparib 300 mg b.i.d. (biduum) + intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) 40 mg/m2 (PLD40) every 28 days, followed by maintenance with olaparib 300 mg b.i.d. until progression or toxicity. The PLD dose was reduced to 30 mg/m2 (PLD30) due to toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (6m-PFS) by RECIST version 1.1. A proportion of 40% 6m-PFS or more was considered of clinical interest.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2020, 31 PROC patients were included. BRCA mutations were present in 16%. The median of previous lines was 2 (range 1-5). The overall disease control rate was 77% (partial response rate of 29% and stable disease rate of 48%). After a median follow-up of 10 months, the 6m-PFS and median PFS were 47% and 5.8 months, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 74% of patients, with neutropenia/anemia being the most frequent. With PLD30 serious AEs were less frequent than with PLD40 (21% versus 47%, respectively); moreover, PLD30 was associated with less PLD delays (32% versus 38%) and reductions (16% versus 22%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PLD-olaparib combination has shown significant activity in PROC regardless of BRCA status. PLD at 30 mg/m2 is better tolerated in the combination.

Management of advanced ovarian cancer in Spain: an expert Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

To determine the state of current practice and to reach a consensus on recommendations for the management of advanced ovarian cancer using a Delphi survey with a group of Spanish gynecologists and medical oncologists specially dedicated to gynecological tumors.

METHODS

The questionnaire was developed by the byline authors. All questions but one were answered using a 9-item Likert-like scale with three types of answers: frequency, relevance and agreement. We performed two rounds between December 2018 and July 2019. A consensus was considered reached when at least 75% of the answers were located within three consecutive points of the Likert scale.

RESULTS

In the first round, 32 oncologists and gynecologists were invited to participate, and 31 (96.9%) completed the online questionnaire. In the second round, 27 (87.1%) completed the online questionnaire. The results for the questions on first-line management of advanced disease, treatment of patients with recurrent disease for whom platinum might be the best option, and treatment of patients with recurrent disease for whom platinum might not be the best option are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey shows a snapshot of current recommendations by this selected group of physicians. Although the majority of the agreements and recommendations are aligned with the recently published ESMO-ESGO consensus, there are some discrepancies that can be explained by differences in the interpretation of certain clinical trials, reimbursement or accessibility issues.

Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combined Trabectedin and Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Nonrandomized Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial

Importance

Active therapeutic combinations, such as trabectedin and radiotherapy, offer potentially higher dimensional response in second-line treatment of advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. Dimensional response can be relevant both for symptom relief and for survival.

Objective

To assess the combined use of trabectedin and radiotherapy in treating patients with progressing metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Phase 1 of this nonrandomized clinical trial followed the classic 3 + 3 design, with planned radiotherapy at a fixed dose of 30 Gy (3 Gy/d for 10 days) and infusion of trabectedin at 1.3 mg/m2 as the starting dose, 1.5 mg/m2 as dose level +1, and 1.1 mg/m2 as dose level -1. Phase 2 followed the Simon optimal 2-stage design. Allowing for type I and II errors of 10%, treatment success was defined as an overall response rate of 35%. This study was conducted in 9 sarcoma referral centers in Spain, France, and Italy from April 13, 2015, to November 20, 2018. Adult patients with progressing metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and having undergone at least 1 previous line of systemic therapy were enrolled. In phase 2, patients fitting inclusion criteria and receiving at least 1 cycle of trabectedin and the radiotherapy regimen constituted the per-protocol population; those receiving at least 1 cycle of trabectedin, the safety population.

Interventions

Trabectedin was administered every 3 weeks in a 24-hour infusion. Radiotherapy was required to start within 1 hour after completion of the first trabectedin infusion (cycle 1, day 2).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The dose-limiting toxic effects of trabectedin (phase 1) and the overall response rate (phase 2) with use of trabectedin plus irradiation in metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas.

Results

Eighteen patients (11 of whom were male) were enrolled in phase 1, and 27 other patients (14 of whom were female) were enrolled in phase 2. The median ages of those enrolled in phases 1 and 2 were 42 (range, 23-74) years and 51 (range, 27-73) years, respectively. In phase 1, dose-limiting toxic effects included grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days in 1 patient at the starting dose level and a grade 4 alanine aminotransferase level increase in 1 of 6 patients at the +1 dose level. In phase 2, among 25 patients with evaluable data, the overall response rate was 72% (95% CI, 53%-91%) for local assessment and 60% (95% CI, 39%-81%) for central assessment.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that the recommended dose of trabectedin for use in combination with this irradiation regimen is 1.5 mg/m2. The trial met its primary end point, with a high overall response rate that indicates the potential of this combination therapy for achieving substantial tumor shrinkage beyond first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic, progressing soft-tissue sarcomas.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02275286.

Incidence of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Cancer and cancer therapies have been associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). However, the incidence of VTE in patients on immunotherapy has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of VTE in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and ascertain its prognostic utility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective study, including all cancer patients treated with anti-Programmed cell Death 1 (PD-1), anti-Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), a combination of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 or a combination including any of these drugs with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents or both between June 2013 and April 2019 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain).

RESULTS

We selected 229 patients. VTE occurred in 16 of 229 patients (7%). VTE occurred more frequently in patients with lung cancer followed by melanoma. Female sex and melanoma were independently associated with an increased risk of VTE. 12 of 16 VTE (75%) were symptomatic. Progressive disease to immunotherapy [HR 31.60 (95% CI 11.44-87.22), p = 0.00], lung cancer [HR 2.55 (95% CI 1.34-4.86), p = 0.00] and melanoma [HR 2.42 (1.20-4.86), p = 0.01] were independently associated with shorter OS. VTE occurrence was not independently associated with shorter OS [HR 1.33 (95% CI 0.63-2.80), p = 0.44].

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of VTE in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy in our study appeared to be similar to the incidence previously reported in other series of cancer patients treated with systemic therapies. VTE occurrence did not correlate with the prognosis. Further and prospective studies are needed to derive definitive conclusions.

Nivolumab and sunitinib combination in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcomas exhibit low expression of factors related to immune response, which could explain the modest activity of PD-1 inhibitors. A potential strategy to convert a cold into an inflamed microenvironment lies on a combination therapy. As tumor angiogenesis promotes immunosuppression, we designed a phase Ib/II trial to test the double inhibition of angiogenesis (sunitinib) and PD-1/PD-L1 axis (nivolumab).

METHODS

This single-arm, phase Ib/II trial enrolled adult patients with selected subtypes of sarcoma. Phase Ib established two dose levels: level 0 with sunitinib 37.5 mg daily from day 1, plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously on day 15, and then every 2 weeks; and level -1 with sunitinib 37.5 mg on the first 14 days (induction) and then 25 mg per day plus nivolumab on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended dose for phase II (phase I) and the 6-month progression-free survival rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (phase II).

RESULTS

From May 2017 to April 2019, 68 patients were enrolled: 16 in phase Ib and 52 in phase II. The recommended dose of sunitinib for phase II was 37.5 mg as induction and then 25 mg in combination with nivolumab. After a median follow-up of 17 months (4-26), the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 48% (95% CI 41% to 55%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events included transaminitis (17.3%) and neutropenia (11.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib plus nivolumab is an active scheme with manageable toxicity in the treatment of selected patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with almost half of patients free of progression at 6 months.Trial registration number NCT03277924.

Are antiangiogenics a good 'partner' for immunotherapy in ovarian cancer?

Ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with poor survival because there are a limited number of effective therapies. Two processes key to OC progression, angiogenesis and immune evasion, act synergistically to promote tumor progression. Tumor-associated angiogenesis promotes immune evasion, and tumor-related immune responses in the peritoneal cavity and tumor microenvironment (TME) affect neovascular formation. Therefore, suppressing the angiogenic pathways could facilitate the arrival of immune effector cells and reduce the presence of myeloid cells involved in immune suppression. To date, clinical studies have shown significant benefits with antiangiogenic therapy as first-line therapy in OC, as well as in recurrent disease, and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab is now an established therapy. Clinical data with immunomodulators in OC are more limited, but suggest that they could benefit some patients with recurrent disease. The preliminary results of two phase III trials have shown that the addition of immunomodulators to chemotherapy does not improve progression-free survival. For this reason, it could be interesting to look for synergistic effects between immunomodulators and other active drugs in OC. Since bevacizumab is approved for use in OC, and is tolerable when used in combination with immunotherapy in other indications, a number of clinical studies are underway to investigate the use of bevacizumab in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in OC. This strategy seeks to normalize the TME via the anti-VEGF actions of bevacizumab, while simultaneously stimulating the immune response via the immunotherapy. Results of these studies are awaited with interest.

Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase II study evaluating bevacizumab, carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Adding bevacizumab to cisplatin-paclitaxel for advanced cervical cancer significantly improves overall and progression-free survival. We evaluated bevacizumab with a widely used carboplatin-paclitaxel backbone.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic/recurrent/persistent cervical cancer not amenable to curative surgery and/or radiotherapy received 3-weekly bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, paclitaxel 175 mg/m², and carboplatin AUC 5 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Maintenance bevacizumab was allowed. Patients with ongoing bladder/rectal involvement, prior cobalt radiotherapy, a history of fistula/gastrointestinal perforation, or recent bowel resection/chemoradiation were excluded. The primary objective was to determine incidences of gastrointestinal perforation/fistula, gastrointestinal-vaginal fistula, and genitourinary fistula.

RESULTS

Among 150 treated patients, disease at study entry was persistent in 21%, recurrent in 56%, and newly diagnosed metastatic in 23%. After 27.8 months' median follow-up, median bevacizumab duration was 6.7 months; 57% received maintenance bevacizumab. Seventeen patients (11.3%; 95% CI: 6.7-17.5%) experienced ≥1 perforation/fistula event: gastrointestinal perforation/fistula in 4.7% (1.9-9.4%), gastrointestinal-vaginal fistula in 4.0% (1.5-8.5%), and genitourinary fistula in 4.7% (1.9-9.4%). Of these, 16 were previously irradiated, several with ongoing radiation effects. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), anemia (19%), and hypertension (14%). Five patients (3%) had fatal adverse events. Objective response rate was 61% (95% CI: 52-69%), median progression-free survival was 10.9 (10.1-13.7) months, and median overall survival was 25.0 (20.9-30.4) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab can be combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel in the CECILIA study population. The fistula/gastrointestinal perforation incidence is in line with GOG-0240; efficacy results are encouraging.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02467907 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

The hallmarks of ovarian cancer: Focus on angiogenesis and micro-environment and new models for their characterisation

Cancers develop by sustained growth, migration and invasion properties of tumour cells, supported by complex interactions with stromal cells within the tumour micro-environment. This review is focused on the latest discoveries regarding the highlighted role of angiogenesis and tumour micro-environment in ovarian cancer. This cancer milieu encompasses non-cancerous cells present in the tumour or nearby, including vessel-forming cells, fibroblasts and immune cells amongst others that work in a cooperative way with cancer cells, impacting tumour behaviour. Angiogenesis, migration and invasion, and more recently immune evasion, are cancer hallmarks clearly dependent on these supporting cells. Moreover, these stromal cells are more genetically stable than tumour cells and thus represent an attractive therapeutic target. A better understanding of the stromal cells function, and their complex interplay with cancer cells, will open additional areas to target, as the tumour-host interface.

Bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: could it be particularly effective in patients with clear cell carcinoma?

PURPOSE

Treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is a challenge, particularly for the clear cell (CCC) subtype. However, there is a preclinical rationale that these patients could achieve a benefit from antiangiogenic therapy. To assess this hypothesis, we used the growth modulation index (GMI), which represents an intrapatient comparison of two successive progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective real-world study performed on 34 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens from January 2009 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was GMI. An established cut-off > 1.33 was defined as a sign of drug activity.

RESULTS

73.5% of patients had high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and 17.7% had CCC; 70.6% of patients received carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab, and 29.4% received weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab. According to histological subtype, the overall response rate and median PFS were 52% and 14 months for HGSOC and 83.3% and 20 months for CCC, respectively. The overall population median GMI was 0.99; it was 0.95 and 2.36 for HGSOC and CCC, respectively. CCC subtype was significantly correlated with GMI > 1.33 (odds ratio 41.67; 95% confidence interval 3.6-486.94; p = .03).

CONCLUSION

Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in recurrent CCC is associated with a remarkable benefit in this cohort. The efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in CCC warrants further prospective evaluation.

Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer - a randomized phase III trial (AGO-OVAR 2.29/ENGOT-ov34)

BACKGROUND

Improvement in clinical outcomes of patients with platinum-resistant disease is an unmet medical need and trials in this population are urgently needed. Checkpoint-inhibitors have already shown activity in multiple other tumor entities and ovarian cancer, especially in the combination with anti-angiogenic treatment.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To test if the activity of non-platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab could be improved by the addition of atezolizumab.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

The addition of atezolizumab to standard non-platinum combination of chemotherapy and bevacizumab improves median overall survival from 15 to 20 months.

TRIAL DESIGN

Patients are randomized to chemotherapy (paclitaxel weekly or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) + bevacizumab + placebo vs chemotherapy + bevacizumab + atezolizumab. Stratification factors are: number of prior lines, planned type of chemotherapy, prior use of bevacizumab, and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status.

MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with up to three prior therapies and a treatment-free interval after platinum of less than 6 months. Patients with three prior lines of chemotherapy are eligible irrespective of the platinum free-interval. A de novo tumor tissue sample biopsy for determination of PD-L1 status prior to randomization for stratification is mandatory. Major exclusion criteria consider bevacizumab-specific and immunotherapy-specific criteria.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Overall survival and progression-free survival are co-primary endpoints.

SAMPLE SIZE

It is planned to randomize 664 patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03353831.

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in the GARNET trial in patients (pts) with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC) treated with dostarlimab

e18032

Background: PRO enable direct measurement of the experiences of patients with cancer. Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapies have shown favorable PRO in lung cancer but a data gap remains in EC. Dostarlimab is an investigational anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody which has shown promising activity in GARNET in advanced mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) EC pts (with an ORR of 42.9% and a disease control rate of 58.6%), and a low incidence of symptomatic grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (anemia [2·9%], colitis [1·9%], and diarrhea [1·9%]). Here, we report on PRO measures collected from pts with dMMR/microsattelite instability high (MSI-H) EC in the single-arm GARNET trial. Methods: Pts with dMMR/MSI-H EC confirmed by local tests, with recurrent or advanced disease that progressed on a platinum regimen were enrolled. Pts received 500 mg Q3W of dostarlimab for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. PRO assessment was an exploratory endpoint and was measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), a validated instrument used to evaluate quality of life, functioning, disease symptoms, and treatment-related side effects. PRO were collected at each dose administration, end of treatment, and follow-up. A mixed-model for repeated measures was used to assess change from baseline, accounting for time and baseline ECOG scores. The threshold to determine clinically meaningful group-level change was ±10 points. Results: PRO data were available for 43 pts. Compliance rates were high at 98%. Relative to baseline, pts reported meaningful improvements in pain, insomnia, and social and emotional functioning over the trial duration. Appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and physical and role functioning were stable over the trial duration. Quality of life and global health status were also maintained. Conclusions: PRO from 43 pts enrolled in the GARNET trial show that disease- and treatment-related symptoms and quality of life are improved or maintained while receiving treatment. These data, along with with the efficacy and safety profile of dostarlimab, strongly support the use of dostarlimab in dMMR/MSI-H advanced EC. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284.

ENGOT-OV44/FIRST study: a randomized, double-blind, adaptive, phase III study of standard of care (SOC) platinum-based therapy ± dostarlimab followed by niraparib ± dostarlimab maintenance as first-line (1L) treatment of stage 3 or 4 ovarian cancer (OC)

TPS6101

Background: Despite surgery and CT (paclitaxel + carboplatin ± bevacizumab [bev]), 5-year survival rates remain low for patients (pts) with FIGO stage 3 or 4 OC. Niraparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that has recently demonstrated efficacy in 1L therapy. Dostarlimab (TSR-042) is an anti-programmed death (PD)-1 humanized monoclonal antibody that has shown clinical activity as monotherapy in early phase trials. The currently enrolling ENGOT-OV44/FIRST study will compare efficacy and safety of CT + dostarlimab + niraparib ± bev (Arm 3) vs CT + niraparib ± bev (Arm 2). Methods: Eligible pts are ≥18 years of age, with FIGO stage 3 or 4 non-mucinous epithelial OC, ECOG performance status < 2, and tumor tissue available for PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) testing. After cycle 1 of CT, pts are stratified by concurrent bev use, BRCA mutation/homologous recombination repair status, and disease burden, then randomized 1:2 into trial Arms 2 and 3 (Table). Dostarlimab is administered at 500 mg IV Q3W during the CT period, then 1000 mg IV Q6W during the maintenance period. Niraparib dosing is 200 mg PO QD for pts with baseline bodyweight (BW) < 77 kg and/or platelet count (PC) < 150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD for pts with baseline BW ≥77 kg and PC ≥150,000/µL. The dual primary endpoints are PFS, based on investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1, in both PD-L1+ and all patients. Initially the study enrolled pts to Arm 1. This arm was discontinued following positive results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 and PAOLA-1/ENGOT-OV25 studies. This allows investigators to offer the current standard of care to all patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03602859, EUDRACT 2018-000413-20. [Table: see text]

Trabectedin and radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma (TRASTS) study: An international, prospective, phase II trial in localized myxoid liposarcoma—A collaborative Spanish (GEIS), Italian (ISG) and French (FSG) group study

11514

Background: Myxoid liposarcoma (ML) exhibits especial sensitivity to trabectedin (T). In prospective series, T showed responses in 44% of patients (pts) with ML. ML is also sensitive to radiation therapy (RT) and preclinical data suggested radiosensitizing properties of T. Preoperative short-course of T with concurrent low-dose RT was conducted in a multicenter, European, phase I/II trial. We present here the data from the phase II part in pts with centralized diagnosis of locally advanced, resectable ML. Methods: Pts received 3 cycles (C) of T in combination with RT (45 Gy) in 25 fractions (1.8Gy/fraction). The phase I part of the study had the classic 3+3 design. Dose Levels for T were: -1 (1.1 mg/m2), 1 (1.3 mg/m2) and 2 (1.5 mg/m2) Results were already reported (EClincalMedicine 2019;9:35-43) and the dose selected for the phase 2 part was 1.5 mg/m2. RECIST responses were evaluated preoperatively at week 10. Surgical specimens were processed for histologic changes and residual tumor. Results: From July 2016 to September 2019, 47 pts (M/F 31/16) with median age 43y (18-77) and median tumor size 11 cm (3-25 cm), 20 low and 24 high grade (3 not available) were enrolled in the phase II part of the study. The major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (21.3%), ALT (14.9%), GGT (8.5%) and AST (8.5%) elevation. There were no deaths due to toxicity. 43/47 patients received the planned 3 pre-operative T cycles. All pts completed RT. 1 patient started RT before the first cycle of T and was excluded from the analysis. All pts were evaluable for response: 14 achieved PR (30%), 32 SD (70%). All pts underwent surgery (37 [86%] R0/ 5 [12%] R1/ 1 [2%] R2/ 3 not available). Median viable residual tumor was 10% (0-90) with 23/43 pts (53%) with ≤ 10% viable remaining tumor. Of them 6/43 (14%) had complete responses. At a median FU of 18 months (3-41) one pt developed local recurrence and 2 distant metastases. No deaths were observed. The corresponding 2-yr disease-free survival and overall survival were 97% (95% confidence interval 95-100) and 100%. Conclusions: T in combination with RT was feasible and well tolerated in the preoperative setting. The activity of the combination compares favorably with the administration of T/RT alone. This regimen could potentially become an alternative to anthracycline+ifosfamide concurrent to RT in high risk localized ML. Clinical trial information: NCT02275286 .

IMMUNOSARC: a collaborative Spanish (GEIS) and Italian (ISG) sarcoma groups phase I/II trial of sunitinib and nivolumab in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcoma: Results from the phase II part, bone sarcoma cohort

11522

Background: Herein, we present the results of the cohort on advanced bone sarcoma patients of the phase II part of the IMMUNOSARC study (NCT03277924), a European multicentre phase I-II trial aimed at investigating the activity of the combination of sunitinib (SU) and nivolumab (NI) in selected advanced sarcoma subtypes. Methods: Adult, pre-treated, progressing patients, ECOG 0-1, with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma, high-grade bone sarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma or dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma were eligible. SU 37.5 mg/day as induction was given days 1-14 and then reduced to 25mg/day continuously. NI was administered at 3 mg/Kg every 2 weeks from week 3. SU-NI was maintained up to progression or intolerance. Primary end-point was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 6 months (H1: PFSR 6-months: 15%). Secondary end-points: overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v 1.1 and toxicity. Results: From Nov 2017 to Dec 2018, 40 eligible patients were included: (M/F = 27/13), median age 47 years (range 21-74), ECOG 0 in 11 (27%) cases, 36 (90%) were metastatic, 4 (10%) locally advanced. Histology: 17 osteosarcomas (43%), 14 chondrosarcomas (35%) (4 dedifferentiated), 8 Ewing sarcomas (20%), 1 bone undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2%). PFSR at 6 months based on local evaluation was 32%. At a median FU of 12.5 months (2-26), median PFS was 3.7 months (95% IC 3.4-4) while median OS was 14.2 months (95%CI: 7.1-21.3). OS rate at 3 and 6 months were 87% and 73%, respectively. ORR by RECIST: 1 CR (2.5%) (1 patient with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, lasting 22 months and on going), 1 PR (2.5%) (1 patient with osteosarcoma, lasting 5.7 months), 22 SD (55%, lasting > 6 months in 45% of the cases) and 16 PD (40%). G3/5 toxicities are detailed in Table. Conclusions: The trial met its primary endpoint in the cohort of patients with advanced bone sarcoma, with > 30% of patients free from progression at 6 months. Pre-planned tumor microenvironment genomic, exploratory analysis on pre and post-treatment tumor samples is on going. Clinical trial information: NCT03277924 . [Table: see text]

SEOM clinical guidelines for cervical cancer (2019)

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, strongly linked to high-risk human papilloma virus infection. In high-income countries, the screening programs have dramatically decreased the incidence of CC; however, the lack of accessibility to them in developing countries makes CC an important cause of mortality. Clinical stage is the most relevant prognostic factor in CC. The new FIGO staging system published in 2018 is more accurate than the previous one since it takes into account the lymph node status. In early stages, the primary treatment is surgery-with some concerns recently raised regarding minimally invasive surgery because it might decrease survival-or radiotherapy, whereas concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the conventional approach in locally advanced stages. For recurrent or metastatic CC, the combination of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is the preferred therapy. Immunotherapy approach based on checkpoint inhibitors is evolving as the election therapy following failure to platinum therapy.