Bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: could it be particularly effective in patients with clear cell carcinoma?

Differential molecular pathway expression according to chemotherapeutic response in ovarian clear cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a distinct entity from epithelial ovarian cancer. The prognosis of advanced and recurrent disease is very poor due to resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Our aim was to explore the molecular alterations among OCCC patients with different chemotherapeutic responses and to obtain insights into potential biomarkers.

METHODS

Twenty-four OCCC patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the relapse time after the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: the platinum-sensitive group (PS) and the platinum-resistant group (PR). Gene expression profiling was performed using NanoString nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel.

RESULTS

Gene expression analysis comparing PR vs. PS identified 32 differentially expressed genes: 17 upregulated genes and 15 downregulated genes. Most of these genes are involved in the PI3K, MAPK and Cell Cycle-Apoptosis pathways. In particular, eight genes are involved in two or all three pathways.

CONCLUSION

The dysregulated genes in the PI3K, MAPK, and Cell Cycle-Apoptosis pathways identified and postulated mechanisms could help to probe biomarkers of OCCC platinum sensitivity, providing a research basis for further exploration of targeted therapy.

The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives

•

The progression-free survival (PFS) ratio represents a meaningful outcome measure.

•

The median PFS-ratio differs significantly between histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma.

•

Thresholds for clinical benefit should be adjusted for clinicopathological factors.

•

Treatment response during PFS1 may result in a distorted view of the PFS-ratio.

Objective

Clinical efficacy of cytostatic anticancer agents can be determined with the progression-free survival (PFS) ratio. This outcome measure compares PFS achieved by a new treatment (PFS2) to the PFS of the most recent treatment on which the patient has experienced progression (PFS1). Clinical benefit has been defined as a PFS-ratio (PFS2/PFS1) > 1.3. However, in order to demonstrate significant benefit, trial designs require an assumption on the proportion of patients who reach this ratio during palliative options. For ovarian carcinoma, data is lacking to support this assumption. Therefore in this study, we assess the PFS-ratio in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients treated with current palliative options.

Methods

We included 67 patients with recurrent high-grade serous (HGSC, 73.1%) or low-grade (LGOC, 26.9%) ovarian carcinoma. We determined the median PFS-ratio and investigated the association with clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

Overall, we observed a median PFS-ratio of 0.69. The proportion of patients with a PFS-ratio > 1.3 was 22.4%. For HGSC patients, the median PFS-ratio was significantly lower than for LGOC patients (respectively, 0.58 and 1.26, p = 0.007). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the LGOC subtype and CA125 tumor marker concentration were independent factors related to a PFS-ratio > 1.3.

Conclusions

Although the PFS-ratio represents a meaningful outcome measure in studies investigating cytostatic anticancer agents, we conclude that it is influenced by tumor histology and biological behavior. In future research, these factors should be taken into account when determining thresholds for clinical benefit in trial designs.

Sintilimab combined with bevacizumab in relapsed/persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (INOVA): an investigator-initiated, multicentre clinical trial-a study protocol of clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) has an abysmal prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of 25.3 months because of a low response to chemotherapy. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate after recurrence is 13.2%, with more than two-thirds of the patients dying within a year. Therefore, it is urgent to explore new therapeutic options for OCCC. Based on the characteristic immune-suppressive tumour microenvironment derived from the gene expression profile of OCCC, the combination of immunoantiangiogenesis therapy might have certain efficacy in recurrent/persistent OCCC. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab and bevacizumab in patients who have failed platinum-containing chemotherapy with recurrent or persistent OCCC.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

In this multicentre, single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated clinical trial, 38 patients will be assigned to receive sintilimab 200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The eligibility criteria include histologically diagnosed patients with recurrent or persistent OCCC who have been previously treated with at least one-line platinum-containing chemotherapy; patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 with an expected survival greater than 12 weeks. The exclusion criteria include patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor and patients with contraindications of bevacizumab and sintilimab. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, time to response, duration of response, disease control rate, OS, safety and quality of life. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Research Ethics Commission of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2020-S337). The protocol of this study is registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04735861; Clinicaltrials. gov.

Bevacizumab in First-Line Chemotherapy Improves Progression-Free Survival for Advanced Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma

Simple Summary

We investigated survival outcomes following first-line chemotherapy before and after approval of bevacizumab for ovarian cancer in Japan to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab for advanced clear cell carcinoma. We investigated 28 consecutive patients diagnosed with clear cell carcinoma (stages III/IV) at our hospital between 2008 and 2018. Bevacizumab was administered for treatment after approval in Japan in November 2013. Progression-free survival was compared between 10 patients treated before bevacizumab approval (2008–2013,) and 18 patients treated after Bev approval (2014–2018) for first-line chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival increased from 12.0 months before bevacizumab approval to 29.8 months after bevacizumab approval (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.026). Multivariate analysis showed that performance status (p = 0.049), bevacizumab administration (p = 0.023) and completeness of resection (p = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. Bevacizumab incorporated into first-line chemotherapy might improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced clear cell carcinoma.

Abstract

(1) Background: We investigated survival outcomes following first-line chemotherapy before and after approval of bevacizumab (Bev) for ovarian cancer in Japan to evaluate the efficacy of Bev for advanced clear cell carcinoma (CCC). (2) Methods: We investigated 28 consecutive patients diagnosed with CCC (stages III/IV) at our hospital between 2008 and 2018. Bev was administered for treatment of advanced CCC after approval in Japan in November 2013. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between 10 patients treated before Bev approval (2008–2013, Bev- group) and 18 patients treated after Bev approval (2014–2018, Bev+ group) for first-line chemotherapy. (3) Results: No intergroup difference was observed in patient characteristics. The rate of completeness of resection was higher in the Bev − group (9/10, 90%) than in the Bev+ group (15/18, 83%) (p = 0.044). Eleven (61%) patients in the Bev + group received ≥ 21 cycles of Bev. The median PFS increased from 12.0 months before Bev approval to 29.8 months after Bev approval (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.026). Multivariate analysis showed that performance status (p = 0.049), Bev administration (p = 0.023) and completeness of resection (p = 0.023) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. (4) Conclusions: Bev incorporated into first-line chemotherapy might improve PFS in patients with advanced CCC. We hope that our findings will be confirmed in adequate clinical trials.