Rapid discontinuation of steroids in living donor kidney transplantation: a pilot study

Prediction of acute renal allograft rejection in early post-transplantation period by soluble CD30

To evaluate the feasibility of serum sCD30 for prediction of acute graft rejection, we analyzed clinical data of 231 patients, whose serum levels of sCD30 were detected by ELISA before and after transplantation. They were divided into three groups: acute rejection group (AR, n = 49), uncomplicated course group (UC, n = 171) and delayed graft function group (DGF, n = 11). Preoperative sCD30 levels of three groups were 183 +/- 74, 177 +/- 82 and 168 +/- 53 U/ml, respectively (P = 0.82). Significant decrease of sCD30 was detected in three groups on day 5 and 10 post-transplantation respectively (52 +/- 30 and 9 +/- 5 U/ml respectively, P < 0.001). Compared with Group UC and DGF, patients of Group AR had higher sCD30 values on day 5 post-transplantation (92 +/- 27 U/ml vs. 41 +/- 20 U/ml and 48 +/- 18 U/ml, P < 0.001). However, sCD30 levels on day 10 post-transplantation were virtually similar in patients of three groups (P = 0.43). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated that sCD30 level on day 5 post-transplantation could differentiate patients who subsequently suffered acute allograft rejection from others (area under ROC curve 0.95). According to ROC curve, 65 U/ml may be the optimal operational cut-off level to predict impending graft rejection (specificity 91.8%, sensitivity 87.1%). Measurement of soluble CD30 on day 5 post-transplantation might offer a noninvasive means to recognize patients at risk of impending acute graft rejection during early post-transplantation period.

Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients on Steroid-Avoidance Immunosuppression Receiving Induction With Either Antithymocyte Globulin or Basiliximab

Immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids, usually with induction therapy, is safe in kidney transplant recipients. In 89 patients, we induced immunosuppression with basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (17 and 72 patients, respectively). Selection criteria for basiliximab were age (>or=65 years), history (malignancy; chronic infection), and type 1 diabetes mellitus (eligible for pancreas transplant). Steroids were administered through posttransplantation day 4 (five doses); maintenance immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. At last follow-up (average, 286 days), most patients were steroid-free (antithymocyte globulin, 90%; basiliximab, 88%). Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 4, and 12 months posttransplantation. The overall risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 12%. At 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection-free survival was 93% for antithymocyte globulin, 65% for basiliximab (P<.001). Median time to biopsy-proven acute rejection was 27 and 71 days, respectively. The low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with steroid-avoidance immunosuppression may be further reduced with antithymocyte globulin.

Living or deceased donor kidney transplants for candidates with significant extrarenal morbidity

BACKGROUND

Individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) must weigh the benefits and risks of dialysis vs. a transplant. However, if the patient has extrarenal morbidity, survival may be limited. We have recommended that, when possible, recipients have a living donor (LD) transplant. However, it could be argued that for recipients with extrarenal morbidity, the potential benefit does not justify the donor risks and that, therefore, recipients with increased risks should be denied an LD transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the outcome of LD vs. deceased donor (DD) transplants in recipients with extrarenal morbidity. For recipients with extrarenal morbidity, patient survival (p < 0.01) and graft survival (p < 0.01) rates were significantly better for LD (vs. DD) transplant recipients. We found no difference in death-censored graft survival rates.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplant recipients with extrarenal morbidity benefit from an LD transplant. Both donor and recipient informed consent is important.

Graft Loss from Recurrent Glomerulonephritis Is Not Increased with a Rapid Steroid Discontinuation Protocol

BACKGROUND

The risk of recurrence of glomerulonephritis in kidney transplant recipients on a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression protocol is unknown.

METHODS

We studied the 4-year graft and patient survival in 105 adult kidney transplant recipients who received their transplant for glomerulonephritis (GN) and were treated with a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone for 5 days (group 1). We compared these outcomes to two control groups; 439 concurrent recipients who received a transplant for causes other than GN (group 2) and to 260 kidney transplant recipients who received an allograft for GN between 1994 and 1999 and were maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive protocol (group 3).

RESULTS

The 4-year graft and patient survival were similar in the three groups. Acute rejection-free survival was also similar. Serial annual serum creatinine and estimated GFR were also comparable amongst the three groups. Two grafts were lost in group 1 from biopsy-proven recurrent GN and eight other subjects had evidence of histological recurrence at 11.2+/-11.9 months. Seven grafts were lost for recurrent disease in group 3 and 15 others had evidence of histological recurrence at 29.1+/-32.6 months. The mean time to graft loss from recurrence was 52+/-22 months.

CONCLUSION

A regimen that utilizes rapid discontinuation of steroids conveys no added risk of graft loss from recurrent GN in the short term but longer follow-up is needed. A consideration should be made to discontinue corticosteroids in the potential recipients who are on them at the time of transplantation.

Toxicity-sparing protocols using mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

The introduction of triple-therapy regimens that include a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), steroids, and azathioprine greatly reduced the risk of acute rejection in renal transplantation. However, the long-term use of both CNIs and steroids is associated with serious toxicities that ultimately can impact patient/graft survival. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a highly effective immunosuppressant with no known nephrotoxicity, has been shown to provide benefits in preserving long-term renal allograft function relative to azathioprine. For these reasons, MMF has become an integral component of toxicity-sparing maintenance regimens that seek to minimize patient exposure to CNIs and steroids. This paper provides an overview of current strategies for reducing the toxicities associated with these agents, which include both withdrawal and avoidance regimens with or without induction therapy. Data are accumulating that toxicity-sparing regimens involving MMF are safe and decrease the risk of side effects that accompany the use of CNIs and steroids. Future studies will determine how to best implement these regimens in the renal transplant population.

Preliminary results with early corticosteroid withdrawal in African American renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding the use of steroid-avoidance immunosuppression (SAI) in African American (AA) renal allograft recipients, traditionally considered a high-risk subgroup of patients with higher reported rates of acute rejection and graft loss.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of 27 AA renal allograft recipients receiving SAI (SA group; mean follow-up period, 12 +/- 3 mo) with those of 20 patients receiving a steroid taper (ST group; 24 +/- 11 mo). In both groups, thymoglobulin was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus were used for maintenance. Four doses of methylprednisolone were given on days 0 to 3. In the SA group no further steroids were given, whereas in the ST group a prednisone taper was continued thereafter.

RESULTS

ST patients were more likely to have current panel reactive antibody titers greater than 10%, undergo retransplantation, and receive more doses of thymoglobulin. There were no significant differences between the SA and ST groups with regard to patient survival (96% vs 95%), graft survival (96% vs 90%), acute rejection (11% vs 14%), cytomegalovirus infection (7% vs 10%), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (11% vs 24%), or mean serum creatinine concentration at 6 months (1.6 vs 1.5 mg/dL), respectively, with a trend toward less percent weight gain in SA patients at 6 months (5% vs 11%, P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

SAI can produce excellent short-term results in AA kidney transplant patients when compared with a conventional ST protocol. Our results will need to be verified in larger numbers of patients with longer follow-up evaluation.

Comparison of Steroid Avoidance in Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Combination in Kidney Transplantation Monitored by Surveillance Biopsy

BACKGROUND

Chronic steroid therapy in kidney transplantation has myriad side effects and steroid avoidance has become feasible. This prospective study compared the safety and efficacy of steroid avoidance in tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and TAC/sirolimus (SRL) combinations in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In all, 150 kidney recipients were analyzed: 75 each in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups. The primary endpoint was acute rejection. Surveillance biopsies were completed to analyze subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Acute rejection and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. Two-year patient and graft survival, renal function, and adverse effects were monitored.

RESULTS

Acute rejection was seen in 12% of TAC/MMF and 8% of TAC/SRL patients. Two-year actuarial patient survival was 95% and 97%, and graft survival 90% and 90% in TAC/MMF and TAC/SRL groups, respectively. Surveillance biopsy showed cumulative incidence of SCAR was 27 % in TAC/MMF and 16 % in TAC/SRL groups at 2 years (P = 0.04). Overall, 33% of recipients in TAC/MMF and 20% in TAC/SRL received methylprednisolone for acute rejection/SCAR. Moderate/severe CAN was 10% in TAC/SRL group and 22% in TAC/MMF group(P = 0.06). New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) was 4% each in both groups. All recipients remain free of maintenance steroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid avoidance in tacrolimus-based immunosuppression with MMF or SRL provides equivalent 2-year patient and graft survival with a low incidence of acute rejection and NODM. SCAR and CAN are lower in TAC/SRL compared to TAC/MMF group. The impact of decreased SCAR and CAN in TAC/SRL group on longer-term graft survival and function is to be evaluated.

Early discontinuation of steroids is safe and effective in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

In pediatric kidney transplantation, steroid induced growth retardation and cushingoid features are of particular concern. In children, gradual steroid withdrawal late after kidney transplantation increases the risk of rejection. In this pilot study, we investigated the outcome of pediatric renal transplantation with an early steroid withdrawal protocol. This is a retrospective case-control study of pediatric renal transplants with age-matched historical control. Groups were comparable in terms of HLA matching, donor type and graft ischemia time. In the steroid withdrawal group (SWG, n = 13), induction therapy included mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a 5-day course of steroids with Thymoglobulin in 11 and basiliximab in two other patients. In the steroid group (SG, n = 13), in addition to steroids, four patients were given basiliximab, eight were given Thymoglobulin, and one OKT3. Maintenance therapy included tacrolimus (SWG n = 11, SG n = 3) or cyclosporine (SWG n = 2, SG n = 10). Azathioprine was given to all the patients in the SG, except the last two patients of this series who were prescribed MMF. MMF was given to all in the SWG. Patient and graft survival rates were 100% in both groups. In the SWG, no acute rejection episode was detected. In the steroid group, three patients (25%) presented with an acute rejection episode. All but one patient in either group showed immediate graft function. Patients in the steroid-withdrawal group exhibited a significantly higher creatinine clearance at 6 and 12 months post-transplant (95.8 +/- 23.3 vs. 71.3 +/- 21.9, p = 0.03; and 91.3 +/- 21.6 vs. 69.6 +/- 28.6, p = 0.04). In the SWG delta BMI was significantly lower and delta height Z score was significantly higher, and we observed significantly less hyperlipidemia, body disfigurement, and need for anti-hypertensive medication. Early steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant recipients is efficacious and safe and does not increase risk of rejection, preserving optimal growth and renal function, and reducing cardiovascular risk factors.

A prospective randomized trial of steroid-free maintenance regimens in kidney transplant recipients--an interim analysis

We compared three maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in a rapid discontinuation of prednisone protocol. From March 1, 2001, through December 31, 2003, 239 first and second kidney transplant recipients (166 LD; 73 DD) were randomized. All recipients were treated with Thymoglobulin; all received steroids intraoperatively and for 5 days postoperatively. Randomization was to cyclosporine-mycophenolate mofetil (n = 85); high-level tacrolimus (TAC) (8-12 ng/mL)-low-level sirolimus (SRL) (3-7 ng/mL) (n = 72); or low-level TAC (3-7 ng/mL)-high-level SRL (8-12 ng/mL) (n = 82). We found no difference at 24 months between groups in patient, graft, death-censored graft, or acute rejection-free graft survival, or in kidney function. Wound complications were more common in SRL-treated recipients (p = 0.02); we found no other differences between groups in complication rates. Our data suggest that excellent patient and graft survival and low rejection rates can be obtained using a variety of maintenance protocols without prednisone.

Corticosteroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation

Corticosteroids have played a central role in the evolution of renal transplant as the modality of choice for renal replacement in end stage kidney disease. Their use is associated with significant, dose related morbidity including osseous, cardiovascular, metabolic complications, body disfigurement and growth retardation in children. The strategies that have been employed to minimize these side effects include reduction in the daily administered dose of steroids, use of alternate day dosing regimens, steroid withdrawal post-transplantation and complete steroid avoidance. Steroid dose minimization has been associated with increased rates of acute rejection, though introduction of newer and more potent immunosuppressives has helped reduce the incidence of this complication. Steroid minimization will benefit patient morbidity due to cataracts, cardiovascular and osseous complications, but may offer little benefit towards improving linear growth. Alternate day steroid therapy may have a greater impact on growth improvement, but may be troubled by regimen non-adherence. Steroid withdrawal post-transplant, the ultimate target, is successful in a cohort of patients, but overall, has been historically associated with unacceptably high rates of clinical acute rejection, and has thus been used sparingly in adults and even less so in children. Complete corticosteroid avoidance, using newer induction and immunosuppressive agents, has been associated with an 8-23% incidence of acute rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients, significant catch-up growth post-transplant, improvements in post-transplant hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and a high safety profile at current follow-up. Newer induction protocols may allow complete steroid-free immunosuppression thus offering significant advantages in preventing the above-mentioned steroid related morbidity, which could also possibly be applicable to other areas of solid organ transplantation in all age groups.

Corticosteroid avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation: can it be achieved?

Corticosteroids have been a cornerstone therapy in renal transplantation, which is the treatment modality of choice for adult and pediatric end-stage renal disease. Their use is associated with significant morbidity, notably cardiovascular, endocrine, and bone complications, body disfiguration, and almost universal growth retardation in children. While newer immunosuppressants have reduced the incidence of these adverse effects, they continue to pose significant post-transplant challenges. There are various strategies that can be used to avoid these adverse effects including the use of an alternative corticosteroid such as deflazacort, minimization of corticosteroid dosage, corticosteroid withdrawal after a period of early use, and more recently complete corticosteroid avoidance. Recent randomized studies have demonstrated significant improvement in growth parameters, lipid profile, and in the amount of bone loss in patients treated with deflazacort, an oxazoline analog of prednisone, compared with methylprednisone.Corticosteroid minimization has been associated with an increased rate of acute rejection. While augmentation with newer immunosuppressants has helped reduce the incidence of acute rejection, significant improvements in growth have not been demonstrated. Alternate-day corticosteroid therapy has been shown to have a beneficial effect on growth but regimen compliance has limited its widespread applicability. Studies of corticosteroid withdrawal have met with varied success. Early corticosteroid withdrawal has been associated with rejection rates ranging from 10% to 81% and late corticosteroid withdrawal, from 13% to 68.8%, with acute rejection episodes occurring as late as 4 years after corticosteroid withdrawal. The rates of clinical acute rejection have been unacceptably high, and corticosteroid withdrawal is thus used very sparingly in adults and even less so in children. Complete corticosteroid avoidance as reported by an initial study has been associated with a 23% incidence of acute rejection and 'catch-up' growth post-transplantation in 14 pediatric recipients, as measured by the change in height standard deviation scores post-transplantation. A second renal transplant study, in adults, demonstrated similar rejection rates of 25% with improvement in post-transplant hypertension and lipid profiles. A more recent pediatric study using a novel extended daclizumab induction protocol demonstrated an 8% incidence of clinical acute rejection with significant improvements in graft function, hypertension, and growth, without an increased incidence of infectious complications. Renal transplantation with a corticosteroid-free protocol may offer significant advantages in the incidence of acute rejection, graft function, growth, blood pressure, lipidemia, and body appearance and appears to be well tolerated when used with a variety of current induction protocols to replace early corticosteroid use. This protocol may also be applicable to other areas of solid organ transplantation in all age groups.

Evolution of immunosuppression at the University of Minnesota

Immunosuppressive protocols at the University of Minnesota have evolved from identical immunosuppression for all recipients (prednisone, azathioprine, and antilymphocyte globulin) to differing protocols for living (triple therapy) and cadaver (sequential therapy) donor recipients, and then to our current protocol in which all recipients receive induction therapy with rapid discontinuation of prednisone. At the same time, progress has been made in the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection along with numerous parallel improvements in patient care, including in anesthesia, dialysis, and intensive care unit care. The net result has been an incremental improvement in recipient and graft survival.

Current and future immunosuppressive strategies in renal transplantation

The past decade has witnessed the introduction of several new immunosuppressive agents. The availability of these new pharmacologic offerings has not diminished the challenge of achieving a balance of adequate graft protection while minimizing the consequences of excessive immunosuppression. For renal transplant recipients, maintenance immunosuppression generally consists of a calcineurin inhibitor in combination with an antiproliferative agent and a corticosteroid; more recently, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have been used. Excellent results have been achieved at many transplant centers with combinations of these agents in a variety of protocols. Regimens designed to limit or eliminate calcineurin inhibitor and/or corticosteroid therapy are actively being pursued in the transplant community. Allograft tolerance and xenotransplantation are being studied, and the knowledge gained from the effort may help in the development of innovative strategies and new immunosuppressive agents.

Rapid Discontinuation of Prednisone in Higher-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

Prednisone-minimization protocols have been successful in low-risk recipients. We report on the use of a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 79) at increased immunologic risk. Our data suggests that such recipients should not be excluded from prednisone-minimization protocols.

Two-day induction with thymoglobulin in kidney transplantation: risks and benefits

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to develop an induction protocol to reduce allograft rejection with fewer posttransplant infections and malignancies.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized study, a T- and B-cell depletion protocol, consisting of IV thymoglobulin (ATG 5 mg/kg/d) plus methylprednisolone (500 mg/d) plus azathiopurine (2 mg/kg/d), was on days 0 and 1 after renal transplantation. CyA was introduced at day 3.39 among patients undergoing either primary living related (n = 16) or cadaveric (n = 23) transplants excluding recipients of full-HLA-matched sibling, or five- and six-HLA-matched cadaveric donor kidneys. The adequacy of immunosuppression was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis for total, CD3+ (T-cell), and CD19+ (B-cell) lymphocytes.

RESULTS

The acute rejection rate was 6% and 37/39 patients are alive with functioning grafts at an average follow-up of 14.5 months. The overall patient and graft survival rate was 95%. Their mean creatinine value was 1.27 mg/dL. Six patients (16%) required hospitalization due to serious infections. The two deaths were attributed to septicemia and brain abcess caused by unusual agents, namely, Rhodococcus equi and Sporobolomyces. One patient presented with a cutaneous Kaposi sarcoma in the 11th month posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

A Two-day induction protocol with thymoglobulin yields acceptable acute rejection rates among renal transplants. However, caution is necessary for adverse events, particularly atypical bacterial and fungal infections.

Long-term immunosuppression, without maintenance prednisone, after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Concern exists that prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients will increase acute and/or chronic rejection.

METHODS

From October 1, 1999, through February 29, 2004, at our center, 477 kidney transplant recipients (341 living donor, 136 cadaver) discontinued prednisone on postoperative day 6, per our protocol. Immunosuppression consisted of polyclonal antibody (Thymoglobulin) for 5 days, prednisone intraoperatively and for 5 days, a calcineurin inhibitor, and either sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. We compared outcome with that of historical controls who did not discontinue prednisone.

RESULTS

The recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had excellent 4-year actuarial patient survival (92%), graft survival (90%), acute rejection-free graft survival (86%), and chronic rejection-free graft survival (95%). The mean serum creatinine level (+/- SD) at 1 year was 1.6 +/- 0.6; at 4 years, 1.6 +/- 0.6. We noted that 8% of recipients had cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease; 4.5%, fractures; 2.8%, cataracts; 1%, posttransplant diabetes; 0.2%, avascular necrosis; 0.2%, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease; and 0%, polyomavirus. In all, 85% of kidney recipients with functioning grafts remain prednisone-free as of April 1, 2004. As compared with historical controls, the recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had better patient (P = 0.02) and graft survival (P < 0.0001) and lower rates of acute (P = 0.0004) and chronic (P = 0.02) rejection. In addition, they had a significantly lower rate of CMV disease (P < 0.0001), cataracts (P < 0.0001), posttransplant diabetes (P < 0.0001), and avascular necrosis (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prednisone-related side effects can be minimized without maintenance immunosuppression; our prednisone-free recipients do not have increased acute or chronic rejection.

Immunosuppression: practice and trends

Over the past decade, immunosuppression therapy has undergone striking changes in the scale and pace by which new immunosuppressive molecules and antibodies have become incorporated into daily transplant medicine. An organ-by-organ review of data reveals several trends. The highest use of induction therapy (over 70% of patients) was reported for simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) and pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants in 2002; use of induction therapy was less common in liver transplants (only 18%). Corticosteroids served as discharge maintenance immunosuppression in over 87% of the recipients of kidney, SPK, PAK and thoracic transplants, and in over 70% of pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients. Corticosteroid use in intestine transplants was reported in 64% of recipients in 2002. A shift in the calcineurin inhibitor used for maintenance immunosuppression from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for the majority of patients had occurred for kidney, PAK, SPK, PTA, liver, lung, and heart-lung by 2001. For heart transplants, cyclosporine remained the calcineurin inhibitor of choice; tacrolimus remained the predominant calcineurin inhibitor agent for intestine (since 1994). Use of antibody treatment for rejection during the first post-transplant year for most organs declined. Short-term outcomes have improved, based on the observation that rates of rejection within the first year post-transplant have diminished.

Nonsustained effect of short-term bisphosphonate therapy on bone turnover three years after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

We recently showed that two doses of 4 mg of zoledronic acid (ZOL) ameliorated the bone loss and improved bone histology within the first six months after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether this early short-term intervention exhibited a sustained bone-sparing effect.

METHODS

A homogenous group of 20 de novo renal transplant recipients were equally randomized to two infusions of 4 mg of ZOL or placebo at two weeks and three months after engraftment. Patients were followed up for three years by sequential determination of bone densitometry and specific biochemical markers.

RESULTS

From month six to three years after transplantation, both treatment groups exhibited an improvement of bone mineralization. Femoral neck bone mineral density z-scores increased statistically significantly from -1.3 (2.6) to -0.2 (3.6) in the placebo group and from -1.6 (2.9) to -1.2 (1.9) in the ZOL group (median, range). Biochemical parameters of osteoblast activity such as osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase did not increase significantly in both groups. Osteoprotegerin, a marker of osteoclast inhibition, was significantly elevated over the first six months in the ZOL group, but decreased to similar levels, as in the placebo group, over the next two and a half years. Other markers of osteoclast activity such as c-telopeptide of type 1 collagen, calcitonin, and intact parathyroid hormone were not different between six months and three years in either group.

CONCLUSION

The early bone-sparing effect of short-term ZOL therapy confers no sustained benefit versus placebo at three year post-transplantation.

A prospective, randomized, clinical trial of intraoperative versus postoperative Thymoglobulin in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is frequently observed in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Previous retrospective or nonrandomized studies have suggested that intraoperative administration of polyclonal antithymocyte preparations may reduce the incidence of DGF, possibly by decreasing ischemia-reperfusion injury.

METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized study of Thymoglobulin induction therapy in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Between January 2001 and January 2002, 58 adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative or postoperative Thymoglobulin induction therapy. Three to six doses of Thymoglobulin (1 mg/kg/dose) were administered during the first week posttransplant. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus (54 of 58) or cyclosporine A (4 of 58), steroids, and mycophenolate mofetil. DGF was defined by the requirement for hemodialysis within the first week posttransplant.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in recipient demographics, donor age, cold ischemia time, or total number of doses of Thymoglobulin administered. Intraoperative Thymoglobulin administration was associated with significantly less DGF and a lower mean serum creatinine on postoperative days 10 and 14 (P<0.05). Posttransplant length of stay was also significantly shorter for the intraoperative Thymoglobulin patient group. The acute rejection rate was also lower in the intraoperative treatment group but this did not achieve statistical significance. There was no difference in the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that intraoperative Thymoglobulin administration, in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients, is associated with a significant decrease in DGF, better early allograft function in the first month posttransplant, and a decreased posttransplant hospital length of stay.

New approaches to transplant immunosuppression

Although considerable progress has been achieved using immunosuppressive drugs that inhibit lymphocyte activation and T-cell cytokine signal transduction pathways, the widespread tissue distribution of the molecular targets exploited to date, calcineurin, mammalian target of rapamycin, and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, engenders a constellation of collateral toxicities. One strategy to develop new immunosuppressants seeks to identify targets that are critical for and specific to the adaptive immune response. Three approaches have been used to guide this enterprise; molecular design based on steric resemblance of the antagonist to the natural ligand; construction of complementary DNA oligonucleotides that hybridize with the leader sequence of messenger RNA encoding the synthesis of the specific target, thereby preventing production of that protein; and functional comparisons based on similar inhibitory profiles of candidate compounds and a probe that blocks the target nonselectively. Use of these 3 technologies has led to identification of antagonists blocking selectins, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, or Janus kinase 3, respectively. These lead compounds have been tested for their effects on the alloimmune response and/or the ischemia-reperfusion injuries.

Outcomes in kidney transplantation

It is estimated that there are greater than 100000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control. Tacrolimus compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient.

A prospective study of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: comparison of two maintenance immunosuppression protocols: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus

BACKGROUND

We examined the feasibility of rapid corticosteroid elimination in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Forty consecutive simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective study in which antithymocyte globulin induction and 6 days of corticosteroids were administered along with tacrolimus and MMF (n=20) or tacrolimus and sirolimus (n=20). Mean+/-SD follow-up for recipients receiving tacrolimus/MMF and tacrolimus/sirolimus were 12.7+/-3.9 and 13.4+/-2.9 months, respectively. Patient and graft survival, and rejection rates were compared to an historical control group (n=86; mean follow-up 41.5+/-15.4 months) of SPK recipients that received induction and tacrolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of recipient and donor variables were similar among all groups. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the 40 SPK transplant recipients with rapid corticosteroid elimination were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively. In the historical control group the 1-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 96.5, 93.0, and 91.9%, respectively. The 1-year rejection-free survival rate recipients in the rapid steroid elimination group collectively was 97.5 vs 80.2% in the historical control group (P=0.034). At 6 and 12 months posttransplant the serum creatinine values remained stable in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that chronic corticosteroid exposure is not required in SPK transplant recipients receiving antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immuno-suppression consisting of either tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus and sirolimus.