Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy and long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation

Hypertension (HTN) is common in pediatric recipients following kidney transplantation (KT). We retrospectively assessed the impact of HTN on long-term (>10-yr) outcomes in pediatric KT recipients (aged < 18 yr) at our center. Two hundred and ninety-three pediatric KT recipients (83% living donor [LD]) with graft survival (GS) for ≥5 yr were studied. HTN was defined by antihypertensive medication use at five yr post-KT. One hundred and sixty (55%) recipients did not have HTN, and 133 (45%) had HTN at five yr post-KT. There were no differences in actuarial patient survival between cohorts. Actuarial GS at 15 and 20 yr was 68% and 53% for recipients without HTN, and 53% and 33% for recipients with HTN (p = 0.006). Among LD recipients using one antihypertensive, GS at 15 yr was 100% for those using an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and 44% for those not using an ACEI (p = 0.04). Among these recipients, HTN treated with no ACEI was a significant risk factor for graft failure at >5 yr (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5, p = 0.02), but HTN treated with an ACEI was not (HR = 0.6, p = 0.7). HTN at five yr post-KT is associated with poorer long-term GS in pediatric recipients, but ACEI therapy may enable better outcomes and should be studied further.

Prospective randomized trial of maintenance immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult kidney transplantation

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid-related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long-term (10-year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n=440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n=151); high-level tacrolimus (TAC, 8-12 μg/L) and low-level sirolimus (SIR, 3-7 μg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n=149) or low-level TAC (3-7 μg/L) and high-level SIR (8-12 μg/L) (TACL/SIR(H) , n=140). Median follow-up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10-year actuarial patient, graft and death-censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10-year actuarial rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p=0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p=0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post-KT complications. These data indicate that RDP-based protocol yield acceptable 10-year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.

Graft loss due to recurrent disease in pediatric kidney transplant recipients on a rapid prednisone discontinuation protocol

Recurrent disease is the fourth most common cause of graft loss (GL) in pediatric KTx recipients. We studied the incidence of recurrent disease and GL due to recurrent disease in pediatric KTx recipients on a RDP protocol. Between 2002 and 2010, we performed 74 KTxs in patients aged 5-18 yr using an RDP protocol, 25 (34%) were at risk of recurrence of primary disease. Outcomes were compared to 69 historical controls (18 [26%] at risk of recurrence), KTx between 1996 and 2000. Follow-up period was 39 ± 25 months in RDP and 124 ± 38 months in controls. The incidence of recurrent disease at three yr post-KTx was 16% in RDP and 28% in controls (p = NS). Mean time to recurrent disease was 22 ± 26 months in RDP and 46 ± 48 months in controls (p = 0.54). Nine (12%) grafts were lost in the RDP group (1-recurrence) and 32 (46%) in the control group (4-recurrence). Time to GL was 85 months in the RDP recipient and 46 ± 21 months in controls. An RDP protocol in pediatric KTx recipients may not be associated with increased risk of graft loss due to recurrent disease.

Ten-year outcome after rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult primary kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone after kidney transplantation potentially allows for minimization of steroid-related side effects. Although intermediate-term data with rapid discontinuation of prednisone have been promising, concern still exists regarding long-term outcomes. The 10-year experience is reported herein.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Between October 1, 1999 and December 31, 2010, 1241 adult primary kidney transplants (791 living donor and 450 deceased donor) were performed using a protocol in which prednisone is discontinued after postoperative day 5. The 10-year actuarial recipient and graft survival rates and prednisone-related side effects were studied.

RESULTS

Ten-year actuarial patient survival was 71% for living donor transplants and 62% for deceased donor transplants; 10-year graft survival was 61% for living donor transplants and 51% for deceased donor transplants, and was comparable to 10-year Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients national data. Ten-year death-censored graft survival was 79% for living donor transplants and 80% for deceased donor transplants. Ten-year acute rejection rates were 25% for deceased donor transplants and 31% for living donor transplants; 10-year chronic rejection (interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy) rates were 39% for deceased donor transplants and 47% for living donor transplants. For nondiabetic recipients of living donor or deceased donor allografts, the incidence of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower than in historical controls on prednisone (P<0.001). We also found significantly reduced rates of cataracts, avascular necrosis, and cytomegalovirus infection in some subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prednisone-related side effects can be minimized in a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression. Ten-year patient and graft outcomes remain acceptable.

Outcome of living kidney donors left with multiple renal arteries

Individuals with kidneys having ≥ 2 arteries appear to have an increased incidence of hypertension. Whether kidney donors in whom the remaining kidney has ≥ 2 arteries are at increased risk of hypertension is unknown. Therefore, we studied 3685 kidney donors to determine whether donors left with a kidney having ≥ 2 arteries were at increased risk of hypertension, impaired renal function, or death. Cohorts were assigned based on our practice pattern and the anatomy of the donated kidney. Of the 3685 donors, 1211 were estimated to have a remaining kidney with ≥ 2 arteries. Mean follow-up time for the single-artery group was 14.1 (± 11.0) yr and 15.3 (± 11.2) yr for the ≥ 2 artery group. Six-month hospital readmission rate was 1.4% and 1.2%, hypertension was noted in 22.4% and 21.8% and proteinuria in 9.7% and 9.6%, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up was 62 (± 28) and 62 (± 16) for single vs. ≥ 2 renal artery groups, respectively. Our data suggest no adverse clinical sequelae nor any decrease in long-term survival for donors left with a kidney having ≥ 2 renal arteries.

Selective retransplant after graft loss to nonadherence: success with a second chance

Nonadherence (NA) is a difficult posttransplant problem that can lead to graft loss. A retransplant is controversial because of a fear of recurrent NA. We reviewed our center's data base and identified 114 kidney recipients who lost their graft to overt NA; of this group, 35 (31%) underwent a retransplant after a thorough reevaluation. We compared this NA retransplant group to a control group of second transplant recipients who did not lose their first graft to overt NA (non-NA) (n = 552). After 8 years of follow-up, we found no significant differences between the groups in actuarial graft or patient survival rates, renal function, or the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection. However, 5 of 35 (14%) NA recipients versus 10 of 552 (2%) non-NA recipients lost their retransplant to NA (p = 0.0001). Twenty of 35 (57%) of the NA group exhibited repeat NA behavior after retransplant. We conclude that prior graft loss to NA is associated with increased graft loss to NA after retransplant. However, the majority of NA retransplant recipients did well-with overall long-term outcomes similar to those of the non-NA group. With careful patient selection and aggressive intervention, prior overt NA should not be an absolute contraindication to retransplantation.

2202 kidney transplant recipients with 10 years of graft function: what happens next?

The ultimate goal of clinical transplantation is for the recipients to achieve long-term survival, with continuing graft function, that is equivalent to that of the age-matched general population. We studied subsequent outcome in kidney transplant recipients with 10 years of graft function. In all, 2202 kidney transplant recipients survived with graft function >10 years. For 10-year survivors, the actuarial 25-year patient survival rate for primary transplant living donor (LD) recipients was 57%; graft survival, 43%. For primary transplant deceased donor (DD) recipients, the actuarial 25-year patient survival rate was 39%; graft survival, 27%. The two major causes of late graft loss were death (with graft function) and chronic allograft nephropathy (tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis). The two major causes of death with function were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and malignancy. For nondiabetic recipients, the mean age at death with function from CVD was 54 +/- 13 years; for diabetic recipients, 53 +/- 7 years. By 20 years posttransplant, morbidity was common: >40% recipients had skin cancer (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 13 years; for diabetics, 49 +/- 8 years), >10% had non-skin cancer (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 16 years; for diabetics, 46 +/- 9 years), and >30% had CVD (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 15 years; for diabetics, 47 +/- 9 years). We conclude that long-term transplant recipients have a high rate of morbidity and early mortality. As short-term results have improved, more focus is needed on long-term outcome.

Increased urologic complications in children after kidney transplants for obstructive and reflux uropathy

In the cyclosporine era, reports on pediatric kidney transplant (KTx) patients with obstructive and reflux uropathy are limited by small numbers, short follow-up, and/or lack of control groups. Our single-center study evaluated long-term outcomes (patient and graft survival, urinary tract infections [UTIs], urologic complications) in a large cohort of KTx recipients (<20 years old). We matched our 117 study patients with obstructive and reflux uropathy with 117 controls whose KTx was needed for other reasons; all 234 underwent their KTx between April 25, 1984, and October 23, 2002. The mean age was 8.0 +/- 6.2 years; mean follow-up, 133 +/- 67 months. The urologic complication rate was higher in study patients (43%) than in controls (11%) (p < 0.0001), as was the UTI rate (45% vs. 2%; p < 0.0001). The metabolic acidosis and UTI rates were higher in study patients who did (vs. did not) undergo bladder augmentation (p < 0.0001). We found no significant difference between study patients and controls in patient or graft survival, acute or chronic rejection, or mean estimated glomerular filtration rates. Unique to our study is the finding of higher metabolic acidosis and UTI rates in study patients who underwent bladder augmentation.

Stable Kidney Function in the Second Decade After Kidney Transplantation While on Cyclosporine-Based Immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols in kidney transplantation over the past 20 years. However, in some recipients, the adverse effects of CNIs contribute to chronic allograft nephropathy and death with function--the two leading causes of late graft loss. Other recipients maintain stable graft function.

METHODS

We studied the impact of continuing CNI-based immunosuppression in the second decade after kidney transplantation. From 1984 through 1996, a total of 1,263 patients underwent a primary kidney transplant at the University of Minnesota and received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Antibody induction was used only in deceased donor recipients.

RESULTS

The actuarial 20-year patient survival rate was 38%; graft survival, 30%; and death-censored graft survival, 60%. The annual mean serum creatinine level for recipients whose grafts survived > or =1 year remained stable, although recipients with a history of > or =1 acute rejection episode had a higher serum creatinine level vs. recipients who were rejection-free. The annual mean calculated creatinine clearance was also stable over time. In addition, for recipients who were acute rejection-free, chronic allograft nephropathy/chronic rejection was only responsible for 9% of graft losses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that some kidney transplant recipients tolerate long-term CNI-based immunosuppression with stable creatinine levels. Identifying certain recipients' predisposition to CNI toxicity and individualizing immunosuppressive therapy may be important in order to improve long-term kidney function, while simultaneously preserving low short-term acute rejection rates.

Risk factors for rising creatinine in renal allografts with 1 and 3 yr survival

BACKGROUND

Determining factors associated with negative slope of inverse creatinine vs. time (1/Cr vs. t) may help prevent a decline in renal allograft function.

METHODS

A total of 1389 adult recipients of primary renal transplants were divided into quartiles based on the slope of 1/Cr vs. t calculated from 6 and 12 months post transplant. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for being in the worst vs. best quartile employed these variables: donor source, HLA mismatch, recipient age, donor age, panel-reactive antibody (PRA), acute rejection (AR), 3-month cyclosporin A (CsA) level, 1-yr CsA level and acute tubular necrosis. Two separate analyses compared risk factors in patients with 1 and 3 yr survival, respectively.

RESULTS

In recipients with > or = 1 yr graft survival, high PRA and AR were associated with negative slopes of 1/Cr vs. t. For those with > or = 3 yr graft survival, both AR and 3-month CsA level > 150 ng/mL were significant risk factors, using both 6- and 12-month slopes. Stratification of AR showed 1 AR episode > or = 6 months and multiple AR episodes carried significant risk for negative slopes.

CONCLUSION

Optimization of allograft function invokes a conundrum between the needs to avoid both AR and high early CsA levels. We support a policy of carefully balancing these two risks.

Prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression-a 5-year experience

Concern persists that prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients will be associated with an increase in late allograft dysfunction and graft loss. We herein report 5-year follow-up of a trial of prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression. From October 1, 1999, through January 31, 2005, at our center, 589 kidney transplant recipients were treated with a protocol incorporating discontinuation of their prednisone on postoperative day 6. At 5 years, actuarial patient survival was 91%; graft survival, 84%; death-censored graft survival, 92%; acute rejection-free graft survival, 84% and chronic rejection-free graft survival, 87%. The mean serum creatinine level (+/-SD) at 1 year was 1.6 +/- 0.6; at 5 years, 1.7 +/- 0.8. In all, 86% of kidney recipients with functioning grafts remain prednisone-free as of April 30, 2005. As compared with historical controls, recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had a significantly lower rate of a number of complications, including cataracts (p < 0.001), posttransplant diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), avascular necrosis (p = 0.001), and fractures (p = 0.004). We conclude that prednisone-related side effects can be minimized in a protocol incorporating prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression. Five-year graft outcome remains good.

A prospective randomized trial of steroid-free maintenance regimens in kidney transplant recipients--an interim analysis

We compared three maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in a rapid discontinuation of prednisone protocol. From March 1, 2001, through December 31, 2003, 239 first and second kidney transplant recipients (166 LD; 73 DD) were randomized. All recipients were treated with Thymoglobulin; all received steroids intraoperatively and for 5 days postoperatively. Randomization was to cyclosporine-mycophenolate mofetil (n = 85); high-level tacrolimus (TAC) (8-12 ng/mL)-low-level sirolimus (SRL) (3-7 ng/mL) (n = 72); or low-level TAC (3-7 ng/mL)-high-level SRL (8-12 ng/mL) (n = 82). We found no difference at 24 months between groups in patient, graft, death-censored graft, or acute rejection-free graft survival, or in kidney function. Wound complications were more common in SRL-treated recipients (p = 0.02); we found no other differences between groups in complication rates. Our data suggest that excellent patient and graft survival and low rejection rates can be obtained using a variety of maintenance protocols without prednisone.

Thymoglobulin Versus ATGAM Induction Therapy in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Report

BACKGROUND

Induction immunosuppressive therapy with the anti-T-cell antibody Thymoglobulin decreases the incidence of acute rejection in adult kidney transplant (KTx) recipients, but limited data are available for pediatric KTx recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a historical cohort study to compare rates of survival, rejection, and infection in pediatric (age <19 years) KTx recipients who received induction therapy with polyclonal antibody, ATGAM (n=127) or Thymoglobulin (n=71), from December 1, 1992, to January 31, 2003. Maintenance immunosuppression included cyclosporine, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Mean follow-up was 90+/-25 months for ATGAM recipients and 32+/-15 months for Thymoglobulin recipients.

RESULTS

Overall, the incidence of acute rejection was lower in Thymoglobulin recipients versus ATGAM recipients (33% vs. 50%, P=0.02). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection was higher in Thymoglobulin recipients versus ATGAM recipients (8% vs. 3%, P=0.002). But the two groups did not significantly differ in patient and graft survival rates, incidence of chronic rejection, EBV lymphoma, or other infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, Thymoglobulin induction was associated with a decreased incidence of acute rejection and an increased incidence of EBV infection in pediatric KTx recipients. EBV monitoring should be performed in EBV-naive recipients receiving Thymoglobulin.

Mycobacterial Infections After Kidney Transplant

We looked at mycobacterial infections occurring after a kidney transplant to determine incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Of 3921 kidney transplants performed between 1984 and 2002, 18 (0.45%) (10 men, eight women; 11 cadaveric donor, seven living donor graft) were identified as having mycobacterial infection at some time posttransplant. Mean age at transplant was 38.3 years. Racial background was: Caucasian (n = 12), African-American (n = 2), Native Indian (n = 2), Hispanic (n = 1), and Middle Eastern (n = 1). The majority had a kidney alone (n = 14). Four recipients had simultaneous transplant of a second organ: pancreas (n = 2), islets (n = 1), and liver (n = 1). None of the 18 recipients had documented mycobacterial infection pretransplant. One recipient had a positive Mantoux test at the time of transplant and then developed pulmonary tuberculosis 4 months posttransplant; the remaining 17 patients had either negative (n = 10) or unavailable (n = 7) pretransplant Mantoux results. Mean time to infection was 3.2 years (range 1 week to 12 years). The most common site of infection was respiratory (n = 8). Other sites included musculoskeletal (n = 4), skin (n = 3), gyn (n = 1), and other (n = 2). Only three of the infections were with mycobacterial tuberculi; the others were with avium (n = 5), chelonae (n = 2), or other nontuberculous mycobacteria. Risk factors included previous TB exposure, occupational exposure, or accidental soft tissue injury. Soft tissue infections often presented as chronic unhealed wounds and required extensive surgical debridements. With mean follow-up of 12.5 years since transplant and 9.2 years since infection, 13 of the recipients are alive and well; causes of death included cardiovascular (n = 3) and sepsis (n = 2).

Urolithiasis after kidney transplantation in pediatric recipients: a single center report

BACKGROUND

Urolithiasis occurs in approximately 6% of adult kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. Limited data are available on urolithiasis after pediatric KTx. We report the incidence, management of, and risk factors for stone development in children after KTx.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 399 children who received KTx at our center between September 1986 and January 2003. Transplant outcomes were compared in stone formers and controls.

RESULTS

Twenty (5%) patients, age 9+/-5 (X +/- SD) years, developed stones over the follow-up period (74+/-53 months). Time to stone presentation was 19+/-22 months post-KTx. Presenting features were urinary tract infection (UTI), 8; gross hematuria, 5; microscopic hematuria, 2; dysuria without infection, 6; difficulty voiding, 3; and silent stones, 2. Stones were removed by cystoscopy in 11 (55%) patients. Stone composition was determined in 11 patients: calcium phosphate (55%), calcium oxalate (18%), mixed calcium phosphate and oxalate (9%), and struvite (18%). Factors predisposing to stones in study patients included suture retention (n = 4), elevated urinary calcium excretion (n = 2), recurrent UTI (n = 2), and urinary stasis (n = 2). The incidence of UTI was higher (P = 0.003) and of acute rejection was lower (P = 0.02) in stone patients compared with controls. Patient and graft survival rates and the incidence of chronic rejection did not significantly differ between study patients and controls (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Urolithiasis is not uncommon in pediatric KTx patients. Factors associated with post-KTx urolithiasis include retention of suture material, recurrent UTI, hypercalciuria, and urinary stasis. Treatment is associated with excellent outcome and low recurrence rate.

Rapid Discontinuation of Prednisone in Higher-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

Prednisone-minimization protocols have been successful in low-risk recipients. We report on the use of a protocol incorporating rapid discontinuation of prednisone in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 79) at increased immunologic risk. Our data suggests that such recipients should not be excluded from prednisone-minimization protocols.

Long-term immunosuppression, without maintenance prednisone, after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Concern exists that prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients will increase acute and/or chronic rejection.

METHODS

From October 1, 1999, through February 29, 2004, at our center, 477 kidney transplant recipients (341 living donor, 136 cadaver) discontinued prednisone on postoperative day 6, per our protocol. Immunosuppression consisted of polyclonal antibody (Thymoglobulin) for 5 days, prednisone intraoperatively and for 5 days, a calcineurin inhibitor, and either sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil. We compared outcome with that of historical controls who did not discontinue prednisone.

RESULTS

The recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had excellent 4-year actuarial patient survival (92%), graft survival (90%), acute rejection-free graft survival (86%), and chronic rejection-free graft survival (95%). The mean serum creatinine level (+/- SD) at 1 year was 1.6 +/- 0.6; at 4 years, 1.6 +/- 0.6. We noted that 8% of recipients had cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease; 4.5%, fractures; 2.8%, cataracts; 1%, posttransplant diabetes; 0.2%, avascular necrosis; 0.2%, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease; and 0%, polyomavirus. In all, 85% of kidney recipients with functioning grafts remain prednisone-free as of April 1, 2004. As compared with historical controls, the recipients on prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppression had better patient (P = 0.02) and graft survival (P < 0.0001) and lower rates of acute (P = 0.0004) and chronic (P = 0.02) rejection. In addition, they had a significantly lower rate of CMV disease (P < 0.0001), cataracts (P < 0.0001), posttransplant diabetes (P < 0.0001), and avascular necrosis (P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Prednisone-related side effects can be minimized without maintenance immunosuppression; our prednisone-free recipients do not have increased acute or chronic rejection.

Hyperlipidemia in pediatric kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine

Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in adult kidney transplant (Tx) recipients. We sought to determine the prevalence of, and the risk factors associated with, hyperlipidemia in pediatric kidney Tx recipients on cyclosporine (CsA). We identified 59 patients (mean age 8.2+/-5.7 years) transplanted between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 1993. Pre Tx, 34% had elevated total cholesterol [TC >200 mg/dl (5.17 mmol/l)]; 54% had elevated triglycerides [TG >200 mg/dl (2.26 mmol/L)]. Mean TG was higher pre Tx in dialysis (versus nondialysis) patients: 306 mg/dl (3.46 mmol/l) versus 228 mg/dl (2.58 mmol/l) ( P=0.04). Mean TC was higher in peritoneal dialysis than hemodialysis patients: 222 mg/dl (5.74 mmol/l) versus 169 mg/dl (4.37 mmol/l) ( P=0.03). Pre Tx and 3-year values correlated (TC, r=0.49, P=0.0008; TG, r=0.41, P=0.001); 3- and 5-year TC values correlated ( r=0.57, P=0.003). At 5 years post Tx, 41% of the recipients had elevated TC; 14% had elevated TG. Recipients with elevated TC had higher mean CsA concentrations at 1 year post Tx ( P=0.03). Recipients with elevated TG tended to receive more prednisone ( P=0.06). At 5 years post Tx, recipients had a high prevalence of hyperlipidemia. The identification and treatment of hyperlipidemia should be included in pediatric kidney Tx protocols.

Positive remote crossmatch: impact on short-term and long-term outcome in cadaver renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

A positive crossmatch with a "current" recipient serum (drawn shortly before the proposed transplant) is a contraindication to renal transplantation because of the risk of hyperacute rejection. Conflicting data have been reported concerning the significance of a positive crossmatch with "remote" sera (obtained months or years earlier) when the current crossmatch is negative.

METHODS

Recipients of a first or second cadaver transplant between June 1988 and April 1994 were studied. All transplants were performed with a negative "current" crossmatch. Retrospective crossmatches using "remote" sera were performed for all sensitized recipients.

RESULTS

Recipients with a positive remote crossmatch (RXM) demonstrated a higher incidence of delayed graft function and of acute rejection and graft loss occurring in the first year posttransplant than did sensitized recipients with a negative RXM or unsensitized recipients. In multivariate analysis, only recipients with both a positive RXM and delayed graft function were at significantly higher risk for graft loss. Grafts surviving the first year demonstrated similar half-lives whether the RXM was positive or negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive RXM, possibly in conjunction with other factors leading to very early graft damage, is a significant predictor of unfavorable transplant outcome in first and second renal transplants. This effect is seen early in the transplant course, and there seems to be no impact on outcome after the first year. Newer immunosuppressive modalities may help to reduce the early negative impact.

Five preventable causes of kidney graft loss in the 1990s: a single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in immunosuppressive protocols and patient care, kidney allografts continue to fail. We studied causes of graft loss for primary kidney transplants in the 1990s to determine major causes and potential interventions.

METHODS

Causes of graft loss were reviewed for 1467 primary kidney transplants done at our institution between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1999. Graft loss for that entire population was studied and then the causes of loss selectively examined at <1 year, 1 to 5 years, and>5 years post-transplant. Finally, causes of loss in the 1990s versus the 1980s were compared.

RESULTS

Five major causes of graft loss were noted in the 1990s: thrombosis, acute rejection (either alone or combined with delayed graft function or infection), chronic rejection, death with function, and noncompliance. In the first year post-transplant, thrombosis (25%) and death with function (41%) were the major causes of graft loss. After the first year, chronic rejection and death with function predominated. For recipients dying with graft function, cardiovascular disease was the major cause of death.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the five major causes of kidney graft loss in the 1990s. Different interventions are required to decrease loss from each of these causes. Future research needs to be directed at such interventions.

Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?

BACKGROUND

The most common surgical complication after a kidney transplant is likely related to the wound. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, wound complications (e.g., infections, hernias) in kidney recipients and to assess whether newer immunosuppressive drugs increase the risk for such complications.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1984 and September 30, 1998, we performed 2013 adult kidney transplants. Of these 2013 recipients, 97 (4.8%) developed either a superficial or a deep wound infection. Additionally, 73 (3.6%) recipients developed either a fascial dehiscence or a hernia of the wound. We used univariate and multivariate techniques to determine significant risk factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean time to development of a superficial infection (defined as located above the fascia) was 11.9 days posttransplant; to development of a deep infection (defined as located below the fascia), 39.2 days; and to development of a hernia or fascial dehiscence, 12.8 months. By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for a superficial or deep wound infection was obesity (defined as body mass index>30 kg/m2) (RR=4.4, P=0.0001). Other significant risk factors were a urine leak posttransplant, any reoperation through the transplant incision, diabetes, and the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=2.43, P=0.0001). Significant risk factors for a hernia or fascial dehiscence were any reoperation through the transplant incision, increased recipient age, obesity, and the use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=3.54, P=0.0004). Use of antibody induction and treatment for acute rejection were not significant risk factors for either infections or hernias. Death-censored graft survival was lower in recipients who developed a wound infection (vs. those who did not); it was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who did not).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite immunosuppression including chronic steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kidney recipients. As with other types of surgery, the main risk factors for postoperative complications are obesity, reoperation, and increased age. However, in kidney recipients, use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) is an additional risk factor -one that potentially could be altered, especially in high-risk recipients.

5,000 kidney transplants--a single-center experience

Between 6/1963 and 12/1998, 5,069 kidney transplants were done at the University of Minnesota. Of these, about half have been living donor, half cadaver. The majority (83%) have been primary transplants. Recipients were grouped in 6 eras based on changes in our immunosuppressive protocols--6/63-12/67 (n = 98); 1/68-7/79 (n = 1,188); 8/79-6/84 (n = 789); 7/84-9/90 (n = 1,006); 10/90-12/95 (n = 1,050; 1/96-12/98 (n = 718)--and their outcomes were compared. Recent eras contained a higher proportion of recipients aged > 50. Since the inception of the program, there has been a steady improvement in actuarial patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival. Short-term outcome for primary and retransplant recipients has been similar; however, long-term outcome seems worse for retransplant recipients. Importantly, acute rejection and infectious death have become rare causes of graft loss. Chronic rejection and death with function (most often due to a cardiovascular event) have become the predominant causes of graft loss. Recent changes in immunosuppressive protocols (Era VI) have included more aggressive attempts to maintain CsA levels > 150 ng/ml (by HPLC) in the first 3 months and the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine. As a result, the incidence of acute and chronic rejection has decreased and graft survival has improved.

Rapid discontinuation of steroids in living donor kidney transplantation: a pilot study

Steroids are associated with significant postoperative complications (hypertension, cosmetic changes, bone loss, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and cataracts). Most develop early; in addition, late post-transplant steroid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients has been associated with increased acute rejection (AR). To obviate these problems, we studied outcome of a protocol of rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDS) (steroids stopped on POD6). Between November 1, 1999 and October 31, 2000, 51 adult living donor (LD) first transplant recipients (2 HLA-id, 28 non-id relative, 21 LURD) were immunosuppressed with thymoglobulin (1.25 mg/kg intraoperatively and then qdx4); prednisone (P) (500 mg methylprednisolone intraoperatively, 1 mg/kg x 1 day, 0.5 mg/kg x 2 days, 0.25 mg/kg x 2 days, then d/c); MMF, 1 g b.i.d.; and CSA, 4 mg/kg b.i.d. adjusted to achieve levels of 150-200 ng/mL (by HPLC). Exclusion criteria were delayed graft function or primary disease requiring P. Minimum follow-up was 5.5 months (range 5.5 to 17.5 months). Outcome was compared vs. previous cohorts of LD recipients immunosuppressed with P/AZA/CSA (n = 171) or P/MMF/CSA (n = 43) (both without antibody induction).

RESULTS

For the RDS group, average CSA level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months was 190 +/- 12 and 180 +/- 9; avg. MMF dose, 1.7 +/- 0.1 g and 1.7 +/- 0.1 g. There was no significant difference in 6- and 12-month actuarial patient survival, graft survival and rejection-free graft survival between recipients on the RDS protocol vs. historical controls. For RDS recipients, actuarial 6- and 12-month rejection-free graft survival was 87%. Of the 51 RDS recipients, five (10%) have had AR (at 20 days, 1 month, 3 months, 3 months, and 3.5 months post-transplant). After treatment, all five were maintained on 5 mg P; there have been no second AR episodes. Two additional recipients were started on 5 mg P due to low white blood count (WBC) and low/no MMF. Of the 51 grafts, one has failed (death with function). Average serum Cr level (+/- S.E.) at 3 and 6 months for RDS recipients was 1.7 +/- 0.5 (NS vs. historical controls).

CONCLUSION

For low-risk LD recipients, a kidney transplant with an RDS protocol does not increase risk of AR or graft loss. Future studies will need to be done to assess AR rates with an RDS protocol in cadaver transplant recipients and in recipients with delayed graft function.

2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To review a single center's experience and outcome with living donor transplants.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Outcome after living donor transplants is better than after cadaver donor transplants. Since the inception of the authors' program, they have performed 2,540 living donor transplants. For the most recent cohort of recipients, improvements in patient care and immunosuppressive protocols have improved outcome. In this review, the authors analyzed outcome in relation to protocol.

METHODS

The authors studied patient and graft survival by decade. For those transplanted in the 1990s, the impact of immunosuppressive protocol, donor source, diabetes, and preemptive transplantation was analyzed. The incidence of rejection, posttransplant steroid-related complications, and return to work was determined. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to study risk factors for worse 1-year graft survival and, for those with graft function at 1 year, to study risk factors for worse long-term survival.

RESULTS

For each decade since 1960, outcome has improved after living donor transplants. Compared with patients transplanted in the 1960s, those transplanted in the 1990s have better 8-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates. Death with function and chronic rejection have continued to be a major cause of graft loss, whereas acute rejection has become a rare cause of graft loss. Cardiovascular deaths have become a more predominant cause of patient death; infection has decreased. Donor source (e.g., ideally HLA-identical sibling) continues to be important. For living donor transplants, rejection and graft survival rates are related to donor source. The authors show that patients who had preemptive transplants or less than 1 year of dialysis have better 5-year graft survival and more frequently return to full-time employment. Readmission and complications remain problems; of patients transplanted in the 1990s, only 36% never required readmission. Similarly, steroid-related complications remain common. The authors' multivariate analysis shows that the major risk factor for worse 1-year graft survival was delayed graft function. For recipients with 1-year graft survival, risk factors for worse long-term outcome were pretransplant smoking, pretransplant peripheral vascular disease, pretransplant dialysis for more than 1 year, one or more acute rejection episodes, and donor age older than 55.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the outcome of living donor transplants has continued to improve. However, for living donors, donor source affects outcome. The authors also identify other major risk factors affecting both short- and long-term outcome.

Peri-operative cardiac morbidity in kidney transplant recipients: incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Renal transplant recipients are known to be at increased risk for developing cardiac disease. In both general and peripheral vascular surgery, pre-operative risk stratification (and intervention when indicated) has decreased the incidence of peri-operative cardiac complications. In this study, we set out to identify subsets of patients at high risk for peri-operative cardiac complications after a renal transplant.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2694 adult renal transplants performed at the University of Minnesota between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1998. We determined the incidence of peri-operative (within 30 d post-transplant) cardiac complications, including myocardial infarction (MI). Risk factors for the development of these complications were determined by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

We found 163 peri-operative cardiac complications, for an overall incidence of 6.1%. Specific cardiac complications included MI (n=43, 1.6%), arrhythmia (n=74, 2.7%), angina (n=31, 1.2%), cardiac arrest (n=13, 0.5%), and congestive heart failure (n= 2, 0.1%). By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for any cardiac complication were age> or =50 yr (relative risk (RR)=3.0, p=0.0001) and pre-transplant cardiac disease (RR=3.3, p=0.0001). Not significant were diabetes mellitus (DM), cadaver donor source, pre-transplant dialysis, a history of smoking, and hypertension. Significant risk factors for peri-operative MI were age> or =50 yr, pre-existing cardiac disease, and DM. Diabetic patients with pre-existing cardiac disease were at especially high risk for peri-operative cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients>50 yr and those with pre-existing cardiac disease, especially if diabetic, are at significantly increased risk for developing peri-operative cardiac complications after a renal transplant. Such patients require aggressive pre-operative investigations, which may include coronary angiography, to decrease the risk of post-transplant complications.

Pre-emptive transplants for patients with renal failure: an argument against waiting until dialysis

BACKGROUND

Pre-emptive kidney transplants have not been favored in some centers because of concern about possible increased noncompliance and allegedly inferior long-term results. We analyzed our experience with pre-emptive kidney transplants to determine whether such concerns are justified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 1984, and June 30, 1998, we performed 1849 adult primary kidney transplants: 385 pre-emptive (recipients not undergoing dialysis, ND) and 1464 non-pre-emptive (recipients undergoing dialysis, D). Results were subdivided by donor source: cadaver (CAD) and living donor (LD). ND recipients tended to be younger, but otherwise, the two groups were similar. Posttransplantation quality of life in recipients was evaluated using the nationally standardized Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The posttransplantation employment status of the recipients was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The patient survival rate 5 years posttransplantation was significantly better for ND (vs. D) recipients for both CAD (92.6% vs. 76.6%, P=0.001) and LD (93.3% vs. 89.5%, P=0.02) transplants. The 5-year patient survival rate was significantly higher for ND recipients compared with recipients undergoing dialysis for < 1, 1-2, and > 2 years pretransplantation for both CAD (P=0.0005) and LD (P=0.0001) transplants. The graft survival rate 5 years posttransplantation was similar between ND and D recipients for CAD transplants, but significantly better for ND (vs. D) recipients of LD transplants (92.3% vs. 84.8%, P=0.006). For CAD transplants, the 5-year graft survival rate was not different when ND recipients were compared with recipients undergoing dialysis for < 1, 1-2, and > 2 years pretransplantation; for LD transplants it was significantly higher for ND recipients compared with recipients undergoing dialysis for < 1, 1-2, and > 2 years pretransplantation (P=0.04). The incidence of acute and chronic rejection was no different between ND and D recipients for either CAD or LD transplants, and it was also not affected by the pretransplantation time undergoing dialysis. Graft loss secondary to the recipient's discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy (a crude estimate of compliance) was similar between ND and D recipients. Five years posttransplantation, the SF-36 scores regarding the recipient's quality of life and the employment status were similar for ND compared with D recipients, regardless of donor source.

CONCLUSIONS

ND recipients do not seem to have higher rates of noncompliance than D recipients. Results for ND recipients seem to be superior than for D recipients, supporting the contention that renal failure patients should, if possible, undergo transplantation before dialysis.

Renal transplantation for type II diabetic patients compared with type I diabetic patients and patients over 50 years old: a single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Transplantation of renal allografts for Type II diabetic patients has become increasingly common. Like Type I diabetics and patients over age 50, Type II diabetics are in a high-risk category for renal transplantation. Some investigators argue that the scarce resources of the valuable donor pool should not be allocated to these high-risk, older individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who often have significant comorbidity. We studied the outcome of renal transplantation for 90 Type II diabetics and compared it with the outcome for Type I diabetics and patients over age 50 with other primary diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of data on all renal transplants performed at the University of Minnesota since September 1984 for Type II diabetics. We analyzed both patient and graft survival rates and compared them with the outcome for Type I diabetics and separately for all nondiabetics over age 50. We grouped recipients by donor source (living vs. cadaver) and age at transplant (< 50 vs. > 50). We studied reasons for graft loss, patient death, pre-operative morbidity, and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

We found that recipient age and donor source did not affect outcome. Overall 5-yr patient survival for Type II diabetics was 61%; graft survival, 53%. Type II diabetics had significantly worse patient and graft survival than Type I diabetics and than nondiabetics over age 50. However, death-censored graft survival was not different between these groups, suggesting little difference in immunologic graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal transplantation is a relatively safe, viable option for Type II diabetics with ESRD and significant comorbidity. Although their overall graft survival is less than for Type I diabetics and for nondiabetics over age 50, the immunologic graft failure rate is the same in all three groups.

Immunologic and nonimmunologic factors: different risks for cadaver and living donor transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is a debate about the relative contribution of immunologic (rejection) and nonimmunologic (limited nephron mass) factors in long-term graft survival.

METHODS

Using multivariate analysis, we studied the association of the following variables with outcome: delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, recipient race (black vs. nonblack), donor age (<50 vs. > or =50), donor race, and donor and recipient gender. Because of the association between DGF and rejection, recipients were grouped as follows: DGF, rejection; DGF, no rejection; no DGF, rejection; no DGF, no rejection. Data were analyzed on 1199 first kidney transplants in adults (752 living donor, 447 cadaver donor) done between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1996. Two analyses were done: first, all transplants; second, only those with > or =1 year survival. For both, there was no difference in risk factors if death with function was or was not censored.

RESULTS

For all cadaver transplant recipients, risk factors were acute rejection, DGF plus rejection, black recipient race, and donor age > or =50. For living donor recipients, only acute rejection was a risk factor. When only 1-year graft survivors were considered, risk factors were the same: for cadaver recipients, risk factors were acute rejection, DGF plus rejection, black recipient race, and donor age > or =50; for living donor recipients the risk factor was rejection.

CONCLUSION

We found immunologic factors (rejection with or without DGF) to be significant in both living donor and cadaver donor transplants. Nonim. munologic factors (donor age, recipient race) were significant only in cadaver donor transplants.

Association between cytomegalovirus disease and chronic rejection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

It has long been suggested that cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease plays a role in the pathogenesis of chronic rejection (CR). However, its role has been difficult to prove, given the strong association between acute rejection and CMV, and the even stronger association between acute rejection and CR. To try to isolate the relative contribution of CMV infection in the pathogenesis of CR, we used multivariate techniques to examine risk factors for CR, including CMV disease.

METHODS

Our study population consisted of adult recipients of a first kidney graft who underwent transplantation at a single center between 1/1/85 and 6/30/97 (n = 1339).

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis using time to CR as the dependent variable demonstrated acute rejection to be the strongest risk factor (relative risk [RR] = 17.8, P = 0.0001), followed by older donor age (RR = 1.46, P = 0.01). The presence of CMV disease showed a trend toward increased risk for CR (RR = 1.30, P = 0.10), although the association was not as strong as with the other two variables. Comparing only those recipients with acute rejection and CMV disease versus those with acute rejection but no CMV disease, the relative risk of developing CR was 1.37 times higher in the former group. Recipients with acute rejection and CMV developed CR sooner and with a higher incidence versus those with acute rejection but no CMV (P = 0.002). It is interesting, however, that CMV disease was only a risk factor for CR in the presence of acute rejection. Recipients with no acute rejection and CMV disease did not have a higher incidence of CR versus those with no acute rejection and no CMV (P = NS).

CONCLUSION

CMV disease seems to play some role in the pathogenesis of CR but only in the presence of acute rejection. Reasons may include (i) the inability to adequately treat acute rejection due to the presence of CMV disease or (ii) the increased virulence of latent CMV virus in recipients being treated for acute rejection. Our data may suggest a role for more aggressive prophylaxis against CMV disease, especially at the time of treatment for acute rejection.

Features of acute rejection that increase risk for chronic rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (AR) has been shown to be a significant risk factor for chronic rejection (CR) in kidney transplant recipients, yet many recipients with AR do not progress to CR. The purpose of this study was to determine if certain AR episodes are associated with a worse prognosis.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 279 kidney transplant recipients, all treated for a single episode of biopsy-proven AR. All AR episodes were initially treated with steroids; steroid-resistant rejection was managed with an antibody preparation.

RESULTS

First, by univariate techniques, we determined the clinical impact of severity of AR (as estimated by delta creatinine [dCr], defined as the change in baseline serum creatinine level 6 weeks after AR treatment) on two different endpoints--biopsy-proven CR and graft survival. Irrespective of 6-week dCr, all recipients with AR had a significantly increased risk of CR vs. those with no AR (P<0.01). Recipients with dCr between 0.5 and 1.0 mg/dl had a significantly higher incidence of CR vs. those with dCr <0.5 mg/dl (P<0.05), but a significantly lower incidence vs. those with dCr >1.0 mg/dl (P<0.05). We then performed multivariate analysis. We used severity of AR in addition to other variables (e.g., timing of AR, donor age) to determine which factors were most associated with risk for CR and graft loss. Risk for CR increased with AR episodes occurring >6 months after transplant (relative risk [RR] = 3.8, P = 0.005); with moderate or severe (vs. mild) AR episodes (RR = 2.7, P = 0.05); and with dCr >0.5 mg(dl (vs. <0.5 mg/dl) at 6 weeks after AR treatment (RR = 2.3, P = 0.1). Findings were similar when graft survival (death-censored) was the endpoint instead of CR.

CONCLUSIONS

All AR episodes are associated with some increase in the risk for CR. But AR episodes occurring >6 months after transplant and those of increased severity (as assessed qualitatively by histologic grading and quantitatively by dCr) confer the greatest risk. Recipients with these risk factors could be targeted with measures to decrease their risk for CR, including trials of novel immunosuppressive regimens.

Decreased acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients is associated with decreased chronic rejection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a recent decrease in the rate of acute rejection after kidney transplantation was associated with a decrease in the rate of chronic rejection.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Single-institution and multicenter retrospective analyses have identified acute rejection episodes as the major risk factor for chronic rejection after kidney transplantation. However, to date, no study has shown that a decrease in the rate of acute rejection leads to a decrease in the rate of chronic rejection.

METHODS

The authors studied patient populations who underwent transplants at a single center during two eras (1984-1987 and 1991-1994) to determine the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection, the rate of biopsy-proven chronic rejection, and the graft half-life.

RESULTS

Recipients who underwent transplantation in era 2 had a decreased rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection compared with era 1 (p < 0.05). This decrease was associated with a decreased rate of biopsy-proven chronic rejection for both cadaver (p = 0.0001) and living donor (p = 0.08) recipients. A trend was observed toward increased graft half-life in era 2 (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Development of immunosuppressive protocols that decrease the rate of acute rejection should lower the rate of chronic rejection and improve long-term graft survival.

Living donors >55 years: to use or not to use?

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplants using older donors are becoming increasingly accepted as a strategy for alleviating the growing donor organ shortage. Most studies to date have shown decreased graft survival associated with the use of older cadaver donors; however, studies on the effect of living donor age on graft survival are less clear-cut.

METHODS

We studied the effect of donor age on patient and graft survival after 1126 consecutive cyclosporine-treated primary kidney transplants performed between January 1, 1985 and December 31, 1995. Of these grafts, 598 were from living donors (74 from donors >55 years old) and 528 from cadaver donors (54 from donors >55 years). We calculated actuarial patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival for recipients of both living donor and cadaver kidneys. Living donors were then further divided by HLA mismatch (0 vs. 1 - 6) and the presence or absence of an acute rejection episode. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with decreased graft survival was performed for recipients of both living and cadaver donor kidneys. Factors included for analysis were donor age >55 years, recipient age >50 years, the presence of diabetes mellitus, HLA mismatch (0 vs. 1 - 6), and the presence of an acute rejection episode.

RESULTS

For cadaver kidneys, univariate analysis indicates that both overall (P=0.004) and death-censored (P=0.001) graft survival was significantly better with younger cadaver kidneys. This is supported by our multivariate analysis, which shows that cadaver donor age >55 years is an independent predictor of poor actuarial graft survival (P=0.0003). For living donor kidneys, univariate analysis also indicates that both overall (P=0.045) and death-censored (P=0.005) graft survival was significantly better with younger living donor kidneys. However, in the absence of acute rejection, 10-year death-censored graft survival for patients with older vs. younger living donor kidneys was 93% vs. 94%, whereas in the presence of one or more acute rejection episodes, 10-year death-censored graft survival dropped markedly to 39% with older and 54% with younger living donors. Kidneys from living donors >55 years had significantly better long-term graft survival than cadaver donors >55 years (P=0.012) and had comparable graft survival to younger cadaver donors. In contrast to our univariate analysis, multivariate analysis of our living donor data shows that decreased actuarial living donor death-censored graft survival was significantly associated only with the presence of one or more acute rejection episodes (P<0.0001). Living donor age >55 years was not independently associated with decreased graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Ours is the largest single-center study of outcome for recipients of kidneys from living donors >55 years. Using univariate analysis, we have shown that graft survival of kidneys from older living donors is significantly better than that of kidneys from older cadaver donors and is comparable to that of kidneys from younger cadaver donors. Using multivariate analysis, we have shown that the presence of one or more acute rejection episodes significantly shortens both cadaver and living donor long-term graft survival. Most significantly, we have shown that, although the use of kidneys from cadaver donors >55 years is associated with significantly decreased long-term graft survival, no such association exists for recipients of kidneys from living donors >55 years. We feel that our data support the continued use of kidneys from older living donors.

Venous thromboembolic complications after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation: a multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications in our population of kidney (KTx) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients.

METHODS

Information was collected retrospectively from a database on 1833 KTx and 276 SPK recipients who underwent transplant surgery between January 1985 and August 1995.

RESULTS

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was 6.2% (n= 132), with significantly higher rates after SPK (18.1%) vs. KTx (4.5%) (P < 0.001). The number of DVT episodes was highest in the first month; 17.5% occurred during this time. For KTx recipients, early thrombotic events were more common on the side of the graft (P=0.03); however, after 1 month, no correlation existed between the side of the graft and the side of DVT. For SPK recipients, DVT tended to be more common on the side of the pancreas (57%) vs. the kidney (43%) (P=0.10). By multivariate analysis, risk factors for DVT were: age > 40 years (odds ratio [OR]=2.2, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR=2.0, P=0.002), previous DVT (OR=4.4, P=0.001), and SPK transplant (OR=2.8, P < 0.001). Pulmonary embolus (PE) was identified in 44 recipients (incidence, 2.1%) and was fatal in 13 (30%). The incidence was significantly higher in SPK (4.71%) vs. KTx recipients (1.69%) (P < 0.01). The risk of death from PE was 0.5% in KTx recipients and 1.37% in SPK recipients (P=0.08). Risk factors for PE included DM (OR=2.6, P=0.005) and recent DVT (OR=8.9, P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on risk and extrapolating from the general surgical literature, our recommendations for prophylaxis against DVT are use of graduated compression stockings for all recipients and, in addition, low-dose heparin for moderate and high-risk recipients (previous DVT, SPK, age > 40 years, DM).

Effect of early cyclosporine levels on kidney allograft rejection

Acute rejection is the greatest risk factor for development of biopsy-proven chronic rejection and late kidney allograft loss. We previously noted that low cyclosporine (CsA) levels were a risk factor for early acute rejection in pediatric recipients (1). In our current study, we used logistic regression to identify risk factors for acute rejection in 726 adult kidney transplant recipients on triple therapy (prednisone, azathioprine, CsA). Variables considered for logistic regression analysis were donor organ source (cadaver vs. living), degree of HLA mismatch (1 to 6 vs. 0 antigen mismatch), transplant number (primary vs. retransplant), CsA levels (< 125 vs. > or = 125 ng/ml, < 150 ng/ml vs. > or = 150 ng/ml, and < 175 vs. > or = 175 ng/ml), and acute rejection episodes (0 vs. > or = 1). Of 726 recipients, 401 (55%) received cadaver kidneys; 325 (45%), living related. Overall, 572 (79%) had a primary transplant; 154 (21%), a retransplant. The vast majority of acute rejection episodes occurred within the first 2 months posttransplant; 68% of recipients had no acute rejection episodes by 2 months and 58% had none by 60 months posttransplant. Logistic regression analysis revealed that a cadaver donor kidney (vs. living) (p = 0.004), a 1 to 6 antigen mismatch (vs. 0 mismatch) (p = 0.001), and CsA levels < 150 ng/ml (vs. > or = 150 ng/ml) correlated with biopsy-proven acute rejection. The correlation for CsA levels < 150 ng/ml (vs. > or = 150 ng/ml) held true for levels at 1 wk (p < 0.05), 1 month (p = 0.0001), 2 months (p = 0.01), and 3 months (p = 0.02) posttransplant. Similar correlation was found for CsA levels < 125 ng/ml (vs. > or = 125 ng/ml) and < 175 ng/ml (vs. > or = 175 ng/ml). Comparative analyses were made (by Chi-square) of acute and chronic rejection rates when recipients were divided into 3 groups by CsA level (< 125 ng/ml, > or = 125 to < 150 ng/ml, and > or 150 ng/ml). At each time point (1 wk, 2 wk, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months), CsA levels < 125 ng/ml (vs. > or = 125 to < 150 ng/ml and > or = 150 ng/ml) were associated with the greatest increased risk of acute rejection--for both cadaver and living related recipients (all p < 0.05). CsA levels < 125 ng/ml at each time point (1 wk, 2 wk, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months) were also associated with a significantly increased risk of chronic rejection (all p < 0.001). The incidence of both acute and chronic rejection was reduced in the group with CsA levels > or = 125 to < 150 ng/ml and further reduced in the > or = 150 ng/ml group. Our data indicate that maintaining CsA levels > or = 150 ng/ml as part of triple therapy reduces the incidence of both acute and chronic rejection. Because chronic rejection is the leading cause of late allograft loss, maintaining adequate CsA levels should improve long-term graft survival. Based on this analysis, we have modified our own immunosuppressive regimens to achieve higher CsA levels earlier posttransplant.

Effect of initial slow graft function on renal allograft rejection and survival

Cadaver renal allografts with immediate excellent function have good long-term outcomes, while grafts with delayed function have been associated with an increased incidence of acute rejection (AR) and subsequent poor long-term graft survival. There is, however, an intermediate group with initial slow function whose outcome is not well defined. This group was examined by reviewing 510 patients that received primary cadaver transplants between 1/85 and 8/95. Recipients were grouped by initial function into: 1) those with immediate graft function (IGF), defined by serum creatinine (Cr) level < 3 mg/dl on post-operative day (POD) 5 (n = 237); 2) those with slow graft function (SGF), defined by serum Cr > 3 mg/dl on POD 5 but no need for dialysis (n = 160); and 3) those with delayed graft function (DGF), defined by the need for dialysis in the first week post-transplant (n = 113). Five-year graft survivals were determined for each group by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by a generalized Wilcoxon test. The incidence of AR in the first 6 months was significantly higher in those with SGF (40%) vs. those with IGF (30%) (p < 0.05); both groups had a lower incidence than those with DGF (47%) (p < 0.05). In the absence of AR, 5-yr graft survival was similar between the 3 groups, 94%, 97% and 92% for IGF, SGF and DGF respectively. In the presence of AR, 5-yr graft survival was significantly reduced in all groups, but most notably in those with SGF (51%) or DGF (53%), as compared to those with IGF (80%), (p < 0.001). We conclude that recipients with SGF, but no AR, have excellent outcomes, comparable to those with IGF. However, there is an increased incidence of early AR associated with SGF. In recipients with SGF or DGF, AR has a more profound detrimental effect on long-term graft survival than in the IGF group. Thus, recipients with SGF are at increased risk for AR with resultant poor long-term graft survival, and may need modified immunosuppressive protocols.

Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Short- and long-term patient and graft survival rates are better for living donor (vs. cadaver) kidney transplant recipients. However, donor nephrectomy is associated with at least some morbidity and mortality. We have previously estimated the mortality of living donor nephrectomy to be 0.03%. In our present study, to determine associated perioperative morbidity, we reviewed donor nephrectomies performed at our institution from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1995.

METHODS

The records of 871 donors were complete and available for review. Of these donors, 380 (44%) were male and 491 (56%) were female. The mean age at the time of donation was 38 years (range: 17-74 years), and mean postoperative stay was 4.9 days (range: 2-14 days).

RESULTS

We noted two (0.2%) major complications: femoral nerve compression with resulting weakness, and a retained sponge that required reexploration. We noted 86 minor complications in 69 (8%) donors: 22 (2.4%) suspected wound infections (only 1 wound was opened), 13 (1.5%) pneumothoraces (6 required intervention, 7 resolved spontaneously), 11 (1.3%) unexplained fevers, 8 (0.9%) instances of operative blood loss > or = 750 ml (not associated with other complications), 8 (0.9%) pneumonias (all of which resolved quickly with antibiotics alone), 5 (0.6%) wound hematomas or seromas (none were opened), 4 (0.5%) phlebitic intravenous sites, 3 (0.3%) urinary tract infections, 3 (0.3%) readmissions (2 for pain control and 1 for mild confusion that resolved with discontinuation of narcotics), 3 (0.3%) cases of atelectasis, 2 (0.2%) corneal abrasions, 1 (0.1%) subacute epididymitis, 1 (0.1%) Clostridium difficile colitis, 1 (0.1%) urethral trauma from catheter placement, and 1 (0.1%) enterotomy. At our institution, no donor died or required ventilation or intensive care. We noted no myocardial infarctions, deep wound infections, or reexplorations for bleeding. Analysis, by logistic regression, identified these significant risk factors for perioperative complications: male gender (vs. female, P<0.001), pleural entry (vs. no pleural entry, P<0.004), and weight > or = 100 kg (vs. < 100 kg, P<0.02). Similar analysis identified these significant risk factors for postoperative stay > 5 days: operative duration > or = 4 hr (vs. < 4 hr, P<0.001) and age > or = 50 years (vs. < 50 years, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Living donor nephrectomy can be done with little major morbidity. The risks of nephrectomy must be balanced against the better outcome for recipients of living donor transplants.

Grandparent donors in a living related renal transplant program

Clinical renal transplantation is limited by the number of cadaver and living related donors. The use of kidneys from older donors and non-first-degree relatives, including grandparents, has increased the supply of organs for transplantation. The purpose of this study was to assess donor and recipient outcomes after living related renal transplants between grandparent donors and grandchild recipients. Fifteen living related renal transplants using grandparent donors were performed at the University of Minnesota from 1971 to 1995. All medical records from donors and recipients were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, all grandparents or, in one case, a surviving family member were contacted to obtain current information on medical health and feedback about the donation process. A current serum creatinine (Cr) level was obtained from 14 donors and 15 recipients. Statistical calculations were performed using the SAS system. Eleven grandmothers and four grandfathers, 34-70 yr old (mean, 55 yr) at the time of transplantation, donated a kidney to 15 grandchildren with end-stage renal disease. There were no major surgical complications in either group. One donor died from unrelated causes; the other 14 donors are alive with stable renal function (1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dL). Of 15 transplanted kidneys, 10 remain functional (Cr 1.3 +/- 0.7 mg/dL) with 2- and 5-yr graft survival rates of 76% and 63%, respectively. Our results indicate that healthy grandparents provide an excellent population for living related kidney donation.

Complications by age in primary pediatric renal transplant recipients

We asked whether pediatric renal transplant recipients, subgrouped by age, differed in the percentage and number of hospital readmissions and in the incidence of infectious complications post transplant. Between 1 August 1985 and 31 October 1993, a total of 164 patients < 18 years of age underwent primary transplants, with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, at the University of Minnesota. The percentage of readmissions (P = NS), the mean number of readmissions (P = NS), and the length of hospital stay during readmissions (P = NS) did not differ significantly among age groups. The overall incidence of acute rejection was greater in those > or = 2 years than those < 2 years (P = 0.002), and in living donor recipients > or = 2 years versus those < 2 years (P = 0.02). The incidence of bacterial infection (< 2 years, 87%; 2-5 years, 72%; 6-12 years, 51%; 13-17 years, 40%) was greater in younger recipients (P = 0.0001). The most common bacterial infection in recipients < or = 5 years was Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; in those > 5 years, urinary tract infection. The overall incidence of viral infection did not differ among groups (P = NS). The most common viral infection in recipients < or = 5 years was varicella and those > 5 years, cytomegalovirus infection. Risk factors for infection in the first 6 months post transplant included age < 2 years and Solu-Medrol treatment for acute rejection. In conclusion, young recipients < 2 years of age at the time of transplant are at a higher risk for bacterial infection post transplant.

Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization after kidney transplants

A major variable in the cost of kidney transplants is the length of initial hospitalization. Using multivariate analysis, we studied risk factors for hospital stay > 10 d post-transplant. Between 1 January 1985 and 31 August 1995 a total of 1588 patients underwent first or second kidney transplants at the University of Minnesota. Antibody was used for 1 wk in cadaver donor recipients and for 2 wk in pediatric recipients (resulting in a long stay for all pediatric recipients). Adult living related donor recipients were immunosuppressed with triple therapy. Donor risk factors studied were age (< 15, 15-50, > 50 yr) and,- for cadaver recipients, preservation time (< 12, 12-18, 18-24, 24-30, > 30 h) and cause of death (trauma, cerebrovascular accident, or cardiac). Recipient risk factors studied were age (< 18, 18-55, > 55 yr); sex; transplant number; antigen mismatch; peak PRA; PRA at transplant (< 11, 11-50, > 50); diabetic status; pretransplant dialysis (vs. pre-emptive transplant); pretransplant cardiac, peripheral vascular, or respiratory disease; and delayed graft function (DGF) (dialysis in the first week vs. no dialysis). Risk factors were analyzed separately for living donor and cadaver donor recipients. For cadaver donor recipients, DGF was the major risk factor (p < 0.0001); others were age 55 yr (p = 0.03) and diabetes (p = 0.02). For living donor recipients, DGF was also a risk factor (p = 0.003); others were diabetes (p = 0.01), retransplant (p = 0.006), PRA at transplant > 50 (p < 0.0001), age > 55 yr (p = 0.02), pretransplant respiratory disease (p = 0.005), and pretransplant dialysis (p = 0.005). Because DGF was the major risk factor for a prolonged stay, we then studied risk factors for DGF using multivariate analysis. For cadaver donor recipients, risk factors were recipient weight > 90 kg (p = 0.004), preservation time 24 h (p = 0.03), PRA at transplant > 50 (p = 0.03), and donor age < 15 or > 50 yr (p = 0.002). For living donor recipients, risk factors were recipient age < 18 yr (p = 0.01), donor age > 50 yr (p = 0.03), female sex (p = 0.05), pretransplant respiratory disease (p = 0.1), pretransplant peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.05), and recipient weight > 90 kg (p = 0.1). From our data, a profile emerged of recipients likely to have a longer hospital stay. Important variables, either simultaneous with or related to DGF, include donor and recipient age, diabetes, pretransplant recipient weight, PRA at transplant, preservation time, and pretransplant respiratory or peripheral vascular disease.

Risk factors for chronic rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients--a single-center experience

Chronic rejection (CR) is the most common cause of graft loss beyond the 1st posttransplant year. The aim of this analysis was to identify the risk factors for the development of CR in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Between June 1984 and March 1994, 217 renal transplants were performed in children at our center. Immunosuppression included prednisone, azathioprine, cyclosporine (CsA), and prophylactic antibody. Using multivariate analysis, we studied the impact of the following variables on the development of biopsy-proven CR: age at transplant (< or = 5 years, > 5 years), gender, race, transplant number (primary, retransplant), donor source (cadaver, living donor), donor age (< 20 years, 20-49 years, > 49 years), number of ABDR mismatches (0, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6), number of DR mismatches (0, 1, 2), percentage peak panel reactive antibody (PRA) (< or = 50%, > 50%), percentage PRA at transplantation (< or = 50%, > 50%), dialysis pretransplant, preservation time > 24 h, acute tubular necrosis requiring dialysis, initial CsA dosage (< or = 5 mg/kg per day, > 5 mg/kg per day), CsA dosage at 1 year posttransplant (< or = 5 mg/kg per day, > 5 mg/kg per day), acute rejection (AR), number of AR episodes (ARE) (1, > 1), timing of AR (< or = 6 months, > 6 months), reversibility of AR (complete, partial), and infection [cytomegalovirus (CMV), non-CMV viral, bacterial]. Risk factors for the development of CR in pediatric renal transplant recipients were: AR (P < 0.0001, odds ratio 19.4), multiple ARE (> 1 vs. 1) (P < 0.0001, odds ratio 30.1), and high percentage peak PRA (> 50%) (P < 0.03, odds ratio 3.6).

Recurrence of haemolytic-uraemic syndrome in renal transplants: a single-centre report

BACKGROUND

The incidence of recurrence of haemolytic-uraemic syndrome (HUS) in renal allografts appears to vary by centre, with the highest rates reported from the University of Minnesota. It is possible that the high rate of HUS recurrence at this institution reflects a transplant population skewed towards patients with a form of HUS that is more likely to recur in the allograft.

METHODS

This study examined whether the initial episode of HUS in the native kidneys was preceded by a diarrhoeal prodrome ('classical HUS') or not ('atypical HUS'), and evaluated transplant outcomes in 24 patients who received 36 transplants at the University of Minnesota between 31 May 1972 and 31 December 1994.

RESULTS

Eighteen of the 24 patients had atypical HUS, three had classical HUS, and in three patients the presence or absence of a diarrhoeal prodrome could not be determined. Recurrent HUS, defined as microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, and allograft biopsy findings compatible with HUS, occurred 16 times in 14 grafts in 11 patients. Nine of these patients had atypical HUS, one had classical HUS, and in one the nature of the prodrome could not be determined. Eleven of the 14 initial recurrences took place within 2 months of transplant. Recurrence was not more frequent in patients who received cyclosporin or antilymphocyte preparations. Actuarial analysis using matched controls showed poorer graft survival in patients with a primary diagnosis of HUS (P = 0.007), due to the high frequency of graft loss in HUS patients with recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Based upon these data and a review of the literature, it can be concluded that the risk of recurrence of HUS in the allograft is confined almost entirely to patients with atypical forms of HUS.

A third kidney transplant: cost-effective treatment for end-stage renal disease?

Given the organ donor shortage, some question whether a third kidney transplant can be justified. We studied the outcome of 51 third transplants (mean age 28 +/- 2 yr) done between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 1994. We compared hospital stay (mean +/- S.E.), cost, readmissions, readmission days, and outcome of third (vs. first and second) transplants. We found that patient survival for third transplants was equivalent to first and second transplants; graft survival was not as good. However, when third transplant recipients with recurrent disease (specifically, hemolytic uremic syndrome and focal sclerosis) were excluded from our analysis, we found no difference in 5-yr graft survival (vs. first or second transplant recipients). Of the 51 third transplant recipients, 41 had a cadaver donor transplant. Third cadaver transplant recipients tended to have a longer hospital stay (p = NS) than first cadaver transplant recipients but had no more readmissions or readmission days than first and second cadaver transplant recipients. Employment data are available for 28 third transplant recipients; 16 (57%) are currently working or going to school. Of the 21 recipients who responded to quality of life questionnaires, 17 (81%) reported being healthy and all 21 (100%) said transplantation was not a drawback to their health. We conclude that third transplants should be considered for selected patients with renal failure whose first and second transplants have failed. Such patients can often be successfully transplanted.

The importance of early cyclosporine levels in pediatric kidney transplantation

We studied the impact of early cyclosporine (CSA) levels on the incidence of rejection in pediatric transplant recipients. Between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 1994, a total of 234 pediatric patients underwent kidney transplants and received CSA immunosuppression. We analyzed the impact of CSA levels (at 1 wk, 2 wk, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months) on the incidence of rejection in the first 3 and the first 6 months post-transplant. We found that CSA levels at all timepoints correlated, i.e. recipients with low levels in the early post-transplant period tended to have low levels throughout the first 12 months. Multivariate analysis for risk factors by biopsy-proven rejection in the first 3 months revealed that the CSA trough level was the critical factor (p < 0.05). Recipients with CSA trough levels < 100 ng/ml had 2.24 times the risk of rejections vs. those with blood levels > 100 ng/ml. Similarly, the CSA trough level at 1 month was the critical risk factor for biopsy-proven rejection within the first 6 months (p < 0.05). The major risk factor for graft loss within the first 12 months was a biopsy-proven rejection episode. We conclude that in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, early CSA trough levels < 100 ng/ml are associated with a significantly increased incidence of rejection in the first 6 months post-transplant.

Delayed graft function in the absence of rejection has no long-term impact. A study of cadaver kidney recipients with good graft function at 1 year after transplantation

We previously reported that delayed graft function (DGF) in the absence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (Rej) had no effect on outcome of primary cadaver kidney transplantation (TX). By contrast, DGF in combination with Rej strongly predicted poor long-term graft survival. We asked whether this poor long-term outcome was due to early graft loss associated with DGF, or to an ongoing process leading to late graft loss. To answer this question, we studied a subset of 298 cadaver kidney transplant recipients who had not suffered early graft loss and had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX. The incidence of DGF (defined by dialysis during the first week after TX) in this subset was 19%. DGF was associated with cold ischemia time >24 hr (P = 0.0003) and Rej (P = 0.06). For grafts with versus without DGF, the incidence of late acute Rej (>1 year after TX) was similar. Actuarial graft survival was similar for Rej-free recipients with versus without DGF (P = 0.9) and was worse for those with Rej and no DGF (P < 0.02). Importantly, however, in our recipients who all had a serum creatinine level < or = 2.0 mg/dl at 1 year after TX, the worst long-term outcome was noted in the subgroup with both DGF and Rej (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, DGF was also only a risk factor in combination with Rej (P = 0.002, relative risk = 3.7), while a 0-antigen HLA mismatch had no impact. Patient survival decreased for recipients with both DGF and Rej by univariate (P = 0.009) and multivariate (P = 0.02, relative risk = 2.9) analyses. We conclude that DGF without Rej has no impact on long-term survival. However, our data for recipients with both DGF and Rej suggest that a chronic ongoing process leads to late graft failure. Further research is necessary to identify the exact pathophysiology of this process, which appears to be, at least in part, HLA antigen independent.

Chronic renal allograft rejection in the first 6 months posttransplant

Between May 1, 1986 and May 31, 1992 at the University of Minnesota, we interpreted 129 renal allograft biopsy specimens (done in 48 grafts during the first 6 months posttransplant) as showing changes consistent with chronic rejection. For this retrospective analysis, we reexamined these biopsies together with clinical information to determine: (a) whether a diagnosis other than chronic rejection would have been more appropriate, (b) how early posttransplant any chronic rejection changes occurred, and (c) if the diagnosis correlated with outcome. We found that (1) chronic rejection is uncommon in the first 6 months posttransplant; it was documented in only 27 (2.4%) of 1117 renal allografts and was preceded by acute rejection in all but 3 recipients (for these 3, the first biopsy specimen showed both acute and chronic rejection). (2) Chronic vascular rejection was seen in 1 recipient as early as 1 month posttransplant; the incidence increased over time and was associated with an actual graft survival rate of only 35%. (3) The most frequent cause of arterial intimal fibrosis in the first 6 months posttransplant was arteriosclerotic nephrosclerosis (ASNS) of donor origin. Long-term graft function for recipients with ASNS was 67%. (4) Early-onset ischemia or thrombosis was seen in 14 recipients and predicted poor outcome: only 35.7% of these recipients had long-term graft function. (5) Cyclosporine (CsA) toxicity was implicated in only 3 recipients, who had mild diffuse interstitial fibrosis in association with elevated CsA levels. Other variables (including systemic hypertension, urinary tract infection, obstructive uropathy, neurogenic bladder, cobalt therapy, and recurrent disease) were not significantly associated with chronic renal lesions in the first 6 months posttransplant. A significant number of biopsies were originally interpreted as showing chronic rejection, but the diagnosis was changed upon reevaluation in conjunction with clinical data. We conclude that many factors coexist to produce chronic lesions in biopsies during the first 6 months posttransplant, so clinical correlation is needed before establishing a diagnosis of chronic rejection.

Effect of cyclosporine on renal function in kidney transplant recipients: a 12-year follow-up

Nephrotoxicity remains a concern for patients on long-term cyclosporine. We have previously reported on renal function in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients followed up to 10 years posttransplant. The current study extends the analysis to 12 years. We find no evidence of cyclosporine-induced renal failure.

Delayed graft function, acute rejection, and outcome after cadaver renal transplantation. The multivariate analysis

The impact of delayed graft function on outcome after cadaver renal transplantation has been controversial, but most authors fail to control their analyses for the presence or absence of rejection. We studied 457 adult recipients of primary cadaver allografts at a single institution during the cyclosporine era. All patients received sequential immunosuppression. The incidence of delayed graft function (defined as dialysis being required during the first week after transplant) was 23%. There was a significant association between delayed graft function and cold ischemia time > 24 hr (P = 0.0001) and between delayed graft function and the occurrence of at least one biopsy-proven rejection episode (P = 0.004). Actuarial graft survival was not significantly different when comparing delayed graft function versus no delayed graft function for patients without rejection (P = 0.02). However, it was significantly worse for patients with both delayed graft function and rejection versus those with delayed graft function but no rejection (P = 0.005), as well as for grafts preserved > 24 hr versus < or = 24 hr (P = 0.007). By multivariate analysis, delayed graft function per se was not a significant risk factor for decreased graft survival for patients without rejection (P = 0.42). In contrast, rejection significantly decreased graft survival for grafts with immediate function (relative risk = 2.3, P = 0.0002), particularly in combination with delayed graft function (relative risk = 4.2, P < 0.0001). While cold ischemia time > 24 hr was also a significant risk factor (relative risk = 1.9, P = 0.02), other variables (preservation mode, 0 HLA Ag mismatch, age at transplantation, gender, diabetic status, and panel-reactive antibody at transplantation) had no impact on graft survival. Patient survival was significantly affected by the combination of delayed graft function and rejection (relative risk = 3.1, P < 0.0001), age at transplantation > 50 years (relative risk = 2.6, P < 0.0001), and diabetes (relative risk = 1.8, P = 0.006). Further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanisms linking delayed graft function and rejection, which, in combination, lead to poor allograft outcome.