Standardising clinical outcomes measures for adult clinical trials in Fabry disease: A global Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Recent years have witnessed a considerable increase in clinical trials of new investigational agents for Fabry disease (FD). Several trials investigating different agents are currently in progress; however, lack of standardisation results in challenges to interpretation and comparison. To facilitate the standardisation of investigational programs, we have developed a common framework for future clinical trials in FD.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A broad consensus regarding clinical outcomes and ways to measure them was obtained via the Delphi methodology. 35 FD clinical experts from 4 continents, representing 3389 FD patients, participated in 3 rounds of Delphi procedure. The aim was to reach a consensus regarding clinical trial design, best treatment comparator, clinical outcomes, measurement of those clinical outcomes and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consensus results of this initiative included: the selection of the adaptative clinical trial as the ideal study design and agalsidase beta as ideal comparator treatment due to its longstanding use in FD. Renal and cardiac outcomes, such as glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and left ventricular mass index, were prioritised, whereas neurological outcomes including cerebrovascular and white matter lesions were dismissed as a primary or secondary outcome measure. Besides, there was a consensus regarding the importance of patient-related outcomes such as general quality of life, pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Also, unity about lysoGb3 and Gb3 tissue deposits as useful surrogate markers of the disease was obtained. The group recognised that cardiac T1 mapping still has potential but requires further development before its widespread introduction in clinical trials. Finally, patients with end-stage renal disease or renal transplant should be excluded unless a particular group for them is created inside the clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

This consensus will help to shape the future of clinical trials in FD. We note that the FDA has, coincidentally, recently published draft guidelines on clinical trials in FD and welcome this contribution.

Gender medicine and oncology: report and consensus of an ESMO workshop

BACKGROUND

The importance of sex and gender as modulators of disease biology and treatment outcomes is well known in other disciplines of medicine, such as cardiology, but remains an undervalued issue in oncology. Considering the increasing evidence for their relevance, European Society for Medical Oncology decided to address this topic and organized a multidisciplinary workshop in Lausanne, Switzerland, on 30 November and 1 December 2018.

DESIGN

Twenty invited faculty members and 40 selected physicians/scientists participated. Relevant content was presented by faculty members on the basis of a literature review conducted by each speaker. Following a moderated consensus session, the final consensus statements are reported here.

RESULTS

Clinically relevant sex differences include tumour biology, immune system activity, body composition and drug disposition and effects. The main differences between male and female cells are sex chromosomes and the level of sexual hormones they are exposed to. They influence both local and systemic determinants of carcinogenesis. Their effect on carcinogenesis in non-reproductive organs is largely unknown. Recent evidence also suggests differences in tumour biology and molecular markers. Regarding body composition, the difference in metabolically active, fat-free body mass is one of the most prominent: in a man and a woman of equal weight and height, it accounts for 80% of the man's and 65% of the woman's body mass, and is not taken into account in body-surface area based dosing of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Sex differences in cancer biology and treatment deserve more attention and systematic investigation. Interventional clinical trials evaluating sex-specific dosing regimens are necessary to improve the balance between efficacy and toxicity for drugs with significant pharmacokinetic differences. Especially in diseases or disease subgroups with significant differences in epidemiology or outcomes, men and women with non-sex-related cancers should be considered as biologically distinct groups of patients, for whom specific treatment approaches merit consideration.

Predicting decline of kidney function in lupus nephritis using urine biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate candidate biomarkers to predict future renal function decline (RFD) in children and adults with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

At the time of enrollment into prospective observational LN cohort studies liver-type fatty acid binding protein (LFABP), albumin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), uromodulin, transferrin, and hepcidin were measured in urine samples of two cohorts of patients with LN, one followed at a pediatric (cohort-1; n = 28) and one at an adult institution (cohort-2; n = 69). The primary outcome was RFD, defined in cohort-1 as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥20% and in cohort-2 as a sustained increase of ≥25% in serum creatinine concentration (SCr), both from baseline.

RESULTS

All patients (n = 97) had normal eGFR or SCr at the time of urine collection at baseline. RFD occurred in 29% (8/28) of patients in cohort-1 during a mean follow-up of 6.1 months, and in 30% (21/69) of those in cohort-2 during a mean follow-up of 60 months. Individually, in cohort-1, levels of MCP-1, transferrin, LFABP, and albumin were higher in the RFD group than those who maintained renal function, with statistical significance for LFABP and albumin. In cohort-2 the RFD group also had higher levels of urine MCP-1 and albumin than others. The combination of LFABP, MCP-1, albumin, and transferrin had good predictive accuracy for RFD in both cohorts (area under the ROC curve = 0.77-0.82).

CONCLUSION

The combinatorial urine biomarker LFABP, MCP-1, albumin, and transferrin shows promise as a predictor of renal functional decline in LN, and warrants further investigation.

Simulation-based study comparing multiple imputation methods for non-monotone missing ordinal data in longitudinal settings

The application of multiple imputation (MI) techniques as a preliminary step to handle missing values in data analysis is well established. The MI method can be classified into two broad classes, the joint modeling and the fully conditional specification approaches. Their relative performance for the longitudinal ordinal data setting under the missing at random (MAR) assumption is not well documented. This article intends to fill this gap by conducting a large simulation study on the estimation of the parameters of a longitudinal proportional odds model. The two MI methods are also illustrated in quality of life data from a cancer clinical trial.

Local recurrence rates after radiofrequency ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases. Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer #40004 and #40983

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe local tumour control after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (RES) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in two independent European Organisations for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) studies.

BACKGROUND

Only 10-20% of patients with newly diagnosed CLM are eligible for curative RES. RFA has found a place in daily practice for unresectable CLM. There are no prospective trials comparing RFA to RES for resectable CLM.

METHODS

The CLOCC trial randomised 119 patients with unresectable CLM between RFA (±RES)+adjuvant FOLFOX (±bevacizumab) versus FOLFOX (±bevacizumab) alone. The EPOC trial randomised 364 patients with resectable CLM between RES±perioperative FOLFOX. We describe the local control of resected patients with lesions ≤4 cm in the perioperative chemotherapy arm of the EPOC trial (N=81) and the RFA arm of the CLOCC trial (N=55).

RESULTS

Local recurrence (LR) rate for RES was 7.4% per patient and 5.5% per lesion. LR rate for RFA was 14.5% per patient and 6.0% per lesion. When lesion size was limited to 30 mm, LR rate for RFA lesions was 2.9% per lesion. Non-local hepatic recurrences were more often observed in RFA patients than in RES patients, 30.9% and 22.3% respectively. Patients receiving RFA had a more advanced disease.

CONCLUSIONS

LR rate after RFA for lesions with a limited size is low. The local control per lesion does not appear to differ greatly between RFA and surgical resection. This study supports the local control of RFA in patients with limited liver metastases. Future studies should evaluate in which patients RFA could be an equal alternative to liver resection.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized EORTC Intergroup phase II study (EORTC 40004)

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the possible benefits of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

This phase II study, originally started as a phase III design, randomly assigned 119 patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases between systemic treatment (n = 59) or systemic treatment plus RFA ( ± resection) (n = 60). Primary objective was a 30-month overall survival (OS) rate >38% for the combined treatment group.

RESULTS

The primary end point was met, 30-month OS rate was 61.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48.2-73.9] for combined treatment. However, 30-month OS for systemic treatment was 57.6% (95% CI 44.1-70.4), higher than anticipated. Median OS was 45.3 for combined treatment and 40.5 months for systemic treatment (P = 0.22). PFS rate at 3 years for combined treatment was 27.6% compared with 10.6% for systemic treatment only (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95, P = 0.025). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 11.7-22.1) and 9.9 months (95% CI 9.3-13.7), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized study on the efficacy of RFA. The study met the primary end point on 30-month OS; however, the results in the control arm were in the same range. RFA plus systemic treatment resulted in significant longer PFS. At present, the ultimate effect of RFA on OS remains uncertain.

New strategies and designs in pancreatic cancer research: consensus guidelines report from a European expert panel

Although the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a huge challenge, it is entering a new era with the development of new strategies and trial designs. Because there is an increasing number of novel therapeutic agents and potential combinations available to test in patients with PDAC, the identification of robust prognostic and predictive markers and of new targets and relevant pathways is a top priority as well as the design of adequate trials incorporating molecular-driven hypothesis. We presently report a consensus strategy for research in pancreatic cancer that was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts from different European institutions and collaborative groups involved in pancreatic cancer. The expert panel embraces the concept of exploratory early proof of concept studies, based on the prediction of response to novel agents and combinations, and randomised phase II studies permitting the selection of the best therapeutic approach to go forward into phase III, where the recommended primary end point remains overall survival. Trials should contain as many translational components as possible, relying on standardised tissue and blood processing and robust biobanking, and including dynamic imaging. Attention should not only be paid to the pancreatic cancer cells but also to microenvironmental factors and stem/stellate cells.

Adaptive designs at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) with a focus on adaptive sample size re-estimation based on interim-effect size

Given the high failure rates and the increased costs of Phase III trials in oncology and the recent explosion of targeted agents, researchers are looking for better design strategies to try and optimise the use of available patients and financial resources. In this context, adaptive designs are seen as promising tools. We reviewed the different possible adaptations in the design of a clinical trial on the basis of the FDA guidance and summarized these. The pro and cons of adaptive designs are highlighted with a focus on one of the more 'controversial' adaptive designs, the sample size reassessment based on interim-effect size as proposed by Mehta and Pocock. While group sequential designs are preferable to such adaptive designs, both are difficult to implement in the case of rapid accrual and long time to event. Adaptive designs may have some potential in less favourable situations. However, the increase in overall power should be carefully weighted as well as the risk of a large negative trial. Adaptive designs need good, sometimes extensive, logistics. Some adaptive designs (e.g. group sequential designs) proved to be very useful and are already a part of the standard repertoire of trial designs used at European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Adaptive designs need strong measures to prevent bias that could otherwise become uncontrollable, particularly if interim results are leaked. This includes a prospective planning of adaptations. Finally, these studies currently have the potential to induce a heavy workload and cost linked to their regulatory management.

Expression of dUTP nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase) and thymidylate synthase (TS) in stage III colon cancer patients treated with either bolus 5-FU or infusional 5-FU in the adjuvant setting: Results of a translational study of the PETACC-2 trial

417

Background: Pts with stage III colon cancer have been treated with either infusional 5-FU or bolus 5- FU in the adjuvant setting (PETACC-2 trial). DUTPase and TS demonstrated potential as predictive markers for 5-FU efficacy in pts with advanced colorectal cancer. Here we aimed to explore whether TS or dUTPase protein levels may predict recurrence of disease for stage III colon pts treated with 5-FU.

Methods: Tumor (T) blocks of 324 pts were analyzed for protein expression of dUTPase and TS. For analysis monoclonal antibodies DUT415 and TS106 were used. T were evaluated by two investigators as follows. Only nuclear staining for both, TS and dUTPase, was analyzed. If tumor cells (TC) showed a nuclear dUTPase expression in >10% of cells, the sample was scored positive. Positive nuclear staining for >20% of TC, when using the TS antibody, determined a positive sample.

Results: Analysis for dUTPase was successful in 308 samples (95.1%, 308/324). 263 out of those 308 pts showed a positive dUTPase expression (85.3%). 297/324 samples (91.7%) could be evaluated for TS. In the TS group 62.3% (185/297) showed a positive expression for TS protein. In 281 cases analyses were successful for both TS and dUTPase. We observed a significant association between dUTPase and TS expression with a majotity of 71.4% (172/241) dUTPase positive T also being positive for TS as compared to 32.5% (13/40) of dUTPase negative T that showed positivity for TS protein expression (p< 0.0001). Of pts with dUTPase positive T 64.7% showed no recurrence of disease as compared to 44.7% of those with dUTPase negative T 5 years after completion of therapy (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.36, 1.03], p=0.06). No associations between TS and DFS were observed. Both TS and dUTPase expression did not correlate with OS in this patient cohort.

Conclusions: High TS protein levels appeared to be significantly correlated with high protein levels of dUTPase in stage III colon cancer pts. Neither dUTPase nor TS protein levels appeared to be significantly associated with DFS or OS of stage III colon cancer pts that received adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The relationship of retinal vessel diameter to changes in diabetic nephropathy structural variables in patients with type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We examined whether retinal vessel diameter in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with changes in subclinical anatomical and functional indicators of diabetic nephropathy.

METHODS

Persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus had gradable fundus photographs and renal biopsy data at baseline and 5-year follow-up (n = 234). Retinal arteriolar and venular diameters were measured at baseline and follow-up. Central retinal arteriole equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal venule equivalent (CRVE) were computed. Baseline and 5-year follow-up renal structural variables were assessed by masked electron microscopic morphometric analyses from percutaneous renal biopsy specimens. Variables assessed included: mesangial fractional volume, glomerular basement membrane width, mesangial matrix fractional volume and glomerular basement membrane width composite glomerulopathy index.

RESULTS

While controlling for other covariates, baseline CRAE was positively associated with change in the glomerulopathy index over the 5-year period. Change in CRAE was inversely related to a change in mesangial matrix fractional volume and abnormal mesangial matrix fractional volume, while change in CRVE was directly related to change in the volume fraction of cortex that was interstitium [Vv((Int/cortex))] over the 5-year period. Baseline CRAE or CRVE or changes in these diameters were not related to changes in other anatomical or functional renal endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Independently of other factors, baseline CRAE correlated with changes in glomerulopathy index, a composite measure of extracellular matrix accumulation in the mesangium and glomerular basement membrane. A narrowing of the CRAE was related to mesangial matrix accumulation. Changes in CRVE were related to changes in Vv((Int/cortex),) a measure of interstitial expansion in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Adjuvant gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine-based chemoradiation after curative resection for pancreatic cancer: Updated results of a randomized EORTC/FFCD/GERCOR phase II study (40013–22012/9203)

4527

Background: The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in resectable pancreatic cancer is debated. This randomized phase II intergroup study demonstrated the feasibility and tolerability of a gemcitabine-based CRT regimen after R0 resection of pancreatic head cancer (Proc ASCO 2008, 4514). Long term and survival data are now reported. Methods: Patients were randomized within 8 weeks after surgery to receive either 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 given over 30 minutes every 3 weeks (control arm) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for 2 cycles followed by weekly gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 with concurrent radiation of 50.4 Gy given in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy (experimental arm). The co-primary endpoints were completion of treatment and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were late toxicity, DFS and OS. Results: Between 9/04 and 1/07, 90 patients were randomized by 29 centers (45:45). Treatment arms were balanced in terms of patient/tumour characteristics. Follow-up was equal for both arms with an overall median follow-up of 27.1 months. In the control arm, 5 patients were ineligible, including 2 not treated. In the experimental arm, CRT was delivered to 36 of 45 patients (80%). Treatment was completed per protocol by 86.7% and 73.3% (80% CI 63.1–81.9%) of randomized patients in the control and experimental arms, respectively. Grade 4 toxicity was 0% and 4.4%, respectively. In the CRT arm, 2 patients experienced grade 3 late toxicity (anorexia 1 and epigastric pain 1). In the CRT experimental arm, 33 DFS events were noted and 23 deaths versus 34 and 24, respectively, in the control arm. Median DFS was 12 months in the experimental arm vs. 11 months in the control arm (p=0.6). Median overall survival was 24 months both in the experimental arm and the control arm. Distant progression was similar in both arms while the rate of first local recurrence was lower in the chemoradiation arm (11 vs 24 %, p=0.16). Conclusions: Post-op modern gemcitabine-based CRT is feasible and well- tolerated after long-term follow-up, and a larger trial should assess its true benefit to that of standard gemcitabine alone.

[Table: see text]

The kidney in diabetes: dynamic pathways of injury and repair. The Camillo Golgi Lecture 2007

Diabetic nephropathy is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The natural history of diabetic nephropathy has changed over the last decades, as a consequence of better metabolic and blood pressure management. Thus, it may now be possible to delay or halt the progression towards ESRD in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy, and the decline of renal function is not always inexorable and unavoidable. Also, the rate of progression from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy is much lower than originally estimated in the early 80s. Furthermore, there is now evidence that it is possible, in humans, to obtain reversal of the established lesions of diabetic nephropathy. This review focuses on the contribution of kidney biopsy studies to the understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of diabetic nephropathy and the identification of patients at high risk of progression to ESRD. The classic lesions of diabetic nephropathy and the well-established structural-functional relationships in type 1 diabetes will be briefly summarised and the renal lesions leading to renal dysfunction in type 2 diabetes will be described. The relevance of these biopsy studies to diabetic nephropathy pathogenesis will be outlined. Finally, the evidence and the possible significance of reversibility of diabetic renal lesions will be discussed, as well as future directions for research in this field.

The prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in glioblastoma cancer patients: results from an international randomised phase III EORTC Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups, and NCIC Clinical Trials Group study

This is one of the few studies that have explored the value of baseline symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in predicting survival in brain cancer patients. Baseline HRQOL scores (from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Brain Cancer Module (BN 20)) were examined in 490 newly diagnosed glioblastoma cancer patients for the relationship with overall survival by using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Refined techniques as the bootstrap re-sampling procedure and the computation of C-indexes and R²-coefficients were used to try and validate the model. Classical analysis controlled for major clinical prognostic factors selected cognitive functioning (P=0.0001), global health status (P=0.0055) and social functioning (P<0.0001) as statistically significant prognostic factors of survival. However, several issues question the validity of these findings. C-indexes and R²-coefficients, which are measures of the predictive ability of the models, did not exhibit major improvements when adding selected or all HRQOL scores to clinical factors. While classical techniques lead to positive results, more refined analyses suggest that baseline HRQOL scores add relatively little to clinical factors to predict survival. These results may have implications for future use of HRQOL as a prognostic factor in cancer patients.

Gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC): A prospective phase II study

14024

Background: We have found that the combination of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX), when administered in a specific sequence, will induce a p53 independent pathway of cell death through the MAP kinase pathway. The sequence overcomes drug resistance in PC cells in vitro. We have begun a prospective, phase II trial of GTX in patients with metastatic PC as first-line therapy. Methods: 23 patients with metastatic PC, ECOG 0–2 were enrolled at either Columbia or a community practice. Each cycle was administered over a 21 days. Capecitabine was administered at 750 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days. Gemcitabine (750 mg/m2 over 75 minutes) and docetaxel (30 mg/m2) were administered on days 4 and 11. Responses were measured by CT (RECIST) and PET after every three cycles. A response by PET was defined as a 50% reduction in SUV while a CR was an absence of uptake. Results: Median age was 61, including 8 men and 15 women. Metastatic sites included liver (87%), abdomen (65%), and lung (17%). 70% of liver positive patients had at least five metastases. 22% had malignant ascites. 16 patients remain alive and 7 have progressive disease. Median survival has not yet been reached. Progression occurred at a median of 5.1 months. By CT, the response rate at metastatic sites was 39% (17% CR / 22% PR). Stable disease was observed in 48% at metastatic sites. PET showed a 53% response rate at metastatic sites. At the primary site, CT showed a 30% response rate including 17% complete responses. By PET criteria, there was a 31% response rate and a 26% CR rate at the primary site. In three patients, a PET response heralded a CT response by three cycles. In one patient, progressive disease on PET preceded progression on CT by two months. Toxicity: Grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were 13% and 9%, respectively. There was no grade four hematologic toxicity. One patient experienced lung disease related to gemcitabine and withdrew from the study. A second patient experienced grade 4 mucositis, thrush, and sepsis which was presumed due to DPD deficiency. Grade 3–4 toxicities: HFS: 9%. There was no grade 3–4 diarrhea. Conclusions: GTX, elicits a promising response rate when used in metastatic P.C. PET detects a response and failure of chemotherapy earlier than CT scans.

[Table: see text]

Remodeling of renal interstitial and tubular lesions in pancreas transplant recipients

Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis, important in progression of renal diseases, including diabetic (D) and cyclosporine-induced (CSA) nephropathy, have been considered irreversible. Normoglycemia for 10 years following pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) reversed D glomerulopathy lesions. This study quantified tubular, interstitial, and arteriolar parameters in PTA recipients. Kidney function studies and biopsies were performed in eight non-uremic type I D patients (pts) at 5 and 10 years after PTA. Renal biopsies were analyzed by morphometric analysis. All pts were normoglycemic and insulin independent and received CSA during the study. Cortical interstitial volume fraction was increased at 5 years (0.31+/-0.07 vs normal 0.15+/-0.02, P<0.01) and decreased at 10 years post-PTA (0.23+/-0.03, P<0.02 vs 5 years). There was a reduction in the volume fraction of interstitial collagen and cells per cortical tissue, measured using electron microscopy, from 5 (0.126+/-0.061 and 0.103+/-0.026, respectively) to 10 years (0.079+/-0.031, P<0.05, and 0.074+/-0.018, P<0.05, respectively). The volume fraction of tubules which were atrophic (AT) was abnormal at 5 years (0.160+/-0.090) and decreased from 5 to 10 years (0.044+/-0.034, P<0.02), apparently due to AT reabsorption. The index of arteriolar hyalinosis did not change during the study (1.30+/-0.22 and 1.34+/-0.33 at 5 and 10 years, respectively, nonsignificant). This study demonstrates, for the first time in humans, that interstitial expansion is reversible and that atrophic tubules can be reabsorbed. In contrast, there was no improvement in the arteriolar lesions. Whether this is due to long-term normoglycemia, reduction of CSA dose or other mechanisms is unclear.