1
|
Baretton GB, Lordick F, Gaiser T, Hofheinz R, Horst D, Lorenzen S, Moehler M, Röcken C, Schirmacher P, Stahl M, Thuss-Patience P, Tiemann K. Standardized and quality-assured predictive PD-L1 testing in the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:16231-16238. [PMID: 37874352 PMCID: PMC10620316 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05180-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
As a result of the high approval dynamics and the growing number of immuno-oncological concepts, the complexity of treatment decisions and control in the area of cancers of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and stomach is constantly increasing. Since the treatment indication for PD-1 inhibitors that are currently approved in the European Union is often linked to the expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1), the evaluation of tissue-based predictive markers by the pathologist is of crucial importance for treatment stratification. Even though the immunohistochemical analysis of the PD-L1 expression status is one of the best studied, therapy-relevant biomarkers for an immuno-oncological treatment, due to the high heterogeneity of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract, there are challenges in daily clinical diagnostic work with regard to implementation, standardization and interpretation of testing. An interdisciplinary group of experts from Germany has taken a position on relevant questions from daily pathological and clinical practice, which concern the starting material, quality-assured testing and the interpretation of pathological findings, and has developed recommendations for structured reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo B Baretton
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Medicine II (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pulmonology) and University Cancer Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - T Gaiser
- Institute of Applied Pathology, 67346, Speyer, Germany
| | - R Hofheinz
- University Medicine Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Horst
- Institute of Pathology of the Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Lorenzen
- Department of Medicine III, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - M Moehler
- Department of Medicine I, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - C Röcken
- Institute of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
| | - P Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Stahl
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Germany
| | - P Thuss-Patience
- Charité Center of Tumor Medicine CC14, Charité Campus Virchow-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Tiemann
- Institute of Hematopathology, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stolze T, Franke S, Haybaeck J, Moehler M, Grimminger PP, Lang H, Roth W, Gockel I, Kreuser N, Bläker H, Wittekind C, Lordick F, Vieth M, Veits L, Waidmann O, Lingohr P, Peitz U, Schildberg C, Kruschewski M, Vassos N, Goni E, Bruns CJ, Ridwelski K, Wolff S, Lippert H, Schumacher J, Malfertheiner P, Venerito M. Mismatch repair deficiency, chemotherapy and survival for resectable gastric cancer: an observational study from the German staR cohort and a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1007-1017. [PMID: 35211781 PMCID: PMC9984318 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03953-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In a post hoc analysis of the MAGIC trial, patients with curatively resected gastric cancer (GC) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (MMRd) had better median overall survival (OS) when treated with surgery alone but worse median OS when treated with additional chemotherapy. Further data are required to corroborate these findings. METHODS Between April 2013 and December 2018, 458 patients with curatively resected GC, including cancers of the esophagogastric junction Siewert type II and III, were identified in the German centers of the staR consortium. Tumor sections were assessed for expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 by immunohistochemistry. The association between MMR status and survival was assessed. Similar studies published up to January 2021 were then identified in a MEDLINE search for a meta-analysis. RESULTS MMR-status and survival data were available for 223 patients (median age 66 years, 62.8% male), 23 patients were MMRd (10.3%). After matching for baseline clinical characteristics, median OS was not reached in any subgroup. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd and MMRp had a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.13-3.37, P = 0.63) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.66-3.13, P = 0.36), respectively. The meta-analysis included pooled data from 385 patients. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd had an improved OS with a HR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.14-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas those with MMRp had a HR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.89-1.58, P = 0.26). CONCLUSION Our data support a positive prognostic effect for MMRd in GC patients treated with surgery only and a differentially negative prognostic effect in patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy. MMR status determined by preoperative biopsies may be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients for perioperative chemotherapy in curatively resectable GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Stolze
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S Franke
- Institute of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Haybaeck
- Institute of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology and Molecular Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M Moehler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - P P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - W Roth
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - I Gockel
- Department of Medicine II and University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - N Kreuser
- Department of Medicine II and University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - H Bläker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - C Wittekind
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - F Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - M Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - L Veits
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - O Waidmann
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Main Area Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - P Lingohr
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - U Peitz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Raphaelshospital, Münster, Germany
| | - C Schildberg
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Brandenburg, University Hospital of Visceral Surgery, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - M Kruschewski
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Frankfurt (Oder), Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
| | - N Vassos
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - E Goni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C J Bruns
- Department of General, Tumor and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - K Ridwelski
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Municipal Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.,AN-Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S Wolff
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - H Lippert
- AN-Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Schumacher
- Human Genetics Center, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - P Malfertheiner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-Von-Guericke-Universität, Leipziger Straße 66, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Catenacci DVT, Kang YK, Yoon HH, Shim BY, Kim ST, Oh DY, Spira AI, Ulahannan SV, Avery EJ, Boland PM, Chao J, Chung HC, Gardner F, Klempner SJ, Lee KW, Oh SC, Peguero J, Sonbol MB, Shen L, Moehler M, Sun J, Li D, Rosales MK, Park H. Margetuximab with retifanlimab as first-line therapy in HER2+/PD-L1+ unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: MAHOGANY cohort A. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100563. [PMID: 36029651 PMCID: PMC9588876 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is globally treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Novel therapeutic strategies strive to not only optimize efficacy, but also limit toxicities. In MAHOGANY cohort A, margetuximab, an Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was combined with retifanlimab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 mAb, in the first-line HER2-positive/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive GEA. Patients and methods MAHOGANY cohort A part 1 is a single-arm trial to evaluate margetuximab plus retifanlimab in patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry 3+, PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥1%), and non-microsatellite instability-high tumors. Primary objectives for cohort A were safety/tolerability and the confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Results As of 3 August 2021, 43 patients were enrolled and received margetuximab/retifanlimab. Nine grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in eight (18.6%) patients and eight serious TRAEs in seven (16.3%) patients. There were no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Three patients discontinued margetuximab/retifanlimab because of immune-related adverse events. The ORR by independent assessment was 53% [21/40 (95% confidence interval (CI) 36.1-68.5)], with a median duration of response of 10.3 months (95% CI 4.6-not evaluable); disease control rate was 73% [29/40 (95% CI 56.1-85.4)]. The study sponsor discontinued the study in advance of the planned enrollment when it became apparent that the study design would no longer meet the requirements for drug approval because of recent advances in the treatment of GEA. Conclusions The chemotherapy-free regimen of combined margetuximab/retifanlimab as first-line treatment in double biomarker-selected patients demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile compared with historical outcomes using chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. The ORR observed in this study compares favorably versus ORR observed with other chemotherapy-free approaches. The margetuximab/retifanlimab regimen has a favorable toxicity profile versus historical chemotherapy-based regimens in GEA. The margetuximab/retifanlimab regimen as first-line therapy for GEA met the prespecified boundary for antitumor activity. The 53% ORR [21/40 (95% CI 36.1-68.5)] in the combined regimen compared favorably with other chemotherapy-free approaches. Median duration of response was 10.3 months (95% CI 4.57-not evaluable) and disease control rate was 73% [29/40 (95% CI 56.1-85.4)]. The study was discontinued for business reasons as chemotherapy-based regimens remain the dominant therapy for GEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D V T Catenacci
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Centre, Chicago, USA.
| | - Y-K Kang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - H H Yoon
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | - B Y Shim
- Medical Oncology, The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - S T Kim
- Hematology and Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D-Y Oh
- Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - A I Spira
- Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, USA
| | - S V Ulahannan
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center - Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, USA
| | - E J Avery
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Nebraska Hematology-Oncology, Lincoln, USA
| | - P M Boland
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | - J Chao
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA
| | - H C Chung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - F Gardner
- Medical Oncology, Florida Cancer Specialists, Cape Coral, USA
| | - S J Klempner
- Mass General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - K-W Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam
| | - S C Oh
- Oncology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J Peguero
- Medical Oncology, Oncology Consultants, Houston, USA
| | - M B Sonbol
- Internal Medicine Department, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, USA
| | - L Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - M Moehler
- Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Sun
- MacroGenics, Inc., Rockville, USA
| | - D Li
- MacroGenics, Inc., Rockville, USA
| | | | - H Park
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koessler T, Alsina M, Arnold D, Ben-Aharon I, Collienne M, Lutz MP, Neuzillet C, Obermannova R, Peeters M, Sclafani F, Smyth E, Valle JW, Wagner AD, Wyrwicz L, Fontana E, Moehler M. ESMO Congress 2021: highlights from the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer group's perspective. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100392. [PMID: 35180656 PMCID: PMC8857487 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been no major change of practice in gastrointestinal oncology at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) symposium 2021, but confirmation that immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has become standard of care in several indications. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Track Cancer Group has selected important phase II and III trials presented during the symposium across all gastrointestinal cancers as well as early reports on new drugs or new combinations that may change practice in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Koessler
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Swiss Cancer Center Leman (SCCL), University of Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - M Alsina
- Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Medical Oncology Department, Pamplona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Arnold
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Palliative Care, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - I Ben-Aharon
- Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - M Collienne
- Department of Oncology, Haematology and Palliative Care, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M P Lutz
- Caritasklinikum, Saarbrucken, Germany
| | - C Neuzillet
- GI Oncology, Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie Saint-Cloud, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - R Obermannova
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno; Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - M Peeters
- Department of Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - F Sclafani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Smyth
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - J W Valle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A D Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - L Wyrwicz
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - E Fontana
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK
| | - M Moehler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Catenacci DVT, Chung HC, Shen L, Moehler M, Yoon HH, Rosales MK, Kang YK. Safety and efficacy of HER2 blockade by trastuzumab-based chemotherapy-containing combination strategies in HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100360. [PMID: 34973512 PMCID: PMC8728435 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Since completion of the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer study, trastuzumab with doublet chemotherapy (a fluoropyrimidine and a platinum) has been the gold-standard first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The safety and efficacy of 23 studies of first-line trastuzumab plus doublet chemotherapy, without checkpoint inhibitors (n = 19) or with checkpoint inhibitors (n = 4), conducted in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GEA, including phase II/III, prospective, and retrospective observational studies, were summarized. In studies without checkpoint inhibitors, the median duration of trastuzumab treatment ranged from 19.5 to 39.0 weeks and from 15.3 to 30.0 weeks for chemotherapy. In studies with checkpoint inhibitors, the median duration of pembrolizumab/trastuzumab/chemotherapy was 30 weeks, and 18 weeks for chemotherapy. In studies without checkpoint inhibitors, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade ≥3 ranged from 32% to 84%. Serious adverse events (SAEs) ranged from 15% to 39%. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation ranged from 0% to 30%. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0%-9% of patients. In studies with checkpoint inhibitors, TEAEs of grade ≥3 were 57%. SAEs ranged from 31% to 38%. Adverse events resulting in discontinuation ranged from 5% to 24%. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0%-3% of patients. In studies without checkpoint inhibitors, objective response rate (ORR) ranged from 39% to 82%, median progression-free survival (PFS) from 5.7 to 11.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) from 11.2 to 27.6 months. In studies with checkpoint inhibitors, ORR ranged from 39% to 86%, median PFS from 8.0 to 13.0 months, and median OS from 19.3 to 27.3 months. This review provides a historical benchmark on safety and efficacy of available first-line chemotherapy-based standard of care for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2+ GEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D V T Catenacci
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
| | - H C Chung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - L Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - M Moehler
- Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - H H Yoon
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Y-K Kang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moehler M, Ajani J, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, Mendez G, Feliciano J, Motoyama S, Lièvre A, Uronis H, Elimova E, Grootscholten C, Geboes K, Zhang J, Soleymani S, Lei M, Kondo K, Cleary J, Kelly R. 1381P Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT): 14-month follow-up of CheckMate 577. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
7
|
Janjigian Y, Ajani J, Moehler M, Garrido M, Gallardo C, Shen L, Yamaguchi K, Wyrwicz L, Skoczylas T, Bragagnoli A, Liu T, Tehfe M, Elimova E, Li M, Poulart V, Lei M, Kondo K, Shitara K. LBA7 Nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (Chemo) or ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer/esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): CheckMate 649 study. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
8
|
Pavlakis N, Shitara K, Sjoquist K, Martin A, Jaworski A, Yip S, Oh DY, Moehler M, Chen LT, Bekaii-Saab T, Simes J, Goldstein D. 1438TiP INTEGRATE IIb: A randomised phase III open label study of regorafenib + nivolumab vs standard chemotherapy in refractory advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer (AGOC). Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
9
|
Catenacci D, Koshiji Rosales M, Chung H, Yoon H, Moehler M, Kang Y, Shen L. P-138 Margetuximab combined with anti-PD-1 (retifanlimab) or anti-PD-1/LAG-3 (tebotelimab) +/- chemotherapy in first-line therapy of advanced/metastatic HER2+ gastroesophageal junction or gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
10
|
Holch JW, Held S, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Kaiser F, Heintges T, Kahl C, Kullmann F, Scheithauer W, Moehler M, von Einem JC, Michl M, Heinemann V. Relation of cetuximab-induced skin toxicity and early tumor shrinkage in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the randomized phase 3 trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK0306). Ann Oncol 2021; 31:72-78. [PMID: 31912799 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cetuximab-induced skin toxicity (Cet-ST) is positively associated with outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Besides its predictive relevance for targeted therapy, we investigated its prognostic impact with early tumor shrinkage (ETS) ≥20%, another on-treatment surrogate for clinical outcome in FIRE-3. PATIENTS AND METHODS FIRE-3 evaluated first-line FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) plus cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet) versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI/Bev) in mCRC patients with RAS-WT tumors (i.e. wild-type in KRAS and NRAS exons 2-4). Retrospective data on Cet-ST that occurred during cycles 1-3 of treatment were correlated with efficacy endpoints, including ETS. To control for guarantee-time bias, only patients who had completed three or more treatment cycles were considered. RESULTS Of 199 patients treated with FOLFIRI/Cet, 181 (91.0%) completed three or more treatment cycles. A significant survival benefit of FOLFIRI/Cet over FOLFIRI/Bev was only evident in patients developing Cet-ST grade 2-3 [41.0 versus 26.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.87; P < 0.001] compared with Cet-ST grade 0-1 (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.67-1.20; P = 0.48). Regarding prognosis, Cet-ST grade 2-3 (n = 75; 41.4%), compared with Cet-ST grade 0-1 (n = 106; 58.6%), was associated with prolonged overall survival (OS; HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91; P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, both Cet-ST (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.50-0.87; P = 0.003) and ETS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41-0.74; P < 0.0001) were independently prognostic for OS. Absence of both Cet-ST grade ≥2 and ETS identified a subgroup of patients with very poor prognosis (median OS 15.1 months). CONCLUSIONS In FIRE-3, the addition of cetuximab to FOLFIRI was associated with superior OS compared with FOLFIRI/Bev only in patients developing Cet-ST grade ≥2. Regarding prognostic relevance, both Cet-ST and ETS were independent and early predictors of survival. The present analysis supports that a combined evaluation of on-treatment parameters such as Cet-ST and ETS may help to guide treatment of mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Holch
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - S Stintzing
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - T Decker
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - A Kiani
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - F Kaiser
- Hämato-onkologische Tagesklinik, Landshut, Germany
| | - T Heintges
- Department of Medicine II, Lukaskrankenhaus, Neuss, Germany
| | - C Kahl
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Magdeburg gGmbH, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - F Kullmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany
| | - W Scheithauer
- Department of Internal Medicine I & CCC, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Moehler
- University Medical Center Mainz, I. Department of Internal Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | - J C von Einem
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Michl
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moehler M, Shitara K, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, Wyrwicz L, Yamaguchi K, Skoczylas T, Campos Bragagnoli A, Liu T, Schenker M, Yanez P, Tehfe M, Poulart V, Cullen D, Lei M, Kondo K, Li M, Ajani J, Janjigian Y. LBA6_PR Nivolumab (nivo) plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC)/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): First results of the CheckMate 649 study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
12
|
Lorenzen S, Pauligk C, Götze T, Michael C, Mahlberg R, Schmalenberg H, Biederstädt A, Frost G, Heidel S, Treschl A, Junge S, Hofheinz R, Moehler M, Al-Batran SE. 1502TiP Paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus paclitaxel alone in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus, refractory or intolerant to combination therapy with fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based drugs - RAMOS, a randomized phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
13
|
Kelly R, Ajani J, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, Mendez G, Feliciano J, Motoyama S, Lièvre A, Uronis H, Elimova E, Grootscholten C, Geboes K, Zhang J, Zhu L, Lei M, Kondo K, Cleary J, Moehler M. LBA9_PR Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT): First results of the CheckMate 577 study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
14
|
Xu R, Arkenau T, Bang Y, Denlinger C, Kato K, Tabernero J, Wang J, Li J, Castro H, Moehler M. P-26 RATIONALE 305: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
15
|
Catenacci D, Rosales MK, Chung H, Yoon H, Shen L, Moehler M, Kang Y. P-342 Margetuximab combined with anti-PD-1 (MGA012) or anti-PD-1/LAG-3 (MGD013) +/- chemotherapy in first-line therapy of advanced/metastatic HER2+ gastroesophageal junction or gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
16
|
Moehler M, Maderer A, Thuss-Patience PC, Brenner B, Meiler J, Ettrich TJ, Hofheinz RD, Al-Batran SE, Vogel A, Mueller L, Lutz MP, Lordick F, Alsina M, Borchert K, Greil R, Eisterer W, Schad A, Slotta-Huspenina J, Van Cutsem E, Lorenzen S. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with or without epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition panitumumab for patients with non-resectable, advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a prospective, open-label, randomised phase III AIO/EORTC trial (POWER). Ann Oncol 2019; 31:228-235. [PMID: 31959339 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative chemotherapy of advanced oesophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) consists of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (CF) to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with panitumumab (P); chemotherapy enhanced overall survival (OS) in advanced colorectal or squamous cell head and neck cancers. With prospective serum and tumour biomarkers, we tested if P added to CF (CFP) improved OS in advanced ESCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with confirmed ESCC that was not curatively resectable or did not qualify for definitive radiochemotherapy, were randomised 1 : 1 to receive CF [cisplatin (C) 100 mg/m2 i.v., day 1; 5-fluorouracil (F) 1000 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-4] or CF plus P (9 mg/kg, i.v., day 1, each q3-week cycle) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Safety was reviewed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board after 40, 70 and 100 patients who completed at least one cycle. After 53 enrolled patients, cisplatin was reduced from 100 mg/m2 to 80 mg/m2. RESULTS The trial was stopped early based on interim efficacy results triggered by the third safety analysis: median OS (mOS) favoured CF over CFP, regardless of cisplatin dose [hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.98; P = 0.028]. In the final analysis, mOS was 10.2 versus 9.4 months for CF versus CFP, respectively (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79-1.75; P = 0.43). One hundred (70.4%) of 142 patients in the safety population died, 51 (51.0%) with CFP. Most deaths were related to disease progression [44/49 (90%) deaths in CF versus 34/51 (67%) deaths in CFP]; objective responses [27/73 (37.0%)] were identical. The most common serious adverse events were kidney injury [3 (4.3%) versus 7 (9.7%)], general health deterioration [5 (7.1%) versus 5 (6.9%)] and dysphagia [4 (5.7%) versus 4 (5.6%)] in CF versus CFP, respectively. There were three (4.3%) and 17 (23.6%) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade 5 events in CF versus CFP, respectively. Low soluble (s)EGFR levels were associated with better progression-free survival; sEGFR was induced under CFP. CONCLUSION EGFR inhibition added to CF did not improve survival in unselected advanced ESCC patients. The results support further liquid biopsy studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01627379) and EudraCT (2010-020606-15).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Moehler
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - A Maderer
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - P C Thuss-Patience
- Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - B Brenner
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - J Meiler
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - T J Ettrich
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - R-D Hofheinz
- Medical Department III, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - S E Al-Batran
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research, Hospital North-West, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - L Mueller
- Oncology Leer-Emden-Papenburg, Leer, Germany
| | - M P Lutz
- Gastroenterology, Caritas Hospital, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - F Lordick
- 1st Medical Department and University Cancer Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - M Alsina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - K Borchert
- Medical Department III, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - R Greil
- 3rd Medical Department, Cancer Research Institute, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - W Eisterer
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - A Schad
- Institute of Pathology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Slotta-Huspenina
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - E Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Lorenzen
- Medical Department III, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wagner AD, Oertelt-Prigione S, Adjei A, Buclin T, Cristina V, Csajka C, Coukos G, Dafni U, Dotto GP, Ducreux M, Fellay J, Haanen J, Hocquelet A, Klinge I, Lemmens V, Letsch A, Mauer M, Moehler M, Peters S, Özdemir BC. Gender medicine and oncology: report and consensus of an ESMO workshop. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1914-1924. [PMID: 31613312 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of sex and gender as modulators of disease biology and treatment outcomes is well known in other disciplines of medicine, such as cardiology, but remains an undervalued issue in oncology. Considering the increasing evidence for their relevance, European Society for Medical Oncology decided to address this topic and organized a multidisciplinary workshop in Lausanne, Switzerland, on 30 November and 1 December 2018. DESIGN Twenty invited faculty members and 40 selected physicians/scientists participated. Relevant content was presented by faculty members on the basis of a literature review conducted by each speaker. Following a moderated consensus session, the final consensus statements are reported here. RESULTS Clinically relevant sex differences include tumour biology, immune system activity, body composition and drug disposition and effects. The main differences between male and female cells are sex chromosomes and the level of sexual hormones they are exposed to. They influence both local and systemic determinants of carcinogenesis. Their effect on carcinogenesis in non-reproductive organs is largely unknown. Recent evidence also suggests differences in tumour biology and molecular markers. Regarding body composition, the difference in metabolically active, fat-free body mass is one of the most prominent: in a man and a woman of equal weight and height, it accounts for 80% of the man's and 65% of the woman's body mass, and is not taken into account in body-surface area based dosing of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Sex differences in cancer biology and treatment deserve more attention and systematic investigation. Interventional clinical trials evaluating sex-specific dosing regimens are necessary to improve the balance between efficacy and toxicity for drugs with significant pharmacokinetic differences. Especially in diseases or disease subgroups with significant differences in epidemiology or outcomes, men and women with non-sex-related cancers should be considered as biologically distinct groups of patients, for whom specific treatment approaches merit consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - S Oertelt-Prigione
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Adjei
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - T Buclin
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University, Lausanne
| | - V Cristina
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Csajka
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University, Lausanne; Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Lausanne
| | - G Coukos
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Ludwig Lausanne Branch and Swiss Cancer Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - U Dafni
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - G-P Dotto
- Department of Biochemistry, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; International Cancer Prevention Institute, Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - M Ducreux
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - J Fellay
- Precision Medicine Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne; EPFL School of Life Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J Haanen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Department of Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Hocquelet
- Department of Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - I Klinge
- Dutch Society for Gender and Health
| | - V Lemmens
- Department of Research and Development, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands, Utrecht; Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Letsch
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charity CBF, Berlin; Charity Comprehensive Cancer Center CCCC, Berlin; Palliative Care Unit, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - M Moehler
- Department of Internal Medicine 1/Gastrointestinal Oncology, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Clinic, Mainz, Germany
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - B C Özdemir
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; International Cancer Prevention Institute, Epalinges, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stintzing S, Wirapati P, Lenz HJ, Neureiter D, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Kaiser F, Al-Batran S, Heintges T, Lerchenmüller C, Kahl C, Seipelt G, Kullmann F, Moehler M, Scheithauer W, Held S, Modest DP, Jung A, Kirchner T, Aderka D, Tejpar S, Heinemann V. Consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab in the FIRE3 (AIO KRK-0306) trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1796-1803. [PMID: 31868905 PMCID: PMC6927316 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND FIRE-3 compared first-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab in 592 KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The consensus molecular subgroups (CMS) are grouping CRC samples according to their gene-signature in four different subtypes. Relevance of CMS for the treatment of mCRC has yet to be defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this exploratory analysis, patients were grouped according to the previously published tumor CRC-CMSs. Objective response rates (ORR) were compared using chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimation, log-rank tests. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated according to the Cox proportional hazard method. RESULTS CMS classification could be determined in 438 out of 514 specimens available from the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 592). Frequencies for the remaining 438 samples were as follows: CMS1 (14%), CMS2 (37%), CMS3 (15%), CMS4 (34%). For the 315 RAS wild-type tumors, frequencies were as follows: CMS1 (12%), CMS2 (41%), CMS3 (11%), CMS4 (34%). CMS distribution in right- versus (vs) left-sided primary tumors was as follows: CMS1 (27% versus 11%), CMS2 (28% versus 45%), CMS3 (10% versus 12%), CMS4 (35% versus 32%). Independent of the treatment, CMS was a strong prognostic factor for ORR (P = 0.051), PFS (P < 0.001), and OS (P < 0.001). Within the RAS wild-type population, OS observed in CMS4 significantly favored FOLFIRI cetuximab over FOLFIRI bevacizumab. In CMS3, OS showed a trend in favor of the cetuximab arm, while OS was comparable in CMS1 and CMS2, independent of targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS CMS classification is prognostic for mCRC. Prolonged OS induced by FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the FIRE-3 study appears to be driven by CMS3 and CMS4. CMS classification provides deeper insights into the biology to CRC, but at present time has no direct impact on clinical decision-making.The FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study had been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00433927.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stintzing
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM), Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - P Wirapati
- SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatic Core Facility, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - H-J Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - T Decker
- Oncological Practice, Ravensburg
| | - A Kiani
- Medizinische Klinik IV, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth
| | | | - S Al-Batran
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/Main
| | - T Heintges
- Department of Medicine II, Städtisches Klinikum Neuss, Neuss
| | | | - C Kahl
- Haematology and Oncology, Staedtisches Klinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg
| | | | - F Kullmann
- Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden
| | - M Moehler
- University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - W Scheithauer
- Department of Internal Medicine I & Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - A Jung
- Institute of Pathology University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - T Kirchner
- Institute of Pathology University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D Aderka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - S Tejpar
- Molecular Digestive Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
De Gramont A, Henriques J, Baruch B, Kim T, Martinez-Villacampa M, Gallego-Plazas J, Cervantes A, Shim K, Jonker D, Guerin-Meyer V, Mineur L, Banzi M, Dewdney A, Dejthevaporn TS, Bloemendal H, Roth A, Thompson P, Moehler M, Aguilar EA, André T. Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (CC): Updated analysis of stage II disease from the AVANT phase III randomized trial by the GERCOR group. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
20
|
McNamara M, Lopes A, Wasan H, Malka D, Goldstein D, Shannon J, Okusaka T, Knox J, Wagner A, Andre T, Cunningham D, Moehler M, Jensen L, Koeberle D, Bekaii-Saab T, Bridgewater J, Valle J. Impact of anatomic site of biliary tract tumour origin and conditional probability of survival (CS): Results from 15 prospective advanced first-line clinical trial. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz247.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
21
|
Moehler M, Heo J, Lee HC, Tak WY, Chao Y, Paik SW, Yim HJ, Byun KS, Baron A, Ungerechts G, Jonker D, Ruo L, Cho M, Kaubisch A, Wege H, Merle P, Ebert O, Habersetzer F, Blanc JF, Rosmorduc O, Lencioni R, Patt R, Leen AM, Foerster F, Homerin M, Stojkowitz N, Lusky M, Limacher JM, Hennequi M, Gaspar N, McFadden B, De Silva N, Shen D, Pelusio A, Kirn DH, Breitbach CJ, Burke JM. Vaccinia-based oncolytic immunotherapy Pexastimogene Devacirepvec in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: a randomized multicenter Phase IIb trial (TRAVERSE). Oncoimmunology 2019; 8:1615817. [PMID: 31413923 PMCID: PMC6682346 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1615817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) is a vaccinia virus-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in and destroy tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity by expressing GM-CSF. An earlier randomized Phase IIa trial in predominantly sorafenib-naïve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit. This randomized, open-label Phase IIb trial investigated whether Pexa-Vec plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) improved OS over BSC alone in HCC patients who failed sorafenib therapy (TRAVERSE). 129 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone. Pexa-Vec was given as a single intravenous (IV) infusion followed by up to 5 IT injections. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and safety. A high drop-out rate in the control arm (63%) confounded assessment of response-based endpoints. Median OS (ITT) for Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone was 4.2 and 4.4 months, respectively (HR, 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78–1.80; p = .428). There was no difference between the two treatment arms in RR or TTP. Pexa-Vec was generally well-tolerated. The most frequent Grade 3 included pyrexia (8%) and hypotension (8%). Induction of immune responses to vaccinia antigens and HCC associated antigens were observed. Despite a tolerable safety profile and induction of T cell responses, Pexa-Vec did not improve OS as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure. The true potential of oncolytic viruses may lie in the treatment of patients with earlier disease stages which should be addressed in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01387555
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Moehler
- First Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Heo
- College of Medicine, Pusan National University and Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - H C Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic ofKorea
| | - W Y Tak
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Y Chao
- Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - S W Paik
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - H J Yim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan-si, Republic of Korea
| | - K S Byun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea UniversityCollege of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - A Baron
- Department of Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - G Ungerechts
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D Jonker
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - L Ruo
- Department of Surgery, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - M Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - A Kaubisch
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - H Wege
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P Merle
- Hepatology Unit, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - O Ebert
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany
| | - F Habersetzer
- Pôle Hépato-Digestif, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, INSERM 1110, IHU de Strasbourg and Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - J F Blanc
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - R Lencioni
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - R Patt
- Rad-MD, New York, NY, USA
| | - A M Leen
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - F Foerster
- First Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Homerin
- Medical Affairs, Transgene S.A., Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - N Stojkowitz
- Clinical Operations, Transgene S.A., 400 Bd Gonthier d'Andernach, Parc d'Innovation, 67405 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - M Lusky
- Program Management, Transgene S.A., 400 Bd Gonthier d'Andernach, Parc d'Innovation, 67405 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - J M Limacher
- Medical Affairs, Transgene S.A., 400 Bd Gonthier d'Andernach, Parc d'Innovation, 67405 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - M Hennequi
- Biostatistics, Transgene S.A., 400 Bd Gonthier d'Andernach, Parc d'Innovation, 67405 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - N Gaspar
- Clinical Assays, SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - B McFadden
- Analytical Development and Quality Control, SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - N De Silva
- Clinical, SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D Shen
- Clinical, SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A Pelusio
- Clinical, SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - D H Kirn
- SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - J M Burke
- Clinical, SillaJen Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Holch JW, Ricard I, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Heintges T, Kahl C, Kullmann F, Scheithauer W, Moehler M, Jelas I, Modest DP, Westphalen CB, von Einem JC, Michl M, Heinemann V. Relevance of baseline carcinoembryonic antigen for first-line treatment against metastatic colorectal cancer with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial). Eur J Cancer 2018; 106:115-125. [PMID: 30496943 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Increased baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum level is associated with inferior overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, limited data exist on its predictive relevance for targeted therapies. Therefore, we analysed its relevance in FIRE-3, a randomised phase III study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN FIRE-3 evaluated first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet) versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI/Bev) in mCRC patients with RAS-WT tumour (i.e. wild-type in KRAS and NRAS exons 2-4). Herein, the impact of CEA on patient outcome was investigated. RESULTS Of 400 patients, 356 (89.0%) were evaluable for CEA. High CEA (>10 ng/ml; N = 237) compared to low CEA (≤10 ng/ml; N = 119) was associated with shorter OS in the FOLFIRI/Bev arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50; P = 0.036), while no significant OS difference was observed in the FOLFIRI/Cet arm (HR = 1.07; P = 0.74). In patients with high CEA, FOLFIRI/Cet compared to FOLFIRI/Bev showed a greater OS benefit (HR = 0.56; P < 0.001) than in patients with low CEA (HR = 0.78; P = 0.30). Furthermore, FOLFIRI/Cet exhibited significantly superior objective response rate in patients with high CEA (odds ratio = 2.21; P = 0.006) in contrast to patients with low CEA (odds ratio = 0.90; P = 0.85). CONCLUSION In patients with RAS-WT mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI/Cet versus FOLFIRI/Bev, elevated CEA was associated with inferior survival in the bevacizumab arm, while this was not the case when cetuximab was applied. Comparison of OS and objective response rate according to treatment arms indicated that cetuximab was greatly superior to bevacizumab in patients with elevated CEA, while this effect was markedly lower and lost statistical significance in patients with low CEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Holch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - I Ricard
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - S Stintzing
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Fischer von Weikersthal
- Praxis für Onkologie/Haematologie, Gesundheitszentrum St. Marien GmbH, Mariahilfbergweg 7, 92224 Amberg, Germany
| | - T Decker
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Elisabethenstrasse 19, 88212 Ravensburg, Germany
| | - A Kiani
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Preuschwitzer Strasse 101, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
| | - U Vehling-Kaiser
- Hämato-onkologische Tagesklinik, Dr. Med. Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Ländgasse 132-135, 84028 Landshut, Germany
| | - T Heintges
- Department of Medicine II, Lukaskrankenhaus, Preußenstrasse 84, 41462 Neuss, Germany
| | - C Kahl
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Magdeburg gGmbH, Birkenallee 34, 39130 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - F Kullmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Söllnerstrasse 16, 92637 Weiden, Germany
| | - W Scheithauer
- Department of Internal Medicine I & CCC, Medical University Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - M Moehler
- University Medical Center Mainz, I. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - I Jelas
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C B Westphalen
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J C von Einem
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Michl
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Miller-Phillips L, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kaiser F, Al-Batran SE, Heintges T, Neureiter D, Kahl C, Kullmann F, Moehler M, Scheithauer W, Vazart C, Fontaine K, Held S, Modest D, Neumann J, Jung A, Kirchner T, Heinemann V, Stintzing S. Association of microRNA-21 (miR-21) with efficacy of cetuximab (cet) and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) within the FIRE-3 study (AIO KRK-0306). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy269.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
Moehler M, Maderer A, Thuss-Patience P, Brenner B, Hecker J, Muñoz FL, Meiler J, Ettrich T, Hofheinz R, Al-Batran S, Vogel A, Mueller L, Lutz M, Borchert K, Greil R, Alsina M, Karatas A, Van Cutsem E, Keller R, Larcher-Senn J, Lorenzen S. Cisplatin/5-fluorouracil +/- panitumumab for patients with non-resectable, advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer: A randomized phase III AIO/EORTC trial with an extensive biomarker program. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy149.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
25
|
Modest DP, Ricard I, Stintzing S, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, Heintges T, Kahl C, Seipelt G, Kullmann F, Scheithauer W, Moehler M, Westphalen CB, Holch JW, von Einem JC, Held S, Heinemann V. Evaluation of survival across several treatment lines in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of the FIRE-3 trial (AIO KRK0306). Eur J Cancer 2017; 84:262-269. [PMID: 28843184 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We explored the impacts of sequential application of various treatment lines on survival kinetics. Therefore, differences in overall survival (OS) observed in FIRE-3 were investigated in the context of time and exposure to applied treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS OS analyses (stratified by treatment with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab) were performed according to time intervals as well as using a Cox model to define changes of hazard ratio (HR) over time. RESULTS The fraction of patients with systemic treatment and time on treatment markedly decreases over treatment lines and time. OS evaluation by a Cox model indicated a trend towards a non-proportional hazard between treatment arms (P = 0.12/P = 0.09 for KRAS-intention-to-treat (ITT)/all-RAS wild-type populations, respectively). To improve the fit of the model, a change-point (point of curve separation) was estimated at 22.6 months (day 687) after randomisation. The HR between the two arms before 22.6 months was not significantly different from one. However, markedly different survival kinetics in favour of the cetuximab arm were apparent after the change-point (KRAS-ITT: P = 0.0018; HR, 0.60 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.83] and RAS: P = 0.0006; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35-0.75]). CONCLUSION The differences in OS favouring the cetuximab arm become apparent about 22.6 months after randomisation, indicating that only those patients who survive 22.6 months after randomisation benefit from the superiority of the cetuximab arm. When OS curves separate, only few patients receive active systemic treatment in short courses, suggesting that earlier treatment effects are responsible for later kinetics of survival curves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D P Modest
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - I Ricard
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Stintzing
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - T Decker
- Oncological Practice, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - A Kiani
- Medizinische Klinik IV, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | | | - S-E Al-Batran
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Nordwest Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - T Heintges
- Department of Medicine II, Städtisches Klinikum Neuss, Germany
| | - C Kahl
- Haematology and Oncology, Staedtisches Klinikum Magdeburg, Germany
| | - G Seipelt
- Oncological Practice, Bad Soden, Germany
| | - F Kullmann
- Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Germany
| | - W Scheithauer
- Department of Internal Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - M Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Department 1, Johannes-Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany; University Cancer Center Frankfurt/Mainz, Germany
| | - C B Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - J W Holch
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - J C von Einem
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Heinrich B, Klein J, Delic M, Goepfert K, Engel V, Geberzahn L, Lusky M, Erbs P, Preville X, Moehler M. Immunogenicity of oncolytic vaccinia viruses JX-GFP and TG6002 in a human melanoma in vitro model: studying immunogenic cell death, dendritic cell maturation and interaction with cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:2389-2401. [PMID: 28496337 PMCID: PMC5422459 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s126320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncolytic virotherapy is an emerging immunotherapeutic modality for cancer treatment. Oncolytic viruses with genetic modifications can further enhance the oncolytic effects on tumor cells and stimulate antitumor immunity. The oncolytic vaccinia viruses JX-594-GFP+/hGM-CSF (JX-GFP) and TG6002 are genetically modified by secreting granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or transforming 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) into 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). We compared their properties to kill tumor cells and induce an immunogenic type of cell death in a human melanoma cell model using SK29-MEL melanoma cells. Their influence on human immune cells, specifically regarding the activation of dendritic cells (DCs) and the interaction with the autologous cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clone, was investigated. Melanoma cells were infected with either JX-GFP or TG6002 alone or in combination with 5-FC and 5-FU. The influence of viral infection on cell viability followed a time- and multiplicity of infection dependent manner. Combination of virus treatment with 5-FU resulted in stronger reduction of cell viability. TG6002 in combination with 5-FC did not significantly strengthen the reduction of cell viability in this setting. Expression of calreticulin and high mobility group 1 protein (HMGB1), markers of immunogenic cell death (ICD), could be detected after viral infection. Accordingly, DC maturation was noted after viral oncolysis. DCs presented stronger expression of activation and maturation markers. The autologous CTL clone IVSB expressed the activation marker CD69, but viral treatment failed to enhance cytotoxicity marker. In summary, vaccinia viruses JX-GFP and TG6002 lyse melanoma cells and induce additional immunostimulatory effects to promote antitumor immune response. Further investigation in vivo is needed to consolidate the data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Heinrich
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Klein
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Delic
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - K Goepfert
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - V Engel
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - L Geberzahn
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Lusky
- Transgene SA, Illkirch-Graffenstaden
| | - P Erbs
- Transgene SA, Illkirch-Graffenstaden
| | | | - M Moehler
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stintzing S, Miller-Phillips L, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran SE, Heintges T, Kahl C, Seipelt G, Kullmann F, Stauch M, Scheithauer W, Held S, Moehler M, Jagenburg A, Kirchner T, Jung A, Heinemann V. Impact of BRAF and RAS mutations on first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab: analysis of the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study. Eur J Cancer 2017; 79:50-60. [PMID: 28463756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 03/18/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RAS and BRAF mutations have been identified as negative prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer. Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab in patients with RAS-mutant tumours needs to be further evaluated. Whether to treat patients with BRAF-mutant tumours with either bevacizumab or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies remains unclear. METHODS Patients treated within the FIRE-3 trial were retrospectively tested for BRAF and RAS mutations using formalin fixated paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumour material applying pyrosequencing for KRAS and NRAS exon 2, 3 and 4 mutations as far as for BRAF mutations. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier estimation and differences were expressed using the log-rank test. Overall response rate (ORR) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Data from a central independent radiological response evaluation were used to calculate early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR). RESULTS Overall, 188 patients with RAS-mutant tumours and 48 with BRAF-mutant tumours were identified. In BRAF-mutant patients, ORR was numerically higher in the cetuximab versus the bevacizumab arm (52% versus 40%), while comparable results were achieved for progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, p = 0.56) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.79, p = 0.45). RAS mutation was associated with a trend towards lower ORR (37% versus 50.5%, p = 0.11) and shorter PFS (7.4 versus 9.7 months; HR 1.25; p = 0.14) in patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab, but OS was comparable (19.1 versus 20.1 months; HR 1.05; p = 0.73), respectively. ETS identified subgroups sensitive to cetuximab-based treatment in both BRAF- (9/17) and RAS-mutant (18/48) patients and was associated with significantly longer OS. DpR was comparable between both treatment arms in RAS- and BRAF-mutant patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In BRAF- and RAS-mutant patients, cetuximab- and bevacizumab-based treatment had comparable survival times. ETS represents an early parameter associated with the benefit from anti-EGFR, while this was not the case with vascular endothelial growth factor A blockade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Stintzing
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - L Miller-Phillips
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | | | - T Decker
- Studienzentrum Onkologie Ravensburg, Elisabethenstraße 19, 88212, Ravensburg, Germany.
| | - A Kiani
- Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Preuschwitzer Straße 101, 95445, Bayreuth, Germany.
| | - U Vehling-Kaiser
- Praxis Hämatologie/Onkologie/Palliativmedizin - Tagesklinik, Ländgasse 132-135, 84028, Landshut, Germany.
| | - S-E Al-Batran
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Medizinische Klinik II/Onkologie, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - T Heintges
- Lukaskrankenhaus Neuss, Medizinische Klinik II, Preussenstr. 84, 41464, Neuss, Germany.
| | - C Kahl
- Städtisches Klinikum Magdeburg, Hämatologie/Onkologie, Birkenallee 34, 39130, Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - G Seipelt
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis und Tagesklinik, Kronbergerstraße 38, 65812, Bad Soden, Germany.
| | - F Kullmann
- Klinikum Weiden, Medizinische Klinik I, Söllnerstr. 16, 92637, Weiden, Germany.
| | - M Stauch
- Praxis für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Niederbronner Str. 2, 96317, Kronach, Germany.
| | - W Scheithauer
- Univ.-Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Klin. Abteilung für Onkologie, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
| | - S Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Birkenbergstraße 82, 51379 Leverkusen, Germany.
| | - M Moehler
- Johannes-Gutenberg Universität Mainz, 1. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, 55101, Mainz, Germany.
| | - A Jagenburg
- Radiology Consulting GmbH, Burscheider Str. 398A, 51381, Leverkusen, Germany.
| | - T Kirchner
- Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Thalkirchner Str. 37, 82036, Munich, Germany.
| | - A Jung
- Institute of Pathology, University of Munich, Thalkirchner Str. 37, 82036, Munich, Germany.
| | - V Heinemann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Baretton G, Dietel M, Gaiser T, Kirchner T, Kreipe HH, Quaas A, Röcken C, Rüschoff J, Tannapfel A, Lordick F, Al-Batran S, Hofheinz R, Lorenzen S, Moehler M, Thuss-Patience P. HER2-Testung beim Magenkarzinom. Pathologe 2016; 37:361-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s00292-016-0179-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
29
|
Lorenzen S, Arnold D, Fottner C, Leichsenring J, Moehler M, Seufferlein T, Vogel A, Weber MM, Reinacher-Schick A. [ASCO-update 2015 - highlights of the 51. meeting of the american society of clinical oncology/ASCO 2015]. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54:167-72. [PMID: 26854837 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The field of gastrointestinal oncology is rapidly developing, on the one hand through the identification of novel molecular targets and therapeutic principles, on the other hand through the establishment and improvement of multidisciplinary treatment strategies. The following manuscript summarizes the most important trial results of the ASCO Meeting 2015 for gastrointestinal cancers. Besides trials on perioperative treatment of esophageal-, pancreatic- and colon cancer, we will present impressive data on new therapeutic strategies such as immunotherapy in gastric-, liver and microsatellite instable colorectal cancer. The trials will be put into context by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lorenzen
- Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - D Arnold
- Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C Fottner
- Abteilung für Endokrinologie und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Leichsenring
- Abteilung für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Med. Klinik I, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
| | - M Moehler
- I. Dept Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital of Mainz, Germany
| | - T Seufferlein
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Germany
| | - A Vogel
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, MH-Hannover, Germany
| | - M M Weber
- Abteilung für Endokrinologie und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - A Reinacher-Schick
- Abteilung für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Med. Klinik I, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bridgewater J, Lopes A, Wasan H, Malka D, Jensen L, Okusaka T, Knox J, Wagner D, Cunningham D, Shannon J, Goldstein D, Moehler M, Bekaii-Saab T, McNamara M, Valle J. Prognostic factors for progression-free and overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:134-140. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
31
|
Al-Batran S, Kroening H, Hannig C, Hamm T, Moorahrend E, Petersen V, Eggers E, Hempel D, Zielke K, Thuss-Patience P, Moehler M, Hegewisch-Becker S. 2333 Trastuzumab in combination with different first-line chemotherapies for treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastro- oesophageal junction cancer: Updated findings from the German non-interventional study HerMES. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31249-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
32
|
Moehler M, Ehrlich A, Ruckes C, Thomaidis T, Weinmann A, Galle P, Woerns M. 2322 Safety and efficacy of Afatinib with Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in chemo-naïve patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer: An open-label, uncontrolled phase Ib trial. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31238-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
33
|
Moehler M, Melichar B, Obermannova R, Weinmann A, Scigalla P, Kubala E, Mahlberg R, Heinemann V, Tesarova M, Janda P, Biville F, Mansoor W. P-066 S-1 in combination with epirubicin and oxaliplatin (EOS) in Caucasian patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (AGC): Results of a phase I study. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv233.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
34
|
Rey JW, Deris N, Marquardt JU, Thomaidis T, Moehler M, Kittner JM, Nguyen-Tat M, Dümcke S, Tresch A, Biesterfeld S, Goetz M, Mudter J, Neurath MF, Galle PR, Kiesslich R, Hoffman A. High-definition endoscopy with iScan and Lugol's solution for the detection of inflammation in patients with nonerosive reflux disease: histologic evaluation in comparison with a control group. Dis Esophagus 2014; 29:185-91. [PMID: 25515856 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is commonly diagnosed in patients with symptoms of reflux. The aim of the present study was to determine whether high-definition endoscopy (HD) plus equipped with the iScan function or chromoendoscopy with Lugol's solution might permit the differentiation of NERD patients from those without reflux symptoms, proven by targeted biopsies of endoscopic lesions. A total of 100 patients without regular intake of proton pump inhibitors and with a normal conventional upper endoscopy were prospectively divided into NERD patients and controls. A second upper endoscopy was performed using HD+ with additional iScan function and then Lugol's solution was applied. Biopsy specimens were taken from the gastroesophageal junction in all patients. A total of 65 patients with reflux symptoms and 27 controls were included. HD(+) endoscopy with iScan revealed subtle mucosal breaks in 52 patients; the subsequent biopsies confirmed esophagitis in all cases. After Lugol's solution, 58 patients showed mucosal breaks. Sensitivity for the iScan procedure was 82.5%, whereas that for Lugol's solution was 92.06%. Excellent positive predictive values of 100% and 98.3%, respectively, were noted. The present study suggests that the majority of patients with NERD and typical symptoms of reflux disease can be identified by iScan or Lugol's chromoendoscopy as minimal erosive reflux disease (ERD) patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Rey
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, HSK Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - N Deris
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - J U Marquardt
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Thomaidis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Moehler
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - J M Kittner
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Nguyen-Tat
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - S Dümcke
- Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - A Tresch
- Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Biesterfeld
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Goetz
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.,First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J Mudter
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M F Neurath
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - P R Galle
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - R Kiesslich
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, HSK Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - A Hoffman
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine II, HSK Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Moehler M, Maderer A, Schimanski C, Kanzler S, Denzer U, Kolligs FT, Ebert MP, Distelrath A, Geissler M, Trojan J, Schütz M, Berie L, Sauvigny C, Lammert F, Lohse A, Dollinger MM, Lindig U, Duerr EM, Lubomierski N, Zimmermann S, Wachtlin D, Kaiser AK, Schadmand-Fischer S, Galle PR, Woerns M. Gemcitabine plus sorafenib versus gemcitabine alone in advanced biliary tract cancer: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II AIO study with biomarker and serum programme. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:3125-35. [PMID: 25446376 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Revised: 09/13/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since sorafenib has shown activity in different tumour types and gemcitabine regimens improved the outcome for biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients, we evaluated first-line gemcitabine plus sorafenib in a double-blind phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS 102 unresectable or metastatic BTC patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of gallbladder or intrahepatic bile ducts, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2 were randomised to gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly, first 7-weeks+1-week rest followed by once 3-weeks+1-week rest) plus sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumour samples were prospectively stained for sorafenib targets and potential biomarkers. Serum samples (first two cycles) were measured for vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1)α by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS Gemcitabine plus sorafenib was generally well tolerated. Four and three patients achieved partial responses in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. There was no difference in the primary end-point, median progression-free survival (PFS) for gemcitabine plus sorafenib versus gemcitabine plus placebo (3.0 versus 4.9 months, P=0.859), and no difference for median overall survival (OS) (8.4 versus 11.2 months, P=0.775). Patients with liver metastasis after resection of primary BTC survived longer with sorafenib (P=0.019) compared to placebo. Patients who developed hand-foot syndrome (HFS) showed longer PFS and OS than patients without HFS. Two sorafenib targets, VEGFR-2 and c-kit, were not expressed in BTC samples. VEGFR-3 and Hif1α were associated with lymph node metastases and T stage. Absence of PDGFRβ expression correlated with longer PFS. CONCLUSION The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine did not demonstrate improved efficacy in advanced BTC patients. Biomarker subgroup analysis suggested that some patients might benefit from combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Moehler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - A Maderer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - C Schimanski
- Department of Internal Medicine, Marienhospital Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - S Kanzler
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Leopoldina Hospital, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - U Denzer
- 1st Department of Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - F T Kolligs
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M P Ebert
- 2nd Department of Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - A Distelrath
- Tumor Department, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
| | - M Geissler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - J Trojan
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Schütz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - L Berie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - C Sauvigny
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - F Lammert
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Homburg, Homburg, Germany
| | - A Lohse
- 1st Department of Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M M Dollinger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - U Lindig
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - E M Duerr
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N Lubomierski
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Zimmermann
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Homburg, Homburg, Germany
| | - D Wachtlin
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials of the University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - A-K Kaiser
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials of the University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - S Schadmand-Fischer
- Department of Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - P R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Woerns
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
André T, De Gramont A, Chibaudel B, Raballand A, Duval A, Hickish T, Tabernero J, van Laethem J, Banzi M, Maartense E, Shani A, Carlsson G, Scheithauer W, Papamichael D, Moehler M, Landolfi S, Demetter P, Dumont S, Fléjou J, De Gramont A. Mosaic Study: Actualization of Overall Survival (Os) with 10 Years Follow Up and Evaluation of Braf. By Gercor and Mosaic Investigators. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu333.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
37
|
Al-Batran S, Kroening H, Hannig C, Hamm T, Moorahrend E, Petersen V, Eggers E, Hempel D, Zielke K, Wohlfarth T, Thuss-Patience P, Moehler M, Hegewisch-Becker S. Trastuzumab in Combination with Different First-Line Chemotherapies for Treatment of Her2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Updated Findings from the German Non-Interventional Study Hermes. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu334.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
38
|
Stintzing S, Modest D, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran S, Heintges T, Lerchenmueller C, Kahl C, Seipelt G, Kullmann F, Scheithauer W, Held S, Giessen C, Moehler M, Jagenburg A, Jung A, Kirchner T, Heinemann V. Independent Radiological Evaluation of Objective Response, Early Tumor Shrinkage, and Depth of Response in Fire-3 (Aio Krk-0306) in the Final Ras Evaluable Population. Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu438.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
39
|
Moehler M. How to Develop Molecular Targeted Drugs in Gastric Cancer: First or Second Line? Ann Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt444.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
40
|
Wimberger P, Gilet H, Gonschior AK, Heiss MM, Moehler M, Oskay-Oezcelik G, Al-Batran SE, Schmalfeldt B, Schmittel A, Schulze E, Parsons SL. Deterioration in quality of life (QoL) in patients with malignant ascites: results from a phase II/III study comparing paracentesis plus catumaxomab with paracentesis alone. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:1979-1985. [PMID: 22734013 PMCID: PMC3403730 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2012] [Revised: 04/17/2012] [Accepted: 04/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant ascites (MA) is associated with poor prognosis and limited palliative therapeutic options. Therefore, quality of life (QoL) assessment is of particular importance to demonstrate new treatment value. Following the demonstration of the superiority of catumaxomab and paracentesis over paracentesis on puncture-free survival, this analysis aimed at comparing deterioration in QoL between both the treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a randomised, multicentre, phase II/III study of patients with MA due to epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) positive cancer, the QoL was evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 items (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at screening, 1, 3 and 7 months after treatment and in the case of re-puncture on the day of paracentesis. Time to first deterioration in QoL was defined as a decrease in the QoL score of at least five points and compared between the catumaxomab (n=160) and control (n=85) groups using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline score, country and primary tumour type. RESULTS Deterioration in QoL scores appeared more rapidly in the control than in the catumaxomab group (median 19-26 days versus 47-49 days). The difference in time to deterioration in QoL between the groups was statistically significant for all scores (P<0.01). The hazard ratios ranged from 0.08 to 0.24 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with catumaxomab delayed deterioration in QoL in patients with MA. Compared with paracentesis alone, catumaxomab enabled patients to benefit from better QoL for a prolonged survival period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Wimberger
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics Clinic, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - H Gilet
- Mapi Consultancy, Lyon, France.
| | - A-K Gonschior
- Pricing, Reimbursement and Market Access, Fresenius Biotech GmbH, München
| | - M M Heiss
- Department of Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Köln
| | - M Moehler
- 1st Medical Clinic and Policlinic, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz
| | - G Oskay-Oezcelik
- Quality of Life Working Group of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin
| | - S-E Al-Batran
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt
| | - B Schmalfeldt
- Department for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, München
| | - A Schmittel
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin
| | - E Schulze
- Medical Affairs, Fresenius Biotech GmbH, München, Germany
| | - S L Parsons
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schmalfeldt B, Seck K, Gonschior AK, Gilet H, Heiss M, Hennig M, Moehler M, Schulze E, Wimberger P, Parsons SL. Quality of life in patients with malignant ascites and after treatment with catumaxomab: results from a phase II/III study comparing paracentesis plus catumaxomab with paracentesis alone. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
|
42
|
Grenacher L, Schwarz M, Lordick F, Krause B, Roecken C, Moenig S, Ebert M, Jenssen C, Kauczor HU, Moehler M. [S3 guideline - diagnosis and treatment of gastric carcinoma: relevance for radiologic imaging]. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2012; 184:706-12. [PMID: 22434371 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The new German S3 guideline regarding stomach cancer includes a variety of innovations with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and the esophagogastric junction. The guideline has been strongly supported by the "oncology" guidelines program consisting of the "Deutsche Krebshilfe" and the German Cancer Society and the AWMF (Dr. M. Follmann). This guideline contains evidence-based treatment recommendations and quality indicators for guideline implementation and evaluation in order to improve broad medical care and to facilitate development and subsequent adjustment. The purpose of this article is to introduce the innovations with regard to radiological diagnosis and to discuss the latest literature on the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Grenacher
- Abt. Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Harder J, Ihorst G, Heinemann V, Hofheinz R, Moehler M, Buechler P, Kloeppel G, Röcken C, Bitzer M, Boeck S, Endlicher E, Reinacher-Schick A, Schmoor C, Geissler M. Multicentre phase II trial of trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with HER2 overexpressing metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 106:1033-8. [PMID: 22374460 PMCID: PMC3304403 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: New therapeutic options for metastatic pancreatic cancer are urgently needed. In pancreatic cancer, overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has been reported in up to 45%. This multicentre phase II study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the HER2 antibody trastuzumab combined with capecitabine in the patients with pancreatic cancer and HER2 overexpression. Methods: Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after 12 weeks. A total of 212 patients were screened for HER2 expression. Results: Immunohistochemical (IHC) HER2 expression was: 83 (40%) grade 0, 71 (34%) grade 1, 31 (15%) grade 2, 22 (11%) grade 3. A total of 17 patients with IHC +3 HER2 expression or gene amplification could be assessed for the treatment response. Grade 3/4 treatment toxicities were: each 7% leucopenia, diarrhoea, nausea and hand-foot syndrome. Progression-free survival after 12 weeks was 23.5%, median overall survival (OS) 6.9 months. Conclusion: This study demonstrates +3 HER2 expression or gene amplification in 11% of patients. Contrary to breast and gastric cancer, only 7 out of 11 (64%) patients with IHC +3 HER2 expression showed gene amplification. Although the therapy was well tolerated, PFS and OS did not perform favourably compared with standard chemotherapy. Together, we do not recommend further evaluation of anti-HER2 treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Harder
- Medizinische Klinik II, Hegau- Bodensee Klinikum, Virchowstraße 10, D-78224 Singen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Moehler M, Schwarz S, Wagner AD. Esophagogastric cancer: integration of targeted therapies into systemic chemotherapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2011; 11:681-7. [PMID: 21651462 DOI: 10.2174/156800911796191006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2011] [Accepted: 05/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Although combination chemotherapy has been shown to be more effective than single agents in advanced esophagogastric cancer, the better response rates have not fulfilled their promise as overall survival times from best combination still range between 8 to 11 months. So far, the development of targeted therapies stays somewhat behind their integration into treatment concepts compared to other gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, the review summarizes the recent advances in the development of targeted therapies in advanced esophagogastric cancer. The majority of agents tested were angiogenesis inhibitors or agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptors EGFR1 and HER2. For trastuzumab and bevacizumab, phase III trial results have been presented recently. While addition of trastuzumab to cisplatin/5-fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy results in a clinically relevant and statistically significant survival benefit in HER 2+ patients, the benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was not significant. Thus, all patients with metastatic disease should be tested for HER-2 status in the tumor. Trastuzumab in combination with cisplatin/5-fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy is the new standard of care for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Moehler
- Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, First Department of Internal Medicine, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55116 Mainz, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gonschior A, Gilet H, Heiss M, Hennig M, Moehler M, Schmalfeldt B, Schulze E, Wimberger P, Parsons S. 3004 POSTER DISCUSSION Quality of Life in Patients With Malignant Ascites and Ascites Symptoms After Treatment With Catumaxomab: Results From a Multicenter Phase ll/lll Study Comparing Paracentesis Plus Catumaxomab With Paracentesis Alone. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71077-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
46
|
Moehler M, Plutizki S, Khillimberger K, Galle P, Dannhardt G, Mueller A. 1235 POSTER Moguntinones – New Selective Inhibitors for Treating Human Gastrointestinal Tumours. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)70847-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
47
|
Moehler M, Al-Batran SE, Andus T, Anthuber M, Arends J, Arnold D, Aust D, Baier P, Baretton G, Bernhardt J, Boeing H, Böhle E, Bokemeyer C, Bornschein J, Budach W, Burmester E, Caca K, Diemer WA, Dietrich CF, Ebert M, Eickhoff A, Ell C, Fahlke J, Feussner H, Fietkau R, Fischbach W, Fleig W, Flentje M, Gabbert HE, Galle PR, Geissler M, Gockel I, Graeven U, Grenacher L, Gross S, Hartmann JT, Heike M, Heinemann V, Herbst B, Herrmann T, Höcht S, Hofheinz RD, Höfler H, Höhler T, Hölscher AH, Horneber M, Hübner J, Izbicki JR, Jakobs R, Jenssen C, Kanzler S, Keller M, Kiesslich R, Klautke G, Körber J, Krause BJ, Kuhn C, Kullmann F, Lang H, Link H, Lordick F, Ludwig K, Lutz M, Mahlberg R, Malfertheiner P, Merkel S, Messmann H, Meyer HJ, Mönig S, Piso P, Pistorius S, Porschen R, Rabenstein T, Reichardt P, Ridwelski K, Röcken C, Roetzer I, Rohr P, Schepp W, Schlag PM, Schmid RM, Schmidberger H, Schmiegel WH, Schmoll HJ, Schuch G, Schuhmacher C, Schütte K, Schwenk W, Selgrad M, Sendler A, Seraphin J, Seufferlein T, Stahl M, Stein H, Stoll C, Stuschke M, Tannapfel A, Tholen R, Thuss-Patience P, Treml K, Vanhoefer U, Vieth M, Vogelsang H, Wagner D, Wedding U, Weimann A, Wilke H, Wittekind C. [German S3-guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric cancer"]. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49:461-531. [PMID: 21476183 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Moehler
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55101 Mainz.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Moehler M, Voigt J, Kastor M, Heil M, Sengespeick C, Biesterfeld S, Dippold W, Kanzler S, Galle P. Endosonographie mit Feinnadelpunktion in der Primärdiagnostik unklarer Raumforderungen im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2011; 136:303-8. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
49
|
Moehler M, Mueller A, Trarbach T, Lordick F, Seufferlein T, Kubicka S, Geißler M, Schwarz S, Galle PR, Kanzler S. Cetuximab with irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in advanced gastroesophageal cancer: a prospective multi-center biomarker-oriented phase II study. Ann Oncol 2010; 22:1358-1366. [PMID: 21119032 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cetuximab plus irinotecan/folinic acid/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (IF) was evaluated as first-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction tumors. Preplanned analyses of the influence of tumor biomarkers on treatment outcome were carried out. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) on day 1, subsequently 250 mg/m(2)) plus irinotecan (80 mg/m(2)) and a 24-hour continuous infusion of folinic acid (200 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU (1500 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 of a 50-day cycle, until progressive disease (PD). RESULTS The most common grade 3/4 toxic effects in 49 patients were diarrhea (15%) and skin toxic effects (14%). In 48 assessable patients, the overall response rate was 46% and disease control rate was 79%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1-15.6] and 16.5 months (95% CI 11.7-30.1), respectively. Tumor response was more common than nonresponse in epidermal growth factor receptor-expressing tumors (P = 0.041). Tumor PTEN expression was associated with longer PFS (P = 0.035) and OS (P = 0.0127) than no PTEN expression. CONCLUSION Cetuximab plus IF was well tolerated and efficacy data were encouraging. This treatment combination and the role of selected biomarkers are under investigation in the ongoing phase III EXPAND trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Moehler
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz.
| | - A Mueller
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz
| | - T Trarbach
- Department of Medicine (Cancer Research), West German Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Essen, Essen
| | - F Lordick
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - T Seufferlein
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Halle, Halle
| | - S Kubicka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center of Internal Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
| | - M Geißler
- Department of Internal Medicine, City Hospital of Esslingen, Esslingen
| | - S Schwarz
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz
| | - P R Galle
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz
| | - S Kanzler
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz; Second Department of Medicine, Schweinfurt Hospital, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lordick F, Grenacher L, Röcken C, Ebert M, Moehler M, Schumacher G. [Diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2010; 135:1671-82; quiz 1683-6. [PMID: 20721843 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
From a global perspective, gastric cancer including cancer of the esophago-gastric junction is the fourth most common malignant tumor and the second-most common cause of cancer-related death. Due to the lack of screening programs in Western countries, most gastric cancers are diagnosed in advanced stages. A sophisticated staging should include high-resolution computed tomography of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis and video-documented endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound. In mucosal gastric cancer, endoscopic resection can replace surgical resection if specific criteria are present. In the stages II and III perioperative chemotherapy has been established as a standard of care and should be applied. In the metastatic setting, treatment goals are palliative. Chemotherapy can prolong survival, improve symptoms and can help to maintain a better quality of life. Combination chemotherapy including a platinum compound and a fluoropyrimidine regarded as standard. About 20 % of gastric cancers exhibit overexpression of the growth factor receptor family member Her2. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against Her2 and has shown to prolong survival when combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Lordick
- Medizinische Klinik III (Hämatologie und Onkologie), Klinikum Braunschweig und Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|