Excess gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hiatus hernia is caused by mechanisms other than transient LES relaxations

Impact of hiatal hernia on pediatric dyspeptic symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Hiatal hernia (HH) affects from 10% to 50% of adult population. The correlation between HH, gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspeptic symptoms, and esophagitis has long been known in adults. The primary objective of our prospective observational study was to estimate the prevalence of HH in children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), irrespective of their symptoms.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 111 consecutive children (48 boys and 63 girls; mean age 94.9 ± 52.3 months) referred for EGD. In all of the patients a symptomatic score assessment based on the Rome III criteria was used to measure frequency, severity, and duration of gastrointestinal symptoms. HH presence was endoscopically defined; esophagitis presence was evaluated either endoscopically and histologically. Children were divided in 2 age-range groups: <48 months (group 1) and >48 months (group 2).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients of 111 (20.7%) had evidence of a sliding HH at EGD. In children from group 2, we found a statistically significant association of HH with heartburn (P = 0.03, 95% confidence interval 1-9.3, r = 0.1) and regurgitation (P = 0.003, 95% confidence interval 1.7-20.4, r = 0.3). Regarding esophagitis presence, no association was found at any age either with defined esophagitis or with dilated intercellular spaces.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of HH in our study population was 20.7%. According to our data, HH correlates with the presence of heartburn and regurgitation in children, but not in toddlers. No association was found with esophagitis at any age.

Gaviscon Double Action Liquid (antacid & alginate) is more effective than antacid in controlling post-prandial oesophageal acid exposure in GERD patients: a double-blind crossover study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that Gaviscon Double Action Liquid (a combination alginate-antacid) administered post-prandially co-localises with the acid pocket, the 'reservoir' for post-prandial acid reflux.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of Gaviscon Double Action Liquid to an equivalent strength antacid without alginate in controlling post-prandial acid reflux in GERD patients.

METHODS

Fourteen GERD patients undertook two 3.5-h high-resolution manometry/pH-impedance studies during which they ate a standardised meal. In a double-blinded randomised crossover design they then took Gaviscon or CVS brand antacid, each with ~18 mmol/L acid neutralising capacity. The primary outcome was distal oesophageal acid exposure; secondary outcomes were number of reflux events, proximal extent of reflux, nadir pH of the refluxate, mechanism of reflux and reflux symptoms scored with a validated instrument.

RESULTS

Ten patients completed the study. Gaviscon studies had significantly less distal oesophageal acid exposure and greater nadir refluxate pH in the 30-150 min post-prandial period than antacid studies. There were no differences in the number of reflux events (acid or weakly acidic) or the number of proximal reflux events (15-17 cm above the LES) with either study medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Gaviscon Double Action Liquid is more effective than an antacid without alginate in controlling post-prandial oesophageal acid exposure. However, the number and spatial distribution of reflux events within the oesophagus are similar. This suggests that Gaviscon main effectiveness relates to its co-localisation with and displacement/neutralisation of the post-prandial acid pocket, rather than preventing reflux.

Dysmotility and reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, with the advent of new oesophageal testing [i.e. 24-h impedance-pH monitoring, combined impedance-manometry, high-resolution manometry (HRM)], relevant progress in understanding the mechanisms contributing to the development of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has been made, allowing a better management of patients with this disorder. The aim of our review is to report the state-of-the-art about oesophageal motor disorders in patients with reflux disease and to stimulate new research in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS), transient LOS relaxations, impairment of oesophagogastric junction including hiatal hernia, oesophageal bolus transit abnormalities and presence of ineffective oesophageal motility have been strongly implicated in GORD development. In particular, the majority of recent studies carried out with HRM and impedance-pH testing reported that these motor abnormalities are increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of GORD, from nonerosive reflux disease and erosive oesophagitis to Barrett's oesophagus.

SUMMARY

Defining and characterizing oesophageal dysmotility in patients with reflux disease is of maximum importance in order to properly diagnose these patients and to treat them with the best management of care. New studies are needed in order to better understand the physiomechanic basis of oesophageal dysmotility in GORD patients.

Symptomatic reflux disease: the present, the past and the future

The worldwide incidence of GORD and its complications is increasing along with the exponentially increasing problem of obesity. Of particular concern is the relationship between central adiposity and GORD complications, including oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Driven by progressive insight into the epidemiology and pathophysiology of GORD, the earlier belief that increased gastroesophageal reflux mainly results from one dominant mechanism has been replaced by acceptance that GORD is multifactorial. Instigating factors, such as obesity, age, genetics, pregnancy and trauma may all contribute to mechanical impairment of the oesophagogastric junction resulting in pathological reflux and accompanying syndromes. Progression of the disease by exacerbating and perpetuating factors such as obesity, neuromuscular dysfunction and oesophageal fibrosis ultimately lead to development of an overt hiatal hernia. The latter is now accepted as a central player, impacting on most mechanisms underlying gastroesophageal reflux (low sphincter pressure, transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation, oesophageal clearance and acid pocket position), explaining its association with more severe disease and mucosal damage. Since the introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), clinical management of GORD has markedly changed, shifting the therapeutic challenge from mucosal healing to reduction of PPI-resistant symptoms. In parallel, it became clear that reflux symptoms may result from weakly acidic or non-acid reflux, insight that has triggered the search for new compounds or minimally invasive procedures to reduce all types of reflux. In summary, our view on GORD has evolved enormously compared to that of the past, and without doubt will impact on how to deal with GORD in the future.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common digestive diseases in the Western world, with typical symptoms, such as heartburn, regurgitation, or retrosternal pain, reported by 15% to 20% of the general population. The pathophysiology of GERD is multifactorial. Our understanding of these factors has significantly improved in recent years, with increased understanding of the acid pocket and hiatal hernia and how these factors interact. Although our insight has significantly increased over the past years, more studies are required to better understand symptom generation in GERD, especially in patients with therapy-resistant symptoms.

An alginate-antacid formulation localizes to the acid pocket to reduce acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Alginate rafts (polysaccharide polymers that precipitate into a low-density viscous gel when they contact gastric acid) have been reported to form at the acid pocket, an unbuffered pool of acid that floats on top of ingested food and causes postprandial acid reflux. We studied the location of an alginate formulation in relation to the acid pocket and the corresponding effects on reflux parameters and acid pocket positioning in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with symptomatic GERD and large hiatal hernias to groups who were given either (111)In-labeled alginate-antacid (n = 8, Gaviscon Double Action Liquid) or antacid (n = 8, Antagel) after a standard meal. The relative positions of labeled alginate and acid pocket were analyzed for 2 hours by using scintigraphy; reflux episodes were detected by using high-resolution manometry and pH-impedance monitoring.

RESULTS

The alginate-antacid label localized to the acid pocket. The number of acid reflux episodes was significantly reduced in patients receiving alginate-antacid (3.5; range, 0-6.5; P = .03) compared with those receiving antacid (15; range, 5-20), whereas time to acid reflux was significantly increased in patients receiving alginate-antacid (63 minutes; range, 23-92) vs those receiving antacid (14 minutes; range, 9-23; P = .01). The acid pocket was located below the diaphragm in 71% of patients given alginate-antacid vs 21% of those given antacid (P = .08). There was an inverse correlation between a subdiaphragm position of the acid pocket and acid reflux (r = -0.76, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a study of 16 patients with GERD, we observed that the alginate-antacid raft localizes to the postprandial acid pocket and displaces it below the diaphragm to reduce postprandial acid reflux. These findings indicate the importance of the acid pocket in GERD pathogenesis and establish alginate-antacid as an appropriate therapy for postprandial acid reflux.

Effect of transoral incisionless fundoplication on reflux mechanisms

OBJECTIVES

Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) is a new endoscopic treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mechanisms underlying the anti-reflux effect of this new procedure have not been studied. We therefore conducted this explorative study to evaluate the effect of TIF on reflux mechanisms, focusing on transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility.

METHODS

GERD patients (N = 15; 11 males, mean age 41 years, range 23-66), dissatisfied with medical treatment were studied before and 6 months after TIF. We performed 90-min postprandial combined high-resolution manometry and impedance-pH monitoring and an ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. EGJ distensibility was evaluated using an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe before and directly after the procedure.

RESULTS

TIF reduced the number of postprandial TLESRs (16.8 ± 1.5 vs. 9.2 ± 1.3; p < 0.01) and the number of postprandial TLESRs associated with reflux (11.1 ± 1.6 vs. 5.6 ± 0.6; p < 0.01), but the proportion of TLESRs associated with reflux was unaltered (67.6 ± 6.9 vs. 69.9 ± 6.3 %). TIF also led to a decrease in the number and proximal extent of reflux episodes and an improvement of acid exposure in the upright position; conversely, TIF had no effect on the number of gas reflux episodes. EGJ distensibility was reduced after the procedure (2.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2 mm(2)/mmHg; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TIF reduced the number of postprandial TLESRs, the number of TLESRs associated with reflux and EGJ distensibility. This resulted in a reduction of the number and proximal extent of reflux episodes and improvement of acid exposure in the upright position. The anti-reflux effect of TIF showed to be selective for liquid-containing reflux only, thereby preserving the ability of venting gastric air.

Pathophysiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a role for mucosa integrity?

BACKGROUND

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very prevalent and has a high burden on health security system costs. Nevertheless, pathophysiology is complex and not well-understood. Several mechanisms have been proposed: decreased salivation, impaired esophageal clearance, decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure resting tone, presence of hiatal hernia, increased number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), increased acid, and pepsin secretion, pyloric incompetence provoking duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux of bile acids and trypsin. Independent of the relevance of each mechanism, the ultimate phenomenon is that mucosal epithelium is exposed for a longer time to agents as acid and pepsin or is in contact to luminal agents not commonly present in gastric refluxate as trypsin or bile acids. This leads to a visible damage of the epithelium (erosive esophagitis -EE) or impairing mucosal integrity without any sign of macroscopic alteration as occurs in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Luminal factors are not the only responsible for such impairment; more recent data indicate that endogenous factors may also play a role.

PURPOSE

This review will update the most recent findings on the putative pathophysiological mechanisms and specially will focus on the role of esophageal mucosal integrity in GERD. Methodologies used for the evaluation of mucosal integrity, its relevance in EE and NERD, its involvement in symptoms perception and the effect of luminal and endogenous factors will be discussed.

A study of pathophysiological factors associated with gastro-esophageal reflux disease in twins discordant for gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms

BACKGROUND

Differences in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and peristaltic function and in transient LES relaxations (TLESR) have been described in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, some of these differences may be the result of chronic GERD rather than being an underlying contributory factor.

METHODS

Twins discordant for GERD symptoms, i.e., only one twin had GERD symptoms, underwent standard LES and esophageal body manometry, and then using a sleeve sensor prolonged LES and pH monitoring, 30 min before and 60 min after a 250 mL 1200 kcal lipid meal.

KEY RESULTS

Eight monozygotic and 24 dizygotic female twins were studied. Although there was no difference in preprandial LES pressure (symptomatic 13.2 ± 7.1 mmHg vs asymptomatic 15.1 ± 6.2 mmHg, P = 0.4), LES pressure fell further postprandially in symptomatic twins (LES pressure area under the curve 465 ± 126 vs 331 ± 141 mmHg h, P < 0.01). 12/37 (32%) of acid reflux episodes in symptomatic twins occurred due to low LES pressure or deep inspiration/strain and 0/17 in asymptomatic twins (P = 0.01). There was no difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic twins in: peristaltic amplitude, ineffective esophageal body motility, hiatus hernia prevalence, or LES length. There was also no difference in TLESR frequency preprandially (symptomatic median 1(range 0-2) vs asymptomatic 0(0-2), P = 0.08) or postprandially (2.5(1-8) vs 3(1-6), P = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Twins with GERD symptoms had lower postprandial LES pressure and given the close genetic link between the twins, it is possible that such differences are caused by GERD. Acid reflux episodes associated with a hypotensive LES were seen in symptomatic, but not in asymptomatic twins.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The gastroesophageal junction is structurally complex and functionally designed to ensure the acid secreted by the most proximal gastric mucosa flows towards the stomach and not up onto the oesophageal squamous mucosa. The pattern and mechanism of reflux vary with the severity of reflux disease and this probably represents different ends of a spectrum rather than distinct pathophysiological mechanisms. Nearly all patients with severe reflux disease have hiatus hernia, however, a substantial proportion of patients with mild reflux disease do not, and this may be a result of intermittent or partial hiatus hernia undetectable by current available tools. The acid pocket is an area of post-prandial unbuffered gastric acidity immediately distal to the gastroesophageal junction and which is enlarged in patients with hiatus hernia. The acid pocket provides a reservoir of acid available to reflux when the intrinsic sphincter fails. Central obesity is an important factor in the aetiology of reflux and does this by the increased abdomino-thoracic pressure gradient inducing hiatus hernia and increasing the rate of flow of reflux when sphincter opens. Central obesity also induces short segment intrasphincteric reflux and thereby columnar metaplasia of the most distal oesophagus.

The oesophagus and cough: laryngo-pharyngeal reflux, microaspiration and vagal reflexes

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is generally considered to be one of the commonest causes of chronic cough, however randomised controlled trials of proton pump inhibitors have often failed to support this notion. This article reviews the most recent studies investigating the mechanisms thought to link reflux and cough, namely laryngo-pharyngeal reflux, micro-aspiration and neuronal cross-organ sensitisation. How recent evidence might shed light on the failure of acid suppressing therapies and suggest new approaches to treating reflux related cough are also discussed.

Oesophageal mucosal intercellular space diameter and reflux pattern in childhood erosive and non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We sought to compare intercellular space diameter in children with non-erosive and erosive reflux disease, and a control group. We also aimed to characterize the reflux pattern in erosive and non-erosive reflux disease patients, and to explore the relationship between intercellular space diameter values and reflux parameters.

METHODS

Twenty-four children with non-erosive reflux disease, 20 with erosive reflux disease, and 10 controls were prospectively studied. All patients and controls underwent upper endoscopy. Biopsies were taken at 2-3 cm above the Z-line, and intercellular space diameter was measured using transmission electron microscopy. Non-erosive and erosive reflux disease patients underwent impedance-pH monitoring.

RESULTS

Mean intercellular space diameter values were significantly higher in both non-erosive (0.9 ± 0.2 μm) and erosive reflux disease (1 ± 0.2 μm) compared to controls (0.5 ± 0.2 μm, p<0.01). No difference was found between the two patient groups. Acid exposure time, the number of acid, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux events did not differ between the two patient groups. No difference was found in the mean intercellular space diameter between non-erosive reflux disease children with and without abnormal acid exposure time (1 ± 0.3 vs. 0.9 ± 0.2 μm). No correlation was found between any reflux parameter and intercellular space diameter values.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilated intercellular space diameter seems to be a useful and objective marker of oesophageal damage in paediatric gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, regardless of acid exposure. In childhood, different gastro-oesophageal reflux disease phenotypes cannot be discriminated on the basis of reflux pattern.

Mechanisms of increased gastroesophageal reflux in patients with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Up to 80% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may have increased gastroesophageal reflux (GER). It has been suggested that increased GER is due to low basal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and a high number of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs). The aim of our study was to reassess the mechanisms of GER in adult CF patients using state of the art upper-gastrointestinal physiology techniques: high-resolution manometry impedance (HRM-MII).

METHODS

We studied 12 CF patients (age 32 range (19-58), 5 males/7 females) and 11 age-matched healthy volunteers (age 27 range (20-36), 4 males /7 females). HRM-MII was performed in a semi-recumbent position for 30 min during fasting and for 2 h after a standard meal (1,000 kcal). We measured total reflux and proximal extent of reflux with impedance; basal LES pressure, TLESRs, and gastroesophageal pressure gradient (GEPG) with HRM.

RESULTS

Basal LES pressure was lower in CF patients compared with healthy controls, both in the pre- and postprandial period (preprandial 13 (7-22) vs. 24 (13-26) mm Hg, P = 0.04; postprandial 10 (8-14) vs. 18 (10-31) mm Hg, P = 0.01) and TLESRs were the main mechanism for reflux both in CF and in controls. We could not find a difference in the number of TLESRs in CF patients compared with healthy (14 (10-20) vs. 13 (10-24), P = not significant). However, reflux during TLESRs was more frequent in CF compared with healthy volunteers (80 (70-95) vs. 42 (20-78) %, P = 0.0058). GEPG during TLESRs was significantly higher in CF than in controls during inspiration (13.5 (9.5-15.8) vs. 7 (4-9.9) mm Hg, P = 0.004). This difference was due to a lower inspiratory intra-thoracic pressure in CF patients (-8.2 (-10.2-(-4.6) vs. -0.08 (-5.7-2.7) mm Hg, P = 0.002). Compared with controls, CF patients had significantly higher number of reflux episodes (13 (6-20) vs. 7 (3-9), P = 0.014) and CF patients also showed a higher proportion of reflux episodes with a high proximal extent compared with healthy volunteers (49 (22-50) vs. 0 (0-17) %, P = 0.0028).

CONCLUSIONS

CF patients have increased GER with a high proximal extent. Although we could not find a higher number of TLESRs in CF, there is a higher proportion of TLESRs associated with reflux. Unlike non-CF GER disease patients (with increased intra-abdominal pressure), reflux during TLESRs in CF is probably due to an increased GEPG mainly generated by a greater inspiratory negative intra-thoracic pressure.

Different in vitro and in vivo profiles of substituted 3-aminopropylphosphinate and 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinate GABA(B) receptor agonists as inhibitors of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Gastro-oesophageal reflux is predominantly caused by transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation (TLOSR) and GABA(B) receptor stimulation inhibits TLOSR. Lesogaberan produces fewer CNS side effects than baclofen, which has been attributed to its affinity for the GABA transporter (GAT), the action of which limits stimulation of central GABA(B) receptors. To understand the structure-activity relationship for analogues of lesogaberan (3-aminopropylphosphinic acids), and corresponding 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids, we have compared representatives of these classes in different in vitro and in vivo models.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The compounds were characterized in terms of GABA(B) agonism in vitro. Binding to GATs and cellular uptake was done using rat brain membranes and slices respectively. TLOSR was measured in dogs, and CNS side effects were evaluated as hypothermia in mice and rats.

KEY RESULTS

3-Aminopropylphosphinic acids inhibited TLOSR with a superior therapeutic index compared to 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids. This difference was most likely due to differential GAT-mediated uptake into brain cells of the former but not latter. In agreement, 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids were much more potent in producing hypothermia in rats even when administered i.c.v.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

An enhanced therapeutic window for 3-aminopropylphosphinic acids compared with 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acids with respect to inhibition of TLOSR was observed and is probably mechanistically linked to neural cell uptake of the former but not latter group of compounds. These findings offer a platform for discovery of new GABA(B) receptor agonists for the treatment of reflux disease and other conditions where selective peripheral GABA(B) receptor agonism may afford therapeutic effects.

Influence of the esophageal hiatus size on the lower esophageal sphincter, on reflux activity and on symptomatology

Hiatal hernia is an underlying factor contributing to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, it remains elusive whether the size of the esophageal hiatus has a de facto influence on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), on the intensity of patient reflux, on GERD symptoms and on the quality of life (QoL). One hundred patients with documented chronic GERD underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. QoL was evaluated before surgery using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Additionally, GERD symptoms and nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms were documented using a standardized questionnaire (score 0-224). The size of the esophageal hiatus was measured during surgery by calculating the hiatal surface area (HSA). Correlation analysis between the preoperative QoL, GERD symptoms, esophageal manometry, multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring data and HSA size was performed, in order to investigate whether the HSA has an influence on the patients'symptoms, GIQLI, manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring data. Statistical significance was set at a P-value of 0.05. The HSA sizes ranged from 1.51cm(2) to 16.09cm(2) (mean 4.14cm(2) ). The preoperative GIQLI ranged from 15 points to 133 points (mean 94.37 points). Symptom scores ranged from 2 points to 192 points (mean 49.84 points). No significant influence of the HSA on GIQLI or preoperative symptoms was recorded. HSA size had a significant negative effect on LES pressure. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between HSA size and number of refluxes in supine position. For the rest of the evaluated data, including DeMeester score, total number of refluxes, refluxes in upright position, acid reflux events, proximal reflux events, LES length and body motility, no significant correlation was found. Although patients subjectively are not significantly affected by the size of the hiatus, it has significant effects on the LES pressure and on gastroesopageal reflux in supine position.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is inversely related with glycemic control in morbidly obese patients

BACKGROUND

The link between diabetes mellitus and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial. We assessed the relationship between glycemic control (GC) and GERD in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with morbid obesity (n = 86) underwent manometry, pH-metry, endoscopy, and contrasted X-ray after responding to a GERD questionnaire and dosing fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Patients with poor GC (HbA1c, 6.1-10% and FPG < 140 mg/dl) and those with very poor GC (HbA1c > 10% or FPG > 140 mg/dl) were compared.

RESULTS

There were 63 patients with poor GC and 17 with very poor GC. Compared to patients with very poor GC, patients with poor GC showed higher heartburn scores [8 (0-12) vs. 0 (0-4); P = 0.003]; higher total esophageal acid exposure [5.2% (2.5-10.5%) vs. 2.3% (0.8-7.5%); P = 0.041]; lower distal esophageal amplitude (105 ± 38 vs. 134 ± 63 mmHg; P = 0.019); higher expiratory gastroesophageal pressure gradient (GEPG, 7 ± 3.4 vs. 5.2 ± 3 mmHg; P = 0.050); lower ventilatory gradient (inspiratory-expiratory GEPG, 10.9 ± 3.8 vs. 13.6 ± 4.1 mmHg; P = 0.012); lower waist-to-hip ratio (0.95 vs. 1; P = 0.040); and more hiatal hernia (38% vs. 6%; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests an inverse relation between glycemic control and GERD in morbidly obese patients. This can be partially explained by a lower frequency of hiatal hernia in patients with very poor glycemic control.

Mechanisms of reflux perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review

Patients with reflux symptoms often do not have excessive esophageal acid exposure, and patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux often do not have reflux symptoms. Understanding why different types of reflux induce symptoms in different patients is vital for addressing therapeutic gaps in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we review studies providing insight into how gastroesophageal reflux is perceived, with a focus on comparing reflux characteristics and esophageal sensitivity among subgroups of patients with GERD. The available studies indicate that patients with nonerosive reflux disease have fewer acid reflux episodes and thus less esophageal acid exposure than patients with reflux esophagitis but perceive less intense stimuli because of greater esophageal sensitivity. Reflux characteristics other than acidity, such as the presence of bile, pepsin, liquid, or gas in reflux, and the proximal extent or volume of reflux, may also contribute to symptom perception. Factors contributing to greater esophageal sensitivity may include impaired mucosal barrier function, peripherally mediated esophageal sensitivity (enhanced esophageal receptor signaling), and centrally mediated esophageal sensitivity (physiological stressors, sensitization of spinal sensory neurons). Further insight into mechanisms of reflux perception may require a shift toward studies aimed at understanding predisposing cellular, molecular, and genetic factors.

Objective definition and detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation revisited: is there room for improvement?

BACKGROUND

The advent of drugs that inhibit transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) necessitates accurate identification and scoring. We assessed the intra- and inter-assessor variability of the existing objective criteria for TLESR, improving them where necessary.

METHODS

Two 3-h postprandial esophageal manometric and pH recordings were performed in 20 healthy volunteers. Each recording was duplicated. The recordings were analyzed by five experienced observers for TLESRs based on their expert opinion. TLESRs were also analyzed for the presence of the original four criteria as well as inhibition of the crural diaphragm (ID), a prominent after-contraction (AC), acid reflux and an esophageal common cavity.

KEY RESULTS

The overall inter- and intra-observer agreements for TLESRs scored, according to observer's expert opinion, were 59% (range 56-67%) and 74% (60-89%), respectively. When TLESRs were restricted to those fulfilling the original criteria, these agreements fell to 46% (40-53%) and 60% (44-67%), respectively. Cleaning the recordings by removal of technically flawed sections improved agreements by 5%. Inclusion of additional criteria (ID and AC) resulted in inter- and intra-observer agreements of 62% (52-70%) and 69% (53-79%), respectively. A consensus analysis performed collectively by three observers and based on the new criteria (original ± ID and AC) resulted in 84% agreement between the paired recordings.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The original criteria for the definition of TLESRs allows for substantial inter- and intra-observer variability, which can be reduced by incorporation of additional objective criteria. However, the highest level of intra-observer agreement can be achieved by consensus analysis.

The lower esophageal sphincter

The lower esophageal sphincters (LES) together with the crural diaphragm are the major antireflux barriers protecting the esophagus from reflux of gastric content. However, reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus is a normal phenomenon in healthy individuals occurring primarily during episodes of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR), defined as LES relaxation in the absence of a swallow. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation is also the dominant mechanism of pathologic reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) patients. Frequency of TLESR does not differ significantly between healthy individuals and those with GERD, but TLESRs are more likely to be associated with acid reflux in GERD patients. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for elicitation of a TLESR, using recently introduced novel technology is an area of intense interest. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic manipulation of receptors involved in the control of TLESR has recently emerged as a potential target for GERD therapy.

Clinical significance of hiatal hernia

The relationship between hiatal hernias and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been greatly debated over the past decades, with the importance of hiatal hernias first being overemphasized and then later being nearly neglected. It is now understood that both the anatomical (hiatal hernia) and the physiological (lower esophageal sphincter) features of the gastroesophageal junction play important, but independent, roles in the pathogenesis of GERD, constituting the widely accepted "two-sphincter hypothesis." The gastroesophageal junction is an anatomically complex area with an inherent antireflux barrier function. However, the gastroesophageal junction becomes incompetent and esophageal acid clearance is compromised in patients with hiatal hernia, which facilitates the development of GERD. Of the different types of hiatal hernias (types I, II, III, and IV), type I (sliding) hiatal hernias are closely associated with GERD. Because GERD may lead to reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, a better understanding of this association is warranted. Hiatal hernias can be diagnosed radiographically, endoscopically or manometrically, with each modality having its own limitations, especially in the diagnosis of hiatal hernias less than 2 cm in length. In the future, high resolution manometry should be a promising method for accurately assessing the association between hiatal hernias and GERD. The treatment of a hiatal hernia is similar to the management of GERD and should be reserved for those with symptoms attributable to this condition. Surgery should be considered for those patients with refractory symptoms and for those who develop complications, such as recurrent bleeding, ulcerations or strictures.

Clinical significance of hiatal hernia

The relationship between hiatal hernias and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been greatly debated over the past decades, with the importance of hiatal hernias first being overemphasized and then later being nearly neglected. It is now understood that both the anatomical (hiatal hernia) and the physiological (lower esophageal sphincter) features of the gastroesophageal junction play important, but independent, roles in the pathogenesis of GERD, constituting the widely accepted "two-sphincter hypothesis." The gastroesophageal junction is an anatomically complex area with an inherent antireflux barrier function. However, the gastroesophageal junction becomes incompetent and esophageal acid clearance is compromised in patients with hiatal hernia, which facilitates the development of GERD. Of the different types of hiatal hernias (types I, II, III, and IV), type I (sliding) hiatal hernias are closely associated with GERD. Because GERD may lead to reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, a better understanding of this association is warranted. Hiatal hernias can be diagnosed radiographically, endoscopically or manometrically, with each modality having its own limitations, especially in the diagnosis of hiatal hernias less than 2 cm in length. In the future, high resolution manometry should be a promising method for accurately assessing the association between hiatal hernias and GERD. The treatment of a hiatal hernia is similar to the management of GERD and should be reserved for those with symptoms attributable to this condition. Surgery should be considered for those patients with refractory symptoms and for those who develop complications, such as recurrent bleeding, ulcerations or strictures.

Non-erosive and uncomplicated erosive reflux diseases: Difference in physiopathological and symptom pattern

AIM: To investigate differences in the physiopathological findings (manometry and pH monitoring) and symptoms between cases of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD) found positive at 24 h pH monitoring.

METHODS: For a total of 670 patients who underwent 24 h pH monitoring, esophageal manometry and upper endoscopy were retrospectively evaluated, assessing the reflux symptoms, manometric characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body and the presence or absence of esophagitis and hiatal hernia. Typical and atypical symptoms were also evaluated. For inclusion in the study, patients had to have NERD or ERD and be found positive on pH monitoring (NERD+). Patients with Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) complicated by stenosis, ulcers or Barrett's esophagus were ruled out.

RESULTS: 214 patients were involved in the study, i.e. 107 cases of NERD+ and 107 of ERD. There were no significant gender- or age-related differences between the two groups. The ERD group had more cases of hiatal hernia (P = 0.02) and more acid reflux, both in terms of number of reflux episodes (P = 0.01) and as a percentage of the total time with a pH < 4 (P = 0.00), when upright (P = 0.007) and supine (P = 0.00). The NERD+ cases had more reflux episodes while upright (P = 0.02) and the ERD cases while supine (P = 0.01). The LES pressure was higher in cases of NERD+ (P = 0.03) while the amplitude and duration of their esophageal peristaltic waves tended to be better than in the ERD group (P >0.05). The NERD+ patients presented more often with atypical symptoms (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The NERD+ patients’ fewer reflux episodes and the fact that they occurred mainly while in the upright position (unlike the cases of ERD) may be two factors that do not favor the onset of esophagitis. The frequently atypical symptoms seen in patients with NERD+ need to be accurately evaluated for therapeutic purposes because patients with GERD and atypical symptoms generally respond only partially to medical and surgical treatments.

Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Non-specific esophageal dysmotility with impaired clearance is often present in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially those with erosive disease; however the physio-mechanic basis of esophageal dysfunction is not well defined.

METHODS

Retrospective assessment of patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; n=20) and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD; n=20) with pathologic acid exposure on pH studies (>4.2% time/24 h) and also healthy controls (n=20) studied by high resolution manometry. Esophageal motility in response to liquid and solid bolus swallows and multiple water swallows (MWS) was analyzed. Peristaltic dysfunction was defined as failed peristalsis, spasm, weak or poorly coordinated esophageal contraction (>3cm break in 30 mmHg isocontour).

KEY RESULTS

Peristaltic dysfunction was present in 33% of water swallows in controls, 56% ENRD and 76% ERD respectively (P<0.023 vs controls, P=0.185 vs ENRD). The proportion of effective peristaltic contractions improved with solid compared to liquid bolus in controls (18%vs 33%, P=0.082) and ENRD (22%vs 54%, P=0.046) but not ERD (62%vs 76%, P=0.438). Similarly, MWS was followed by effective peristalsis in 83% of controls and 70% ENRD but only 30% ERD patients (P<0.017 vs controls and P<0.031 vs ENRD). The association between acid exposure and dysmotility was closer for solid than liquid swallows (r=0.52 vs 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Peristaltic dysfunction is common in GERD. ERD patients are characterized by a failure to respond to the physiologic challenge of solid bolus and MWS that is likely also to impair clearance following reflux events and increase exposure to gastric refluxate.

Nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux revisited by impedance-pH monitoring

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Impedance-pH monitoring allows detailed characterization of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal activity associated with reflux. We assessed the characteristics of nocturnal reflux and esophageal activity preceding and following reflux.

METHODS

Impedance-pH tracings from 11 healthy subjects and 76 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease off acid-suppressive therapy were analyzed. Characteristics of nocturnal supine reflux, time distribution and esophageal activity seen on impedance at 2 minute intervals preceding and following reflux were described.

RESULTS

Patients had more nocturnal reflux events than healthy subjects (8 [4-12] vs 2 [1-5], P = 0.002), with lower proportion of weakly acidic reflux (57% [35-78] vs 80% [60-100], P = 0.044). Nocturnal reflux was mainly liquid (80%) and reached the proximal esophagus more often in patients (6% vs 0%, P = 0.047). Acid reflux predominated in the first 2 hours (66%) and weakly acidic reflux in the last 3 hours (70%) of the night. Most nocturnal reflux was preceded by aboral flows and cleared by short lasting volume clearance. In patients, prolonged chemical clearance was associated with less esophageal activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Nocturnal weakly acidic reflux is as common as acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and predominates later in the night. Impedance-pH can predict prolonged chemical clearance after nocturnal acid reflux.

Review article: the clinical relevance of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSR) are considered the physiological mechanism that enables venting of gas from the stomach and appear as sphincter relaxations that are not induced by swallowing. It has become increasingly clear that most reflux episodes occur during TLOSRs and therefore play a key role in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To describe the current knowledge about TLOSRs and its clinical implications.

METHODS

Search of the literature published in English using the PubMed database and relevant abstracts presented at international conventions.

RESULTS

Several factors influence the rate of TLOSRs including anti-reflux surgery, meal, body position, nutrition, lifestyle and a wide array of neurotransmitters. Ongoing insights in the neurotransmitters responsible for the modulation of TLOSRs, as well as the neural pathways involved in TLOSR induction, have lead to novel therapeutic targets. These therapeutic targets can serve as an add-on therapy in patients with an unsatisfactory response to proton pump inhibitor by inhibiting TLOSRs and its associated reflux events. However, the TLOSR-inhibiting drugs that are currently available still have significant side effects.

CONCLUSION

It is likely that in the future, selected GERD patients may benefit from transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation inhibition when compounds are found without significant side effects.

Classical reflux symptoms, hiatus hernia and overweight independently predict pharyngeal acid exposure in patients with suspected reflux laryngitis

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with reflux laryngitis.

AIMS

To investigate the risk factors and the predictors of pharyngeal acid reflux (PAR) in Taiwanese patients with suspected reflux laryngitis.

METHODS

With referral from ENT physicians, 104 patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of reflux laryngitis completed a validated symptom questionnaire, an upper endoscopy exam and ambulatory 24-h pH tests with three sensors located at the hypopharynx, proximal and distal oesophagus. Patients with one or more episodes of PAR were considered abnormal.

RESULTS

Pharyngeal acid reflux was identified in 17% (18/104) of patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, PAR was independently associated with classical reflux symptoms [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-12.8], hiatus hernia (aOR = 6.7, 95% CI: 1.5-30.2) and overweight (aOR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.0-11.0). In predicting PAR, classical reflux symptoms had a sensitivity of 78% and hiatus hernia had a specificity of 95%. With all three factors, the positive predictive value for PAR was 80%. Classical reflux symptoms included heartburn, chest pain, dyspepsia and acid regurgitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Classical reflux symptoms, hiatus hernia and overweight are independent risk factors that may predict pharyngeal acid reflux in patients with suspected reflux laryngitis.

Beyond acid suppression: new pharmacologic approaches for treatment of GERD

Proton pump inhibitors are highly successful in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease, but a significant proportion of patients have persistent symptoms from weakly or nonacidic reflux. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) represents the dominant mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux and has therefore become the most intensely investigated therapeutic target. The triggering of TLESR involve the vagal pathways and the gamma-aminobutyric type B (GABA(B)) and metabotropic glutamate type 5 (mGluR5) receptors. Baclofen is a GABA(B) receptor agonist that is effective in inhibiting TLESR and reducing the number of reflux episodes, but is associated with significant central nervous system (CNS) side effects. The newer GABA(B) agonists, such as AZD9343 and AZD3355, and mGluR5 antagonists, such as 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), have been shown in small, randomized, controlled trials to have comparable efficacy to baclofen, but possibly a more favorable CNS side effect profile. Cannibinoid agonists, such as Delta(9)-THC, have also been demonstrated to reduce TLESRs and reflux events respectively. Macrolide antibiotics (eg, erythromycin) show early promise in a select group of patients with possible reflux associated post-lung transplant problems.

Alterations confined to the gastro-oesophageal junction: the relationship between low LOSP, TLOSRs, hiatus hernia and acid pocket

The gastro-oesophageal junction is a specialised segment of the gut designed to prevent reflux of gastric contents into the oesophagus. This task is fulfilled by two structures, i.e. the lower oesophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm, which generate a high pressure zone. Especially during low pressure at the junction, as in case of long-lasting transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations, reflux can occur but mainly if a positive pressure gradient exists between stomach and the oesphagogastric junction. Although patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have increased oesophageal acid exposure compared to controls, the number of transient relaxations is not increased compared to healthy controls. Instead, the risk to have acid reflux is at least doubled in patients, especially in those with a hiatal hernia, most likely as a result of the supradiaphragmatic position of the acid pocket. In hiatal hernia patients, the acid pocket is indeed often trapped in the hernia above the diaphragm. Which factors exactly determine the physical composition (liquid or gas) and the proximal extent of the refluxate however requires further research.

Acoustic cough-reflux associations in chronic cough: potential triggers and mechanisms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Central sensitization is thought to play a role in chronic cough and might explain the temporal association between cough and gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) in patients in whom non-GOR causes have been excluded. Using our novel simultaneous acoustic cough recording and impedance/pH monitoring technique, we aimed to explore this further by assessing such temporal associations and their relationship to the acidity, duration, and proximal extent of reflux and the presence of erosive disease and cough reflex sensitivity in unselected patients (ie, including non-GOR causes) with chronic cough.

METHODS

Twenty-four hour ambulatory acoustic cough monitoring with simultaneous impedance/pH recording was carried out in 71 unselected patients with chronic cough, aged 51-64 years (47 female). In addition, all patients underwent cough reflex sensitivity testing to citric acid, and 66 patients underwent gastroscopy. Temporal associations between cough and reflux were expressed using the symptom association probability.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of patients exhibited temporal associations, with 48% having a positive symptom association probability (SAP(R-C)) for cough preceded by reflux (mainly distal), 56% a positive symptom association probability (SAP(C-R (2 min))) for reflux preceded by cough, and 32% both. Moreover, SAP(R-C) positive patients had a more sensitive cough reflex (P = .03) but similar esophageal reflux exposure and erosive disease, together with similar prevalence of extraesophageal causes of cough compared with SAP(R-C) negative patients. Reflux immediately following cough was rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Cough temporally associates with reflux irrespective of proposed diagnoses, may be self-perpetuating in some patients, and is likely to be driven by central processes.

Effect of proximal gastric volume on hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND

Spatial separation of the diaphragm and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) occurs frequently and intermittently in patients with a sliding hiatus hernia and favors gastro-esophageal reflux. This can be studied with high-resolution manometry. Although fundic accommodation is associated with a lower basal LES pressure, its effect on esophagogastric junction configuration and hiatal hernia is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between proximal gastric volume, the presence of a hiatal hernia profile and acid reflux.

METHODS

Twenty gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients were studied and compared to 20 healthy controls. High-resolution manometry and pH recording were performed for 1 h before and 2 h following meal ingestion (500 mL per 300 kcal). Volume of the proximal stomach was assessed with three-dimensional ultrasonography before and every 15 min after meal ingestion.

KEY RESULTS

During fasting, the hernia profile [2 separate high-pressure zones (HPZs) at manometry] was present for 31.9 +/- 4.9 min h(-1) (53.2%) in GERD patients, and 8.7 +/- 3.3 min h(-1) (14.5%) in controls (P < 0.001). In GERD patients, the presence of hernia profile decreased during the first postprandial hour to 15.9 +/- 4.2 min h(-1), 26.5%, P < 0.01 whilst this phenomenon was not observed in controls. The rate of transition between the two profiles was 5.7 +/- 1.1 per hour in GERD patients and 2.5 +/- 1.0 per hour in controls (P < 0.001). The pre and postprandial acid reflux rate in GERD patients during the hernia profile (6.4 +/- 1.1 per hour and 18.4 +/- 4.3 per hour respectively) was significantly higher than during reduced hernia (2.1 +/- 0.6 per hour; P < 0.05 and 3.8 +/- 0.9 per hour; P < 0.05). A similar difference was found in controls. Furthermore, an inverse correlation was found between fundic volume and the time the hernia profile was present (r = -0.45; P < 0.05) in GERD patients, but not in controls.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

(i) In GERD patients a postprandial increase in proximal gastric volume is accompanied by a decrease in hernia prevalence, which can be explained by a reduction of the intra-thoracic part of the stomach. (ii) A temporal hernia profile also occurs in healthy subjects. (iii) During the hernia profile, acid reflux is more prevalent, especially after meal ingestion.

The role of gastro-oesophageal pressure gradient and sliding hiatal hernia on pathological gastro-oesophageal reflux in severely obese patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The relationship between gastro-oesophageal pressure gradient (GOPG), sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is under investigation. We assessed whether GOPG and SHH are predictors of pathological reflux in severely obese patients.

METHODS

Ninety-four consecutive patients were prospectively studied with oesophageal manometry, 24-h pH monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow X-ray. Inspiratory and expiratory GOPGs were measured at manometry testing, whereas SHH was characterized by X-ray. Patients were classified as having physiological or pathological reflux depending on pH monitoring. Patients with oesophagitis but normal pH testing were excluded.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients composed the study sample (25 men, 38.3+/-11.1 years; BMI 45+/-6.9 kg/m). Sixty-two patients (70%) had pathological reflux, whereas 27 patients (30%) had physiological reflux. Pathological reflux was predicted either by inspiratory GOPG [prevalence ratio (PR) =1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.08; P<0.001] or by expiratory GOPG (PR=1.07; 95% CI: 1.03-1.11; P=0.001). Accordingly, an increment of 1 mmHg in inspiratory and expiratory GOPGs raises the risk of pathological reflux in 5 and 7%, respectively. Pathological reflux was also predicted by SHH (PR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.19-2.00; P=0.001), which increases the risk of abnormal reflux in 54%.

CONCLUSION

In severely obese patients, either inspiratory GOPG, expiratory GOPG or SHH are predictors of pathological reflux. These findings give pathophysiological support to the high prevalence of GORD in this population.

Nonerosive Reflux Disease (NERD) - An Update

Recognizing nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) as a distinct presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was one of the most important developments in the field of GERD in the last decade. Whilst the definition of NERD has not changed significantly over the years, the disorder accounts for the majority of the GERD patients and those who failed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Recent developments in NERD focused primarily on understanding the pathophysiology and natural history. The introduction of esophageal impedance + pH has led to the assessment of other forms of gastroesophageal reflux in causing NERD. Therapeutic modalities still focus on acid suppression, but there is growing recognition that other therapeutic strategies should be considered in NERD.

GABAB receptor agonism as a novel therapeutic modality in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Defined pharmacologically by its insensitivity to the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline and sensitivity to the GABA analogue baclofen, the G protein-linked gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor couples to adenylyl cyclase, voltage-gated calcium channels, and inwardly-rectifying potassium channels. On the basis of a wealth of preclinical data in conjunction with early clinical observations that baclofen improves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the GABA(B) receptor has been proposed as a therapeutic target for a number of diseases including GERD. Subsequently, there has been a significant effort to develop a peripherally-restricted GABA(B) agonist that is devoid of the central nervous system side effects that are observed with baclofen. In this article we review the in vitro and in vivo pharmacology of the peripherally-restricted GABA(B) receptor agonists and the preclinical and clinical development of lesogaberan (AZD3355, (R)-(3-amino-2-fluoropropyl) phosphinic acid), a potent and predominately peripherally-restricted GABA(B) receptor agonist with a preclinical therapeutic window superior to baclofen.

The size of the esophageal hiatus in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology: outcome of intraoperative measurements

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the size of the esophageal hiatus on lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and acid reflux.

METHODS

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent Nissen fundoplication in 2006-2008 were included. All underwent esophageal manometry and 22 had 24-h pH monitoring. The area of the esophageal hiatus was calculated from a photograph shot during surgery. A hiatal index was calculated via division of hiatal area with body mass index (BMI). Correlation and logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (average age 44, 14 males) were enrolled. The mean BMI, LESP, DeMeester score, hiatal area, and hiatal index were 27 +/- 3.9 kg/m(2), 11.7 +/- 6.6 mmHg, 43 +/- 34, 3.83 +/- 1.24 cm(2), and 0.143 +/- 0.048, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between hiatal area, hiatal index and LESP (-0.513, p = 0.005, r = -0.439, p = 0.019 respectively). Additionally there was a negative correlation between hiatal area and total LES length (r = -0.508, p = 0.013) and a significant positive correlation between hiatal area, hiatal index, and DeMeester scores (0.452, p = 0.035, 0.537, p = 0.01, respectively). Height and hiatal area were significant factors in multiple linear regression.

CONCLUSIONS

The size of the esophageal hiatus significantly affects LESP and acid reflux, and hiatal index is a new value, which appears to reflect the amount of acid reflux. Total LES length is also shortened in patients with a large hiatus.

The role of excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially reflux esophagitis (RE), is characterized by excessive esophageal acid exposure. Transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation is the major mechanism of acid reflux episodes in both healthy subjects (HS) and patients with GERD. In the sitting position, where acid reflux episodes often occur, there is no difference in the frequency of transient LES relaxations between these two groups; however, in patients with GERD, at 5 cm above the LES, the proportion of acid reflux episodes during transient LES relaxations is significantly greater than in the HS group. This difference is considered to be one of the causes of excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with GERD, but its cause is still unclear. A recent study, which investigated the proportion of acid reflux episodes during transient LES relaxations at 2 and 7 cm above the LES, showed that there was no difference at 2 cm above the LES between HS and patients with RE, but at 7 cm they were significantly greater in patients with RE than in HS. Evaluation of acid reflux at 2 cm above the LES is difficult to measure, but the proximal extent of refluxate could be one of the important factors of excessive acid esophageal exposure in patients with RE. Ineffective esophageal motility, found in patients with moderate to severe RE, impairs esophageal bolus clearance of acid, therefore both the proximal extent of refluxate and the delay of esophageal bolus clearance of acid could be major causes of excessive esophageal acid exposure. Hiatus hernia also causes acid reflux, due to its association with hypotensive LES, and also impairs esophageal bolus clearance of acid.

Reasons of PEG failure to eliminate gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients

AIM: To investigate factors predicting failure of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) to eliminate gastroesophageal reflux (GER).

METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive mechanically ventilated patients were investigated. Patients were evaluated for GER by pH-metry pre-PEG and on the 7th post-PEG day. Endoscopic and histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis was also carried out. A beneficial response to PEG was considered when pH-metry on the 7th post-PEG day showed that GER was below 4%.

RESULTS: Seventeen patients responded (RESP group) and 12 did not respond (N-RESP) to PEG. The mean age, sex, weight and APACHE II score were similar in both groups. GER (%) values were similar in both groups at baseline, but were significantly reduced in the RESP group compared with the N-RESP group on the 7th post-PEG day [2.5 (0.6-3.8) vs 8.1 (7.4-9.2, P < 0.001)]. Reflux esophagitis and the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grading differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.031 and P = 0.020, respectively). Histology revealed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Endoscopic grading of GEFV and the presence of severe reflux esophagitis are predisposing factors for failure of PEG to reduce GER in mechanically ventilated patients.

The GABA(B) receptor agonist AZD9343 inhibits transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and acid reflux in healthy volunteers: a phase I study

BACKGROUND

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) represent an interesting target for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Baclofen reduces TLESRs and reflux episodes, but is not optimal for clinical application because of its central side effects. Therefore, new agents are required.

AIM

To study the effect of AZD9343, a new selective GABA(B) receptor agonist, in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

A total of 27 subjects participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, two-centre phase I study. Subjects underwent oesophageal manometry and pH-metry for 3 h postprandially. Before meal ingestion, a single oral dose of placebo, 60 and 320 mg AZD9343 or 40 mg baclofen was given on four separate days.

RESULTS

Somnolence was reported after 320 mg AZD9343 and baclofen. Reversible short-lasting paraesthesia was reported after AZD9343. AZD9343 320 mg and baclofen significantly reduced the number of TLESRs with 32% and 40% respectively. Acid reflux was significantly decreased by AZD9343 and baclofen. Like baclofen, AZD9343 increased LES pressure before meal intake. AZD9343 320 mg and baclofen significantly reduced the swallowing rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Like baclofen, AZD9343 dose-dependently decreases the number of TLESRs and acid reflux episodes, increases LES pressure and reduces swallowing, extending the concept that GABA(B) agonists are potent reflux inhibitors. However, discovery of analogues with an improved side effect profile is warranted.

[Novel aspects in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease]

In addition to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations and decreased LES tone, increased intra-abdominal pressure can also play role in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD),.

AIM

To analyze the correlation between occupation-related increased intra-abdominal pressure or straining (experienced for years) and the prevalence of GERD symptoms.

METHODS

Reflux symptoms were analyzed through a questionnaire among professional singers, wind players and glassblowers in comparison with controls.

RESULTS

Heartburn, regurgitation and hoarseness were significantly more frequent among professional singers than in controls (P<0.001). Among wind players heartburn (P<0.05) and regurgitation (P<0.01), among glassblowers regurgitation (P<0.01) were significantly more frequent in comparison with control subjects. Reflux symptoms correlated significantly with the duration of professional activity (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that reflux symptoms are more frequent among subjects with occupation-related increased intra-abdominal pressure. GERD seems to be a work-related disease in this aspect.

Surfing as a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in surfers versus nonsurfers who participate in other sports activities based on the hypothesis that paddling in the prone position on hard surfboard surfaces leads to increased intra-abdominal pressure and GERD.

STUDY DESIGN

A questionnaire survey using a modified Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale.

SETTING

Data obtained from surfers and nonsurfer athletes on the island of Oahu in the state of Hawaii.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eighty-five surfers and 178 nonsurfers who participate in sports activities.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS

Surfer or nonsurfer status, type of surfboard used, frequency of surfing, and duration of surfing experience.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prevalence of reflux symptoms at least twice a week (GERD).

RESULTS

The prevalence of GERD was significantly higher in short-board surfers than in nonsurfers with an odds ratio of 4.6 (28% versus 7%, P < 0.001) after adjustment for demographic variables using the multivariate regression model. GERD was more prevalent in short-boarders than long-boarders (28% and 12%, respectively). The prevalence of GERD increased significantly as both the frequency and duration of surfing experience increased (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surfing is strongly associated with GERD. Short-board surfing appears to have a stronger association with GERD than long-board surfing.

Update on esophagitis: controversial and underdiagnosed causes

CONTEXT

Esophagitis is a common cause of symptoms for which patients seek the advice of a physician. Esophagitis of differing etiologies often demonstrate overlapping histopathologic features, making their distinction difficult. This is especially true in esophageal disorders associated with increased numbers of intraepithelial eosinophils, some of which have just recently been recognized.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the important clinical and pathologic features of the 2 most common disorders associated with esophageal eosinophilic infiltrates--reflux esophagitis and eosinophilic esophagitis--with special emphasis on features that allow the surgical pathologist to distinguish between these disorders. The various forms of drug-induced esophagitis are also discussed because these are frequently underrecognized by pathologists.

DATA SOURCES

Data were extracted from articles identified through PubMed-based research. Histologic figures have been taken from the personal case collection of the author.

CONCLUSIONS

Reflux and eosinophilic esophagitis demonstrate overlapping histologic features, which may make their distinction difficult. Drug-induced esophagitis is probably a common phenomenon but is underrecognized by pathologists.

Increased intragastric pressure gradients are involved in the occurrence of acid reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Increased pressure gradients across the esophagogastric junction (DeltaEGJp) play a role in gastroesophageal flow during TLESR. The aim of this study was to further explore DeltaEGJp in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and controls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty GERD patients were studied along with 20 control subjects. High resolution manometry and pH recording were performed 1 h before and 2 h after a liquid meal (500 ml/300 kcal). DeltaEGJp was calculated at the start of a TLESR and at 180, 60, and 10 s before TLESR.

RESULTS

DeltaEGJp at the start of a TLESR and at 180, 60, and 10 s before TLESR was markedly increased in GERD patients compared with that in control subjects (9.9 mmHg and 7.5 mmHg, respectively; p<0.05). Whilst intragastric pressure gradients in GERD patients were increased compared with those in controls (4.6 mmHg and 2.5 mmHg, respectively; p<0.01), intraesophageal pressure gradients were similar in both groups. Furthermore, in controls, first- and second-hour postprandial intragastric pressures were decreased compared with in fasting periods (1.9 +/- 0.4 mmHg and 2.1 +/- 0.4 mmHg versus 3.5 +/- 0.4 mmHg; p<0.05), while this was not observed in GERD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In GERD patients, DeltaEGJp is greater than that in controls both before and during TLESR. This phenomenon is caused by increased intragastric pressure and might contribute to increased rates of acid reflux during TLESR in GERD patients.

Recent developments in gastrointestinal motility

In the past decade, the results of many studies on gastrointestinal motility and perception have been published that may be relevant to the clinician. A new classification of oesophageal motor disorders has been proposed in which "ineffective oesophageal motility" largely replaces the former "non-specific oesophageal motor disorders". Recent studies have shown that the incidence of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations can be reduced pharmacologically, and this may open doors to a new therapeutic approach in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The mechanisms through which hiatus hernia promotes reflux have become clearer. The recently developed technique of intraluminal impedance monitoring has made it possible to study oesophageal transit, non-acid reflux and its role in the generation of reflux symptoms, as well as the characteristics of belching. Measurement of gastric emptying by means of a non-radioactive isotope and breath-testing has become widely available but, unfortunately, this development has not yet been accompanied by the advent of new therapeutic options for gastroparesis. The term "enteric dysmotility" has been coined for the condition in which upper abdominal symptoms are associated with distinct small intestinal bowel motility disorders in the absence of ileus-like episodes. The role of high-amplitude propagated contractions in the pathogenesis of constipation has been further defined. In cases of suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, manometry of both sphincters (IBD and pancreatic) is now felt to be advisable.

Does the presence of a hiatal hernia affect the efficacy of the reflux inhibitor baclofen during add-on therapy?

OBJECTIVES

Reflux inhibitors, like the gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor agonist, baclofen, block transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and are proposed as an add-on therapy in patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant gastroesophageal reflux. However, as other mechanisms of reflux become more important in the presence of a hiatal hernia (HH), the efficacy of reflux inhibitors to reduce acid and non-acid exposure may be hampered. Therefore, we compared the effect of baclofen in patients with no HH (-HH) and those with a large HH during PPI treatment.

METHODS

A total of 27 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients on PPI were included; 16 had -HH and 11 had a large (> or =3 cm) HH (+HH). During PPI treatment, the effect of baclofen (3 x 20 mg) on acid and non-acid reflux was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Reflux was measured during 24 h using combined esophageal impedance and pH-metry.

RESULTS

The majority of reflux events consisted of both gaseous and liquid reflux with a significant increase in non-acid, mixed reflux episodes in +HH patients compared with those in -HH patients. Acid exposure time was in the normal range in both patient groups during both placebo and baclofen. In this study, baclofen significantly reduced the total number of reflux episodes with 36% in -HH patients and 43% in +HH patients, but did not change the number of acid reflux episodes or total acid exposure time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that baclofen is also effective in patients with GERD with +HH, further underscoring the potential of reflux inhibitors as treatment of GERD.