Similar Effects of Atorvastatin, Simvastatin and Pravastatin on Thrombogenic and Inflammatory Parameters in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia

Does aggressive statin therapy offer improved cholesterol-independent benefits compared to conventional statin treatment?

There is currently intense research interest in the properties of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) beyond their well-documented lipid-lowering action. Studies have consistently demonstrated that administration of statin therapy decreases levels of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This effect appears to be independent of the extent of reduction in total or LDL-cholesterol. Statins also appear to improve endothelial dysfunction by increasing endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. There is also evidence that statins inhibit fibrin formation and thrombus development, an effect that which would be clinically beneficial following plaque fissure or rupture. Early preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that there are quantitative differences between statin regimens in terms of their cholesterol-independent properties. Trials comparing equipotent doses of different statins, based on lipid-lowering efficacy, have not reported any differences in cholesterol-independent properties. However, the current evidence base indicates that more aggressive statin regimens are associated with an enhanced anti-inflammatory effect. Intensive lipid-lowering using statin therapy generates a greater reduction in mortality than standard lipid management, and it is possible that enhanced cholesterol-independent effects may account for some of this excess benefit.

Effects of atorvastatin (10 mg) on hemostatic and inflammatory parameters in hyperlipidemic patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease

Hyperlipidemic patients with coronary heart disease were treated with atorvastatin, and its effects on hemostatic and inflammatory parameters were assessed. After 3 months of therapy, the plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor, prothrombin fragment 1+2, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, von Willebrand factor, and fibrinogen were significantly reduced; no significant reductions were observed in lipoprotein(a) and tissue plasminogen activator antigen levels.

A Novel Anti-Inflammatory Role of Simvastatin in a Murine Model of Allergic Asthma

Statins, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, are effective serum cholesterol-lowering agents in clinical practice, and they may also have anti-inflammatory properties. Asthma is characterized by chronic eosinophilic inflammation in the airways, which is thought to be regulated by the activity of T lymphocytes. We therefore examined the anti-inflammatory activity of simvastatin in a murine model of allergic asthma. In mice previously sensitized to OVA, simvastatin treatment, either orally or i.p., reduced the total inflammatory cell infiltrate and eosinophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in response to inhaled OVA challenge. Simvastatin therapy i.p. was also associated with a reduction in IL-4 and IL-5 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and, at higher doses, a histological reduction in inflammatory infiltrates in the lungs. OVA-induced IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IFN-gamma secretion was reduced in thoracic lymph node cultures from simvastatin-treated mice. Simvastatin treatment did not alter serum total IgE or OVA-specific IgG1 and IgG2a levels. These data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of statin-sensitive pathways in allergic airways disease.

Effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coagulation and fibrinolysis processes

Recent large clinical trials have demonstrated that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, or statins, markedly reduce morbidity and mortality when used in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. It has been established that the benefits of statin therapy in cardiovascular disease can be explained not only by the lipid-lowering potential of statins but also by nonlipid-related mechanisms (so-called "pleiotropic effects") that contribute to the positive effect of statins on the incidence of cardiovascular events. The coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are two separate but reciprocally linked enzyme cascades that regulate the formation and breakdown of fibrin. Numerous studies have demonstrated that disturbances of coagulation and fibrinolysis contribute to the development and progression of atherosclerosis, and that they affect the incidence of atherosclerosis-related clinical events. High plasma levels or activities of fibrinogen, factor VII, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor (vWF), soluble thrombomodulin, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are thought to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular disease. Experimental studies and many clinical studies have recently shown that statins produce favourable effects on haemostatic parameters, including those that are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Statins diminish procoagulant activity, which is observed at different stages of the coagulation cascade, including tissue factor (TF) activity, conversion of prothrombin to thrombin and thrombin activity. In some studies, statins also reduced fibrinogen levels. By altering the levels and activities of tPA and PAI-1, statins seem to stimulate fibrinolysis. The data on the effects of combined treatment with statins and other drugs on haemostasis are rather limited. They suggest that statins combined with fibric acid derivatives, omega-3 fatty acids and 17beta-estradiol are superior to statins alone. The only two clinical studies performed in patients with acute coronary syndromes showed a relatively weak effect of statins on haemostasis in those patients. Although various statins may produce different effects on individual variables, there are no convincing data showing that differences in their physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties significantly alter their net effect on excessive procoagulant activity. Apart from the lipid-lowering effect, statins suppress the synthesis of several important nonsterol isoprenoids derived from the mevalonate pathway, especially farnesyl and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphates, which via enhanced protein prenylation, are involved in the regulation of many cellular processes. It is presumed that the inhibitory effect of statins on the mevalonate pathway is involved in the regulation of some key steps of coagulation and fibrinolysis processes. In this way they probably regulate the synthesis of TF, tPA and PAI-1, and perhaps they also control the generation and activity of thrombin. The beneficial effects of statins on coagulation and fibrinolysis may be responsible for their ability to decrease the number of cardiovascular events. The lipid-independent effects of statins on haemostasis may contribute to the marked decrease in the incidence rates of mortality, hospitalisation and revascularisation in patients treated with these drugs.

Simvastatin-induced myocardial protection against ischemia–reperfusion injury is mediated by activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have suggested that the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury. We investigated whether pretreatment with simvastatin reduces myocardial infarct size and whether glyburide, a non-selective inhibitor of the ATP-sensitive K channels, abrogates this infarct size-limiting effect.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with either simvastatin (20 mg/kg per day) or saline alone for 3 days. Additional groups of rats were treated as above and on the fourth day they received intravenous glyburide (0.3 mg/kg). All rats underwent 30 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 180 min of reperfusion. Ischemic myocardium at risk was assessed with blue dye and infarct size with triphenyltetrazolium chloride.

RESULTS

Infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the myocardium at risk, was significantly smaller in the simvastatin group (n = 8, 20.8 +/- 3.4%) than in the placebo group (n = 6, 40.1 +/- 2.7%) (P = 0.001). Glyburide abolished the protective effect of simvastatin with infarct size being 34.2 +/- 6.9% and 29.7 +/- 3.9% of the area at risk in the simvastatin group (n = 7) and placebo (n = 7) group, respectively (P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Simvastatin significantly reduced myocardial infarct size. The protective effect was completely abrogated by glyburide, strongly suggesting that this protective effect is mediated via activation of the ATP-sensitive K channels.

Anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant effects of pravastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased plasma concentrations of coagulation and inflammation markers. Different studies have shown that treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) is associated with antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects in addition to a cholesterol-lowering effect. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of pravastatin (40 mg/day) on coagulation and inflammation markers in type 2 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an open, randomized, crossover study designed with an 8-week intervention period. The study group was comprised of 50 patients with type 2 diabetes (median HbA(1c) 7.1%) and serum total cholesterol of 5-10 mmol/l. We evaluated plasma levels of fibrinogen, F1 + 2, D-dimer, soluble tissue factor (sTF), von Willebrand Factor antigen (vWFag), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood samples drawn after fasting on day 1 and after 8 and 16 weeks.

RESULTS

Significant reductions of total cholesterol (-22%; P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (-32%; P < 0.001), and triglycerides (-10%; P < 0.05) were achieved after 8 weeks of treatment with pravastatin. In addition, significant reductions of plasma levels of F1 + 2 (-4.4%; P < 0.05), vWFag (-5.3%; P < 0.05), and sTF (-3.4%; P < 0.05) were observed after treatment with pravastatin. Furthermore, plasma levels of CRP were also significantly reduced (-13%; P < 0.05). Levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer did not decrease after treatment with pravastatin.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that pravastatin reduces levels of coagulation and inflammation markers in type 2 diabetic patients. These antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects of treatment with statins could play a role in reducing cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetic patients.

The effects of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, on markers of endothelial cell activation, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels in non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the effect of rosiglitazone on markers of endothelial cell activation and acute-phase reactants in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays a key role in all stages of atherosclerosis and in the genesis of acute coronary syndromes. Rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist, is used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and previous data suggest that it may have anti-inflammatory effects on atherosclerosis.

METHODS

Patients with stable, angiographically documented CAD without diabetes mellitus were investigated. Patients were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive treatment with placebo or rosiglitazone (4 mg/day for 8 weeks followed by 8 mg/day for 4 weeks) for 12 weeks. Eighty-four patients completed the study. Fasting glucose, insulin, lipid profile, markers of endothelial activation, and inflammatory markers were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Rosiglitazone treatment resulted in a significant reduction in E-selectin (p = 0.03), von Willebrand factor (p = 0.007), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p = 0.003) and the homeostasis model of insulin resistance index (p = 0.02), compared with placebo. Significant elevations in low-density lipoprotein and triglyceride levels were observed in the rosiglitazone group (p < 0.01). Within the rosiglitazone-treated group, reductions in C-reactive protein and von Willebrand factor were significantly correlated with a reduction in insulin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosiglitazone significantly reduces markers of endothelial cell activation and levels of acute-phase reactants in CAD patients without diabetes. Potential underlying mechanisms include insulin sensitization and direct modification of transcription within the vessel wall.

Plasma C-reactive protein as a marker of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

This study was initiated to determine whether heart transplant recipients (HTRs) with cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) have increased levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and to examine whether an increase in hsCRP after heart transplantation predicts the development of CAV. Furthermore, the effect of pravastatin on plasma levels of hsCRP in HTRs was investigated.

BACKGROUND

The relationship between CAV and hsCRP, as well as the effect of statins on hsCRP in HTRs, has not been well established.

METHODS

On referral for their annual angiographic control study, 150 consecutive HTRs (mean 6.5 years since transplantation) were included. Plasma levels of hsCRP were measured before angiography and compared with patients with (n = 52) and without (n = 98) CAV. In 49 of these patients, we additionally analyzed hsCRP in blood samples stored from their six-month visit after the transplantation procedure. Furthermore, in a randomized, crossover study, hsCRP was analyzed in 17 male HTRs before and after six weeks of treatment with 20 mg pravastatin.

RESULTS

Median levels of CRP were elevated among patients with CAV compared with those with normal angiograms [3.86 (1.78 to 7.00) vs. 1.08 (0.72 to 2.13) mg/l, p < 0.001]. Prospectively evaluated hsCRP levels from six months to follow-up were significantly higher among those who developed CAV compared with those with normal angiograms [+2.76 (1.56 to 5.00) vs. +0.07 (-0.57 to 0.41) mg/l, p < 0.001]. On multivariate analysis, the increase in hsCRP was the only significant predictor of CAV. Six weeks of treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced hsCRP levels by 25%, without any relation to changes in lipid values.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated plasma levels of CRP are associated with angiographic evidence of CAV, and the increase in hsCRP is a strong predictor of development of CAV. Statin treatment reduces levels of hsCRP and should be used in HTRs, regardless of their lipid levels.

Hemostatic effects of atorvastatin versus simvastatin

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with primary hypercholesterolemia without coronary heart disease were treated with atorvastatin 10-20 mg/d or simvastatin 10-20 mg/d. At baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks, lipid levels such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), and hemostatic parameters such as platelet counts, partial thromboplastin time (PTT) prothrombin time (PT), and fibrinogen levels were measured.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, the doses of the statins were increased to 20 mg/d in 10 of 35 (28.5%) patients treated with atorvastatin and 18 of 26 (69.2%) patients treated with simvastatin when the target level of LDL-C (130 mg/dL) was not reached. Mean doses were atorvastatin 12.8 mg/d and simvastatin 16.9 mg/d. After 24 weeks, 5 patients (14.3%) in the atorvastatin group and 4 patients (15.3%) in the simvastatin group had not reached the goal. In patients with diabetes, target level (LDL-C <100 mg/dL) was not reached in 35.7% of patients in the atorvastatin group and 44.4% of patients in the simvastatin group. Both simvastatin and atorvastatin were effective in lowering TC and LDL-C levels (p < 0.001). Atorvastatin lowered TGs significantly (p < 0.01). Neither atorvastatin nor simvastatin significantly reduced VLDL-C levels. HDL-C levels increased with atorvastatin, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Platelet counts decreased with both statins nonsignificantly. Moreover, fibrinogen levels decreased with simvastatin and atorvastatin, but these reductions were significant only for simvastatin (p < 0.05). We detected prolongation of the PT with both drugs (p < 0.05); however, prolongation of the PTT was significant only with simvastatin (p < 0.001). Effectiveness of both statins on lipid and hemostatic parameters was dose related. Adverse effects were seen in 5 patients (14.2%) treated with atorvastatin and 3 patients (11.5%) treated with simvastatin. Elevations in serum transaminase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal and in creatine phosphokinase >5 times the upper limit of normal were not observed in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin was more effective than simvastatin on lipid parameters, although statistically insignificantly, while simvastatin produced more significant changes than atorvastatin on hemostatic parameters. The mean dose of simvastatin was greater than that of atorvastatin. Both statins had increased effects on lipid and hemostatic parameters when doses were increased. Atorvastatin and simvastatin were well tolerated. Different effects of statins on lipid levels and on coagulation parameters should be considered in patients with hypercholesterolemia and tendency to coagulation, especially in preventing thrombotic events. Further studies in larger trials are needed to confirm these observations.

Effect of atorvastatin and pravastatin on serum C-reactive protein

BACKGROUND

Extra-lipid effects of statins, such as anti-inflammatory actions, may contribute to their clinical benefit. These effects, with important implications for the concept of a statin "class effect," may be drug specific or may be related to the extent of lipid lowering.

METHODS

We randomized 130 patients to treatment with either atorvastatin (80 mg daily, n = 63) or pravastatin (40 mg daily, n = 67), and measured serum lipids, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen at baseline and after 3 months of therapy.

RESULTS

Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly reduced in both groups, with a 36% reduction in the atorvastatin group (0.39 +/- 0.36 to 0.25 +/- 0.27, P =.001) and a 22% reduction observed in the pravastatin group (0.40 +/- 0.33 to 0.31 +/- 0.32, P =.003). A reduced or unchanged CRP level was seen in 67.2% of pravastatin-treated patients (45/67) and 73% of atorvastatin- treated patients (46/63) (P =.47). There was no difference between drugs in either the absolute or relative reductions in CRP levels. However, whereas the reduction of CRP with pravastatin was unrelated to the degree of low-density lipoprotein reduction (r = -.05, P =.69), atorvastatin-induced CRP reductions correlated directly to the change in low-density lipoprotein-C (r =.33, P =.009).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose atorvastatin and pravastatin both reduce CRP levels. However, whereas pravastatin's effect on CRP is independent of lipid-lowering efficacy, these data suggest that lipid-dependent mechanisms are, at least in part, active in atorvastatin-treated patients.

Role of inflammation in cardiovascular disease: how to use C-reactive protein in clinical practice

Acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and sudden death are common complications of a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque. Unstable plaque is a result of multiple factors but is commonly characterized by an infiltrate of inflammatory cells. Medical research strongly supports a role for inflammation in the pathogenesis, progression, and disruption of atherosclerotic plaque. Medical science also has improved our understanding of the complex interactions between our environment and our immune, coagulation, and cardiovascular systems. Clinical studies have demonstrated systemic markers of inflammation to be strong predictors of clinical events, and specific treatments of atherosclerosis and its risk factors have been associated with reductions in inflammatory markers. The authors review the current understanding of the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the common inflammatory markers, and potential anti-inflammatory therapy. Among several potential circulating markers of vascular inflammation, high sensitivity C-reactive protein is best validated and standardized as a marker for cardiovascular risk assessment. Nevertheless, there remain many uncertainties in utilizing C-reactive protein in clinical practice. Here, the authors describe the central role of C-reactive protein in atherosclerosis, review the studies demonstrating predictive value of C-reactive protein, describe the factors requiring consideration when utilizing C-reactive protein, discuss clinical scenarios in which measurement of C-reactive protein may be helpful, and suggest ways to interpret and treat elevated C-reactive protein levels. Finally, the authors summarize future expectations for assessing and modulating the vascular inflammation to inhibit initiation and progression of the atherosclerotic process.

Early vascular benefits of statin therapy

Large-scale trials established that statin administration in hypercholesterolaemic individuals and patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) significantly reduces the risk of vascular events and death. This benefit was primarily attributed to their actions on lipids. This review focuses on the benefits (clinical and experimental) of statins observed soon (approximately 12 weeks) after their administration. Statins rapidly increase nitric oxide production and improve endothelial function (e.g. increased flow-mediated dilatation). Similarly, antioxidant properties decrease the susceptibility of low density lipoprotein cholesterol to oxidation. Statins inhibit the migration of macrophages and smooth muscle cell proliferation leading to an antiproliferative effect and the stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques. Anti-inflammatory effects include a reduction in serum C-reactive protein levels, inflammatory and proinflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, IL-8), adhesion molecules (e.g. ICAM-1, VCAM-1) and other acute phase proteins. Statins influence the haemostatic system. They reduce tissue factor expression and platelet activity, whereas fibrinolysis can be enhanced. Statins improve microalbuminuria, renal function, hypertension and arterial wall stiffness. A significant reduction of the carotid intima media thickness (IMT) was also reported early after statin treatment. These early effects of statins probably contribute to the significant reduction in vascular events seen in some 'short-term' studies. There is a need to further elucidate the rapid and non-lipid lowering properties of statins.

Lack of therapeutic interchangeability of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To review relevant literature and provide an opinion on the class effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins).

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1990-July 2002).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Editorials, studies, and review articles related to the class effect or therapeutic interchangeability of statins were reviewed. Also included was information that is relevant to this topic.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although statins share common main actions, they may have clinically important differences in terms of efficacy and safety. At fixed or allowable dosages, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin produced greater low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects compared with other statins. Some statins have shown reduction in either cardiovascular and/or total mortality. Statins also differ in their structure, pharmacokinetics, potency, and rate of metabolism, any or all of which may have clinical significance. Although inconclusive, subtle differences in nonlipid effects of some statins may have contributed to positive benefits observed in clinical studies. As a result of drug-related deaths, cerivastatin was withdrawn voluntarily from the market, which may raise the question whether there is therapeutic interchangeability (due to class effect) among statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the competition for market share and strategies attempting to identify differences in therapeutic value, few head-to-head comparisons between statins have been performed. The limited, available data suggest that statins are not therapeutically interchangeable.

A rational approach to pathogenesis and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, inflammation, and atherosclerosis

Type 2 diabetes and obesity are major risk factors for the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) and premature atherosclerosis. Both conditions are associated with insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Inflammatory mediators, including plasma interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and tumor necrosis factor R are elevated in these individuals. The elevations of inflammatory mediators may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, because atherosclerosis is an inflammation of the arterial wall. There is evidence that the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of drugs may alleviate some of the adverse atherosclerotic effects common in patients with type 2 diabetes. Considerable recent data suggest that the TZDs possess anti-inflammatory properties and exert an effect on the atherogenic process, including effects on endothelial function, monocyte/macrophage function, lipid abnormalities, smooth muscle cell migration, and fibrinolysis, all functions that are abnormal in the presence of insulin resistance. These actions of TZDs are consistent with the recently described anti-inflammatory effects of insulin. The use of TZDs as potent anti-inflammatory agents in patients with type 2 diabetes is an approach that would normalize glucose levels, as well as potentially alleviate the long-term risk of atherosclerosis.

Postischemic acute renal failure is reduced by short-term statin treatment in a rat model

Postischemic acute renal failure (ARF) is common and often fatal. Cellular mechanisms include cell adhesion, cell infiltration and generation of oxygen free radicals, and inflammatory cytokine production. Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ("statins") directly influence inflammatory mechanisms. The hypothesis that ischemia-induced ARF could be ameliorated with statin treatment was investigated and possible molecular mechanisms were analyzed in a uninephrectomized rat model. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated with cerivastatin (0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle for 3 d. Ischemic ARF was induced by left renal artery clipping for 45 min, while the right kidney was being removed. After 24 h of ARF, serum creatinine levels were increased 7.5-fold in vehicle-treated control animals with ARF, compared with sham-operated animals (P < 0.005). Statin treatment reduced the creatinine level elevation by 40% (P < 0.005). Simultaneously, ischemia-induced severe decreases in GFR were significantly ameliorated by statin treatment (sham operation, 0.95 +/- 0.09 ml/min, n = 13; ischemia without treatment, 0.06 +/- 0.02 ml/min, n = 9; ischemia with statin pretreatment, 0.21 +/- 0.03 ml/min, n = 11; P < 0.001). Furthermore, statin pretreatment prevented the occurrence of tubular necrosis, with marked loss of the brush border, tubular epithelial cell detachment, and tubular obstruction in the S3 segment of the outer medullary stripe. In addition, monocyte and macrophage infiltration was almost completely prevented, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 upregulation was greatly decreased, and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression was reduced. Fibronectin and collagen IV expression was reduced, approaching levels observed in sham-operated animals. In vehicle-treated rats with ARF, mitogen-activated protein kinase extracellular activated kinase-1/2 activity was increased and the transcription factors nuclear factor-kappaB and activator protein-1 were activated. Statin treatment reduced this activation toward levels observed in sham-operated rats. The data suggest that hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition protects renal tissue from the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury and thus reduces the severity of ARF. The chain of events may involve anti-inflammatory effects, with inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and the redox-sensitive transcription factors nuclear factor-kappaB and activator protein-1.

Effects of simvastatin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and serum albumin in hemodialysis patients

A 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor is recommended in hemodialysis (HD) patients with hypercholesterolemia to improve their lipid profiles. We evaluated effects of simvastatin on markers for inflammation, oxidative stress, and coagulation in HD patients. Sixty-two maintenance HD patients with serum cholesterol levels of 200 mg/dL or greater were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31; 8 men, 23 women; age, 63 +/- 11 years) and administered simvastatin, 20 mg/d, for 8 weeks or to the control group (n = 31; 10 men, 21 women; age, 60 +/- 12 years). We measured cholesterol, albumin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), malondialdehyde (MDA; an index of lipid peroxidation), and D-dimer (a marker of intravascular coagulation) in blood at baseline and again at 8 weeks. Fifty-eight of 62 patients completed the study. In the control group, total cholesterol, serum albumin, hs-CRP, MDA, and D-dimer levels did not change. In the treatment group, simvastatin administration for 8 weeks significantly reduced total cholesterol levels from 232 +/- 25 to 165 +/- 39 mg/dL (P < 0.001) and hs-CRP levels from a median of 0.23 mg/dL (range, 0.05 to 1.63 mg/dL) to 0.12 mg/dL (range, <0.006 to 1.45 mg/dL; P < 0.01), whereas it increased serum albumin levels from 3.4 +/- 0.3 to 3.6 +/- 0.4 g/dL (P < 0.001). Administration of simvastatin did not affect MDA and D-dimer levels. These results suggest that in addition to the lipid-lowering effect, simvastatin had an antiinflammatory effect in HD patients. Considering that atherosclerosis is inflammation of the vascular wall, simvastatin may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease, in part because it alleviates inflammation.

High doses of atorvastatin do not affect activity of prothrombinase in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Membrane-dependent coagulation processes play a key role in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), where the generation of thrombin depends on the complex of activated factors X and V (prothrombinase complex) assembled on activated platelets. The aim of the present study was to evaluate prothrombinase activity in patients with ACS and to examine the effect of treatment with 80 mg/day atorvastatin on prothrombinase activity. Blood samples were obtained at admission from 22 patients with ACS, and then again at 2 weeks and at 16 weeks after double-blind randomization to either placebo or atorvastatin. Prothrombinase activity was evaluated by measuring the generation of thrombin by in vitro reconstructed thrombi, and also by measuring plasma levels of prothrombin fragment F1 + 2. Twenty age-matched subjects with stable angina and 11 without coronary disease were used as controls. At admission, prothrombinase activity and F1 + 2 were significantly higher in ACS patients than in controls. Prothrombinase activity was still high at 2 weeks while it returned to normal levels at 16 weeks. F1 + 2 remained high both at 2 and at 16 weeks. Our data indicate that prothrombinase activity is high in patients with ACS, and that it is not affected by high-dose atorvastatin.

Treatment with atorvastatin to the National Cholesterol Educational Program goal versus 'usual' care in secondary coronary heart disease prevention. The GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is very effective in reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, there is no long-term survival study that evaluated this statin.

PATIENTS-METHODS

To assess the effect of atorvastatin on morbidity and mortality (total and coronary) of patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD), 1600 consecutive patients were randomised either to atorvastatin or to 'usual' medical care. The dose of atorvastatin was titrated from 10 to 80 mg/day, in order to reach the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal of LDL-C <100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l). All patients were followed up for a mean period of 3 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary endpoints of the study were defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, revascularisation (coronary morbidity) and stroke. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of the hypolipidaemic drugs as well as the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin.

RESULTS

The mean dosage of atorvastatin was 24 mg/day. This statin reduced total chlesterol by 36%, LDL-C by 46%, triglycerides by 31%, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) by 44%, while it increased HDL-C by 7%; all these changes were significant. The NCEP LDL-C and non-HDL-C treatment goals were reached by 95% (n = 759) and 97% (n = 776), respectively, of patients on atorvastatin. Only 14% of the 'usual' care patients received any hypolipidaemic drugs throughout the study and 3% of them reached the NCEP LDL-C treatment goal. The cost per quaility-adjusted life-year gained with atorvastatin was estimated at $US 8350. During this study 196 (24.5%) CHD patients on 'usual' care had a CHD recurrent event or died vs. 96 (12%) CHD patients on atorvastatin; risk ratio (RR) 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.73, p < 0.0001. In detail, atorvastatin reduced, in comparison to 'usual' care, total mortality (RR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.78, p = 0.0021), coronary mortality (RR 0.53, CI 0.29-0.74, p = 0.0017), coronary morbidity (RR 0.46, CI 0.25-0.71, p < 0.0001), and stroke (RR 0.53, CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.034). All subgroups of patients (women, those with diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, age 60 to 75 years, congestive heart failure, recent unstable angina or prior revascularisation) benefited from treatment with atorvastatin. Withdrawal of patients because of side-effects from the atorvastatin group was low (0.75%) and similar to that of the 'usual' care group (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment of CHD patients with atorvastatin to achieve NCEP lipid targets significantly reduces total and coronary mortality, coronary morbidity and stroke, in comparison to patients receiving 'usual' medical care. Treatment with atorvastatin is well tolerated and cost-effective.

Value or desirability of hemorheological-hemostatic parameter changes as endpoints in blood lipid-regulating trials

High levels of plasma lipids have been recognized as a major risk factor in the development and progression of atherosclerosis, and to influence hemorheological factors that may predispose to thrombotic complications. Lipid-lowering interventions have been associated with a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality. Several mechanisms have been postulated for the observed clinical effect. Serum lipid-regulating therapies may reduce cardiovascular risk not only by altering the arterial wall, improving disturbed endothelial function, atherogenesis and plaque stability, but also through their antithrombogenic effects and influence on blood flow properties associated with hyperlipidemia. In this article, we will review the recent literature and discuss the value of hemorheological-hemostatic findings as surrogate endpoints for clinical trials in dyslipidemic patients.