Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography

Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography

This prospective study compares repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. Fifty-seven consecutive patients (36 women, mean age 61) referred for suspected choledocholithiasis underwent MRCP, followed by EUS. Each procedure was performed by different operators blinded to the results of the other investigation. MR technique included a turbo spin-echo T2-weighted axial sequence with selective fat saturation (SPIR/TSE, TE=70 ms, TR=1,600 ms), followed by coronal dynamic MRCP. The same thick-slab slice was sequentially acquired 12 times as breath-hold single-shot projection imaging (SSh, TE=900 ms, TE=8,000 ms) centred on the common bile duct (CBD). Two experienced radiologists independently and blindly evaluated MR images for the detection of CBD stones. Their inter-observer agreement kappa was determined. Secondly, the two observers read MR images in consensus again. CBD stones were demonstrated in 18 out of 57 patients (31.6 %) and confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP, n=17) or intraoperative cholangiography (n=1). Clinical follow-up served as the "gold standard" in patients with negative results without following invasive procedure (n=28). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value for MRCP resulting from consensus reading were 94.9%, 94.4%, 94.7%, 97.4% and 89.5%, respectively. Corresponding values of EUS were 97.4%, 94.4%, 96.5%, 97.4% and 94.4%. Inter-observer agreement kappa was 0.81. Repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection MRCP is an accurate non-invasive imaging modality for suspected choledocholithiasis and should be increasingly used to select those patients who require a subsequent therapeutic procedure, namely ERCP.

EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

Numerous published studies have shown the high diagnostic performance of both EUS and MRCP compared with ERCP for the detection of choledocholithiasis.

DESIGN

We undertook a systematic review of all published randomized, prospective trials that compared EUS with MRCP with the primary aim being to compare the overall diagnostic accuracy for the detection of choledocholithiasis in patients with suspected biliary disease.

METHODS

A MEDLINE review was performed. We identified 5 randomized, prospective, blinded trials comparing MRCP and EUS for the detection of choledocholithiasis, with subsequent ERCP or intraoperative cholangiography as a criterion standard. The study-specific variables for EUS and MRCP for choledocholithiasis were calculated from the data, and analyses were performed by using aggregated variables (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios).

RESULTS

The pooled data set consisted of 301 patients. The aggregated sensitivities of EUS and MRCP for the detection of choledocholithiasis were 0.93 and 0.85, respectively, whereas their specificities were 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. The aggregated positive predictive values for EUS and MRCP were 0.93 and 0.87, respectively, with the corresponding negative predictive values of 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Positive likelihood ratios were >10 for both tests, and corresponding negative likelihood ratios approached 0.10 for both tests. No statistically significant differences between EUS and MRCP were found in our analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS and MRCP have high diagnostic performance overall. Our analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the modalities. We recommend taking into consideration other factors, such as resource availability, experience, and cost considerations in deciding between these 2 tests.

Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Lithiasis

AIM

The aim of our study was to assess diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones focusing on the capability of this noninvasive method to replace invasive diagnostic procedures in these patients and to limit the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) to the patients who need simultaneous therapeutic intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-shot fast-spin-echo rapid-acquisition thick-section MRC images were obtained in 310 patients recruited into this prospective study. There were 136 male and 174 female patients aged 21-95 years [mean +/- standard deviation (SD) 64.9 +/- 13.6 years]. Patients were subsequently classified into different risk groups (high, moderate, low) according to biochemical abnormalities or morphological features on abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography. Direct cholangiography was the reference method of CBD evaluation.

RESULTS

CBD stones were diagnosed in 115 (37%) patients; 86 of 175 patients in the high-risk group, 24 of 83 patients in the moderate-risk group, and 5 of 50 patients in the low-risk group. In dependent risk groups, the mean CBD caliber was 9.7 +/- 4.5, 7.1 +/- 2.0, and 4.8 +/- 1.2 mm, respectively. The difference was significant between all three groups (P < 0.05). The median size of CBD stones was 7 mm (range 3-21 mm). MRC achieved accuracy and positive and negative predictive values of 97%, 94%, and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRC has a potential to substitute diagnostic ERC in all patients with suspected choledocholithiasis due to its high accuracy, reducing invasive direct cholangiography to patients who require therapeutic intervention.

Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction

Evaluation of suspected biliary tract obstruction is a common clinical problem. Clinical data such as history, physical examination, and laboratory tests can accurately identify up to 90% of patients whose jaundice is caused by extrahepatic obstruction. However, complete assessment of extrahepatic obstruction often requires the use of various imaging modalities to confirm the presence, level, and cause of obstruction, and to aid in treatment plan. In the present summary, the literature on competing technologies including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiopancreatography (PTC), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), helical CT (hCT) and helical CT cholangiography (hCTC) with regards to diagnostic performance characteristics, technical success, safety, and cost-effectiveness is reviewed. Patients with obstructive jaundice secondary to choledocholithiasis or pancreaticobiliary malignancies are the primary focus of this review. Algorithms for the management of suspected obstructive jaundice are put forward based on current evidence. Published data suggest an increasing role for EUS and other noninvasive imaging techniques such as MRCP, and hCT following an initial transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of patients with suspected biliary obstruction to select candidates for surgery or therapeutic ERCP. The management of patients with a suspected pancreaticobiliary condition ultimately is dependent on local expertise, availability, cost, and the multidisciplinary collaboration between radiologists, surgeons, and gastroenterologists.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound in patients at high risk of choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered the nonsurgical gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis (CDL). Complications include a 0.1% to 1.3% mortality rate and a 5% to 19% morbidity rate, including a reported 1.8% to 6.7% incidence of postprocedure pancreatitis. Twenty-seven percent to 67% of ERCPs done for suspected choledocholithiasis ultimately have negative results. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been proposed as an alternate means of diagnosing choledocholithiasis that may eliminate the need for ERCP and its associated morbidities in certain patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified 30 patients who underwent EUS with or without ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis. Reports of all procedures performed were obtained and data were collected on all biliary abnormalities identified on both EUS and ERCP.

RESULTS

Pancreaticobiliary abnormalities were identified in 27 of 30 patients (90%) at EUS. Most common diagnoses included CDL (n = 9, 30%), biliary sludge (n = 11, 37%), pancreatitis (n = 8, 27%), and cholelithiasis (n = 7, 23%). Subsequent ERCP was performed in 14 patients (47%). Indications included a diagnosis of CDL by EUS (n = 9) and abnormal liver function tests (n = 5). CDL was identified in 5 of 14 patients (36%), and microlithiasis/biliary sludge was identified in an additional 5 patients (36%). In 4 patients, CDL was identified by EUS but not by ERCP. ERCP did not identify any new cases of CDL after EUS: of 21 patients without evidence of CDL on EUS, none were subsequently shown to have CDL or to develop any complications related to common duct stones.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS is an effective method of diagnosing CDL. It demonstrates both a high sensitivity and specificity for identifying common bile duct stones. Its use as a screening modality in patients suspected of having CDL may allow more selective use of ERCP.

Preoperative assessment of pancreatic tumors using magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopic ultrasonography, positron emission tomography and laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

The appropriate preoperative evaluation of a pancreatic tumor remains a matter of debate.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated an institutional strategy including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET) and laparoscopy (LAP) for detection and staging of pancreatic tumors suspected to be malignant.

RESULTS

In a consecutive series of 59 patients screened by MRI, PET, EUS and LAP between July 1998 and November 2002, 48 patients were found to bear pancreatic adenocarcinoma and surgery was performed in 27 of them. For tumor detection, the sensitivity of EUS was superior to MRI and PET (98 vs. 87.5 and 87.5%, respectively, p = 0.13). MRI best assessed loco-regional staging, i.e. arterial involvement. For the detection of distant metastases, the sensitivity of all preoperative examinations taken separately was low. When laparotomy was performed with a curative intent according to all four examinations, occult metastasis or carcinomatosis was discovered in 7/27 patients and the overall predictive value of resectability was thus 74%. Five-year and median survival were significantly better in resected vs. non-resected patients (39% and 26 months vs. 0% and 8 months, p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI can be recommended has the first examination in patients bearing pancreatic tumors, complemented by EUS if the findings of MRI are non-conclusive. For detection of distant metastasis, only the combination of all preoperative examination was proved to be more accurate than a single technique.

MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sonography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones in patients with a mild to moderate clinical suspicion of common bile duct stones.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria included acute pancreatitis, subclinical jaundice, and clinical features of common bile duct stone migration. Radial endoscopic sonography and MR cholangiopancreatography with the single-shot fast spin-echo technique were performed a maximum of 48 hr apart. The gold-standard diagnosis was obtained with ERCP (n = 20) or intraoperative cholangiography (n = 14) if the results of endoscopic sonography or MR cholangiopancreatography were abnormal or if a cholecystectomy was performed, or by clinical and biochemical follow-up (n = 11) if the results of endoscopic sonography and MR cholangiopancreatography were normal.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis was common bile duct stones in 16 patients, malignant obstructions in four, and another biliary disease in two (lithiasis migration aspect with papillary edema); 23 patients had no biliary disease. The sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiopancreatography were, respectively, 90.5% and 87.5% for etiologic diagnosis and 87.5% and 96.6% for the detection of common bile duct stones. The corresponding values for endoscopic sonography were 86.4% and 91.3% for etiologic diagnosis and 93.8% and 96.6% for visualization of choledocholithiasis. Accuracy did not significantly differ between the techniques.

CONCLUSION

In cases of mild to moderate suspicion of choledocholithiasis, the accuracies of endoscopic sonography and MR cholangiopancreatography are similar. Because MR cholangiopancreatography is noninvasive, it may be preferred for this indication.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether initial endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is more cost effective than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis of EUS, MRCP and ERCP was performed on 163 patients. The effectiveness of an investigation was defined as the percentage of patients with no need for further evaluation after the investigation in question had been performed. Costs were assumed from the budget-holder's point of view.

RESULTS

MRCP, EUS and ERCP had a total accuracy of 0.91, 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. Eighty-four (52%) patients needed endoscopic therapy in combination with ERCP, giving an effectiveness of MRCP, EUS, and ERCP of 0.44, 0.45 and 0.92, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of MRCP, EUS, and ERCP was 6622, 7353 and 4246 Danish Kroner (DKK) per fully investigated and treated patient (1 DKK=0.14 EUR).

CONCLUSION

Within a patient population with a probability of therapeutic ERCP in 50% of the patients, ERCP was the most cost-effective strategy.

Diagnosing and treating Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a critical literature review and reevaluation

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a pathologic syndrome, without considering etiology, physiopathology, or anatomic aspects of the condition. The clinical manifestations of the syndrome may be a consequence of an "organic stenosis" of the tract or a consequence of "abnormal motility" of the sphincter. Until some years ago, the gold standard technique for studying and treating this pathologic condition was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two criteria for defining patients in the Milwaukee classification are related to this procedure. The Milwaukee classification was introduced to use clinical and radiologic criteria to define patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction to choose the best treatment. Subsequently, great emphasis has been placed on manometry of the sphincter performed by endoscopic cannulation. The enormous increase of cholecystectomies by means of laparoscopic technique has increased the number of patients who return to their reference-surgeon with a post-cholecystectomy pain and possible Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The aim of this paper is to review the literature and to evaluate an up-to-date flow chart for diagnosing and treating the syndrome by using alternative diagnostic procedures that are less invasive than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Surgical clip found in duodenal ulcer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The wide use of surgical clips in laparoscopic surgery has led to a variety of complications. We describe two cases in which a surgical clip was incorporated into a duodenal ulcer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The presenting symptom was acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Both patients were treated endoscopically, and the bleeding stopped after the clip was removed from the ulcer base. Although the mechanism by which a surgical clip migrates into the duodenum is unclear, we recommend meticulous Calot's triangle dissection and removal of any wandering or misplaced clips. Endoscopic removal is recommended when a surgical clip is discovered in a bleeding ulcer.

Is the 'Trondsen Discriminant Function' useful in patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

BACKGROUND

Ideally, patients should only be referred to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) if therapy is indicated. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not the 'Trondsen Discriminant Function' (DF) could be used for selecting patients directly for ERCP.

METHODS

The DF was calculated in 163 patients referred for ERCP with the DF value being unknown to the endoscopist. Compared to the final diagnoses of the patients, the sensitivity and specificity of a positive DF value for predicting biliary obstruction and need of endoscopic therapy were calculated.

RESULTS

Ninety-three (57%) patients had obstruction of the bile duct and 84 (52%) needed endoscopic therapy. A positive DF value had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for predicting biliary obstruction of 81%, 72%, 79% and 73%, respectively. If only patients with a positive DF value had been examined by ERCP, 50 (31%) patients would have been saved from this investigation. Had a negative DF value stopped the patients from further diagnostic evaluation, 18 (11%) would have had undiagnosed pathological conditions.

CONCLUSION

A positive DF value is useful for selecting which patients should be referred directly for ERCP because of a high probability that they will need endoscopic therapy. A negative DF value cannot be used to stop the patient from further diagnostic evaluation.

EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study

BACKGROUND

This prospective study of the use of EUS to prevent unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis has two aims: to evaluate the effectiveness, based on patient outcome, and the potential clinical and economic benefits of EUS.

METHODS

A prospective series of 485 patients (202 men, 283 women; mean age 66.2 years, range 20-94 years) suspected to have choledocholithiasis based on clinical, biochemical, and cross-sectional imaging (US or CT) data underwent EUS. Positive EUS findings were confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy and/or by surgery; negative findings were confirmed by clinical follow-up. An EUS result was considered a true negative if the patient was confirmed symptom-free with normal tests on follow-up of at least 6 months. The costs of EUS (procedure, days of hospitalization, any morbidity) were compared with the estimated costs of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiography avoided in patients with true-negative EUS findings.

RESULTS

EUS findings were verified in 463 patients: EUS diagnosed choledocholithiasis in 239 (51.6%) and the absence of stones in 220 patients. In 4 patients (0.8%), EUS was incomplete. By sphincterotomy (209 patients), surgical bile duct exploration (39), percutaneous cholangiography (1 case in which EUS demonstrated a bile duct tumor), and follow-up (214), EUS diagnoses were confirmed as follows: 237 true-positive, 216 true-negative, 2 false-positive, 4 false-negative, 4 incomplete (sensitivity 98%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 99%, negative predictive value 98%, accuracy 97%). In 214 (46%) patients, more invasive investigations of the bile duct were avoided. The mean cost for patients managed by the EUS-based strategy was ' 374.50 (-284.72), which was significantly less than the theoretical mean cost of ' 443.80 (p < 0.001) for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm that EUS is highly reliable for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Its use offers considerable clinical and economic advantages by preventing inappropriate and more invasive evaluation of the bile duct.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: retrospective comparative evaluation of titanium versus absorbable clips

We present a retrospective study of the use of titanium and absorbable clips during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim was to determine any differences in outcome and costs. From January 1999 to February 2002, 690 patients who had successfully undergone a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reviewed. According to the type of clip, we retrospectively identified two groups of patients: 199 in whom the surgeons had used absorbable clips (absorbable clip group, ACG) and 491 in whom the surgeons had used titanium nonabsorbable clips (titanium clip group, TCG). Data about demographics, operation, results, complications, and follow-up were collected and matched in the two groups. Demographics, concomitant surgery, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status were comparable between the two groups. Although the proportions of cases requiring urgent operation, intraoperative cholangiography, use of a fourth trocar, and use of drainage suction were similar, the difficulty score of the operation was lower (6.3 vs. 7.0, P =.03) and the operative time was shorter (44 vs. 61 minutes, P <.0001) in the ACG than in the TCG. Complications, hospital stay, and long-term results were satisfactory and comparable between the two groups. No correlation was found between clip type and the incidence of biliary tree injuries, bleeding, wound infection, or readmission. The cost of the two types of clips varied slightly (90 euros for each procedure). Despite the fact that absorbable clips are theoretically less likely to cause complications than metallic ones, we were not able to demonstrate any clinical advantage during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in this retrospective study. Furthermore, the results suggest that absorbable clips are preferred when the cholecystectomy presents fewer difficulties.

A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of biliary strictures remains a challenge. This study evaluated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as a new procedure in comparison with the established methods of diagnosis including ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), CT, and EUS.

METHODS

Fifty patients (21 men, 29 women, mean age 65.7 years) with jaundice but no pain suspected to have biliary strictures were enrolled in this prospective study. MRCP, ERCP/PTC, CT, and EUS were performed prospectively; images and videotapes (EUS) of these tests were reviewed blindly under standardized conditions. Reference standards for comparison were surgery, a biopsy confirming malignancy, or the clinical course during follow-up (at least 12 months) in cases without histopathologic proof of malignancy.

RESULTS

Seven patients ultimately proved to have jaundice caused by parenchymal liver disease and 43 had a biliary stricture (17 benign, 26 malignant). Forty patients underwent all 4 imaging tests. There were 10 patients in whom patient-specific problems precluded some procedures but who were included in an intention-to-diagnose analysis. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of malignancy in the 50 patients were as follows: 85% / 75% for ERCP/PTC, 85% / 71% for MRCP, 77% / 63% for CT, and 79% / 62% for EUS, with similar values in the 40 patients who underwent all 4 imaging methods. The combination of MRCP and EUS improved specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MRCP provides the same imaging information as direct cholangiography, it has limited specificity for the diagnosis of malignant strictures. In the differential diagnosis of biliary strictures, several tests including ERCP-guided tissue diagnosis are still required, and MRCP has only a limited clinical role.

The role of endoscopic ultrasound in hepatobiliary disease

The evaluation of hepatobiliary disease continues to change as new technologies are introduced. One of the more recent advances in hepatobiliary imaging has been the application of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, conventional ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging were previously the primary means of evaluating hepatobiliary disease. The role of EUS as both a substitute and a complement for these historical imaging modalities continues to evolve. This review examines the current literature on EUS in the evaluation of hepatobiliary diseases, including choledocholithiasis, microlithiasis, biliary strictures, obstructive jaundice, cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder polyps, and liver lesions.

Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, ERCP has been the only reliable method for imaging the biliary tree, but it is invasive and carries a risk of complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive method for imaging the biliary tree. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of MRCP in a large number of patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred to a teaching hospital for ERCP were eligible for study entry. MRCP was performed within 24 hours before ERCP. MRCP findings were compared with ERCP findings or, when the initial ERCP was unsuccessful, with results of repeat ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, or surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients underwent 149 ERCP/MRCP procedures, of which 129 were evaluable with successful MRCP and ERCP or an ERCP-equivalent study. Diagnoses included choledocholithiasis in 46 and biliary stricture in 12 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for MRCP in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were 97.9%, 89.0%, 83.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. All 12 strictures were diagnosed by MRCP (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

MRCP is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to ERCP for imaging the biliary tree. Choledocholithiasis and biliary strictures can be reliably diagnosed or excluded by MRCP. MRCP should be used increasingly in patients with suspected biliary obstruction to select those who require a therapeutic procedure.

Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model

OBJECTIVES

The role of ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is controversial. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are modalities for bile duct visualization that could lower costs and prevent ERCP-related complications. We analyzed costs and examined the cost-effectiveness of these modalities to define their role in ABP.

METHODS

A decision analysis model of ABP was constructed. The strategies evaluated were 1) ERCP, 2) MRCP followed by ERCP if positive for common bile duct stones (CBDS) or if biliary sepsis ensued, 3) EUS followed by ERCP if positive or if biliary sepsis ensued, and 4) observation with intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy with ERCP only if biliary sepsis ensued. We compared costs and performed cost-effectiveness analysis between strategies at probabilities of CBDS ranging from 0% to 100%. The outcome measures were total costs and costs per ABP death prevented.

RESULTS

At probabilities of CBDS < 15%, observation with intraoperative cholangiography is the least expensive strategy, whereas EUS and ERCP are the least expensive strategies at probabilities of 15-58% and >58%, respectively. In terms of cost-effectiveness, at probabilities of CBDS of 7-45%, EUS is the most cost-effective alternative, and at a probability of >45% ERCP is the most cost-effective option.

CONCLUSIONS

Total costs and cost-effectiveness ratios of these strategies in patients with ABP are highly dependent on the probability of CBDS.

Interventional procedures

During the past year, numerous articles were published on interventional procedures of the stomach, focusing on upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, gastric cancer, gastric outlet obstruction, and benign disease. In the area of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, early endoscopy is warranted for early therapeutic intervention and for triage. In patients with bleeding related to peptic ulcer disease, combination therapy (epinephrine injection in conjunction with electrocoagulation therapy) remains the standard of care. Hemoclipping is a new technique that may be helpful in cases in which conventional therapy fails. Repeat endoscopy should always be considered in patients in whom the first attempt at endoscopic therapy fails. In patients with bleeding related to portal hypertension, prophylactic antibiotics may decrease the risk of infections. Banding remains the therapy of choice for this group of patients. There is no documented benefit for combination therapy (banding and sclerotherapy). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts may be helpful in the treatment of hypertensive portal gastropathy but not gastric vascular ectasias. In the area of gastric cancer, management revolves around staging. This can be accomplished best through the use of CT scan and endoscopic ultrasound. In patients with early limited disease, attempt at endoscopic mucosal resection should be considered. This technique can be performed in a variety of ways: the most common method seems to be through the use of a saline injection, to separate the mucosa-submucosal layer, followed by a cap-assisted snare resection with suction. The safety, efficacy, and outcome of this technique are reviewed. Gastric outlet obstruction remains a difficult problem to treat endoscopically. However, there is some evidence that endoscopic therapy may be successful in benign disease and should be considered prior to surgical intervention.