Endoscopic ultrasonography in the local staging of primary gastric lymphoma

Chemotherapy alone versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for stage I/IIE large-cell lymphoma of the stomach

The optimal treatment of localized large-cell lymphoma of the stomach remains controversial. In particular, the role of surgical resection of the primary tumor needs to be clearly defined. We have reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of gastric lymphoma and treated in our institutions between 1988 and 1998. Patients fulfilling the following criteria were included in this study: (1) histologically proven large-cell lymphoma of the stomach; (2) adequate pathological materials and complete clinical information for analysis; (3) clinical stage I/II disease according to the Musshoff modification of Ann Arbor system; and (4) received primary chemotherapy alone with anthracycline- or anthracenedione-containing regimens (group A) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (group B). There were 38 and 21 patients in group A and group B, respectively. All pertinent clinicopathologic features were similar between the two groups of patients, except that patients of group A had significantly more stage II-2 disease (P = 0.004). Of group A, among 36 patients who could be evaluated for response to chemotherapy, there were 29 complete and 1 partial responses, with an overall response rate of 83.3% (95% CI, 71.1-95.5%). The projected 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 86.0% (95% CI, 73.3-98.7%) and 72.6% (95% CI, 57.0-88.2%), respectively. On the other hand, the projected 5-year RFS and OS of group B were 77.9% (95% CI, 58.0-97.8%) and 77.8% (95% CI, 57.9-97. 7%), respectively, not significantly different from that of group A. Our data suggest that systemic chemotherapy alone may be a reasonable alternative treatment for stage I/II large-cell lymphoma of the stomach. Resection of the primary tumor before systemic chemotherapy does not appear to improve the cure rate of this group of patients.

Chemotherapy alone versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for stage I/IIE large-cell lymphoma of the stomach

The optimal treatment of localized large-cell lymphoma of the stomach remains controversial. In particular, the role of surgical resection of the primary tumor needs to be clearly defined. We have reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of gastric lymphoma and treated in our institutions between 1988 and 1998. Patients fulfilling the following criteria were included in this study: (1) histologically proven large-cell lymphoma of the stomach; (2) adequate pathological materials and complete clinical information for analysis; (3) clinical stage I/II disease according to the Musshoff modification of Ann Arbor system; and (4) received primary chemotherapy alone with anthracycline- or anthracenedione-containing regimens (group A) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (group B). There were 38 and 21 patients in group A and group B, respectively. All pertinent clinicopathologic features were similar between the two groups of patients, except that patients of group A had significantly more stage II-2 disease (P = 0.004). Of group A, among 36 patients who could be evaluated for response to chemotherapy, there were 29 complete and 1 partial responses, with an overall response rate of 83.3% (95% CI, 71.1-95.5%). The projected 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 86.0% (95% CI, 73.3-98.7%) and 72.6% (95% CI, 57.0-88.2%), respectively. On the other hand, the projected 5-year RFS and OS of group B were 77.9% (95% CI, 58.0-97.8%) and 77.8% (95% CI, 57.9-97. 7%), respectively, not significantly different from that of group A. Our data suggest that systemic chemotherapy alone may be a reasonable alternative treatment for stage I/II large-cell lymphoma of the stomach. Resection of the primary tumor before systemic chemotherapy does not appear to improve the cure rate of this group of patients.

Endosonography in gastric lymphoma and large gastric folds

To establish a correct preoperative differential diagnosis between gastric lymphoma and cancer is essential but can be difficult as endoscopic biopsies can sometimes provide a low diagnostic yield. By EUS, infiltrative carcinoma tends to show a vertical growth in the gastric wall, while lymphoma tends to show mainly a horizontal extension. EUS provides an accurate staging of gastric lymphoma, showing the exact level of infiltration and the presence of perigastric lymph nodes, thus the physician can obtain an accurate prognosis for each patient and select the best form of treatment accordingly. The response to chemoradiotherapy can also be investigated very accurately by EUS. Large gastric folds are seen in a great number of benign and malignant conditions. Diagnosis represents a clinical challenge because etiology may be extremely varied and standard biopsies are often inconclusive. Different diseases show different levels of infiltration of the gastric wall, thus a characteristic echo-pattern helps for the differential diagnosis. Endosonography, used always in combination with biopsy, allows to rule out malignancies and to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient (medical or surgical).

Management and long-term results of surgery for localized gastric lymphomas

BACKGROUND

High- and low-grade gastric lymphomas (GL) differ in their behavior and chemosensitivity. Surgery has to be reevaluated according to the histologic grade of malignancy. We aimed to assess the place of surgery in the management of GL and its results after long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Among 54 patients with primary GL prospectively enrolled from 1984 to 1990, 45 with localized disease were studied. Primary resection was done whenever safe. All patients received chemotherapy adapted to the grade of malignancy and/or to the completeness of the resection.

RESULTS

Among 18 low- and 27 high-grade GL, 35 patients had primary resections; of those, 23 were complete. The complete response rate for all patients with low- and high-grade GL was 67% and 89%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 8 years, the disease-free survival rates for low-grade GL and high-grade GL were 94% and 89%, respectively. It was better after complete resection.

CONCLUSION

Complete resection is a major determinant of prolonged complete remission.

Gastric lymphomas: aspects of follow-up and after-care

In recent years, new insights into gastric lymphomas and their etiology and pathogenesis have been gained. The predominant role of infection with Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis as a pre-malignant condition of a special lymphoma entity [gastric lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type], has defined new diagnostic procedures and concepts of treatment. Therefore, prognostic factors (e.g. stage of lymphoma, histopathologic grading, resectability etc.) are extremely important for the intensity and efficacy of follow-up and after-care. Surveillance programs in gastric lymphoma include sequelae of surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and the efficacy of follow-up procedures have to be measured by the prevention of tumor relapse in comparison to the intensity of diagnostic procedures. Since lymphoma relapse may occur both as local or disseminated recurrence in 13%-35% of cases, follow-up procedures have to regard both aspects during surveillance. While these follow-up programs are standardized in epithelial tumors (e.g. colon carcinoma), they are not yet established or comparable for each type of gastric lymphoma. Low-grade MALT lymphomas have to be considered as a new lymphoma entity. In addition, new diagnostic procedures (e.g. molecular parameters such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for clonality, endosonography, "gastric mapping") have been found to be important parameters for diagnosis and staging of gastric lymphoma and may therefore be relevant for the course of the disease. The definition of "lymphoma cure" and the impact of these procedures as prognostic factors will have to be discussed and may influence the follow-up of gastric lymphoma.

Surgery plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone for primary intermediate- and high-grade gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience

Primary gastric lymphomas (PGL) have traditionally been treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Surgery was thought to improve staging, optimise local disease control and reduce risk of perforation or bleeding, but recent studies question its role. In this study, patients with intermediate- or high-grade PGL who received chemotherapy from 1985 to 1996 at the Royal Marsden Hospital were identified using a prospectively accrued database. A total of 37 patients (6 with low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT-L), 9 with high-grade MALT-L, 20 with diffuse large B-cell (DLBC) lymphoma and 2 other histologies), 17 of whom had localised disease, were treated with either surgery plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. 5-year overall survival for localised and advanced PGL was 94 and 50%, respectively, with no differences between the two treatments over a 53 months median follow-up. No perforations or serious bleeding occurred. Surgery is associated with important morbidity and we detected no benefit of surgery prior to chemotherapy in this limited series of patients.

Treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma by Helicobacter pylori eradication: a study controlled by endoscopic ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have demonstrated a link between Helicobacter pylori infection and low grade B-cell gastric MALT lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication in 17 patients with low grade B-cell gastric MALT lymphoma stage EI.

METHODS

For disease staging EUS and CT scan were systematically performed. Eight patients were excluded from the present series because stage EII disease was diagnosed. To demonstrate B-cell monoclonality, immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction were used. H. pylori eradication was performed with triple therapy.

RESULTS

H. pylori was eradicated in all patients after first (n = 15) or second line (n = 2) treatment. Histologic regression of lymphoma was observed in all patients after a median period of 2 mo. Disappearance of monoclonality according to polymerase chain reaction took significantly longer (7 mo). At the end of the study, four of 16 patients still exhibited persistent monoclonal bands. Relapse of lymphoma occurred in two patients associated with H. pylori reinfection/recrudescence.

CONCLUSION

Eradication of H. pylori seems to be an effective therapy in patients with stage EI gastric MALT lymphoma, although long-term results are still uncertain. Endoscopic ultrasonography is useful for a more accurate staging of the disease. The clinical significance of detecting monoclonality by polymerase chain reaction remains to be determined.

Hodgkin's disease diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of a periduodenal lymph node

Hodgkin's disease rarely presents as obstructive jaundice. We report a case of Hodgkin's disease arising in periduodenallymph nodes, presenting with biliary obstruction, definitively diagnosed on cytologic material obtained by endosonographically-guided real-time fine needle aspiration biopsy and confirmed at laparotomy. The medical literature pertaining to the use of endosonography and fine needle aspiration biopsy for pancreatic lesions and abdominal lymphoma is reviewed. Currently available data support the use of fine needle aspiration biopsy in establishing the diagnosis of lymphoma. This case highlights the utility of endoscopic ultrasonography with endosonographically guided real-time fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosing and managing patients with extrahepatic biliary obstruction or suspected abdominal lymphoma. Pairing endosonographically guided real-time fine needle aspiration biopsy with on-site cytologic assessment and immediate specimen triage can lead to definitive diagnosis of abdominal lymphoma, avoiding surgical intervention in many cases.

Endoscopic ultrasonography for the initial staging and follow-up in patients with low-grade gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue treated medically

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasonography is an appropriate procedure to assess the depth of tumoral infiltration in primary gastric lymphoma. The aims of the present study were to characterize the endoscopic ultrasonographic aspects of low-grade gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and to determine the value of this procedure in medical treatment assessment.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 1996, 15 patients with low-grade gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue were treated with oral cyclophosphamide and/or anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment. Endoscopic ultrasonography was carried out at the time of the diagnosis in all patients, 8 of whom (4 in complete remission and 4 with a stable or progressive disease) had at least one endoscopic ultrasonography examination within the treatment period (median follow-up 17 months).

RESULTS

The initial procedure showed an increased gastric wall thickness from 6 to 12 mm in 8 patients, equal to 5 mm in 5 patients, and normal in 2 patients. The thickening was predominantly of the mucosa alone and/or the submucosa but never extended beyond the muscularis propria. No lymph node was found. Gastric wall thickness returned to normal in the 4 patients in complete remission and remained thick in 3 of the 4 patients with a stable or progressive disease. Of these 3 patients, at least one set of biopsy samples, carried out during follow-up, showed the absence of lymphoma, but histology performed subsequently found evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ultrasonography differentiates superficial from infiltrative types of gastric lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, which may have a prognostic significance and confirms remission or persistence of the disease with medical treatment during follow-up. When the gastric wall remains thick, even if histology is negative, repeated biopsies should be performed to detect evolving disease or relapse.

Gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps: endoscopic ultrasonographic analysis in comparison with the histology

BACKGROUND

Histologic diagnosis of inflammatory fibroid polyp is usually difficult on routine endoscopic examinations. The aim of this study was to describe endoscopic ultrasonographic features of gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps.

METHODS

Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 10 patients with gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps before resection. All lesions were resected by either endoscopic removal or gastrectomy and then confirmed histologically as inflammatory fibroid polyps. To evaluate the diagnostic value of endosonography, endoscopic ultrasonographic images of the lesions were analyzed and compared with resected specimens retrospectively.

RESULTS

All lesions were located in the second and/or third sonographic layer of the gastric wall without involvement of the fourth layer. The most frequent endoscopic ultrasonographic features were an indistinct margin (90%), and a hypoechoic (80%), homogeneous (90%) echo pattern. Histologically, inflammatory fibroid polyps developed in the deep mucosa and/or submucosa by proliferation of fibrous tissue, but did not have a capsule.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristic endoscopic ultrasonographic attributes of gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps are indistinct margin, hypoechogenicity, homogeneous appearance, and location within the second and/or third layer. These findings correlate very closely to the histologic findings.

Primary tumour staging of gastric and colorectal cancer

Almost 15 years after its introduction, endosonography or endoscopic ultrasonography is an important technique in a wide range of gastrointestinal diseases. Other imaging techniques are CT, MRI and barium examination. There is a general consensus that the most important prognostic factor in gastric and colorectal carcinoma is the presence or absence of lymph node invasion, but malignant fixation of tumour through direct invasion of adjacent tissues also appears to be very important. Non-invasive preoperative assessment of tumour stage based on one or a combination of the above imaging modalities should allow appropriate treatment to be planned in each case.

Exploring the role of endosonography

Endosonography (ES) or endoscopic ultrasonography has undergone very rapid development and has now become an important imaging technique for gastroenterologists all over the world. Endosonography is currently used in a wide field of gastrointestinal diseases, most of which are in the upper gastrointestinal tract. This small tour will take you through the forest of indications in endosonography, focusing on staging of malignancies. The tour will stop at the most common indications for ES, briefly summarizing the current state of affairs and taking a short look into the future.

Ultrasonography of the human stomach

Improved technology and new systems have expanded the possibilities of using ultrasound in clinical gastroenterology.

METHODS

Conventional real-time ultrasound was applied to the stomach in order to study motor activity and accommodation to meals. The antrum was imaged by various modalities of two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography, while duplex sonography was used for studying transpyloric flow. Miniature ultrasound probes and echo-endoscopes were employed for endoscopic ultrasound

RESULTS

The examinations provided new information about contractions, distension, co-ordination of movements, and flow. Patients with functional dyspepsia were characterized by rapid emptying of the proximal stomach, wide gastric antrum, early commencement of transpyloric flow, and epigastric discomfort following ingestion of a meat soup. Endoscopic ultrasonography exposed detailed images of the gastric wall and adjacent structures of great importance in clinical decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

The new ultrasound methods have improved our diagnostic capabilities and opened new promising possibilities for further research in the field of motility.

Current endosonographic possibilities in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Almost 15 years after its introduction endosonography is an important technique in a wide range of gastrointestinal diseases. Two types of dedicated echoendoscopes are commercially available each with their own advantages. Thinner instruments with higher resolutions, that will go through a normal endoscope are currently in development. With these probes differentiation between T1 and T in situ will be possible in the near future. Characterization of 'submucosal' lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract is a field in which ES is the most reliable technique for determining the origin of these lesions. Also submucosal vessels are easily visualized and ES is acquiring an important role in the investigation of portal hypertension. ES is the most accurate staging technique for oesophageal and gastric carcinoma as well as for gastric lymphoma. T- and N-staging results are superior to CT scanning, although ES is not very reliable in individual lymph nodes. Therefore a lot of effort is put into obtaining cytological samples from lesions outside the gastrointestinal tract. It is now possible to get cytological proof of mediastinal lymph nodes through ES-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. It seems that low grade malignant gastric lymphomas show a typical picture on ES, which may help in selecting treatment. The future will bring us higher resolution images and three-dimensional reconstruction is already being investigated. This last technique will probably become a standard preoperative investigation in oesophageal carcinoma before the century is over.