Heparin Resistance - Clinical Perspectives and Management Strategies

Optimal management of cardiac surgery patients using direct oral anticoagulants: recommendations for clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

Literature is scarce on the management of patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) undergoing elective, urgent and emergency surgery. Therefore, we summarize the current evidence and provide literature-based recommendations for the management of patients on DOACs in the perioperative phase.

METHODS

A general literature review was conducted on the pharmacology of DOACs and for recommendations on the management of cardiac surgical patients on DOACs. Additionally, we performed a systematic review for studies on the use of direct DOAC reversal agents in the emergency cardiac surgical setting.

RESULTS

When surgery is elective, the DOAC cessation strategy is relatively straightforward and should be adapted to the renal function. The same approach applies to urgent cases, but additional DOAC activity drug level monitoring tests may be useful. In emergency cases, idarucizumab can be safely administered to patients on dabigatran in any of the perioperative phases. However, andexanet alfa, which is not registered for perioperative use, should not be administered in the preoperative phase to reverse the effect of factor Xa inhibitors, as it may induce temporary heparin resistance. Finally, the administration of (activated) prothrombin complex concentrate may be considered in all patients on DOACs, and such concentrates are generally readily available.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs offer several advantages over vitamin K antagonists, but care must be taken in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Although elective and urgent cases can be managed relatively straightforwardly, the management of emergency cases requires particular attention.

Aspirin is a safe and effective thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at high risk for thromboembolic events compared to non-surgical patients. Both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents are used as antithrombotic prophylaxis in TKA. The aim of this review is to understand the role of aspirin in the prevention of thromboembolic events and to compare its efficacy and safety with the main anticoagulants used in antithromboembolic prophylaxis in TKA.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Registry to evaluate studies that compared aspirin with other anticoagulants, in terms of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after TKA. The meta-analysis compared the rate of complications between aspirin and other anticoagulants.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review for a total of 163,983 patients, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences between aspirin and other anticoagulants in terms of the rate of deep venous thrombosis (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.08, p = 0.35) and pulmonary embolism (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.56-1.41, p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin is safe, effective, and not inferior to other main anticoagulants in preventing thromboembolic events following TKA.

Anticoagulation strategies in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A network meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) plays an important role in providing temporary life support for patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure, but requires strict anticoagulation and monitoring. This network meta-analysis systematically explored the most effective anticoagulation and monitoring strategies for patients receiving ECMO.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to January 31, 2023, for studies comparing unfractionated heparin (UFH), argatroban (Arg), bivalirudin (Biv), and/or nafamostat mesylate (NM) in patients receiving ECMO. The primary outcomes included device-related thrombosis, patient-related thrombosis, and major bleeding events. The secondary outcomes included ECMO survival, ECMO duration, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2522 patients from 23 trials were included in the study. Biv was associated with a decreased risk of device-related thrombosis (odd ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33-0.84) compared with UFH, whereas NM (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 0.24-65.0) and Arg (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.43-2.0) did not reduce the risk of device-related thrombosis compared with UFH. Biv was superior to Arg in decreasing the risk of device-related thrombosis (OR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.51). Biv reduced the risk of patient-related thrombosis compared with UFH (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.18-0.85); NM (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.14-3.3) and Arg (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 0.94-12.0) did not decrease risk of patient-related thrombosis compared with UFH. No significant difference was observed in the risk of major bleeding between three alternatives and UFH: Biv (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.23-1.3), Arg (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 0.34-5.8), and NM (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.13-2.6). NM showed a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality compared with UFH (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.091-0.77), whereas Arg (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.15-1.2) and Biv (OR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52-1.1) did not decrease risk of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with UFH and Arg, Biv reduces the risk of thrombosis and appears to be a better choice for patients requiring ECMO. NM was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality.

1-Minute Pearls/Pitfalls for the Clinician

Antibiotic-associated encephalopathy and heparin resistance are sometimes seen in hospitalized patients. This article describes some pearls/pitfalls pertinent to these conditions.

Antithrombin concentrates may benefit cardiopulmonary bypass patients with suspected heparin resistance: A retrospective analysis of real-world data

Background

Heparin resistance is a common complication of surgical patients requiring anticoagulation, such as those undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Treatments to address heparin resistance include supplementation of antithrombin (AT) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). This retrospective database analysis compared key outcomes in suspected heparin-resistant patients undergoing CPB treated with AT or FFP.

Methods

De-identified United States electronic health records (Cerner Health Facts®) were queried. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9/10) codes were used to determine CPB procedures and FFP administration. AT administration was identified using medication data, while a combination of lab and medication data examining activated clotting times detected heparin resistance in FFP patients. Adult inpatients (≥18 years old) seen between 2001 and 2018 were included. Differences in mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital-free days (using a 30-day post-discharge period) were assessed with univariate models as well as adjusted logistic regression models controlling for patient characteristics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores.

Results

Of the 502 patients identified, 247 received AT and 255 received FFP. The FFP cohort was associated with a higher CCI compared to the AT cohort (3.3 ± 2.4 vs. 2.3 ± 2.0, P < .001). The AT cohort was associated with a 71% (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.29, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: P = .003) and 66% (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: P = .01) reduction in mortality when compared to FFP using univariate and adjusted logistic regression models, respectively. Similarly, use of AT also showed a 22% shorter ICU LOS (P = .02) and 10% more hospital-free days in the 30 days following discharge (P = .004) according to the univariate models, though statistical significance was absent within adjusted models in both ICU LOS (P = .08) and hospital-free days (P = .53).

Conclusions

Compared to FFP, AT use suggests a reduction in the odds of mortality in suspected heparin-resistant patients undergoing CPB, though larger prospective studies are necessary to elucidate potential differences in hospital-free days or ICU LOS across treatment modalities.

Paraprotein associated heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass

INTRODUCTION

Heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass poses a significant intraoperative dilemma. Antithrombin deficiency related heparin resistance is well described, but less common causes are still poorly understood and inadequately managed.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass in a gentleman with no previous haematological history or thrombotic risk factors. The patient required three times the regular dose of unfractionated heparin to achieve acceptable conditions to initiate and maintain bypass. The patient was found to have elevated serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) kappa paraprotein on post-operative investigation.

DISCUSSION

Paraproteins may exhibit non-specific binding to long polymeric chains of unfractionated heparin and inhibits the interaction between heparin and antithrombin. As a result, excessive doses of heparin are required to overcome this, which increases the risk of perioperative bleeding and other complications.

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum paraprotein levels should be recognised as a cause of heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass.

The Management of COVID-19-Related Coagulopathy: A Focus on the Challenges of Metabolic and Vascular Diseases

The course of COVID-19 is highly dependent on the associated cardiometabolic comorbidities of the patient, which worsen the prognosis of coronavirus infection, mainly due to systemic inflammation, endothelium dysfunction, and thrombosis. A search on the recent medical literature was performed in five languages, using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, for the review of data regarding the management of patients with a high risk for severe COVID-19, focusing on the associated coagulopathy. Special features of COVID-19 management are presented, based on the underlying conditions (obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases), emphasizing the necessity of a modern, holistic approach to thromboembolic states. The latest findings regarding the most efficient therapeutic approaches are included in the article, offering guidance for medical professionals in severe, complicated cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We can conclude that severe COVID-19 is closely related to vascular inflammation and intense cytokine release leading to hemostasis disorders. Overweight, hyperglycemia, cardiovascular diseases, and old age are important risk factors for severe outcomes of coronavirus infection, involving a hypercoagulable state. Early diagnosis and proper therapy in complicated SARS-CoV-2-infected cases could reduce mortality and the need for intensive care during hospitalization in patients with cardiometabolic comorbidities.

Relationship between estimated and observed heparin sensitivity indices in cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Little evidence exists on the relationship between the estimated heparin sensitivity index (HSI) based on commonly available clinical and laboratory data and observed HSI in the adult population. This retrospective study assessed the relationship between the observed and estimated HSIs.

METHODS

This study was conducted in an academic, single-institution setting. Patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent cardiac and thoracic aortic surgery and requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were included. Clinical and laboratory data, including age, sex, and platelet count, were collected. The fibrinogen-albumin ratio index was calculated by dividing the fibrinogen value by the albumin value, multiplied by 10.The HSI was calculated using the formula: (activated clotting time after initial heparin administration-baseline activated clotting time)/initial heparin dose (IU/kg). The estimated HSI was based on the results of multiple regression analysis that included clinically relevant factors. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the observed and estimated HSIs was used to assess.

RESULTS

In total, 560 patients with valid activated clotting time (ACT) values after initial heparin administration were included in the final analysis to explore associated factors using the estimated HSI. Multiple regression analysis revealed that hemodialysis, platelet count, fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio index, baseline activated clotting time, and initial heparin dose were significantly associated with the HSI. The mean (standard deviation) observed and estimated HSIs were 1.38 (0.43) and 1.55 (0.13), respectively, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.10.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between the observed and estimated HSIs was low, and a formula with high accuracy for estimating the HSI is needed.

Applications of rotational thromboelastometry in heparin monitoring in critical COVID-19 disease: Observations in the Maastricht Intensive Care COVID cohort

Background

Critically ill COVID-19 patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Therefore, they receive thromboprophylaxis and, when appropriate, therapeutic unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). To monitor heparins in COVID-19 disease, whole-blood rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) may be a promising alternative to the aPTT and anti-Xa assays.

Objective

To evaluate the ROTEM INTEM/HEPTEM ratios in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients treated with UFH and therapeutic LMWH.

Material and methods

A subcohort of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients of the prospective Maastricht Intensive Care Covid (MaastrICCht) cohort was studied. Anti-Xa, aPTT, and ROTEM measurements following treatment with UFH or therapeutic dose of LMWH (nadroparin) were evaluated using uni- and multivariable linear regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics.

Results

A total of 98 patients were included, of which 82 were treated with UFH and 16 with therapeutic LMWH. ROTEM-measured INTEM/HEPTEM CT ratio was higher in patients using UFH (1.4 [1.3-1.4]) compared to patients treated with LMWH (1.0 [1.0-1.1], p < 0.001). Both the aPTT and anti-Xa were associated with the CT ratio. However, the β-regression coefficient (95%CI) was significantly higher in patients on UFH (0.31 (0.001-0.62)) compared to therapeutic LMWH (0.09 (0.05-0.13)) for comparison with the anti-Xa assay. Furthermore, ROC analysis demonstrated an area under the curve for detecting UFH of 0.936(0.849-1.00), 0.851(0.702-1.000), and 0.645(0.465-0.826) for the CT ratio, aPTT, and anti-Xa, respectively.

Conclusion

The ROTEM INTEM/HEPTEM CT ratio appears a promising tool to guide anticoagulant therapy in ICU patients with COVID-19 disease, but associations with clinical endpoints are currently lacking.

What's fishy about protamine? Clinical use, adverse reactions, and potential alternatives

Protamine, a highly basic protein isolated from salmon sperm, is the only clinically available agent to reverse the anticoagulation of unfractionated heparin. Following intravenous administration, protamine binds to heparin in a nonspecific electrostatic interaction to reverse its anticoagulant effects. In clinical use, protamine is routinely administered to reverse high-dose heparin anticoagulation in cardiovascular procedures, including cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Despite the lack of supportive evidence regarding protamine's effectiveness to reverse low-molecular-weight heparin, it is recommended in guidelines with low-quality evidence. Different dosing strategies have been reported for reversing heparin in cardiac surgical patients based on empiric dosing, pharmacokinetics, or point-of-care measurements of heparin levels. Protamine administration is associated with a spectrum of adverse reactions that range from vasodilation to life-threatening cardiopulmonary dysfunction and shock. The life-threatening responses appear to be hypersensitivity reactions due to immunoglobulin E and/or immunoglobulin G antibodies. However, protamine and heparin-protamine complexes can activate complement inflammatory pathways and inhibit other coagulation factors. Although alternative agents for reversing heparin are not currently available for clinical use, additional research continues evaluating novel therapeutic approaches.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Essential Thrombocythemia: A Case Report Describing Perioperative Management in Open Surgery

We report perioperative management and open surgery to treat a case of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with essential thrombocythemia (ET), a chronic myeloproliferative disorder associated with arterial or venous thrombosis, idiopathic bleeding, and heparin-resistant diathesis. Following careful preoperative management, including assessment of heparin resistance, open surgery was successfully performed to treat the aortic aneurysm of our patient. This report shows that optimal preparation for surgery is important to safely perform abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and prevent perioperative thrombosis and bleeding in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm with ET.

Membrane oxygenator longevity was higher in argatroban-treated patients undergoing vvECMO

BACKGROUND

In severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) can be a lifesaver. However, anticoagulation therapy is mandatory because the nonendothelial extracorporeal surface increases the risk of thromboembolic problems. Heparin is still the most common anticoagulant, but argatroban could be an alternative. This work investigates whether argatroban offers a therapeutic advantage over heparin during vvECMO.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vvECMO for severe ARDS and received heparin or argatroban as anticoagulation therapy. Demographic variables, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment and outcome parameters were evaluated. The primary outcome parameter was the operating time of the membrane oxygenator normalized to the duration of vvECMO treatment. Secondary outcome parameters were transfusion requirements normalized to the duration of vvECMO therapy.

RESULTS

Fifty seven patients from January 2019 to February 2021 underwent vvECMO and were included in this study. Thirty three patients received heparin and 24 patients argatroban as anticoagulatory therapy. The groups did not differ in demographics, ICU scoring systems, or comorbidities. Platelet counts and partial prothrombin time did not differ between the two groups during the first 6 days of vvECMO. The argatroban group had lower requirements for red blood cells, platelets and fresh frozen plasma. The mean runtime of the individual membrane oxygenator increased from 12.3 days (heparin group) to 16.6 days in the argatroban group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that argatroban can be considered as anticoagulant during vvECMO.

Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT): expert opinion from the SIAARTI-SIN joint commission

Renal replacement therapies (RRT) are essential to support critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), providing control of solutes, fluid balance and acid-base status. To maintain the patency of the extracorporeal circuit, minimizing downtime periods and blood losses due to filter clotting, an effective anticoagulation strategy is required.Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been introduced in clinical practice for continuous RRT (CRRT) in the early 1990s and has had a progressively wider acceptance in parallel to the development of simplified systems and safe protocols. Main guidelines on AKI support the use of RCA as the first line anticoagulation strategy during CRRT in patients without contraindications to citrate and regardless of the patient's bleeding risk.Experts from the SIAARTI-SIN joint commission have prepared this position statement which discusses the use of RCA in different RRT modalities also in combination with other extracorporeal organ support systems. Furthermore, advise is provided on potential limitations to the use of RCA in high-risk patients with particular attention to the need for a rigorous monitoring in complex clinical settings. Finally, the main findings about the prospective of optimization of RRT solutions aimed at preventing electrolyte derangements during RCA are discussed in detail.

Anticoagulation in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committees on Perioperative and Critical Care Haemostasis and Thrombosis of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Anticoagulation of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is challenging because of a high risk of both bleeding and thrombotic complications, and often empirical. Practice in anticoagulation management is therefore highly variable. The scope of this guidance document is to provide clinicians with practical advice on the choice of an anticoagulant agent, dosing, and the optimal anticoagulant monitoring strategy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in adult patients.

Current and future strategies to monitor and manage coagulation in ECMO patients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide life-saving support for critically ill patients suffering severe respiratory and/or cardiac failure. However, thrombosis and bleeding remain common and complex problems to manage. Key causes of thrombosis in ECMO patients include blood contact to pro-thrombotic and non-physiological surfaces, as well as high shearing forces in the pump and membrane oxygenator. On the other hand, adverse effects of anticoagulant, thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and hyperfibrinolysis are all established as causes of bleeding. Finding safe and effective anticoagulants that balance thrombosis and bleeding risk remains challenging. This review highlights commonly used anticoagulants in ECMO, including their mechanism of action, monitoring methods, strengths and limitations. It further elaborates on existing anticoagulant monitoring strategies, indicating their target range, benefits and drawbacks. Finally, it introduces several highly novel approaches to real-time anticoagulation monitoring methods including sound, optical, fluorescent, and electrical measurement as well as their working principles and future directions for research.

Inhibition of platelet-surface-bound proteins during coagulation under flow II: Antithrombin and heparin

Blood coagulation is a self-repair process regulated by activated platelet surfaces, clotting factors, and inhibitors. Antithrombin (AT) is one such inhibitor that impedes coagulation by targeting and inactivating several key coagulation enzymes. The effect of AT is greatly enhanced in the presence of heparin, a common anticoagulant drug. When heparin binds to AT, it either bridges with the target enzyme or induces allosteric changes in AT leading to more favorable binding with the target enzyme. AT inhibition of fluid-phase enzymes caused little suppression of thrombin generation in our previous mathematical models of blood coagulation under flow. This is because in that model, flow itself was a greater inhibitor of the fluid-phase enzymes than AT. From clinical observations, it is clear that AT and heparin should have strong inhibitory effects on thrombin generation, and thus we hypothesized that AT could be inhibiting enzymes bound to activated platelet surfaces that are not subject to being washed away by flow. We extended our mathematical model to include the relevant reactions of AT inhibition at the activated platelet surfaces as well as those for unfractionated heparin and a low molecular weight heparin. Our results show that AT alone is only an effective inhibitor at low tissue factor densities, but in the presence of heparin, it can greatly alter, and in some cases shut down, thrombin generation. Additionally, we studied each target enzyme separately and found that inactivation of no single enzyme could substantially suppress thrombin generation.

An Overview of Heparin Monitoring with the Anti-Xa Assay

Heparin remains a critical therapy in hospitalized patients requiring anticoagulation. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) mediates its therapeutic effect by binding to antithrombin (AT) and inhibiting thrombin and FXa, as well as other serine proteases. Because of its complex pharmacokinetics, monitoring UFH therapy is required, which is usually achieved with either the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) or the anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is fast replacing UFH, as it has a more predictable response, negating the need for routine monitoring in most cases. When required, the anti-Xa assay is used for monitoring of LMWH. The APTT has many notable limitations when used for heparin therapeutic monitoring, including biologic, preanalytical, and analytical issues. With its increasing availability, the anti-Xa assay is appealing as it is less affected by patient factors (e.g., acute-phase reactants, lupus anticoagulants, consumptive coagulopathies), known to interfere with the APTT. The anti-Xa assay has shown additional benefits, such as faster time to achieve therapeutic levels, more consistent therapeutic levels, less dose adjustments, and, overall, less tests performed during therapy. However, poor interlaboratory agreement has been observed among anti-Xa reagents, highlighting that further work needs to be done to standardize this assay for use in patient heparin monitoring.

Anesthetic management of patients undergoing cardiac myxoma resection: a single-center retrospective analysis

Background

Myxomas are the most common primary cardiac tumors. Intracardiac myxomas, although benign, could cause serious consequences such as tricuspid or mitral valve obstruction, hemodynamic collapse, and acute heart failure, which pose challenges during anesthetic management. The current study was designed to summarize the anesthetic management of patients undergoing cardiac myxoma resection.

Methods

This study was performed retrospectively from the perioperative period of patients who underwent myxoma resection. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the myxoma prolapsed into the ventricle (group O) or not (group N) to evaluate the impact of tricuspid or mitral valve with obstruction.

Results

110 patients, aged 17-78 years, undergoing cardiac myxoma resection between January 2019 and December 2021 were collected, and their perioperative characteristics were recorded. In the preoperative evaluation, common clinical symptoms included dyspnea and palpitation, whereas embolic events occurred in 8 patients, including 5 (4.5%) cerebral thromboembolic events, 2 (1.8%) femoral artery, and 1 (0.9%) obstructive coronary artery. According to the echocardiography, left atrial myxoma was detected in 104 (94.5%) patients, the average dimension of myxoma was 4.03 cm ± 1.52 cm in the largest diameter, and 48 patients were divided into group O. During intraoperative anesthetic management, hemodynamic instability occurred in 38 (34.5%) patients after anesthesia induction. More patients in group O had hemodynamic instability (47.9% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.009) than in group N. The mean postoperative length of stay in the hospital was 10.64 ± 3.01 days, and most of the patients made an uneventful postoperative recovery.

Conclusions

Anesthetic management for myxoma resection can be composed by assessing the myxoma, particularly the echocardiography evaluation and preventing cardiovascular instability. Typically, tricuspid or mitral valve with obstruction is a premier ingredient in anesthetic management.

Patients with infective endocarditis undergoing cardiac surgery have distinct ROTEM profiles and more bleeding complications compared to patients without infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

The coagulation system is crucial in the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis and undergoes significant changes during course of the disease. However, little is known about the implications of those changes in the perioperative period. Aim of the present study was to delineate the specific coagulation patterns and their clinical consequence in patients undergoing cardiac surgery due to infective endocarditis.

METHODS

In this single-centre, exploratory, prospective observational study, we investigated the incidence and degree of coagulopathy in patients with (n = 31) and without infective endocarditis (n = 39) undergoing cardiac valve surgery. The primary outcome was the differences between these two groups in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) results before, during and after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the differences between the groups in heparin sensitivity, bleeding complications, and transfusion requirements.

RESULTS

Most ROTEM parameters in EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM assays were significantly altered in patients with infective endocarditis. Clotting time in the EXTEM assay was significantly prolonged in the endocarditis group at all time-points, while all clot firmness parameters (A5, A10 and MCF) were significantly increased. The heparin sensitivity index was significantly lower in the endocarditis group (median index 0.99 vs 1.17s. IU-1.kg-1, p = .008), indicating increased heparin resistance. Patients with infective endocarditis had more bleeding complications as assessed by the universal definition of perioperative bleeding score (OR 3.0, p = .018), and more patients with endocarditis underwent early re-exploration (p = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this exploratory investigation show significantly altered coagulation profiles in patients with infective endocarditis, with concomitant hyper- and hypocoagulability. Furthermore, the incidence of bleeding complications and transfusion requirements were increased in patients with endocarditis. These results show the potential of ROTEM to detect coagulation abnormalities in patients with infective endocarditis. Existing point-of-care coagulation testing guided algorithms for optimizing perioperative coagulation management possibly need to be adjusted for these high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Application of anti-Xa assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy in contemporary antithrombotic management

INTRODUCTION

Unfractionated heparin remains the most widely used agent in the prevention and acute treatment of thrombosis. Pharmacological complexities of this intriguing agent mandate frequent monitoring of its anticoagulant properties to maintain safe and effective hematological outcomes. Although activated partial thromboplastin time has been the standard test to monitor unfractionated heparin therapy for many decades, the anti-Xa assay has emerged as a substitute or adjunct in many institutions.

AREAS COVERED

This brief report outlines the key features of anti-Xa assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin in acute management of thrombosis in various contemporary settings, with emphasis on evidence for clinical outcomes. PubMed.gov database was utilized to obtain the pertinent literature.

EXPERT OPINION

The anti-Xa activity is primarily a reflection of UFH concentration and does not account for other hematological variables frequently present in contemporary anticoagulation management. The advantage of the anti-Xa assay in monitoring UFH therapy is predicated upon its limitations to account for global physiological hemostasis. There are significant disease and drug interactions that may potentially result in false in-vitro analysis of anti-Xa activity. Routine application of the anti-Xa assay is not evidence-based at this time.

Anticoagulation Management during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Mini-Review

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been established as a life-saving technique for patients with the most severe forms of respiratory or cardiac failure. It can, however, be associated with severe complications. Anticoagulation therapy is required to prevent ECMO circuit thrombosis. It is, however, associated with an increased risk of hemocoagulation disorders. Thus, safe anticoagulation is a cornerstone of ECMO therapy. The most frequently used anticoagulant is unfractionated heparin, which can, however, cause significant adverse effects. Novel drugs (e.g., argatroban and bivalirudin) may be superior to heparin in the better predictability of their effects, functioning independently of antithrombin, inhibiting thrombin bound to fibrin, and eliminating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. It is also necessary to keep in mind that hemocoagulation tests are not specific, and their results, used for setting up the dosage, can be biased by many factors. The knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of particular drugs, limitations of particular tests, and individualization are cornerstones of prevention against critical events, such as life-threatening bleeding or acute oxygenator failure followed by life-threatening hypoxemia and hemodynamic deterioration. This paper describes the effects of anticoagulant drugs used in ECMO and their monitoring, highlighting specific conditions and factors that might influence coagulation and anticoagulation measurements.

Heparin Resistance in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Introduction: Heparin resistance has been reported in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UFH). Anti-Xa monitoring of IV UFH has been suggested over activated partial thromboplastin times due to laboratory interference from elevated factor VIII and fibrinogen levels in COVID-19 patients. Information on heparin resistance with anti-Xa monitoring in COVID-19 patients with confirmed venous thromboembolism (VTE) is lacking. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of patients with radiographically confirmed VTE, IV UFH dosage requirements in COVID-19 positive patients were compared with COVID-19 negative patients. The primary endpoint was the IV UFH dose needed to achieve a therapeutic anti-Xa level. Secondary endpoints included time to therapeutic anti-Xa, number of dose adjustments to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa, and bleeding. Results: Sixty-four patients with confirmed VTE were included (20 patients COVID-19 positive, 44 patients COVID-19 negative). Eighty-five percent (17 of 20) of COVID-19 positive patients achieved anti-Xa ≥ 0.3 units/mL with the first anti-Xa level drawn post-IV UFH infusion initiation. The median UFH dose needed to achieve first therapeutic anti-Xa was similar between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients (median [IQR]: 18 units/kg/hour [18-18] vs 18 units/kg/hour [18-18], P = .423). The median number of dose adjustments and time to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa were also similar between the 2 groups. The frequency of patients receiving IV UFH of more 35 000 units/day did not differ between the 2 groups. Two cases of clinically significant heparin resistance in the COVID-19 positive group were identified. Conclusions: During the first wave of COVID-19, heparin dose and time to therapeutic anticoagulation appeared to be similar between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients monitored by anti-Xa at our institution. More studies are required to evaluate clinically significant heparin resistance in the context of the wide range of viral variants which developed, and beyond the population observed in this single center retrospective study.

Gene editing of human iPSCs rescues thrombophilia in hereditary antithrombin deficiency in mice

Hereditary antithrombin deficiency is caused by SERPINC1 gene mutations and predisposes to recurrent venous thromboembolism that can be life-threatening. Therefore, lifelong anticoagulation is required, which has side effects and may not be effective. In this study, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a patient with severe antithrombin deficiency were reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). The mutation was corrected using CRISPR-Cas9 and Cre/LoxP genome editing. iPSCs were differentiated into hepatocytes, which were injected into the spleen of antithrombin knockout mice to restore the activity of antithrombin and reduce the thrombophilic state. Human iPSC-differentiated hepatocytes colonized mice and secreted antithrombin stably, normalizing antithrombin in plasma (activity: from 46.8 ± 5.7% to 88.6 ± 7.6%, P < 0.0001; antigen: from 146.9 ± 19.5 nanograms per milliliter to 390.7 ± 16.1 nanograms per milliliter, P < 0.0001). In venous thrombosis model, the rate of thrombosis in mice treated with edited hepatocytes, parental hepatocytes, and wild-type mice were 60, 90, and 70%, respectively. The thrombus weight was much lighter in mice treated with edited hepatocytes compared with parental hepatocytes (7.25 ± 2.00 milligrams versus 15.32 ± 2.87 milligrams, P = 0.0025) and showed no notable difference compared with that in wild-type mice (10.41 ± 2.91 milligrams). The activity and concentration of antithrombin remained high for 3 weeks after injection. The liver and kidney function markers showed no obvious abnormality during the observation period. This study provides a proof of principle for correction of mutations in patient-derived iPSCs and potential therapeutic applications for hereditary thrombophilia.

A Case of Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Due to Acquired Antithrombin Deficiency-related Heparin Resistance Successfully Treated with Antithrombin Gamma Supplementation

A 75-year-old man receiving treatment for necrotizing pancreatitis developed septic disseminated intravascular coagulation and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a large amount of fresh thrombi appeared after balloon dilatation for the ACS-culprit lesion. Given the low plasma AT activity and poorly prolonged activated clotting time (ACT), we suspected that acquired AT deficiency-related heparin resistance (HR) was responsible for the thrombus formation. Administration of AT gamma markedly improved ACT, and we successfully completed PCI. We suggest that AT gamma be considered a treatment option for AT deficiency-related HR and subsequent intraprocedural thrombotic events.

Heparin Resistance During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery

The use of heparin for anticoagulation has changed the face of cardiac surgery by allowing a bloodless and motionless surgical field throughout the introduction of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, heparin is a drug with complex pharmacologic properties that can cause significant interpatient differences in terms of responsiveness. Heparin resistance during CPB is a weighty issue due to the catastrophic consequences stemming from inadequate anticoagulation, and the treatment of it necessitates a rationalized stepwise approach due to the multifactorial contributions toward this entity. The widespread use of activated clotting time (ACT) as a measurement of anticoagulation during CPB is examined, as it may be a false indicator of heparin resistance. Heparin resistance also has been repeatedly reported in patients infected with COVID-19, which deserves further exploration in this pandemic era. This review aims to examine the variability in heparin potency, underlying mechanisms, and limitations of using ACT for monitoring, as well as provide a framework towards the current management of heparin resistance.

Evaluation of Bivalirudin Dosing in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Renal Insufficiency or Renal Replacement Therapy

Bivalirudin offers several important advantages of relevance to the management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. This multicenter retrospective analysis evaluated the bivalirudin dosing in pediatric ECMO and correlated these doses with the severity of renal dysfunction. A total of 75 patients were included in this analyses: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (n = 29), eGFR 30-60 (n = 18), eGFR < 30 (n = 28), and of those 23 were on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The initial bivalirudin dose used to reach therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with eGFR > 60 was significantly higher than the dose required in those with renal impairment (0.25 mg/kg/hr in patients with eGFR > 60 and 0.19 mg/kg/hr in patients on RRT, 0.18 mg/kg/hr in patients with eGFR 30-60 and 0.13 mg/kg/hr in patients with eGFR < 30 with no RRT). Progressive dose escalations (two to threefold increase) were required to maintain therapeutic range over the initial 4 days of ECMO that coincided with improving renal creatinine clearance during that same time period. Establishing an initial starting dose of bivalirudin contingent upon eGFR is essential for the rapid achievement of target anticoagulation intensity. Further dose adjustments guided by laboratory monitoring is necessary given the dynamic changes in creatinine clearance following ECMO initiation.

Insulin or blood purification treatment for hypertriglyceridaemia-associated acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Hypertriglyceridaemia increases risks from acute pancreatitis (HTG-AP) over other aetiologies, but optimal management for HTG-AP remains undefined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of insulin-based treatment (IT) versus blood purification treatment (BPT) for HTG-AP.

METHODS

Searches were conducted to identify randomised trials and observational studies published between 1946 and 2022 that compared IT and BPT for HTG-AP reporting baseline and post-treatment serum triglyceride (TG) levels with clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was serum TG reduction (Δ-TG) from baseline while secondary outcomes included complications, length of stay, adverse events, and cost.

RESULTS

Fifteen (1 randomised, 2 prospective case-controlled, and 12 retrospective cohort) studies were analysed comprising 909 cases with HTG-AP. Pooled results demonstrated IT was significantly less efficient than BPT in Δ-TG at 24 h (WMD -666.06, 95% CI -1130.18 to -201.94, P = 0.005; 12 studies), at 48 h (WMD -672.60, 95% CI -1233.44 to -111.77; 8 studies), and overall Δ-TG by day 7 (WMD -385.81, 95% CI -711.07 to -60.54; 8 studies) (both P = 0.02). IT, however, was associated with significantly fewer adverse events (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.27, P < 0.0001; 7 studies) and significantly reduced cost (WMD -2.50, 95% CI -3.61 to -1.39, P < 0.00001; 3 studies). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two regimens (all P ≥ 0.11). In subgroup analysis Δ-TG at 24 h and overall Δ-TG became insignificant, while other results were unaffected.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the general use of IT for inpatient management of HTG-AP, restricting BPT to those predicted or found to respond poorly to IT.

Editor's Choice - Sex Differences in Response to Administration of Heparin During Non-Cardiac Arterial Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Females are more prone to complications during non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAPs) than males. The current study investigated the difference in the effect of peri-procedural prophylactic heparin in males and females, using the activated clotting time (ACT). This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicentre cohort study.

METHODS

All patients undergoing elective NCAP using heparin and ACT measurements between January 2016 and March 2020 were included. Two heparin dosage protocols were used: weight based dosing of 100 IU/kg (international units per kilogram) or a bolus of 5 000 IU. The primary outcome was the anticoagulatory effect of heparin after five minutes, measured by ACT. Secondary outcomes were the effect of heparin after 30 minutes, bleeding complications, and arterial thromboembolic complications (ATECs).

RESULTS

A total of 778 patients were included; 26% were female. After 100 IU/kg (n = 300), females more often reached longer ACT (< 200 seconds: 22% vs. 25%, p = .62; 200 - 250 seconds: 41% vs. 53%, p = .058; 251 - 280 seconds, 26% vs. 15%, p = .030). The mean ACT after 100 IU/kg heparin was 233 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI] 224 - 243) for females and 226 seconds (95% CI 221 - 231) for males (p = .057). After a bolus of 5 000 IU of heparin (n = 411), females reached significantly higher levels of anticoagulation than males (mean ACT 204 seconds vs. 190 seconds: p ≤ .001; ACT < 200 seconds: 44% vs. 66%; p < .001; ACT 200 - 250 seconds: 47% vs. 30%, p = .001; ACT 251 - 280 seconds: 7.8% vs. 2.3%, p = .009). Thirty minutes after heparin administration, 58% of all patients had an ACT < 200 seconds. ATECs did not differ between females and males (6.9% vs. 5.1%, p = .33) but bleeding complications were higher in females (27% vs. 16%, p = .001).

CONCLUSION

Heparin leads to significantly longer ACT in females during NCAP. Further research is needed to investigate whether individually based heparin protocols lead to fewer bleeding complications and lower incidence of ATECs.

Anticoagulation Monitoring with Activated Partial ThromboPlastin Time and Anti-Xa Activity in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Interest of Thrombin Generation Assay

Current guidelines recommend monitoring the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) by measuring anti-Xa activity rather than activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation of aPTT, anti-Xa activity, and thrombin generation in UFH-treated ICU patients. A prospective observational pilot study was conducted in adult surgical ICU patients treated with UFH. aPTT and anti-Xa activity were monitored daily. The therapeutic target was aPTT between 50 s and 84 s, and/or anti-Xa between 0.3 and 0.7 U/mL. Correlation among aPTT, anti-Xa activity, and thrombin generation was determined by measuring endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), with the inflammatory response evaluated. C-reactive protein (CRP) was used as a marker of inflammatory response. The plasma of 107 samples from 30 ICU patients was analyzed. The correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa activity was 0.66, CI95% [0.54;0.76] (p < 0.0001). Although thrombin generation, aPTT, and anti-Xa were correlated with inflammatory responses, the correlation was higher with thrombin generation and anti-Xa activity compared to aPTT. When aPTT was in a therapeutic range, a low thrombin generation was observed but was 50% inhibited when anti-Xa was in a therapeutic range. Coagulation testing with aPTT, anti-Xa correlated with thrombin generation. A 50% decrease in thrombin generation was observed when anti-Xa was within a therapeutic range. Further work is needed to evaluate coagulation biomarker responses and clinical outcomes in specific ICU populations.

Anticoagulation Strategies during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review

The development of extracorporeal life support technology has added a new dimension to the care of critically ill patients who fail conventional treatment options. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)—specialized temporary life support for patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure—plays a role in bridging the time for organ recovery, transplant, or permanent assistance. The overall patient outcome is dependent on the underlying disease, comorbidities, patient reaction to critical illness, and potential adverse events during ECMO. Moreover, the contact of the blood with the large artificial surface of an extracorporeal system circuit triggers complex inflammatory and coagulation responses. These processes may further lead to endothelial injury and disrupted microcirculation with consequent end-organ dysfunction and the development of adverse events like thromboembolism. Therefore, systemic anticoagulation is considered crucial to alleviate the risk of thrombosis and failure of ECMO circuit components. The gold standard and most used anticoagulant during extracorporeal life support is unfractionated heparin, with all its benefits and disadvantages. However, therapeutic anticoagulation of a critically ill patient carries the risk of clinically relevant bleeding with the potential for permanent injury or death. Similarly, thrombotic events may occur. Therefore, different anticoagulation strategies are employed, while the monitoring and the balance of procoagulant and anticoagulatory factors is of immense importance. This narrative review summarizes the most recent considerations on anticoagulation during ECMO support, with a special focus on anticoagulation monitoring and future directions.

The relationship between antithrombin administration and inflammation during veno-venous ECMO

Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is used in the most severe cases of respiratory failure and further exacerbates the patients’ inflammatory status. Antithrombin is supplemented during ECMO for its anticoagulant effects, but it also deploys anti-inflammatory properties. In this pre-specified ancillary study of the GATRA trial [NCT03208270] we aimed to evaluate the relationship between antithrombin and inflammation during ECMO. Forty-six patients were included in the study, 23 were randomized to receive antithrombin to maintain a level of 80–120% (study group) and 23 were randomized not to be supplemented (control group). Anticoagulation was provided in both groups with heparin infusion. Six cytokines were measured at 5 timepoints from prior to ECMO start to 7 days after ECMO removal. Cytokines decreased during the study but overall were not very different in the two groups. Testing the interaction between the study group and timepoints suggests that the administration of antithrombin led to a more rapid decrease over time of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-⍺ and Pro-ADM. Plasma levels of antithrombin (either endogenous or exogenous) were negatively associated with all cytokines. Inflammation decreases during ECMO but a causal effect of antithrombin administration on the reduction of inflammation (and its clinical relevance) must be confirmed by appropriately powered studies.

Andexanet-Alfa-Associated Heparin Resistance in the Context of Hemorrhagic Stroke

Background

With a growing number of patients on new oral anticoagulants, interest in reversal agents is rising. Andexanet alfa is used for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in intracranial hemorrhage.

Methods

We provide a brief review on andexanet-alfa-associated heparin resistance and discuss potentially critical situations from different clinical perspectives.

Results

Case reports point out that andexanet alfa can cause unresponsiveness to heparin, leading to catastrophic events. As a result, regulatory bodies have issued warning notices to avoid heparinization parallel to the use of andexanet alfa.

Conclusions

Although well known to hematologists, the phenomenon is underrecognized among stroke clinicians. However, patients with intracranial hemorrhage frequently undergo endovascular or surgical interventions that require periprocedural administration of heparin.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID-19 patients: A systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE

Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. While veno-venous extracorporeal life support (V-V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow-up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation-to-cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS-only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID-19 patients (females: 28.8%; median age: 54.3 years, 95%CI: 50.7-57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V-V ECLS, 4.7% on veno-arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V-V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI: 13.9-16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V-V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy-right ventricular assist device.

CONCLUSION

MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID-19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID-19.

The Role of Excessive Anticoagulation and Missing Hyperinflammation in ECMO-Associated Bleeding

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in carefully selected patients with cardiac or respiratory failure. However, complications are common and can be associated with worse outcomes, while data on risk factors and outcomes are inconsistent and sparse. Therefore, we sought to investigate potential risk factors and predictors of haemorrhage and adverse events during ECMO and its influence on mortality. We retrospectively reviewed all patients on ECMO support admitted to intensive care units of a tertiary university centre in Austria. In a period of ten years, ECMO support was used in 613 patients, with 321 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. Haemorrhage, occurring in more than one third of the included patients (123, 38%), represented the most common and serious ECMO complication, being associated with an increased one year mortality (51% vs. 35%, p = 0.005). The main risk factors for haemorrhage were severity of the disease (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, p = 0.047), a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (HR = 1.01, p = 0.007), and lower values of C-reactive protein (HR = 0.96, p = 0.005) and procalcitonin (HR = 0.99, p = 0.029). In summary, haemorrhage remained the main ECMO complication with increased mortality. Moreover, we reported a possible association of lower inflammation and bleeding during ECMO support for the first time. This generated a new hypothesis that warrants further research. Finally, we recommend stricter monitoring of anticoagulation especially in patients without hyperinflammation.

Monitoring of heparin therapy beyond the anti-Xa activity assay: Evaluation of a thrombin generation assay

INTRODUCTION

Global coagulation assays may be of added value to the anti-Xa assay for monitoring heparin therapy. Unlike most testing methods, the thrombin generation assay (TGA) has the ability to assess the overall function of the hemostatic system, which provides information on the anticoagulation status of patients. We compared the TGA, measured with ST Genesia^® STG-DrugScreen^® reagent, with the anti-Xa assay for monitoring heparin therapy in inflammatory and non-inflammatory patients. We also determined reference values for STG-DrugScreen^® thrombin generation (TG) parameters.

METHODS

Reference values were determined on 120 healthy donors. Furthermore, a spiking experiment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was performed, and samples of patients receiving UFH or LMWH were analyzed with ST Genesia^® and the anti-Xa assay.

RESULTS

High discrepancy between TG parameters and anti-Xa activity was observed for low LMWH anti-Xa levels. TG parameters were affected in 36/46 (time to peak) to 42/46 (peak height) patients during UFH therapy with sub-target anti-Xa activity levels.

CONCLUSION

TGA seems insufficiently sensitive for low concentrations of LMWH. There may be an added value of the TGA for monitoring UFH in so-called heparin-resistant patients. Therefore, the TGA has the potential to be introduced as an additional tool for monitoring heparin therapy.

Case Report: Idiopathic Subcutaneous Thrombotic Vasculopathy

Lower extremity ulcers have significant morbidity, with treatment determined by the underlying disorder. Reported is a 32-year-old female presenting with small skin nodules and bruises across her legs 4 weeks following her second COVID vaccination. These lesions progressed into large, necrotic ulcers over several months. Initial work-up showed widespread pannicular thrombotic vasculopathy with ischemic skin necrosis. The tissue was negative for calcification on Von Kossa histochemistry, and a working diagnosis of subcutaneous thrombotic vasculopathy was suggested. The ulcers progressed despite treatments with corticosteroids, therapeutic anticoagulation, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, sodium thiosulfate, wound care, and repeat debridement. Later debridement specimens demonstrated rare vascular and pannicular calcifications. This finding supports the hypothesis that subcutaneous thrombotic vasculopathy is a precursor to calciphylaxis, the patient’s current working diagnosis. However, based on the patient’s entire clinical picture, a definitive diagnosis has yet to be found. This report highlights the challenges of working with rare diseases and the importance of multidisciplinary cooperation.

The addition of Tirofiban infusion to heparin for intraoperative heparin resistance associated with Marfan Syndrome

Marfan syndrome classically presents with aortic root aneurysms. Aortic ectasia causes diverse blood flow alterations, influencing the behavior of coagulation factors and platelet activity. Heparin resistance has also been reported associated with Marfan Syndrome in a small number of patients, probably due to antithrombin III (ATIII) deficiency or various mutations. The ascending aorta and the aortic valve are replaced with prosthetic material during Bentall- de Bonno procedures. Resistance to anticoagulation during extracorporeal circulation, represents a significant challenge for both anesthesiologists and the surgical team. Resistance to heparin was observed in a patient with Marfan syndrome undergoing a Bentall procedure. ATIII concentrate was not available, and ACT did not increase despite high doses of heparin. An alternate anticoagulation approach was used successfully.

How we manage blood product support and coagulation in the adult patient requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasing among critically ill adults with cardiac and/or respiratory failure. Use of ECMO is associated with hemostatic alterations requiring use of anticoagulation and blood product support. There are limited guidelines to direct transfusion management in the adult patient supported with ECMO. The objective of this article is to describe (1) the role of the transfusion service in providing transfusion support and current understanding of transfusion thresholds, (2) the complexities of monitoring anticoagulation, and (3) the consideration regarding additional factor concentrates and antifibrinolytics within the context of ECMO support. The information provided should assist ECMO care teams in informing transfusion and anticoagulation practice while highlighting key areas for future research and collaboration.

COVID-19 Coagulopathy: From Pathogenesis to Treatment

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a pandemic at the end of 2019 and continues to exert an unfavorable worldwide health impact on a large proportion of the population. A remarkable feature of COVID-19 is the precipitation of a hypercoagulable state, mainly in severe cases, leading to micro- and macrothrombosis, respiratory failure, and death. Despite the implementation of various therapeutic regimes, including anticoagulants, a large number of patients suffer from such serious complications. This review aims to describe the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of the coagulation mechanism in COVID-19. We describe the interplay between three important mediators of the disease and how this may lead to a hyperinflammatory and prothrombotic state that affects outcome, namely, the endothelium, the immune system, and the coagulation system. In line with the hypercoagulability state during COVID-19, we further review on the rare but severe vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. We also summarize and comment on available anticoagulant treatment options and include suggestions for some future treatment considerations for COVID-19 anticoagulation therapy.