51
|
Shultz S, Vouloumanos A, Bennett RH, Pelphrey K. Neural specialization for speech in the first months of life. Dev Sci 2014; 17:766-74. [PMID: 24576182 PMCID: PMC4232861 DOI: 10.1111/desc.12151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Accepted: 10/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
How does the brain’s response to speech change over the first months of life? Although behavioral findings indicate that neonates’ listening biases are sharpened over the first months of life, with a species-specific preference for speech emerging by 3 months, the neural substrates underlying this developmental change are unknown. We examined neural responses to speech compared with biological non-speech sounds in 1- to 4-month-old infants using fMRI. Infants heard speech and biological non-speech sounds, including heterospecific vocalizations and human non-speech. We observed a left-lateralized response in temporal cortex for speech compared to biological non-speech sounds, indicating that this region is highly selective for speech by the first month of life. Specifically, this brain region becomes increasingly selective for speech over the next 3 months as neural substrates become less responsive to non-speech sounds. These results reveal specific changes in neural responses during a developmental period characterized by rapid behavioral changes.
Collapse
|
52
|
Talkington WJ, Taglialatela JP, Lewis JW. Using naturalistic utterances to investigate vocal communication processing and development in human and non-human primates. Hear Res 2013; 305:74-85. [PMID: 23994296 PMCID: PMC3839530 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2012] [Revised: 08/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Humans and several non-human primates possess cortical regions that are most sensitive to vocalizations produced by their own kind (conspecifics). However, the use of speech and other broadly defined categories of behaviorally relevant natural sounds has led to many discrepancies regarding where voice-sensitivity occurs, and more generally the identification of cortical networks, "proto-networks" or protolanguage networks, and pathways that may be sensitive or selective for certain aspects of vocalization processing. In this prospective review we examine different approaches for exploring vocal communication processing, including pathways that may be, or become, specialized for conspecific utterances. In particular, we address the use of naturally produced non-stereotypical vocalizations (mimicry of other animal calls) as another category of vocalization for use with human and non-human primate auditory systems. We focus this review on two main themes, including progress and future ideas for studying vocalization processing in great apes (chimpanzees) and in very early stages of human development, including infants and fetuses. Advancing our understanding of the fundamental principles that govern the evolution and early development of cortical pathways for processing non-verbal communication utterances is expected to lead to better diagnoses and early intervention strategies in children with communication disorders, improve rehabilitation of communication disorders resulting from brain injury, and develop new strategies for intelligent hearing aid and implant design that can better enhance speech signals in noisy environments. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Communication Sounds and the Brain: New Directions and Perspectives".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J. Talkington
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, and Center for Advanced Imaging, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV26506, USA
| | - Jared P. Taglialatela
- Department of Biology and Physics, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA
| | - James W. Lewis
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Sensory Neuroscience Research Center, and Center for Advanced Imaging, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV26506, USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Lloyd-Fox S, Wu R, Richards JE, Elwell CE, Johnson MH. Cortical activation to action perception is associated with action production abilities in young infants. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 25:289-97. [PMID: 23975948 PMCID: PMC4303799 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The extent to which perception and action share common neural processes is much debated in cognitive neuroscience. Taking a developmental approach to this issue allows us to assess whether perceptual processing develops in close association with the emergence of related action skills within the same individual. The current study used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to investigate the perception of human action in 4- to 6-month-old human infants. In addition, the infants' manual dexterity was assessed using the fine motor component of The Mullen Scales of Early Learning and an in-house developed Manual Dexterity task. Results show that the degree of cortical activation, within the posterior superior temporal sulcus—temporoparietal junction (pSTS-TPJ) region, to the perception of manual actions in individual infants correlates with their own level of fine motor skills. This association was not fully explained by either measures of global attention (i.e., looking time) or general developmental stage. This striking concordance between the emergence of motor skills and related perceptual processing within individuals is consistent with experience-related cortical specialization in the developing brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Lloyd-Fox
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, Greater London WC1E 7HU, UK
| | - Rachel Wu
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
| | - John E Richards
- Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Clare E Elwell
- Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Mark H Johnson
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, London, Greater London WC1E 7HU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
An online database of infant functional near infrared spectroscopy studies: a community-augmented systematic review. PLoS One 2013; 8:e58906. [PMID: 23554955 PMCID: PMC3598807 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2012] [Accepted: 02/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Until recently, imaging the infant brain was very challenging. Functional Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a promising, relatively novel technique, whose use is rapidly expanding. As an emergent field, it is particularly important to share methodological knowledge to ensure replicable and robust results. In this paper, we present a community-augmented database which will facilitate precisely this exchange. We tabulated articles and theses reporting empirical fNIRS research carried out on infants below three years of age along several methodological variables. The resulting spreadsheet has been uploaded in a format allowing individuals to continue adding new results, and download the most recent version of the table. Thus, this database is ideal to carry out systematic reviews. We illustrate its academic utility by focusing on the factors affecting three key variables: infant attrition, the reliability of oxygenated and deoxygenated responses, and signal-to-noise ratios. We then discuss strengths and weaknesses of the DBIfNIRS, and conclude by suggesting a set of simple guidelines aimed to facilitate methodological convergence through the standardization of reports.
Collapse
|
55
|
Lloyd-Fox S, Blasi A, Elwell CE, Charman T, Murphy D, Johnson MH. Reduced neural sensitivity to social stimuli in infants at risk for autism. Proc Biol Sci 2013; 280:20123026. [PMID: 23486434 PMCID: PMC3619456 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.3026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In the hope of discovering early markers of autism, attention has recently turned to the study of infants at risk owing to being the younger siblings of children with autism. Because the condition is highly heritable, later-born siblings of diagnosed children are at substantially higher risk for developing autism or the broader autism phenotype than the general population. Currently, there are no strong predictors of autism in early infancy and diagnosis is not reliable until around 3 years of age. Because indicators of brain functioning may be sensitive predictors, and atypical social interactions are characteristic of the syndrome, we examined whether temporal lobe specialization for processing visual and auditory social stimuli during infancy differs in infants at risk. In a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study, infants aged 4–6 months at risk for autism showed less selective neural responses to social stimuli (auditory and visual) than low-risk controls. These group differences could not be attributed to overall levels of attention, developmental stage or chronological age. Our results provide the first demonstration of specific differences in localizable brain function within the first 6 months of life in a group of infants at risk for autism. Further, these differences closely resemble known patterns of neural atypicality in children and adults with autism. Future work will determine whether these differences in infant neural responses to social stimuli predict either later autism or the broader autism phenotype frequently seen in unaffected family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lloyd-Fox
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Papademetriou MD, Richards J, Correia T, Blasi A, Murphy DG, Lloyd-Fox S, Johnson MH, Elwell CE. Cortical mapping of 3D optical topography in infants. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2013; 789:455-461. [PMID: 23852529 PMCID: PMC3959177 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7411-1_61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
Precise localisation of cortical activation in the early development of the infant brain remains unclear. It is challenging to co-register haemodynamic responses during functional activation in infants with the underlying anatomy of the brain. We used a multispectral imaging algorithm to reconstruct 3D optical topographic images of haemodynamic responses in an infant during voice processing. In this chapter, we present a method for co-registering 3D optical topography images reconstructed from functional activation data in infants onto anatomical brain images obtained from MRI structurals of the individual infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria D Papademetriou
- Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
| | - John Richards
- Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Teresa Correia
- Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Blasi
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, UK
- Department of Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, London, UK
| | - Sarah Lloyd-Fox
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, UK
| | - Mark H Johnson
- Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London, UK
| | - Clare E Elwell
- Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Abstract
In the previous issue of Social Neuroscience, Lloyd-Fox and colleagues ( 2012 ) provide evidence that voice-sensitivity in temporal cortex emerges between 4 and 7 months of age. We discuss the implications of these findings and the overall progress that has been made in understanding the development of voice processing in infancy. In this commentary, we also examine important methodological and theoretical issues raised by this new work in the emerging field of developmental social neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Grossmann
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|