51
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly gaining widespread acceptance among urologists, including extensive application in malignant conditions. However, untoward occurrences of port site metastases have not eluded to urological applications. This up-to-date review on port site metastases in urology delineates possible contributing factors and describes techniques to prevent it. MATERIALS AND METHODS We comprehensively reviewed published experimental and clinical studies with special emphasis on the incidence, pathophysiology and prevention of port site metastases. RESULTS Nine cases of port site metastases after urological laparoscopy have been described in clinical and experimental studies. Etiological factors include natural malignant disease behavior, host immune status, local wound factors, laparoscopy related factors such as aerosolization of tumor cells (the use of gas, type of gas, insufflation and desufflation, and pneumoperitoneum) and sufficient technical experience of the surgeons and operating team (adequate laparoscopic equipment, skill, minimal handling of the tumor, surgical manipulation and wound contamination during instruments change, organ morcellation and specimen removal). CONCLUSIONS Port site metastases is a multifactorial phenomenon with an as yet undetermined incidence. The problem is influenced to some extent by surgeon and operating team experience and, therefore, it could be partially prevented. The suggested preventive steps are avoiding laparoscopic surgery when there are ascites, trocar fixation to prevent dislodgment, avoiding gas leakage along and around the trocar, sufficient technical readiness of the operating team (adequate laparoscopic equipment and technique, minimal handling and avoiding tumor boundary violation of the tumor), using a bag for specimen removal, placing drainage when needed before desufflation, povidone-iodine irrigation of instruments, trocars and port site wounds, and suturing 10 mm. and larger trocar wounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tsivian
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Holon, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Parekh DJ, Wells N, Shuford MD, Cookson MS, Smith JA, Herrell SD, Chang SS, McDougall EM. Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open radical nephrectomy in patients at high anesthetic risk. J Endourol 2003; 17:161-7. [PMID: 12803988 DOI: 10.1089/089277903321618725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The laparoscopic approach for management of high-risk patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) may reduce perioperative and postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of purely laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN), and open radical nephrectomy (ORN) for renal tumors in a population of patients at high risk for perioperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for presumed RCC between August 1999 and August 2001 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and having an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of >/=3 were reviewed. Patients with known metastasis, local invasion, caval thrombi, or additional simultaneous surgical procedures were excluded from analysis. Thirteen patients underwent LRN, eight patients underwent HALRN, and 26 underwent ORN. The patient demographics were similar in the three groups. The groups were compared with regard to intraoperative and postoperative parameters. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square testing for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. Differences in outcomes were examined using ANOVA and Dunnett's T for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS The ASA 4 patients had significantly longer hospital stays and total hospital costs than the ASA 3 patients. The mean operative time in the ASA 3 patients was similar in the three groups: 2.8 hours, 2.8 hours, and 2.5 hours for the LRN, HALRN, and ORN patients, respectively. Both the LRN patients (22.9 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent) and the HALRN patients (42.1 mg) required less pain medication than the open surgery patients (97.7 mg). When the total hospital costs were compared, LRN was less costly than HALRN ($6089 v $7678; P = 0.57) and open surgery ($6089 v $7694; P = 0.04). The complication rate in the LRN, HALRN, and ORN group was 0%, 25%, and 27%, respectively, although the differences were not statistically different (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS Both LRN and HALRN can be performed safely in patients with significant comorbid conditions. Careful preoperative preparation, intraoperative monitoring, and awareness of laparoscopy-induced oliguria can preclude inadvertent overhydration, hemodilution, and congestive heart failure. Both LRN and HALRN result in less pain medication requirement and faster return to oral intake than ORN, and LRN results in fewer perioperative complications than HALRN or ORN in patients at high perioperative risk. The LRN technique has a 21% lower total cost than both HALRN and ORN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Duane Baldwin
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Wille AH, Roigas J, Deger S, Türk I, Tüllmann M, Dubbke A, Schnorr D. [Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: indications, techniques, and oncological outcome]. Urologe A 2003; 42:205-10. [PMID: 12607088 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-002-0276-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is likely to become one of the most important indications for laparoscopic surgery worldwide. The laparoscopic technique combines the benefits of the minimally invasive approach with established surgical principles. In our institution the laparoscopic transperitoneal approach with intact specimen extraction has become the standard technique for radical nephrectomies. We report the indications, techniques, and oncological outcome in a single center experience in 100 cases. The mean tumor size was 5.9 cm (range: 2-11 cm), the blood loss was 220 ml, and the mean surgical time was 211 min, including the learning curves of five surgeons. Histological findings were pT1 in 66 (66%), pT2 in 11 (11%), and pT3 in 19 (19%) patients with an increasing tumor size according to the experience of the surgeons. In four cases (4%) histology did not prove malignant disease. Positive lymph nodes were detected in three cases (3%) and surgical margins were negative for tumor in all patients. To date 61 patients were available for follow-up; patients with primary metastatic disease were excluded from this analysis. Follow-up was between 1 and 30 months with an average of 12.9 months. Progressive disease occurred in two cases in patients with pT3G3 tumors. No cases of local recurrence or port metastasis occurred during observation. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a routine, effective treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Our follow-up data up to 30 months confirm the effectiveness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in terms of surgical principles and oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H Wille
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Controversy surrounds the process of morcellation for retrieving laparoscopically removed specimens. The inability to assess tumor stage, increased difficulty in pathological examination and the potential for tumor spillage are cited as significant disadvantages of the technique. We examined cytological findings in bag washings after laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign and malignant diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS We prospectively obtained cytology washings from the retrieval bag after laparoscopic nephrectomy and manual morcellation. In 22 consecutive cases after specimen fragmentation in a LapSac (Cook Urological, Spencer, Indiana) the bag was thoroughly irrigated with 30 cc normal saline. This wash was then processed by ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp., Marlborough, Massachusetts) and stained with Papanicolaou stain. Standard pathological examination of the morcellated specimen was performed to determine renal histology. RESULTS The histological diagnosis was clear cell renal carcinoma in 10 cases, multicystic renal carcinoma in 2, papillary renal cell carcinoma in 1, angiomyolipoma in 1, and oncocytoma in 1. Bag cytological results were accurate in 9 of 13 patients with carcinoma (69%), while in 3 cytological study provided additional information. In all 9 cases of benign histology, cytological findings were consistent with benign cellular features. Neoplastic cells were easily detected and classified into type and grade. CONCLUSIONS Cytological examination of LapSac washings after specimen morcellation provided a pathological diagnosis in the majority of patients. This method may complement existing techniques and be useful for increasing the accuracy of pathological analysis of morcellated specimens. In addition, these data suggest that malignant cells are liberated during the morcellation process, which has significant implications for potential tumor dissemination.
Collapse
|
55
|
Janzen NK, Perry KT, Schulam PG. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and minimally invasive surgery for kidney cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2003; 116:99-117. [PMID: 14650828 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0451-1_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
56
|
Cytology of Morcellated Renal Specimens: Significance in Diagnosis and Dissemination. J Urol 2003. [DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200301000-00011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
57
|
Ziprin P, Ridgway PF, Peck DH, Darzi AW. The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195:395-408. [PMID: 12229949 DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01249-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Ziprin
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
|
59
|
PORTIS ANDREWJ, YAN YAN, LANDMAN JAIME, CHEN CATHY, BARRETT PETERH, FENTIE DONALDD, ONO YOSHINARI, McDOUGALL ELSPETHM, CLAYMAN RALPHV. LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY. J Urol 2002. [DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65277-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- ANDREW J. PORTIS
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - YAN YAN
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - JAIME LANDMAN
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - CATHY CHEN
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - PETER H. BARRETT
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - DONALD D. FENTIE
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - YOSHINARI ONO
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - ELSPETH M. McDOUGALL
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - RALPH V. CLAYMAN
- From the Department of Surgery/Division of Urologic Surgery, and Department of Radiology (Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, Department of Urology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan, and Department of Urology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Pautler SE, Hewitt SM, Linehan WM, Walther MM. Specimen morcellation after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: confirmation of histologic diagnosis using needle biopsy. J Endourol 2002; 16:89-92. [PMID: 11962561 DOI: 10.1089/089277902753619573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) is being increasingly offered for the management of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). Specimen removal may be performed through a small or hand-port incision or by specimen morcellation. Limited studies exist addressing the accuracy of histopathologic diagnosis in morcellated renal tumors. Because of concerns about the lack of a diagnosis secondary to the morcellation process, we performed premorcellation needle biopsies to obtain nondisrupted tissue for pathologic analysis. Herein, we compare the histopathologic diagnosis achieved via needle biopsy prior to morcellation with that of the final specimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Following successful laparoscopic resection, specimens were entrapped in a Lapsac. Needle biopsies were performed manually through the mouth of the Lapsac, and morcellation was then done in some patients using manual and mechanical methods. The histopathologic diagnoses in the needle biopsy specimens and the morcellated material were compared. RESULTS Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with specimen morcellation was performed in 15 patients. Nine patients had premorcellation needle biopsies. Eight of these biopsies had sufficient tissue for diagnosis of RCC. This finding correlated with final diagnosis from the morcellated material. Perinephric fat invasion was identified in three morcellated specimens. CONCLUSIONS Needle biopsy prior to specimen morcellation confirmed the histologic diagnosis of the morcellated specimen. This finding suggests that such histopathology material is adequate for diagnosis and may make premorcellation needle biopsy redundant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E Pautler
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Abstract
The management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to evolve. With the advent of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), minimally invasive approaches to kidney cancer have developed. Laparoscopic resection of locally advanced RCC yields a similar cancer-control rate with the advantage of decreased morbidity. Although cytoreductive LRN is a technically challenging procedure, it may be completed safely in selected patients. Further prospective study of the role of LRN for advanced RCC is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E Pautler
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Building 10, Room 2B47, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Jarrett TW, Marshall FF, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001; 166:2095-9; discussion 2099-100. [PMID: 11696714 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65513-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy in patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 1991 and 1999, 67 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies were performed for clinically localized, stages cT1/2 NXMX, pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma. During this period 54 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy with pathologically confirmed stages pT1/2 NXMX disease were also identified. Medical and operative records were retrospectively reviewed and telephone followup was done to assess patient status. RESULTS In the laparoscopic and open groups average tumor size was 5.1 (range 1 to 13) and 5.4 cm. (range 0.2 to 18), respectively, which was not statistically significant. No patient had laparoscopic port site, wound or renal fossa tumor recurrence in either group. All patients were followed at least 12 months. In the laparoscopic group 2 cancer specific deaths occurred at a mean followup of 35.6 months. In the open group there were 2 cancer specific deaths and 3 cases of disease progression at a mean followup of 44 months. Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival and actuarial survival analysis revealed no significant differences in the laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy groups. Also, no differences were noted in the complication rate. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is an effective alternative for localized renal cell carcinoma when the principles of surgical oncology are maintained. Initial data show shorter patient hospitalization and effective cancer control with no significant difference in survival compared with open radical nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Y Chan
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
|
64
|
Landman J, Clayman RV. RE: PORT SITE TUMOR RECURRENCES OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AFTER VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY. J Urol 2001. [DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66015-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Landman
- Division of Urology, Washington University Medical Center, 4360 Children’s Place, Box 8242, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
| | - Ralph V. Clayman
- Division of Urology, Washington University Medical Center, 4360 Children’s Place, Box 8242, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Affiliation(s)
- P N Schlegel
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Cadeddu JA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Urology 2001; 57:448-53. [PMID: 11248618 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01043-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted nephroureterectomy. METHODS Since 1993, 25 patients with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up underwent nephroureterectomy using a total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted technique. Four patients had specimen morcellation for tissue removal. All patients had regular follow-up with physical examinations, interval cystoscopy, and radiographs, depending on the metastatic potential of the tumor. Retrospective chart review was performed and assessed for operative time, blood loss, tumor pathologic stage, complications, and outcome. One patient was excluded because of an open conversion due to multiple previous abdominal surgeries and failure to progress. RESULTS The mean operating time was 329 minutes but decreased with experience. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Tumor stage was directly related to tumor grade. Associated bladder tumors (prior history or recurrent tumors) occurred in 50% of the patients. Ipsilateral ureteral stump site recurrence occurred in 1 patient. Although no port site seeding occurred, 1 patient, whose tumor was discovered histologically after laparoscopic pyeloplasty for presumed benign disease, developed recurrence in the renal fossa and metastatic disease. Two patients developed liver metastasis. CONCLUSIONS Total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted nephroureterectomy are acceptable alternatives to open surgery in the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Tumor morcellation did not appear to adversely affect patient outcome. As with open nephroureterectomy, tumor grade is the most important prognostic indicator of local, bladder, and metastatic recurrence. No port site seeding was observed in either the total laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T W Jarrett
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
67
|
Literature Watch. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2000.10.349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|