GIPC recruits GAIP (RGS19) to attenuate dopamine D2 receptor signaling

Cellular mechanisms that determine selective RGS protein regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) bind directly to activated Galpha subunits to inhibit their signaling. However, recent findings show that RGS proteins selectively regulate signaling by certain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in cells, irrespective of the coupled G protein. New studies support an emerging model that suggests RGS proteins utilize both direct and indirect mechanisms to form stable functional pairs with preferred GPCRs to selectively modulate the signaling functions of those receptors and linked G proteins. Here, we discuss these findings and their implications for established models of GPCR signaling.

Mammalian RGS proteins: Multifunctional regulators of cellular signalling

Regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS) proteins are a large and diverse family initially identified as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) of heterotrimeric G-protein Galpha-subunits. At least some can also influence Galpha activity through either effector antagonism or by acting as guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). As our understanding of RGS protein structure and function has developed, so has the realisation that they play roles beyond G-protein regulation. Such diversity of function is enabled by the variety of RGS protein structure and their ability to interact with other cellular molecules including phospholipids, receptors, effectors and scaffolds. The activity, sub-cellular distribution and expression levels of RGS proteins are dynamically regulated, providing a layer of complexity that has yet to be fully elucidated.

Transcriptional changes in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease putamen

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) and sporadic, non-mendelian Parkinson's disease (PD) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders with overlapping clinical symptoms and pathology. The etiology of both disorders is unknown, and complex combinations of multiple susceptibility genes and environmental factors are thought to be involved. Both disorders are characterized by ubiquitous alpha-synuclein aggregates in distinct regions and cell types of the central nervous system. In PD, alpha-synuclein-positive aggregates appear to be largely neuronal while in MSA oligodendroglial inclusions prevail. In PD patients, the alpha-synuclein pathology is thought to evolve in a rather regular pattern, starting in the brainstem and olfactory bulb and extending gradually onto the substantia nigra and ultimately the cerebral cortex while the cerebellum is largely spared. MSA pathology has not been graded in a similar way yet; neuropathological analyses revealed neurodegeneration and gliosis primarily in the brainstem, midbrain and basal ganglia and the cerebellum, while the cortex is largely spared. To identify disease-specific transcriptional patterns in MSA, we chose CNS regions differentially affected in MSA and PD for comparative gene expression profiling: putamen, cerebellum and occipital cortex. Four genes were regulated in both MSA and PD putamen and twelve in MSA and PD cerebellum. Regulated transcripts were validated using real-time quantitative RT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry was performed for the most significantly downregulated transcripts in MSA and PD putamen, GPR86 and RGS14, associated with G protein signaling and transcriptional regulation.

RGS17/RGSZ2 and the RZ/A family of regulators of G-protein signaling

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS proteins) comprise over 20 different proteins that have been classified into subfamilies on the basis of structural homology. The RZ/A family includes RGSZ2/RGS17 (the most recently discovered member of this family), GAIP/RGS19, RGSZ1/RGS20, and the RGSZ1 variant Ret-RGS. The RGS proteins are GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) that turn off G-proteins and thus negatively regulate the signaling of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, some RZ/A family RGS proteins are able to modify signaling through interactions with adapter proteins (such as GIPC and GIPN). The RZ/A proteins have a simple structure that includes a conserved amino-terminal cysteine string motif, RGS box and short carboxyl-terminal, which confer GAP activity (RGS box) and the ability to undergo covalent modification and interact with other proteins (amino-terminal). This review focuses on RGS17 and its RZ/A sibling proteins and discusses the similarities and differences among these proteins in terms of their palmitoylation, phosphorylation, intracellular localization and interactions with GPCRs and adapter proteins. The specificity of these RGS protein for different Galpha proteins and receptors, and the consequences for signaling are discussed. The tissue and brain distribution, and the evolving understanding of the roles of this family of RGS proteins in receptor signaling and brain function are highlighted.

Recent Advances in Molecular Pharmacology of the Histamine Systems: Roles of C-terminal Tails of Histamine Receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) represent a large and diverse superfamily of integral membrane proteins to which histamine receptors belong. Increasing numbers of proteins have been identified to interact with the C-termini of GPCRs. These interactions are implicated in targeting, trafficking, and fine-tuning of signaling of GPCRs. Although the C-terminus of the histamine H2 receptor has been suggested to play in agonist-induced internalization of the receptor, roles of the C-termini of the other three histamine receptors are not known. To date, there is no protein identified to interact with the C-termini of histamine receptors.

The dopamine D2 receptor: new surprises from an old friend

Drugs acting at dopamine D2 receptors (D2R) are commonly used to alleviate symptoms produced by diseases such as Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and depression. A limitation to the use of these drugs is that they sometimes afflict patients with severe side effects. This review discusses recent evidence for several proteins that represent novel mediators of the downstream consequences of D2R activation, since selective targeting of particular D2R-mediated signaling pathways could lead to the development of improved treatments for these devastating diseases.

N-terminally truncated variant of the mouse GAIP/RGS19 lacks selectivity of full-length GAIP/RGS19 protein in regulating ORL1 receptor signaling

The regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) are a family of proteins with conserved RGS domains and play essential roles in regulating G protein-mediated signal transduction and physiological events. GAIP/RGS19 (G alpha interacting protein, also classified as RGS19), a member of the RGS family, has been shown to negatively regulate the signaling of many G protein-coupled receptors, including the opioid receptors. Two GAIP/RGS19 mRNA variants, resulted from an alternative splicing of exon 2 of the GAIP/RGS19 gene, were identified in multiple mouse tissues. One of the transcripts consists of a complete set of exons and encodes a full-length GAIP/RGS19 protein, and the other does not have exon 2 and therefore encodes an N-terminal 22 residue truncated short GAIP/RGS19 protein. When co-expressed with either the opioid-receptor-like (ORL1) receptor or one of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors, by transfecting dual-expression plasmids into COS-7 cells, the full-length GAIP/RGS19 was more effective than the N-terminally truncated variant and was more selective in regulating the ORL1 receptor signaling than in regulating the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors, as measured by the effectiveness to increase the agonist-stimulated GTPase activity and to reverse the agonist-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation. In the same assays, the N-terminally truncated GAIP/RGS19 did not distinguish ORL1 from the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. In contrast, co-expression of RGS4 with either ORL1 or opioid receptors showed the selectivity of RGS4 for regulating opioid receptors was mu > kappa > delta > ORL1, an order completely different from that of GAIP/RGS19. The results suggest that GAIP/RGS19 prefers regulating ORL1 receptor signaling over other opioid receptors, and that the N-terminal domain of GAIP/RGS19 plays a crucial role in its receptor preference.

Selective inhibition of alpha1A-adrenergic receptor signaling by RGS2 association with the receptor third intracellular loop

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins act directly on Galpha subunits to increase the rate of GTP hydrolysis and to terminate signaling. However, the mechanisms involved in determining their specificities of action in cells remain unclear. Recent evidence has raised the possibility that RGS proteins may interact directly with G-protein-coupled receptors to modulate their activity. By using biochemical, fluorescent imaging, and functional approaches, we found that RGS2 binds directly and selectively to the third intracellular loop of the alpha1A-adrenergic receptor (AR) in vitro, and is recruited by the unstimulated alpha1A-AR to the plasma membrane in cells to inhibit receptor and Gq/11 signaling. This interaction was specific, because RGS2 did not interact with the highly homologous alpha1B- or alpha1D-ARs, and the closely related RGS16 did not interact with any alpha1-ARs. The N terminus of RGS2 was required for association with alpha1A-ARs and inhibition of signaling, and amino acids Lys219, Ser220, and Arg238 within the alpha1A-AR i3 loop were found to be essential for this interaction. These findings demonstrate that certain RGS proteins can directly interact with preferred G-protein-coupled receptors to modulate their signaling with a high degree of specificity.