The transverse abdominal island flap: part I. Indications, contraindications, results, and complications

The perforator angiosome: a new concept in the design of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The previously described "perfusion zones" of the abdominal wall vasculature are based on filling of the deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEA) and all its branches simultaneously. With the advent of the DIEA perforator flap, only a single or several perforators are included in supply to the flap. As such, a new model for abdominal wall perfusion has become necessary. The concept of a "perforator angiosome" is thus explored.

METHODS

A clinical and cadaveric study of 155 abdominal walls was undertaken. This comprised the use of 10 whole, unembalmed cadaveric abdominal walls for angiographic studies, and 145 abdominal wall computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) in patients undergoing preoperative imaging of the abdominal wall vasculature. The evaluation of the subcutaneous branching pattern and zone of perfusion of individual DIEA perforators was explored, particularly exploring differences between medial and lateral row perforators.

RESULTS

Fundamental differences exist between medial row and lateral row perforators, with medial row perforators larger (1.3 mm vs. 1 mm) and more likely to ramify in the subcutaneous fat toward the contralateral hemiabdomen (98% of cases vs. 2% of cases). A model for the perfusion of the abdominal wall based on a single perforator is presented.

CONCLUSION

The "perforator angiosome" is dependent on perforator location, and can mapped individually with the use of preoperative imaging.

The pedicled TRAM flap in breast reconstruction

The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap remains a viable option in breast reconstruction. This article documents the history of the TRAM flap and puts in context the vascular anatomy through a discussion of the vascular zones. Options for flap delay are discussed and an algorithm is presented for patient selection. Finally, the issue of unipedicle versus bipedicle flap harvest is discussed and complications are examined.

Breast Reconstruction with Free Flaps from the Abdominal Donor Site—TRAM, DIEAP, and SIEA Flaps

Multiple types of free flap can be elevated from the lower abdominal region for use in breast reconstruction. These include the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, and the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. This sequence of flaps represents an evolution in the protection of the donor site. However, the decision as to which flap may be most appropriate for an individual patient is complex. This article serves to review pertinent surgical anatomy, preoperative planning, intraoperative decision making in flap elevation, and reported outcomes.

Breast reconstruction with alloplastic implants

This article reviews immediate and delayed breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants, and the effect of irradiation therapy. Despite widespread use of breast conserving surgery for early breast cancer, many breast cancer patients still undergo mastectomy. Some of these patients choose breast reconstruction. Over the last 30 years, techniques for breast reconstruction have evolved significantly with new alternative techniques and improved surgical devises. Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis can be an excellent option. Implant reconstruction may be single or two stage procedures. Traditionally, small breasts with minimal ptosis are suited for single-stage reconstruction. Large breasts or inadequate skin require expanders followed by implants. Minimal excision mastectomy and biological spacers are allowing larger breast single stage reconstruction and improved aesthetics for two stage procedures. With recent studies suggesting survival advantage of post-mastectomy irradiation, many candidates for breast reconstruction are receiving radiotherapy, which complicates healing after breast reconstruction.

Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 500 free TRAM flaps performed between 1992 and 2003. This cohort was subdivided based on smoking history, obesity, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiation therapy, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension, and compared surgical complication rates. Measured complications included fat necrosis, mastectomy flap necrosis, abdominal flap necrosis, partial TRAM flap loss, wound infection, hematoma, seroma, vessel thrombosis, and abdominal hernia. Chi2 analysis and Fisher exact test were performed to determine differences between groups, and linear regression models were used to predict the risk factors of surgical complications.

RESULTS

Smokers were more likely to have a higher incidence of wound infection (P = 0.01), mastectomy flap necrosis (P = 0.015), abdominal flap necrosis (P = 0.033), and fat necrosis (P = 0.01). Obese patients were more likely to have higher rates of mastectomy flap necrosis (P = 0.01) and hematoma (P = 0.01). Patients with peripheral vascular disease were more likely to have a higher incidence of wound infection (P = 0.031), and patients with preoperative radiation therapy were more likely to have a higher incidence of seroma (P = 0.043). Logistic regression showed that smoking was found to be a risk factor for fat necrosis (P = 0.006), wound infection (P = 0.002), mastectomy flap necrosis (P = 0.039), and abdominal flap necrosis (P = 0.042). Obesity was a risk factor for mastectomy flap necrosis (P = 0.002). Peripheral vascular disease was a risk factor for wound infection (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Awareness of risk factors and associated complications will lead to modification and individualization of surgical techniques in an attempt to limit these complications and continually improve outcomes.

Obesity Alters Rat Abdominal Flap Survival

Obesity presents a risk factor for flap-related complications in autologous tissue breast reconstruction. In this study, an animal model was developed to examine this phenomenon. Abdominal flaps based on a superficial inferior epigastric pedicle were elevated in an experimental group of obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats (n = 8; mean weight, 413 g) and in their lean littermates (n = 9; mean weight, 276 g). Flap tissue was harvested from a subset of both groups for baseline characterization, including histology, and assays for ATP and oxidative phosphorylation uncoupler, UCP-2. Flaps were then evaluated for survival by planimetry at 4 and 7 days postprocedure. Flap survival 7 days postoperatively was reduced in obese (42.0% ± 8.6%) versus lean (70.3% ± 6.7%) rats ( P < 0.05). At baseline, flap tissue of obese animals had decreased ATP content relative to lean counterparts (0.12 ± 0.12 nM/μg vs 0.36 ± 0.23 nM/μg protein, P < 0.05), whereas UCP2 mRNA was higher in obese flap tissue versus lean. Reduced viability of obese flaps may be attributable to decreased baseline energy stores due to oxidative phosphorylation uncoupling by UCP-2. This study is the first to introduce a promising animal model for examining the effect of obesity on increased flap-related complications in breast reconstruction using autologous tissue.

[The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. A "second defensive line" in microvascular reconstructions of defects in the head and neck area]

BACKGROUND

The microvascular anastomosed transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) island flap has been successfully used in plastic surgery for more than 10 years. In reconstructive head and neck surgery, however, it is not yet established.

METHOD

We analysed the preparation and anatomical variation in TRAM flaps in an examination of eight cadavers. In a clinical case with complete reconstruction of the nose after nasal ablation and complete loss of a radial lower forearm flap that had been transplanted previously due to a recurrent tumor, the possibility of forming and modeling a TRAM flap is demonstrated.

RESULTS

The flap vessels of the TRAM are comparable to the radial forearm flap, and the donor site may be primarily closed. The TRAM proved to be a suitable alternative to close lesions of the head and neck area in selected cases. The myocutaneous TRAM is bulkier than the fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap. The subcutaneous abdominal fat of the TRAM can be reduced in relation to the vascular distribution of the perforator vessels. If the subcutaneous fat of the flap is reduced, the flap can be shaped and formed well. In the described case, it was used to close the lesion after ablation of the nose and middle face.

CONCLUSION

The risk of an iatrogenic lesion of the peritoneal fascia or postsurgical herniation of the abdominal wall is low if several surgical prerequisites are taken into consideration. The myocutaneous TRAM will not replace the fascio-cutaneous radial forearm flap in microvascular head and neck surgery, but the large diameter of the donor vessels and the highly vascularized flap tissue makes it an alternative as a second line procedure in cases of unfavorable wound conditions.

Breast reconstruction

The majority of women who are undergoing mastectomy can also have breast reconstruction. In most breast units, implants and latissimus dorsi flaps can be performed. The more sophisticated transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap-based reconstructions are generally performed by plastic surgeons so that there may be logistic problems in using these techniques for immediate reconstruction. Decisions on technique will also depend on the patient's build and co-existing medical conditions together with the likelihood of need for postoperative radiotherapy as part of the primary local treatment.

Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: a clinical study

BACKGROUND

The Hartrampf perfusion zones of the lower abdominal flap are generally accepted. They were empirically based on the clinical impression of the perfusion in the first 16 unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps and have been uncritically adopted for the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous and the free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Scientific data proving the validity of these perfusion zones do not exist. The objective of this study was to evaluate and quantitatively assess the perfusion zones of the DIEP flap.

METHODS

In a clinical, prospective study of 15 patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction, tissue perfusion was intraoperatively assessed using the method of laser-induced fluorescence of indocyanine green.

RESULTS

Perfusion of zones I, II, and III was seen 25, 41, and 32 seconds, respectively, after injection, and the perfusion index constituted 76, 25, and 47 percent (median) of normal tissue. Perfusion of zone IV was completely absent in five patients (33 percent); in the remaining patients, it was dramatically decreased (5 percent) and occurred with a delay of 67 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the results of this study, the Hartrampf concept of a centrally perfused skin ellipse with declining perfusion of its peripheral ends is wrong and should be revised. Instead, one should think of the lower abdominal flap as two halves separated by the midline. The ipsilateral half has an axial pattern of perfusion; the contralateral half shows a random-pattern, individually variable blood supply. Therefore, the classic Hartrampf zones should be rearranged, switching zones II and III.

Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction

The optimal method for breast reconstruction should be safe, reliable, and accessible for every patient, and it should display little or no donor-site morbidity. After comparing mammary implants it has been found that autogenous breast reconstruction can create a ptotic, soft, symmetrical breast mound. The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (TRAM) remains the most popular method for autogenous reconstruction. Modern trends in breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap have promoted adequate blood supply to the flap while minimizing donor-site defects in the anterior abdominal wall. The pedicled TRAM flap remains one of the most frequently used flaps, but the indirect blood supply in this flap has required many modifications and refinements. Such modifications have included the bipedicled TRAM flap, the free TRAM flap, and the supercharged TRAM flap. To avoid donor-site morbidities, the muscle-sparing free TRAM, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap were introduced. The DIEP perforator flap requires meticulous technique but offers proven reliability and a low rate of complications. As surgeons become more comfortable with harvesting DIEP flaps, the frequency of usage seems likely to increase. The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap, and others may be selected when these modifications of free TRAM flap are unavailable or unusable.

Breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap: Pedicled and free

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a ubiquitous disease affecting one in seven women. While breast conservation techniques are available for local control of the disease for many patients, not all patients are good candidates for these techniques. Mastectomy, therefore, remains a common method of breast cancer treatment. Methods of reconstruction include implant reconstruction and autogenous reconstruction. The advantages of autogenous reconstruction include the creation of a soft, ptotic breast mound, which tends to match a native contralateral breast both in and out of bra support. Autogenous reconstructions do not tend to change with time and usually do not require periodic revision as seen in implant reconstructions.

METHODS

The most common method of autogenous reconstruction is the TRAM flap, either pedicled or free. The TRAM flap employs the redundant excess lower abdominal tissue typically removed during a cosmetic abdominoplasty. This tissue is brought to the mastectomy defect as a pedicled flap, passing subcutaneously from the upper abdomen and into the defect site. The pedicled flap is based upon the superior epigastric vessels. A free TRAM is harvested with the overlying muscle and the attached inferior epigastric vessels. This flap is completely separated from the abdomen and brought to the chest defect where it is anastomosed to either the thoracodorsal or internal mammary vessels. The donor defect within the abdominal wall is repaired with an inlay mesh with both the pedicled and free techniques.

RESULTS

Patient selection criteria usually help determine which technique is used. The advantage of the free flap technique is improved blood supply to the skin island. The free flap, therefore, is used in patients at higher risk for partial flap loss with the pedicled technique. Such high-risk patients include smokers, the obese, patients with significant medical comorbidities, and patients with prior abdominal surgery. Patients without these risk factors can be expected to achieve good results with either the pedicled or free flap technique.

CONCLUSION

Autogenous breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap achieves long lasting satisfactory results in most patients with the creation of a soft, naturally ptotic breast mound, which typically matches well a contralateral native breast.

Analyzing the Vascular Architecture of the Free TRAM Flap Using Intraoperative Ex Vivo Angiography

BACKGROUND

Using ex vivo intraoperative angiography to analyze 14 flaps from 12 breast reconstruction patients, the authors investigated the vascular architecture of free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps nourished by the deep inferior epigastric artery.

METHODS

Contrast medium was injected through the deep inferior epigastric artery and flaps were radiographed to observe their vascular patterns.

RESULTS

TRAM flaps showed one or two segmental arteries stained on their ipsilateral side (zones 1 and 3) and serving as the flap's axial artery. These segmental arteries directly connect to the large perforators (axial perforators) and emerge not only from the paraumbilical perforators but also from the caudal branches of the deep inferior epigastric artery. Arterial density is always lower in the contralateral area (zones 2 and 4) than in the ipsilateral area (zones 1 and 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the cephalic half of zone 2 and all of zone 4 remain unstained, these areas are prone to skin or fat necrosis, especially in high-risk patients. Ex vivo angiography, by providing specific information about the individual flap and by reflecting its flow physiology, enables one to observe and to chart the vascular architecture of free TRAM flaps nourished by the deep inferior epigastric artery.

Radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients undergoing breast reconstruction or augmentation

Due to increasing indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy and a growing demand for breast reconstruction or augmentation, increasing numbers of patients are currently being exposed to both these treatments. In view of the wide range of available techniques for breast reconstruction, either prosthetic or autologous, and their various sequencing in relation to radiotherapy, physicians can be faced with numerous clinical situations requiring comprehensive knowledge of the topic. This review discusses physical, radiobiological and clinical aspects of combining breast reconstruction and radiotherapy. The available data indicate the feasibility of such combinations, although at the expense of increased risk of complications and less satisfactory cosmesis. Of the two methods of breast reconstruction: using autologous tissue or prosthesis, the former seems to provide better cosmesis and a lower risk of complications in conjunction with radiotherapy. To minimize the risk of unfavourable outcome, the techniques and timing of both breast reconstruction and radiotherapy should be given meticulous attention.

Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates

In cases of unilateral breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, poorly perfused tissue, which is normally excised to avoid subsequent fat necrosis, must sometimes be used to achieve adequate breast size and projection. In such cases, incorporation of a second vascular pedicle into the flap design improves perfusion. The authors retrospectively examined their experience with bipedicled TRAM flap-based unilateral breast reconstruction to determine whether the use of microsurgical rather than conventional (nonmicrosurgical) techniques for flap transfer resulted in lower incidences of flap-site fat necrosis and donor-site hernia/bulge. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a bipedicled TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap between January of 1991 and March of 2001. Group 1 consisted of patients who had undergone flap transfer using a conventional technique for both pedicles; group 2, patients who had flap transfer using a conventional technique for one pedicle and a microsurgical technique for the other; and group 3, patients who had flap transfer using a microsurgical technique for both pedicles. Of the 863 patients identified, 72 (8.3 percent) had undergone reconstruction using a bipedicled flap. There were 43 patients in group 1, 24 patients in group 2, and five patients in group 3. Only one case of total flap loss had occurred (group 1). Partial flap loss occurred in two patients in group 1 (5 percent) and three patients in group 2 (13 percent). Fat necrosis occurred more frequently in groups 1 (23 percent) and 2 (29 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.5, Fisher's exact test). Similarly, bulge or hernia was more common in groups 1 (12 percent) and 2 (4 percent) than in group 3 (0 percent) (p = 0.6, Fisher's exact test). In this study, patients who received a bipedicled TRAM flap using microsurgical techniques alone (group 3) appeared to have better flap perfusion and less frequent hernia/bulge than did patients who underwent flap transfer using conventional (group 1) or combined techniques (group 2). However, these differences were not statistically significant, and this trend must be verified in a larger study.

Chest wall reconstruction and advanced disease

Clinical experience supports a role for palliative procedures in patients with locally advanced or recurrent breast cancer, yet numerous challenges are entailed in both the extirpation and reconstruction of the chest wall in these cases. The defects may be profound and complicated by prior surgery, radiation therapy, or patient-related variables. The reconstructive techniques employed must neither encumber nor delay any necessary postoperative therapy and must not result in unacceptable morbidity or compromise quality of life. Our surgical approach to these cases incorporates a team of specialists from a broad spectrum of medical and surgical disciplines. Each operative plan is tailored to the specific needs and requirements of the individual patient.

Do pre-operative abdominal exercises prevent post-operative donor site complications for women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction? A two-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard for breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue. Unlike the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, no rectus abdominis muscle is removed with the flap, but intra-muscular scarring can still cause post-operative complications. Strong abdominal muscles have been advocated as a prerequisite for surgery, but without any evidence as to the potential benefits. This study aimed to investigate the effect of pre-operative abdominal exercises on inpatient pain levels, length of hospital stay, post-operative abdominal muscle strength and function following a DIEP flap.Ninety-three women undergoing delayed breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap between October 1999 and November 2000 were randomly allocated to either a control or exercise group. The exercise group performed pre-operative exercises using the Abdotrim abdominal exerciser. Pre-operatively, outcome measures included trunk muscle strength measured on an isokinetic dynamometer, SF-36, rectus muscle thickness measured using ultrasound, and submaximal fitness. Post-operative pain and length of hospital stay were recorded. Subjects were reassessed using the same outcome measures 1 year post-operatively. There was a statistically significant increase in static (isometric) muscle strength and thickness pre-operatively for the exercise group. One year following surgery, there was a significant decrease in dynamic (concentric and eccentric) flexion strength for both groups, although the clinical significance of this is questionable as the majority of women had returned to pre-operative fitness and the surgery had no impact on functional activities. The static flexion strength of the control group was reduced at 1 year, whereas it was maintained in the exercise group, although this was not statistically significant. One third of women in the control group complained of functional problems or abdominal pain post-operatively compared to one fifth of the exercise group. Overall, the DIEP flap had no major impact on abdominal muscle strength for either group, demonstrating its superiority over the TRAM flap. There was no statistically significant benefit to the exercise group of the pre-operative exercises 1 year following surgery. However, there was a subjective benefit, albeit statistically nonsignificant, in terms of reduced functional problems post-operatively and improved well-being prior to surgery.

Anterolateral thigh flap: an ideal soft tissue flap

Microsurgical reconstruction has evolved to a stage where a nearly 100% success rate has been achieved. Therefore, refinement of the functional and aesthetic result, as well as a decrease in donor site morbidity have become the major concerns. The anterolateral thigh flap meets these requirements; its wide application to various fields is based on the following charateristics. Its reliable vascularity. Its vascular pedicle is long and large, at least 8 cm (can be 20 cm). Flap territory is large and easy to design. The pedicle can be at the periphery of the flap. Its length can be 40 cm and its width can be half of the thigh, with the maximal dimension as large as 40 x 20 cm (800 cm2). Primary trimming of the flap to 3 mm to 5 mm in thickness does not compromise its vascularity. The subcutaneous fat can be included to facilitate gliding of the underlying tendons. To harvest chimeric flaps, the following components can be included: muscles, fascia and bone (an osseous flap can be joined to the flap with microvascular anastomoses). A two-team approach is possible, because the recipient site is usually far away from the donor site. Usually it does not require that the patient change position. It can be closed primarily without skin graft if its width is less than 8 cm. The donor site is easily covered with clothes, and the motor function is least affected. Care should be taken in flap dissection, inset, and postoperative care, as well as strategies for re-exploration.

Extended TRAM flap: feasibility study on fresh human cadavers

The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a superiorly based TRAM flap for breast reconstruction with its superior border abutting the inframammary fold. This flap would have a primary blood supply from the superior epigastric vessels, similar to a free flap attached to the mammary system. This flap, however, would not require microsurgery. Instead, it would have its superior epigastric pedicle lengthened by partial rib resection. Donor site closure would be accomplished by reverse abdominoplasty and the donor scar hidden in the inframammary fold. The surgical anatomy of such an extended TRAM flap (eTRAM) was investigated by cannulation of the internal mammary artery (IMA) in 10 fresh human cadavers bilaterally, injection with latex, and then dissection throughout its intrathoracic course. At the level of the third intercostal space, the mean external diameters of the right and left IMA were found to be 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. The diameter of the vessel decreased until the IMA bifurcated into the superior epigastric artery and the musculophrenic artery, usually at the sixth intercostal space. The superior epigastric artery, having a mean diameter of 1.6 mm at its origin, descended caudally behind the seventh costal cartilage and could be followed until it entered the posterior rectus sheath and the rectus abdominis muscle. On its downward course, it was not embedded in the diaphragm muscle and was easily separated without violation of the thoracic cavity. From this anatomic study, it seems to be possible to raise an eTRAM after partial rib resection. Some technical considerations of such a flap are discussed. This modification of the TRAM would be helpful to surgeons commonly performing pedicled TRAM flaps and might extend its applicability beyond breast reconstruction to chest wall, intrathoracic, and head and neck reconstruction.

Bimodal distribution of the blood supply to lower abdominal fat: histological study of the microcirculation of the lower abdominal wall

Fat necrosis is a common postoperative complication in transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. A histological quantification of the blood supply to the lower abdominal fat was undertaken to define this problem further. One hundred eighty sections, 1.5 cm(2) in size, were studied from one half of the lower abdomen in 10 fresh cadavers. These represent three different depths of fat (superficial, middle, deep) and six different anatomic areas (upper, middle, and lower sectors of the medial and lateral parts of the hemiabdomen). The average diameter, number of blood vessels, and the total vascular area were measured in each section. The average diameter of the blood vessels was greater in the superficial compared with the mid fat layer (p = 0.02). The total vascular area was greater in the deep compared with the mid fat layer (p = 0.01) and the superficial fat layer (p = 0.05). The number of blood vessels was also significantly higher in the deep fat layer compared with the mid fat layer (p = 0.001) and the superficial fat layer (p = 0.01). The lower medial area of the lower anterior abdominal wall contained the largest number and average diameter of blood vessels whereas the mid lateral area contained the smallest number and average diameter; however, this did not reach significance (p = 0.1 and 0.2). The results of this study are in keeping with the bimodal vascular supply to the subcutaneous fat of the anterior abdominal wall. The deep and the superficial fat layers are supplied more richly with vessels with a larger diameter whereas the intermediate fat layer is supplied from the terminal branches of these vessels.

Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study

In this study, the effects of procedure type, timing, and other clinical variables on complication rates in mastectomy reconstruction were prospectively evaluated. Using a prospective cohort design, women undergoing first-time, immediate or delayed breast reconstruction were recruited from 12 centers and 23 plastic surgeons. Complication data for expander/implant, pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, and free TRAM flap procedures were evaluated 2 years after surgery in 326 patients. For each patient, the total number of complications was recorded and the complication data were dichotomized in two ways: (1) total complications and (2) major complications (those requiring reoperation, rehospitalization, or nonperioperative intravenous antibiotic treatment). The effects of procedure type, timing, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, age, smoking, and body mass index on complication rates were analyzed using logistic regression. Immediate reconstructions had significantly higher total as well as major complication rates, compared with delayed procedures (p = 0.011 and 0.005, respectively). Furthermore, higher body mass indexes were associated with significantly higher total and major complication rates (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant effects on complication rates were noted for procedure type or for the other independent variables, although there was evidence of trends for higher total and major complication rates in implant patients who received radiotherapy and a trend for higher major complication rates in TRAM flap patients who received chemotherapy. It was concluded that (1) immediate reconstructions were associated with significantly higher complication rates than delayed procedures, and (2) procedure type had no significant effect on complication rates.

Donor site sequelae after autologous breast reconstruction with an extended latissimus dorsi flap

The indications for autologous reconstruction are increasing. The standard procedure is the transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap; however, this flap has contraindications and drawbacks. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is simple and reliable. Hokin et al. demonstrated in 1983 that this flap can be extended and used for breast reconstruction without an implant. Since then, it has been widely studied in this setting and is known to provide good aesthetic results. Dorsal sequelae, conversely, were not appraised. The aim of this study was to assess objective and subjective dorsal sequelae after the harvest of an extended flap. Forty-three consecutive patients who had had breast reconstruction with an autologous latissimus dorsi flap were assessed by a surgeon and a physiotherapist for muscular strength and shoulder mobility. Patient opinion was studied through a questionnaire. Mean delay between the operation and the evaluation was 19 months. Early complications, mainly dorsal seromas, were frequent after the harvest of an extended flap (72 percent). There was no late morbidity and, especially, no flap loss or partial necrosis. As for functional results, 37 percent of the patients had complete adjustment and 70 to 87 percent demonstrated no change in shoulder strength. Sixty percent of the patients experienced no limitation in everyday life, and 90 percent said they would undergo this procedure again. The authors show that dorsal sequelae after an extended latissimus dorsi flap are minimal and that this technique compares favorably with the transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap.

Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient

Obesity can be a contraindication for TRAM flap breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the authors' experience with free TRAM and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient to examine the complication rates associated with each reconstructive method and to determine whether TRAM flap reconstruction can safely be used in these high-risk patients. The records of 221 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors for morbidity were noted, as well as the incidence of TRAM flap success, operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Patients were categorized as obese if their body mass index was greater than 25.8 kg/m2. Data were tabulated using contingency tables and analyzed using chi-squared statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for flap complications. Of the 221 patients studied, 114 patients were found to be obese (body mass index >25.8 kg/m2). Of these 114 patients, 78 were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 36 were reconstructed with pedicled flaps. In these obese patients, the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2 in the free TRAM and 30 kg/m2 in the pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age or preoperative risk factors. Length of hospital stay and operative time did not differ significantly between the two reconstructive methods. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months in both groups. Complications occurred in 26 percent of free TRAM flap reconstructions and 33 percent of pedicled reconstructions. There was no significant difference between reconstructive methods with regard to overall complication rates. Increasing body mass index was found to have a significant effect on free TRAM flap complications (p = 0.008) but not on pedicled TRAM flap complications. There were no partial or total flap losses in obese free TRAM flap patients; however, there was one case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss in the obese pedicled TRAM flap group. The incidence of flap loss was significantly higher when pedicled TRAM flaps were used for reconstruction in obese patients (p = 0.04). Obese patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps were more likely to experience a complication if they also smoked (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in operating time or length of stay when pedicled and free TRAM flap reconstructions in obese patients were compared. There were more cases of flap necrosis in the pedicled TRAM flap group. Free TRAM flaps may provide some benefit in reducing partial flap loss in obese patients, but overall complication rates were not significantly different between reconstructive methods. Of 114 patients, there was only one case of total reconstructive failure. From these findings, it seems that the free or pedicled TRAM flap can be used successfully for breast reconstruction in the majority of patients with obesity. Surgeons should use the technique with which they are most familiar to obtain consistent results.

Microvascular reconstruction of the breast

The growth of microsurgical procedures has led to significant technological, scientific, and clinical advances that have made these procedures safe, reliable, reproducible, and routine in most major medical centers. In many instances, free flap reconstruction has become the primary reconstructive method for many major defects, including breast reconstruction. The advantages of free flap breast reconstruction include better flap vascularity, broader patient selection, easier insetting of the flap, and decreased donor site morbidity. Free flap breast reconstruction can occur either at the time that the mastectomy is performed or as a delayed reconstruction following a previous mastectomy. Immediate reconstructions have the advantage of avoiding scar contracture and fibrosis within the mastectomy flaps and at the recipient vessel site. The most common recipient vessel sites are the thoracodorsal vessels and the internal mammary vessels. The thoracodorsal vessels are most frequently used in immediate reconstruction because they are partially exposed during the mastectomy procedure. The internal mammary vessels are used more frequently in delayed reconstructions, to avoid repeat surgery in the axilla. This recipient site also allows more medial placement of the reconstruction. Flap selections for free autogenous breast reconstruction include the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap, the superior gluteal myocutaneous flap, the inferior gluteal myocutaneous flap, the lateral thigh flap, and the deep circumflex iliac soft tissue flap (Rubens). The TRAM flap is most commonly used in free flap breast reconstruction. For patients with inadequate abdominal tissue or prior abdominal surgery, the superior gluteal flap is typically used. Both the TRAM flap and the superior gluteal flap can be designed as perforator flaps, preserving all of the involved muscle and, in the TRAM perforator, all the rectus fascia. These flaps are more technically demanding, with minimal impact on donor site function. The other flaps are less frequently used and limited to special patient circumstances. Free flap autogenous breast reconstruction provides a natural, long-lasting result with a high degree of patient satisfaction. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 19:264-271, 2000.

A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap

Abdominal weakness is a known potential complication of breast reconstruction with a pedicled or free TRAM flap. It has been presumed that the DIEP flap, which involves no muscle resection, does not compromise abdominal muscle strength but little objective research exists to substantiate this. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare abdominal muscle strength following free TRAM flap and DIEP flap, to compare both groups with a control group and to establish the effect of both procedures on functional activities. Fifty women (23 with a DIEP flap, 27 with a free TRAM flap) plus 32 non-operated controls underwent assessment of their abdominal and back extensor muscle strength on a KIN COM isokinetic dynamometer. Two questionnaires were used to establish the impact on function. The TRAM flap group had significant weakness of the abdominal and back extensor muscles compared with the DIEP flap group and the control group. The trend was for the DIEP flap group to have weaker abdominal muscles than the control group. There was a higher level of abdominal pain and a greater number of reported functional difficulties in the TRAM flap group than in the DIEP flap group. This study demonstrates that whilst the DIEP flap can reduce the strength deficit caused by the free TRAM flap, abdominal weakness can still result from the DIEP flap. A randomised controlled trial is currently underway to investigate the effect of preoperative abdominal exercises in preventing/minimising postoperative abdominal muscle weakness in this group.

Internal mammary artery and vein supercharge in TRAM flap breast reconstruction

To improve the blood supply of the pedicled flap we have performed an additional microvascular augmentation to this type of breast reconstruction procedure since 1991. The ipsilateral deep inferior epigastric pedicle is anastomosed to the internal mammary artery and vein (IMAV supercharge). In 19 of 20 patients this technique proved to be feasible. For the venous anastomoses the 3M microvascular anastomosis system facilitated the procedure. In one patient the venous anastomosis failed due to the small calibre of two internal mammary veins. In a majority of the cases rapid improvement of flap perfusion could be observed as the direct result of the supercharging. The IMAV supercharged flap is quite comparable with the free flap as regards to the operative procedure. Disadvantages are a slightly more extensive dissection and less freedom in positioning the flap due to the presence of the superior muscular pedicle. The main advantage is that the supercharge procedure minimises the risk of total flap loss. Further technical improvement may be obtained by the use of a contralateral vascular pedicle dissected with muscle-sparing techniques.

An ipsilateral superdrainaged transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction

A conventional single pedicled TRAM (transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous) flap is a musculocutaneous flap widely used for breast reconstruction. However, complications such as partial flap necrosis, fat necrosis, and fatty induration may occur as a result of unstable blood flow circulation to the flap. One major factor is venous congestion in the flap. In an effort to obtain more stable TRAM flap blood circulation, we anastomosed the ipsilateral deep inferior epigastric vein of a pedicled TRAM flap to the thoracodorsal vein. This procedure provides superdrainage by means of enhanced venous perfusion. This flap with superdrainage augmentation is referred to as a superdrainaged TRAM flap (12 patients). Changes in cutaneous blood flow were also assessed by measurement of cutaneous blood flow in zone IV using a laser blood flow meter (8 patients). The patients who underwent breast reconstructive surgery using this technique showed no evidence of postoperative complications such as flap necrosis, fat necrosis, or fatty induration. Satisfactory results were obtained during breast reconstruction in patients who had previously undergone a radical mastectomy with resultant large areas of tissue defects. In addition, the two patient groups, 12 patients with superdrainaged TRAM flap and 20 patients with single pedicled TRAM flap, were compared to assess differences in complications. The incidence of partial flap necrosis, fat necrosis, and fatty induration was lower among patients with superdrainaged flap than those with single pedicled flap.

Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study

The main disadvantage when the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is used for breast reconstruction is the potential for weakening of the abdominal wall. This prospective study was initiated to objectively evaluate abdominal muscle strength after pedicled and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions over time. Twenty-three patients with pedicled TRAM flaps and 19 patients with free TRAM flaps were included. A dynamic dynamometer system, KIN-COM, was used to measure maximal voluntary trunk flexor and extensor strength preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The patients' subjective opinions 1 year postoperatively were recorded by means of a questionnaire. A transient decrease in abdominal strength, in both groups, occurred at 6 months but was essentially regained at 12 months. The use of a pedicled or free TRAM flap did not influence postoperative abdominal strength per se. The balance between the abdominal strength and back strength remained in the free flap group but was altered postoperatively in the pedicled flap group; back strength was increased and remained so after 12 months. The difference between the two procedures is relatively small compared with individual variations, indicating that there are more important factors than the kind of surgery influencing the restoration of muscle strength. The questionnaire revealed a greater occurrence of abdominal wall bulging in the free flap group (82 percent) versus 48 percent in the pedicled flap group. No postoperative differences regarding exercise frequency or sensitivity of the abdominal wall were found between the pedicled and free TRAM flap groups.

Indices of obesity and behaviour of the pedicled tram flap in breast reconstruction

The association between obesity and the outcome of pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps was studied in 12 patients. Obesity was assessed preoperatively by body mass index (BMI) and waist:hip circumference ratio (WHCR). The thickness of the abdominal fat and muscles was measured preoperatively with ultrasonography on the abdomen and during the nine postoperative months on the flap. Marginal or fat necrosis was more common among patients with lower body type fat distribution (WHCR less than 0.80) than in patients with medium or upper body type fat distribution. BMI and abdominal muscle and fat thicknesses were not associated with marginal or fat necrosis of the flaps. We conclude that lower body (female type) fat distribution may be associated with marginal cutaneous or fat necrosis in pedicled TRAM flaps.

Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared skin-sparing mastectomy and traditional mastectomy both followed by immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Skin-sparing mastectomy is used increasingly in the treatment of breast cancer to improve the aesthetic results of immediate reconstruction. The oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of this procedure have never been analyzed closely.

METHODS

Institutional experience with 435 consecutive patients who underwent total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction from January 1989 through December 1994 was examined. Mastectomies were stratified into skin-sparing (SSM) and non-skin-sparing (non-SSM) types.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-seven SSMs and 188 non-SSMs were performed. The mean follow-up was 41.3 months (SSM, 37.5 months, non-SSM, 48.2 months). Local recurrences from invasive cancer occurred after 4.8% of SSMs versus 9.5% of non-SSMs. Sixty-five percent of patients who underwent SSMs had nothing performed on the opposite breast versus 45% in the group of patients who underwent non-SSM (p = 0.0002). Native skin flap necrosis occurred in 10.7% of patients who underwent SSMs versus 11.2% of patients who underwent non-SSMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin-sparing mastectomy facilitates immediate breast reconstruction by reducing remedial surgery on the opposite breast. Native skin flap necrosis is not increased over that seen with non-SSM. Skin-sparing mastectomies can be used in the treatment of invasive cancer without compromising local control.

TRAM flaps in patients with abdominal scars

Of 114 patients who had TRAM flap breast reconstruction, 46 (40 percent) had preexisting abdominal surgical scars. Sixty-six free TRAM flaps and 9 pedicled TRAM flaps were performed in the 46 patients. The records were analyzed to determine what impact, if any, abdominal scars had on postoperative complications. There were no reconstructive failures or significant (>25 percent) flap losses. Eight minor complications occurred in 7 patients (15 percent). The incidences of abdominal-wall weakness (4.3 percent), partial flap loss (4.3 percent), minor fat necrosis (4.3 percent), and donor-site wound problems (4.3 percent) were acceptable. Subcostal scars and multiple abdominal scars were found to predispose to skin complications. Right lower paramedian scars precluded free TRAM flaps because of damage to the inferior epigastric vessels in three of three patients. Both obesity (p = 0.003) and smoking (p = 0.05) were associated with a greater risk of wound-healing complications. We conclude that with certain technical modifications, TRAM flap reconstruction is a safe and effective procedure in patients with abdominal scars.

Internal mammary vessels: a reliable recipient system for free flaps in breast reconstruction

In breast reconstruction with a free flap following mastectomy, the recipient vessels most widely used are in the axillary system, which limits flap movement and flexibility in breast shaping. In addition, scarring and fibrosis can make dissection of the vessels difficult. We have performed 22 breast reconstructions using a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap anastomosed to the internal mammary (thoracic) vessels. There has been no flap failure. The surgical techniques and the advantages and limitations of the internal mammary system are presented and the internal mammary vessels compared with the axillary vessels as a recipient vascular system.