Liver packing for uncontrolled hemorrhage: a reappraisal

Evolution in the management of hepatic trauma: a 25-year perspective

OBJECTIVE

To define the changes in demographics of liver injury during the past 25 years and to document the impact of treatment changes on death rates.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

No study has presented a long-term review of a large series of hepatic injuries, documenting the effect of treatment changes on outcome. A 25-year review from a concurrently collected database of liver injuries documented changes in treatment and outcome.

METHODS

A database of hepatic injuries from 1975 to 1999 was studied for changes in demographics, treatment patterns, and outcome. Factors potentially responsible for outcome differences were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 1,842 liver injuries were treated. Blunt injuries have dramatically increased; the proportion of major injuries is approximately 16% annually. Nonsurgical therapy is now used in more than 80% of blunt injuries. The death rates from both blunt and penetrating trauma have improved significantly through each successive decade of the study. The improved death rates are due to decreased death from hemorrhage. Factors responsible include fewer major venous injuries requiring surgery, improved outcome with vein injuries, better results with packing, and effective arterial hemorrhage control with arteriographic embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment and outcome of liver injuries have changed dramatically in 25 years. Multiple modes of therapy are available for hemorrhage control, which has improved outcome.

Management of liver trauma

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Management of blunt or penetrating injuries to the liver remains a significant challenge. This review discusses the mechanisms of liver injury, grading system for severity, available diagnostic modalities and current management options. It is based on a Medline literature search and the authors' clinical experience.

RESULTS

Unstable patients require immediate laparotomy, but selected patients who are haemo- dynamically stable may be managed without operation. The preferred operative techniques include resectional debridement, hepatotomy with direct suture ligation and perihepatic packing; anatomical resection, hepatic artery ligation and various bypass techniques have a limited, more defined role for selected injuries. Major complications include haemorrhage, sepsis and bile leak.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced resuscitation, anaesthesia and intensive care have contributed to a significant reduction in mortality rates from liver trauma. Optimum results are obtained with a specialist team that includes an experienced liver surgeon, anaesthetist, endoscopist and interventional hepatobiliary radiologist with expertise in managing postoperative complications.

Dry fibrin sealant dressings reduce blood loss, resuscitation volume, and improve survival in hypothermic coagulopathic swine with grade V liver injuries

OBJECTIVE

The majority of early trauma deaths are caused by uncontrolled hemorrhage, and are frequently complicated by hypothermic and dilutional coagulopathies. Any hemorrhage-control technique that achieves rapid hemostasis despite a coagulopathy should improve the outcome of these patients. We conducted this study to determine whether dry fibrin sealant dressings (DFSD) would stop bleeding from grade V liver injuries in swine that were hypothermic and coagulopathic.

METHODS

Nineteen swine weighing 39.7 kg (mean and 95% confidence interval, 36.3-43.1), underwent a 60% isovolemic, hypothermic exchange transfusion with 33 degrees C 6% hetastarch to produce a dilutional and hypothermic coagulopathy. The animals then received a grade V liver injury and one of three treatments: DFSD, conventional liver packing with gauze sponges, or immunoglobulin G (IgG) placebo sealant dressing (blinded control). All animals were resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution to their preinjury mean arterial pressure. Blood loss after treatment, mean arterial pressure, resuscitation volume, hematologic variables, and core temperature were monitored for 1 hour.

RESULTS

At the time of injury, core temperature = 33.3 degrees C (95% confidence interval, 33.2-33.4), hemoglobin concentration = 4.4 g/dL (4.2-4.6), platelet count = 132 x 10(5)/microL, (93-171), prothrombin time = 21.6 seconds (19.6-23.5), activated partial thromboplastin time = 25.2 seconds (range, 22.9-27.5 seconds), and fibrinogen = 83 mg/dL (range, 76-89 mg/dL) across treatments. The posttreatment blood loss in the DFSD group was 669 mL, (range, 353-1,268 mL), which was lower (p < 0.01) than the means of 3,321 mL (range, 1,891-5,831 mL) and 4,399 mL (range, 2,321-8,332 mL) observed in the packing and IgG groups, respectively. The resuscitation volume in DFSD was 2,145 mL (range 1,310-3,514 mL), which was lower (p < 0.05) than the means of 5,222 mL (range 3,381-8,067 mL) and 5,542 mL (range 3,384-9,077 mL) in the packing and IgG groups, respectively. One-hour survival in the DFSD group was 83%, whereas survival in the packing and IgG groups were 0% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In swine with a grade V liver injury complicated by a dilutional and hypothermic coagulopathy, DFSD provided simple, rapid hemorrhage control, decreased fluid requirements, and improved survival.

The management of blunt liver injuries

Although the general surgeon who takes emergency call may be confronted with a patient who has sustained a blunt liver injury, the decrease in road trauma and work-place accidents has meant that this will be an infrequent occurrence. Minimal exposure will, of necessity, extrapolate to difficulty in coping with a catastrophic event which comes unheralded, at an inconvenient time and usually when there is less than ideal support. During the past 15 years, there has been an evolution in the treatment of liver injuries which is exemplified by a non-operative approach in selected patients and more conservative procedures in those who require operative intervention. At present, 'damage control' is in vogue; do the least possible to control life-threatening injuries and come back another day. This is a cogent and admirable philosophy, provided that the pendulum does not swing too far and that a planned course of action is in place. This paper reviews the present status of managing blunt liver injuries, with an emphasis on the general surgeon who has little cause to be involved with surgery of the liver.

Effect of dry fibrin sealant dressings versus gauze packing on blood loss in grade V liver injuries in resuscitated swine

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to determine whether the dry fibrin sealant dressing (DFSD) would stop bleeding from a grade V liver injury and to evaluate the effects of leaving the absorbable DFSD in survival animals.

METHODS

Twenty-four swine (40+/-3.0 kg) received a uniform grade V liver injury and were randomized to one of four 1-hour treatment groups: (1) gauze packing, (2) DFSD, (3) immunoglobulin G placebo dressing, and (4) no treatment. All animals were resuscitated with lactated Ringer's solution. Total blood loss (TBL), mean arterial pressure, resuscitation volume, and laboratory data were monitored for 1 hour after injury. Four swine were treated with the DFSD after grade V injury and allowed to survive for 7 or 14 days.

RESULTS

The TBL was 1,104+/-264 mL (mean +/- SEM), 544+/-104 mL, 4,223+/-1,555 mL, and 6,026+/-1,020 mL for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. TBL in DFSD animals was less than that in animals treated with gauze packing (p = 0.06). Grade V injuries were uniform among the 1-hour groups, and no evidence of intrahepatic abscess, unusual adhesions, or hepatic vein, vena caval, or pulmonary thromboses were noted in the long-term survival animals.

CONCLUSION

In this model of grade V liver injury, blood loss with the DFSD was 51% of that observed with standard gauze packing (not statistically different). Initial survival data revealed no complications attributable to the fibrin dressing. DFSD may provide simple, rapid, and definitive hemorrhage control in life-threatening liver injuries without the need for reoperation.

Iatrogenic hepatic rupture in the newborn and its management by pack tamponade

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This report compares the ultrastructure of the newborn and adult liver and emphasizes that the newborn liver is very prone to iatrogenic rupture resulting in a high morbidity and mortality. This study describes the methods used to treat this condition and suggests that pack tamponade may be the method of choice to control hemorrhage.

METHODS

latrogenic liver rupture with blood loss greater than 35% estimated blood volume occurred in seven patients. Cause of rupture included perihepatic dissection (left lobe mobilization [n = 2], capsule breached surgically [n = 1]), and retraction (n = 3) or prosthetic silo manipulation (n = 1).

RESULTS

Initial attempts to control the hemorrhage were unsuccessful in six of seven patients. The only secure method to obtain long-term control of the bleeding was perihepatic pack tamponade. Control was incomplete in one patient who had an associated coagulopathy. Transfusion-induced clotting defects were present in four cases. Pack removal at 24 to 96 hours was successful in five of six patients where the bleeding was stopped, the patient fully stabilized and coagulopathy was corrected. Pack removal caused renewed bleeding in one patient, and repacking was unsuccessful. Ultrastructural differences between newborn and adult livers were investigated. The newborn liver contains little fibrous stroma and has a very thin capsule. Suture hepatorraphy therefore is an inappropriate technique in most instances and contraindicated if a coagulopathy is present. Surface coagulation and pack tamponade may be the only options available. A single patient in this series survived this complication.

CONCLUSIONS

This review documents the serious nature of iatrogenic liver injury. Blood loss must be strictly limited by obtaining immediate control of the hemorrhage. If surface control is unsuccessful, pack tamponade should be used. Suturing the newborn liver (especially premature) produces unpredictable results. These observations suggest that pack tamponade is an effective method of controlling bleeding from the liver surface.

Postoperative care and complications of damage control surgery

Damage control procedures are being used with increasing frequency as the physiologic limits of the surgical patient are approached and recognized. These patients are returned to the SICU, where rapid restoration of circulating volume, normothermia, maintenance of oxygen delivery, and correction of transfusion-associated coagulopathy are essential to the success of the technique, which requires expeditious reoperation and completion of definitive surgical management. The potential need for early return to the operating room to control surgical bleeding must be recognized, as well as the difficulty in distinguishing between surgical bleeding and ongoing hemorrhage due to hypothermia and coagulopathy. Because the damage control technique is resource intensive and involves numerous personnel, organization and leadership are important to success.

The damage control sequence and underlying logic

With the growing understanding of the pathophysiology of exsanguination has come the evolution of extraordinary surgical techniques designed to improve survival. As the success of damage control has grown, so has its acceptance in the traditional surgical community. Our challenge now is to scientifically define patient selection, refine intraoperative techniques, and acquire a greater clinical and basic science understanding of the physiology of exsanguination and reperfusion injury in resuscitation. In these efforts, overall survival should continue to increase and morbidity should continue to decrease.

Intrahepatic absorbable fine mesh packing of hepatic injuries: preliminary clinical report

A previous report from the authors' institution reported the effectiveness of hepatic packing with absorbable fine mesh (AFMP) for the control of hemorrhage in an animal model with an otherwise lethal hepatic injury. The technique has subsequently been applied to 12 abdominal trauma patients with hemodynamic instability and actively hemorrhaging hepatic injuries. Two patients expired in the operating room owing to uncontrolled hemorrhage from hepatic and associated injuries for a mortality of 16.7%. AFMP was successful in controlling hemorrhage in the remaining 10 patients. Hepatic injuries ranged from grade II to grade V, and all were actively hemorrhaging at the time of exploration. None of the surviving 10 patients experienced early or late recurrent bleeding attributable to the hepatic injuries, and there were no intraabdominal abscesses or late deaths. Liver function studies returned to normal prior to discharge in all surviving patients. Follow-up included serial computed tomographic scans, which demonstrated fibrosis incorporating the mesh packing. Complete resolution of injury and mesh appears to proceed over approximately a 6-month period. AFMP is a safe, effective method for controlling hepatic hemorrhage. It is easy to perform in the operating room, offers an excellent matrix for hemostasis, provides tamponade of bleeding sites, and does not require reoperation for removal of packing material, as is necessary with conventional, nonabsorbable packing techniques.

Surgical treatment of liver injury with an absorbable mesh: an experimental study

Uncontrollable bleeding remains a life-threatening problem in severe liver injury. The application of an absorbable mesh has been reported in a small number of patients. To evaluate an absorbable mesh wrap in standardized conditions, we performed an experimental study in 14 female pigs. A standard liver laceration imitating a blunt injury grade IV (Liver Injury Scale of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) was made in all animals. Heparin was administered to mimic coagulopathy. After randomization, seven animals received a polyglycolic acid (Vicryl) mesh wrap to control bleeding. Seven animals served as controls. Six of seven animals with a mesh wrap survived. Six of seven animals in the control group died (p = 0.02, Fisher's exact test). Intrahepatic pressures in the treated group varied from 3 to 55 mm Hg. Liver function tests in surviving animals were temporarily elevated. Necropsy at 2 weeks demonstrated adhesions to the wrapped lobe, but no hematoma, free bile, or abscess. Histologic examination showed a foreign-body reaction to the mesh and necrotic parts in the liver. It is concluded that an absorbable mesh wrap can effectively control bleeding from severe liver injury and improve survival in an animal model, although it may cause some damage to liver tissue.

The staged celiotomy for trauma. Issues in unpacking and reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the important clinical events and decisions surrounding the reconstruction/unpacking portion of the staged celiotomy for trauma.

METHODS

Of 13,817 consecutive trauma admissions, 1175 received trauma celiotomies. Of these, 107 patients (9.1%) underwent staged celiotomy with abdominal packing. The authors examined medical records to identify and characterize: (1) indications and timing of reconstruction, (2) criteria for emergency return to the operating room, (3) complications after reconstruction, and (4) abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (54.2%) survived to reconstruction, 43 (74.1%) survived to discharge; 9 patients (15.5%) were returned to the operating room for bleeding; 13 patients required multiple packing procedures. There were 117 complications; 8 patients had positive blood cultures, abdominal abscesses developed in 6 patients, and ACS developed in 16 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Reconstruction should occur after temperature, coagulopathy, and acidosis are corrected, usually within 36 hours after the damage control procedure. 2. Emergent reoperation should occur in any normothermic patient with unabated bleeding (greater than 2 U packed cells/hr). 3. ACS occurs in 15% of patients and is characterized by high peak inspiratory pressure, CO2 retention, and oliguria. Lethal reperfusion syndrome is common but preventable.

Major hepatic trauma

The intraoperative management of complex liver injuries can be extremely challenging. During the past two decades, there have been some changes in philosophy regarding the optimal techniques for controlling hemorrhage and decreasing mortality and morbidity rates. An overview of these techniques is presented.

Liver trauma: a 10-year experience

The management of 73 patients with liver trauma (58 male, 15 female; mean age 30 (range 6-68) years) presenting from January 1980 to August 1990 is reviewed. There were 29 cases of penetrating injury and 44 of blunt trauma. Seven patients were successfully managed without operation (five with blunt injury) and were discharged after a mean hospital stay of 8 days. Fifty-one cases were classified as simple injuries (grade I or II) and were managed by suture (with or without drainage) or required no intervention, with three deaths. Fifteen cases were classified as complex injuries (grade III or IV) and underwent one or more of the following: perihepatic packing, resectional debridement, hemihepatectomy and hepatotomy with direct suture ligation. Six of these patients died from uncontrolled haemorrhage. The continued use of suture for simple injuries and of resectional debridement and/or packing for complex injuries is supported. Judicious clinical assessment and radiological monitoring may reduce the number of unnecessary laparotomies.

Continuing evolution in the approach to severe liver trauma

Surgical and radiologic techniques from computed tomography (CT) scanning and embolization to temporary gauze packing and mesh hepatorrhaphy have been developed to make the management of severe liver injuries more effective. Surgical approaches for severe liver trauma have been oriented to two major consequences of these injuries: hemorrhage and infection. Early attempts at hemorrhagic control found benefit only in temporary intrahepatic gauze packing. The subsequent recognition of complications after liver injury blamed the practice of packing, which then remained unused for more than 30 years. Yet more aggressive attempts at controlling hemorrhage without temporary packing failed to improve results. Temporary perihepatic gauze packing therefore has been reintroduced, but this is probably an imperfect solution. Mesh hepatorrhaphy may control bleeding without many of the adverse effects of packing. Fourteen patients are reported with severe liver injuries who have undergone mesh hepatorrhaphy, bringing the current reported experience with mesh hepatorrhaphy to 24, with a combined mortality rate of 37.5%. Thus far, it appears that only juxtacaval injuries fail to have their hemorrhage controlled with mesh hepatorrhaphy, but many believe that these injuries may be controlled by perihepatic packing. Prophylactic drainage of severe liver injuries is a concept for which there is little evidence of benefit. Furthermore, recent radiologic developments appear capable of draining those collections that do occasionally develop in the postoperative period. The ultimate challenge of liver transplantation for trauma has been attempted, but the experience is thus far very limited.

Abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage

Planned intra-abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage from liver and retroperitoneal injuries exacerbated by hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy regained popularity over the past decade. The authors reviewed 39 patients injured between August 1985 and September 1990; 31 packed for liver injuries, eight for nonliver injuries. The overall mortality rate was 44% (17/39); 9 (23%) exsanguinated, 3 (8%) died of head injuries, 3 (8%) of multisystem organ failure, 2 (5%) of late complications. The mean age was 33.9 +/- 16.2 (range, 16 to 79); there were 26 men and 13 women. Relaparotomy for pack removal was performed 2.0 +/- 1.1 days (range, 1 to 7) after initial operation. The authors identified intraoperative risk factors of pH less than or equal to 7.18, temperature less than or equal to 33 C, prothrombin time greater than or equal to 16, partial thromboplastin time greater than or equal to 50, and transfusion of 10 units or more of blood as highly predictive of outcome. Patients with four to five risk factors (n = 3) had a 100% mortality rate (p less than 0.04); two to three risk factors (n = 12), 83% mortality rate (p less than 0.003), compared with zero to one risk factors (n = 24), 18% mortality rate. Complications developed in six of 22 survivors (27%): 5 abdominal abscesses (23%), 2 wound dehiscences (9%), and 2 enterocutaneous fistulae (9%). Intra-abdominal packing will not stop all bleeding; 23% of the patients exsanguinated. In 77%, packing helped achieve hemostasis we believed was not otherwise possible. Packing may be done to prevent the development of acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy or may be done early in the treatment of cold, acidotic patients rather than massive transfusion in the face of surgically uncorrectable bleeding.

Significant trends in the treatment of hepatic trauma. Experience with 411 injuries

Several significant advances in the treatment of hepatic injuries have evolved over the past decade. These trends have been incorporated into the overall treatment strategy of hepatic injuries and are reflected in experiences with 411 consecutive patients. Two hundred fifty-eight patients (63%) with minor injuries (grades I to II) were treated by simple suture or hemostatic agents with a mortality rate of 6%. One hundred twenty-eight patients (31%) sustained complex hepatic injuries (grades III to V). One hundred seven patients (83.5%) with grades III or IV injury underwent portal triad occlusion and finger fracture of hepatic parenchyma alone. Seventy-three surviving patients (73%) required portal triad occlusion, with ischemia times varying from 10 to 75 minutes (mean, 30 minutes). The mortality rate in this group was 6.5% (seven patients) and was accompanied by a morbidity rate of 15%. Fourteen patients (11%) with grade V injury (retrohepatic cava or hepatic veins) were managed by prolonged protal triad occlusion (mean cross-clamp time, 46 minutes) and extensive finger fracture to the site of injury. In four of these patients an atrial caval shunt was additionally used. Two of these patients survived, whereas six of the 10 patients managed without a shunt survived, for an overall mortality rate of 43%. Over the past 4 years, six patients (4.7%) with ongoing coagulopathies were managed by packing and planned re-exploration, with four patients (67%) surviving and one (25%) developing an intra-abdominal abscess. One additional patient (0.8%) was managed by resectional debridement alone and survived. During the past 5 years, 25 hemodynamically stable and alert adult patients (6%) sustaining blunt trauma were evaluated by computed tomography scan and found to have grade I to III injuries. All were managed nonoperatively with uniform success. The combination of portal triad occlusion (up to 75 minutes), finger fracture technique, and the use of a viable omental pack is a safe, reliable, and effective method of managing complex hepatic injuries (grade III to IV). Juxtahepatic venous injuries continue to carry a prohibitive mortality rate, but nonshunting approaches seem to result in the lowest cumulative mortality rate. Packing and planned reexploration has a definitive life-saving role when used adjunctively in the presence of a coagulopathy. Nonoperative management of select hemodynamically stable adult patients, identified by serial computed tomography scans after sustaining blunt trauma is highly successful (95-97%).

Hepatic trauma and its management

This review examines the current management of trauma to the liver. The incidence, mechanism, classification, diagnosis, treatment and complications of hepatic trauma are discussed. Diagnosis of hepatic injury may be difficult and specific investigations are suggested. Non-operative treatment and the strict criteria necessary to identify suitable patients for this are assessed. The recent trend to conservative surgery in hepatic trauma is reviewed. Aggressive resuscitation and early control of bleeding are crucial and are emphasized.

Surgical restraint in the management of liver trauma

Previous experience in Cambridge in the management of liver trauma has led to the evolution of a protocol for surgical intervention to secure control of haemorrhage from the injured liver. We report 80 cases of liver trauma including 12 who were initially managed non-operatively; three of these subsequently required operation. Of the 80, all but five suffered blunt abdominal trauma. Perihepatic packing was used to manage 29 patients, of whom 21 were initially treated elsewhere before being transferred to Cambridge. Six of these required a hemihepatectomy at subsequent exploration. Of the 39 patients who underwent urgent laparotomy and definitive surgery, 11 (28 per cent) died; only three out of 29 (10 per cent) died after initial packing. Only one death from hepatic complications occurred after packing and subsequent transfer.

Factors affecting morbidity following hepatic trauma. A prospective analysis of 482 injuries

During a 5-year period, 482 patients with liver injuries were studied prospectively: 65% resulted from penetrating and 35% from blunt injuries. The injuries were graded by the hepatic injury scale (grades I to VI); transfusion requirements and perihepatic abscesses correlated with increasing scores. Minor surgical techniques were needed in 338 patients and 144 patients required major techniques. Omental packing was used in 60% of the major injuries and yielded 7% mortality and 8% abscess rates. Gauze packs were used for management of 10% of major injuries and yielded 29% mortality and 30% abscess rates. The patients were randomized to no drain, closed suction, or sump drainage and respective perihepatic abscess rates were 6.7%, 3.5%, and 13% (p less than 0.03; suction compared to closed suction). Multivariate analysis demonstrated increasing abdominal trauma indices and transfusion requirements as well as sump drainage to be associated independently with perihepatic infection.

The use of segmental anatomy for an operative classification of liver injuries

There is no universally accepted standard classification for liver injuries, and thus accurate comparison of reports on the subject is impossible. Most published reports on liver trauma suggest that both morbidity and mortality have a linear correlation with not only the amount of liver parenchyma injured but also with the magnitude of the surgical intervention. The exceptions are retrohepatic vein injuries, which have a mortality independent of associated parenchymal injury but should be integrated in any classification of liver injury. The classification proposed is based on the segmental anatomy of the liver (as defined by Couinaud): Grade I--Injuries requiring no operative intervention, or any injury that requires operative intervention limited to a segment or less. Grade II--Any injury that requires operative intervention involving two or more segments. Grade III--Any injury with an associated juxta- or retrohepatic vein injury. We reviewed all patients with isolated liver injuries during the past 5 years and prospectively reviewed all patients for the 6-month period from January to June 1988 and applied this classification. Sixty-nine patients had grade I injuries, with one death (1%); thirteen patients had grade II injuries, with six deaths (46%); and 13 patients had grade III injuries with nine deaths (69%). Postoperative morbidity was 7% for grade I, 57% for grade II, and 50% for grade III. This study supports the conclusion that morbidity and mortality from liver injury are directly related to the volume of parenchyma involved, and that segmental anatomy can be applied to define this volume. Mortality from retrohepatic vein injuries is independent of associated parenchymal injury. We believe that this proposed classification will provide a simple, reproducible, and accurate means for reporting and comparing liver injuries.

Hepatic trauma revisited

As stated in the introduction to this monograph, much has changed in the management of major hepatic injuries during the past 5 to 10 years. The major changes are summarized as follows: 1. Computed tomographic scanning is now the mainstay of diagnosis for hepatic injuries after blunt trauma and allows for nonoperative therapy in many patients with lacerations, intrahepatic hematomas, or subcapsular hematomas; 2. Realization that the time limit for application of the Pringle maneuver can be extended. 3. Recognition that fibrin glue appears to be a useful topical agent in preliminary clinical studies; 4. Use of hepatotomy with selective vascular ligation instead of mattress sutures for deep lacerations or to control hemorrhage from tracts of penetrating wounds; 5. Use of resectional débridement of devitalized tissue and selective vascular ligation instead of formal anatomical resection; 6. Use of an "omental pack" as a filler of deep cracks or hepatotomy sites instead of closure with mattress sutures; 7. Use of perihepatic packing in selected patients instead of resection when a coagulopathy or major subcapsular hematoma is present; 8. Discontinued use of perihepatic drains for minor or moderate hepatic injuries as long as discrete methods of selective vascular and biliary ligation have been used.

Perihepatic packing: its role in the management of liver trauma

Perihepatic packing was used in 25 of 197 (12.7%) patients presenting with liver trauma to Westmead Hospital over an 8 year period. Packing was used either to provide temporary haemostasis prior to transfer or as part of a definitive treatment plan at this hospital. Thirteen patients were packed prior to transfer. Only two were unstable on arrival, one of whom died. They were compared with 18 'comparison' patients with liver injuries of similar severity. In this group 10 were unstable on arrival (P = 0.027), nine of whom died (P = 0.015). Packing was used as part of a definitive treatment plan at Westmead on 17 occasions. Four patients were coagulopathic and five had also been packed prior to arrival. Eight of this group died. Packing is a convenient and safe way of controlling major hepatic haemorrhage prior to transfer to a tertiary referral centre. It may also be part of a definitive treatment plan to control hepatic bleeding especially as many patients arrive with a coagulopathy or develop a coagulopathy during the course of surgery to control bleeding. Packing will control haemorrhage until the coagulopathy has been corrected.