Empiric therapy of autoimmune hepatitis with mycophenolate mofetil: comparison with conventional treatment for refractory disease

Current status of therapy in autoimmune liver disease

Therapeutic strategies for autoimmune liver diseases are increasingly established. Although proportionately uncommon, specialist centers have with time refined the best approaches for each disease, based on an improved understanding of the spectrum of presentation. The major treatment aims are to prevent end-stage liver disease and its associated complications. As a result of drugs such as ursodeoxycholic acid, predniso(lo)ne and azathioprine, both primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune hepatitis are now less commonly indications for liver transplantation. Unfortunately, the same inroads in treatment efficacy have as yet not been made for primary sclerosing cholangitis, although the recognition that a subset of patients may have a treatable secondary sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4 related) is helping a proportion. With better biological understanding, more specific interventions are expected that will benefit all those with autoimmune liver diseases.

A single center review of the use of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) involves immune suppression by using prednisone alone or in combination with azathioprine (AZA). Although this regimen achieves remission in approximately 80%, some patients are intolerant or do not respond. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a potent immunosuppressant. However, its utility in AIH is not well-defined.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective longitudinal analysis of patients with AIH.

RESULTS

We identified 128 patients with AIH: mean age, 42.8 years; 83% female; 69% white. At presentation, median AST and ALT were 227 and 261 U/L, respectively, and bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis were present in 38% and 22%, respectively. Overall, 29 patients received MMF; 12 were switched to MMF after intolerance or nonresponse to prednisone +/- AZA, whereas 17 received MMF +/- prednisone as initial therapy. The main reasons for switching to MMF were nausea/vomiting (n = 4) and failure to normalize liver enzymes (n = 3). Ten of the 29 patients who received MMF therapy (34%) discontinued MMF as a result of side effects. Sixteen (84%) of the remaining 19 patients on MMF achieved remission, which closely matched the remission rate of those who remained on prednisone +/- AZA (82%). The only independent clinical factor that predicted the eventual need for the use of MMF was absence of cirrhosis (P = .0067).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) MMF was associated with a high rate of intolerance (34%). (2) In those who could tolerate it, it was associated with a high rate of remission (84%). (3) Absence of cirrhosis on presentation was the only independent factor associated with eventual need for MMF.

Safety issues in the management of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Prednisone and azathioprine are effective in the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis, but diverse side effects can diminish their net benefit.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the frequency and nature of these side effects and propose management strategies to minimize their impact.

METHODS

Pertinent articles published from 1970 to 2007 were identified by Medline search and through a personal library.

RESULTS

Medication is prematurely discontinued in 13% of patients mainly because of cosmetic changes, cytopenia, or osteopenia. Populations at high risk are the elderly, those with pre-existent co-morbidities, patients with near-zero thiopurine methyltransferase activity, individuals who are treatment-dependent, pregnant women, and asymptomatic patients who are over-treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper patient selection, effective pre-treatment counseling, preemptive protective measures, realistic treatment objectives, and early identification of problematic patients can reduce complications. Individualized dosing schedules and the emergence of non-steroidal medications are realistic expectations.

Features associated with treatment failure in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis and predictive value of the model of end-stage liver disease

Autoimmune hepatitis may fail to respond to corticosteroid therapy, but the frequency and bases for this outcome are uncertain. We aimed to determine the frequency and nature of treatment failure in patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, define features associated with its occurrence, and assess if the model for end-stage liver disease can predict this outcome. Patients failing conventional corticosteroid regimens were compared to patients who responded to similar regimens. Fourteen of 214 patients (7%) failed corticosteroid treatment. Patients who failed therapy were younger (33 +/- 3 years versus 48 +/- 1 years, P = 0.0008), had higher serum levels of bilirubin at accession (4.1 +/- 0.9 mg/dL versus 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/dL, P = 0.02), presented acutely more frequently (43% versus 14%, P = 0.01), and had a higher frequency of HLA (human leukocyte antigen) DRB1*03 (93% versus 53%, P = 0.004) than did patients who achieved remission. An alternative disease (fatty liver disease) emerged in only 1 patient who failed therapy (7%). Scores determined by the model of end-stage liver disease at presentation of patients who failed treatment were higher than those of who achieved remission (16 +/- 1 versus 10 +/- 0.3 points, P < 0.0001), and score greater than 12 points had greater sensitivity (97%) and specificity (68%) for treatment failure than did HLA DRB1*03 or other features.

CONCLUSION

Onset at an early age, acute presentation, hyperbilirubinemia, and presence of HLA DRB1*03 characterize patients who fail corticosteroid treatment. The model for end-stage liver disease may be a useful instrument for identifying patients prone to this outcome.

Mycophenolate mofetil in autoimmune hepatitis patients not responsive or intolerant to standard immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The immunosuppressive treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients is prednisone and azathioprine. Ten percent to 20% of patients do not respond or are intolerant of standard treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the biochemical, histologic, and hematologic parameters during mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment in AIH patients who did not respond to or were intolerant of prednisone and/or azathioprine.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 15 AIH patients who received MMF either as monotherapy or in combination with prednisone after failure or intolerance of the initial regimen. Records were reviewed as to initial therapy, reasons why MMF was initiated, liver enzyme levels, histology on MMF, and complications.

RESULTS

The mean age was 60 +/- 15 years. All patients were started on MMF at 1 gram twice a day, 3 on MMF monotherapy, and 12 on prednisone and MMF. The average MMF treatment duration was 41 months. Alanine aminotransferase levels decreased significantly from 91.73 +/- 88.69 to 60.87 +/- 71.2 (P = .03) on MMF treatment. Inflammatory scores (2.59 +/- 0.97 to 1.14 +/- 1.21, P = .02) and Ishak fibrosis scores (4.10 +/- 1.37 to 2.5 +/- 1.51, P = .02) also decreased. No significant hematologic complications were noted during MMF treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of MMF, either as monotherapy or in combination with prednisone, results in biochemical and histologic improvement in AIH patients who are prednisone and/or azathioprine intolerant or resistant without the development of significant complications. MMF should be studied prospectively as an alternative agent in the treatment of autoimmune liver disease.

Consequences of treatment withdrawal in type 1 autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Drug-related side effects are considered the major consequences of relapse and re-treatment in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Our goals were to determine whether relapse is associated with disease progression and whether treatment end points can be refined.

METHODS

The outcomes of 132 patients with definite type 1 autoimmune hepatitis who had been treated comparably until remission were assessed retrospectively after drug withdrawal.

RESULTS

Patients who had relapsed repeatedly after initial treatment withdrawal developed cirrhosis more commonly than patients who sustained remission (18/48 vs 1/22, P=0.004), and those who relapsed once (18/48 vs 2/21, P=0.02). Hepatic death or the need for liver transplantation was also more frequent in the patients who had multiple relapses than those who sustained remission (13/64 vs 0/30, P=0.008) and those who relapsed once (13/64 vs 1/38, P=0.02). Patients who sustained their remission had a higher frequency of normal laboratory indices at drug withdrawal than patients who relapsed (88% vs 46%, P=0.003). Adverse outcomes after relapse did not distinguish patients until after 5 years of observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple relapses are associated with a poorer prognosis than sustained remission or single relapse episodes. Initial treatment to resolution of laboratory abnormalities may afford the greatest opportunity to prevent relapse.

Current therapy for autoimmune hepatitis

The treatment of autoimmune hepatitis is evolving as the pathogenic pathways that underlie the disease are defined, new immunosuppressive agents are tested, and site-specific molecular interventions become feasible. Prednisone alone or at a reduced dose combined with azathioprine is the conventional treatment. Patients with HLA genotype DRB1*0301 have a poorer treatment response and a more frequent need for liver transplantation than those with HLA genotype DRB1*0401. Therapy to the point when liver test results and histological findings are normal reduces, but does not eliminate, the occurrence of relapse. Treatment failure warrants reassessment with regard to the accuracy of the original diagnosis and the exclusion of variant forms of hepatitis or concomitant alternative diseases. Ciclosporin might be effective as short-term, front-line therapy in infants and adults, and calcineurin inhibitors might salvage patients who are refractory to corticosteroid regimens. Mycophenolate mofetil can induce an improvement in laboratory test results and reduce the requirement for corticosteroids. Sirolimus is effective for treatment of de novo autoimmune hepatitis that develops after liver transplantation. Synthetic peptides that block autoantigen presentation, cytokine manipulations, oral tolerance regimens, T-cell vaccination, and gene therapy are all interventions that will be able to emerge after a reliable animal model of the human disease has been developed.

Autoimmune liver disease and rheumatic manifestations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review studies that clarify the rheumatic manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis, elucidate shared pathogenic pathways, and encourage innovative site-specific therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Autoimmune hepatitis has clinical manifestations, serological markers, pathogenic mechanisms, genetic predispositions, and therapies similar to the rheumatic diseases. The rheumatic manifestations may mask the underlying liver disease and vice versa. Variations in clinical phenotype and outcome for the autoimmune liver diseases may reflect host-specific and region-specific factors, and defects in counter-regulatory suppressor functions by regulatory T cells may facilitate cell-mediated cytotoxicity and autoreactivity. Mixed syndromes with hallmark features of one disease in another probably reflect a genetic predisposition for immune expression that is shared among the diseases. Mycophenolate mofetil, budesonide, rapamycin, and 6-thioguanine are promising treatments, and de-novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation suggests that the calcineurin inhibitors may have paradoxical effects on self-tolerance.

SUMMARY

Clinical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis commonly include rheumatic manifestations that can mask the liver disease. Defects in counter-regulatory functions enhance cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and pharmacological interventions that promise site-specific actions affecting immunocyte differentiation and proliferation are feasible.

Autoimmune hepatitis in children: diagnosis, pathology and treatment

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by progressive inflammation of the liver and destruction of liver parenchyma. Rare in absolute terms, it is nevertheless an important cause of noninfectious chronic liver disease in children. In many ways, the diagnosis and treatment of children with AIH has changed little over the last 10 years. However, in recent years, steady progress in defining the genetic, immunologic and potential environmental triggers that underlie this disease, in addition to increasing experience with a wider array of therapeutic agents, promises to expand our understanding and ability to treat AIH effectively. This review will summarize the current clinical and pathophysiological understanding of AIH in children, along with therapeutic options.

Autoimmune liver disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review studies that improve the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis and presage new drug and molecular site-specific interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Autoimmune hepatitis can present as acute or chronic hepatitis and as allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Elderly patients have an indolent but aggressive disease that responds well to corticosteroid therapy, and human leukocyte antigen DR4 characterizes this population. Geographic and ethnic factors influence clinical phenotype and behavior, and defects in T-regulatory cells may enhance cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Treatment response is the best index of prognosis, and normalization of serum aminotransferase abnormalities prevents disease progression. Mycophenolate mofetil, budesonide, rapamycin, and 6-thioguanine have been effective in small clinical experiences. De-novo autoimmune hepatitis can occur in adults and children after liver transplantation, and rapamycin may be an effective treatment.

SUMMARY

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution and diverse clinical manifestations. Phenotypes are affected by regional and ethnic factors which may provide clues to the etiologic agents. Defects in counter-regulatory functions enhance cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and interventions that promise site-specific actions affecting immunocyte differentiation and proliferation are now feasible. Autoimmune hepatitis must be considered in all patients with acute and chronic hepatitis and in all cases of allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation.