Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Postpartum Pain Evaluation and Management

Antiracist symptom science: A call to action and path forward

Nurse scientists recognize the experience of racism as a driving force behind health. However, symptom science, a pillar of nursing, has rarely considered contributions of racism. Our objective is to describe findings within symptom science research related to racial disparities and/or experiences of racism and to promote antiracist symptom science within nursing research. In this manuscript, we use an antiracist lens to review a predominant symptom science theory and literature in three areas of symptom science research-oncology, mental health, and perinatal health. Finally, we make recommendations for increasing antiracist research in symptom science by altering (a) research questions, (b) recruitment methods, (c) study design, (d) data analysis, and (e) dissemination of findings. Traditionally, symptom science focuses on individual level factors rather than broader contexts driving symptom experience and management. We urge symptom science researchers to embrace antiracism by designing research with the specific intent of dismantling racism at multiple levels.

Cross-Sectional Analyses of High-Impact Pain Across Pregnancy Status by Race and Ethnicity

Background: Preclinical and clinical research has suggested the existence of pregnancy-associated analgesia, wherein responses to painful stimulation or pain from disease decrease during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: We combined data from multiple years (2012-2015) of the National Health Interview Survey to examine high-impact pain by Hispanic ethnicity and race in women with no prior pregnancy, during pregnancy, and previously pregnant. Results: High-impact pain was less common for women during pregnancy (10.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.0%-13.7%) than it was for women who had never been pregnant (13.7%; 95% CI: 12.8%-14.5%) and for women who had previously been pregnant (19.8%; 95% CI: 16.0%-23.7%). However, when we examined the data by Hispanic ethnicity and race, we found that non-Hispanic White (NHW) women were less likely to report high-impact pain during pregnancy, but non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women and Hispanic White women were not. In women who reported no prior pregnancy, NHW women were most likely to report high-impact pain, followed by NHB women and Hispanic women. In post hoc analyses, we found that while menstrual problems were associated with increased odds of having high-impact pain, an interaction was not observed between menstrual problems and race/ethnicity (p = 0.48). Conclusions: This cross-sectional study presents a nationally representative examination of the prevalence of high-impact pain across pregnancy status. Using a nationally representative sample of women, we have demonstrated that the prevalence of high-impact pain varies across pregnancy status and that race/ethnicity and the presence of menstrual problems independently affect this prevalence.

Racial Disparities in Donor Human Milk Feedings: A Study Using Electronic Medical Records

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the use of pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) by maternal race-ethnicity during postpartum hospitalization using electronic medical records (EMRs).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of all live-born infants at our academic research institution from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, was conducted. EMR data were used to determine whether each infant received mother's own milk (MOM), PDHM, or formula. These data were stratified based on whether the infant received treatment in the Neonatal Critical Care Center. Generalized estimating equation models were used to calculate the odds of receiving PDHM by maternal race-ethnicity, adjusting for gestational age, birth weight, insurance, preferred language, nulliparity, and mode of delivery.

Results

Infant feeding data were available for 7097 infants, of whom 49% were fed only MOM during their postpartum hospitalization. Among the 15.9% of infants admitted to neonatal critical care, infants of non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.72), Hispanic (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.36-1019), and Other (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.26) mothers had lower rates of PDHM feedings than infants of non-Hispanic White mothers in the adjusted models. Among well infants, the use of PDHM was lower among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic mothers (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.18-0.36, and OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26-0.56) compared with non-Hispanic White mothers.

Conclusions

Inequities in exclusive human milk feeding and use of PDHM by maternal race-ethnicity were identified. Antiracist interventions are needed to promote equitable access to skilled lactation support and counseling for PDHM use.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol to Improve Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Postcesarean Pain Management

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and determine its effect on racial/ethnic disparities in postcesarean pain management.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study of scheduled cesarean deliveries before and after ERAS implementation at a single urban academic institution. Pre-ERAS, all analgesic medications were given postoperatively on patient request. The ERAS protocol included preoperative acetaminophen and celecoxib. Postoperatively, patients received scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. Oral oxycodone was available as needed, and opioid patient-controlled analgesia was eliminated from the standard order set. The primary outcome was total opioid use in the first 48 hours after cesarean, pre- and post-ERAS, reported in total milliequivalents of intravenous morphine (MME). A secondary analysis of opioid use and pain scores by racial groups was also performed. Chi-square, independent t-tests, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used depending on variable and data normality.

RESULTS

Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups included 100 women each. Post-ERAS, total opioid use in 48 hours was less (40.8 vs. 8.6 MME, p < 0.001) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were lower on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and 2 (POD2) (POD1 maximum at rest: 6.7 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001). Pre-ERAS pain scores differed by race with non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients reporting the highest mean and max VAS pain scores POD1 and POD2 (POD1, maximum VAS at rest: NHB-7.4, non-Hispanic White-6.6, Hispanic-5.8, Asian-4.4, p = 0.006). Post-ERAS, there were no differences in postoperative pain scores between groups with movement on POD1 and POD2.

CONCLUSION

A standardized ERAS protocol for postcesarean pain decreases opioid use and may improve some racial disparities in postcesarean pain control.

KEY POINTS

· ERAS protocols improve postoperative pain control and lower postoperative opioid use.. · Studies show that there are racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum pain control.. · Protocols standardize care and may decrease the effects of provider implicit bias..

Impact of timing of multimodal analgesia in enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocols on postoperative opioids: A single center before-and-after study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) programs aim to decrease maternal morbidity and aid in maternal recovery and return to baseline. Multimodal analgesia is an important element of ERAC protocols, but no consensus exists on the timing of medication administration. We compared maternal pain outcomes following scheduled cesarean delivery with modification of the timing of administration of multimodal analgesia with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen.

DESIGN

Before-and-after study.

SETTING

Labor and delivery unit at a single academic institution.

INTERVENTION

NSAIDs and acetaminophen were administered as a fixed-interval alternating regimen every 3 h for the initial ERAC group (ERAC 1) and fixed-interval combined regimen every 6 h for the modified ERAC group (ERAC 2). ERAC 1 and ERAC 2 groups were compared to historical controls (Pre-ERAC).

PATIENTS

520 women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery (Pre-ERAC n = 179, ERAC 1 n = 179, and ERAC 2 n = 162).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes were postoperative total and daily opioid utilization as measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included postoperative length of stay, maximum pain scores, and racial disparities in care.

MAIN RESULTS

The modified schedule of non-opioid analgesics involving combined administration (ERAC 2) versus alternating administration (ERAC 1) of multimodal analgesia resulted in decreased total postoperative opioid utilization (median = 26.3 vs 52.5 MME, Bonferroni corrected P = 0.002). Total postoperative opioid utilization among the ERAC 2 group was also significantly reduced compared to the Pre-ERAC group (median = 26.3 vs 105.0 MME, Bonferroni corrected P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary teams developing or modifying ERAC protocols for scheduled cesarean delivery should consider a combined administration at fixed intervals of NSAIDs and acetaminophen throughout the hospital stay to optimize postoperative pain management.

Development and Validation of a Model for Opioid Prescribing Following Gynecological Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Overprescription of opioid medications following surgery is well documented. Current prescribing models have been proposed in narrow patient populations, which limits their generalizability.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model for predicting outpatient opioid use following a range of gynecological surgical procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this prognostic study, statistical models were explored using data from a training cohort of participants undergoing gynecological surgery for benign and malignant indications enrolled prospectively at a single institution's academic gynecologic oncology practice from February 2018 to March 2019 (cohort 1) and considering 39 candidate predictors of opioid use. Final models were internally validated using a separate testing cohort enrolled from May 2019 to February 2020 (cohort 2). The best final model was updated by combining cohorts, and an online calculator was created. Data analysis was performed from March to May 2020.

EXPOSURES

Participants completed a preoperative survey and weekly postoperative assessments (up to 6 weeks) following gynecological surgery. Pain management was at the discretion of clinical practitioners.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The response variable used in model development was number of pills used postoperatively, and the primary outcome was model performance using ordinal concordance and Brier score.

RESULTS

Data from 382 female adult participants (mean age, 56 years; range, 18-87 years) undergoing gynecological surgery (minimally invasive procedures, 158 patients [73%] in cohort 1 and 118 patients [71%] in cohort 2; open surgical procedures, 58 patients [27%] in cohort 1 and 48 patients [29%] in cohort 2) were included in model development. One hundred forty-seven patients (38%) used 0 pills after hospital discharge, and the mean (SD) number of pills used was 7 (10) (median [IQR], 3 [0-10] pills). The model used 7 predictors: age, educational attainment, smoking history, anticipated pain medication use, anxiety regarding surgery, operative time, and preoperative pregabalin administration. The ordinal concordance was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68) for predicting 5 or more pills (Brier score, 0.22), 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68) for predicting 10 or more pills (Brier score, 0.18), and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68) for predicting 15 or more pills (Brier score, 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This model provides individualized estimates of outpatient opioid use following a range of gynecological surgical procedures for benign and malignant indications with all model inputs available at the time of procedure closing. Implementation of this model into the clinical setting is currently ongoing, with plans for additional validation in other surgical populations.

How Can We Get to Equitable and Effective Postpartum Pain Control?

Postpartum pain is common, yet patient experiences and clinical management varies greatly. In the United States, pain-related expectations and principles of adequate pain management have been framed within established norms of Western clinical medicine and a biomedical understanding of disease processes. Unfortunately, this positioning of postpartum pain and the corresponding coping strategies and pain treatments is situated within cultural biases and systemic racism. This paper summarizes the history and existing literature that examines racial inequities in pain management to propose guiding themes and suggestions for innovation. This work is critical for advancing ethical practice and establishing more effective care for all patients.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #62: Best practices in equitable care delivery-Addressing systemic racism and other social determinants of health as causes of obstetrical disparities

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention define social determinants of health as "the conditions in the places where people live, learn, work, and play" that can affect health outcomes. Systemic racism is a root cause of the power and wealth imbalances that affect social determinants of health, creating disproportionate rates of comorbidities and adverse outcomes in the communities of racial and ethnic minority groups. Focusing primarily on disparities between Black and White individuals born in the United States, this document reviews the effects of social determinants of health and systemic racism on reproductive health outcomes and recommends multilevel approaches to mitigate disparities in obstetrical outcomes.

Addressing bias and disparities in periviable counseling and care

Addressing bias and disparities in counseling and care requires that we contend with dehumanizing attitudes, stereotypes, and beliefs that our society and profession holds towards people of color, broadly, and Black birthing people in particular. It also necessitates an accounting of the historically informed, racist ideologies that shape present-day implicit biases. These biases operate in a distinctly complex and damaging manner in the context of end-of-life care, which centers around questions related to human pain, suffering, and value. Therefore, this paper aims to trace biases and disparities that operate in periviable care, where end-of-life decisions are made at the very beginning of life. We start from a historical context to situate racist ideologies into present day stereotypes and tropes that dehumanize and disadvantage Black birthing people and Black neonates in perinatal care. Here, we review the literature, address historical incidents and consider their impact on our ability to deliver patient-centered periviable care.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Management of Postdural Puncture Headache With Epidural Blood Patch for Obstetric Patients in New York State

IMPORTANCE

Characterizing and addressing racial and ethnic disparities in peripartum pain assessment and treatment is a national priority.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of race and ethnicity with the provision and timing of an epidural blood patch (EBP) for management of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study used New York State hospital discharge records from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2016, from mothers 15 to 49 years of age with a postdural puncture headache after neuraxial analgesia or anesthesia for childbirth. Statistical analysis was performed from February 2020 to February 2022.

EXPOSURES

Patients' race and ethnicity (reported as provided by each participating hospital; the method of determining race and ethnicity [ie, self-reported or not] cannot be determined from the data) were categorized into non-Hispanic White (reference group), non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other race and ethnicity (including Asian and Pacific Islander, American Indian, Alaskan Native, and other).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of EBP use. The secondary outcome was the interval (days) between hospital admission and provision of EBP. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of EBP use associated with race and ethnicity were estimated using mixed-effect logistic regression models, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8921 patients (mean [SD] age, 30 [6] years; 1028 [11.5%] Black; 1301 [14.6%] Hispanic; 4960 [55.6%] White; and 1359 [15.2%] other race and ethnicity) with postdural puncture headache were identified among 1.9 million deliveries with a neuraxial procedure. Of these 8921 patients, 4196 (47.0%; 95% CI, 46.0%-48.1%) were managed with an EBP. A total of 2650 White patients (53.4%; 95% CI, 52.0%-54.8%) used an EBP; this rate was significantly higher than that among Hispanic patients (41.7% [543]; 95% CI, 39.9%-44.5%), Black patients (35.7% [367]; 95% CI, 32.8%-38.7%), or patients of other race and ethnicity (35.2% [478]; 95% CI, 32.6%-37.8%). Timing of EBP was at a median of 2 days (IQR, 2-3 days) after hospital admission for White patients compared with a median of 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days) for Hispanic patients, Black patients, and patients of other race and ethnicity (P < .001 for the comparison with White patients). After adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics, the EBP rate was not different between White and Hispanic patients (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.30). It was significantly lower for Black patients (adjusted OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.94) and patients of other races and ethnicities (adjusted OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, significant racial and ethnic disparities in the management of postdural puncture headache with EBP were observed, with both lower rates and delayed timing, which may be associated with long-term adverse effects.

Textbook typologies: Challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis

Medical education's treatment of obstetric-related anatomy exemplifies historical sex bias in medical curricula. Foundational obstetric and midwifery textbooks teach that clinical pelvimetry and the Caldwell-Moloy classification system are used to assess the pelvic capacity of a pregnant patient. We describe the history of these techniques-ostensibly developed to manage arrested labors-and offer the following criticisms. The sample on which these techniques were developed betrays the bias of the authors and does not represent the sample needed to address their interest in obstetric outcomes. Caldwell and Moloy wrote as though the size and shape of the bony pelvis are the primary causes of "difficult birth"; today we know differently, yet books still present their work as relevant. The human obstetric pelvis varies in complex ways that are healthy and normal such that neither individual clinical pelvimetric dimensions nor the artificial typologies developed from these measurements can be clearly correlated with obstetric outcomes. We critique the continued inclusion of clinical pelvimetry and the Caldwell-Moloy classification system in biomedical curricula for the racism that was inherent in the development of these techniques and that has clinical consequences today. We call for textbooks, curricula, and clinical practices to abandon these outdated, racist techniques. In their place, we call for a truly evidence-based practice of obstetrics and midwifery, one based on an understanding of the complexity and variability of the physiology of pregnancy and birth. Instead of using false typologies that lack evidence, this change would empower both pregnant people and practitioners.

Nurses' Perspectives on Postpartum Pain Management

Introduction:

There is variation in postpartum opioid use by prescriber characteristics that cannot be explained by patient or birth factors. Thus, our objective was to evaluate nursing training, clinical practices, and perspectives on opioid use for postpartum pain management.

Materials and Methods:

In this survey study, postpartum bedside nurses at a single, large academic center were asked about training, factors influencing clinical decisions, and viewpoints regarding pain management and opioid use. Findings were summarized using descriptive analyses.

Results:

A total of 92 nurses completed the survey. A majority (77%) reported having received some formal training on opioid use for pain management. About a quarter (25.7%) felt their training was not adequate. Regarding clinical practices, the majority (71% and 70%, respectively) reported that “routine habit” and “patient preference” most influenced the type and amount of pain medication they administered. Finally, nurses' perspectives on pain management demonstrated a wide range of beliefs. Most nurses strongly agreed with the importance of maximizing nonopioid pain medication before opioid administration. The majority agreed that patient-reported pain score is important to consider when deciding to administer opioids. Conversely, most nurses disagreed that patients should be encouraged to endure as much pain as possible before using an opioid. Similarly, beliefs about the reliability of use of vital signs in assessing pain intensity varied widely.

Conclusions:

Bedside nurses rely on routine habits, patient preference, and patient-reported pain score when administering opioids for postpartum pain management. Increased training opportunities to improve consistency and standardization of opioid administration may be beneficial.

Trajectories of Dyspareunia From Pregnancy to 24 Months Postpartum

Two distinct trajectories of dyspareunia were identified from pregnancy to 24 months postpartum; pain catastrophizing predicted inclusion in the moderate relative to minimal pain trajectory.

To identify distinct trajectories of dyspareunia in primiparous women and examine biopsychosocial risk factors of these trajectories.

Association Between Patient-Prescriber Racial and Ethnic Concordance and Postpartum Pain and Opioid Prescribing

Objective:

To evaluate whether patient-prescriber racial and ethnic concordance is associated with postpartum opioid prescribing patterns and patient-reported pain scores.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered at a tertiary care center between December 1, 2015 and November 30, 2016. Self-identified non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, or Asian patients were included. Patient-prescriber pairs were categorized as racially and ethnically concordant if they shared the same racial and ethnic identity; the prescriber was defined as the obstetrical provider who was responsible for the postpartum discharge of the patient. Multivariable regression models controlling for demographic and clinical confounders were used to assess the relationship of patient-prescriber racial and ethnic concordance with receipt of an opioid prescription and patient-reported pain score at discharge.

Results

Of 10,242 patients included in this analysis, 62.3% identified as NHW, 19.1% Hispanic, 9.7% NHB, and 8.9% Asian. About half (52.8%) of patients were discharged by a racially and ethnically concordant prescriber. Patient-prescriber racial and ethnic concordance was not associated with receipt of an opioid prescription (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.82, confidence interval [95% CI] 0.67–1.00) or reporting a pain score ≥5 (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69–1.16). However, NHB and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive an opioid prescription (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–0.95; aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57–0.92, respectively) and significantly more likely to report a pain score ≥5 (aOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.51–3.00; aOR 1.48 95% CI 1.08–2.01, respectively) than NHW patients, even when accounting for concordance.

Conclusion

Disparities in postpartum opioid prescribing and pain perception are not ameliorated by patient-prescriber racial and ethnic concordance.

Perinatal morbidity and health utilization among mothers of medically fragile infants

OBJECTIVE

To determine the burden of perinatal morbidity among mothers of medically fragile infants.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 6849 mothers who delivered liveborn infants at a quaternary care hospital during a two-year period. We compared mothers of well babies with mothers of infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), and we used logistic regression to model predictors of postpartum acute care utilization among NICU mothers.

RESULTS

Rates of obstetric morbidity were highest for mothers of infants staying ≥72 h in the NICU; 54.2% underwent cesarean birth, 7.5% experienced severe maternal morbidity, and 6.6% required a blood transfusion. Factors independently associated with postpartum acute care use included gestational age <28 weeks, ever smoking, non-Hispanic Black race, temperature >38 °C and receiving psychiatric medication during the birth hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Focused support for mothers of NICU infants has the potential to reduce maternal morbidity and improve health.

Does race or ethnicity play a role in the origin, pathophysiology, and outcomes of preeclampsia? An expert review of the literature

The burden of preeclampsia, a substantial contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality, is not born equally across the population. Although the prevalence of preeclampsia has been reported to be 3% to 5%, racial and ethnic minority groups such as non-Hispanic Black women and American Indian or Alaskan Native women are widely reported to be disproportionately affected by preeclampsia. However, studies that add clarity to the causes of the racial and ethnic differences in preeclampsia are limited. Race is a social construct, is often self-assigned, is variable across settings, and fails to account for subgroups. Studies of the genetic structure of human populations continue to find more variations within racial groups than among them. Efforts to examine the role of race and ethnicity in biomedical research should consider these limitations and not use it as a biological construct. Furthermore, the use of race in decision making in clinical settings may worsen the disparity in health outcomes. Most of the existing data on disparities examine the differences between White and non-Hispanic Black women. Fewer studies have enough sample size to evaluate the outcomes in the Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, or mixed-race women. Racial differences are noted in the occurrence, presentation, and short-term and long-term outcomes of preeclampsia. Well-established clinical risk factors for preeclampsia such as obesity, diabetes, and chronic hypertension disproportionately affect non-Hispanic Black, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Hispanic populations. However, with comparable clinical risk factors for preeclampsia among women of different race or ethnic groups, addressing modifiable risk factors has not been found to have the same protective effect for all women. Abnormalities of placental formation and development, immunologic factors, vascular changes, and inflammation have all been identified as contributing to the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Few studies have examined race and the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Despite attempts, a genetic basis for the disease has not been identified. A number of genetic variants, including apolipoprotein L1, have been identified as possible risk modifiers. Few studies have examined race and prevention of preeclampsia. Although low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preeclampsia is recommended by the US Preventive Service Task Force, a population-based study found racial and ethnic differences in preeclampsia recurrence after the implementation of low-dose aspirin supplementation. After implementation, recurrent preeclampsia reduced among Hispanic women (76.4% vs 49.6%; P<.001), but there was no difference in the recurrent preeclampsia in non-Hispanic Black women (13.7 vs 18.1; P=.252). Future research incorporating the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities multilevel framework, specifically examining the role of racism on the burden of the disease, may help in the quest for effective strategies to reduce the disproportionate burden of preeclampsia on a minority population. In this model, a multilevel framework provides a more comprehensive approach and takes into account the influence of behavioral factors, environmental factors, and healthcare systems, not just on the individual.

Association of Inpatient Postpartum Opioid Use with Bedside Nurse

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to assess the association between the nurse providing bedside care and women's postpartum opioid use.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all women who birthed at a single center (December 2015 to November 2016). Patient, prescriber, and clinical data were abstracted. The postpartum nurse and total opioid use during the first 12-hour postpartum shift after birth were determined. A high amount of opioid use was defined as morphine milligram equivalents greater than or equal to 90% for this population (stratified by vaginal and cesarean births). A logistic regression model was fit with covariates entered in a step-wise manner to identify the extent to which individual nurses were associated with a greater likelihood of high opioid use by establishing one model in which the only covariate was nurse (model 1) and assessing whether the addition of patient (model 2), birth (model 3), and prescriber factors (model 4) altered the association. Kendall rank correlation assessed rank changes between models.

RESULTS

Of the 8376 and 2957 women who had vaginal and cesarean births, 17.9% and 10.2%, respectively, had high opioid use. In the vaginal cohort, women cared for by 46 of 200 nurses were significantly less likely to have high opioid use. Following adjustment, patients cared for by 53 of 200 bedside nurses (model 4) had significantly lower odds of having high opioid use. The rank order of nurses, with respect to the likelihood of opioid use, remained similar after adjustment for patient, birth, and prescriber factors (Τ = 0.84). Findings were similar for the cesarean cohort: 35 of 113 nurses were associated with a significantly lower likelihood of their patients having high opioid use, and the rank order remained similar after covariate adjustment (Τ = 0.78).

DISCUSSION

There is significant variation in postpartum women's opioid use based on the nurse that is not explained by patient, birth, or prescriber factors.

Disparities in Mental Health and Well-Being Among Black and Latinx Patients With Kidney Disease

Black and Latinx individuals in the United States are afflicted disproportionately with kidney disease. Because of structural racism, social risk factors drive disparities in disease prevalence and result in worse outcomes among these patient groups. The impact of social and economic oppression is pervasive in physical and emotional aspects of health. In this review, we describe the history of race and ethnicity among black and Latinx individuals in the United States and discuss how these politicosocial constructs impact disparities in well-being and mental health. Lastly, we outline future research, clinical considerations, and policy considerations to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in well-being among black and Latinx individuals with kidney disease.

Integrative Review of Racial Disparities in Perinatal Outcomes Among Beneficiaries of the Military Health System

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent to which racial disparities exist in the perinatal outcomes of beneficiaries of the Military Health System (MHS).

DATA SOURCES

We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals in which the authors examined race in relation to perinatal outcomes among beneficiaries of the MHS. Date of publication was unrestricted through March 2021.

DATA EXTRACTION

Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. We extracted data about study design, purpose, sample, setting, and results. We also assigned quality appraisal ratings to each article.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In most of the included articles, researchers observed differences in perinatal outcomes between Black and White women. Compared to White women, Black women had greater rates of cesarean birth, preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age neonates. White women had greater rates of postpartum depression than Black women.

CONCLUSION

Racial disparities in very low birth weight newborns and preterm birth may be smaller in the MHS than in the general population of the United States. The overall rates of preterm birth, cesarean birth, and neonatal mortality were lower for beneficiaries of the MHS than in the general population of the United States.

Does size matter? Opioid use after laparoscopy for apical pelvic organ prolapse using an 8mm versus 10-12mm accessory port

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if a change in lateral accessory port (LAP) size from 10-12mm to 8mm among women undergoing laparoscopic native tissue pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was effective at reducing opioid use after surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort of women taking part in a POP surgical registry.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital in Calgary, Canada.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing laparoscopic uterosacral ligament apical suspensions for stage ≥2 POP with either uterine preservation or concomitant hysterectomy. 92 women were included during a 15-month study period from June 2020 to September 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic apical suspension using either a 10-12mm or 8mm LAP, with the change occurring at the mid-point of the study period. Fascial defects from 10-12mm ports were closed with a fascial closure device. Perioperative care and technique were otherwise unchanged.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Post-operative opioid use was measured by mean morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), accounting for all oral and intravenous opioids used in the first 24-hours post-surgery. 50 cases (54.3%) used a 10-12mm LAP, 42 cases (45.7%) used an 8mm LAP. Mean MEDD after surgery with a 10-12mm LAP was significantly higher than with an 8mm LAP (35.3 (95% CI 24.9-45.6) vs. 13.6 (95% CI 8.0-19.2), p<0.001). Proportion of women who did not require opioids post-operatively was higher in the 8mm group (45.2%, n=19) than the 10-12mm group (18.0%, n=9) (cOR 3.76, 95% CI 1.47-9.66). Similarly, the proportion of women who did not fill an opioid prescription after discharge was higher in the 8mm group (35.7%, n=15) than the 10-12mm group (16.0%, n=8) (cOR 2.92, 95% CI 1.09-7.81). These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, length of procedure, and concomitant procedures performed.

CONCLUSION

Compared to 10-12mm port, use of an 8mm LAP during laparoscopic native-tissue apical POP surgery is associated with decreased opioid use in the first 24 hours after surgery.

Association between opioid overdose death rates and educational attainment - United States, 2010-2019

Educational attainment may be an indicator of disparities in the ongoing opioid-overdose crisis. To understand the association between educational attainment and fatal opioid overdose, death records in the mortality files published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed. Proportionate mortality due to opioid overdose, PMOD, was used, as age-adjusted death rates suffer dual data-source errors caused by differences in educational data reported in death records and in population surveys. From 2013 to 2019, PMOD increased by 120% for the "less-than-high-school-diploma" (<HS) education group, whereas the increase was 60% and 30% for groups with bachelor's and graduate-level educations, respectively. Educational gradient was observed for both males and females, with PMOD for males higher than females. From 2013 to 2019, males and females with <HS education experienced 142% and 85% increases in PMOD, respectively, compared with the 94% and 26% increases for males and females, respectively, with BS education. The PMOD increase was primarily driven by synthetic opioids (ICD-10 code T40.4). From 2013 to 2019, for males with <HS education, PMOD related to T40.4 opioids increased by 19-fold, whereas the increase was more than 100-fold for adult Black males with <HS education. These results suggest that the impact of lower educational attainment may be getting worse and furthering inequities in health. Responses to the opioid-overdose epidemic should consider the large educational gradient. Extra attention to the most vulnerable groups is necessary.

The Association between Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathway with Standardized Discharge Prescriptions and Opioid Use and Pain Experience after Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to evaluate opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD) and to assess implementation of an enhanced recovery after CD (ERAS-CD) pathway and its association with inpatient and postdischarge pain control and opioid use.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a baseline survey of women who underwent CD from January to March 2017 at a single, urban academic hospital. Patients were called 5 to 8 days after discharge and asked about their pain and postdischarge opioid use. An ERAS-CD pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative, including use of nonopioid analgesia and standardization of opioid discharge prescriptions to ≤25 tablets of oxycodone of 5 mg. From November to January 2019, a postimplementation survey was conducted to assess the association between this initiative and patients' pain control and postoperative opioid use, both inpatient and postdischarge.

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 152 women preimplementation (PRE) and 137 women post-implementation (POST); complete survey data were obtained from 102 women PRE and 98 women POST. The median inpatient morphine milligram equivalents consumed per patient decreased significantly from 141 [range: 90-195] PRE to 114 [range: 45-168] POST (p = 0.002). On a 0- to 10-point scale, median patient-reported pain scores at discharge decreased significantly (PRE: 7 [range: 5-8] vs. POST 5 [range: 3-7], p < 0.001). The median number of pills consumed after discharge also decreased significantly (PRE: 25 [range: 16-30] vs. POST 17.5 [range: 4-25], p = 0.001). The number of pills consumed was significantly associated with number prescribed (p < 0.001). The median number of leftover pills and number of refills did not significantly differ between groups. Median patient-reported pain scores at the week after discharge were lower in the POST group (PRE: 4 [range: 2-6] vs. POST 3[range: 1-5], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Implementing an ERAS-CD pathway was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient and postdischarge opioid consumption while improving pain control. Our data suggest that even fewer pills could be prescribed for some patients.

KEY POINTS

· An ERAS-CD pathway was associated with decreased opioid use.. · Outpatient opioid consumption after cesarean warrants further study.. · Physician prescribing drives patients' opioid consumption..

Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Healthcare-associated Infections Under the Shadow of Structural Racism: Narrative Review and Call to Action

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this study is to review racial and ethnic inequities in the incidence and prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the USA, identify gaps in the literature, and recommend future directions to mitigate these inequities.

Recent Findings

While some existing literature has identified the presence of racial/ethnic inequities in HAI incidence and outcomes, few studies to date have evaluated whether HAI prevention efforts have mitigated these inequities. Factors contributing to inequities in HAI prevention may include unconscious bias of healthcare professionals towards minoritized patients; socioeconomic and structural inequities disparately affecting minoritized communities; the racial segregation of quality healthcare through hospital price discrimination; divergent reimbursement rates between public and private insurers; policies or performance metrics which underfund and financially penalize safety-net hospitals; and insufficient research evaluating and addressing HAI inequities.

Summary

Expansion of the literature is needed to further interrogate root causes and evaluate the impact of interventions on racial/ethnic inequities in HAI incidence. Measures to mitigate inequities might include teaching healthcare workers how to recognize and mitigate unconscious biases, expanding community resources which address the social and structural determinants of health, increasing access to preventive health services, reforming federal and institutional policies to better support safety-net hospitals and disincentivize price discrimination, and improving diversity and inclusion within the health workforce.

Pharmacologic Stepwise Multimodal Approach for Postpartum Pain Management: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 1

SUMMARY

Pain in the postpartum period is common and considered by many individuals to be both problematic and persistent (1). Pain can interfere with individuals' ability to care for themselves and their infants, and untreated pain is associated with risk of greater opioid use, postpartum depression, and development of persistent pain (2). Clinicians should therefore be skilled in individualized management of postpartum pain. Though no formal time-based definition of postpartum pain exists, the recommendations presented here provide a framework for management of acute perineal, uterine, and incisional pain. This Clinical Consensus document was developed using an a priori protocol in conjunction with the authors listed. This document has been revised to incorporate more recent evidence regarding postpartum pain.

Opioid prescription-use after cesarean delivery: an observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current opioid prescription practices following a cesarean delivery.

METHODS

Women were asked to participate in a prospective observational cohort study following a cesarean delivery. Participants were asked about their opioid use after discharge, amount leftover, subjective pain score, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 344 women had cesarean deliveries during the study period, 242 were approached, 171 met eligibility criteria, and 109 were included in the analysis. Women in our study were predominantly African American (66.1%), high school graduates (32.1%), publicly insured (65.1%), single (55%) working mothers (68.8%). Most had been previously prescribed opioids (70.6%), of which 58.4% had a prior cesarean delivery. Only 78.8% of study participants took their opioid prescriptions, and 89.6% had an average of 17 pills leftover. The number of pills taken correlated with those prescribed in the study. Improved satisfaction in pain control with opioid and non-opioid alternatives was associated with a decrease in opioids used. Similarly, the participants' perception of their abundant prescription quantity was associated with a decrease in prescription taken.

CONCLUSION

Women were prescribed excess opioids. Excess opioids accounted for 63.3% of all pills filled, a total of 1670 pills leftover, most of which were stored in an unlocked location (75.6%). Our data showed a discrepancy of pills prescribed (24) compared to those used (10), which was also perceived as enough or too many by our participants. Our study demonstrates that women would benefit from fewer opioid pills and a discussion based on their pain perception.

Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Pregnancy-Related Morbidity and Mortality

Racism in America has deep roots that impact maternal health, particularly through pervasive inequities among Black women as compared with White, although other racial and ethnic groups also suffer. Health care providers caring for pregnant women are optimally positioned to maintain vigilance for these disparities in maternal care, and to intervene with their diverse skillsets and knowledge. By increasing awareness of how structural racism drives inequities in health, these providers can encourage hospitals and practices to develop and implement national bundles for patient safety, and use bias training and team-based training practices aimed at improving care for racially diverse mothers.

The impact of race on postpartum opioid prescribing practices: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To identify the association between inpatient postpartum opioid consumption, race, and amount of opioids prescribed at discharge after vaginal or cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A total of 416 women who were prescribed an oral opioid following vaginal or cesarean delivery at a single tertiary academic institution between July 2018 and October 2018 were identified. Women with postoperative wound complications, third and fourth degree lacerations, cesarean hysterectomy, or a history of opioid abuse were excluded. The primary outcome was the number of oxycodone 5 mg tablets prescribed at discharge, stratified by race and mode of delivery. Only "Black" and "White" women were included in analyses due to low absolute numbers of other identities. Black women were compared to white women using multivariable logistic regression. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The median number of oxycodone tablets consumed during hospitalization following cesarean delivery was seven (IQR: 2.5-12 tablets) and following vaginal delivery was one (IQR: 0-3). White women were more likely to be older at delivery regardless of route (median 32 vs. 30 years for cesarean delivery, and 29 vs. 27 years for vaginal delivery; p < 0.01 for both). White women undergoing cesarean delivery did so at a lower maternal BMI (31.6 vs. 34.5; p = 0.02). White women were also significantly more likely to have private insurance and to experience perineal lacerations following vaginal delivery. The number of inpatient opioid tablets consumed, as well as the number prescribed at discharge, were not statistically different between Black and White women, regardless of mode of delivery. These findings persisted in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

At our large, academic hospital the number of tablets prescribed at discharge had no association with patient race or inpatient usage regardless of mode of delivery.

Opioid use patterns in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy: Single-institution retrospective analysis characterizing patients who did not require opioid therapy

BACKGROUND

We had previously analyzed the variables that determine the rates of opioid use at 1-year postradiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Here we analyze the variables associated with opioid abstinence during and in the 12 months after radiotherapy at our institution.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of patients with head and neck cancer who received radiotherapy as part of curative treatment at our institution. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine socioeconomic and clinical factors associated with opioid abstinence.

RESULTS

The cohort included 376 patients. On multivariable analysis, patients from an upper-income class (p = 0.004), black race (p = 0.004), older (p = 0.008), with dependent children (p < 0.001) or receiving surgery (p = 0.002) were more likely to abstain from opioids, while patients using analgesic mouthwash (p = 0.009) or higher pain scale (p = 0.002) were less likely.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic and treatment characteristics are associated with opioid abstinence during and following radiation treatment in patients with head and neck cancer.

Closing the gap in representation of racial and ethnic minorities in pain medicine: A 2018-2019 status report

Racial health disparities persist despite increased public awareness of systemic racism. Due to the inherent subjectivity of pain perception, assessment and management, physician-patient bias in pain medicine remains widespread. It is broadly accepted that increasing racial diversity in the field of medicine is a critical step towards addressing persistent inequities in patient care. To assess the current racial demographics of the pain medicine pipeline, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medical school matriculants and graduates, residents, and pain fellows in 2018. Our results show that the 2018 anesthesiology residency ERAS applicant pool consisted of 46.2% non-Hispanic White, 7.0% non-Hispanic Black and 5.8% Hispanic students. The population of 2018 anesthesiology residents included 63% non-Hispanic White, 6.8% non-Hispanic Black and 5.4% Hispanic persons. Of the total eligible resident pool for pain fellowships (n = 30,415) drawn from core specialties, 44% were non-Hispanic White, 4.9% non-Hispanic Black and 5.1% Hispanic. Similar proportions were observed for pain medicine and regional anesthesia fellows. We briefly discuss the implications of the shortage of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic representation in pain medicine as it relates to the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest approaches to improving these disparities.

Racial inequity in methadone dose at delivery in pregnant women with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Medications for opioid use disorder, including methadone, combined with comprehensive wraparound services, are the gold standard for treatment in pregnancy. Higher methadone doses are associated with treatment retention in pregnancy and relapse prevention. Given known inequities where individuals of color tend to be prescribed lower doses of opioids for other conditions, the purpose of this study was to determine whether there is racial inequity in methadone dose at delivery in pregnant women with opioid use disorder.

METHODS

Retrospective review of medical charts identified pregnant women (N = 339) treated with methadone for opioid use disorder during pregnancy at one center from 2012 to 2017. Variables extracted from medical records included race, demographic and relevant clinical information (e.g., methadone dose at delivery, height, weight, etc.). Analyses used simple and multiple linear regressions to determine associations between these characteristics and methadone dose at delivery.

RESULTS

The mean methadone doses at delivery among women of color and white women were 105.8 mg and 144.9 mg, respectively (p < .0001). After adjusting for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, body mass index, type of opioid used, and parity, race was significantly and independently associated with methadone dose at delivery, with women of color receiving 36.2 mg less than white women (p = .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women of color with opioid use disorder received 67% of the dose of methadone at delivery that white women received. Antiracist responses to prevent provider bias in evaluating dose needs are needed to correct this inequity and prevent undertreatment of opioid use disorder among women of color.

Patient Experience with Postpartum Pain Management in the Face of the Opioid Crisis

INTRODUCTION

Professional societies have urged providers to reduce opioid use for pain management. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to assess patient experiences related to postpartum pain management in an effort to better understand potential paths to achieve such a reduction.

METHODS

This is a planned secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of opioid use following birth. In the primary study, women who received opioids as inpatients were queried about their pain management, including questions about pain experience, pain satisfaction, perceived areas for practice improvement, and the opportunity to leave additional comments. Participants who were prescribed opioids upon discharge completed postdischarge surveys with a similar opportunity for qualitative input. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method to identify themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

Of the 493 women enrolled in the primary analysis, 125 provided qualitative data. Three overarching themes regarding pain management were identified: positive experiences (n = 22), negative experiences (n = 19), and beliefs and preferences on opioid use and pain management (n = 28). Women with positive experiences reported satisfaction with timely pain medication administration and appreciation of open dialogue with their care team. In contrast, several negative experiences centered on tardy administration of pain medications, resulting in increased pain. Patients also perceived judgment, accusation, and excessive lecturing by staff when requesting opioid medications. Finally, participants expressed the necessity for opioids for postpartum pain management, as well as their desires for limiting opioid use, improved options for multimodal pain management, and increased communication with providers about pain regimens.

DISCUSSION

Understanding women's perspectives and experiences regarding postpartum pain control is essential to improving care. Amid growing research on the role of maternity care providers in addressing the opioid crisis, women's voices are rarely solicited. These findings stress the importance of open and frequent dialogue between patients and providers and a need for multimodal pain management options.

Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean: Current and Emerging Trends

Purpose of Review

What are the latest enhanced recovery elements for cesarean delivery?

Recent Findings

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) provides an evidenced-based system to improve maternal outcomes, functional recovery, maternal-infant bonding, and patient experience. Postsurgical recovery has evolved from a one-dimensional pain score to a holistic multidimensional approach emphasizing faster functional recovery. ERAC involves multidisciplinary efforts of the anesthesiologist, obstetrician, nursing, hospital, and patient. Components of ERAC include preoperative patient education, limited fasting, carbohydrate load, limiting opioids intra- and postoperatively, using scheduled non-opioid analgesics and supplementing with advanced therapies for women at higher risk for pain. ERAC protocols reduce opioid consumption, reduce length of stay, and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Summary

Implementing ERAC standardized care will likely be the most important change you can make in your practice to improve outcomes, improve quality care, help address racial disparities, and minimize opioid exposure and potential for addiction.

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial evaluating pain and opioid use after dilator placement for second-trimester abortion

OBJECTIVES

To compare pain levels and medication needs after placement of laminaria vs Dilapan-S, and after dilation and evacuation (D&E).

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a single-blinded randomized control trial of patients undergoing D&E at 15 0/7 to 23 6/7 weeks gestation, randomizing to cervical preparation with laminaria or Dilapan-S. We compared pain levels and medication usage following dilator placement (5 minutes; 2, 4, and 8 hours; the following morning) and D&E (1, 4, 24, and 48 hours). Our primary outcome was median change from baseline pain, and secondary outcomes included maximum pain timing and overall narcotic use. We compared baseline characteristics, median pain increases and quantities of narcotics used.

RESULTS

We analyzed 67 participants with laminaria (n = 34) and Dilapan-S (n = 33). More Dilapan-S users had a prior vaginal delivery (n = 20, 60.6%) than laminaria users (n = 11, 32.4%), p = 0.02. Maximum median pain was not statistically different (Laminaria: +3.5 (interquartile range [IQR] +0.5, +6.5); Dilapan-S: +3 (IQR +1, +5); p = 0.42. Thirty-seven (63.8%) participants reported higher levels of pain following dilator placement than D&E. Overall, 26 (42.6%) participants used narcotics during their abortion episode, with no difference in median number of tablets between laminaria (2, range 1-8) and Dilapan-S (4.5, range 1-15) participants (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Median pain increase did not differ in participants receiving laminaria or Dilapan-S for cervical preparation prior to D&E. The majority of patients will use a small amount of narcotics if available.

IMPLICATIONS

The lack of difference in pain between laminaria and Dilapan-S enhances the applicability of pain intervention research across dilator types. With over half of participants using a small amount of narcotics during their D&E episode, pain management should be individualized to patient needs.

The impact of standard postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines on racial differences in opioid prescribing: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in opioid prescribing are widely documented, though few studies assess racial differences in the postoperative setting specifically. We hypothesized standard opioid prescribing schedules reduce total opioids prescribed postoperatively and mitigate racial variation in postoperative opioid prescribing.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of adult general surgery cases at a large, public academic institution. Standard opioid prescribing schedules were implemented across general surgery services for common procedures in late 2018 at various timepoints. Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare mean biweekly discharge morphine milligram equivalents prescribed in the preintervention (Jan-Jun 2018) versus postintervention (Jan-Jun 2019) periods for Black and White patients. Linear regression was used to compare mean difference in discharge morphine milligram equivalents among White and Black patients in each study period, while controlling for demographics, chronic opioid use, and procedure/service.

RESULTS

A total of 2,961 cases were analyzed: 1,441 preintervention and 1,520 postintervention. Procedural frequencies, proportion of Black patients (17% Black), and chronic opioid exposure (7% chronic users) were similar across time periods. Interrupted time series analysis showed significantly lower mean level of morphine milligram equivalents prescribed postintervention compared with the predicted nonintervention trend for both Black and White patients. Adjusted analysis showed on average in 2018 Black patients received significantly higher morphine milligram equivalents than White patients (+19 morphine milligram equivalents, 95% confidence interval 0.5-36.5). There was no significant difference in 2019 (-8 morphine milligram equivalents, 95% confidence interval -20.5 to 4.6).

CONCLUSION

Standard opioid prescribing schedules were associated with the elimination of racial differences in postoperative opioid prescribing after common general surgery procedures, while also reducing total opioids prescribed. We hypothesize standard opioid prescribing schedules may mitigate the effect of implicit bias in prescribing.

"Just Because You Have Ears Doesn't Mean You Can Hear"-Perception of Racial-Ethnic Discrimination During Childbirth

Background

Black and Latina women in New York City are twice as likely to experience a potentially life-threatening morbidity during childbirth than White women. Health care quality is thought to play a role in this stark disparity, and patient-provider communication is one aspect of health care quality targeted for improvement. Perceived health care discrimination may influence patient-provider communication but has not been adequately explored during the birth hospitalization.

Purpose

Our objective was to investigate the impact of perceived racial-ethnic discrimination on patient-provider communication among Black and Latina women giving birth in a hospital setting.

Methods

We conducted four focus groups of Black and Latina women (n=27) who gave birth in the past year at a large hospital in New York City. Moderators of concordant race/ethnicity asked a series of questions on the women's experiences and interactions with health care providers during their birth hospitalizations. One group was conducted in Spanish. We used an integrative analytic approach. We used the behavioral model for vulnerable populations adapted for critical race theory as a starting conceptual model. Two analysts deductively coded transcripts for emergent themes, using constant comparison method to reconcile and refine code structure. Codes were categorized into themes and assigned to conceptual model categories.

Results

Predisposing patient factors in our conceptual model were intersectional identities (eg, immigrant/Latina or Black/Medicaid recipient), race consciousness ("…as a woman of color, if I am not assertive, if I am not willing to ask, then they will not make an effort to answer"), and socially assigned race (eg, "what you look like, how you talk"). We classified themes of differential treatment as impeding factors, which included factors overlooked in previous research, such as perceived differential treatment due to the relationship with the infant's father and room assignment. Themes for differential treatment co-occurred with negative provider communication attributes (eg, impersonal, judgmental) or experience (eg, not listened to, given low priority, preferences not respected).

Conclusions

Perceived racial-ethnic discrimination during childbirth influences patient-provider communication and is an important and potentially modifiable aspect of the patient experience. Interventions to reduce obstetric health care disparities should address perceived discrimination, both from the provider and patient perspectives.

Placebo hypoalgesia: racial differences

No large-cohort studies that examine potential racial effects on placebo hypoalgesic effects exist. To fill this void, we studied placebo effects in healthy and chronic pain participants self-identified as either African American/black (AA/black) or white. We enrolled 372 study participants, 186 with a diagnosis of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and 186 race-, sex-, and age-matched healthy participants to participate in a placebo experiment. Using a well-established paradigm of classical conditioning with verbal suggestions, each individual pain sensitivity was measured to calibrate the temperatures for high- and low-pain stimuli in the conditioning protocol. These 2 temperatures were then paired with a red and green screen, respectively, and participants were told that the analgesic intervention would activate during the green screens to reduce pain. Participants then rated the painfulness of each stimulus on a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 100. Racial influences were tested on conditioning strength, reinforced expectations, and placebo hypoalgesia. We found that white participants reported greater conditioning effects, reinforced relief expectations, and placebo effects when compared with their AA/black counterparts. Racial effects on placebo were observed in TMD, although negligible, short-lasting, and mediated by conditioning strength. Secondary analyses on the effect of experimenter-participant race and sex concordance indicated that same experimenter-participant race induced greater placebo hypoalgesia in TMDs while different sex induced greater placebo hypoalgesia in healthy participants. This is the first and largest study to analyze racial effects on placebo hypoalgesia and has implications for both clinical research and treatment outcomes.