10 Years of Emergency Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortoiliac Aneurysms: Lessons Learned

Complex common and internal iliac or aortoiliac aneurysms and current approach: individualised open-endovascular or combined procedures

Objective. Bilateral internal iliac artery aneurysms constitute the utmost configuration of infrarenal aortoiliac disease. We detail characteristic aortoiliac disease patterns and reconstructive techniques we have used, along with a visualized decision-making chart and a short review of the literature. Material and Methods. A retrospective, observational study of twelve clinical cases of patients with aortoiliac disease are described. Two patients had a common iliac artery aneurysm and were managed by the application of inversed stent-grafts; another case was repaired by the insertion of a standard bifurcated stent-graft flared in the right common iliac artery and with an iliac branched device in the left iliac arterial axis. Open approach was used in 5 cases and in 4 cases a combination of aortouniliac stent-grafting with femoral-femoral bypass was applied. Results. Technical success was 100%. One endoleak type Ib in a flared iliac limb was observed and corrected by internal iliac embolism and use of an iliac limb stent-graft extension. We report 100% patency rate during 26.3 months of followup. Conclusion. Individualized techniques for the management of isolated iliac or aortoiliac aneurismal desease with special concern in maintaining internal iliac artery perfusion lead to elimination of perioperative complications and long-term durability and patency rates.

Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the UK

Outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are improving in the UK, at least in part as a result of vascular specialization, the reconfiguration of services to dedicated vascular centres and the advent of the national screening programme.

Endovascular balloon occlusion is associated with reduced intraoperative mortality of unstable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm but fails to improve other outcomes

BACKGROUND

Proximal aortic control by endovascular balloon occlusion (EBO) is an alternative to conventional aortic cross-clamping (CAC) in hemodynamically unstable patients presenting with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of EBO over CAC.

METHODS

Data from 72 patients with rAAA treated at our institution from 2001 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were hemodynamically unstable (mean arterial blood pressure at admission <65 mm Hg or associated unconsciousness, cardiac arrest, or emergency endotracheal intubation). Clinical end points of hemodynamic restoration, mortality rate, and major postoperative complications were assessed for CAC (group 1) and EBO (group 2).

RESULTS

At admission, 72 patients were unstable. CAC was performed in 40 and EBO in 32. Intraoperative mortality was 43% in group 1 vs 19% in group 2 (P = .031). In group 1, the approach for CAC (thoracotomy [n = 23] vs laparotomy [n = 17]) did not influence intraoperative mortality (43% vs 41%). There was no significant difference in 30-day (75% vs 62%) and in-hospital (77% vs 69%) mortality rates between groups. After EBO, the treatment-open vs endovascular repair-did not influence the intraoperative mortality rate (31% vs 43%; P = .5). Eight surgical complications were secondary to CAC (1 vena cava injury, 3 left renal vein injuries, 1 left renal artery injury, 1 pancreaticoduodenal vein injury, and 2 splenectomies), but no EBO-related complication was noted (P = .04). Differences in colon ischemia (15% vs 28%) and renal failure (12% vs 9%) were not statistically significant. Abdominal compartment syndrome occurred in four patients in group 2 and in no patients in group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CAC, EBO is a feasible and valuable strategy and is associated with reduced intraoperative mortality of unstable rAAA patients, but not in-hospital mortality, in this retrospective study.

Surgical and anesthetic considerations for the endovascular treatment of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (rDTAA) is a life-threatening disease. In the last decade, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has evolved as a viable option and is now considered the preferred treatment for rDTAAs. New opportunities as well as new challenges are faced by both the surgeon and the anesthesiologist. This review describes the impact of current developments and new modalities for the surgical and anesthetic management of rDTAAs.

RECENT FINDINGS

A collaborative approach between the anesthesiologist and surgeon during critical moments such as induction, moment of aortic occlusion and placement of the aortic stent-graft is mandatory. Important issues to consider on preoperative imaging evaluation are correct sizing of the aortic stent-graft and localization of the artery of Adamkiewicz. Emergency TEVAR should preferentially be started under local anesthesia and could be switched to general anesthesia after stent placement. Patients should be kept in permissive hypotension preoperatively and during the intervention before stent-graft deployment and relative hypertension after deployment. The use of a proactive spinal cord protection protocol could decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia and/or paraplegia and consists of permissive hypertension after stent deployment, cerebrospinal fluid drainage to maintain adequate spinal cord perfusion, relative hypothermia and possibly use of mannitol.

SUMMARY

In order to improve outcomes of TEVAR for rDTAA, a close communication between the anesthesiologist and the surgeon and a thorough understanding of the events during the procedure is mandatory. The use of a proactive spinal cord protection protocol may decrease the rates of devastating spinal cord ischemia.

Integration of endovascular therapy of ruptured abdominal and iliac aneurysms in the treatment algorithm: a single-center experience in a medium-volume vascular center

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of endovascular therapy of ruptured abdominal or iliac aneurysms on total mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the mortality of 40 patients from 2005 to 2009, when only surgical treatment was available. These results were compared with the period 2010 to 2013, when endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was assessed as the first option in selected patients.

RESULTS

During 2005 to 2009, the mortality was 37.5%. From 2010 to 2013, 45 patients were treated with mortality 28.9%. Open repair was performed in 35 (77.8%) patients and EVAR in 10 (22.2%) patients. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates of the EVAR group were 0% and 20%, respectively, and the total mortality rate was 30% during follow-up (median 11 months, range 1-42 months). The 30-day mortality in the surgical group remained unchanged, at 37.1%, and 1-year and total mortality rates were 45.7% and 51.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Following integration in the treatment algorithm, EVAR decreased total mortality in our center by 8.6%.

Rupture signs on computed tomography, treatment, and outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture has a high mortality rate. Although the diagnosis of a ruptured AAA is usually straightforward, detection of impending rupture signs can be more challenging. Early diagnosis of impending AAA rupture can be lifesaving. Furthermore, differentiating between impending and complete rupture has important repercussions on patient management and prognosis. The purpose of this article is to classify and illustrate the entire spectrum of AAA rupture signs and to review current treatment options for ruptured AAAs.

METHODS

Using medical illustrations supplemented with computed tomography (CT), this essay showcases the various signs of impending rupture and ruptured AAAs. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair are also discussed as treatment options for ruptured AAAs.

RESULTS

CT imaging findings of ruptured AAAs can be categorised according to location: intramural, luminal, and extraluminal. Intramural signs generally indicate impending AAA rupture, whereas luminal and extraluminal signs imply complete rupture. EVAR has emerged as an alternative and possibly less morbid method to treat ruptured AAAs.

CONCLUSIONS

AAA rupture occurs at the end of a continuum of growth and wall weakening. This review describes the CT imaging findings that may help identify impending rupture prior to complete rupture.

TEACHING POINTS

• AAA rupture occurs at the end of a continuum of growth and wall weakening. • Intramural imaging findings indicate impending AAA rupture. • Luminal and extraluminal imaging findings imply complete AAA rupture. • Some imaging findings are not specific to AAA ruptures and can be seen in other pathologies. • EVAR has emerged as an alternative and possibly less morbid method of treating ruptured AAAs.

Effect of regional cooperation on outcomes from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Care for patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in the Amsterdam ambulance region (The Netherlands) was concentrated into vascular centres with a 24-h full emergency vascular service in cooperation with seven referring regional hospitals. Previous population-based survival after rAAA in the Netherlands was 46 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 43 to 49) per cent. It was hypothesized that regional cooperation would improve survival.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational cohort study carried out simultaneously with the Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial. Consecutive patients with an rAAA between 2004 and 2011 in all ten hospitals in the Amsterdam region were included. The primary outcome was 30-day survival after admission. Multivariable logistic regression, including age, sex, co-morbidity, intervention (endovascular or open repair), preoperative systolic blood pressure, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and year of intervention, was used to assess the influence of hospital setting on survival.

RESULTS

Of 453 patients with rAAA from the Amsterdam ambulance region, 61 did not undergo intervention; 352 patients were treated surgically at a vascular centre and 40 at a referring hospital. The regional survival rate was 58.5 (95 per cent c.i. 53.9 to 62.9) per cent (265 of 453). After multivariable adjustment, patients treated at a vascular centre had a higher survival rate than patients treated surgically at a referring hospital (adjusted odds ratio 3.18, 95 per cent c.i. 1.43 to 7.04).

CONCLUSION

After regional cooperation, overall survival of patients with an rAAA improved. Most patients were treated in a vascular centre and in these patients survival rates were optimal.

Improved results in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm may not be on the basis of endovascular aneurysm repair alone

Recent improvement in the survival of patients presenting with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has been credited to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We present our clinical series in the management of rAAA from 2007 to 2011. A total of 55 consecutive patient charts were reviewed. Thirty-eight patients underwent EVAR, 17 of the 55 patients did not have favorable anatomy for EVAR. Nine of the 17 patients underwent standard open repair. Eight patients underwent a 'hybrid repair' defined as suprarenal aortic endovascular balloon control followed by open repair. Overall 30-day mortality for all 55 patients was 22%. Mortality for the patients managed by endovascular aortic aneurysm repair was 26% compared with 22% with open repair. There were no deaths in the eight patients undergoing the hybrid repair. Endovascular balloon control of the aorta followed by open rAAA repair in patients who are not candidates for rEVAR has produced good results in our experience. Improved results being reported in the management of rAAA may not be on the basis of endovascular repair alone.

Resuscitative Thoracotomy: An Update

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative thoracotomy is a heroic procedure that may offer the only survival hope for trauma patients in extremis. However, this operation has been the subject of much debate and its use, feasibility, outcomes, and cost are being continuously re-evaluated.

METHODS

This is a review of the most current (after 2000) literature on resuscitative thoracotomy, based on computer database searches for studies on resuscitative thoracotomy, emergency department thoracotomy, and emergency thoracotomy. Studies were selected for inclusion in this review based on their relevance and contribution to our understanding of resuscitative thoracotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies were included, and the following resuscitative thoracotomy-related topics were critically discussed: indications, biochemical profile, long-term outcome, organ donation, pre-hospital use, military use, international aspects, intra-aortic balloon occlusion, suspended animation, and cost and occupational exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that the indications for resuscitative thoracotomy become clearer and that new information is available regarding its use in the pre-hospital urban environment and military settings. Furthermore, it points to new strategies to supplement resuscitative thoracotomy including intra-aortic balloon occlusion and suspended animation. Finally, it sheds light on the long-term outcomes, organ donation, and cost and occupational exposure following resuscitative thoracotomy.

Observations from the IMPROVE trial concerning the clinical care of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Single-centre series of the management of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are usually too small to identify clinical factors that could improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

IMPROVE is a pragmatic, multicentre randomized clinical trial in which eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm were allocated to a strategy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or to open repair. The influences of time and manner of hospital presentation, fluid volume status, type of anaesthesia, type of endovascular repair and time to aneurysm repair on 30-day mortality were investigated according to a prespecified plan, for the subgroup of patients with a proven diagnosis of ruptured or symptomatic AAA. Adjustment was made for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Some 558 of 613 randomized patients had a symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm: diagnostic accuracy was 91·0 per cent. Patients randomized outside routine working hours had higher operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·47, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·00 to 2·17). Mortality rates after primary and secondary presentation were similar. Lowest systolic blood pressure was strongly and independently associated with 30-day mortality (51 per cent among those with pressure below 70 mmHg). Patients who received EVAR under local anaesthesia alone had greatly reduced 30-day mortality compared with those who had general anaesthesia (adjusted OR 0·27, 0·10 to 0·70).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the outcome of ruptured AAA might be improved by wider use of local anaesthesia for EVAR and that a minimum blood pressure of 70 mmHg is too low a threshold for permissive hypotension.

A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation

BACKGROUND

A requirement for improved methods of hemorrhage control and resuscitation along with the translation of endovascular specialty skills has resulted in reappraisal of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for end-stage shock. The objective of this report was to describe implementation of REBOA in civilian trauma centers.

METHODS

Descriptive case series of REBOA (December 2012 to March 2013) used in scenarios of end-stage hemorrhagic shock at the University of Maryland, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, and Herman Memorial Hospital, The Texas Trauma Institute, Houston, Texas.

RESULTS

REBOA was performed by trauma and acute care surgeons for blunt (n = 4) and penetrating (n = 2) mechanisms. Three cases were REBOA in the descending thoracic aorta (Zone I) and three in the infrarenal aorta (Zone III). Mean (SD) systolic blood pressure at the time of REBOA was 59 (27) mm Hg, and mean (SD) base deficit was 13 (5). Arterial access was accomplished using both direct cutdown (n = 3) and percutaneous (n = 3) access to the common femoral artery. REBOA resulted in a mean (SD) increase in blood pressure of 55 (20) mm Hg, and the mean (SD) aortic occlusion time was 18 (34) minutes. There were no REBOA-related complications, and there was no hemorrhage-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

REBOA is a feasible and effective means of proactive aortic control for patients in end-stage shock from blunt and penetrating mechanisms. With available technology, this method of resuscitation can be performed by trauma and acute care surgeons who have benefited from instruction on a limited endovascular skill set. Future work should be aimed at devices that allow easy, fluoroscopy-free access and studies to define patients most likely to benefit from this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level V.

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: technical and team training in an immersive virtual reality environment

PURPOSE

This study evaluates a fully immersive simulated angiosuite for training and assessment of technical endovascular and human factor skills during a crisis scenario.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Virtual reality (VIST-C, Mentice) simulators were integrated into a simulated angiosuite (ORCAMP, Orzone). Teams, lead by experienced (N = 5) or trainee (N = 5) endovascular specialists, performed simulated endovascular ruptured aortic aneurysm repair (rEVAR). Timed performance metrics were recorded as surrogate measures of performance. Participants (N = 22) completed postprocedure questionnaires evaluating face validity, as well as technical and human factor aspects, of the simulation on a Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

RESULTS

Experienced team leaders were significantly faster than trainees in obtaining proximal control with an intra-aortic occlusion balloon (352 vs. 501 s, p = 0.047) and all completed the procedure within the allotted time, whilst no trainee was able to do so. Total fluoroscopy times were significantly lower in the experienced group (782 vs. 1,086 s, p = 0.016). Realism of the simulated angiosuite was scored highly by experienced team leaders (median 4/5, IQR 4-5). Participants found the simulation useful for acquiring technical (4/5, IQR 4-5) and communication skills (4/5, IQR 4-5) and particularly valuable for enhancing teamwork (5/5, IQR 4-5) and patient safety (5/5, IQR 4-5).

CONCLUSION

This study shows feasibility of creation of a crisis scenario in a fully immersive angiosuite simulation and team performance of a simulated rEVAR. Performance metrics differentiated between experienced specialists and trainees, and the realism of the simulation exercise and environment were rated highly by experienced endovascular specialists. This simulation has potential as a powerful training and assessment tool with opportunities to improve team performance in rEVAR through both technical and human factor skills training.

A novel fluoroscopy-free, resuscitative endovascular aortic balloon occlusion system in a model of hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a potentially lifesaving maneuver in the setting of hemorrhagic shock. However, emergent use of REBOA is limited by existing technology, which requires large sheath arterial access and fluoroscopy-guided balloon positioning. The objectives of this study were to describe a new, fluoroscopy-free REBOA system and to compare its efficacy to existing technology. An additional objective was to characterize the survivability of 60 minutes of REBOA using these systems in a model of hemorrhagic shock.

METHODS

Swine (70-88 kg) in shock underwent 60 minutes of REBOA using either a self-centering, one component prototype balloon system (PBS, n = 8) inserted (8 Fr) and inflated without fluoroscopy or a two-component, commercially available balloon system (CBS, n = 8) inserted (14 Fr) with fluoroscopic guidance. Following REBOA, resuscitation occurred for 48 hours with blood, crystalloid, and vasopressors. End points included accurate balloon positioning, hemodynamics, markers of ischemia, resuscitation requirements, and mortality.

RESULTS

Posthemorrhage mean arterial pressure (mm Hg) was similar in the CBS and PBS groups (35 [8] vs. 34 [5]; p = 0.89). Accurate balloon positioning and inflation occurred in 100% of the CBS and 88% of the PBS group. Following REBOA, mean arterial pressure increased comparably in the CBS and PBS groups (81 [20] vs. 89 [16]; p = 0.21). Lactate peaked in the CBS and PBS groups (10.8 [1.4] mmol/L vs. 13.2 [2.1] mmol/L; p = 0.01) 45 minutes following balloon deflation but returned to baseline by 24 hours. Mortality was similar between the CBS and PBS groups (12% vs. 25%, p = 0.50).

CONCLUSION

This study reports the feasibility and efficacy of a novel, fluoroscopy-free REBOA system in a model of shock. Despite a significant physiologic insult, 60 minutes of REBOA is tolerated and recoverable. Development of lower profile, fluoroscopy-free endovascular balloon occlusion catheters may allow proactive aortic control in patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock and cardiovascular collapse.

Intra-peritoneal microdialysis and intra-abdominal pressure after endovascular repair of ruptured aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate intra-peritoneal (ip) microdialysis after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in patients developing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH), requiring abdominal decompression.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 16 patients with rAAA treated with an emergency EVAR were followed up hourly for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), urine production and ip lactate, pyruvate, glycerol and glucose by microdialysis, analysed only at the end of the study. Abdominal decompression was performed on clinical criteria, and decompressed (D) and non-decompressed (ND) patients were compared.

RESULTS

The ip lactate/pyruvate (l/p) ratio was higher in the D group than in the ND group during the first five postoperative hours (mean 20 vs. 12), p = 0.005 and at 1 h prior to decompression compared to the fifth hour in the ND group (24 vs. 13), p = 0.016. Glycerol levels were higher in the D group during the first postoperative hours (mean 274.6 vs. 121.7 μM), p = 0.022. The IAP was higher only at 1 h prior to decompression in the D group compared to the ND group at the fifth hour (mean 19 vs. 14 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Ip l/p ratio and glycerol levels are elevated immediately postoperatively in patients developing IAH leading to organ failure and subsequent abdominal decompression.

Plugging and sealing technique by Onyx to prevent type II endoleak in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Control of back bleeding from the hypogastric artery into the aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of a ruptured aorto-iliac aneurysm may be necessary in order to avoid a type II endoleak. It is an emergency situation and selective catheterization and embolization of the hypogastric artery may be time-consuming and more importantly, it has to be performed before complete exclusion of the aneurysm has been established. We describe a plugging and sealing technique that embolizes the hypogastric artery after the exclusion of a ruptured aorto-iliac aneurysm using the embolizing agent Onyx. The mortality rate of the 16 patients treated in our institute with this technique was 25% (4/16) at 30-day and 31% (5/16) at 90-day follow up. One patient had a type II endoleak at one-year follow-up. The EVAR procedure can focus completely on controlling the acute life-threatening situation, with the embolization performed at the end of the procedure.

Endovascular vs open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has become first-line therapy at our institution and is performed under a standardized protocol. We compare perioperative mortality, midterm survival, and morbidity after EVAR and open surgical repair (OSR).

METHODS

Records were retrospectively reviewed from May 2000 to September 2010 for repair of infrarenal rAAAs. Primary end points included perioperative mortality and midterm survival. Secondary end points included acute limb ischemia, length of stay, ventilator-dependent respiratory failure, myocardial infarction, renal failure, abdominal compartment syndrome, and secondary intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using the t-test, χ(2) test, the Fisher exact test, and logistic regression calculations. Midterm survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Seventy-four infrarenal rAAAs were repaired, 19 by EVAR and 55 by OSR. Despite increased age and comorbidity in the EVAR patients, perioperative mortality was 15.7% for EVAR, which was significantly lower than the 49% for OSR (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.74; P = .008). Midterm survival also favored EVAR (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.77; P = .028, adjusted for age and sex). Mean follow-up was 20 months, and 1-year survival was 60% for EVAR vs 45% for OSR. Mean length of stay for patients surviving >1 day was 10 days for EVAR and 21 days for OSR (P = .004). Ventilator-dependent respiratory failure was 5% in the EVAR group vs 42% for OSR (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.62; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

EVAR of rAAA has a superior perioperative survival advantage and decreased morbidity vs OSR. Although not statistically significant, overall survival favors EVAR. We recommend that EVAR be considered as the first-line treatment of rAAAs and practiced as the standard of care.

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm does not confer survival benefits over open repair

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is being increasingly performed despite lack of good evidence for its superiority. Other reported studies suffer from patient selection and publication bias with limited follow-up. This study is a single-center propensity score comparing early and midterm outcomes between open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular repair of rAAA (REVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective review from January 2001 to November 2010 identified 312 patients who underwent rAAA repairs. Thirty-one patients with antecedent AAA repair and three with incomplete records were excluded, leaving 37 REVARs and 241 OSRs. Propensity score-based matching for sex, age, preoperative hemodynamic status, surgeon's annual AAA volume, and preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in a 1:3 ratio to compare outcomes. Thirty-seven REVARs were matched with 111 OSRs. Late survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Operative time and blood replacement were higher with OSR. Overall complication rates were similar (54% REVAR vs 66% OSR; P = .23), except for higher incidences of tracheostomies (21% vs 3%; P = .015), myocardial infarction (38% vs 18%; P = .036), and acute tubular necrosis (47% vs 21%; P = .009) with OSR. Operative mortality rates were similar (22% REVAR vs 32% OSR), with an odds ratio of 0.63 for REVAR (95% confidence interval = [0.24, 1.48]; P = .40). No differences in the incidences for secondary interventions for aneurysm- or graft-related complications were noted (22% REVAR vs 22% OSR; P = .99). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were also similar (50%, 50%, 42% REVAR vs 54%, 52%, 47% OSR; P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

REVAR for rAAA does not seem to conclusively confer either acute or late survival advantages. Routine use of REVAR should be deferred until prospective, randomized trial data become available.

Endovascular suitability and outcome after open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has rapidly gained popularity, but superior results may be biased by patient selection. The aim was to investigate whether suitability for endovascular repair predicted survival, irrespective of technique of repair.

Methods

Two blinded investigators independently evaluated preoperative computed tomography angiograms of a consecutive cohort of patients with rAAA. Patients were categorized either ‘suitable’ or ‘unsuitable’ for endovascular repair, if assessments agreed. If assessments disagreed, they were classified ‘borderline suitable’. Correlations between endovascular suitability and clinical outcome were adjusted for suspected confounding factors and tested for robustness using sensitivity analyses.

Results

A total of 248 patients with rAAA from January 2001 to December 2010 were included, of whom 237 (95·6 per cent) underwent open repair. Seventy patients (28·2 per cent) were classified as ‘suitable’ and 100 (40·3 per cent) as ‘unsuitable’ for endovascular repair; 63 (25·4 per cent) were considered ‘borderline suitable’. Fifteen (6·0 per cent) could not be assessed and were included in the sensitivity analyses. The postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 15·3 per cent (38 deaths). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that the odds of perioperative death increased 9·21 (95 per cent confidence interval 2·16 to 39·23) fold for ‘unsuitable’ rAAA (P = 0·003) and 6·80 (1·47 to 31·49) fold for ‘borderline’ rAAA (P = 0·014), compared with ‘suitable’ rAAA. This selection effect was robust across sensitivity analyses and sustained for at least 5 years of follow-up.

Conclusion

Endovascular suitability was an independent and strongly positive predictor of survival after open repair of rAAA.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in association with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the endovascular era: vigilance remains critical

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are common complications of ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms (rAAAs) and other abdominal vascular catastrophes even in the age of endovascular therapy. Morbidity and mortality due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ failure (MOF) are significant. Recognition and management of IAH are key critical care measures which may decrease morbidity and improve survival in these vascular patients. Two strategies have been utilized: expectant management with prompt decompressive laparotomy upon diagnosis of threshold levels of IAH versus prophylactic, delayed abdominal closure based upon clinical parameters at the time of initial repair. Competent management of the abdominal wound with preservation of abdominal domain is also an important component of the care of these patients. In this review, we describe published experience with IAH and ACS complicating abdominal vascular catastrophes, experience with ACS complicating endovascular repair of rAAAs, and techniques for management of the abdominal wound. Vigilance and appropriate management of IAH and ACS remains critically important in decreasing morbidity and optimizing survival following catastrophic intra-abdominal vascular events.

A quantitative and automatic echographic method for real-time localization of endovascular devices

Current imaging methods for catheter position monitoring during minimally invasive surgery do not provide an effective support to surgeons, often resulting in the choice of more invasive procedures. This study was conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of non-ionizing monitoring of endovascular devices through embedded quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods, providing catheter self-localization with respect to selected anatomical structures. QUS-based algorithms for real-time automatic tracking of device position were developed and validated on in vitro and ex vivo phantoms. A trans-esophageal ultrasound probe was adapted to simulate an endovascular device equipped with an intravascular ultrasound probe. B-mode images were acquired and processed in real time by means of a new algorithm for accurate measurement of device position. After off-line verification, automatic position calculation was found to be correct in 96% and 94% of computed frames in the in vitro and ex vivo phantoms, respectively. The average errors of distance measurements (bias ± 2SD) in a 41-step 10-cm-long parabolic pathway were 0.76 ± 3.75 mm or 0.52 ± 3.20 mm, depending on algorithm implementations. Our results showed the effectiveness of QUS-based tracking algorithms for real-time automatic calculation and display of endovascular system position. The method, validated for the case of an endoclamp balloon catheter, can be easily extended to most endovascular surgical systems.

A meta-analysis and metaregression analysis of factors influencing mortality after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors that may influence the perioperative mortality after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) using metaregression analysis.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of all English-language literature with information on mortality rates after endovascular repair of RAAAs was conducted. A metaregression was subsequently performed to determine the impact on mortality of the following 8 factors: patient age; mid-time study point; anaesthesia; endograft configuration; haemodynamic instability; use of aortic balloon; conversion to open repair; and abdominal compartment syndrome.

RESULTS

The pooled perioperative mortality across the 46 studies (1397 patients) was 24.3% (95% CI: 20.7-28.3%). Of the 8 variables, only bifurcated approach was significantly associated with reduced mortality (p = 0.005). A moderate negative correlation was observed between bifurcated approach and haemodynamic instability (-0.35). There was still a strong association between bifurcated approach and mortality after simultaneously adjusting for haemodynamic instability, indicating that the latter was not a major factor in explaining the observed association.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of RAAAs is associated with acceptable mortality rates. Patients having a bifurcated endograft were less likely to die. This may be due to some surgeons opting for a bifurcated approach in patients with better haemodynamic condition. Further studies will be needed to clarify this.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Endovascular treatment

Aim

The elective endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is nowadays a daily routine practice in selected patients. The traditional treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has a peri-operative mortality of 40–50% that has not changed in the last 20 years. Nowadays, the endovascular repair may reduce mortality, hospitalization and sanitary costs.

Methods

The study included 14 patients affected by AAA who came to the Emergency Department because of hemodynamic shock (nine patients) or back pain (five patients). All patients underwent a CT angiography before surgery. Forty-two percent of the patients presented with shock (systolic pressure ≤70 mm Hg) in the operating room, and they underwent an endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) as an emergency procedure. Five bifurcated endoprotesis and nine uniliac protesis making a femoro-femoral bypass to revascularize the excluded limb were made. Patients underwent a follow up with CT angiography one month and then six months after surgery and if no problems were detected, patients underwent a follow-up every year.

Results

Two cases were immediately converted to open surgery because of failed EVAR. Four patients (28%) died after surgery because of multi-organ failure (MOF). The mean hospitalization was 12 days (range 3–21 days). We observed only one case of first-type endoleak at the 1-month follow up and we successfully treated it with a proximal cuff.

Conclusion

In our experience, the intention-to-treat protocol for rAAA offered acceptable results in terms of mortality rates. Multicenter studies are necessary to establish the role of endovascular treatment in patients with rAAA.

Endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with bilateral iliac dissections

BACKGROUND

The presentation of a ruptured fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) co-occurring with bilateral iliac dissections is extremely rare. Endovascular repair of ruptured AAA is an accepted treatment modality for suitable patients; however, this approach may be complicated by the presence of iliac arterial pathology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report the case of a 66-year-old man who presented with a ruptured AAA. Preoperative imaging demonstrated bilateral iliac artery dissections in addition to the ruptured AAA. We describe the technical aspects of the combined endovascular and open surgical repair required to manage this complex presentation.

CONCLUSION

The combined presentation of ruptured AAA and bilateral iliac dissections has not been previously reported. Successful repair can be achieved using a combined endovascular and open surgical approach.

Emergency endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the way forward?

We present the early results of a policy of treating all anatomically suitable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) by emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (eEVAR), regardless of hemodynamic instability. Data were retrospectively collected from prospectively maintained databases identifying patients with rAAA from 2006 to 2007. Forty-seven patients with true rAAA were identified (87% men; median age 76 years [range 63-97 years]), of whom 18 (38%) were treated with eEVAR, 19 (40%) received open aneurysm repair (OAR), and 10 (21%) were managed nonoperatively. Fifteen of 18 (83%) eEVAR patients received an aortouni-iliac device + femorofemoral crossover, 2 patients (11%) had bifurcated devices, and 1 patient (6%) had a new iliac limb. Thirty-day mortality was 11% (2 of 18) for eEVAR and 32% (6 of 19) for OAR (p = not significant). At the 6-month follow-up, mortality was 22% (4 of 18) for eEVAR and 37% (7 of 19) for OAR (p = not significant). A clinically significant early survival advantage is suggested for eEVAR in patients presenting with rAAA.

Logistic Considerations for a Successful Institutional Approach to the Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

The value of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the setting of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm remains controversial owing to differing results. However, interpretation of published results remains difficult as there is a lack of generally accepted protocols or standard operating procedures. Furthermore, such protocols and standard operating procedures often are reported incompletely or not at all, thereby making interpretation of results difficult. We herein report our integrated logistic system for the endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Important components of this system are prehospital logistics, in-hospital treatment logistics, and aftercare. Further studies should include details about all of these components, and a description of these logistic components must be included in all future studies of emergency EVAR for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Internal Sealing of Acute Aortic Bleeding with a Catheter-Delivered Liquid to Solid Embolic Agent (Onyx)

Occasionally, standard stent grafts are not usable in emergency aortic bleeding, and custom-made stent grafts are not practical as a replacement. We describe a novel technique for the repair of such aneurysms by using the catheter-delivered liquid to solid embolic agent Onyx (Micro Therapeutics Inc., Irvine, CA). Two patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm, where endovascular or open repair was not considered as feasible, were treated by internal sealing of the aneurysm with Onyx, resulting in stoppage of bleeding and further expansion of the aneurysm-the plugging and sealing technique.

Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Rural Center Is Both Feasible and Associated with Reduced Blood Product Requirements

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) has been shown to be both feasible and associated with a reduced operative mortality when compared with conventional open repair (OR). The aim of this study was to show the feasibility of EVAR of rAAA in a rural vascular unit and to investigate the blood product requirements when compared to OR. The method used in this study was a retrospective case note review of patients presenting with rAAA to a small, rural vascular unit between February 2004 and November 2008. Admission demographics and hematological variables were recorded. Volumes of crystalloid, colloid and blood products were recorded prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and for the first 48 hours following ICU admission. Results are expressed as medians and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare variables. Of 81 patients presenting with rAAA, 36 were treated palliatively. Of 45 patients who underwent intervention, 7 had EVAR and all survived to discharge (0% operative mortality). Of 38 who had OR, 16 died before discharge for an operative mortality of 42%, 36% if the EVAR patients are included. Admission demographics and hematological variables of patients who had EVAR, patients who had OR and survived (ORS) and patients who had OR and died (ORD) showed no significant difference. When compared with ORS patients, those undergoing EVAR had significantly less pre-ICU crystalloid (3 L vs 7.5 L, p = .001), less red blood cell transfusion (1 unit vs 6.5 units, p = .0006), and less colloid (0 L vs 0.5 L, p = .008). When compared with ORD, those undergoing EVAR had less red blood cell transfusion (1 unit vs 7 units, p = .0001) and less fresh frozen plasma (0 units vs 4 units, p = .03). Within the first 48 hours of admission to ICU, the blood product requirements were no different in those undergoing EVAR when compared with OR. EVAR of rAAA is feasible in a small rural vascular unit and appears to be associated with reduced requirements for blood products.