Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011;254:274-280. [PMID: 21772128 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182263911]

The optimal lymph node dissection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to refine the optimal lymph node dissection in Western patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy is essential in addition to surgery for AEG. Asian studies continually present superior survival rates using a more extended lymphadenectomy compared with results reproduced in the West. Thus, the optimal extend of the lymphadenectomy remains unclear in Western patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was conducted of patients with AEG from January 1st, 2003 to December 31st, 2011. All patients undergoing curatively intended surgery was included. Two types of resections were constructed; Res1 included patients where only the loco regional lymph nodes were removed (station 1-4, 7 and 9) and Res2 included the additional removal of the more distant stations 8 and/or 11.

RESULTS

We identified 510 patients with AEG. The highest frequency of lymph node metastases was seen in the loco regional stations 1-3, 7 and 9, ranging from 34% to 41.4%. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups; the median survival rate for Res1 was 30.4 months compared to 24.1 months for Res2 (p = 0.157). Furthermore, the extend of lymph node dissection seemed to have no effect on survival (HR = 1.061, 95%CI 0.84-1.33).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in survival between the extended and the less extended lymphadenectomy was found. The presence of metastases in distant lymph nodes indicates poor survival and may represent disseminated disease. We do not find evidence that supports an extended lymph node dissection in Western patients.

Recurrence Pattern and Lymph Node Metastasis of Adenocarcinoma at the Esophagogastric Junction

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) still is controversial despite revised tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcome of a routine transhiatal approach for AEJ in terms of recurrence and lymph node (LN) metastasis of AEJ.

METHODS

Recurrence patterns and LN metastasis of a single, primary AEJ (n = 463) treated by a surgical resection using a transhiatal approach without routine complete mediastinal LN dissection or routine splenectomy were analyzed respectively. To validate current treatment for recurrence, a validation index of recurrence (ViR; overall survival/incidence of solitary recurrence factor) was developed.

RESULTS

The overall recurrence rate for AEJ was 20.3%, which did not differ significantly between AEJ II (20.8%; n = 125) and AEJ III (20.1%; n = 338). Mediastinal recurrence did not differ significantly among the subtypes of AEJ, irrespective of gastroesophageal junction involvement. Splenic hilar LN recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly between the gastrectomy-only group, the gastrectomy-plus-splenectomy group, and the gastrectomy plus distal pancreatectomy group. The solitary recurrence rate for the mediastinal LN was 0.7% for AEJ, and the overall median survival with that recurrence was 30.5 months. The ViR for mediastinal LN recurrence (43.6) was higher than for regional LN (20.9) or distant LN (14.6) metastasis.

CONCLUSION

In terms of LN metastasis and recurrence, a transhiatal approach without complete mediastinal LN dissection can be acceptable, and routine splenectomy is not necessary for AEJ II or AEJ III arising within the stomach.

Appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

AIM

To investigate the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagogastric junction (ECJ).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 52 patients with SCC of the ECJ who underwent extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy. We assessed potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the upper/middle mediastinum by conducting univariate and multivariate analyses, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the therapeutic value index of each nodal basin dissection was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at the basin and the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with metastasis at that basin.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (38%) had mediastinal LNM; 13 (25%) had metastasis in the upper/middle mediastinum, and 13 (25%) had metastasis in the lower mediastinum. Tumor length (P = 0.03) and pathological nodal status (P = 0.01) were independent risk factors for upper/middle mediastinal LNM. The optimal ROC cutoff value of tumor length was 54 mm. The 5-year overall survival rate of the patients with LNM in the upper/middle mediastinum was 46%. The therapeutic value index of upper/middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy was 11.6, which was inferior to that of perigastric lymphadenectomy at 17.3, but superior to that of lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy at 5.8.

CONCLUSION

An upper/middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy may be required for patients with tumors that are ≥54 mm long, and in those with suspected LNM.

Clinicopathological features of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma: comparison of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma following endoscopic submucosal dissection

OBJECTIVES

Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma encompasses both gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) and Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) due to short-segment Barrett's esophagus. We compared these two types of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in terms of background factors and clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

We enrolled 139 patients (142 lesions) who underwent ESD from 2006 to 2014 at our institution. Background factors evaluated were age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, drinking, double cancer, and endoscopic findings. Clinical outcomes evaluated were procedure time, en bloc resection rate, curative resection rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 87 GCA lesions (61.2%) and 55 BEA lesions. Features of BEA [55 lesions (38.8%)] included a younger age, small diameter, and a protruding type, along with a high frequency of esophageal hiatal hernia and less mucosal atrophy. There were no significant differences in lifestyle-related background factors between the GCA and BEA groups. Curative resection rate was greater for GCA (81%) than for BEA (66%) (P = 0.01). There were no serious adverse events in either group. Among the factors for noncurative resection, lymphovascular invasion and depth of invasion were greater for BEA (33.3 vs. 7 and 20.7 vs. 8.2%, respectively (P < 0.01). Of the noncured patients, 70% underwent additional surgery and none had postoperative lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Siewert type II adenocarcinoma encompasses two types of cancers with different etiologies: GCA and BEA. Although there are no significant differences in lifestyle-related background factors between GCA and BEA, BEA is a risk factor for noncurative resection via ESD.

Lymph node dissection for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study of 136 cases

BACKGROUND

To compare the lymph node dissection with the right transthoracic Ivor-Lewis (IL) procedure to that with the left transthoracic (LT) approach for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric (AEG) junction.

METHODS

In this study, 136 patients with Siewert type II AEG who met the inclusion criteria underwent surgical resection were divided into the IL (47 cases) and LT (89 cases) groups. The number and frequency of the dissected lymph nodes in each station were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The IL group had a longer proximal surgical margin (P = 0.000) and more total (P = 0.000), thoracic (P = 0.000), and abdominal lymph nodes (P = 0.000) dissected than the LT group. In general, the IL group had a higher dissection rate in each thoracic lymph node station (P < 0.05) than the LT group. The dissection rates of the hepatic artery, splenic artery and celiac trunk lymph nodes were higher in the IL group than in the LT group (P < 0.05). The lymph node metastasis rate was 78.7% in the IL group, higher than the 61.8% in the LT group (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

The right transthoracic IL procedure was demonstrated to be a better application than the LT approach for Siewert type II AEG in terms of the number and frequency of lymph node resections.

Optimal treatment for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up

AIM

To determine the optimal treatment strategy for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 83 patients with Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and calculated both an index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection for each lymph node (LN) station and a lymph node ratio (LNR: ratio of number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of dissected lymph nodes). We used Cox proportional hazard models to clarify independent poor prognostic factors. The median duration of observation was 73 mo.

RESULTS

Indices of estimated benefit from LN dissection were as follows, in descending order: lymph nodes (LN) along the lesser curvature, 26.5; right paracardial LN, 22.8; left paracardial LN, 11.6; LN along the left gastric artery, 10.6. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 58%. Cox regression analysis revealed that vigorous venous invasion (v2, v3) (HR = 5.99; 95%CI: 1.71-24.90) and LNR of > 0.16 (HR = 4.29, 95%CI: 1.79-10.89) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

LN along the lesser curvature, right and left paracardial LN, and LN along the left gastric artery should be dissected in patients with Siewert type II or III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Patients with vigorous venous invasion and LNR of > 0.16 should be treated with aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival outcomes.

Different time trend and management of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has been on the increase in Western countries. However, in Asian countries, data on the incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma are evidently lacking. In the present review, we focus on the current clinical situation of EGJ adenocarcinoma in three Asian countries: Japan, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. The incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma has been reported to be gradually increasing in Malaysia and Japan, whereas it has stabilized in Hong Kong. However, the number of cases in these countries is comparatively low compared with Western countries. A reason for the reported difference in the incidence and time trend of EGJ adenocarcinoma among the three countries may be explained by two distinct etiologies: one arising from chronic gastritis similar to distal gastric cancer, and the other related to gastroesophageal reflux disease similar to esophageal adenocarcinoma including Barrett's adenocarcinoma. This review also shows that there are several concerns in clinical practice for EGJ adenocarcinoma. In Hong Kong and Malaysia, many EGJ adenocarcinomas have been detected at a stage not amenable to endoscopic resection. In Japan, histological curability criteria for endoscopic resection cases have not been established. We suggest that an international collaborative study using the same definition of EGJ adenocarcinoma may be helpful not only for clarifying the characteristics of these cancers but also for improving the clinical outcome of these patients.

Potential impact of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for low rectal cancer on prognoses and local control: A comparison of 2 high-volume centers in Japan that employ different policies concerning LLND

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains around whether the addition of lateral lymph node dissection to total mesorectal excision offers benefits in terms of survival or local control to patients with low rectal cancer. This study aimed to examine the impact of lateral lymph node dissection in the treatment of low rectal cancer on prognosis and local control and to identify patients who might benefit from lateral lymph node dissection at 2 high-volume centers in Japan that employ different policies with regard to adopting lateral lymph node dissection.

METHODS

We reviewed outcomes from a total of 1,191 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer (rectal cancer distal to the peritoneal reflection) who underwent total mesorectal excision plus lateral lymph node dissection at 2 high-volume centers (the National Cancer Center and Aichi Cancer Center) in Japan. To assess the therapeutic outcomes of the respective node dissections, we applied an index calculated by multiplying the incidence by the 5-year overall survival of patients with metastasis in the respective lateral node stations. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors for local recurrence and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Outcomes according to the presence or absence of lateral nodal metastases showed long-term survival with lateral dissection, even in patients with lateral nodal metastases (5-year overall survival: 53.1% at the National Cancer Center vs 45.2% at Aichi Cancer Center), while stage I to III patients with no lateral nodal metastases had very good prognoses at both centers (5-year overall survival: 81.7% at the National Cancer Center vs 81.0% at Aichi Cancer Center). According to the index of estimated benefit from lateral lymph node dissection, dissection of the distal internal iliac nodes and obturator nodes yielded the greatest therapeutic benefit in patients at both centers. Compared to patients with bilateral lateral lymph node dissection, the relative risk for local recurrence was 2.0 for those with unilateral lateral lymph node dissection.

CONCLUSION

Lateral lymph node dissection outcomes observed at the 2 high-volume centers in Japan demonstrate high reproducibility with good results in terms of prognosis. Differences in policies concerning the adoption of lateral lymph node dissection affected local recurrence rate.

Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodes examined in node-negative Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Involvement status of lymph node (LN) is one of the most important prognostic factors for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma. However, the prognostic value of the number of examined LNs remains unclear in node-negative (pN0) Siewert type II EGJ adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A cohort of 262 patients who underwent curative surgery for pN0 Siewert type II EGJ adenocarcinoma from January 2000 to August 2013 were retrospectively analyzed from high-volume center database. All enrolled patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the number of examined LNs (≤14, 15 to 21, ≥22). Kaplan-Meier curves were used for comparing the differences of cancer-specific survival among groups; Correlation between survival and the number of examined LNs were analyzed by using stratified, uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The hazard ratio for cancer-specific mortality decreased sequentially with increasing number of LNs examined. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 45.1%, 58.4% and 65.7% for patients with ≤14 LNs, 15 to 21 and ≥ 22 LNs removed, respectively. The number of removed LNs was significantly correlated with survival in stratified analyses according to T stage. In multivariate model controlling for gender, age, surgical approach, tumor grade, and postoperative chemotherapy, the number of removed LNs and T stage were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors and significantly correlated with disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

The number of examined LNs is an independent prognostic factor of survival for patients with pN0 Siewert type II EGJ adenocarcinoma. Adequate dissection of LNs (more than 15 LNs) is recommended for patients undergoing curative resection.

Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma has attracted considerable attention because of the marked increase in its incidence globally. However, the optimal extent of esophagogastric resection for this tumor entity remains highly controversial.

METHODS

This was a questionnaire-based national retrospective study undertaken in an attempt to define the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for EGJ cancer. Data from patients with EGJ carcinoma, less than 40 mm in diameter, who underwent R0 resection between January 2001 and December 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Clinical records of 2807 patients without preoperative therapy were included in the analysis. There are distinct disparities in terms of the nodal dissection rate according to histology and the predominant tumor location. Nodal metastases frequently involved the abdominal nodes, especially those at the right and left cardia, lesser curvature and along the left gastric artery. Nodes along the distal portion of the stomach were much less often metastatic, and their dissection seemed unlikely to be beneficial. Lower mediastinal node dissection might contribute to improving survival for patients with esophagus-predominant EGJ cancer. However, due to low dissection rates for nodes of the middle and upper mediastinum, no conclusive result was obtained regarding the optimal extent of nodal dissection in this region.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete nodal clearance along the distal portion of the stomach offers marginal survival benefits for patients with EGJ cancers less than 4 cm in diameter. The optimal extent of esophageal resection and the benefits of mediastinal node dissection remain issues to be addressed in managing patients with esophagus-predominant EGJ cancers.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Siewert Type II Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma is increasing, but its optimal surgical management remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the database of 400 patients with Siewert type II EGJ carcinoma who were treated surgically at 7 institutions between March 1986 and October 2010. We examined the clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors, and risk factors associated with each recurrence pattern.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients with Siewert type II EGJ carcinoma was 58.4 %. Multivariate analysis showed that T and N stages were independent prognostic factors. We also found that the incidence of lower mediastinal lymph node metastasis (17.7 %) and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (16.1 %) was relatively high. In addition, the para-aortic lymph nodes (N = 39, 9.8 %) were the most frequent node recurrence site, followed by the mediastinal lymph nodes (N = 23, 5.8 %). Lung recurrence was more common than was peritoneal recurrence. Considering each type of recurrence, multivariate analysis showed that the differentiated type was associated with a higher risk of lung recurrence than was the undifferentiated type, and N stage (pN2-3) and positive venous invasion were independent risk factors for liver recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of the largest retrospective studies to evaluate patients with Siewert type II EGJ carcinoma. Para-aortic and mediastinal lymph node metastasis and recurrence rates were relatively high. During the postoperative follow-up of patients with differentiated Siewert type II EGJ carcinoma, patients should be monitored for lung recurrence more closely than that for peritoneal recurrence.

Lymph node dissection for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study of 3 surgical procedures

The present study was aimed to investigate the application of right thansthoracic Ivor-Lewis (IL), left transthoracic (LTT), and left thoracoabdominal (LTA) approach in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG).The data of 196 patients with Siewert type II AEG received surgical resection in our cancer center between January 2014 and April 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 136 patients met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study and divided into the IL (47 cases), LTT (51 cases), and LTA group (38 cases). Clinical and short-term treatment effects were compared among the 3 groups.The patients with weight loss, diabetes, and heart disease increased in the LTT group (P = 0.054, P = 0.075, and P = 0.063, respectively). Operation time was significantly longest in the IL group (P < 0.001), but the amount of bleeding and tumor size did not significantly differ among the 3 groups (P = 0.176 and P = 0.228, respectively). The IL group had the significantly longest proximal surgical margin (P < 0.001) and most number of total (P < 0.001) and thoracic lymph nodes (P < 0.001) dissected. Both the IL and LTA groups had more abdominal lymph nodes dissected than the LTT group (P < 0.001). In general, the IL and LTT groups had the highest dissection rates of every station of thoracic (P < 0.05) and lower mediastinal lymph nodes (P < 0.05), respectively. The dissection rate of the paracardial, left gastric artery, and gastric lesser curvature lymph nodes did not differ significantly among the 3 groups (P > 0.05), but the dissection rate of the hepatic artery, splenic artery, and celiac trunk lymph nodes was significantly highest in the IL group (P < 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay, perioperative complications, and mortality did not differ significantly among the 3 groups (P > 0.05).Compared with the traditional left transthoracic approach, the Ivor-Lewis approach did not increase the perioperative mortality and complication rates in Siewert type II AEG, but obtained satisfactory length of the proximal surgical margin, and was better than the left transthoracic approach in thoracic and abdominal lymph node dissection. However, the advantages of Ivor-Lewis procedure requires further follow-up and validation through prospective randomized controlled trials.

Meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis in Siewert type I and II T1 adenocarcinomas

AIM

To evaluate the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and its risk factors in patients with Siewert type I and type II pT1 adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

We enrolled 85 patients [69 men, 16 women; median age (range), 67 (38-84) years] who had undergone esophagectomy or proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type I and type II pT1 adenocarcinomas. Predictive risk factors of LNM included age, sex, location of the tumor center, confirmed Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma, tumor size, macroscopic tumor type, pathology, invasion depth, presence of ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors predicting LNM. We also evaluated the frequencies of LNM for Siewert type I and type II pT1 adenocarcinomas in meta-data analysis.

RESULTS

LNMs were found in 11 out of 85 patients (12.9%, 95%CI: 5.8-20.0). Only 1 of the 15 patients (6.6%, 95%CI: 0.0-19.2) who had a final diagnosis of pT1a adenocarcinoma had a positive LNM, whereas 10 of the 70 patients (14.2%, 95%CI: 6.0-22.4) with a final diagnosis of pT1b adenocarcinoma had positive LNM. Furthermore, only one of the 30 patients (3.3%, 95%CI: 0.0-9.7) with a tumor invasion depth within 500 μm from muscularis mucosae had positive LNM. Poor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion were independently associated with a risk of LNM. In meta-data analysis, 12 of the 355 patients (3.3%, 95%CI: 1.5-5.2) who had a final diagnosis of pT1a adenocarcinoma had a positive LNM, whereas 91 of the 438 patients (20.7%, 95%CI: 16.9-24.5) with a final diagnosis of pT1b adenocarcinoma had positive LNM.

CONCLUSION

We consider endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is suitable for patients with Siewert type I and type II T1a adenocarcinomas. For patients with T1b adenocarcinoma, especially invasion depth is within 500 μm from muscularis mucosae with no other risk factor for LNM, diagnostic ESD could be a treatment option according to the overall status of patients and the presence of comorbidities.

Combination of concept and clinical practice - putting a high premium on neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is rising rapidly in recent years. The opinion that AEG is an independent disease different from squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric adenocarcinoma has been accepted by more and more scholars. R0 resection with D2 lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of treatment, but surgical techniques remain controversial with particular uncertainty about the operation ways, appropriate resection extent about the esophagus and stomach, and lymphadenectomy sites. Neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to a high rate of relapse after resection and poor survival rate for most patients with advanced disease at diagnosis. Although clinical literature and meta-analyses show that neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in a significant survival benefit at 5 years for resectable locally advanced AEG, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy also should be as a standard treatment for AEG versus surgery alone, the optimal regimens of neoadjuvant therapy and comparisons between preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy still need to be studied further.

Differences in prognosis of Siewert II and III oesophagogastric junction cancers are determined by the baseline tumour staging but not its anatomical location

BACKGROUND

The anatomical Siewert classification for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) was dictated by the potential differences in tumour epidemiology and pathology. However, there are some uncertainties whether the distinction of true carcinoma of the cardia (type II) and subcardial gastric cancer (type III) is of clinical value.

METHODS

Using a multicentre data set, we studied 243 patients with OGJ adenocarcinomas who underwent gastric resections between 1998 and 2008. Postoperative complications and long-term survival were compared to evaluate the potential differences in clinically relevant outcomes.

RESULTS

A group of 109 patients with Siewert type II and 134 with Siewert type III OGJ adenocarcinoma was identified. Both groups showed similar baseline characteristics, including clinical symptoms and duration of diagnostic delay. However, the prevalence of node-negative cancers and superficial (T1-T2) lesions was significantly higher among type II tumours, i.e. 42% vs 21% (P = 0.003) and 43% vs 20% (P = 0.045), respectively. Morbidity and mortality rates were 25% and 3.7%, respectively, but types and incidence of postoperative complications were not affected by the anatomical location of the tumour. The overall median survival was significantly longer for Siewert type II tumours (42 vs 16 months; P < 0.001). However, only patients' age >70 years, depth of tumour infiltration, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and radical resection were identified as independent prognostic factors using the Cox proportional hazards model.

CONCLUSION

The topographic-anatomic sub-classification of OGJ adenocarcinomas does not correspond to relevant differences in clinical parameters of safety and efficacy of surgical treatment.

Functional Advantages of Proximal Gastrectomy with Jejunal Interposition Over Total Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y Esophagojejunostomy for Early Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The postoperative functional advantages of a proximal gastrectomy over a total gastrectomy remain debatable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of a proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (PG-JI), compared with those for a total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (TG-RY), in patients with early gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2012, 65 patients underwent PG-JI and 117 underwent TG-RY for cT1 gastric cancer. Various parameters, including body weight, serum hemoglobin level, and interview-based symptoms, were prospectively evaluated in these patients. In patients who underwent PG-JI, the postoperative endoscopic findings were also assessed.

RESULTS

All the surgeries were performed via a laparotomy alone. During a median postoperative follow-up of 42 months (range, 12-78 months), PG-JI offered significant reductions in body weight loss (12.5 ± 5.8 vs. 17.4 ± 6.4 %, P < 0.001), serum hemoglobin decline (7.0 ± 5.7 vs. 9.7 ± 5.4 %, P = 0.002), and dumping symptoms (11 % [7/65] vs. 30 % [35/117], P = 0.003), while being associated with similar incidences of anastomotic stricture (9 % [6/65] vs. 8 % [9/117], P = 0.781), small bowel obstruction (0 % [0/65] vs. 2 % [2/117], P = 0.538), stasis symptoms (51 % [33/65] vs. 44 % [51/117], P = 0.358), and reflux symptoms (34 % [22/65] vs. 23 % [27/117], P = 0.121), compared with TG-RY. Four cases of gastric remnant cancer and no cases of endoscopic reflux esophagitis were found after PG-JI.

CONCLUSIONS

PG-JI has clear functional advantages over TG-RY, although it requires active surveillance for remnant gastric cancer.

The length of proximal margin does not influence the prognosis of Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after transhiatal curative gastrectomy

Background

The optimal length of proximal margin for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) is still need to be clarified. The aim of the present study was to investigate the appropriate length of proximal margin for Siewert type II/III AEJ through transhiatal approach.

Methods

From September 2009 to December 2014, a total of 693 consecutive patients with Siewert type II/III AEJ were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received transhiatal R0 resection. The proximal margin length was measured immediately after resection. The prognostic value of proximal margin length on Siewert type II/III AEJ with transhiatal approach was analyzed.

Results

There were 404 cases of Siewert type II AEJ (58.3 %) and 289 cases of Siewert type III AEJ (41.7 %). Total gastrectomy was performed in 526 patients (75.9 %), and proximal gastrectomy was performed in 167 patients (24.1 %). The median length of the gross proximal margin was 2.4 (range 0.1–5.0) cm. Lymph node metastasis was the only independent prognostic predictor for Siewert type II AEJ. Tumor size and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic predictors for Siewert type III AEJ.

Conclusions

For Siewert type II/III AEJ with esophageal invasion of 3 cm or less, proximal margin length does not influence the prognosis of patients after transhiatal curative gastrectomy.

Perioperative Treatment, Not Surgical Approach, Influences Overall Survival in Patients with Gastroesophageal Junction Tumors: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Resectable gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors are treated either with an esophageal-cardia resection or with gastrectomy. The difference in outcome between these two treatment modalities is unknown; Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate population-based treatment strategies for patients with resectable adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and to compare the oncological outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with potentially resectable GEJ tumors diagnosed between 2005 and 2012 were selected from the nationwide, population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Differences between patients were compared using the χ (2) test, and survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall multivariate survival was assessed using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Patients treated with esophagectomy (n = 939) were significantly younger than patients treated with gastrectomy (n = 257; 64 vs. 66 years; p < 0.001), and no differences were noted regarding lymph node yield, lymph node ratio, and radicality. Patients treated with an esophagectomy or gastrectomy exhibited comparable overall 5-year survival rates (36 vs. 33 %, respectively; p = 0.250). Multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving perioperative treatment and gastrectomy exhibited similar overall survival rates compared with patients receiving perioperative treatment and esophagectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.9, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.3; p = 0.908]; however, patients receiving esophagectomy alone (HR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.3-1.8; p = 0.002) or gastrectomy alone (HR 1.8, 95 % CI 1.4-2.4; p < 0.001) exhibited a significantly worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The chosen type of surgery (esophagectomy or gastrectomy) did not influence the overall survival in our cohort of patients with GEJ tumors. The administration of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy improved survival regardless of the surgical approach.

The survival benefit and safety of No. 12a lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with distal or total gastrectomy

There has still not been a consensus in aspects of survival benefit and safety on No.12a lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for gastric cancer patients. This study was aimed to evaluate this issue for patients with distal or total gastrectomy. Patients were retrospectively divided into 12aD+ group (with No.12a dissection) and 12aD-group (without No.12a dissection). Clinicopathologic characteristics, survival rate, morbidity and mortality were compared. There were 670 patients in 12aD+ group, while 567 in 12aD-group. The baselines between the two groups were comparable. The No.12a LNs metastasis ratio was 11.6% and higher in lower third tumor. The metastasis of No.5 LNs, N stage and M stage were correlated to metastasis of No.12a LNs. There was no difference in morbidity nor mortality between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival rates (5-y OS) were 59.6% and 55.1% in 12aD+ group and 12aD-group respectively (P = 0.075). The 5-y OS of patients with negative and positive No.12a LNs were 62.3% and 24.1%. The survival of stage III patients with No.12a positive was better than that of stage IV patients. The 5-y OS were better in 12aD+ group for patients with ages more than 60, lower third tumor, distal gastrectomy, N3 status, or III stages compared with 12aD-group. No.12a lymphadenectomy was independently better prognostic factors for stage III patients. No.12a LNs metastasis should not be considered as distant metastasis. No.12a lymphadenectomy can be performed safely and should be indicated for potentially curable progressive stage tumors requiring distal gastrectomy and might be reserved in patients with stage I or II, or upper third tumor.

Theoretical therapeutic impact of lymph node dissection on adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUNDS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the theoretical therapeutic impact of dissecting each lymph node station for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 431 junctional cancer patients (381 adenocarcinomas and 50 squamous cell carcinomas) who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) the center of the tumor was located between 1 cm above and 2 cm below the esophagogastric junction, and (2) the tumor invaded the junction. The theoretical therapeutic impact of dissecting each lymph node station was evaluated based on the therapeutic value index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis to each station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rates (95% confidence interval) were 60.4% (55.1-65.7) in the adenocarcinoma cases and 52.3% (35.6-69.0) in the squamous cell carcinoma cases. The nodal stations showing the first to fifth highest index were the paracardial and lesser curvature nodes (nos. 1, 2 and 3), nodes at the root of the left gastric artery (no. 7) and lower mediastinal lymph nodes, regardless of the histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal dissection achieved by proximal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy should be the minimal requirement for junctional cancer regardless of the histology, considering the therapeutic value indices for the relevant lymph node stations.

Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes and Prognoses in Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, by Transthoracic and Transabdominal Hiatal Approaches: A Teaching Hospital Retrospective Cohort Study

To compare the clinical outcomes and prognoses in patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (Siewert type II/III), by transthoracic and transabdominal hiatal approaches. Siewert II/III gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas patients (334 cases) underwent different surgical procedures at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from July 2007 to July 2012 and were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 140 patients underwent surgery by the transthoracic approach, and 194 patients underwent the transabdominal hiatal approach mainly with radical total and proximal gastrectomy (D2). All patients were followed up by telephone review or by outpatient reexamination until July 2013. The surgically related and clinical outcomes were compared using the χ2 test, t test, Fisher exact test, or nonparametric rank sum test according to different data. The survival curve was drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and survival analysis used Cox regression analysis. The operative time, length of resected esophagus, number of lymph nodes harvested, postoperative pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, time of antibiotics use, postoperative morbidity, and costs for the transabdominal surgery group were better than that of the transthoracic group. The overall 5-year survival rate was 35.3% and 40.3%, respectively, in the transthoracic and transabdominal surgery groups, and differences were not statistically significant (x2 = 2.311, P > 0.05). The hazard ratio of death for the transthoracic compared with the transabdominal approach was 1.27 (0.93-1.72, P > 0.05). According to tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging, stratification analysis showed that stage III patient overall survival rates were 25.7% and 37.2%, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (x2 = 4.127, P < 0.05). In uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for the transabdominal versus the transthoracic approach was 0.66 (0 43 to 0.99, P < 0.05) and 1.47 (1.05-2.06, P < 0.05), respectively. There were no significant differences of 5-year overall survival in TNM stage I and II of the Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma patients, but improved survival of TNM stage III patients undergoing transabdominal hiatal compared with transthoracic total radical and proximal gastrectomy. The short-term clinical outcomes improved with the transabdominal hiatial surgery group.

Ten-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial comparing left thoracoabdominal and abdominal transhiatal approaches to total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction or gastric cardia

Background

The optimal surgical approach for treatment of oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) cancer is controversial. A randomized clinical trial (JCOG9502) comparing transhiatal (TH) and left thoracoabdominal (LTA) approaches was stopped after the first interim analysis owing to limited efficacy for LTA resections. Complete 10‐year follow‐up data are now available.

Methods

Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the OGJ or gastric cardia with oesophageal invasion of 3 cm or less were randomized to a TH or LTA approach. Both groups underwent total gastrectomy and splenectomy with D2 nodal dissection plus para‐aortic lymphadenectomy above the left renal vein. For LTA, a thorough mediastinal lymphadenectomy below the left inferior pulmonary vein was also mandatory. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

Results

A total of 167 patients (82 TH, 85 LTA) were enrolled. The 10‐year overall survival rate was 37 (95 per cent c.i. 26 to 47) per cent for the TH approach and 24 (15 to 34) per cent for the LTA technique (P = 0·060). The hazard ratio for death was 1·42 (0·98 to 2·05) for the LTA technique. Subgroup analysis based on the Siewert classification indicated non‐significant survival advantages in favour of the TH approach.

Conclusion

LTA resections should be avoided in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the OGJ or gastric cardia. Registration number: NCT00149266 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

No survival benefit from a more extensive operation

Time-related changes in the prognostic significance of the total number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative pancreatic head cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of study was to assess time trends in the association between the total number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE) and survival in patients operated for adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas.

METHODS

Patients operated for node-negative adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas between 1988 and 2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2002 were compared to those diagnosed between 2003 and 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 3,406 patients were included. Although TNLE was associated with survival, the effect was not uniform. Compared to patients with >12 TNLE, survival decreased with lower TNLE (4-12 TNLE: hazard ratio [HR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.46; <4 TNLE: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.60) among patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2002. In contrast, for those diagnosed between 2003 and 2007, while there was decreased survival for those with <4 nodes (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.71), no effect was seen for patients with TNLE 4-12 (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.14).

CONCLUSION

The prognostic significance of the TNLE in patients operated for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas is not constant over time.

Survival benefit and safety of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy

This study was aimed to evaluate the survival benefit and safety of No. 10 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with total gastrectomy.Splenic hilar lymph nodes (LNs) are required to be dissected in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. However, there has still not been a consensus in aspects of survival and safety on No. 10 LN resection.From January 2006 to December 2011, 453 patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to No. 10 lymphadenectomy (10D+/10D-). Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between the 2 groups. These patients had undergone a follow-up until January 2014. The overall survival, morbidity, and mortality rate were analyzed. Subgroup analyses which were stratified by the sex, age, tumor location, lymphadenectomy extent, curative degree, differentiation, tumor size, and TNM staging (ie, stages of tumor) were performed.There were 220 patients in 10D+ group, whereas 233 in 10D- group. In terms of prognosis, the baseline features between the 2 groups were almost comparable. The incidence of No. 10 LN metastasis was 11.82%. There was no difference in morbidity and mortality between the 2 groups. Significantly more LNs were harvested from patients in 10D+ group (P = 0.000). The estimated overall 5-year survival rates were 46.44% and 37.43% in 10D+ group and 10D- group respectively, which is not statistically significant (P = 0.3288). Although no statistical significance was found in the estimated 5-year survival rate, these data were obviously higher in patients with age >60 years, Siewert II/ III tumors, N1 status, or IIIa/IIIc stages when No. 10 lymphadenectomies were performed.Although the differences were obvious, the 5-year survival rates between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significances, which was probably caused by too small patient samples. High-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed before stronger statement can be done. Until then, the No. 10 LNs' resection might be recommended in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy with an acceptable incidence of complications.

Systematic review of the surgical strategies of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction

INTRODUCTION

The optimal surgical treatment of patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction has not been established yet.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical strategies to treat adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.

METHODS

Databases Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for "adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction" AND ("surgery" OR "esophagectomy" OR "gastrectomy") or its synonyms or abbreviations. Only comparative studies that evaluated gastrectomy versus esophagectomy were included.

RESULTS

In total 10 cohort studies comparing esophagectomy versus gastrectomy fulfilled the quality criteria. The R0 resection rates varied between 72-93% for esophagectomy and 62%-93% for gastrectomy. Morbidity was 33-39% after esophagectomy versus 11-54% after gastrectomy. The 30-day mortality ranged between 1.0-2.3 after esophagectomy and 1.8-2.7% after gastrectomy. At 6 months after surgery, health-related quality of life was higher after total gastrectomy than after esophagectomy. The 5-year survival rates varied between 30-42% for esophagectomy and 18-38% for gastrectomy, but were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

No clear oncologic benefit of either esophagectomy or gastrectomy in patients with adenomacarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction could be observed. However, gastrectomy seems to be accompanied with better quality of life. Future research should preferably consist of a multicenter RCT comparing esophagectomy and gastrectomy for adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction.

Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction

BACKGROUND

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) may undergo either esophagectomy or gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of surgical therapy with regard to postoperative outcome and survival in patients with Siewert type II tumors.

METHODS

A prospective database of 266 consecutive patients with surgically resectable GEJ adenocarcinomas from 2003 to 2013 was analyzed. The surgical approach was based on preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

According to the histopathological analysis, 67 patients (25 %) had type I tumor, 176 patients (66 %) had type II tumor, and 16 patients (6 %) had type III tumor. In total, 86 % were treated with esophagectomy and 14 % with gastrectomy. Overall 5-year survival was 38 %. In type II patients, the type of operation did not significantly influence overall survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.606). A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) at the site of the esophagus was more common with gastrectomy (29 vs. 11 %; p = 0.025). No significant differences in mortality, morbidity, or disease recurrence were found. In patients with type II tumors, upper mediastinal nodal involvement (subcarinal, paratracheal, and aortapulmonary window) was found in 11 % of the patients. In 34 % of patients treated with esophagectomy, paraesophageal lymph nodes metastases were harvested compared with 5 % of patients treated with gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a type II GEJ adenocarcinoma, a positive CRM was more common with gastrectomy. Esophagectomy provides for a more complete para-esophageal lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, the high prevalence of mediastinal nodal involvement indicates that a full lymphadenectomy of these stations should be considered.

Surgical treatment of non-early gastric remnant carcinoma developing after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal surgical procedure for gastric remnant carcinoma (GRC) remains debatable. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the surgical treatments for T2-4 GRC developing after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between 1970 and 2012, a total of 50 patients underwent R0 resection for T2-4 GRC. The clinicopathologic features, therapeutic methods, and follow-up data of these patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

The tumor was located at a non-anastomotic site of the remnant stomach in 43 of the 50 patients. Total gastrectomy was performed in 48 patients and partial gastrectomy was in two patients. Lymph node metastasis was found in 19 patients. Major postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 50 patients were 90%, 66%, and 44%, respectively. Presence of small intestinal or esophageal infiltration and postoperative complications was independently associated with poorer survival. Dissection of the perigastric and splenic hilar/artery nodes was found to have potential therapeutic benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection for T2-4 GRC developing after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer can be invasive, but is feasible and effective. Total gastrectomy with splenectomy is one of the recommendable procedures for this disease.

Status and prognosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cardia cancer - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has a poor prognosis and survival rates significantly decreases if lymph node metastasis is present. An extensive lymphadenectomy may increase chances of cure, but may also lead to further postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the optimal treatment of cardia cancer remains controversial. A systematic review of English publications dealing with adenocarcinoma of the cardia was conducted to elucidate patterns of nodal spread and prognostic implications.

METHODS

A systematic literature search based on PRISMA guidelines identifying relevant studies describing lymph node metastasis and the associated prognosis. Lymph node stations were classified according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines.

RESULTS

The highest incidence of metastasis is seen in the nearest regional lymph nodes, station no. 1-3 and additionally in no. 7, 9 and 11. Correspondingly the best survival is seen when metastasis remain in the most locoregional nodes and survival equally tends to decrease as the metastasis become more distant. Furthermore, the presence of lymph node metastasis significantly correlates to the TNM-stage. Incidences of metastasis in mediastinal lymph nodes are associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

The best survival rates is seen when lymph node metastasis remains locoregional and survival rates decreases when distant lymph node metastasis is present. The dissection of locoregional lymph nodes offers significantly therapeutic benefit, but larger and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of dissecting distant and mediastinal lymph nodes.

Esophagogastric tube reconstruction with stapled pseudo-fornix in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a novel technique proposed for Siewert type II tumors

PURPOSE

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is increasing, but laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy is not widely accepted due to the absence of a standardized technique of reconstruction. This report describes a novel technique of esophagogastric tube reconstruction in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II tumors.

METHODS

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy, sometimes with transhiatal distal esophagectomy, was performed. After a perigastric, suprapancreatic, and lower thoracic paraesophageal lymphadenectomy, a gastric tube of 35-mm width was prepared. An esophagogastric tube anastomosis with pseudo-fornix was made with a no-knife linear stapler to prevent postoperative reflux esophagitis.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with Siewert type II tumors underwent this operation. They included six patients with early-stage cancer, six at high risk for transhiatal total gastrectomy due to several comorbidities, and three who needed palliative tumor resection. The mean operation time was 315 min. One postoperative anastomotic leak was treated conservatively, and three anastomotic stenoses were resolved with endoscopic balloon dilatation. Postoperative 1-year follow-up endoscopy revealed four cases of reflux esophagitis that were well controlled by medication.

CONCLUSIONS

This new technique of reconstruction was feasible. With the advantage of a gastric tube, a tension-free anastomosis was possible even for bulky tumors that needed lower esophagectomy. Although long-term follow-up and a larger number of patients are required to evaluate long-term functional outcomes and oncological adequacy, our procedure has the potential of becoming a treatment of choice for early-stage Siewert type II tumors and/or for some selected high-risk patients who need tumor resection.

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction differs between Siewert type II and Siewert type III patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been increasing worldwide. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with Siewert type II and III AEGs and clarified the optimal intra-abdominal lymph node dissection in these patients.

METHODS

This study included 132 patients with AEG who underwent curative resection at Shizuoka Cancer Center from September 2002 to December 2012. We used the index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD) to assess the efficacy of lymph node dissection of each station. The clinicopathological characteristics and IEBLDs of each station were compared between patients with Siewert type II and III AEGs.

RESULTS

We analyzed 92 patients with Siewert type II AEG and 40 patients with Siewert type III AEG. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was high in both groups (64.1 % in type II AEG and 75.0 % in type III AEG). The 5-year survival rates were similar for the patients with Siewert type II and III AEGs, at 54.0 and 53.4 %, respectively. The IEBLDs of stations located near the esophagogastric junction were generally high in both groups, while the IEBLDs of lower perigastric lymph nodes were higher in Siewert type III than in Siewert type II AEG cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The IEBLDs were similar between Siewert type II and III AEGs at all stations except for lower perigastric lymph nodes. Total gastrectomy should be selected as a standard treatment for Siewert type III AEG, whereas in Siewert type II AEG, preservation of the distal part of the stomach may be an acceptable procedure.

Optimal surgical management for esophagogastric junction carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Esophagogastric junction carcinoma incidence is increasing worldwide. However, surgical strategies for this cancer remain controversial. This study aimed to clarify the optimal surgical strategy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 68 consecutive patients with esophagogastric junction carcinoma [Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma (Nishi's definition): adenocarcinoma, N=53; squamous cell carcinoma, N=15] who underwent curative surgical resection at Keio University Hospital between January 2000 and September 2008.

RESULTS

In both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, most lymph node metastases were located in the lesser curvature area. Mediastinal lymph node metastasis was observed in 4 patients (7.5%) with adenocarcinoma and 7 patients (46.7%) with squamous cell carcinoma. No patient presented with lymph node metastases in the pyloric region. The therapeutic value of extended lymph node dissection was 0, except for lymph node station numbers 1, 2, 3, 4sa, 7, and 110. Extended lymph node dissection in the lesser curvature area showed a high therapeutic value. The para-aortic lymph node was the most frequent nodal recurrence site. All patients with tumor centers located below the esophagogastric junction (N=37) did not develop mediastinal lymph node metastasis or recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal gastrectomy through a transhiatal approach may be the optimal surgical strategy for esophagogastric carcinoma. Mediastinal lymph node dissection through a thoracic approach seems unnecessary, particularly when the tumor center is located below the esophagogastric junction. To confirm the necessity of para-aortic nodal dissection, further studies are required.

Surgical resection strategy and the influence of radicality on outcomes in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach to tumours of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction remains controversial. The principal randomized trial comparing transhiatal (THO) and transthoracic (TTO) oesophagectomy showed no survival difference, but suggested that some subgroups of patients may benefit from the more extended lymphadenectomy typically conducted with TTO.

METHODS

This was a cohort study based on two prospectively created databases. Short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing THO and TTO were compared. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, with secondary outcomes including time to recurrence and patterns of disease relapse. A Cox proportional hazards model provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.), with adjustments for age, tumour stage, tumour grade, response to chemotherapy and lymphovascular invasion.

RESULTS

Of 664 included patients (263 THO, 401 TTO), the distributions of age, sex and histological subtype were similar between the groups. In-hospital mortality (1·1 versus 3·2 per cent for THO and TTO respectively; P = 0·110) and in-hospital stay (14 versus 17 days respectively; P < 0·001) favoured THO. In the adjusted model, there was no difference in overall survival (HR 1·07, 95 per cent c.i. 0·84 to 1·36) or time to tumour recurrence (HR 0·99, 0·76 to 1·29) between the two operations. Local tumour recurrence patterns were similar (22·8 versus 24·4 per cent for THO and TTO respectively). No subgroup could be identified of patients who had benefited from more radical surgery on the basis of tumour location or stage.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in survival or tumour recurrence for TTO and THO.

Comparison of the surgical treatment strategies for Siewert type II squamous cell carcinoma in the same area as esophagogastric junction carcinoma: data from a single Japanese high-volume cancer center

Purpose

Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (ADC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) existing in the same area have distinct clinicopathological characteristics. The objective of this study was to examine differences in the surgical treatment and survival data, according to the histological subtype, in a single high-volume cancer center.

Methods

We retrospectively examined data from a total of 123 patients. Seventy-two patients with Siewert type II ADC and 51 patients with SCC in the same area.

Results

In terms of the clinicopathological factors, the SCC patients had more advanced stage disease and thoracotomy was more frequently performed than in the ADC patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates did not differ significantly between SCC and ADC, regardless of whether or not mediastinal, splenic hilum and para-aortic lymph node dissection was performed. Based on the calculated index for the frequency of nodal metastasis and the five-year OS rate for involvement at each level, only node nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 had a high index (>5) in both groups. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that only age (<65), the pN category and residual tumor classification were independently associated with the outcome.

Conclusions

Differences in the histological type of esophagogastric junction cancer were not independent prognostic factors for survival, and there appears to be a benefit to dissecting the number 1, 2, 3 and 7 lymph nodes.

New therapeutic strategies for squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma

This paper presents commentaries on neoadjuvant treatment esophagectomy; the prognostic and predictive effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the multimodality therapy of esophageal cancer; optimal preoperative treatment prior to surgery for esophageal cancer; a possible role for trastuzumab in treating esophageal adenocarcinoma or any esophageal dysplasia/intra-epithelial neoplasia; surgery after chemoradiation in resectable esophageal cancer; whether para-aortic lymph node dissection should be performed in esophagogastric junction (EGJ) tumors; and transhiatal esophagectomy in treatment of the esophageal cancer.

Lymph node metastasis in gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma in male patients

AIM: To reveal the clinicopathological features and risk factors for lymph node metastases in gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma of male patients.

METHODS: We retrospective reviewed a total of 146 male and female patients with gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma who had undergone curative gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in the Department of Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital and Rui Jin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical School between November 2001 and May 2012. Both the surgical procedure and extent of lymph node dissection were based on the recommendations of Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. Univariate and multivariate analyses of lymph node metastases and the clinicopathological features were undertaken.

RESULTS: The rate of lymph node metastases in male patients with gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma was 72.1%. Univariate analysis showed an obvious correlation between lymph node metastases and tumor size, gross appearance, differentiation, pathological tumor depth, and lymphatic invasion in male patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor differentiation and pathological tumor depth were the independent risk factors for lymph node metastases in male patients. There was an obvious relationship between lymph node metastases and tumor size, gross appearance, differentiation, pathological tumor depth, lymphatic invasion at pN₁ and pN₂, and nerve invasion at pN₃ in male patients. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological features or lymph node metastases between female and male patients.

CONCLUSION: Tumor differentiation and tumor depth were risk factors for lymph node metastases in male patients with gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma and should be considered when choosing surgery.

Value of splenectomy in patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been increasing recently in both Western and Eastern countries. However, an optimal treatment strategy for Siewert type II AEG is still unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the value of splenectomy in patients with Siewert type II AEG.

METHODS

From September 2002 to November 2011, 42 patients underwent total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for Siewert type II AEG and were included in this study. We used the index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD) to assess the efficacy of lymph node dissection of each station. Surgical complications were graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate of the 42 patients was 57.5 %. The incidence of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis was 4.8 % and the 5-year survival rate of patients with splenic hilar lymph node involvement was zero. Consequently, the IEBLD of splenic hilar lymph nodes was zero. Postoperative morbidities occurred in 25 patients (59.5 %). Pancreas-related complications were the most frequently observed (28.5 %), followed by intraabdominal abscess (14.3 %) and anastomotic leakage (9.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic hilar lymph node dissection may be omitted without decreasing curability in patients with Siewert type II AEG, although a prospective study is necessary for more conclusive results.

Priority of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to clarify the priority of nodal dissection in Siewert types II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

METHODS

The priority of nodal dissection was evaluated based on the therapeutic value index calculated by multiplying of the frequency of metastasis to each station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients (95 type II and 81 type III) were examined. Among the lymph nodes that had a metastatic incidence exceeding 10 %, the stations showing the first to fourth highest index were the paracardial and lesser curvature nodes (Nos. 1, 2, and 3) and the node at the root of the left gastric artery (No. 7) in the total cohort, as well as in each type. The next station was the lower thoracic paraesophageal lymph node (No. 110), followed by the nodes along the proximal splenic artery (No. 11p) in type II, whereas it was the nodes along the proximal splenic artery (No. 11p) followed by the para-aortic nodes (No. 16a2), the nodes at the celiac artery (No. 9), and the nodes around the splenic hilum (No. 10) in type III.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the highest priority nodal stations to be dissected were the paracardial and lesser curvature nodes (Nos. 1, 2, and 3) and the nodes at the root of the left gastric artery (No. 7), regardless of the Siewert subtype, but the subsequent priority was different depending on the subtype.

Cervical lymph node dissection for clinically submucosal carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to clarify the risk factors for supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis and the survival benefit from cervical lymph node (LN) dissections in patients with clinically submucosal (cT1b) carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with this disease who underwent esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify the independent risk factors for SCLN metastasis and prognostic factors, respectively. An index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at nodal basin and the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with metastasis at that basin were used to assess the therapeutic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (47%) were found to have pathological LN metastasis. Also, 13 patients (15%) had cervical LN metastasis: 6 and 7 with carcinoma of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus, respectively. SCLN metastasis was found in 6 patients (7%); however, there was no independent risk factor for SCLN metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate was 72.5%. Cervical LN metastasis was an independent prognostic factor (p = .04; odds ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.03-6.31); however, there was no significant difference in survival between patients with SCLN metastasis and those without (p = .06). The calculated index of estimated benefit from cervical LN dissections was 6.9, following upper mediastinal LN of 15.6 and perigastric LN of 8.3.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not identify risk factors to predict SCLN metastasis. Cervical LN dissection should not be omitted in patients with cT1b carcinoma, especially of the upper and mid-thoracic esophagus.

Treatment approaches to esophagogastric junction tumors

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinomas are usually classified into one of the three categories of the Siewert system. The clinicopathological features of EGJ adenocarcinomas vary according to this classification scheme. The lymphatic flow in EGJ tumors of any type is mainly toward the abdomen, and nodal metastasis to the upper or middle mediastinum from Siewert type II or III tumors is relatively uncommon. Thus, the transhiatal approach is regarded as the standard in surgery for Siewert type II or III tumors, while the transthoracic approach via a right thoracotomy is recommended for Siewert type I tumors. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is regarded as the standard treatment for resectable cancer of the EGJ in Western countries, but the necessity of adding radiation therapy to preoperative chemotherapy remains unknown. In the East, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard of care since the survival benefit was proven in pivotal randomized trials for stage II/III gastric cancer, including adenocarcinoma of the EGJ.

Pattern of abdominal nodal spread and optimal abdominal lymphadenectomy for advanced Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the cardia: results of a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether radical lymphadenectomy combined with total gastrectomy actually contributes to long-term survival for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the cardia. We identified the pattern of abdominal nodal spread in advanced type II adenocarcinoma and defined the optimal extent of abdominal lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients undergoing R0 total gastrectomy for advanced type II adenocarcinoma were identified from the gastric cancer database of 4,884 patients. Prognostic factors were investigated by multivariate analysis. The therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for each station was estimated by multiplying the incidence of metastasis by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive nodes in each station.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate was 37.1%. Age less than 65 years [hazard ratio, 0.455 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.261-0.793)] and nodal involvement with pN3 as referent [hazard ratio for pN0, 0.129 (95% CI, 0.048-0.344); for pN1, 0.209 (95% CI, 0.097-0.448); and for pN2, 0.376 (95% CI, 0.189-0.746)] were identified as significant prognosticators for longer survival. Perigastric nodes of the lower half of the stomach in positions 4d-6 were considered not beneficial to dissect, whereas there were substantial therapeutic benefits to dissecting the perigastric nodes of the upper half of the stomach in positions 1-3 and the second-tier nodes in positions 7 and 11.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited lymphadenectomy attained by proximal gastrectomy might suffice as an alternative to extended lymphadenectomy with total gastrectomy for obtaining potential therapeutic benefit in abdominal lymphadenectomy for advanced Siewert type II adenocarcinoma.

D3 Lymph Node Dissection in Right Hemicolectomy with a No-touch Isolation Technique in Patients With Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of lymph node dissection in the management of right-sided colon cancer remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical treatment of curable right-sided colon cancer by using D3 lymphadenectomy with a no-touch isolation technique and to determine the extent of lymph node dissection optimal for the prognosis of right-sided colon cancer.

DESIGN

This research is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected database.

SETTING

The investigation took place in a specialized colorectal surgery department.

PATIENTS

: Data on 370 consecutive patients who underwent D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided colon cancer with a no-touch isolation technique were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The survival of patients with involvement of main nodes at the roots of colonic arterial trunks along superior mesenteric vessels through intermediate nodes in the right mesocolon was determined.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival of patients with stage I (n = 73, 19.7%), II (n = 155, 41.9%), and III (n = 142, 38.4%) cancer were 94.5%, 87.6%, and 79.2%. The 5-year disease-specific survival of patients with stages I, II, and III cancer were 100.0%, 94.5%, and 85.0%. Eleven patients (3.0%) had metastatic involvement of main lymph nodes, whereas 49 (13.2%) had metastases to intermediate lymph nodes. The 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival of patients with metastases to main lymph nodes were 36.4% for both, and 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival of patients with metastases to intermediate lymph nodes were 77.6% and 83.5%.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its nonrandomized retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

D3 lymphadenectomy with a no-touch isolation technique allows curative resection and long-term survival in a cohort of patients with cancer of the right colon.