Surgeon age in relation to patients' long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Increasing surgeon age may influence patient outcomes after complex procedures due to gained experience but also decreased technical and cognitive abilities. This study aimed to clarify whether surgeon age influences patients' long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Population-based cohort study including all patients who underwent open and curatively intended gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2015 in Sweden, with follow-up throughout 2020. Surgeon age, categorized into three equal-sized groups (tertiles), was assessed in relation to 5-year all-cause mortality rate (main outcome) and 5-year disease-specific death (secondary outcome) using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for patient age, sex, education, co-morbidity, pathological tumour stage, tumour sublocation and neoadjuvant therapy. Lymph node yield, resection margin status, in-hospital complications and annual surgeon volume of gastrectomy were considered potential mediators.

RESULTS

Among 1647 patients, the 5-year all-cause mortality rate was increased for surgeon age ≥55 years (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% c.i. 1.04 to 1.41) and borderline elevated for age 47-54 years (HR 1.16, 95% c.i. 0.99 to 1.36), compared with age ≤46 years. Five-year disease-specific death was increased for surgeon age ≥55 years (HR 1.25, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 1.48) and 47-54 years (HR 1.22, 95% c.i. 1.02 to 1.44), compared with age ≤46 years. The associations attenuated and became statistically non-significant after adjustment for lymph node yield, resection margin status and complications.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon age ≥47 years might be associated with worse long-term survival in patients who undergo gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma, possibly mediated in part by differences in lymph node yield, resection margin status and complications.

Assessment of Laparoscopic Spleen-Preserving Hilar Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Without Invasion Into the Greater Curvature: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The survival benefit of laparoscopic total gastrectomy combined with spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (LSTG) for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) without invasion into the greater curvature remains uncertain.

Objective

To compare the long-term and short-term efficacy of LSTG (D2 + No. 10 group) and conventional laparoscopic total gastrectomy (D2 group) for patients with APGC that has not invaded the greater curvature.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this open-label, prospective randomized clinical trial, a total of 536 patients with clinical stage cT2 to 4a/N0 to 3/M0 APGC without invasion into the greater curvature were enrolled from January 2015 to October 2018. The final follow-up was on October 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022.

Interventions

Eligible patients were randomized to the D2 + No. 10 group or the D2 group.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes were 3-year overall survival (OS) and morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery.

Results

Of 526 included patients, 392 (74.5%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (9.6) years. A total of 263 patients were included in the D2 + No. 10 group, and 263 were included in the D2 group. The 3-year DFS was 70.3% (95% CI, 64.8-75.8) for the D2 + No. 10 group and 64.3% (95% CI, 58.4-70.2; P = .11) for the D2 group, and the 3-year OS in the D2 + No. 10 group was better than that in the D2 group (75.7% [95% CI, 70.6-80.8] vs 66.5% [95% CI, 60.8-72.2]; P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed that splenic hilar lymphadenectomy was not an independent protective factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.16) or OS (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.12). Stratification analysis showed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer in the D2 + No. 10 group had better 3-year DFS (92.9% vs 39.3%; P < .001) and OS (92.9% vs 42.9%; P < .001) than those in the D2 group. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients with advanced posterior gastric cancer could have the survival benefit from No. 10 lymph node dissection (DFS: HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02-0.46; OS: HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52).

Conclusions and Relevance

Although LSTG could not significantly improve the 3-year DFS of patients with APGC without invasion into the greater curvature, patients with APGC located posterior gastric wall may benefit from LSTG.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02333721.

Florid Foreign Body-type Giant Cell Response to Keratin Is Associated With Improved Overall Survival in Patients Receiving Preoperative Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

While most resection specimens from patients with neoadjuvantly treated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma show therapy-related changes in the form of inflammation and fibrosis, others harbor a florid foreign body-type giant cell response to keratin debris. The purpose of our study was to perform a detailed clinicopathologic analysis of these histologic types of treatment responses and correlate these findings with patient outcome. Clinical and pathologic parameters from 110 esophagogastrectomies were recorded and analyzed. Two main types of histologic responses were observed: inflammatory-predominant response (59%) and florid foreign body-type giant cell response to keratin (41%). Irrespective of cG, cTNM, and amount of residual cancer, florid foreign body-type giant cell reaction was predominantly noted deep within the esophageal wall, while the inflammatory response was restricted to the mucosa, submucosa, and inner half of muscularis propria. Patients with foreign body-type giant cell response showed significantly better overall survival compared with the inflammatory response group (log-rank test P=0.015). Florid foreign body-type giant cell response was the only factor associated with improved survival in a multivariable analysis for overall survival (hazard ratio=0.5; 95% confidence interval=0.3-1.0; P=0.038), but not in the model for disease-specific survival, whereas ypTNM stage II was the only significant risk factor for disease-specific survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio=3.4; 95% confidence interval=1.0-11.2; P=0.047). Our results suggest that in addition to the College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Score and ypTNM stage, subtype of histologic response to therapy may represent another prognostic marker for neoadjuvantly treated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is an additional option for locally advanced gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a retrospective control study

BACKGROUND

This study compared the long-term efficacy of different durations of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 428 patients with stage II-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy between 2009 and 2016. Patients were divided into four groups according to the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy, including 0 week (no adjuvant, group A), 20 to 24 weeks (completed 7-8 cycles every 3 weeks or 10-12 cycles every 2 weeks, group B), and 12 to18 weeks (completed 4-6 cycles every 3 weeks or 6-9 cycles every 2 weeks, group C), and less than 12 weeks (received up to 3 cycles every 3 weeks or 5 cycles every 2 weeks, group D). The chemotherapy regimens included XELOX, SOX, and FOLFOX. 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates for groups A, B, C, and D were 52.3, 73.7, 72.0, and 53.3%, respectively, and the 5-year DFS rates were 50.0, 68.0, 65.4, and 50.0%, respectively. OS and DFS were higher in group B than in groups A and D. Similarly, patients in group C were more likely to have higher OS and DFS than those in groups A and D. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between groups B and C. The multivariate analysis confirmed with high statistical significance the efficacy of complete courses of adjuvant chemotherapy, and, among them, the similar impact of 4-6/6-9 and 7-8/10-12 cycles, resulting in similar HRs vs Group A (0.52 and 0.42, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce toxicity and maintain efficacy, XELOX or SOX chemotherapy regimens administered for 4-6 cycles every 3 weeks or FOLFOX regimen for 6-9 cycles every 2 weeks might be a favorable option for patients with stage II-III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. Prospective multicenter clinical trials with adequate sample sizes are necessary to verify these findings.

Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization

BACKGROUND

The most commonly performed bariatric procedures are laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Impact of learning curves on operative outcome has been well shown, but the necessary learning curves have not been clearly defined. This study provides a systematic review of the literature and proposes a standardization of phases of learning curves for RYGB and LSG.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases. All studies specifying a number or range of approaches to characterize the learning curve for RYGB and LSG were selected.

RESULTS

A total of 28 publications related to learning curves for 27,770 performed bariatric surgeries were included. Parameters used to determine the learning curve were operative time, complications, conversions, length of stay, and blood loss. Learning curve range was 30-500 (RYGB) and 30-200 operations (LSG) according to different definitions and respective phases of learning curves. Learning phases described the number of procedures necessary to achieve predefined skill levels, such as competency, proficiency, and mastery.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitions of learning curves for bariatric surgery are heterogeneous. Introduction of the three skill phases competency, proficiency, and mastery is proposed to provide a standardized definition using multiple outcome variables to enable better comparison in the future. These levels are reached after 30-70, 70-150, and up to 500 RYGB, and after 30-50, 60-100, and 100-200 LSG. Training curricula, previous laparoscopic experience, and high procedure volume are hallmarks for successful outcomes during the learning curve.

Association of surgeon and hospital volume with postoperative mortality after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from 71,307 Japanese patients collected from a nationwide web-based data entry system

BACKGROUND

Despite interest in surgeon and hospital volume effects on total gastrectomy (TG), clinical significance has not been confirmed in a large-scale population. This study aimed at clarifying the association of surgeon and hospital volume on postoperative mortality after TG for gastric cancer among Japanese patients in National Clinical Database (NCD).

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, we retrospectively extracted data on TG for gastric cancer from the NCD. The primary outcome was operative mortality. We divided surgeon volume as the number of TGs performed by a patient's surgeon in the previous year: S1 (0-2 cases), S2 (3-9), S3 (10-25), S4 (26-79) and hospital volume by the number of TGs performed in the previous year: H1 (0-11 cases), H2 (12-26), H3 (27-146). We calculated the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mortality rate based on odds ratios (OR) estimated from a hierarchical logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We analyzed 71,307 patients at 2051 institutions. Low-volume surgeons and hospitals had significantly older and poorer-risk patients with various comorbidities. The operative mortality rate decreased with surgeon volume, 2.5% in S1 and 0.6% in S4. The operative mortality was 3.1% in H1, 1.7% in H2, and 1.2% in H3. After risk adjustment for surgeon, hospital volume and patient characteristics, hospital volume was significantly associated with operative morality (H3: OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate hospital volume has an impact on postoperative mortality after TG in a nationwide population study. These findings suggest centralization may improve outcomes after TG.

Prognostic value of hypocholesterolemia in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

According to previous studies, low serum total cholesterol (TC) is associated with higher cancer incidence and mortality. However, the prognostic implications of preoperative TC in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remain to be determined.

METHODS

A total of 1251 patients with GC, who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2005 and 2008, were recruited. Propensity score weighting (PSW) based on a generalized boosted method (GBM) was used to control for selection bias.

RESULTS

After balancing the preoperative and operative covariates, low TC was associated with high incidence of complications (severe complication rate: 15.2% (Low TC) vs. 4.7% (Normal TC) vs 5.5% (High TC); p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, lowering TC was associated with poor OS and RFS in weighted population. [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.867-0.980; P = 0.009 and RFS: HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.873-0.988; P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative TC is a useful predictor of postoperative survival and postoperative complications in patients with stage I-III GC and may help to identify high-risk patients for rational therapy, including nutritional support, and timely follow-up.

Intra-tumor metabolic heterogeneity of gastric cancer on 18F-FDG PETCT indicates patient survival outcomes

The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of intra-tumor metabolic heterogeneity on 2-[18F] Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for patients with gastric cancer. Fifty-five patients with advanced gastric cancer that had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery were included. Clinicopathological information, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before chemotherapy, pathological response, recurrence or metastasis, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the patients were collected. The maximum, peak, and mean standardized uptake values (SUV_max, SUV_peak, and SUV_mean), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on PET/CT were measured. Heterogeneity index-1 (HI-1) was calculated as SUV_mean divided by the standard deviation, and heterogeneity index-2 (HI-2) was evaluated through linear regressions of MTVs according to different SUV thresholds. Associations between these parameters and patient survival outcomes were analyzed. None of the parameters on PET were associated with tumor recurrence. Pathological responders had significantly smaller TLR, MTV and HI-2 values than non-responders (P = 0.017, 0.017 and 0.013, respectively). In multivariate analysis of PFS, only HI-2 was an independent factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.693, P = 0.005) after adjusting for clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. In multivariate analysis of OS, HI-2 was also an independent predictive factor (HR = 2.281, P = 0.009) after adjusting for tumor recurrence. Thus, HI-2 generated from baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is significantly associated with survival of patients with gastric cancer. Preoperative assessment of HI-2 by ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT might be promising to identify patients with poor prognosis.

Clinical significance of advanced lung cancer inflammation index, a nutritional and inflammation index, in gastric cancer patients after surgical resection: A propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has recently been shown as a prognostic marker for several cancers. However, its predictive value for surgical and oncological outcomes in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative ALI in 620 GC patients receiving gastrectomy to elucidate the prognostic value for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and to clarify its predictive value for perioperative risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in GC patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was also conducted to certify these potentials of preoperative ALI.

RESULTS

Preoperative low ALI was significantly correlated with advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage classification. Patients with low ALI showed poorer OS (p < 0.0001) and DFS (p < 0.0001) compared to those with high ALI, and multivariate analysis showed that decreased ALI was an independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratios of 1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.15-2.19, p = 0.006]. Meanwhile, preoperative low ALI was also an independent risk factor for overall SSI [odds ratio (OR) of 2.04, 95% CI of 1.24-3.35, p = 0.005] or organ-space SSI (OR of 2.69, 95% CI of 1.40-5.23, p = 0.003). We further conducted PSM analysis and verified all of these findings in the PSM cohort.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of preoperative ALI can identify patients with high risk of adverse perioperative and oncological outcomes in GC patients.

Improving survival of stage II-III primary gastric signet ring cell carcinoma by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

There is no consistent evidence about the appropriate treatment strategies for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) to improve prognosis. We conducted a population‐based study to examine the effects of combined modality therapies on survival outcomes using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data.

Methods

Analyses included stage II‐III primary GSRC patients who were diagnosed between 2006 and 2016. Therapies were categorized as gastrectomy group, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) group, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) group, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group. Survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models and subgrouped by gender, tumor site, stage at diagnosis, and number of lymph nodes removed.

Results

Of the 1717 cases of stage II‐III primary GSRC, the mean (SD) age was 59.6 (13.3) years, and over a half were male (52.8%). A total of 39.9% patients received adjuvant CRT and the 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 34.6%. The median OS of patients treated with adjuvant CRT was significantly longer than that of the gastrectomy group (33 months vs 24 months, aHR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.84). Although the crude model showed a significant association between adjuvant CT and total survival (cHR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.96), the effect measure turned null in the multivariable and sub‐group analysis. We did not find the significant effect of neoadjuvant RT.

Conclusions

In this study, GSRC patients with stage II‐III experienced improved overall survival after receiving adjuvant CRT, which provides several treatment implications. More clinical trials will be needed to verify the conclusion derived from this study.

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in very elderly patients: short-and long-term outcomes

PURPOSE

It remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is a suitable treatment for very elderly (VE) patients. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of LG for gastric cancer in VE patients.

METHODS

We reviewed 226 consecutive patients who underwent LG between January 2010 and December 2016. We compared VE patients (age ≥ 80, n = 38) with non-elderly patients (age ≤ 79, n = 188).

RESULTS

An ASA-PS score ≥ 2 was more common in VE group (86.8 vs. 48.9%; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the operating time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative morbidity between the groups. The 3-year survival rate and 3-year disease-specific survival rate were lower in the VE group (53.7 vs. 85.6%; P < 0.0001, 78.5 vs. 92.4%; P = 0.0116). A univariate analysis showed that PS scores ≥ 2, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and pN stage were independent predictors of decreased overall survival rates in the VE group. A multivariate analysis showed total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage to be independent predictors in the VE group.

CONCLUSION

LG for gastric cancer is, thus, considered to be safe for patients aged 80 years or older. Total gastrectomy, a Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4, and the pN stage were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in these patients.

Operative safety of curative gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer - 1:2 propensity score matching analysis: A retrospective single-center study (cohort study)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the operative safety and long-term outcomes of additional curative gastrectomy (ACG) after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as compared with standard gastrectomy (SG) without ESD in patients with early gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 101 patients receiving ACG after non-curative ESD (Post-ESD group) and 1080 patients after SG without ESD (Surgery-only group), between 2009 and 2016, were reviewed retrospectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were compared between groups, using propensity score matching analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, a total of 101 patients in the post-ESD group and 202 patients in the surgery-only group were analyzed. The post-ESD group had shorter operation times than did the surgery-only group (p = 0.005). Estimated blood loss and the incidence of postoperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups, and no differences were observed in pathologic outcomes, including N stage (p = 0.268). In addition, 5-year OS, DSS, and RFS rates were not significantly different between groups (OS; 95.1% vs. 98.2%, p = 0.535, DSS; 98.2% vs. 98.7%, p = 0.956, and RFS; 98.6% vs. 98.9%, p = 0.757, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ACG can be performed safely after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection, with good operative outcomes.

Propensity-score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional dataset to compare postoperative complications between Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Few well-controlled studies have compared postoperative complications between Billroth I (B-I) and Roux-en-Y (R-Y). The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of overall and severe postoperative complications by reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional dataset study of patients who underwent distal gastrectomy with B-I or R-Y reconstruction from 2010 to 2014. Using propensity scores to strictly balance the significant variables, we compared postoperative complications between the techniques.

RESULTS

After matching, we enrolled 1014 patients (n = 507 in each group). The incidence of postoperative complications in the R-Y group was significantly higher vs the B-I group (29% vs 17%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (4.3% vs 1.8%, P = 0.0177), bowel obstruction (2.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.0203), and delayed gastric emptying (5.3% vs 1.0%, P < 0.0001) in the R-Y group was significantly higher vs the B-I group, respectively; we saw no significant difference in leakage (3.4% vs 4.1%, P = 0.5084). The incidence of grade ≥ III severe postoperative complications in the R-Y group was significantly higher vs the B-I group (13% vs 7.1%, P = 0.0013). Multivariable analysis showed that R-Y reconstruction was a strong independent risk factor for overall postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.58, P = 0.0044) and grade ≥ III severe postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.75, P = 0.0127). A forest plot revealed that R-Y reconstruction was associated with a greater risk of both overall and grade ≥ III severe postoperative complications in any subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

R-Y reconstruction was associated with increasing overall postoperative complications, as well as severe postoperative complications.

Short- and long-term survival after laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a National database study

BACKGROUND

The use of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains controversial. Our objective was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) vs. open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric adenocarcinoma using a national cancer database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2014) was analyzed for total gastrectomy cases performed for gastric adenocarcinoma. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were stratified by stage and compared based on laparoscopic vs. open surgical approach. Primary outcome measures included 30-day and 90-day mortality and Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate long-term survival.

RESULTS

There were 2584 cases analyzed, including 592 (22.9%) stage I, 710 (27.5%) stage II, and 1282 (49.6%) stage III cases. The distribution of LTG vs. OTG cases was 156 (26.4%) vs. 436 (73.6%) for stage I, 163 (23.0%) vs. 547 (77.0%) for stage II, and 241 (18.8%) vs. 1041 (81.2%) for stage III. For all stages analyzed, there was no difference between laparoscopic vs. open approach for adjusted 30-day mortality (stage I: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.52, p = 0.75; stage II: AOR 1.36, p > 0.99; stage III: AOR 0.46, p = 0.29) or 90-day mortality (stage I: AOR 0.46, p = 0.99; stage II: AOR 1.17, p = 0.99; stage III: 0.57, p = 0.29). There was no difference between LTG vs. OTG 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves for any stage (stage I: p = 0.20; stage II: p = 0.83; stage III: p = 0.46). When compared to OTG, LTG had a similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (HR 0.89 p = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy and OTG have comparable 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and long-term survival.

The impact of negative lymph nodes in the survival outcomes of pN+ patients following radical gastrectomy: the inverse lymph node ratio as a better score to study negative lymph nodes

The impact of negative lymph nodes (LNs) on survival of pN+ patients has been recognized. The weight of negative LNs in an inverse lymph node ratio (nR) should be related to its prognostic impact. Five hundred and two consecutive gastric cancer patients, who underwent radical gastrectomy, were included. Patients were split into groups according to the number of harvested nodes and a cross-tabulation with pTNM stages was performed to test differences in the tumor burden. pN+ patients (n = 296) were split into groups of negative LNs harvested. We tested an alternative formula for computing a lymph node ratio: nR = total number of harvested nodes/total number of positive nodes. The median number of negative LNs was significantly different (p < 0.01) between dissection groups, but not the median of positive nodes (p > 0.05). No difference in pTNM percentage distribution was found between these groups (p > 0.05). When tested, the overall survival improved significantly for groups with larger numbers of negative LNs (p < 0.001). A cutoff of nR ≥ 6 was an independent prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.001), and the survival of pN+ patients with nR ≥ 6 was not different from pN0 patients. The impact of the number of negative LNs on the survival of the pN+ patients was demonstrated. The higher numbers in the numerator of the nR was due to the disproportion between harvested negative LNs and metastatic LNs. Larger ratios imply more negative lymph nodes in relation to positive lymph nodes, which was significantly associated with survival. We believe that the proposed nR is a friendlier to use format because of its intuitive interpretation.

Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO)

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between gastric cancer surgery case-volume and Textbook Outcome, a new composite quality measurement.

BACKGROUND

Textbook Outcome included (a) negative resection margin, (b) greater than 15 lymph nodes sampled, (c) no severe complication, (d) no re-intervention, (e) no unplanned ICU admission, (f) length of stay of 21 days or less, (g) no 30-day readmission and (h) no 30-day mortality following surgery.

METHODS

All patients undergoing gastrectomy for non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma registered in the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario between 2004 and 2015 were included. We used multivariable generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression modelling to estimate the association between gastrectomy volume (surgeon and hospital annual volumes) and Textbook Outcome. Volumes were considered as continuous variables and quintiles.

RESULTS

Textbook Outcome was achieved in 378 of 1660 patients (22.8%). The quality metrics least often achieved were inadequate lymph node sampling and presence of severe complications, which occurred in 46.1% and 31.7% of patients, respectively. Accounting for covariates and clustering, neither surgeon volume nor hospital volume were significantly associated with Textbook Outcome. However, hospital volume was associated with adequate lymphadenectomy and fewer unplanned ICU admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher case volume can impact certain measures of quality of care but may not address all care structures necessary for ideal Textbook recovery. Future quality improvement strategies should consider using case-mix adjusted Textbook Outcome rates as a surgical quality metric.

Prediction of postoperative mortality and morbidity in octogenarians with gastric cancer - Comparison of P-POSSUM, O-POSSUM, and E-POSSUM: A retrospective single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate various POSSUM scoring systems in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1262 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The subjects were stratified by age into <80 years old and ≥80 years old. To assess the predictability and efficacy of various POSSUM scores (POSSUM, P-POSSUM, O-POSSUM, and E-POSSUM), the observed-to-expected (O:E) ratio and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated and compared with actual postoperative morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 1262 patients, 75 were elderly (≥80 years old). The observed mortality rates were 0.5% (n = 6) in the whole cohort, and 4.0% (n = 3) in elderly patients. The predicted mortalities of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, E-POSSUM, and O-POSSUM for elderly patients were 13.2%, 5.3%, 5.7%, and 21.8%, respectively (O:E ratio = 0.3, 0.75, 0.7, and 0.18, respectively). P-POSSUM and E-POSSUM showed superior discriminatory power compared to POSSUM and O-POSSUM. In terms of morbidity, E-POSSUM showed better predictive capabilities than POSSUM in elderly patients (O:E ratio = 0.56 and 0.74, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

All POSSUM scoring systems tend to overestimate postoperative mortality and morbidity in gastric cancer patients. E-POSSUM and P-POSSUM provided a better prediction of mortality and morbidity after curative gastrectomy in elderly patients compared to other POSSUM scores.

Preoperative prealbumin levels on admission as an independent predictive factor in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

To explore the role of preoperative prealbumin levels in predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 989 gastric cancer patients in the Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Harbin Medical University who underwent gastrectomy were included in this retrospective study. The preoperative prealbumin level, clinicopathological data, and follow-up data were recorded. According to the maximum chi-square survival correlation value, the survival of patients with low preoperative prealbumin (<140 mg/L) and high preoperative prealbumin (≥140 mg/L) were compared using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

Based on the best cut-off value of 140 mg/L, we divided the patients into the lower prealbumin group (<140 mg/L) and the higher prealbumin group (≥140 mg/L). Compared with the higher prealbumin group, the lower prealbumin group were older and had larger tumor volumes, lower hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and more upper gastric cancer tumors. The univariate analysis showed that prealbumin and other clinicopathological factors, including age, hemoglobin, tumor size, macroscopic type, cell differentiation, liver metastasis, operation type, N stage, and T stage, were significant prognostic factors. The multivariable analysis showed that age, prealbumin, macroscopic type, location, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative prealbumin level was an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer. The preoperative prealbumin level can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and guide clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach is controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified patients with locally advanced signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach (cT3/4 and cN any) diagnosed from January 2012 to December 2017 by using the clinical Tumor-Node-Metastasis (cTNM) staging system. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce bias in patient selection. The histologic and prognostic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed. The overall survival rates were used as the outcome measure to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery-first treatment in the selected patients.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients eligible for this study, 36 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 108 received initial surgery after diagnosis. After adjustment by PSM, 36 pairs of patients were generated, and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, and cTNM stage, were similar between the two groups. The R0 resection rates were 88.9% and 86.1% in the surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups after PSM, respectively (P = 1.000). The median follow-up period was 46.4 mo. The 5-year overall survival rates of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery-first group were 50.0% and 65.0% (P = 0.235), respectively, before PSM and 50% and 64.7% (P = 0.192), respectively, after PSM. Multivariate analyses conducted before and after PSM showed that NAC was not a prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides no survival benefit in patients with locally advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma. For resectable gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, upfront surgery should be the primary therapy.

Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in Patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²

Obesity is a major health issue in the modern world population and a risk factor for surgical procedures. This study examined perioperative and oncologic results of gastrectomy in obese patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. BMI ≥30 kg/m² was used to designate obesity. Five hundred and one patients were operated throughout the study period (2009-2018). The outcomes in obese patients (n = 205) were compared with those with normal weight (n = 171) and overweight (n = 125). The mean BMI was significantly different between the groups: 21.9 versus 26.7 versus 33.3 kg/m² (P < 0.01), respectively. Obesity was associated with higher incidence of comorbidities, longer operative time, and increased blood loss. Postoperative and short-term oncologic outcomes were similar. Median follow-up was 24 months with similar recurrence rates in the three groups. Median survival was comparable between the normal weight, overweight, and obese patients-36 (27-45) versus 42 (30-53) versus 32 (17-47) months, respectively (P = 0.63). Obesity itself does not deteriorate the surgical outcomes of gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Although technically demanding in obese patients, adequate lymph node yield and satisfactory long-term oncologic outcomes can be achieved in this group.

An examination of surgical and survival outcomes in the elderly (65-79 years of age) and the very elderly (≥80 years of age) who received surgery for gastric cancer

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine surgical and survival outcomes in the elderly (65-79 years of age) and the very elderly (≥80 years of age) who received surgery for gastric cancer.Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the records of patients ≥65 years old who received a gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were extracted from the medical records. Patients were divided into two groups: those 65-79 years of age and those ≥80 years of age. Data and survival outcomes were compared between the groups.Results: Sixty-four patients were included, 32 males and 32 females. The mean age in the 65-79 years old group was 73.4 ± 4.5 years, and in the ≥80 years group was 85.2 ± 3.4 years (p < .001). Three patients in the older group had chronic kidney disease, as compared to none in the 65-79 years group (p = .04); all other demographic, clinical, tumor, and surgical characteristics were similar between the groups, except for surgical time (all, p > .05). Patients ≥80 years had a higher incidence of pulmonary complications (24% vs 4.7%, p = .03), but there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality. The ≥80 years group had a higher overall survival, but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (42.9% and 34.9%, p = .224).Conclusions: Curative intent resection, gastrectomy with D1+/D2 lymph node dissection is a viable option for elders ≥80 years old with gastric carcinoma.

A comparative study on endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of early gastric carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy (LARG) in the treatment of early gastric carcinoma (EGC) with different risks of lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 194 EGC patients who underwent ESD (ESD group, n=58) or LARG (LARG group, n=136) in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were collected. The baseline data, pathological features of tumor, perioperative indexes and long- and short-term complications were compared between the two groups, the overall survival (OS) rate of patients was recorded through follow-up, and the tumor-free survival (TFS) rate was compared after ESD and LARG for EGC with different risks of lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

The general clinical features were comparable between the two groups of patients, and there was no perioperative death. The pathological features of the tumor had no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). The operation time in ESD group (73.57±21.30 min) was significantly shorter than that in LARG group (159.22±39.40 min) (p<0.001), and the time of first ambulation after operation in ESD group (1.6±0.8 d) was also overtly shorter than that in LARG group (3.5±1.7 d) (p<0.001). Postoperatively, no drainage tube was placed in the ESD group, while it was placed for 5.7±2.4 days on average in the LARG group. The time of first flatus after operation, time of first liquid diet after operation, and total hospitalization time in the ESD group were significantly compared with the LARG group (p<0.001). The incidence rate of short-term complications after surgery was 10.3% and 7.4% in the two groups, (p=0.570), while long-term complications were 17.6% (9/51) and 20.9% (24/115) in the two groups (p=0.631). The in situ tumor recurrence by the end of follow-up was 3.92% (2/51) and 0.87% (1/115) in the two groups, while the ectopic recurrence rate was 5.89% (3/51) and 0.87% (1/115) (p=0.173, p=0.087). OS survival was 96.1% (49/51) and 97.4% (112/115) in the two groups (p=0.751). The postoperative TFS of EGC patients with a low risk of lymph node metastasis was 93.8% (30/32) and 98.6% (70/71) in the two groups, again without significant difference (p=0.197). The postoperative TFS of EGC patients with a high risk of lymph node metastasis was 84.2% (16/19) and 97.7% (43/44) in the two groups, with statistically significant difference (log-rank, p=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

ESD is characterized by small trauma, rapid postoperative recovery, postoperative recurrence and survival comparable to those after surgical operation and high safety for EGC with a low risk of lymph node metastasis. LARG can reduce the postoperative recurrence rate of EGC in patients with high risk of lymph node metastasis.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy or Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: An MBSAQIP Analysis

In patients undergoing bariatric surgery, the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) contributes to perioperative morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the utilization and outcome of severely obese patients with MetS who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Using the 2015 and 2016 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, data were obtained for patients with MetS undergoing LSG or LRYGB. There were 29,588 MetS patients (LSG: 58.7% vs LRYGB: 41.3%). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (0.1% for LSG vs 0.2% for LRYGB, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.58, confidence interval (CI) 0.32-1.05, P = 0.07) or length of stay between groups (2 ± 2 for LSG vs 2.2 ± 2 days for LRYGB, P = 0.40). Compared with LRYGB, LSG was associated with significantly shorter operative time (78 ± 39 vs 122 ± 54 minutes, P < 0.01), lower overall morbidity (2.3% vs 4.4%, AOR 0.53, CI 0.46-0.60, P < 0.01), lower serious morbidity (1.5% vs 2.3%, AOR 0.64, CI 0.53-0.76, P < 0.01), lower 30-day reoperation (1.2% vs 2.3%, AOR 0.52, CI 0.43-0.63, P < 0.01), and lower 30-day readmission (4.2% vs 6.6%, AOR 0.62, CI 0.55-0.69, P < 0.01). In conclusion, LSG is the predominant operation being performed for severely obese patients with MetS, and its popularity may in part be related to its improved perioperative safety profile.

Current role of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery

Gastric cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide with increased associated morbidity and mortality. Although a multimodality treatment approach is necessary, surgery is still considered as the standard of care. There is a longstanding intercontinental debate between Eastern and Western upper GI surgeons in regards to the proper type of lymphadenectomy that should accompany the resection of the primary tumor. While D2 gastrectomy was performed as the standard procedure in eastern countries, the increased morbidity and mortality attributed initially to the D2 lymphadenectomy by the Medical Research Council (MRC), the Dutch and the Italian randomized control trial without respective survival benefits had led Western surgeons towards a more limited lymphadenectomy. Only 15 years after the conclusion of its accrual, the Dutch trial reported a significant decrease in recurrence rate after D2 procedure and attributed the D2-associated morbidity and mortality to the spleno-pancreatectomy that was routinely performed in the D2 arm of the study. As the D2 lymphadenectomy can be safely and adequately performed while preserving the spleen and/or the pancreas, it has been suggested as the recommended procedure for patients with resectable gastric cancer.

BEST: Bypass equipoise sleeve trial; rationale and design of a randomized, registry-based, multicenter trial comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is a well-documented surgical intervention for severe obesity. Recently, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained increased popularity. Short-term follow-up in limited-sized randomized trials comparing LGBP and LSG show no major differences in weight-loss, adverse events, or effect on comorbidities; however, there is a lack of sufficiently powered, pragmatic, randomized controlled trials comparing the mid- and long-term results of the two methods.

METHOD

BEST is a randomized, registry-based, multicenter trial comparing LGBP and LSG. The trial has two primary outcomes; rates of substantial complications (SC) and total body weight loss. We hypothesize that patients treated with LSG will experience 35% fewer substantial complications during the 5-year follow-up compared to patients treated with LGBP, and that the efficacy of LSG will remain within a non-inferiority margin of 5% in terms of weight loss. Our sample size calculation, using data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg), shows a power of 80% for SC and > 95% for weight loss at p < .025 with a total of 2100 included patients. The design of the trial will also enable comparisons within several relevant patient subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

As a large-sized, pragmatic, randomized trial, BEST will provide robust data comparing LGBP with LSG by generating long-term results on weight loss and SC's, as well as secondary outcomes and comparisons within patient subgroups. The use of a well-established registry for registration of all data facilitates a large multicenter trial, and combines the strengths of registry studies with those of a randomized trial. Clinical Trials registry: NCT02767505.

Bariatric surgery in the elderly: outcomes analysis of patients over 70 using the ACS-NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery offers patients with morbid obesity and related diseases short- and long-term benefits to their health and quality of life. Evidence-based medicine is integral in the evaluation of risk versus benefit; however, data are lacking for several high-risk patient populations, including the elderly.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed morbidity and mortality data for patients age ≥70 undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

SETTING

University Hospital, Bronx, New York, United States using national database.

METHODS

We used the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database for years 2005-2016 and identified patients who underwent primary SG or RYGB. Patients age ≥70 were assigned to the over age 70 (AGE70+) cohort and younger patients were assigned to the under age 70 (U70) cohort. Postoperative length of stay and 30-day morbidity and mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1498 patients age ≥70 underwent nonrevisional bariatric surgery, including 751 (50.1%) SG and 747 (49.9%) RYGB. AGE70+ was associated with increased mortality and increased rates of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and cerebrovascular morbidity. AGE70+ patients had longer mean length of stay, and were more likely to require transfusion and return to operative room. When stratified by procedure, rates of organ-space surgical site infection, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis/thrombophlebitis, and septic shock were significantly increased in AGE70+ patients undergoing RYGB but not SG. Impaired functional status was associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality for AGE70+ patients and for U70 patients, although the small number of patients within each category limited statistical analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of risk versus benefit is performed on a case-by-case basis, but evidence-based medicine is critical in empowering surgeons and patients to make informed decisions. The overall rate of morbidity and mortality for AGE70+ patients undergoing bariatric surgery was increased relative to U70 patients. Rates of several adverse events, including acute renal failure and myocardial infarction, were increased in AGE70+ patients undergoing RYGB but not SG, suggesting that SG may be the preferred procedure for elderly patients with organ-specific risk factors. The increased rates of morbidity and mortality observed for patients with impaired functional status supports consideration of functional status when evaluating preoperative risk.

Morbidity and Mortality of Total Gastrectomy: a Comprehensive Analysis of 90-Day Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Total gastrectomy (TG) is a complex procedure that carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality and in which patients may experience post-operative sequelae well past the standard 30-day follow-up period. Large studies from high-volume centers with detailed 90-day follow-up data are needed to provide benchmarks for high-quality care for this complex procedure.

METHODS

Single-institution, retrospective review of a comprehensive gastric cancer database of 148 patients undergoing curative intent TG from 2000 to 2017. Clinicopathologic and treatment factors were analyzed for their impact on 90-day outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 66 years, and 61% were male. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy were delivered to 32% and 11% of patients, respectively. Open and laparoscopic TG were performed in 93% (n = 137) and 7% (n = 11) of patients, respectively. Extended lymphadenectomy, pancreatectomy, and splenectomy were performed in 37%, 4.7%, and 19% of patients, respectively. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2.0% and 3.4%, respectively. At least one 90-day complication was experienced by 43.9% (n = 65) of patients, and 14% (n = 21) experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or 4 complication. Anastomotic leak occurred in 5.4% (n = 8) of patients, half of which required an invasive intervention. Median length of stay was 8 days. The readmission rate was 22%, and most readmissions were due to dehydration and/or nutritional compromise.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defines 30- and 90-day post-operative outcomes after total gastrectomy in a high-volume center. These outcomes data are critical to the improvement of the informed consent process and as benchmarks for future quality improvement initiatives.

[Comparison of safety and efficacy between proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy for upper third gastric cancer: a Meta-analysis]

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy between proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy and to ascertain the optimized procedure for patients with upper third gastric cancer through meta-analysis. Methods: The English literatures about proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy for upper third gastric cancer were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science database and then collected. The quality of enrolled studies was independently assessed by two researchers according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for retrospective studies and Jadad scale for RCT studies. The basic information of the literature and related clinical indicators were extracted. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival rate and recurrence rate. The secondary endpoints were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, morbidity of postoperative complication, incidence of anastomotic stenosis and incidence of reflux esophagitis. Considering the influence of tumor staging on postoperative clinicopathological features and prognosis, a subgroup analysis was performed on the literatures including cases of early gastric cancer and those including cases of tumor stage I to IV. Statistical analyses were carried out by the "metafor" and "meta" software packages from RevMan 5.3 software and R software (V3.2.4). Results: Twenty-five literatures involving 3667 patients (proximal gastrectomy for 1483, total gastrectomy for 2184) were finally enrolled for analysis, including 24 retrospective studies with ≥ 5 points and 1 RCT with 3 points, and all the literatures were of high quality. A total of 2516 cases of early gastric cancer were enrolled in 18 articles, including 1027 with proximal gastrectomy and 1489 with total gastrectomy. A total of 1151 cases with stage I to IV were enrolled in 7 articles, including 456 in proximal gastrectomy group and 695 in total gastrectomy group. Five-year survival rate was not significantly different for patients with early gastric cancer between the proximal gastrectomy group and total gastrectomy group (OR=1.16, 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.86, P=0.54). Similarly, there was no significant difference for patients with stage I to IV between the proximal gastrectomy group and the total gastrectomy group (OR=1.19, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.53, P=0.18). Recurrence rate of early gastric cancer patients was not significantly different between the proximal gastrectomy group and the total gastrectomy group (OR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.05 to 3.16, P=0.39).However, the recurrence rate of the proximal gastrectomy group was higher than that of the total gastrectomy group in patients with stage I to IV (OR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.19, P<0.01), whose difference was statistically significant. There was no significant differences in postoperative complication between the groups, both in patients with early gastric cancer, and in those with stage I to IV (both P>0.05). The incidences of postoperative anastomotic stenosis (OR=3.57, 95% CI: 1.82 to 6.99, P<0.01) and reflux esophagitis (OR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.23 to 6.54, P=0.01) in the proximal gastrectomy group were significantly higher than those in the total gastrectomy group in patients with early gastric cancer. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in long-term survival outcomes between total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric tumors. However,incidence of anastomotic stenosis and reflux esophagitis, and tumor recurrence rate after total gastrectomy are significantly lower. The total gastrectomy is recommended as the first choice for advanced upper gastric tumor.

Feasibility of robotic radical gastrectomy using a monopolar device for gastric cancer

PURPOSES

Laparoscopic gastrectomy using ultrasonic devices occasionally causes postoperative pancreatic fistula. Robotic gastrectomy using monopolar scissors may reduce intraoperative injury to the pancreas. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of robotic gastrectomy.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective study was conducted to evaluate the surgical outcomes of robotic gastrectomy. The primary endpoints were the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications and operative mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients were enrolled. The clinical T stages were T1 in 68 patients and T2 or higher in 47 patients. The types of surgery included distal gastrectomy (n = 72), total gastrectomy (n = 39), and proximal gastrectomy (n = 4). Two patients developed intraoperative complications (1.7%), but no cases required conversion to open surgery. The amylase concentration in drainage fluid was higher in cases with pancreatic compression, especially in those with compression for longer than 20 min. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II occurred in 11 patients (9.6%). There was no mortality. A multivariate analysis indicated that a high body mass index and pancreatic compression by an assistant for longer than 20 min were independent risk factors for postoperative complications (P = 0.029 and P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic gastrectomy using monopolar scissors is safe and feasible. Robotic dissection without compression of the pancreas may reduce postoperative complications.

Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is considered a technically demanding procedure with safety issues, it has been performed in several hospitals in Japan. Data from a nationwide web-based data entry system for surgical procedures (NCD) that started enrollment in 2011 are now available for analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 32,144 patients who underwent total gastrectomy and were registered in the NCD database between January 2012 and December 2013. Mortality and morbidities were compared between patients who received LTG and those who underwent open total gastrectomy (OTG) in the propensity score-matched Stage I cohort and Stage II-IV cohort.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mortality rate between LTG and OTG in both cohorts. Operating time was significantly longer in LTG while the blood loss was smaller. In the Stage I cohort, LTG, performed in 33.6% of the patients, was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay but significantly higher incidence of readmission, reoperation, and anastomotic leakage (5.4% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). In the Stage II-IV cohort, LTG was performed in only 8.8% of the patients and was associated with significantly higher incidence of leakage (5.7% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.02) although the hospital stay was shorter (15 days vs. 17 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LTG was more discreetly introduced than distal gastrectomy, but remained a technically demanding procedure as of 2013. This procedure should be performed only among the well-trained and informed laparoscopic team.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: a 10-year experience in a high-volume university hospital

OBJECTIVES

Surgery remains the cornerstone treatment modality for gastric cancer, the fifth most common type of tumor in Brazil. The aim of this study was to analyze the surgical treatment outcomes of patients with gastric cancer who were referred to a high-volume university hospital.

METHODS

We reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent any surgical procedure due to gastric cancer from a prospectively collected database. Clinicopathological characteristics, surgical and survival outcomes were evaluated, with emphasis on patients treated with curative intent.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2017, 934 patients with gastric tumors underwent surgical procedures in our center. Gastric adenocarcinoma accounted for the majority of cases. Of the 875 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, resection with curative intent was performed in 63.5%, and palliative treatment was performed in 22.4%. The postoperative surgical mortality rate for resected cases was 5.3% and was related to D1 lymphadenectomy and the presence of comorbidities. Analysis of patients treated with curative intent showed that resection extent, pT category, pN category and final pTNM stage were related to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The DFS rates for D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy were similar, but D2 lymphadenectomy significantly improved the OS rate. Additionally, clinical factors and the presence of comorbidities had influence on the OS.

CONCLUSIONS

TNM stage and the type of lymphadenectomy were independent factors related to prognosis. Early diagnosis should be sought to offer the optimal surgical approach in patients with less-advanced disease.

Relationship between the Body Mass Index and Tumor Site Postoperative Complications and Prognosis in Gastric Adenocarcinoma

The impact of BMI on survival in gastric cancer (GC) is not clear. We sought to explore the relationship between BMI and tumor site, clinicopathologic characteristics, postoperative complications, and prognosis in GC patients. Patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC between January 2011 and June 2016 formed the study cohort (n = 827). Patients were divided into three groups according to the BMI (in kg/m²): "low" (<18.5), "normal" (18.5-24.9), and "high" (≥25.0). The preoperative level of albumin and hemoglobin in the low BMI group was lower than that in the high BMI or normal BMI group (P < 0.05). The prevalence of gastric-cardia cancer in the high BMI group was significantly higher than that in the low BMI group (P = 0.001). The prevalence of gastric-antrum cancer in the high BMI group was significantly lower than that in the low BMI group (P = 0.001) and the normal BMI group (P = 0.004). The BMI of patients with gastric-cardia cancer was significantly higher than that of patients with gastric-body cancer (P = 0.018) and gastric-antrum cancer (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of tumor size, TNM stage, depth of tumor invasion, degree of tumor differentiation, resection margin, lymph node metastasis, or postoperative complications. BMI was not an independent factor that influenced the prognosis. We found a relationship between BMI and GC site. A low BMI may be associated with a poor prognosis and a high BMI may be related to a favorable prognosis. BMI was not an independent factor that influenced GC prognosis.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium After Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients

PURPOSE

The incidence of postoperative delirium is reported to range from 9 to 87%; however, no report has focused on cases of postoperative delirium in gastric cancer surgery alone. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of and risk factors for postoperative delirium after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1037 patients who underwent surgery were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups-those with (delirium group) or without (non-delirium group) postoperative delirium-and their backgrounds were compared. The short-term outcomes and the overall survival were also investigated.

RESULTS

Postoperative delirium was observed in 47 of 1037 patients (4.5%). A multivariate analysis revealed that male gender, age ≥ 75 years, a history of cerebrovascular disease, and the habitual use of sleeping pills were independent predictive factors for postoperative delirium. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the postoperative delirium group than in the non-delirium group. Postoperative delirium was significantly associated with postoperative complications. The 3-year overall survival was 74.3% in the delirium group and 85.5% in the non-delirium group (log-rank p = 0.006). A multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative delirium was an independent prognostic factor, along with the age and cancer stage.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of postoperative delirium was 4.5% in gastric cancer patients. Male gender, age ≥ 75 years, a history of cerebrovascular disease, and the habitual use of narcoleptic agents were risk factors for postoperative delirium after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Postoperative delirium was strongly associated with other postoperative complications and a poor survival after surgery.

Clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with upper third gastric cancer following radical surgical treatment: A retrospective cohort study

The incidences of upper third gastric cancer (UTGC) have been increasing. However, the prognostic factors for UTGC following radical surgical treatment remains largely unknown. This study was to investigate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), lymph node metastasis and recurrence of UTGC.Clinicopathologic data of 126 UTGC patients who underwent radical surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed. OS and univariate analysis were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the significance of the difference between curves was calculated with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to perform multivariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the prognostic accuracy.The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS for patients with UTGC were 81%, 47.6%, and 38.6% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor size (P = .019), tumor invasion depth (P < .001), and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) were the risk factors for 5-year OS. Multivariate analysis identified tumor invasion depth (P < .001) and lymph node metastasis (P < .001) as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. In addition, ROC curve analysis showed that tumor invasion depth (P = .017) or lymph node metastasis (P = .001) alone showed significantly effective prognosis for the 5-year OS in patients with UTGC. For UTGC patients with lymph node metastasis, tumor size (P = .023), lym embolism (P = .003), tumor invasion depth (P = .002), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .004) were the risk factors for the 5-year OS. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (P = .048), lym embolism (P = .032), tumor invasion depth (P = .004), and invasion of tunica serosa (P = .031) as independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS. For UTGC patients with distant metastasis or tumor recurrence, univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumor invasion depth and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS.The results suggested that for UPGC patients undergoing the radical surgical treatment, tumor invasion depth and/or lymph node metastasis are the independent prognostic factors for the 5-year OS, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and tumor recurrence.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly Population

There have been limited data on the safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in the elderly. To compare outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between elderly (≥65 years) and nonelderly (18-64 years) patients. Using the 2011 to 2015 NSQIP database, we analyzed severely obese patients who underwent LRYGB or LSG. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess primary outcomes including 30-day mortality, serious morbidity, length of stay, and readmission. There were 41,475 LRYGB cases performed, including 2,010 (4.8%) cases in elderly patients. Compared with the nonelderly, elderly patients who underwent LRYGB had higher serious morbidity [odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-1.76, P = 0.001], but similar 30-day mortality (OR = 0.8, CI = 0.28-2.34, P = 0.688). There were 44,550 LSG cases performed, including 2,055 (4.6%) cases in elderly patients. Compared with the nonelderly, elderly patients who underwent LSG had significantly higher serious morbidity (OR = 1.44, CI = 1.12-1.84, P = 0.005) and higher 30-day mortality (OR = 3.62, CI = 1.34-9.83, P = 0.011). Laparoscopic bariatric surgery is safe in the elderly population, and is similar between bariatric procedures. However, elderly patients have higher serious morbidity; therefore, they should be counseled regarding their higher risk, but should not be denied bariatric surgery based solely on their age.

Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes including postoperative complications and prognosis between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for proximal gastric cancer (GC). Propensity-score-matching analysis was performed to overcome patient selection bias between the two surgical techniques.

METHODS

Among 457 patients who were diagnosed with GC between January 1990 and December 2010 from four Italian institutions, 91 underwent PG and 366 underwent TG. Clinicopathologic features, postoperative complications, and survivals were reviewed and compared between these two groups retrospectively.

RESULTS

After propensity-score matching had been done, 150 patients (75 TG patients, 75 PG patients) were included in the analysis. The PG group had smaller tumors, shorter resection margins, and smaller numbers of retrieved lymph nodes than the TG group. N stages and 5-year survival rates were similar after TG and PG. Postoperative complication rates after PG and TG were 25.3 and 28%, respectively, (P = 0.084). Rates of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture were 12 and 6.6% after PG and 2.6 and 1.3% after TG, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). 5-year overall survival for PG and TG group was 56.7 and 46.5%, respectively (P = 0.07). Survival rates according to the tumor stage were not different between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that type of resection was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Although PG for upper third GC showed good results in terms of survival, it is associated with an increased mortality rate and a higher risk of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture.

Differences in gastric cancer surgery outcome between East and West: differences in surgery or different diseases?

The Dutch D1D2 Trial revealed a noncompliance rate of 51% in gastric cancer patients who should have undergone a D2 dissection, while it disclosed that the D2 lymph node dissection group of patients exhibited a higher 15-year overall survival (OS) rate, lower rates of local and regional recurrence, lower rates of liver metastases and lower cancer-related death rates compared to the D1 group, implying that the surgical technique per se may influence outcomes. On the other hand, the predominant up-regulation of invasive and metastatic genes in the Western tumor libraries, the differences in the criteria used for gastric cancer diagnosis in the East and the steady fnding that the Asian ethnicity is a favorable prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer treated in the US, have been proposed as possible explanations for the differences observed in the gastric cancer outcome between the East and the West. Moreover, literature addresses that gastric cancers in the East are mainly diagnosed at younger ages, they are of intestinal type, located distally, diagnosed at an early stage of disease, while gastric cancers in the West are mainly affecting elderly patients with comorbidities, they are of diffuse type, located proximally, and diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease. Future discoveries in genetics and molecular biology may clarify the characteristics of each tumor, while future achievements in imaging modalities and biological or target therapies may establish "personalized" therapies. Until that time, all efforts for improving our surgical techniques and optimizing the perioperative care are mandatory.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) After R0 Gastrectomy for Cancer

PURPOSE

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients undergoing potentially curative gastrectomy for cancer (GC).

METHODS

Thomson Reuters Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE(R) and PUBMED databases were searched for relevant articles using search terms neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), GC and survival. Articles reporting overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival (DFS), in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy, were studied.

RESULTS

Articles numbering 365 were identified during the preliminary search, and 10 containing 4164 patients were included in the final review. Most patients were > 60 years of age, male (67%) and 2239 (53.8%) had pT3 disease. The number of NLR dichotomization thresholds reported numbered 7, with 2.00 and 3.00 (n = 2) the most common. NLR was associated with poor survival in eight studies with hazard ratios ranging from 1.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.89) to 2.99 (1.99-4.49). Pooled odds ratio (OR) for OS was 2.31 (1.40-3.83, p = 0.001) and for DFS 2.72 (1.14-6.54, p = 0.020). Four studies presented T-stage data, OR 1.62 (1.33-1.96, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

NLR is an important prognostic indicator associated with both OS and DFS after R0 resection of GC, but the critical level is equivocal.

Prediction of three lipid derivatives for postoperative gastric cancer mortality: the Fujian prospective investigation of cancer (FIESTA) study

BACKGROUND

As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR.

METHODS

Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015.

RESULTS

Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.

Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma

SCOPE

neoadjuvant RCT influence on early and long term postoperative outcomes in patients with locally advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Sixty two patients with locally advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas were treated at the Center of Excellence in Esophageal Surgery at St. Mary Hospital between 2010-2017. According to the Siewert classification, the group comprised of type I - 11 patients, type II - 18 patients and type III - 33 patients. Only 17 patients received preoperative RCT. The surgical treatment for the 62 resected patients was: abdominal extended gastrectomy - 40 patients, Ivor-Lewis - 13 patients, McKeown esophagogastrectomy (3 incisions) - 5 patients and transhiatal esophagectomy - 4 patients. Results: Postoperative morbidity was 46.77% and was mainly represented by fistulas in 17 patients and pulmonary complications such as pleurisy,pneumonia and ARDS in 12 patients. Fistula occurred in 15 cases: grade 1 - 2 patients, grade 2 - 10 patients, grade 3 - 5 patients. Postoperative mortality was 4.8% (p_value = 0.017980 Fisher's Exact Test). Downstaging was observed in 7 patients. I did not encounter statistically significant differences in long term survival. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant RCT had no impact on postoperative morbidity, but statistically influenced postoperative mortality.

Establishing a Reproducible Murine Animal Model of Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADl-S)

Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a simplified biliopancreatic diversion. The objective of this study was to develop a reproducible animal model for SADI-S. We used three techniques for duodenal exclusion and duodenoileal anastomosis: (a) surgical clip and side-to-side anastomosis, (b) ligation and side-to-side anastomosis and (c) sectioning the duodenum, closing the duodenal stump and end-to-side anastomosis. We recorded the surgical technique and complications for each method. Twenty-five of 31 rats survived to the end of the study period. One death occurred from accidental anaesthesia overdose and the others from anastomosis leak. Four duodenal exclusions had repermeabilised at necropsy. Our murine model of SADI-S can be consistently reproduced. Sectioning the duodenum is preferable to avoid repermeabilisation of the duodenum.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in patients who underwent potentially curative resection for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of inflammation in cancer development is a well-known phenomenon that may be represented by the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The present research intends to determine the impact of NLR on the survival outcome of patients with gastric cancer (GC), and to evaluate its use as a stratification factor for the staging groups.

METHODS

Data regarding clinical characteristics, surgery, pathology, and follow-up were retrospectively collected from our single-center prospective database. Blood samples were obtained before surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients (231 males) who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy were evaluated between 2009 and 2016. NLR established cutoff was 2.44, and patients were divided in NLR ≥2.44 (hNLR) and <2.44 (lNLR). hNLR patients (38.4% of the cases) had lower disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared to lNLR patients (P = 0.047 and P = 0.045, respectively). Risk stratification according to NLR value was done in same tumor depth (T4 and <T4), stage (III and <III) and lymph node status (N+ and N-) group of patients. The OS was significantly lower when NLR was high in same tumor depth (P = 0.032) and stage (P = 0.020), but not in same lymph node status patients (P = 0.184). In a multivariate analysis, NLR was an independent factor of worse OS (HR 1.50 95%CI 1.27-4.21, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

A high NLR was an independent risk factor for reduced survival in GC patients submitted to potentially curative resection. Calculating NLR is easily reproducible and may be incorporated in pre-operative evaluation.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a "changing-concept" endoscopic resection technique, which safely allows resecting deep submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) wall. It's a highly promising endoscopic procedure that allows full-thickness excision of a small piece of the complete GI wall by using only a flexible endoscope. EFTR is a meeting point between surgery and endoscopy and probably the onset of many prospective combined minimally invasive therapeutic techniques that science will explore. In this review, use of the EFTR technique for gastrointestinal SMTs is highlighted, focusing on some technical aspects, indications, contraindications and outcomes.

Association between institutional procedural preference and in-hospital outcomes in laparoscopic surgeries; Insights from a retrospective cohort analysis of a nationwide surgical database in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of laparoscopic surgeries (LS) and the association between its performance and hospitals' preference for LS over open surgeries.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LS is increasingly used in many abdominal surgeries, albeit both with and without solid guideline recommendations. To date, the hospitals' preference (LS vs. open surgeries) and its association with in-hospital outcomes has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We enrolled patients undergoing 8 types of gastrointestinal surgeries in 2011-2013 in the Japanese National Clinical Database. We assessed the use of LS and the occurrences of surgery-related morbidity and mortality during the study period. Further, for 4 typical LS procedures, we assessed the hospitals' preference for LS by modeling the propensity to perform LS (over open surgeries) from patient-level factors, and estimating each institution's observed/expected (O/E) ratio for LS use. Institutions with O/E>2 were defined as LS-dominant. Using hierarchical logistic regression models, we assessed the association between LS preference and in-hospital outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1,377,118 patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures in 2,336 participating hospitals, use of LS increased in all 8 procedures (35.1% to 44.7% for distal gastrectomy (DG), and 27.5% to 43.2% for right hemi colectomy (RHC)). Those operated at LS-dominant hospitals were at an increased risk of operative death (OR 1.83 [95%CI, 1.37-2.45] for DG, 1.79 [95%CI, 1.43-2.25] for RHC) compared to standard O/E level hospitals (0.5≤O/E<2.0).

CONCLUSIONS

LS use widely increased during 2011-2013 in Japan. Facilities with higher than expected LS use had higher mortality compared to other hospitals, suggesting a need for careful patient selection and dissemination of the procedure.

Selective survival advantage associated with primary tumor resection for metastatic gastric cancer in a Western population

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) remains dismal, with a median survival of 10 months. Historically, primary tumor resection was not thought to confer any survival benefit. Although high-level data exist guiding treatment of metastatic GC for patients in the East, no such data exist for Western patients despite inherent ethnic differences in GC biology.

METHODS

The 2006-2012 National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients were classified into those who underwent primary tumor resection and chemotherapy (PTRaC) and those who received chemotherapy only. Groups were propensity score matched, and survival was compared using advanced statistical modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 7026 patients met the inclusion criteria: 6129 (87%) patients were treated with chemotherapy alone and 897 (13%) patients were treated with PTRaC. After multivariable adjustment, patients who underwent PTRaC had a significantly better overall survival (OS) than patients who received systemic therapy only (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.56-0.64; p < 0.001). Following full bipartite propensity score-adjusted analysis, 2-year OS for patients who received chemotherapy only was 12.6% (95% CI, 11.7-13.5%), whereas it was 34.2% (95% CI, 31.3-37.5%) for patients who underwent PTRaC (HR for resection: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.47-0.57; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that there exists a subset of patients with metastatic GC for which PTRaC may improve OS. As significant uncertainty still remains, our results support the need for further prospective trials investigating the influence of palliative gastrectomy on survival among Western patients.

Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? a comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become popular due to its technical ease and excellent short-term results. Understanding the risk profile of LSG compared with the gold standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is critical for patient selection.

OBJECTIVES

To use traditional regression techniques and random forest classification algorithms to compare LSG with LRYGB using the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Data Registry.

SETTING

United States.

METHODS

Outcomes were leak, morbidity, and mortality within 30 days. Variable importance was assessed using random forest algorithms. Multivariate models were created in a training set and evaluated on the testing set with receiver operating characteristic curves. The adjusted odds of each outcome were compared.

RESULTS

Of 134,142 patients, 93,062 (69%) underwent LSG and 41,080 (31%) underwent LRYGB. One hundred seventy-eight deaths occurred in 96 (.1%) of LSG patients compared with 82 (.2%) of LRYGB patients (P<.001). Morbidity occurred in 8% (5.8% in LSG versus 11.7% in LRYGB, P<.001). Leaks occurred in 1% (.8% in LSG versus 1.6% in LRYGB, P<.001). The most important predictors of all outcomes were body mass index, albumin, and age. In the adjusted multivariate models, LRYGB had higher odds of all complications (leak: odds ratio 2.10, P<.001; morbidity: odds ratio 2.02, P<.001; death: odds ratio 1.64, P<.01).

CONCLUSION

In the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvements data registry for 2015, LSG had half the risk-adjusted odds of death, serious morbidity, and leak in the first 30 days compared with LRYGB.

Impact of preoperative anemia on outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis of 2163 Chinese patients

We sought to evaluate whether preoperative anemia was an important determinant of survival in gastric cancer (GC). A single institution cohort of 2163 GC patients who underwent curative resection were retrospectively analyzed. Anemia was defined as a preoperative hemoglobin level <120 g/L in males and <110 g/L in females. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was performed to identify the independent prognostic factor. Anemic patients had a poorer OS compared with nonanemic patients after resection for tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) stage III tumors (5-year OS rate: 32.2% vs. 45.7%, P < 0.001) but not stage I (P  =  0.480) or stage II (P  =  0.917) tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative anemia was an independent prognostic factor in TNM stage III (hazard ratio [HR], 1.771; 95% CI, 1.040-3.015; P = 0.035). In a stage-stratified analysis, preoperative anemia was still independently associated with OS in TNM stages IIIa through IIIc (P < 0.001, P = 0.075, and P = 0.012, respectively), though the association was only marginal in stage IIIb. Of note, preoperative mild anemia had a similar prognostic value in TNM stage III GC. Furthermore, preoperative anemia was significantly associated with more perioperative transfusions, postoperative complications and several nutritional-based indices, including the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), preoperative weight loss and performance status (all P < 0.05). Preoperative anemia, even mild anemia, was an important predictor of postoperative survival for TNM stage III GC.

Association of Bariatric Surgery Using Laparoscopic Banding, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Usual Care Obesity Management With All-Cause Mortality

IMPORTANCE

Bariatric surgery is an effective and safe approach for weight loss and short-term improvement in metabolic disorders such as diabetes. However, studies have been limited in most settings by lack of a nonsurgical group, losses to follow-up, missing data, and small sample sizes in clinical trials and observational studies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of 3 common types of bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical treatment with mortality and other clinical outcomes among obese patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study in a large Israeli integrated health fund covering 54% of Israeli citizens with less than 1% turnover of members annually. Obese adult patients who underwent bariatric surgery between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2014, were selected and compared with obese nonsurgical patients matched on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes, with a final follow-up date of December 31, 2015. A total of 33 540 patients were included in this study.

EXPOSURES

Bariatric surgery (laparoscopic banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy) or usual care obesity management only (provided by a primary care physician and which may include dietary counseling and behavior modification).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome, all-cause mortality, matched and adjusted for BMI prior to surgery, age, sex, socioeconomic status, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and smoking.

RESULTS

The study population included 8385 patients who underwent bariatric surgery (median age, 46 [IQR, 37-54] years; 5490 [65.5%] women; baseline median BMI, 40.6 [IQR, 38.5-43.7]; laparoscopic banding [n = 3635], gastric bypass [n = 1388], laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [n = 3362], and 25 155 nonsurgical matched patients (median age, 46 [IQR, 37-54] years; 16 470 [65.5%] women; baseline median BMI, 40.5 [IQR, 37.0-43.5]). The availability of follow-up data was 100% for all-cause mortality. There were 105 deaths (1.3%) among surgical patients during a median follow-up of 4.3 (IQR, 2.8-6.6) years (including 61 [1.7%] who underwent laparoscopic banding, 18 [1.3%] gastric bypass, and 26 [0.8%] sleeve gastrectomy), and 583 deaths (2.3%) among nonsurgical patients during a median follow-up of 4.0 (IQR, 2.6-6.2) years. The absolute difference was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.86-3.15) fewer deaths/1000 person-years in the surgical vs nonsurgical group. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality among nonsurgical vs surgical patients were 2.02 (95% CI, 1.63-2.52) for the entire study population; by surgical type, HRs were 2.01 (95% CI, 1.50-2.69) for laparoscopic banding, 2.65 (95% CI, 1.55-4.52) for gastric bypass, and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.02-2.51) for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among obese patients in a large integrated health fund in Israel, bariatric surgery using laparoscopic banding, gastric bypass, or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, compared with usual care nonsurgical obesity management, was associated with lower all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of approximately 4.5 years. The evidence of this association adds to the limited literature describing beneficial outcomes of these 3 types of bariatric surgery compared with usual care obesity management alone.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Is it a must or a fake?

AIM

To investigate the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) effect on the survival of patients with proper stomach cancer submitted to D2 gastrectomy.

METHODS

We proceeded to a review of the literature with PubMed, Embase, ASCO and ESMO meeting abstracts as well as computerized use of the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NAC followed by surgery (NAC + S) with surgery alone (SA) for gastric cancer (GC). The primary outcome was the overall survival rate. Secondary outcomes were the site of the primary tumor, extension of node dissection according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) performed in both arms, disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates, clinical and pathological response rates and resectability rates after perioperative treatment.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 16 randomized controlled trials comparing NAC + S (n = 1089) with SA (n = 973) published in the period from January 1993 - March 2017. Only 6 of these studies were well-designed, structured trials in which the type of lymph node (LN) dissection performed or at least suggested in the trial protocol was reported. Two out of three of the RCTs with D2 lymphadenectomy performed in almost all cases failed to show survival benefit in the NAC arm. In the third RCT, the survival rate was not even reported, and the primary end points were the clinical outcomes of surgery with and without NAC. In the remaining three RCTs, D2 lymph node dissection was performed in less than 50% of cases or only recommended in the “Study Treatment” protocol without any description in the results of the procedure really perfomed. In one of the two studies, the benefit of NAC was evident only for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers. In the second study, there was no overall survival benefit of NAC. In the last trial, which documented a survival benefit for the NAC arm, the chemotherapy effect was mostly evident for EGJ cancer, and more than one-fourth of patients did not have a proper stomach cancer. Additionally, several patients did not receive resectional surgery. Furthermore, the survival rates of international reference centers that provide adequate surgery for homogeneous stomach cancer patients’ populations are even higher than the survival rates reported after NAC followed by incomplete surgery.

CONCLUSION

NAC for GC has been rapidly introduced in international western guidelines without an evidence-based medicine-related demonstration of its efficacy for a homogeneous population of patients with only stomach tumors submitted to adequate surgery following JGCA guidelines with extended (D2) LN dissection. Additional larger sample-size multicentre RCTs comparing the newer NAC regimens including molecular therapies followed by adequate extended surgery with surgery alone are needed.

Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Impact on outcomes

AIM

To evaluate whether the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-surgery interval time significantly impacts the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and long-term survival.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-six patients with gastric cancer undergoing NACT and a planned gastrectomy at the Chinese PLA General Hospital were selected from January 2011 to January 2017. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to investigate the impact of NACT-surgery interval time (< 4 wk, 4-6 wk, and > 6 wk) on pCR rate and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The NACT-surgery interval time and clinician T stage were independent predictors of pCR. The interval time > 6 wk was associated with a 74% higher odds of pCR as compared with an interval time of 4-6 wk (P = 0.044), while the odds ratio (OR) of clinical T₃vs clinical T₄ stage for pCR was 2.90 (95%CI: 1.04-8.01, P = 0.041). In Cox regression analysis of long-term survival, post-neoadjuvant therapy pathological N (ypN) stage significantly impacted OS (N₀vs N₃: HR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.37-0.70, P = 0.015; N₁vs N₃: HR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.02-0.81, P = 0.029) and disease-free survival (DFS) (N₀vs N₃: HR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.24-0.52, P = 0.005; N₁vs N₃: HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.02-0.71, P = 0.020). The surgical procedure also had a positive impact on OS and DFS. The hazard ratio of distal gastrectomy vs total gastrectomy was 0.12 (95%CI: 0.33-0.42, P = 0.001) for OS, and 0.13 (95%CI: 0.36-0.44, P = 0.001) for DFS.

CONCLUSION

The NACT-surgery interval time is associated with pCR but has no impact on survival, and an interval time > 6 wk has a relatively high odds of pCR.