Refractory juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors

Treatment outcomes in drug resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: Valproate resistance may not be the end of the road

OBJECTIVE

To determine treatment responses to various antiseizure medicines (ASMs) in patients with drug resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (DRJME) METHODS: We reviewed records of all JME patients attending epilepsy clinics at 5 centers during a 5-year period. We used International Consensus Criteria to diagnose JME and International League Against Epilepsy Criteria to define drug resistance and sustained seizure freedom. We only used broad spectrum medicines which included valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, clobazam, phenobarbitone, clonazepam, and zonisamide. We considered an ASM successful if patient achieved seizure freedom within 3 months of attaining maintenance dose.

RESULTS

We studied 116 patients (61 males) with DRJME. At terminal followup, 82 (70.7%) patients had achieved sustained seizure freedom with a mean followup of 3.2 ± 1.3 years after last dose change. In patients where valproate failed as first- or second-line ASM (n=70; 60.3%), 49(70%) became seizure-free. In this group, 33(67%) patients became seizure-free after addition of lamotrigine. Success rate of lamotrigine and valproate combination was 69% as compared to 9% with all other combinations (p = 0.001). In patients who were not exposed to valproate as initial therapy (n=46), 33 (71.7%) became seizure-free, 30 (91%) after adding valproate. At last follow-up, 75 (90%) seizure-free patients were receiving valproate including 45 (55%) patients with a combination of valproate and lamotrigine. Only one of 24 patients became seizure-free after failing valproate and lamotrigine combination.

CONCLUSION

Seizure freedom can be achieved in two-thirds of patients with DRJME. A combination of valproate and lamotrigine is the most effective duotherapy.

Therapeutic approach to difficult-to-treat typical absences and related epilepsy syndromes

Introduction: typical absences (TAs), are brief, generalized epileptic seizures of abrupt onset and termination clinically manifesting with impairment of awareness and associated with 3 Hz spike-wave discharges on EEG. TAs may occur in different idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE). Despite treatment with adequate anti-seizure medications (ASMs), TAs may persist in ~25% of subjects. This narrative review focuses on the therapeutic approach to difficult-to-treat TAs occurring in the setting of IGE.Areas covered: a literature search was conducted on the topic of treatment of TAs.Expert opinion: ethosuximide (ESX), valproic acid (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG), alone or in combination, are considered the first-choice drugs. In women of childbearing potential, VPA should be avoided. Alternative therapies (benzodiazepines, levetiracetam, topiramate, or zonisamide) should be considered in subjects unresponsive to monotherapy after the exclusion of pseudo-drug resistance. Newer ASMs such as brivaracetam and perampanel seem to be promising options. Well-conducted clinical trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of alternative monotherapy (beyond ESX, VPA or LTG) or combination of ASMs on difficult-to-treat TAs, are warranted.

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: Long-term prognosis and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to investigate the long-term clinical course of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) in a cohort of patients and to identify prognostic factors for refractoriness and seizure relapse after anti-seizure medications (ASMs) withdrawal. A literature review is also presented to consolidate and compare our findings with the previously reported cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a series of patients diagnosed with JME with 15 years or more of evolution. We collected clinical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging data from patients who met defined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Study involved 61 patients (65.5% female) with mean age at study of 37.6 years, and mean age at its outset of 14.8 years. Median follow-up was 31.0 years (mean 28.9, range 15-53). They presented more frequently with a combination of myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) (65.6%). Sixty-five percent of patients (n = 40) had a 5-year terminal remission with a mean age at last seizure of 27.4 years. Thirty-two percent of seizure-free patients (n = 13) withdrew ASMs: 6 out of 13 had a recurrence of the seizures while 7 remained seizure-free (mean age at ASMs withdrawal 21.0 versus 35.7 years, p < 0.05). In the multivariate model, a high GTCS frequency at onset (p = 0.026) was a prognostic factor of drug resistance.

CONCLUSION

JME is often regarded as a benign epileptic syndrome, although a quarter of the individuals have refractory epilepsy. The possibility of withdrawing ASMs in patients who have been free of seizures over an extended time seems feasible.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to drug-resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), also known as Janz syndrome, is a common form of generalized epilepsy of presumed genetic origin representing up to 10% of all epilepsy cases. Despite adequate anti-seizure medication (ASM) treatment, seizures persist in one-third of JME patients.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted using Pubmed search on the topics of drug-resistant JME.

EXPERT OPINION

About 30% of JME patients are drug-resistant. Valproate (VPA) is considered the first-choice drug. In women of childbearing potential, levetiracetam (LEV) should represent the first-choice treatment. Alternative monotherapy or add-on therapy should be considered in subjects with resistant seizures after the exclusion of pseudo-drug resistance. The choice of the add-on ASM depends on the predominant seizure type. In subjects with persistent bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, LEV or lamotrigine should be firstly considered. In patients with difficult-to-treat myoclonic seizures, clonazepam or LEV are recommended. In case of persistent absences, ethosuximide should be considered. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, VPA should remain available as an option in women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments.

Prognostic Value of Generalized Polyspike Trains and Prolonged Epileptiform EEG Runs

INTRODUCTION

A considerable proportion of patients with genetic/idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) suffer from persistent seizures. In this study, it was questioned if generalized polyspike trains (GPT) or prolonged epileptiform EEG runs allow identification of difficult-to-treat patients in a first seizure clinic setting or after recurrent seizures.

METHODS

The first routine outpatient EEGs from untreated patients (later diagnosed with IGE) and routine EEGs from IGE patients with persistent seizures despite medical treatment were analyzed. Seizure outcome and clinical characteristics were retrospectively assessed based on the patients' records.

RESULTS

In routine EEGs recorded after first seizure in untreated patients (n = 79), the prevalence of GPT (n = 1; 1.3%) and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs (n = 13; 16.5%) was low. At follow-up, 24 patients (30.4%) were not seizure free, and 3 (3.8%) of them developed drug-resistant IGE. None of the interictal discharges studied was associated with long-term seizure outcome. Treated IGE patients with recurrent seizures (n = 69) had a similar prevalence of GPT (n = 3; 4.3%) and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs (n = 7; 10.1%). At follow-up, 42 patients (60.8%) suffered persistent seizures, and 18 (26%) were drug resistant. Generalized polyspike train and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs had a higher prevalence in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (GPT: 11.1% vs. 2%; P = 0.1; prolonged epileptiform EEG runs: 27.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.004) and persistent seizures (GPT: 7.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.16; prolonged epileptiform EEG runs: 16.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.03) as compared with nonresistant patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Generalized polyspike train and prolonged epileptiform EEG runs were associated with persistent seizures and drug-resistant IGE, but the overall prevalence was low. In a first seizure clinic setting, the diagnostic value of these biomarkers was limited.

Magnetic evoked potential polyphasia in idiopathic/genetic generalized epilepsy: An endophenotype not associated with treatment response

OBJECTIVE

Increased Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) polyphasia was recently described in idiopathic/genetic generalized epilepsy (IGE). Here, we studied the association of MEP polyphasia with treatment response and other clinical characteristics in patients with IGE.

METHODS

MEPs were recorded from the biceps brachii, flexor carpi radialis and interosseus dorsalis muscles bilaterally during tonic contraction in IGE patients (n = 72) and historical controls (n = 54) after single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Detailed clinical data was available for all IGE patients; predefined endpoint was the association of MEP polyphasia with treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean number of phases was higher in the interosseus dorsalis muscle (2.33 vs. 2.13, p = 0.002) in IGE patients as compared to normal controls, as was the proportion of MEPs with more than two phases in at least one test (59.4% vs. 30%, p < 0.002). MEP polyphasia did not differ between IGE patients and controls in the biceps brachii or the flexor carpi radialis muscles and was not associated with treatment response. Extensive exploratory analyses unveiled fewer phases under valproic acid treatment (p = 0.04) but no additional associations of MEP polyphasia in the interosseous muscle with other clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSION

MEP polyphasia is a subclinical symptom of IGE patients but is not associated with treatment response or other routinely assessed clinical characteristics.

SIGNIFICANCE

MEP polyphasia is a fixed feature of IGE not modified by clinical variables.

Slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in refractory juvenile myoclonic epilepsies

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on patients with refractory juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).

METHODS

One thousand pulses with the intensity of 120% active motor threshold (AMT) at 0.2 Hz frequency were applied on 5 consecutive days in 10 patients with refractory JME. Sham rTMS was performed after 3 months. Electroencephalography (EEG) examinations were performed before rTMS, on the 5th day, and 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after rTMS. Resting motor threshold (RMT), AMT, and cortical silent periods (CSPs) were recorded before the application and at the end of day 5. The changes in the quality of life were evaluated using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31).

RESULTS

No adverse effects were observed. The number of seizures decreased by 29-50%, and interictal discharge durations decreased 2 weeks after the real rTMS. No significant difference was observed between the AMT and RMT values recorded before and after the stimulations. Statistically significant increases in CSP duration and quality of life scores were found following real rTMS. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be considered as a safe treatment option in refractory JME.

CONCLUSION

This study provides some positive evidence that rTMS may be effective in resistant JME.

Patterns and prognostic markers for treatment response in generalized epilepsies

Objective

To determine the pattern of treatment response in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) and whether routinely assessed clinical and neurophysiological parameters allow predicting response to lamotrigine, levetiracetam, or valproic acid.

Methods

In 328 adult patients with IGE, demographic data, imaging, EEG data, current and prior antiepileptic treatment, treatment outcome, and side effects were analyzed from the patients' medical files and patient interviews.

Results

Seizure freedom with acceptable side effects at the first attempt was achieved in 61 (18.6%) patients. One hundred four (31.7%) patients tried ≥3 antiepileptic drugs before achieving seizure control at the last follow-up. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and valproic acid showed differential response rates (39.8% vs 47.5% vs 71.1%) that were most pronounced in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. The risk of having side effects was higher with valproic acid (23.7%) than with lamotrigine (10.4%) or levetiracetam (20.4%) treatment, contributing to the low retention rate of valproic acid (53.7%). Treatment resistance was associated with established risk factors. Multivariate analyses aiming at identifying clinical indicators for response to specific drugs did not reveal putative biomarkers when corrected for drug resistance.

Conclusion

Despite a high rate of seizure control, the chance of achieving seizure control and acceptable side effects at first attempt was low due to an inverse association of effectiveness and side effects of the 3 most commonly used drugs. Routinely assessed clinical parameters were not indicative for response to specific drugs.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with IGE, various clinical factors do not predict a response to specific antiepileptic drugs.

Psychiatric Comorbidities in People With Epilepsy

Purpose of Review

To review the latest evidence concerning the epidemiology, clinical implications, and management of psychiatric disorders in epilepsy.

Recent Findings

People with epilepsy have a 2-5 times increased risk of developing any psychiatric disorder, and 1 in 3 patients with epilepsy have a lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatric comorbidities represent a poor prognostic marker as they have been associated with a poor response to treatment (drugs and surgery), increased morbidity, and mortality. Validated screening instruments are available for mood and anxiety disorders in adults as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with epilepsy.

Summary

All patients with epilepsy should be routinely screened for psychiatric disorder at the onset and at least once a year. Patients with epilepsy and their relatives should be informed of the risk of mental health problems and the implications.

Psychiatric aspects of posttraumatic epilepsy: A still unexplored area

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents one of the most common causes of death and disability in young people, and posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) accounts for 10% to 20% of all symptomatic epilepsies. However, PTE is still a relatively underappreciated condition. This paper aimed at reviewing current knowledge about psychiatric comorbidities of PTE, looking in particular at the nature of the relationship between TBI, psychiatric problems, and epilepsy, at the phenomenology of psychiatric disorders in PTE, and how to manage them. Data on psychiatric comorbidities of PTE are almost nonexistent, and this is a paradox considering that TBI itself is burdened by a number of cognitive and psychiatric sequelae, which can profoundly affect the everyday life of these patients. Preliminary data seem to suggest that the bidirectional relationship between epilepsy and psychiatric disorders is maintained in TBI and people with a psychiatric condition at the time of the TBI, or as a consequence of it, are at increased risk of developing PTE and vice versa. However, a number of questions are still unanswered concerning the genetic and environmental contributors, the phenomenology of psychiatric disorders in PTE, and how to prevent and address them properly. Further research in this area is urgently needed in order to provide the best possible care to people with PTE. Special Issue: Epilepsy & Behavior's 20th Anniversary.

Subtle Brain Developmental Abnormalities in the Pathogenesis of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), a lifelong disorder that starts during adolescence, is the most common of genetic generalized epilepsy syndromes. JME is characterized by awakening myoclonic jerks and myoclonic-tonic-clonic (m-t-c) grand mal convulsions. Unfortunately, one third of JME patients have drug refractory m-t-c convulsions and these recur in 70-80% who attempt to stop antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Behavioral studies documented impulsivity, but also impairment of executive functions relying on organization and feedback, which points to prefrontal lobe dysfunction. Quantitative voxel-based morphometry (VBM) revealed abnormalities of gray matter (GM) volumes in cortical (frontal and parietal) and subcortical structures (thalamus, putamen, and hippocampus). Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) found evidence of dysfunction of thalamic neurons. White matter (WM) integrity was disrupted in corpus callosum and frontal WM tracts. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) further unveiled anomalies in both GM and WM structures that were already present at the time of seizure onset. Aberrant growth trajectories of brain development occurred during the first 2 years of JME diagnosis. Because of genetic origin, disease causing variants were sought, first by positional cloning, and most recently, by next generation sequencing. To date, only six genes harboring pathogenic variants (GABRA1, GABRD, EFHC1, BRD2, CASR, and ICK) with Mendelian and complex inheritance and covering a limited proportion of the world population, are considered as major susceptibility alleles for JME. Evidence on the cellular role, developmental and cell-type expression profiles of these six diverse JME genes, point to their pathogenic variants driving the first steps of brain development when cell division, expansion, axial, and tangential migration of progenitor cells (including interneuron cortical progenitors) sculpture subtle alterations in brain networks and microcircuits during development. These alterations may explain "microdysgenesis" neuropathology, impulsivity, executive dysfunctions, EEG polyspike waves, and awakening m-t-c convulsions observed in JME patients.

Antiepileptic drug withdrawal in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been discouraged in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). However, impulsivity as a consequence of executive dysfunction in JME may influence treatment adherence. The aim of the present study was to assess how common withdrawal of AEDs is in a large and representative JME group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) were identified through a retrospective search of medical records at Drammen Hospital, Norway, and invited to a clinical interview. Information related to AED withdrawal was analyzed in those classified as JME.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients with GGE were interviewed (87 JME). Thirty-five patients with JME (40%) discontinued AEDs, of which 74% did so without consulting a doctor. The rate of self-withdrawal was significantly higher in JME than in other types of GGE. Having a parent with psychosocial difficulties was significantly over-represented in the JME self-withdrawal group. Twelve of those who discontinued AEDs (34%) were free from generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) and without antiepileptic drugs >1 year. All but one of them withdrew AEDs without consulting a doctor. Age at first motor seizure was significantly higher in those with a favorable outcome of AED withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-withdrawal of AEDs is common in JME, especially in those with troublesome conditions at home. However, about 1/3 may remain free from GTCS without AEDs. The findings indicate a need for a stronger follow-up with appropriate information about the prognosis of the disorder.