Difficult intubation in paediatrics

The Shikani Seeing Stylet for difficult intubation in children: initial experience

The Shikani Seeing Stylet is a recently introduced reusable intubating stylet, produced in adult and paediatric versions. It combines features of a fibreoptic bronchoscope and a lightwand. Inside a malleable stainless steel sheath, the Shikani Seeing Stylet has a fibreoptic cable leading to a distal light source and high-resolution lens. In use, the stylet is placed in the lumen of the selected endotracheal tube and the light source enables the stylet to be used as a lightwand, while the fibreoptic capability enables visualization of the laryngeal inlet. It is portable, relatively inexpensive and easy to maintain. This report describes the use of the stylet on eight occasions in seven children, all of whom were assessed preoperatively as being potentially difficult to intubate. Three had been difficult to intubate previously. All were anaesthetized using inhalational anaesthesia. Once an adequate depth of anaesthesia had been achieved, conventional direct laryngoscopy was performed and identified as Grade 3 in six of the patients and Grade 1 in one. Tracheal intubation was then attempted using the Shikani Seeing Stylet. On six of the eight occasions the attempt was made by different anaesthetists, none of whom had any prior clinical experience with the stylet. There were seven successful intubations and one failure in a patient who could not be intubated by any method. The Shikani Seeing Stylet seems a useful device for use in children with difficult airway problems, suspected cervical spine instability or limited mouth-opening.

Difficult tracheal intubation induced by maxillary distraction devices in craniosynostosis syndromes

BACKGROUND

Difficult intubation occurred during anaesthesia for removal of maxillary distraction devices in five of seven children with syndromal craniosynostoses (four with Apert, two with Pfeiffer and one with Crouzon syndrome).

METHODS

Intubation was assessed in terms of laryngeal view and an established intubation difficulty score and had been straightforward before device insertion. Difficulty was induced by trismus due to device insertion and by increased maxillary prominence. This was compounded by preexisting mandibular hypoplasia. Cephalometric analysis, with each child acting as their own control, demonstrated anterior displacement of the maxilla and increased maxillary vertical height, as well as increased protuberance of the maxillary incisors.

RESULTS

All five difficult tracheal intubations were associated with preoperative Mallampati scores of 3 or 4 and the nine straightforward intubations with scores of 1 or 2. Maximal interincisor distance was less than the lower 95% confidence limit for age in all five children who were difficult to intubate at the time of device removal. No child had a failed intubation, but all had significantly increased intubation difficulty.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the risks of trauma, hypoxia and aspiration associated with difficult direct laryngoscopy, we recommend elective fibreoptic intubation at anaesthesia for removal of maxillary distraction osteogenesis devices in these children.

Appropriateness of endotracheal tube size and insertion depth in children undergoing air medical transport

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines for pediatric endotracheal tube (ETT) size and insertion depth are important in the helicopter EMS (HEMS) setting, where intubated patients are frequently transported by a non-physician flight crew providing protocol-based care in an environment noted for limitations in clinical airway assessment. The objectives of this study were to characterize, in a HEMS pediatric population, the frequency of compliance with guideline-recommended ETT size and insertion depth, and to test for association between guideline noncompliance and subsequent receiving hospital adjustment of ETT size or insertion depth.

DESIGN

This retrospective review analyzed 216 consecutive pediatric (age <14) scene and interfacility HEMS transports, of patients intubated before or during HEMS transport, by an urban two-helicopter HEMS service providing protocol-based care with a nurse/paramedic crew configuration. Patients were transported to one of three receiving academic pediatric referral centers. Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) criteria for ETT size and insertion depth were used to assess guideline-appropriateness of pediatric ETTs. Receiving hospital records were reviewed to determine if post-transport ETT size or lipline adjustment were associated with guideline-appropriateness of size and lipline during HEMS transport. Univariate (chi-square and Fisher's exact) and multivariate (logistic regression) statistics were used to assess and control for the following covariates: intubator group (physician, flight crew, ground EMS), transport year, sex, age, transport type (scene versus interfacility), and receiving hospital. For all analyses, statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level.

RESULTS

The initial ETT size was within 0.5 mm of guideline-recommended sizes in 178 (83.6%) of the 213 patients for whom this data were available. Inappropriate sized ETTs were nearly always (32 of 35, 91.4%) too small. Compared to initial ETTs placed by ground EMS personnel, initial ETTs placed by flight crew or physicians were more likely to be appropriate as defined by guidelines (P = .008 and .032, respectively). Receiving hospitals changed the ETT size in 18 (8.3% of 216) cases. Receiving hospital ETT size change was more likely with later transport year (P = .018) and less likely in patients over 2 years of age (P = .03); there was no significant association between receiving hospital ETT size change and intubator group (P > .22) or guideline-appropriateness of ETT size (P = 0.94). The initial ETT insertion depth was within 1 cm of the guideline-recommended lipline in 86 (43.2%) of the 199 patients for whom this data were available. Inappropriate liplines were almost always (109 of 113, 96.5%) too deep. Compared to initial ETT liplines determined by ground EMS personnel, initial liplines determined by flight crew (P = .007), but not physician (P = .47) were more likely to be appropriate as defined by guidelines. Receiving hospitals changed the ETT insertion depth in 72 (33.3% of 216) cases. Receiving hospital lipline change was more likely (P = .03) in patients older than 2 years of age, but was not associated with intubator group (P = .75) or lipline guideline-appropriateness (P = .35).

CONCLUSIONS

As judged by frequently used guidelines, pediatric ETTs are often too small and commonly inserted too deep. However, this retrospective study, limited by lack of clinical correlation for ETT size and insertion depth, failed to find an association between lack of ETT size or lipline guideline compliance and subsequent ETT adjustment at receiving pediatric centers. This study's findings, which should be confirmed with prospective investigation, cast doubt upon the utility of pediatric ETT size/lipline guidelines as strict clinical or quality assurance tools for use in pediatric airway management.