Changes in the disposition of oxcarbazepine and its metabolites during pregnancy and the puerperium

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.

Value of therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has made it possible to study the individual variations in drug utilization, to reveal noncompliance in patients and for quality assurance aspects. Even if there is a shortage of data from randomized controlled studies concerning the effectiveness of using TDM as an aid to dosage adjustment, experience from nonrandomized investigations and long-lasting clinical experience have shown that TDM of both older and newer AEDs may be of clinical benefit if used appropriately. The main situations for TDM include: after starting treatment to provide a baseline steady-state concentration for further evaluation of an individual therapeutic concentration; after change in drug dosage, in particular when nonlinear kinetics apply; at therapeutic failure to sort out a pharmacokinetic explanation for uncontrolled seizures or side effects; in case of drug interactions; and when pharmacokinetic changes due to physiological or pathological changes are foreseen (e.g., age-dependent conditions [children, elderly], pregnancy, hepatic disease, renal disease or gastrointestinal conditions potentially affecting drug absorption) and change in drug formulation (brand name/generic). Recently, new terminology and definitions have been suggested by the International League Against Epilepsy. The reference range is a range of drug concentrations quoted by laboratories and is not a therapeutic range. Emphasis should be placed on the concept of an individual therapeutic concentration.

Does increased levetiracetam clearance during pregnancy require planned intervention?

Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam During Pregnancy, Delivery, in the Neonatal Period, and Lactation. Tomson T, Palm R, Källén K, Ben-Menachem E, Söderfeldt B, Danielsson B, Johansson R, Luef G, Ohman I. Epilepsia 2007;48:1111–1116. PURPOSE: To study pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam (LEV) during pregnancy, delivery, lactation, and in the neonatal period. METHODS: Fourteen women with epilepsy receiving LEV treatment during pregnancy and lactation contributed with 15 pregnancies to this prospective study in which LEV concentrations in plasma and breast milk were determined. Trough maternal plasma samples were collected each trimester, and at baseline after delivery. Blood samples were obtained at delivery from mothers, from the umbilical cord, and from newborns during 2 days after delivery. LEV concentration was also determined in breast milk and in plasma collected from 11 of the mothers and their suckling infants after birth. RESULTS: The umbilical cord/maternal plasma concentration ratios ranged from 0.56 to 2.0 (mean 1.15, n = 13). LEV plasma concentrations in the neonates declined with an estimated half-life of 18 h (n = 13). The mean milk/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 1.05 (range, 0.78–1.55, n = 11). The infant dose of LEV was estimated to 2.4 mg/kg/day, equivalent to 7.9% of the weight-normalized maternal dose. Plasma concentrations in breastfed were approximately 13% of the mother's plasma levels. Maternal plasma concentrations during third trimester were only 40% of baseline concentrations outside pregnancy (p < 0.001, n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest considerable transplacental transport of LEV and fairly slow elimination in the neonate. Plasma concentrations of LEV in nursed infants are low despite an extensive transfer of LEV into breast milk. Pregnancy appears to enhance the elimination of LEV resulting in marked decline in plasma concentration, which suggests that therapeutic monitoring may be of value.

Pregnancy, epilepsy, and anticonvulsants

The majority of epileptic disorders are not self-limiting over time, and therefore require a long-lasting and often even lifelong antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment, in Wi/omen with epilepsy, the influence of their disease on the possibility and course of pregnancies, as well as the potential impact of the AED treatment on mother and child, are crucial questions.

This review addresses the clinically relevant knovledge concerning the impact of the disease itself and the AED treatment on fertility, pregnancy, delivery, the postpartum period, and teratogenicity. Some of the new AEDs appear to have a favorable profile due to a lack of clinically relevant interactions and promising teratogenic profiles. However, the finding of decreases in lamotrigine serum concentrations during hormonal contraception and pregnancy is an instructive example, shovt/ing that ongoing studies are urgently needed to further investigate stillunanswered questions. Several prospective multinational surveys are currently being performed, and should add essential information in this context.

Serum concentration/dose ratio of levetiracetam before, during and after pregnancy

PURPOSE

To investigate changes in levetiracetam (LEV) serum concentration/dose ratio (C/D-ratio) in relation to pregnancy.

METHODS

Altogether 21 consecutive pregnancies in 20 women with epilepsy receiving LEV during gestation were studied retrospectively. The main target variable was the C/D-ratio before and during pregnancy, and in the post partum period. Secondary target variables were changes in LEV dose, concomitant use of other antiepileptic drugs and seizure frequency. Student's paired t-test and two-sample t-test for independent samples were used to test for statistically significant changes in C/D-ratio means.

RESULTS

Mean C/D-ratio in the third trimester was 50% of the mean C/D-ratio at baseline (p<0.001, n=11). Baseline levels were reached within the first weeks after pregnancy. The interindividual variability was pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum concentrations of LEV declined significantly in the third trimester of pregnancy and increased rapidly after delivery.

Antiepileptic drug therapy in pregnancy I: gestation-induced effects on AED pharmacokinetics

The ideal management of women with epilepsy during pregnancy involves achieving an optimal balance between minimizing fetal exposure to the deleterious influences of both antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and of seizures. Women with increased seizures during pregnancy tend to have subtherapeutic AED concentrations. Multiple physiological changes during pregnancy influence drug disposition, including increased volume of distribution, increased renal elimination, altered hepatic enzyme activity, and a decline in plasma protein concentrations. Many of the AEDs are characterized by significant increases in clearance during pregnancy. Studies performed thus far provide convincing findings for significant increases in the clearance of lamotrigine and phenytoin during pregnancy; other studies support that phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine, and levetiracetam clearances also most likely increase during pregnancy. Therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine with adjustment of dosages during pregnancy to maintain that individual's target concentration has been shown to decrease the risk for increased seizure frequency. Reports of seizure worsening with decreased concentrations of other AEDs have been reported but not studied in similar formal protocols. Future studies of formal pharmacokinetic modeling of AEDs during pregnancy, with assessment of maternal and fetal/newborn consequences, could provide an important step toward achieving effective drug dosing to maintain therapeutic objectives for the mother but at the same time minimize fetal drug exposure.

Plasma concentrations of lamotrigine and its 2-N-glucuronide metabolite during pregnancy in women with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To further characterize pregnancy-induced alterations in the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine (LTG).

METHODS

Fifteen women treated with LTG were studied during 17 pregnancies. Complete trough blood samples from all trimesters and baseline > 1 month after delivery were available for 12 pregnancies (Group A), whereas, five contributed with samples only from the third trimester and baseline (Group B). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine LTG plasma concentrations, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to assay the main metabolite 2-N-lamotrigine glucuronide (2-N-GLUC) in plasma.

RESULTS

In group A, the mean dose/plasma concentration ratio (D/C) of LTG at baseline after pregnancy was 66.5 +/- 17.9 (+/- SD) L/day and approximately 250% higher in late pregnancy. The mean lamotrigine-2-N-glucuronide/lamotrigine plasma concentration ratio (2-N-GLUC/LTG) was 0.349 +/- 0.141 (+/- SD) at baseline and 147% higher in late pregnancy. Taking group A and B together, the 2-N-GLUC/LTG ratio was 175% higher in the third trimester compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms a significant decline in LTG plasma levels during pregnancy in women on monotherapy with LTG. An increased 2-N-GLUC/LTG ratio suggests that this decline may be related to an increased metabolism of LTG by glucuronidation.

Pharmacology of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy and lactation

Most women with epilepsy require continuous treatment during pregnancy, making antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) one of the most frequent chronic teratogen exposures. Therapeutic decisions should balance the risks to the developing fetus of AED exposure and of not treating or undertreating the epilepsy. The International AED Pharmacology Work Group of the Health Outcomes in Pregnancy and Epilepsy (HOPE) Forum identified four pharmacology topics critical to enhancing maternal and fetal outcomes for pregnancies exposed to AEDs: (1) hormonal therapies and endogenous changes: bidirectional interactions with AEDs; (2) pharmacokinetic alterations during pregnancy, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring, and the influence on seizure control and maternal and fetal outcomes; (3) multidrug transporters and their various roles during pregnancy; (4) breastfeeding in mothers taking AEDs. The report provides an overview of these key topics, highlights gaps in the current knowledge, and provides future directions for needed research.

Epilepsy in pregnancy

This article explores the therapeutic problems that arise when a patient with epilepsy on treatment becomes pregnant and needs both effective seizure control and attention to the safety of her fetus

Women with epilepsy: hormonal issues from menarche through menopause

Epilepsy is a multilayered disorder complicated by numerous comorbid conditions and hormonal changes. More than 1.5 million girls and women with epilepsy face side effects that are compounded at different ages by menstruation, fertility, pregnancy, fetal health, bone health, and other health issues. Changes in hormonal balance during maturation, from menarche through menopause, affect seizure thresholds and antiepileptic drugs, and vice versa. This overview provides physicians with a background on the multiple issues relevant to women of all ages in the reproductive years, including those planning to conceive and those who are pregnant, and beyond the childbearing years.

Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam during Pregnancy, Delivery, in the Neonatal Period, and Lactation

PURPOSE

To study pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam (LEV) during pregnancy, delivery, lactation, and in the neonatal period.

METHODS

Fourteen women with epilepsy receiving LEV treatment during pregnancy and lactation contributed with 15 pregnancies to this prospective study in which LEV concentrations in plasma and breast milk were determined. Trough maternal plasma samples were collected each trimester, and at baseline after delivery. Blood samples were obtained at delivery from mothers, from the umbilical cord, and from newborns during 2 days after delivery. LEV concentration was also determined in breast milk and in plasma collected from 11 of the mothers and their suckling infants after birth.

RESULTS

The umbilical cord/maternal plasma concentration ratios ranged from 0.56-2.0 (mean 1.15, n=13). LEV plasma concentrations in the neonates declined with an estimated half-life of 18 h (n=13). The mean milk/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 1.05 (range, 0.78-1.55, n=11). The infant dose of LEV was estimated to 2.4 mg/kg/day, equivalent to 7.9% of the weight-normalized maternal dose. Plasma concentrations in breastfed were approximately 13% of the mother's plasma levels. Maternal plasma concentrations during third trimester were only 40% of baseline concentrations outside pregnancy (p<0.001, n=7)

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations suggest considerable transplacental transport of LEV and fairly slow elimination in the neonate. Plasma concentrations of LEV in nursed infants are low despite an extensive transfer of LEV into breast milk. Pregnancy appears to enhance the elimination of LEV resulting in marked decline in plasma concentration, which suggests that therapeutic monitoring may be of value.

A Novel Enantioselective Microassay for the High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Determination of Oxcarbazepine and Its Active Metabolite Monohydroxycarbazepine in Human Plasma

A simple and innovative assay is described that allows the determination of the antiepileptic drug oxcarbazepine and the chiral separation of the two enantiomers of its active metabolite monohydroxycarbazepine (licarbazepine). The assay requires liquid-liquid extraction of the sample (200 microL) into tert-butyl methyl ether and dichloromethane, drying of the organic phase under a nitrogen stream, reconstitution with the mobile phase, and injection in the high-performance liquid chromatography system after filtering. Separation of oxcarbazepine, R-(-)-monohydroxycarbazepine, S-(+)-monohydroxycarbazepine, and the second-step metabolite 10,11-trans-dihydroxycarbamazepine (racemate) is achieved with a Chiralcel ODR column and potassium hexafluorophosphate/acetonitrile as mobile phase. Detection is by ultraviolet absorbance at 210 nm. Standard curves are linear (r2 > or = 0.999) over the range of 0.1 to 25 microg/mL for each analyte with a limit of quantification of 0.1 microg/mL (1 ng injected) for all compounds. Within-day and between-day precision is better than 12% and within-day and between-day accuracy is between 99% and 116% for each compound. These performance characteristics are adequate for pharmacokinetic studies and for therapeutic drug monitoring. However, because the two enantiomers of monohydroxycarbazepine exhibit similar pharmacologic activity, nonenantioselective assays are likely to be more cost-effective for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes.

Therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy and in the postpartum period: is it useful?

As in all patient populations, epilepsy is common in pregnant women. Consequently, approximately 1 in 200 pregnancies is exposed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Although exposure to AEDs in utero has been associated with an increased risk of major fetal malformations, most women with epilepsy require medication throughout pregnancy, since seizures themselves may be potentially harmful not only for the mother but also for the developing fetus. Physiological changes during pregnancy result in a reduction in the serum concentrations of most AEDs, particularly in late pregnancy. Changes in protein binding lead to a greater reduction in total than free (active) drug concentrations. Pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy show interindividual variability and are not well understood for most newer AEDs. However, recent studies have shown that changes in lamotrigine clearance are particularly marked, with increases in each trimester and a significant fall in plasma concentrations, leading to consequent breakthrough seizures in some women. Concentrations may then rise precipitously after delivery, leading to symptoms of lamotrigine toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring could theoretically guide adjustment of AED dosage to achieve good seizure control while minimising fetal exposure, although there are several limitations to such monitoring. Firstly, there are wide interindividual variations in serum drug concentrations, with seizure control often correlating poorly with a given therapeutic range. Secondly, therapeutic ranges have not been well defined for newer AEDs and their measurement is often not always available. Thirdly, for highly protein-bound drugs, although measurement of free drug concentrations may more accurately reflect drug availability during pregnancy than total drug concentrations, assays for this are not always available and may be unreliable. Thus, it may be useful, prior to pregnancy, to establish the total and free drug concentrations required to achieve optimal seizure control in a given individual. Regular monitoring of AEDs has been advocated in each trimester and shortly after delivery, with adjustment of dosage to avoid seizure precipitation during pregnancy or symptoms of toxicity after birth. More frequent monitoring has been recommended for lamotrigine. However, aggressive drug monitoring of any AED has yet to be proven to be effective in improving seizure control or care. Furthermore, higher doses may be associated with a greater potential for teratogenicity and it is not yet known whether longer term adverse effects may be related to in utero exposure in the latter half of pregnancy. There is limited evidence about the relationship of maternal serum drug concentrations and teratogenicity. While there is a theoretical role for therapeutic drug monitoring in improving the risk-to-benefit ratio of AED therapy during pregnancy, there are many practical limitations. Future work is needed to clarify its role in improving seizure control during pregnancy and identifying serum drug concentrations that may be considered safe for fetal exposure.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Eigth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII)

The Eigth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)-EILAT VII, took place in Sitges, Barcelona from the 10th to 14th September, 2006. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 24 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included a focus on status epilepticus (epidemiology, current and future treatments), evidence-based treatment guidelines and the potential of neurostimulation in refractory epilepsy. Consistent with previous formats of this conference, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well as updates on marketed AEDs introduced since 1989. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in development, including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA-2-093), fluorofelbamate, ganaxolone, huperzine, lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide, seletracetam, stiripentol, talampanel, valrocemide, JZP-4, NS1209, PID and RWJ-333369. Updates on felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and new extended release oxcarbazepine formulations, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide and new extended release valproic acid formulations, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.

Management of epilepsy in pregnancy

Pregnancies in women with epilepsy need careful management, by both the medical and obstetric teams, owing to the increased incidence of complications and adverse outcomes of pregnancy. By the time a pregnant woman with epilepsy presents, the major fetal organs are significantly formed, apart from the brain, and the development of which may be impaired by the maternal intake of valproate. Women of child-bearing age need to be counseled and told to seek advice regarding their anticonvulsant antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy, should they wish to become pregnant. All major AEDs are teratogenic, but the main risk to the developing fetus appears to be when the mother is on polytherapy, especially if sodium valproate forms part of the combination. Other issues that need to be discussed include the methods and consequences of prenatal screening, genetics of seizure disorder, folic acid and vitamin K supplements, labor, breast feeding and care and safety of the child.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.