Childhood intussusception: US-guided hydrostatic reduction

Suspected intussusception: is ultrasound a reliable diagnostic aid?

BACKGROUND

Infantile intussusception often presents with symptoms more common to less dangerous conditions, and diagnosis must be established as early as possible. Clinical diagnosis is often wrong and contrast enema is invasive. Sonography is painless and harmless and if it provides a reliable method of diagnosis or exclusion of intussusception, diagnostic delay will be avoided.

METHODS

In the John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, between 1993 and 1994, the names of all children referred for abdominal sonography with a degree of suspicion of intussusception were recorded, and the histories were subsequently reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were studied. Forty-one patients had no sonographic evidence of intussusception and nine patients had positive findings. None of the 41 patients who had negative sonograms proved to have intussusception. The nine patients who had positive findings were subjected to air enema. In two patients the sonographic diagnosis was proved wrong. In the other seven patients it was confirmed. Thus there were two false positives and no false negatives.

CONCLUSION

Sonography is a reliable aid to the clinical diagnosis of intussusception.

Nonfluoroscopic reduction of intussusception by air enema

Intussusception is a common pediatric condition in China. Hydrostatic reduction with barium sulfate or pneumatic reduction using air and fluoroscopy has become the standard method in most centers throughout the world. To avoid radiation exposure, reduction without fluoroscopic confirmation was studied. Between 1981 and 1985 a total of 224 children were diagnosed and treated for intussusception. The diagnosis was made correctly on clinical grounds in 184 cases; in 40 cases ultrasonography confirmed the clinical diagnosis. Pressurized air reduction was successful in 217 patients (96.9%); seven patients required operative reduction. Ultrasonograms of the abdomen supported the diagnosis in 40 patients and confirmed subsequent reduction. This experience demonstrates that childhood intussusception can be reduced using pneumatic pressure without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation.

Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children--a comparison of perforation with barium and air

This paper compares the effects on patients of perforation with barium and with air during attempted intussusception reduction by reviewing the clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological findings and sequelae in seven children who received barium and seven who received air. In both groups perforation occurred in infants under 6 months of age (with one exception) with a long duration of symptoms. All patients with barium enema required resection of bowel whereas only four with air enema required resection. Anesthetic times were longer in those patients with barium perforation in whom the intussusception did not move and there was a large leak. The patients with perforation due to air had a shorter hospital stay with decreased morbidity compared to those with perforation due to barium. Perforation occurred through areas of transmural necrosis in a minority of patients in each group. Perforations through normal bowel and shear injury (with air enema) indicate that increased pressure during the examination is an important factor in some patients. Because perforation with air is so much easier to deal with surgically and the children do better clinically, there is a tendency for some to consider perforation with air an inconsequential situation. However, a potential rare complication with this technique is tension pneumoperitoneum. Keeping this in mind, we continue to use air as the contrast of choice because the procedure in our hands is a safe, quicker and easier technique and we have achieved a substantial improvement in reduction rates. Overall reported perforation rates with air enema compare favourably with those due to barium enema.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Postoperative small-bowel intussusception in children with cancer

The clinical and imaging features of small-bowel intussusception as a complication of abdominal surgery are not well known. Diagnosis may be delayed because symptoms mimic common postoperative complaints. In pediatric cancer patients, the side effects of chemotherapy and symptoms related to the primary malignancy may also obscure the diagnosis. We report the clinical and radiographic features of eight children undergoing evaluation and treatment for solid tumors who developed small-bowel intussusception following laparotomy. These children represent 2.2% of all children and adolescents who underwent laparotomy at a pediatric cancer research and treatment center during a 13-year period. With prompt diagnosis and intervention, morbidity and mortality from this rare but life-threatening postoperative complication can be avoided.

Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception under US guidance

The current nonoperative management of ileocolic intussusception includes hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction, both performed under fluoroscopic monitoring. Recently, a new technique--ultrasound-guided reduction--replaced the conventional approach in our institution. Over a 20-month period, 46 intussusceptions were diagnosed sonographically in 40 patients. In all cases, reduction was attempted under ultrasound guidance by means of a normal saline enema. In 42 cases (91%) reduction was successful and only four patients had to be operated (two resections, two manual reductions). Complications did not occur. This technique permits distinct visualization of the entire process, providing a clear and detailed echogram of the fluid-filled large and small intestine. We established the following definite criteria of reduction: disappearance of the target, demonstration of the ileocecal valve, visualization of the fluid reflux, and fluid filling of small bowel loops. The presented technique for the reduction of intussusception without radiation exposure is reliable and safe, and appears to be one of the most promising methods for the nonoperative treatment of ileocolic intussusception.

Variations in the radiological management of intussusception: results of a postal survey

A survey of the radiological reduction of intussusception in a selection of British hospitals was performed using a questionnaire. Replies were received from radiologists working in 51 district general hospitals and 25 teaching hospitals or specialist paediatric institutions. Most district general hospitals still use barium as the sole method of reduction of intussusception. Most teaching hospitals and specialist paediatric units have changed to a pneumatic method. The contra-indications, details of patient preparation and technical details of each method varied considerably.

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of juvenile colonic polyps

To reduce the risks of air-contrast barium enemas and colonoscopy, we studied the use of saline enemas for ultrasonographic examination of children with rectal bleeding. Thirty-nine children, from 2 years 8 months to 8 years 3 months of age, were examined. Juvenile colonic polyps were ultrasonographically demonstrated and histologically confirmed in 25 children; all the polyps were solitary and pedunculated, and were located in the splenic flexure in 3 children, the descending colon in 6, the sigmoid colon in 12, and the rectum in 4. Ultrasonographic findings by hydrocolonic ultrasonography were identical to those obtained by immersion ultrasonography of removed specimens. Hypoechoic areas within more hyperechoic polyps were shown histologically to be dilated glandular canals. The 14 children in whom no abnormal ultrasonographic findings were shown had no further rectal bleeding after resuming regular defecation, and 5 of these 14 had negative colonoscopic findings. No adverse reactions were noted in any child during or after the saline enema examination. We conclude that ultrasonographic examination with a saline enema is a safe and accurate method of assessing children with rectal bleeding, especially for the diagnosis of juvenile colonic polyps.

Ultrasonography is accurate enough for the diagnosis of intussusception

For more than 10 years the authors have been using ultrasonography to confirm clinically suspected intussusception without performing a contrast enema. The aim of this study is to review this diagnostic policy. Between 1980 and 1989, 163 children who, on clinical examination and plain abdominal radiographs were suspected of having intussusception, underwent ultrasonography to confirm the diagnosis. In 33 children, ultrasonography did not show intussusception; of the remaining 130 children, intussusception was diagnosed in 128. In two children in whom intussusception was noted subsequently, the diagnosis was not established on ultrasound. Thus, ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 98.5% and a specificity of 100% in the diagnosis of intussusception. It is a quick, simple, noninvasive method to diagnose intussusception, with high accuracy. The role of contrast enema is limited to therapeutic application.

The post-reduction donut sign

A donut-shaped intestinal structure in the lower right abdomen, observed during abdominal ultrasound investigation following nonoperative intussusception reduction, may create a diagnostic problem concerning differentiation from a residual or recurrent intussusception or underlying small bowel disease. In 30 cases of ileocolic intussusception an abdominal ultrasound examination was performed after reduction, the success of which was proven by radiological and clinical criteria. More than half of the examinations showed an aperistaltic "donut" in the ileocecal region which was similar to the target sign commonly seen in intussusception. Differentiation was possible according to the following two criteria: first, the diameter of the donut was smaller than that of the original target sign seen in these patients. Second, the donut consisted of a broad hypoechoic rim and an echogenic center, whereas the target was normally composed of multiple concentric rings. One third of the patients showed localized thickening of the walls of the distal ileal loops which did not cause diagnostic problems. All of the suspicious intestinal structures disappeared within the first 5 days following reduction. It is our opinion that the post-reduction donut correlates with significant edema of the ileocecal valve and does not represent a mechanical lead point or persisting residual intussusception.

Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: clinical experience and factors affecting outcome

Between 1987 and 1992, 54 patients (32 male, 22 female) underwent 62 attempts at pneumatic reduction of intussusception. The mean age at presentation was 12.5 months (range 2.5 to 4 years 4 months). A retrospective review of all cases was performed to identify success rate and factors affecting it. Successful reduction was achieved in 46 cases (74%). One case was complicated by perforation and four cases (7%) by early recurrence. Patients with failed pneumatic reduction were more likely than those with successful reduction to have: (1) long duration of symptoms; (2) bleeding per rectum; (3) small bowel obstruction. Among the 16 cases of failed reduction, surgical findings were: five cases of ileo-ileo-colic intussusception, one with ileo-ileal, one with perforated ischaemic colon during air enema and one whose intussusception was found to be reduced at surgery. Three patients had lead points: Meckel's diverticula in two and a pinworm in one. Resection was required in three cases for non-viable bowel and in another two for the Meckel's diverticula. Pneumatic reduction of intussusception offers a high success rate with few complications. Performing an air enema earlier in the course of the disease may increase the chance of successful reduction.

Indications for laparotomy after hydrostatic reduction for intussusception

A criterion for successful hydrostatic reduction of intussusception is reflux into the terminal ileum. In our practice, absence of reflux into the terminal ileum is not an indication for laparotomy if the radiographic appearances suggest edema of the ileocecal valve. The aim of this study was to validate our approach. We reviewed the case notes of patients with a diagnosis of intussusception (n = 107; age 11.74 +/- 1.48 months; mean +/- SEM) treated from 1987 to 1991. Eleven required primary laparotomy for peritonitis. Ninety-six patients who had a contrast enema were studied. Edema of the ileocecal valve was defined as a persistent filling defect in the cecum after apparently complete hydrostatic reduction, without reflux of contrast into the distal small bowel. In 59 patients hydrostatic reduction was successful: 11 (18.6%) had edema of the ileocecal valve and no reflux contrast into the terminal ileum (group B). All improved clinically after the enema and needed no further treatment. In 37 patients hydrostatic reduction of the intussusception was unsuccessful and an operation was performed: 26 (70.3%) required manual reduction of the intussusception (group C) and 11 (29.7%) underwent bowel resection (group D). None of the patients with edema of ileocecal valve required further treatment or developed recurrent intussusception. In none of the patients who had an operation was the intussusception found to have been reduced by the contrast enema. There were no deaths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Peritoneal fluid in children with intussusception: its sonographic detection and relationship to successful reduction

A retrospective review of the abdominal/pelvic ultrasound (US) examinations in 21 consecutive children with intussusception proven on barium enema was performed to determine what is the incidence of US detected peritoneal fluid in this population and to see if the rate of reduction was different in this subset. Twelve of the 21 children (57%) had free fluid demonstrated with US. Eight of these 12 (67%) had successful reduction. Six of the nine children (67%) without free fluid were also successfully reduced.