Myocardial fibrosis in constrictive pericarditis. Electrocardiographic and pathologic observations

Right atrial thrombosis: association with constrictive pericarditis

We report a 73-year-old man with right atrial thrombosis associated with both constrictive pericarditis and persistent sinus rhythms of the heart who successfully underwent thrombectomy and pericardiectomy.

Constrictive pericarditis with electrocardiographic evidence of right ventricular hypertrophy

We report the findings in a patient with constrictive pericarditis who had ECGs resembling right ventricular hypertrophy without right ventricular pressure overload, and we provide a possible explanation for the cause of this abnormality. Right ventriculography demonstrated a dilated and hyperkinetic outflow tract and compressed free wall with calcified pericardium. The derangement of the configuration of the right ventricle was considered to be the genesis of this electrocardiographic abnormality.

Constrictive pericarditis: techniques for differential diagnosis

Although the incidence of constrictive pericarditis is low, the increasing number of patients receiving chronic dialysis, aggressive radiotherapy, or cardiovascular surgery has caused an increase in the iatrogenic incidence. The most common symptoms are dyspnea, fatigue, weight gain, peripheral edema, and abdominal swelling and discomfort. They may be present for years before the diagnosis is made. Physical examination, x-ray studies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and angiography are all helpful in the differential diagnosis. Pericardiectomy, the only treatment, has a success rate of up to 90%. Untreated, the condition progresses to an incapacitating state.

Technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams in pericardial disease

Technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate (99mTc-PYP) myocardial scintigrams were obtained in 35 acute pericarditis and in three chronic constrictive pericarditis patients. Thirteen of 35 acute pericarditis patients (37%) and one of three chronic constrictive pericarditis patients (33%) had abnormal scintigrams (a diffuse pattern in eight patients and a regional pattern in six patients). Of the 17 acute pericarditis patients with classic ST-segment changes of acute pericarditis, 10 (56%) had abnormal scintigrams compared to three of 17 patients (18%) without these ECG changes (P less than 0.02). These data indicate that pericardial disease may cause an abnormal scintigram. Therefore, one must rule out pericardial disease before concluding that a positive scintigram is due to acute myocardial infarction.

Elevation of plasma MB creatine kinase and the development of new Q waves in association with pericarditis

A 64-year-old woman with an acute exacerbation of chronic relapsing pericarditis had initial clinical and ECG features that were consistent with an acute anterior myocardial infarction. Transient Q waves were observed in the precordial leads, and she also exhibited elevated plasma MB creatine kinase (MB CK) activity. However, the overall clinical and laboratory data, including angiographic and radionuclide studies, suggest that the myocardial damage was secondary to pericarditis per se, rather than ischemic myocardial infarction. This case emphasizes that Q waves and elevated MB CK activity can be seen in association with pericarditis, and this must be differentiated from myocardial infarction secondary to coronary artery disease.

Cardiac amyloidosis, contrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy

Cardiac amyloidosis is not characterized by a single hemodynamic pattern. Some of the cases present the clinical findings of restrictive cardiomyopathy and in these differentiation from constrictive pericarditis remains difficult in spite of the introduction of techniques designed to assess myocardial contractility and ventricular diastolic compliance. The clinical features and the demonstration of left ventricular diastolic pressure greater than right remain the most useful means of distinguishing restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis. In other cases of cardiac amyloidosis the diastolic pressure is elevated throughout diastole and ventricular ejectile ability is lost. These cases do not simulate constrictive pericarditis and should not be classified as restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Usefulness of systolic time intervals in differential diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy

Systolic time intervals in 15 patients with constrictive pericarditis and seven patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy were compared in order to assess their value in the differential diagnosis of the two disorders. Clinical examination had failed to make the distinction. Right heart catheterization was helpful in diagnosing restriction but failed to differentiate patients with constrictive pericarditis from those with restrictive cardiomyopathy. The systolic time intervals clearly separated the two groups. The PEP/LVET was normal in all patients with constrictive pericarditis (0.34 +/- 0.01) and abnormal in all patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (0.70 +/- 0.09, P less than 0.001). In 13 patients (five with restrictive cardiomyopathy and eight with constrictive pericarditis) the results of quantitative left ventricular angiocardiography were available. A high correlation (r=-0.90, P less than 0.01) between the PEP/LVET and the ejection fraction confirmed the validity of the PEP/LVET as a measure of left ventricular performance in these patients. Thus the systolic time intervals clearly distinguished between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy and are a reliable non-invasive technique for making the difficult differential diagnosis.

Systolic time intervals in constrictive pericarditis. A study before and after digitalis

Systolic time intervals were studied in 9 patients with documented constrictive pericarditis before and 15 to 20 minutes after intravenous administration of peruvoside (a quick acting digitalis-like glycoside) to determine underlying myocardial dysfunction. Data were compared with those of similarly studied normal subjects and patients with known myocardial dysfunction. Left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI) decreased in normal subjects (P less than 0.01) and in most patients with constrictive pericarditis, and increased marginally in those with myocardial dysfunction (NS) after peruvoside administration. Pre-ejection period index (PEPI) shortened significantly (P less than 0.01) after peruvoside in normal subjects and in patients with myocardial failure, but not in constrictive pericarditis. Likewise the predicted ejection fraction was insignificantly altered in constrictive pericarditis but significantly so (P less than 0.01) in myocardial failure and normal subjects. The response of one patient with constrictive pericarditis to parenteral peruvoside administration was similar to that seen in patients with myocardial failure. This patient had a delayed recovery after pericardiectomy. PEPI/LVETI ratio and ejection fraction were also abnormal in other patients with constrictive pericarditis when compared to normal subjects. Such abnormalities and the unusual response of some patients to administration of peruvoside may reflect underlying myocardial dysfunction in patients with constrictive pericarditis. However, it is possible that the rigid pericardium also contributes to these abnormalities to a varying extent. Systolic time indices and their response to digitalis appear to be a useful, atraumatic method for detecting underlying myocardial dysfunction in patients with constrictive pericarditis.