Cryoballoon Versus Open Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority FreezeAF Study

News from the Cold Chamber: Clinical Experiences of POLARx versus Arctic Front Advance for Single-Shot Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Cryoballoon (CB)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) represents a cornerstone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a novel balloon-guided single shot device (POLARx, Boston Scientific) was designed. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety and characteristics of the novel CB system with the established one (Arctic Front Advance (Pro), AFA, Medtronic). A total number of 596 patients undergoing CB-guided ablation for AF were included. 65 patients (65.0 ± 11.6, 31% female) undergoing PVI with the POLARx were compared to a cohort of 531 consecutive patients (63.0 ± 27.9, 25% female) treated with AFA. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients (n = 596, 100%). Total procedure duration (POLARx 113.3 ± 23.2 min, AFA 100.9 ± 21.3 min; p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (POLARx 10.5 ± 5.9 min, AFA 4.8 ± 3.6 min; p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the POLARx group. The POLARx balloon achieved significantly lower nadir temperatures (POLARx −57.7 ± 0.9 °C, AFA −45.1 ± 2.6 °C; p < 0.001) and a significantly higher percentage of pulmonary veins successfully isolated with the first freeze (p = 0.027 *). One major complication occurred in the POLARx (2%) and three (1%) in the AFA group. Both ablation systems are comparably safe and effective. AF ablation utilizing the POLARx system is associated with longer procedure and fluoroscopy times as well as lower nadir temperatures.

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in relation to the Patients' Age: Results from a Large Real-World Multicenter Observational Project

BACKGROUND

The real-world efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in particularly young and elderly patients are still under debate. The aim of the analysis was to investigate the effect of age on the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA).

METHODS

2,534 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by way of CBA for paroxysmal or persistent drug-resistant and symptomatic AF. The population was divided into age quartiles for evaluation, including (1) <53 years, (2) ≥53 and <61 years, (3) ≥61 and <67 years, and (4) ≥67 years. Furthermore, outcomes were analyzed in patients <41 years, ≥41 and ≤74, and >74 years old. Procedural data and complications were collected, and atrial fibrillation recurrences were evaluated during follow-up.

RESULTS

Procedural-related complications (4.1%) were similar in the four subgroups according to age. At the 12-month follow-up, freedom from AF recurrence was 79.2%, 77.4%, 76.8%, and 75.2% (p=0.21), respectively (with increasing age). At 24-month follow-up, similar incidences of AF recurrence were observed in the four subgroups. When the sample was arbitrarily divided into the three age groups, a higher rate of recurrence was observed in older patients with regard to long-term follow-up (freedom from AF recurrence was 71.8% and 40.9%, respectively, at 12 and 24-month follow-up). In the univariate and multivariate analysis, age did not result in a significant predictor of AF recurrence during follow-up; however, a trend toward higher AF recurrences rates in patients ≥67 years was observed.

CONCLUSION

The data demonstrated a high degree of safety during CBA across all patient ages. Procedural performance and complications were similar between different ages; AF recurrences seem to be more frequent in patients over 74 years.

Efficacy and Safety of Nepcell STM in Achieving Hemostasis After Removal of a 15-Fr Femoral Venous Sheath in Patients Undergoing Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Hemostasis at the femoral venous access site after cryoballoon ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is often prolonged because of aggressive anticoagulation and the use of 15-Fr-caliber sheaths. The Nepcell S^TM (NC) is a newly developed hemostatic pad made of fibrosed calcium alginate extracted from natural seaweed. The calcium ions from the NC accelerate the clotting cascade. This single-center randomized clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the NC in patients undergoing CA for AF.

Methods and Results: In all, 62 patients undergoing CA for non-valvular paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to either the NC or control group. The primary endpoints of this study were time to hemostasis, internal hemorrhage, and rebleeding. Secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay (LOS) and vascular complications at 1 month. The time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in NC than control group (mean [±SD] 377±216 vs. 505±241 s; P=0.031). The frequency of internal hemorrhaging (6% vs. 37%; P=0.003) and rebleeding (0% vs. 13%; P=0.033) was lower in the NC than control group, contributing to a decreased LOS in the NC group (3.56±0.67 vs. 4.23±0.73 days; P<0.001). There were no NC-related vascular complications at the 1-month echographic examination.

Conclusions: The use of NC was associated with a shorter hemostasis time and fewer bleeding complications in patients undergoing CA for AF, leading to a shorter LOS.

Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: A real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

There are limited data describing the experience of radiofrequency (RF) vs. cryoballoon (CB) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) among elderly patients in the United States.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥75 years of age undergoing index RF vs. CB ablation between January 2014 and May 2020 at our center. The choice of ablation technique was left to the operator's discretion. Major complications and efficacy, defined as freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) lasting ≥30 s after one year of follow-up, were assessed in patients with index RF vs. CB ablation.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 186 patients, the median age was 78 (76-81) years, 54.8% were men, and 39.2% had persistent AF. The median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 4 (3-4), while the median duration of AF was 3 (1-7) years. The majority (n = 112, 60.2%) underwent RF ablation. The median procedure time was significantly lower in CB group (197 vs 226.5 min, p=<0.01). The incidence of complications was similar in the two sub-groups (RF: 1.8% vs. CB: 2.7%, p = 0.67). Similarly, arrhythmia-free survival rate on antiarrhythmic drugs at 1-year follow-up remained statistically comparable (63.4% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.33) between patients receiving RF vs. CB ablation.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of RF vs. CB ablation for AF remained comparable in our cohort of patients older than 75 years. CB ablation was associated with a shorter procedure time.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: Systematic review and a meta-analysis

AIMS

Catheter ablation (CA) is established therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there is a limited understanding of CA in elderly patients. We studied the long-term efficacy and periprocedural safety of radiofrequency and cryoballoon CA for elderly patients with AF.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched through April 2021 to investigate the comparative outcomes between elderly and non-elderly patients who underwent CA for AF. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were AF recurrence and procedure-related complications, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed by procedure type of CA.

RESULTS

The search identified 20 observational studies with 110,606 patients, including 8009 elderly patients (7.2%). The risk of AF recurrence was not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-2.00; p = .10, I²  = 70%). However, relative to the non-elderly, elderly patients had significantly higher major complications (risk ratio [RR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.54], p < .01, I²  = 0%) and overall complications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00-1.57; p = .05, I²  = 56%) with higher cerebrovascular events (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.25-2.25; p = < .01, I²  = 0%). Subgroup analysis with cryoballoon CA showed that procedure-related complications in elderly patients were similar to those in non-elderly patients but not with radiofrequency CA.

CONCLUSIONS

CA for AF in elderly patients has comparable long-term efficacy compared to that in non-elderly patients; however, the incidence of procedure-related complications were higher in elderly patients. Cryoballoon CA did not confer a higher procedure-related risk in elderly patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Cryoablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Episodes of <24 h Duration: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Background: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is closely related to pathophysiologic processes and clinical outcomes. However, it is uncertain whether cryoablation of pulmonary veins isolation is effective and safe for patients with symptomatic and drug refractory AF episodes of <24-h duration.

Methods: The patients were designed into Group A (253 patients with paroxysmal AF episodes of <24-h duration) and Group B (253 patients with paroxysmal AF lasting for 24 h or longer) on a 1:1 basis by identical propensity scores. Mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and complications relevant to the cryoablation procedure were compared, and recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia was analyzed for clinical independent predictors.

Results: The rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was 21.74% in Group A and 30.04% in Group B, respectively (P = 0.042). At 12-month follow-up from the procedure, lower incidences of stroke/TIA endpoint of the patients were observed in Group A compared with Group B by Kaplan–Meier analysis [HR 0.34 (0.13–0.87), P = 0.025]. No significant differences in mortality and complications relevant to the cryoablation procedure were observed between Group A and Group B. Moreover, adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that <24-h paroxysmal AF type (HR 0.644, 95% CI: 0.455–0.913, P = 0.014) and left atrium diameter (LAD) (>40 mm) (HR 1.696, 95% CI: 1.046–2.750, P = 0.032) were independently associated with the incidence of recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in the study.

Conclusion: Our findings indicated that <24-h paroxysmal AF type was obviously associated with an increased success rate of cryoablation and reduced incidence of stroke/TIA during the follow-up period. Therefore, there is superior effectiveness and similar safety in patients with AF episodes of <24-h duration compared with patients with longer paroxysmal AF duration.

[Practical guide for safe and efficient cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation : Practical procedure, tips and tricks]

In the current guidelines on treatment of atrial fibrillation, cryoballoon-based catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is recommended in addition to radiofrequency ablation and has become established as a standard procedure in the clinical routine of many centers for index pulmonary vein isolation. A safe, simplified and often durable pulmonary vein isolation can be achieved by a systematic approach. This review article provides a practical guide for all steps of cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation, including preprocedural preparation and postinterventional follow-up. Both cryoballoon systems currently available on the market are considered.

Cryoballoon Versus High-Power, Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Study

[Figure: see text].

Quality indicators for the care and outcomes of adults with atrial fibrillation

AIMS

To develop quality indicators (QIs) that may be used to evaluate the quality of care and outcomes for adults with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We followed the ESC methodology for QI development. This methodology involved (i) the identification of the domains of AF care for the diagnosis and management of AF (by a group of experts including members of the ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines Task Force for AF); (ii) the construction of candidate QIs (including a systematic review of the literature); and (iii) the selection of the final set of QIs (using a modified Delphi method). Six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF were identified: (i) Patient assessment (baseline and follow-up), (ii) Anticoagulation therapy, (iii) Rate control strategy, (iv) Rhythm control strategy, (v) Risk factor management, and (vi) Outcomes measures, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In total, 17 main and 17 secondary QIs, which covered all six domains of care for the diagnosis and management of AF, were selected. The outcome domain included measures on the consequences and treatment of AF, as well as PROMs.

CONCLUSION

This document defines six domains of AF care (patient assessment, anticoagulation, rate control, rhythm control, risk factor management, and outcomes), and provides 17 main and 17 secondary QIs for the diagnosis and management of AF. It is anticipated that implementation of these QIs will improve the quality of AF care.

Calorimetric analysis of ice onset temperature during cryoablation: a model approach to identify early predictors of effective applications

Aim of the present study is to analyze thermal events occurring during cryoablation. Different bovine liver samples underwent freezing cycles at different cooling rate (from 0.0075 to 25 K/min). Ice onset temperature and specific latent heat capacity of the ice formation process were measured according to differential scanning calorimetry signals. A computational model of the thermal events occurring during cryoablation was compiled using Neumann's analytical solution. Latent heat (#1 = 139.8 ± 7.4 J/g, #2 = 147.8 ± 7.9 J/g, #3 = 159.0 ± 4.1 J/g) of all liver samples was independent of the ice onset temperature, but linearly dependent on the water content. Ice onset temperature was proportional to the logarithm of the cooling rate in the range 5 ÷ 25 K/min (#3a = - 12.2 °C, #3b = - 16.2 °C, #3c = - 6.6 °C at 5K/min; #3a = - 16.5 °C, #3b = - 19.3 °C, #3c = - 11.6 °C at 25 K/min). Ice onset temperature was associated with both the way in which the heat involved into the phase transition was delivered and with the thermal gradient inside the tissue. Ice onset temperature should be evaluated in the early phase of the ablation to tailor cryoenergy delivery. In order to obtain low ice trigger temperatures and consequent low ablation temperatures a high cooling rate is necessary.

Technical and procedural comparison of two different cryoballoon ablation systems in patients with atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The aim was to report procedural and technical differences of a novel cryoballoon (NCB) ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared to the standard cryoballoon (SCB) catheter.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using the NCB and the SCB were included. Procedural parameters, technical differences, acute efficacy, and safety are reported.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (age 66 ± 10 years, ejection fraction 57 ± 10%, left atrial volume index 40 ± 6 ml/m²) were studied. With the NCB, 156 of 158 PVs (99%) were isolated compared to isolation of 159 of 159 PVs (100%) with the SCB. The median number of freezes in the NCB and the SCB group was 6 (IQR 5-8) and 5 (IQR 4-7), respectively (p = 0.051), with 73% and 71% of the PVs isolated with a single freeze, respectively. Nadir temperature and temperature at isolation were - 59 ± 6 °C and - 45 ± 17 °C in the NCB group and - 46 ± 7 °C and - 32 ± 23 °C in the SCB group, respectively (both p < 0.001) with no difference in time to isolation (TTI). Procedural differences were observed for the total procedure time (84 ± 29 min in the NCB group and 65 ± 17 min in the SCB group, p = 0.003). There was a peri-procedural stroke in one patient in the NCB group. Differences in catheter design were observed that may account for the differences in temperature recordings and ice cap formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute efficacy and TTI were similar with the NCB compared to the SCB. Measured temperatures were lower with the NCB, most likely due to differences in catheter design.

Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is comparable to the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA‐Pro; Medtronic), but it is more compliant during freezing. We compared the procedural efficacy, biophysical parameters, and risk of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) between the two cryoballoons.

Methods

Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until June 1, 2021 for relevant studies comparing POLARx versus AFA‐Pro in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF.

Results

A total of four studies, involving 310 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups for outcomes regarding procedural efficacy: acute PVI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06 to 3.03; p = .40), procedure time (mean difference [MD]: 8.15 min; 95% CI: −8.09 to 24.39; p = .33), fluoroscopy time (MD: 1.32 min; 95% CI: −1.61 to 4.25; p = .38) and ablation time (MD: 1.00 min; 95% CI: −0.20 to 2.20; p = .10). The balloon nadir temperature was lower for all individual pulmonary veins (PV) in POLARx compared with AFA‐Pro (MD: −9.74°C, −9.98°C, −6.72°C, −7.76°C, for left superior PV, left inferior PV, right superior PV, and right inferior PV, respectively; all p < .001). The incidence of PNP was similar between groups (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.85; p = .72).

Conclusion

In AF patients undergoing PVI, POLARx and AFA‐Pro had a similar procedural efficacy. Balloon nadir temperatures were lower with POLARx, however, the incidence of PNP was similar.

Effectiveness and safety of a single freeze strategy of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: an EHRA systematic review and meta-analysis

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) performed using a single freeze strategy in comparison to an empiric double ('bonus') freeze strategy. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from inception to 12 July 2020, for prospective and retrospective studies of patients undergoing cryoballoon for paroxysmal or persistent AF comparing a single vs. bonus freeze strategy. The main outcome was atrial arrhythmia-free survival and eligible studies required at least 12 months of follow-up; the primary safety outcome was a composite of all complications. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Thirteen studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 10 observational studies) comprising 3163 patients were eligible for inclusion (64% males, 71.5% paroxysmal AF, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.3 ± 0.9). There was no significant difference in pooled effectiveness between single freeze strategy compared to double freeze strategy [relative risk (RR) 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.07; I2 = 0%]. Single freeze procedures were associated with a significantly lower adverse event rate (RR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.98; I2 = 0%) and shorter average procedure time (90 ± 27 min vs. 121 ± 36 min, P < 0.001). A trend for lower risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy was observed (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37-1.01; I2 = 0%). The quality of included studies was moderate/good, with no evidence of significant publication bias. Single freeze strategy for cryoballoon of AF is as effective as an empiric double ('bonus') freeze strategy while appearing safer and probably quicker (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158696).

Fluoroscopy and contrast media use in cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation using a novel imaging system

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using cryoballoon (CB) catheter is generally characterized by a high radiation and contrast media exposure. A new dielectric imaging system (KODEX-EPD imaging system) allows pulmonary vein (PV) occlusion assessment without dye use. The purpose of this study was to verify the feasibility of reducing the radiation and dye use during CB ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) using the new dielectric imaging system. In a retrospective, single center study, we enrolled 34 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF divided in two groups: 17 patients in Conventional Group underwent the procedure under fluoroscopy guidance before the new system introduction, while 17 patient in KODEX-EPD Group underwent the procedure under fluoroscopy and KODEX-EPD imaging system guidance. There were no differences in any clinical and anatomical characteristics between the two study groups. Overall procedure time was comparable between the two groups (69 [IQR 63-98] min in Conventional Group vs. 65 [IQR 58-74] min in KODEX-EPD Group, p = 0.16), while fluoroscopy time (8 [IQR 5-9] min vs. 11 [IQR 9-12] min, p = 0.014) and dye use (35 [IQR 28-45] ml vs. 70 [IQR 57-83] ml, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the KODEX-EPD Group. No 30-day complications were observed. At 12-month follow-up 7/37 (19%) patients had an atrial arrhythmias recurrence, without any difference between the two study groups (17.6% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.68). The use of a new dielectric imaging system allowed a significantly reduction in radiation exposure and dye use during CB ablation in patients with AF.

Newer generation cryoballoon vs. contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter in the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an effective treatment to control symptoms. The second generation cryoballoon (CB) was designed for more efficient and homogenous freeze. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheters using three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping with the use of contact-force radiofrequency (CF RF) technology has achieved good results in several studies.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of second-generation CB ablation in contrast to CF RF ablation in the ablation of paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

A total of 81 consecutive patients suffering from paroxysmal AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) either by the second generation cryoballoon (n = 44) or a contact force-sensing RF catheter (n = 37). The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals and Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS trust. Baseline data, procedural data and patient follow up-at 3, 6 and 12 months-were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53.8 ± 15 years in the CB group and 62.4 ± 12 years in the RF group, females representing 40.9% and 48.6% respectively. The baseline characteristics were comparable, but the CB group had less left atrial diameter and more left ventricular ejection fraction. The CB procedure was shorter (94.4 ± 39.3 vs. 140.8 ± 44.3 min, p < 0.0001), with longer fluoroscopy time (30 vs. 15.1 min, p = 0.047). Procedural complications were comparable between the two groups (CB 4.6%, CF RF 2.7%, p = 0.411). After 1 year, the recurrence rate in the CB group was similar to RF (27.3% vs. 27% respectively, p = 0.980).

CONCLUSION

Second-generation CB ablation of paroxysmal AF has similar efficacy and safety to contact force-sensing RF catheters, with shorter procedure times and more fluoroscopy.

Long-term course of phrenic nerve injury after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation

While phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) due to cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of atrial fibrillation (AF) was transient in most cases, no studies have reported the results of the long-term follow-up of PNP. This study aimed to summarize details and the results of long-term follow-up of PNP after cryoballoon ablation. A total of 511 consecutive AF patients who underwent cryoballoon ablation was included. During right-side PVI, the diaphragmatic compound motor action potential (CMAP) was reduced in 46 (9.0%) patients and PNP occurred in 29 (5.7%) patients (during right-superior PVI in 20 patients and right-inferior PVI in 9 patients). PNP occurred despite the absence of CMAP reduction in 0.6%. The PV anatomy, freezing parameters and the operator’s proficiency were not predictors of PNP. While PNP during RSPVI persisted more than 4 years in 3 (0.6%) patients, all PNP occurred during RIPVI recovered until one year after the ablation. However, there was no significant difference in the recovery duration from PNP between PNP during RSPVI and RIPVI. PNP occurred during cryoballoon ablation in 5.7%. While most patients recovered from PNP within one year after the ablation, PNP during RSPVI persisted more than 4 years in 0.6% of patients.

Comparison of procedural efficacy and biophysical parameters between two competing cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: Insights from an initial multicenter experience

INTRODUCTION

Recently a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx, Boston Scientific) became available for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. This cryoballoon is comparable with Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro, Medtronic), however, it maintains a constant balloon pressure. We compared the procedural efficacy and biophysical characteristics of both systems.

METHODS

One hundred and ten consecutive patients who underwent first-time cryoballoon ablation (POLARx: n = 57; AFA-Pro: n = 53) were included in this prospective cohort study.

RESULTS

Acute isolation was achieved in 99.8% of all pulmonary veins (POLARx: 99.5% vs. AFA-Pro: 100%, p = 1.00). Total procedure time (81 vs. 67 min, p < .001) and balloon in body time (51 vs. 35 min, p < .001) were longer with POLARx. After a learning curve, these times were similar. Cryoablation with POLARx was associated with shorter time to balloon temperature -30°C (27 vs. 31 s, p < .001) and -40°C (32 vs. 54 s, p < .001), lower balloon nadir temperature (-55°C vs. -47°C, p < .001), and longer thawing time till 0°C (16 vs. 9 s, p < .001). There were no differences in time-to-isolation (TTI; POLARx: 45 s vs. AFA-Pro 43 s, p = .441), however, POLARx was associated with a lower balloon temperature at TTI (-46°C vs. -37°C, p < .001). Factors associated with acute isolation differed between groups. The incidence of phrenic nerve palsy was comparable (POLARx: 3.5% vs. AFA-Pro: 3.7%).

CONCLUSION

The novel cryoballoon is comparable to AFA-Pro and requires only a short learning curve to get used to the slightly different handling. It was associated with faster cooling rates and lower balloon temperatures but TTI was similar to AFA-Pro.

Importance of the length of the myocardial sleeve in the superior vena cava in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation (PVAI) has proven to be a useful strategy for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) worldwide. However, non-PV foci, especially from the superior vena cava (SVC), play an important role in initiating and maintaining AF.

METHODS

In all, 427 consecutive patients with non-valvular AF who were admitted to our hospitals to undergo RFCA of AF using an EnSite™ system were evaluated. The length from the top of the sinus node to the top of the myocardial sleeve of SVC (L-SVC), longer and shorter diameter of SVC of 1 cm above of junction of right atrium and SVC, and local activation time (LAT) of SVC were measured. Then, the SVC firing was evaluated by an intravenous administration of isoproterenol and adenosine triphosphate.

RESULTS

L-SVC, longer and shorter diameter of SVC, and LAT of SVC were significantly longer in the SVC firing group than non-SVC firing group (P < .05). Moreover, in accordance with the L-SVC, the frequency of the SVC firing significantly increased (P < .001). A univariate analysis and multivariate statistical analysis revealed that L-SVC longer than 37.0 mm (odds ratio 6.39) and longer diameter of SVC (odds ratio 6.78) were independent risk factors for SVC firing in patients with AF who underwent RFCA of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of these findings, L-SVC longer than 37.0 mm longer diameter SVC longer than 17.0 mm may be one of the important predictors of SVC firing in patients with AF.

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation as a standard approach for interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation. A review and a practical guide to an effective and safe procedure

Since the cryoballoon was introduced into clinical practice, approximately half a million patients have undergone a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using this tool throughout the world. This single-shot technique makes the pulmonary vein isolation procedure easier and has the potential to expand access to the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), eventually leading to a reduction of the AF-related disease burden. Several studies and metanalyses have assessed the acute and long-term efficacy of cryoballoon-based PVI. The reported success rate of PV isolation during the procedure is about 98%. Despite this, the long-term effectiveness of the procedure (AF free survival) assessed at 1 year after the ablation is in the range of 70-82%. The AF-free survival rate significantly depends on the clinical characteristics of the studied group and the presence of risk factors, especially the type of AF (paroxysmal vs. persistent), LA size and the presence of heart failure. For a safe and effective procedure the electrophysiologist should be aware of all minute details of the procedure including several tricks developed by the most experienced operators and the pre-procedural and post-procedural management recommendations. Detailed knowledge of complications of cryoballoon (CB)-based ablation is mandatory. This review concentrates on the practical aspects and recommendations for a cryoballoon ablation procedure. The review is based on the authors' experience, including 800 procedures performed over 11 years with a low complication rate, and is presented within the context of the literature.

Keeping it Simple: Balloon Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy

Atrial fibrillation is a common disease of increasing prevalence. Catheter ablation has evolved into an established therapeutic option that mainly aims to electrically isolate the pulmonary veins from atrial myocardium. The traditional method comprises point-by-point radiofrequency current ablation guided by electroanatomical mapping and has proven to be effective and safe in experienced hands. However, this approach is technically highly demanding and associated with a long learning curve, limiting its widespread utilization. To address these shortcomings, simplified ablation tools for pulmonary vein isolation are needed. In this context, balloon devices promise to ease the procedure by approaching the entire orifice of a targeted pulmonary vein in a single maneuver. This requires less catheter manipulation in the left atrium and often allows ablation of a large volume of tissue with a single application of ablative energy. Two balloon devices-one using cryoenergy, the other laser energy-have already been established in clinical routine and have demonstrated noninferiority when compared with radiofrequency ablation in large randomized trials. More balloon devices are on the verge of being introduced into clinical practice and bear the potential to expand the interventional electrophysiologist's armamentarium when treating atrial fibrillation. The authors review the use of the established balloon devices available for atrial fibrillation ablation and provide a detailed outlook on upcoming balloon technologies, including 3 different balloons utilizing radiofrequency energy as well as a novel cryoballoon.

Clinical outcomes of cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Impact of intraprocedural heart rhythm

BACKGROUND

The current study sought to assess the impact of the intraprocedural heart rhythm (sinus rhythm [SR] vs. atrial fibrillation [AF]) on acute procedural characteristics, durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and long-term clinical outcomes of cryoballoon (CB) ablation.

METHODS

A total of 195 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 136) or persistent AF (n = 59) underwent CB-based PVI. Ablation procedures were either performed in SR (SR group; n = 147) or during AF (AF group; n = 48). Persistent AF was more frequent in the AF group than in the SR group (62% vs. 20%). All other patient baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups.

RESULTS

The nadir temperature during the CB applications was significantly lower in the AF group than in patients in the SR group (-49 [interquartile range, -44; -54]°C vs. -47 [-42; -52]°C, p = 0.002). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times as well as the rate of real-time recordings were not different between the two groups. Repeat ablation for the treatment of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was performed in 60 patients (SR: 44 [30%] patients; AF: 16 [33%] patients), with a trend towards a lower rate of pulmonary vein reconnections in the AF group (p = 0.07). There was no difference in 3-year arrhythmia-free survival (p = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoballoon-based PVI during AF results in lower nadir balloon temperatures and a trend towards a higher durability of PVI as compared to procedures performed in SR. The rate of real-time PVI recordings was not affected by the intraprocedural heart rhythm.

Are routine cryoballoon procedural characteristics predictive of atrial arrhythmia recurrence in the long term?

BACKGROUND

Cryoballoon ablation is an effective procedure to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, AF recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up is approximately 20% despite improvements in ablation technique.

AIM

To find factors predictive of AF recurrence following a first pulmonary vein isolation procedure using a second-generation cryoballoon (PVI-2CB).

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective, single-centre study. From June 2012 to April 2017, all patients who had a PVI-2CB procedure and a scheduled follow-up at Rouen University Hospital were included. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia (AA) recurrence (e.g. AF, flutter or tachycardia), considering a blanking period of 2 months following the procedure. Secondary endpoints were procedural variables for each pulmonary vein (successful isolation, time to disconnection, total cryoballoon application time, number of cryoballoon applications, level of occlusion during cryoballoon application leading to successful disconnection and lowest temperature reached during successful cryoballoon application), occurrence of redo procedures, use of antiarrhythmic drugs and adverse events.

RESULTS

The initial population consisted of 239 patients; six were excluded for lack of procedural variable data, giving an analysed population of 233 patients. The AA recurrence rate was 36.9% (mean follow-up 25±14 months). Mean time to AA recurrence was 10±12 months. No procedural variable was found to be predictive of AA recurrence. Only major left atrial enlargement (defined as diameter>50mm or left atrial area>30cm² or left atrial volume>50mL/m²) was predictive (odds ratio 2.70, 95% confidence interval 1.54-4.72; P=0.001). Forty-one patients had redo procedures (17.6% of analysed population); in this subgroup, 75.6% had at least one pulmonary vein reconnected, mainly the right inferior pulmonary vein.

CONCLUSIONS

At long-term follow-up, up to one-third of patients had AA recurrence after PVI-2CB. Important atrial remodelling was the only factor predictive of AA recurrence, whereas no procedural variable was found to be predictive.

Current Management Strategies in Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Literature

Heart Failure (HF) and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) are common diseases which lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Each disease can be a challenge to treat clinically, especially when they present together. We performed a review of the literature including clinical trials, metanalyses, and guidelines regarding the management of patients with HF and AF. This review describes the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind each disease state, their associated prognosis, and epidemiologic features. Strategies for prevention of stroke in patients with AF, including use of novel oral anticoagulants as well as prevention of the development of AF are discussed. We review the medical and catheter-based therapies for AF and present an original algorithm for the management of AF in patients with HF.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: current indications and evolving technologies

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has emerged as an important rhythm-control strategy and is by far the most common cardiac ablation procedure performed worldwide. Current guidelines recommend the procedure in symptomatic patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who are refractory or intolerant to antiarrhythmic drugs. The procedure might also be considered as a first-line approach in selected asymptomatic patients. Data from large registries indicate that AF ablation might reduce mortality and the risk of heart failure and stroke, but evidence from randomized controlled trials is mixed. Pulmonary vein isolation using point-by-point radiofrequency or with the cryoballoon remains the cornerstone technique in AF ablation. Additional atrial ablation can be performed in patients with persistent AF, but its benefits are largely unproven. Technological advances in the past decade have focused on achieving durable vein isolation, reducing procedure duration and improving safety. Numerous exciting new technologies are in various stages of development. In this Review, we discuss the relevant data to support the recommended and evolving indications for catheter ablation of AF, describe the different ablation techniques, and highlight the latest advances in technology that aim to improve its safety and efficacy. We also discuss lifestyle modification strategies to improve ablation outcomes.

Second-generation cryoballoon vs. contact-force sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

It is imperative to understand the influence of second-generation cryoballoon (CB-2) and contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation (CF-RF) on clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF). This updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the efficacy and safety of CB-2 vs. CF-RF in patients with AF.

METHODS

RCTs on the use of CB-2 vs. CF-RF in patients with AF were included. The primary outcome was the recurrence of AF, and the key secondary outcomes included serious complications, acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), procedure duration, and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

A total of 261 articles were identified, and five studies with a total of 845 participants were included in the study. A total of 93% of participants had paroxysmal AF, 7% of participants had persistent AF, and none of participants had permanent AF. There were 499 participants in the CB-2 arm and 346 in the CF-RF arm. AF recurrence was comparable in the CB-2 group (30.3%) and the CF-RF group (29.2%) (OR = 0.93; 95%CI = 0.56-1.54; P = 0.79; I² = 48%). There were no statistical differences in acute PVI (P = 0.92; I² = 0%) and serious complications (P = 0.87; I² = 47%) between the two groups. The procedure duration was shorter in the CB-2 group than in the CF-RF group (MD = - 13.39; 95%CI = - 15.58, - 7.19; P < 0.0001; I² = 59%).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that CB-2 and CF-RF had comparable recurrences of AF and similar incidences of serious complications in AF patients during the ablation process.

Comparative efficacy and safety of catheter ablation interventions for atrial fibrillation: comprehensive network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been the cornerstone of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, it remains a complex and time-consuming procedure. Many novel AF catheter ablation (CA) techniques have been introduced, but whether they represent valuable alternatives remains controversial. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of different CA interventions.

METHODS

We systematically searched several databases (Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov ) from inception to March, 2020. The primary outcomes of interest were freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) and procedure-related complications; secondary outcomes included procedure time and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

Finally, 33 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 4801 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were found among the different interventions in terms of primary efficacy or safety outcomes. PVAC was most likely to have the shortest procedure time (Prbest = 61.5%) and nMARQ the shortest fluoroscopy time (Prbest = 60.6%); compared with conventional irrigated RF (IRF) ablation, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety; CBA with second-generation CB (CB2) had a significantly shorter procedure time than IRF with contact force technology (CF-IRF) (WMD = - 20.75; p = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to suggest that one CA technique is superior to another. However, PVAC may be associated with a shorter procedural duration, and the CB2 catheters also seemed to reduce the procedure time compared with that of CF-IRF. Further large-scale studies are warranted to compare the available CA techniques and provide an up-to-date optimum recommendation.

A prospective multicenter study of direct comparison of feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using the minimally interrupted apixaban between second-generation cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: J-HIT apixaban

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) with minimally interrupted apixaban has not fully explored.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized prospective study, we enrolled patients with PAF undergoing CB or radiofrequency (RF) ablation with interrupted (holding 1 dose) apixaban. The primary composite end point consisted of bleeding events, including pericardial effusion and major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, or thromboembolic events at 4 weeks after ablation; secondary end points included early recurrence of AF and procedural duration.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients underwent PVI (125 assigned to the RF ablation and 125 assigned to the CB ablation). The primary end point occurred in 1 patient in the CB ablation group (0.8%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 3.70) and 3 patients in the RF group (2.4%, P = .622; risk ratio, 0333; 90% CI, 0.05 to 2.20). All events were pericardial effusion, all of whom recovered after pericardiocentesis. Early recurrence of AF occurred in 4 patients (3.2%) in the RF group and in 6 patients (4.8%) in the CB group (P = .749). The procedural duration was shorter in the CB group than that in the RF group (136.5 ± 39.9 vs 179.5 ± 44.8 min, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

CB ablation with minimally interrupted apixaban was feasible and safe in patients with PAF undergoing PVI, which was equivalent to RF ablation.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of atrial fibrillation percutaneous catheter ablation technologies using randomized controlled trials

AIMS

We sought out to make comparisons between all atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation technologies using randomized controlled trial data. Our comparisons were freedom from AF, procedural duration, and fluoroscopy duration.

METHODS

Searches were made of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases, and studies were selected which had cryoballoon, conventional radiofrequency (RF), multipolar RF catheters, and laser technology as an arm in the study and were identified as randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These studies were analyzed for direct comparisons using conventional meta-analysis and a combination of indirect and direct comparisons via a network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS

With respect to freedom from AF both direct comparisons and NMA did not demonstrate any significant difference. However in analysis of procedural and fluoroscopy duration (minutes) for the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC), both conventional analysis and NMA revealed significantly shorter procedure times, RF vs PVAC (conventional: 61.99 [38.03-85.94], P <.00001; NMA: 54.76 [36.64-72.88], P < .0001) and fluoroscopy times, RF vs PVAC (conventional: 12.96 [6.40-19.53], P = .0001; NMA: 8.89 [3.27-14.51], P < .01). The procedural duration was also shorter for the cryoballoon with NMA, RF vs CRYO (20.56 [3.47-37.65], P = .02).

DISCUSSION

Our analysis demonstrated that while there was no difference in the efficacy of the individual catheter technologies, there are significant differences in the procedural duration for the PVAC and the cryoballoon. While they may seem an attractive solution for high-volume centers, further RCTs of next-generation technologies should be examined.

Strategies to Improve the Outcome of Cryoballoon Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia contributing to severe outcomes, including cardiac dysfunction and stroke, and it has drawn great attention around the world. Drug therapies have been available for many years to terminate AF and control heart rate. However, the results from clinical studies on drug therapies have been discouraging. Mounting evidence indicates that radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a safe and effective method to maintain sinus rhythm, especially in patients who are drug intolerant or for whom the drugs are ineffective, although it is a technically demanding and complex procedure. Fortunately, a novel application, cryoballoon ablation (CBA), with outstanding characteristics has been widely used. Great outcomes based on CBA have manifested its significant role in the treatment of AF. However, how to improve the safety and efficacy of CBA is a question that has not been well-answered. Would it be helpful to develop a different generation of cryoballoon? Is bonus freezing beneficial, or not? Is it better to prolong freezing time? Dose CBA combined with RFCA bring higher success rates? In this review, we comprehensively summarized useful applications for improving outcomes of CBA in AF patients.

Sex-specific efficacy and safety of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: An individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health burden, and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) represents an attractive therapeutic option. Sex-specific differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of AF and PVI are recognized.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at comparing the efficacy, safety, and procedural characteristics of CB and RF in women and men undergoing a first PVI procedure.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials and prospective observational studies comparing CB and RF ablation with at least 1 year of follow-up. After merging individual patient data from 18 data sets, we investigated the sex-specific (procedure failure defined as recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, reablation, and reinitiation of antiarrhythmic medication), safety (periprocedural complications), and procedural characteristics of CB vs RF using Kaplan-Meier and multilevel models.

RESULTS

From the 18 studies, 4840 men and 1979 women were analyzed. An analysis stratified by sex correcting for several covariates showed a better efficacy of CB in men (hazard ratio for recurrence 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.98, P = .02) but not in women (hazard ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.16; P = .82). For women and men, the energy source had no influence on the occurrence of at least 1 complication. For both sexes, the procedure time was significantly shorter with CB (-22.5 minutes for women and -27.1 minutes for men).

CONCLUSION

CB is associated with less long-term failures in men. A better understanding of AF-causal sex-specific mechanisms and refinements in CB technologies could lead to higher success rates in women.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency as First Ablation Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Radiofrequency (RF) represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation, whereas cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a valid alternative. The aim of our meta-analysis was to explore the efficacy and safety of CB compared with RF as first ablation procedure for AF. We searched the literature for studies that investigated this issue. The primary efficacy outcome was AF recurrence. The safety outcomes were: pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, phrenic nerve palsy, vascular complications, and major bleedings. Fourteen randomized controlled studies and 34 observational studies were included in the analysis. A total of 7,951 patients underwent CB ablation, whereas 9,641 received RF ablation. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 7 months. Overall, CB reduced the incidence of AF recurrence compared with RF ablation (relative risk [RR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.94; p = 0.001), and this result was consistent across different study design and AF type. CB had a significantly higher rate of phrenic nerve palsy, whereas it was related to a lower incidence of pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.88; p = 0.011) and vascular complications (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77; p <0.001) compared with RF. There was no significant difference in major bleedings between the 2 strategies. CB ablation had a shorter procedural time compared with RF (mean difference -20.76 minutes; p <0.001). In conclusion, considered its efficacy/safety profile and short procedural time, CB ablation represents the preferable option for first AF ablation procedure.

Reducing radiation exposure in second-generation cryoballoon ablation without compromising clinical outcome

Purpose

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) ablation is associated with an increased radiation exposure compared with radiofrequency ablation. Previous studies showed that radiation exposure in CB PVI can be reduced by optimizing the fluoroscopy protocol without comprising acute efficacy and safety. We evaluated the mid-term outcome of a modified fluoroscopy protocol in patients undergoing CB PVI.

Methods

The study population comprised 90 consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB-based PVI. The first 46 patients underwent CB PVI with conventional fluoroscopy settings (group A, historic control group). In the following 44 patients (group B), a modified fluoroscopy protocol was applied consisting of (1) visualization of degree of PV occlusion only by fluoroscopy (no cine runs); (2) increased radiation awareness. Primary endpoints were the total dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and freedom from documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single procedure.

Results

Group B had a lower median DAP (1393 cGycm² vs. 3232 cGycm², P < 0.001) and median fluoroscopy time (20 min vs. 24 min, P < 0.001) as compared with group A. The 1-year freedom from documented recurrence of AF after a single procedure was similar among groups (74% in group A vs. 77% in group B, P = 0.71). There were no significant differences between both groups for the secondary endpoints, including procedure duration, proportion of patients with complete electrical isolation, and complications.

Conclusion

Using a modified fluoroscopy protocol and increased radiation awareness, radiation exposure can be significantly reduced in CB PVI with a similar 1-year clinical outcome.

Blood Coagulation Status during Cryofreezing Ablation and Effects of the Direct Anticoagulants Dabigatran and Edoxaban

Cryoballoon ablation is an established catheter-based approach to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). However, thromboembolic events cannot be avoided during cryoablation. There is little data regarding the blood coagulation status during freezing.The thrombin antithrombin complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F 1+2) of patient blood were measured during cryoballoon application when the cryoballoon temperature reached the nadir in 63 AF patients. TAT was also measured from porcine blood during cryoballoon freezing in 5 pigs.The TAT and F 1+2 increased from 6.60 ± 5.65 to 9.16 ± 7.28 ng/mL (P = 0.004) and from 279.6 ± 146.4 to 323.6 ± 169.1 pmol/L (P = 0.003) between the control and during freezing, respectively. The TAT increased from 0.46 to 0.87 ng/mL during freezing compared to that of pre-freezing (P < 0.05), and it returned to 0.39 ng/mL in 30 minutes after an intravenous edoxaban administration (N.S.).Dabigatran failed to exert sufficient anticoagulant effects during cryofreezing. In contrast, intravenous edoxaban seemed to provoke anticoagulation effects under extreme low temperature circumstances.

Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency lesions as detected by late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study

AIMS

Cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a reliable modality to isolate pulmonary veins (PVs) in atrial fibrillation. Ablation lesions and the long-term effects of energy delivery can be assessed by delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR). The aim of the study was to compare the number, extension, and localization of gaps in CB and radiofrequency (RF) techniques in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients submitted to PVI with CB in whom DE-CMR images were available (n = 30) were matched (1:1) to patients who underwent PVI with RF (n = 30), considering age, sex, hypertension, and diabetes. Delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance was obtained at 3 months post-procedure, and images were processed to assess the mean number of gaps around PV ostia, their localization, and the normalized gap length (NGL), calculated as the difference between total gap length and total PV perimeter. Patients were followed up for 12 months. The CB and RF procedures did not differ in the mean number of gaps per patient (4.40 vs. 5.13 gaps, respectively; P = 0.21) nor NGL (0.35 vs. 0.32, P = 0.59). For both techniques, a higher mean number of gaps were detected in right vs. left PVs (3.18 vs. 1.58, respectively; P = 0.01). The incidence of recurrences did not differ between techniques (odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 0.66-4.97; P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Location and extension of ablation gaps in PVI did not differ between CB and RF groups in DE-CMR image analysis.

Comparative Study of Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Isolation when Combined with vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction

Ethanol infusion (EI) in the vein of Marshall (VOM) has multifactorial effects that could be synergistic to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) versus cryoablation when combined with a VOM-EI has never been investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcome differences of AF ablation using RF versus cryoablation when combined with a VOM-EI.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients (n=132) underwent catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF with either RF or cryoballoon (CB) for PVI combined with VOM-EI. Bi-directional conduction block at the mitral isthmus was attempted. The end-point was the freedom from any atrial arrhythmias documented after a blanking period of 90 days after the procedure.

Results

Kaplan-Meier estimates of the arrhythmia-free survival after 1 year were 63.8 (RF + VOM), and 82.7 % (CB + VOM), respectively. Comparison between CB + VOM versus RF + VOM reached a significance (p=0.0292). The periprocedural complication rate was comparable in both groups (5.0 % RF, 5.8 % CB; p=0.14) with a significant difference in the incidence of phrenic nerve palsy (0 % RF, 2.0 % CB; p<0.05).

Conclusions

PVI with a CB had an increased freedom from AF recurrence compared to RF combined with VOM-EI. The present results suggest a potential additive effect of a VOM-EI to CB application.

Medium- and long-term outcome after a single second-generation cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To report medium- and long-term results following a single second-generation cryoballoon (CB2)-based ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent (PeAF) atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing a first CB2-based ablation procedure in a tertiary center. Cryoenergy was applied for 3 min if a time to effect <60 s was documented or 4 min otherwise, with a bonus application in cases of late isolation or suboptimal temperature. Follow-up was obtained from the regional health electronic records system and by telephone or personal interviews. Recurrence was defined as any atrial arrhythmia >30 s beyond a three-month blanking period. The clinical impact of recurrences was classified using a severity score.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients (134 PAF and 38 PeAF) were included, of whom 25 (14.5%) had structural heart disease and 120 (69.7%) had a normal or mildly dilated left atrium. Acute success was achieved in 167 (97.1%). After a median follow-up of 27 (14-41) months, 100 patients (58.1%) remained free of atrial arrhythmias (64.2% for PAF and 36.8% for PeAF, p=0.006). Left atrial size (p=0.05) and clinical presentation as PeAF (p=0.006) were predictors of recurrence. Of patients with recurrences, 11.1% did not require further therapies and an additional 16.7% had good control with antiarrhythmic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

A single CB2 procedure resulted in 58.1% of patients remaining free of atrial arrhythmias at 27-month follow-up. Conservative management was useful in 27.8% of patients with recurrences.

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation Using Ablation Index-Guided Contact Force Ablation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison to Cryoballoon Ablation

Introduction

Ablation Index, also known as VISITAG SURPOINT™, is a novel lesion-quality marker that improves outcomes in radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). There is no direct evidence on the comparative effectiveness of RF ablation with Ablation Index and cryoballoon (CB). The objective of the present study was to conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using individual patient-level data (IPD) to compare the effectiveness of RF ablation with Ablation Index to that of CB on recurrence of atrial arrhythmias 12 months after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF).

Methods

Individual patient-level data for RF ablation with Ablation Index were obtained from two studies: Solimene et al. [J Interv Card Electrophysiol 54(1):9–15, 2019] and Hussein et al. [J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 28(9):1037–1047, 2017]. Comparable CB studies identified from a systematic literature review were pooled. Prognostic variables for adjustment were ranked a priori by several practicing electrophysiologists. In the absence of a common treatment arm between the Ablation Index and CB studies, an unanchored MAIC was conducted. Primary analysis compared the Solimene et al. study to pooled CB studies. A secondary analysis compared pooled RF ablation with Ablation Index studies to pooled CB studies. Several scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results

Primary analyses showed statistically significant reductions in the rate of arrhythmia recurrence with RF ablation with Ablation Index compared to CB in unmatched, unadjusted (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27–0.95) and matched (0.42, 0.21–0.86) analyses. Greater reductions in the rate of arrhythmia recurrence that favored RF ablation with Ablation Index were observed after matching and adjusting for age (0.41, 0.20–0.85), age and left ventricular ejection fraction (0.37, 0.16–0.88), and age, sex, and left ventricular ejection fraction (0.30, 0.13–0.71). Secondary and sensitivity analyses showed similar reductions.

Conclusions

Radiofrequency ablation with Ablation Index was associated with reductions in recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared to CB in unmatched and unadjusted, matched, and matched and adjusted comparisons.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01173-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cryoballoon Ablation for Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice and induces cardiac dysfunction and stroke. The development of AF requires a trigger and also an electroanatomic substrate capable of both initiating and perpetuating AF. In the past decade, ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary veins (PV) have been identified as a source of paroxysmal AF. Thus, strategies that target the PV, including the PV antrum, are the cornerstone of most AF ablation procedures. Recently, alternative technologies to radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF such as balloon ablation modalities have been developed. The purpose of this review is to discuss cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF.

Comparing between second-generation cryoballoon vs open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation in elderly patients: Acute and long-term outcomes

Background

Limited comparative data are available regarding catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) using second‐generation cryoballoon (CB‐2) vs radiofrequency (RF) ablation in elderly patients (>75‐year‐old).

Hypothesis

CB‐2 ablation may demonstrate different outcomes compared with that using RF ablation for elderly patients with AF.

Method

Elderly patients with symptomatic drug‐refractory AF were included in the study. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients.

Results

A total of 324 elderly patients were included (RF: 176, CB‐2:148) from September 2016 to April 2019. The CB‐2 was associated with shorter procedure time and left atrial dwell time (112.9 ± 11.1 vs 135.1 ± 9.9 minutes, P < .001; 53.7 ± 8.9 vs 65.1.9 ± 9.0 minutes, P < .001), but marked fluoroscopy utilization (22.1 ± 3.3 vs 18.5 ± 3.6 minutes, P < .001). Complications occurred in 3.3% (CB‐2) and 6.2% (RF) of patients with no significant different (P = .307). The length of stay after ablation was shorter, but the costs were higher in the CB‐2 group (1.94 vs 2.53 days, P < .001 and 91 132.6 ± 3723.5 vs 81 149.4 ± 6824.1 CNY, P < .001) compared to the RF group. Additionally, the rate of early recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was lower in the CB‐2 group (14.2 vs 23.3%, P = .047), but the long‐term success rate was similar between two groups.

Conclusions

CB‐2 is associated with shorter procedure time, left atrial dwell time, and length of stay after ablation, but its costs and fluoroscopy time are greater than the RF group. Moreover, the rate of complications and long‐term success are similar between the two groups.

Comparative effectiveness of catheter ablation devices in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is most commonly performed using radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) catheters. Ablation Index is a novel lesion-quality marker associated with improved outcomes in RF ablation. Due to lack of direct comparative evidence between the latest generations of technologies, there is uncertainty regarding the best treatment option. Aim: To conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of RF with Ablation Index to other catheter ablation devices in the treatment of AF. Methods: Searches for randomized and nonrandomized prospective comparative studies of ablation catheters were conducted in multiple databases. The outcome of interest was 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmias after a single ablation procedure. Studies were grouped as high-, low- and unclear-quality based on study design and balanced baseline patient characteristics. Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis was conducted and results presented as relative risk ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: 12 studies evaluating five different catheter ablation devices were included. Radiofrequency ablation with Ablation Index was associated with statistically significantly greater probability of 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmias than Arctic Front (relative risk: 1.77; 95% CrI: 1.21-2.87), Arctic Front Advance™ (1.41; 1.06-2.47), THERMOCOOL™ (1.34; 1.17-1.48) and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ (1.09; 1-1.3). Results were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Radiofrequency catheter with Ablation Index is superior to currently available options for 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmias after AF ablation. This study provides decision-makers with robust, pooled, comparative evidence of the latest ablation technologies.

Pericardial tamponade as a complication of invasive cardiac procedures: a review of the literature

Cardiac tamponade (CT) is a rare but often life-threatening complication after invasive cardiac procedures. Some procedures favor CT. Furthermore, the incidence depends on patients’ comorbidities, sex and age and operators’ skills. In this paper we review studies and meta-analyses concerning the rate of iatrogenic CT. We define the risk factors of CT and show concise characteristics for each invasive cardiac procedure separately. According to our analysis CT occurs especially after procedures requiring transseptal puncture or perioperative anticoagulation. The overall rate of CT after such procedures varies among published studies from 0.089% to 4.8%. For this purpose we searched the PubMed database for clinical studies published up to December 2018. We included only those studies in which a defined minimum of procedures were performed (1000 for atrial fibrillation ablation, 6000 for percutaneous coronary intervention, 900 for permanent heart rhythm devices, 90 for left atrial appendage closure, 300 for transcatheter aortic valve implantation and percutaneous mitral valve repair with the Mitra-Clip system). The search was structured around the key words and variants of these terms. In addition, secondary source documents were identified by manual review of reference lists, review articles and guidelines. The search was limited to humans and adults (18+ years).

Second-Generation Visually Guided Laser Balloon Ablation System for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Learning Curve, Safety and Efficacy - The MERLIN Registry

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) results in a favorable clinical outcome, although its complexity demands a long learning curve. Balloon-based systems have been developed to possibly solve these limitations. The 2nd-generation laser balloon (LB2) offers optimized features for improved tissue contact and visibility. We determined the safety, efficacy and learning curve of the LB2 for PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 45 consecutive patients (89% persistent AF) were prospectively enrolled and divided into 3 groups (T1, T2, T3) of n=15 patients per group. All patients underwent PVI by 2 operators using the LB2. The operators were experienced in RF and cryothermal procedures, but not in laser ablations. A total of 174/177 PVs (98%) were successfully isolated. The median procedure time significantly declined from 132 (114, 158) to 119 (102, 127) and 91 (86, 105) min in T1-3, respectively (P=0.0009). Similarly, the median fluoroscopy time significantly decreased from T1 to T3 (22 (17, 27) vs. 21 (16, 24) vs. 13 (10, 17) min, respectively, P=0.045). Adverse events occurred in 6.7%, with a trend towards a lower complication rate with increasing experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The LB2 was safe and effective for PVI, even for operators without any previous experience in laser balloon-based PVI. Procedure time, left atrial dwelling time and fluoroscopy time decreased after a learning curve of 15 cases.