1
|
Yan QD, Gong KZ, Chen XH, Chen JH, Xu Z, Wang WW, Zhang FL. Comparison of Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation and Quantitative Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by Ablation Index for Atrial Fibrillation. Angiology 2024; 75:462-471. [PMID: 36809222 DOI: 10.1177/00033197231159254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
We compared the efficacy and complication rates of quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index (RFCA-AI) with those of second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA-2). Consecutive patients (n = 230) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing a first ablation CBA-2 (92 patients) or RFCA-AI (138 patients) procedure were enrolled in this study. The late recurrence rate in the CBA-2 group was higher than that in the RFCA-AI group (P = .012). Subgroup analysis showed the same result in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) (P = .039), but no difference was found in patients with persistent AF (P = .21). The average operation duration in the CBA-2 group (85 [75-99.5] minutes) was shorter than that in the RFCA-AI group (100 [84.5-120] minutes) (P < .0001), but the average exposure time (17.36(13.87-22.49) vs 5.49(4.00-8.24) minutes) in the CBA-2 group and X-ray dose (223.25(149.15-336.95) vs 109.15(80.75-168.7) mGym) were significantly longer than those in RFCA-AI group (P < .0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that left atrial diameter (LAD), early recurrence, and methods of ablation (cryoballoon ablation) were independent risk factors for late recurrence after AF ablation. Early recurrence of AF and LAD were independent risk factors for predicting late recurrence after AF ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin-Dan Yan
- Department of Rehabilitation, Xiamen Humanity Rehabilitation Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Ke-Zeng Gong
- Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Clinical Medical Research Center for Heart and Macrovascular Diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xue-Hai Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Clinical Medical Research Center for Heart and Macrovascular Diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Hua Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Clinical Medical Research Center for Heart and Macrovascular Diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhe Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Clinical Medical Research Center for Heart and Macrovascular Diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wei-Wei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Clinical Medical Research Center for Heart and Macrovascular Diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fei-Long Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Clinical Medical Research Center for Heart and Macrovascular Diseases, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Potter T, Tong C, Maccioni S, Velleca M, Galvain T. Cost-utility of VISITAG SURPOINT in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:568-576. [PMID: 38407315 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical studies have demonstrated the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of VISITAG SURPOINT® (VS), which provides important lesion markers during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CA with VS compared to CA without VS in AF from the publicly-funded German and Belgium healthcare perspectives. METHODS We constructed a two-stage cost utility model that included a decision tree to simulate clinical events, costs, and utilities during the first year after the index procedure and a Markov model to simulate transitions between health states throughout a patient's lifetime. Model inputs included published literature, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials AF outcomes, and publicly available administrative data on costs. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness of the model. RESULTS CA with VS was associated with lower per patient costs vs CA without VS (Germany: €3295 vs. €3936, Belgium: €3194 vs. €3814) and similar quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient (Germany: 5.35 vs. 5.34, Belgium: 5.68 vs. 5.67). CA with VS was the dominant ablation strategy (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios: Germany: €-52,455/QALY, Belgium: €-50,676/QALY). The model results were robust and not highly sensitive to variation to individual parameters with regard to QALYs or costs. Freedom from AF and procedure time had the greatest impact on model results, highlighting the importance of these outcomes in ablation. CONCLUSIONS CA with VS resulted in cost savings and QALY gains compared to CA without VS, supporting the increased adoption of VS in CA in Germany and Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom De Potter
- Cardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, Moorselbaan, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Cindy Tong
- Johnson and Johnson Medical, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Sonia Maccioni
- Johnson and Johnson Medical, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Maria Velleca
- Johnson and Johnson Medical, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Won DS, Park Y, An J, Ryu DS, Kang JM, Kim JW, Kim SH, Zeng CH, Kim H, Kim HS, Park JH, Lee SS. Stent-based electrode for radiofrequency ablation in the rat esophagus: a preliminary study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19135. [PMID: 36352051 PMCID: PMC9646798 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23472-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoluminal radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been widely used as a safe and effective treatment for Barrett's esophagus. However, inadequate RF ablation may occur due to insufficient contact between the electrode and target tissues. Herein, a stent-based monopolar RF electrode (SE) was developed to evenly deliver RF energy to the inner wall of the rat esophagus. The optimal RF parameters were evaluated in the exposed rat esophagus. The temperature in the rat esophagus reached 70 ℃ in 89 s at 30 W, 59 s at 40 W, and 34 s at 50 W. The technical feasibility and efficacy of RF ablation using SE were evaluated based on changes in histological transformation and immunohistochemical parameters of tissues compared at immediately, 1 and 2 weeks after the procedure. The degrees of inflammatory cell infiltration, fibrotic changes, TUNEL, and HSP70 in the RF-ablated rat esophagus were significantly higher than compared with sham control (all p < 0.05). TUNEL-positive deposition gradually decreased, but HSP 70-positive deposition maintained a similar level for 2 weeks. The stent-based RF ablation was technically feasible and effective in evenly inducing thermal damages to the rat esophagus. The RF ablation system using the SE may represent a promising treatment for endoluminal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sung Won
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Yubeen Park
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsu An
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of ICT Convergence Engineering, College of Science & Technology, Konkuk University, Chungju, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Sung Ryu
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeon Min Kang
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Won Kim
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Song Hee Kim
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Chu Hui Zeng
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hongbae Kim
- Department of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung-Sik Kim
- Department of Mechatronics Engineering, School of ICT Convergence Engineering, College of Science & Technology, Konkuk University, Chungju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Hoon Park
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sang Soo Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu M, Han Y, Zhao W, Chen W. Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Using Discrete Event Simulation. Value Health 2022; 25:975-983. [PMID: 35667785 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of 3 widely used atrial fibrillation (AF) treatments from the perspectives of Chinese healthcare system: antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), ThermoCool SmartTouch guided by ablation index (STAI), and second-generation cryoballoon (CB2). METHODS A discrete event simulation (DES) model was implemented to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of AADs, STAI, and CB2. AF disease progression was explicitly modeled based on the Atrial Fibrillation Progression Trial clinical study results. The base-case analysis assumed that patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) entered the model at the age of 55 years and had a CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ( > 65 = 1 point, > 75 = 2 points), Diabetes, previous Stroke/transient ischemic attack (2 points)-Vascular disease (peripheral arterial disease, previous myocardial infarction, aortic atheroma), Age 65 to 74 years, and Sex category) score of 2 for males and 3 for females. Model parameter uncertainties were incorporated throughout the DES simulation with full probabilistic model parameterization. RESULTS The lifetime cost-effectiveness evaluations showed that patients treated with AADs gained an average of 4.98 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and 9.63 life-years (LYs) at an average cost of US dollar (USD) 15 374. Patients treated with CB2 gained 5.92 QALYs and 10.74 LYs at an average cost of USD 26 811. The STAI group gained an average of 6.55 QALYs and 11.57 LYs at an average cost of USD 24 722. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios was USD 5927 and USD 12 167 per QALY for STAI versus AADs and CB2 versus AADs, respectively. Assuming the willingness-to-pay threshold for China is USD 30 390 per QALY, both ablation treatments will be cost-effective compared with AADs for patients with PAF. CONCLUSIONS The DES model demonstrated that catheter ablations are more cost-effective than AADs for patients with PAF under the healthcare system in China. Among catheter ablation technologies, STAI provides better outcomes at lower costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Hu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Han
- Health Economics Research Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wangyang Zhao
- School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Chen
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Charitakis E, Metelli S, Karlsson LO, Antoniadis AP, Rizas KD, Liuba I, Almroth H, Hassel Jönsson A, Schwieler J, Tsartsalis D, Sideris S, Dragioti E, Fragakis N, Chaimani A. Comparing efficacy and safety in catheter ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis. BMC Med 2022; 20:193. [PMID: 35637488 PMCID: PMC9153169 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02385-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the most efficient catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for AF ablation through network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed up to October 5th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA approaches were included. Efficacy was defined as arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. RESULTS In total, 67 RCTs (n = 9871) comparing 19 different CA strategies were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for PVI with renal denervation (RR: 0.60, CI: 0.38-0.94), PVI with ganglia-plexi ablation (RR: 0.62, CI: 0.41-0.94), PVI with additional ablation lines (RR: 0.8, CI: 0.68-0.95) and PVI in combination with bi-atrial modification (RR: 0.32, CI: 0.11-0.88). Strategies including PVI appeared superior to non-PVI strategies such as electrogram-based approaches. No significant differences in safety were observed. CONCLUSIONS This NMA showed that PVI in combination with additional CA strategies, such as autonomic modulation and additional lines, seem to increase the efficacy of PVI alone. These strategies can be considered in treating patients with AF, since, additionally, no differences in safety were observed. This study provides decision-makers with comprehensive and comparative evidence about the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020169494 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Charitakis
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Silvia Metelli
- Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Lars O Karlsson
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Antonios P Antoniadis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos D Rizas
- Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ioan Liuba
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Henrik Almroth
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Anders Hassel Jönsson
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Jonas Schwieler
- Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Skevos Sideris
- Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anna Chaimani
- Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), Université Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berman AE, Maccioni S, Khanna R. Atrial fibrillation ablation with advanced radiofrequency catheter versus second-generation cryoballoon catheter. J Comp Eff Res 2022; 11:659-668. [PMID: 35535654 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare cost and readmissions among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing ablation using the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF (STSF) radiofrequency catheter versus the Arctic Front Advance™ (AFA) cryoballoon catheter. Patients & methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was used for the study purposes. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the two groups. Costs and readmissions were assessed. A regression model was used for outcome assessment. Results: After propensity matching, 2767 patients were identified in each of the STSF and AFA cohorts. In the matched cohort, STSF patients had significantly lower supply costs than AFA patients. STSF patients had significantly lower 4-12-month AF-related inpatient readmissions compared with AFA patients (2.58% vs 3.99%; p = 0.0402). Costs of care summing index procedure and readmission costs were also lower for the STSF patients versus AFA patients. Conclusions: Patients who underwent AF ablation using the STSF catheter versus the AFA catheter had lower cost and AF-related readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam E Berman
- Baptist Heart-Cardiology, Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Sonia Maccioni
- Franchise Health Economics & Market Access, Johnson & Johnson, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Rahul Khanna
- Medical Device Epidemiology & Real-World Data Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Charitakis E, Metelli S, Karlsson LO, Antoniadis AP, Liuba I, Almroth H, Hassel Jönsson A, Schwieler J, Sideris S, Tsartsalis D, Dragioti E, Fragakis N, Chaimani A. Comparing Efficacy and Safety in Catheter Ablation Strategies for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020433. [PMID: 35204535 PMCID: PMC8870912 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), there is no consensus regarding the most efficient CA strategy. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for PAF. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL until the final search date, 5 October 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA strategies and methods for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were included. Efficacy was defined as lack of arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of six months. In total, 43 RCTs comparing 11 different CA strategies involving 6701 patients were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased in comparison with PVI with radiofrequency only for the following treatments: PVI with adjuvant ablation (RR: 0.79, CI: 0.65–0.97) and PVI with sympathetic modulation (RR: 0.64, CI: 0.46–0.88). However, PVI with radiofrequency was superior to non-PVI strategies (RR: 1.65, CI: 1.2–2.26). No statistically significant difference was found in safety between different CA strategies. Concerning different PVI strategies, no difference was observed either in efficacy or in safety between tested strategies. This NMA suggests that different PVI strategies are generally similar in terms of efficacy, while PVI with additional ablation or sympathetic modulation may be more effective than PVI alone. This study provides decision-makers with insights into the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Charitakis
- Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden; (L.O.K.); (I.L.); (H.A.); (A.H.J.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Silvia Metelli
- Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), INSERM, Université de Paris, 75004 Paris, France; (S.M.); (A.C.)
| | - Lars O. Karlsson
- Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden; (L.O.K.); (I.L.); (H.A.); (A.H.J.)
| | - Antonios P. Antoniadis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.P.A.); (N.F.)
| | - Ioan Liuba
- Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden; (L.O.K.); (I.L.); (H.A.); (A.H.J.)
| | - Henrik Almroth
- Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden; (L.O.K.); (I.L.); (H.A.); (A.H.J.)
| | - Anders Hassel Jönsson
- Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden; (L.O.K.); (I.L.); (H.A.); (A.H.J.)
| | - Jonas Schwieler
- Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Skevos Sideris
- Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Dimitrios Tsartsalis
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden;
| | - Elena Dragioti
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden;
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nikolaos Fragakis
- 3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.P.A.); (N.F.)
| | - Anna Chaimani
- Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), INSERM, Université de Paris, 75004 Paris, France; (S.M.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu C, Li X, Lv Z, Chen Q, Lou Y, Mao W, Zhou X. Second-generation cryoballoon versus contact force radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17907. [PMID: 34504121 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96820-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Catheter ablation has been recommended for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), with pulmonary vein isolation being the cornerstone of the ablation procedure. Newly developed technologies, such as cryoballoon ablation with a second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) and the contact force radiofrequency (CF-RF) ablation, have been introduced in recent years to overcome the shortcomings of the widely used RF ablation approach. However, high-quality results comparing CB2 and CF-RF remain controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety between CB2 and CF-RF using evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Databases including Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from their date of inception to January 2021. Only RCTs that met the inclusion criteria were included for analysis. The primary outcome of interest was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related complications, procedure time and fluoroscopy time. Six RCTs with a total of 987 patients were finally enrolled. No significant differences were found between CB2 and CF-RF in terms of freedom from AT (relative risk [RR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.14, p = 0.616) or total procedural-related complications (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.69-2.27, p = 0.457). CB2 treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) than CF-RF (RR = 4.93, 95% CI 1.12-21.73, p = 0.035). The occurrences of pericardial effusion/tamponade and vascular complications were comparable between the CB2 and CF-RF treatments (RR = 0.41, p = 0.398; RR = 0.82, p = 0.632). In addition, CB2 treatment had a significantly shorter procedure time than CF-RF (weighted mean difference [WMD] = - 20.75 min, 95% CI - 25.44 ~ - 16.05 min, P < 0.001), whereas no difference was found in terms of fluoroscopy time (WMD = 4.63 min, p = 0.179). CB2 and CF-RF treatment are comparable for AF patients regarding freedom from AT and procedure-related complications. Compared to CF-RF, CB2 treatment was associated with a shorter procedure time but a higher incidence of PNP. Further large-scale studies are warranted to compare these two techniques and provide an up-to-date recommendation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ravi V, Poudyal A, Pulipati P, Larsen T, Krishnan K, Trohman RG, Sharma PS, Huang HD. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing second-generation cryoballoon and contact force radiofrequency ablation for initial ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:2559-2571. [PMID: 32671920 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the preferred modalities for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Technological advances have improved procedural outcomes, warranting an updated comparison. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBA-2nd generation (CBA-2G) in comparison to RFA-contact force (RFA-CF) in patients with AF. METHODS MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 03/01/2020 for relevant studies comparing CBA-2G versus RFA-CF in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF. RESULTS A total of 17 studies, involving 11 793 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the outcomes of freedom from atrial arrhythmia (p = .67) and total procedural complications (p = .65). There was a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G (odds ratio: 10.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.85 to 19.55; p < .001). Procedure duration was shorter (mean difference: -31.32 min; 95% CI: -40.73 to -21.92; p < .001) and fluoroscopy duration was longer (+3.21 min; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.33; p = .003) in CBA-2G compared to RFA-CF. In the subgroup analyses of patients with persistent AF and >1 freeze lesion delivered per vein, there was no difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS In AF patients undergoing initial ablation, CBA-2G and RFA-CF were equally efficacious. The procedure duration was shorter, but with a higher incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in CBA-2G. In patients with persistent AF, there was no difference in the efficacy between CBA-2G or RFA-CF techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkatesh Ravi
- Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Abhushan Poudyal
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Priyanjali Pulipati
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Timothy Larsen
- Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kousik Krishnan
- Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Richard G Trohman
- Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Parikshit S Sharma
- Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Henry D Huang
- Division of Electrophysiology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kukendrarajah K, Papageorgiou N, Jewell P, Hunter RJ, Ang R, Schilling R, Providencia R. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of atrial fibrillation percutaneous catheter ablation technologies using randomized controlled trials. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:2192-2205. [PMID: 32495462 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We sought out to make comparisons between all atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation technologies using randomized controlled trial data. Our comparisons were freedom from AF, procedural duration, and fluoroscopy duration. METHODS Searches were made of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases, and studies were selected which had cryoballoon, conventional radiofrequency (RF), multipolar RF catheters, and laser technology as an arm in the study and were identified as randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These studies were analyzed for direct comparisons using conventional meta-analysis and a combination of indirect and direct comparisons via a network meta-analysis (NMA). RESULTS With respect to freedom from AF both direct comparisons and NMA did not demonstrate any significant difference. However in analysis of procedural and fluoroscopy duration (minutes) for the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC), both conventional analysis and NMA revealed significantly shorter procedure times, RF vs PVAC (conventional: 61.99 [38.03-85.94], P <.00001; NMA: 54.76 [36.64-72.88], P < .0001) and fluoroscopy times, RF vs PVAC (conventional: 12.96 [6.40-19.53], P = .0001; NMA: 8.89 [3.27-14.51], P < .01). The procedural duration was also shorter for the cryoballoon with NMA, RF vs CRYO (20.56 [3.47-37.65], P = .02). DISCUSSION Our analysis demonstrated that while there was no difference in the efficacy of the individual catheter technologies, there are significant differences in the procedural duration for the PVAC and the cryoballoon. While they may seem an attractive solution for high-volume centers, further RCTs of next-generation technologies should be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishore Kukendrarajah
- The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Paul Jewell
- Department of Critical Care, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ross J Hunter
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard Ang
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Rui Providencia
- The Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|