51
|
Nishijima TF, Deal AM, Lund JL, Nyrop KA, Muss HB, Sanoff HK. The incremental value of a geriatric assessment-derived three-item scale on estimating overall survival in older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:329-336. [PMID: 29426572 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A geriatric assessment (GA) assesses functional age of older patients with cancer and is a well-established tool predictive of toxicity and survival. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of individual GA items. MATERIALS AND METHODS 546 patients with cancer ≥ 65 years completed GA from 2009 to 2014 and were followed for survival status for a median of 3.7 years. The GA consisted of function, nutrition, comorbidity, cognition, psychological state, and social activity/support domains. GA items with p < 0.05 in univariable analyses for overall survival (OS) were entered into multivariable stepwise selection procedure using a Cox proportional hazards model. A prognostic scale was constructed with significant GA items retained in the final model. RESULTS Median age was 72 years, 49% had breast cancer, and 42% had stage 3-4 cancer. Three GA items were significant prognostic factors, independent of traditional factors (cancer type, stage, age, and Karnofsky Performance Status): (1) "limitation in walking several blocks", (2) "limitation in shopping", and (3) "≥ 5% unintentional weight loss in 6 months". A three-item prognostic scale was constructed with these items. In comparison with score 0 (no positive items), hazard ratios for OS were 1.85 for score 1, 2.97 for score 2, and 8.67 for score 3. This translated to 2-year estimated survivals of 85%, 67%, 51% and 17% for scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This three-item scale was a strong independent predictor of survival. If externally validated, this could be a streamlined tool with broader applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro F Nishijima
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Mann J, Ramakrishna R, Magge R, Wernicke AG. Advances in Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma. Front Neurol 2018; 8:748. [PMID: 29379468 PMCID: PMC5775505 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy (RT) has long played a crucial role in the treatment of glioblastoma. Over the past several decades, significant advances in RT treatment and image-guidance technology have led to enormous improvements in the ability to optimize definitive and salvage treatments. This review highlights several of the latest developments and controversies related to RT, including the treatment of elderly patients, who continue to be a fragile and vulnerable population; potential salvage options for recurrent disease including reirradiation with chemotherapy; the latest imaging techniques allowing for more accurate and precise delineation of treatment volumes to maximize the therapeutic ratio of conformal RT; the ongoing preclinical and clinical data regarding the combination of immunotherapy with RT; and the increasing evidence of cancer stem-cell niches in the subventricular zone which may provide a potential target for local therapies. Finally, continued development on many fronts have allowed for modestly improved outcomes while at the same time limiting toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Mann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rajiv Magge
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| | - A Gabriella Wernicke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Zygogianni A, Protopapa M, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Simopoulou F, Nikoloudi S, Kouloulias V. From imaging to biology of glioblastoma: new clinical oncology perspectives to the problem of local recurrence. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:989-1003. [PMID: 29335830 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1831-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
GBM is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors. Surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation have succeeded in providing a survival benefit. Although most patients will eventually experience local recurrence, the means to fight recurrence are limited and prognosis remains poor. In a disease where local control remains the major challenge, few trials have addressed the efficacy of local treatments, either surgery or radiation therapy. The present article reviews recent advances in the biology, imaging and biomarker science of GBM as well as the current treatment status of GBM, providing new perspectives to the problem of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zygogianni
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M Protopapa
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece
| | - F Simopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Nikoloudi
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - V Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Krauze AV, Peters C, Cheng J, Ning H, Mackey M, Rowe L, Cooley-Zgela T, Smart DD, Camphausen K. Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma- the NCI experience in tumor control, OAR toxicity and proposal of a novel prognostic scoring system. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:191. [PMID: 29187219 PMCID: PMC5707810 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0930-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives Despite mounting evidence for the use of re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent high grade glioma, optimal patient selection criteria for re-RT remain unknown. We present a novel scoring system based on radiobiology principles including target independent factors, the likelihood of target control, and the anticipated organ at risk (OAR) toxicity to allow for proper patient selection in the setting of recurrent glioma. Materials/methods Thirty one patients with recurrent glioma who received re-RT (2008–2016) at NCI – NIH were included in the analysis. A novel scoring system for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was designed to include:1) target independent factors (age, KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status), histology, presence of symptoms), 2) target control, and 3) OAR toxicity risk. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were performed using the Lyman model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) for comparison amongst variables. Results No patient, including those who received dose to OAR above the published tolerance dose, experienced any treatment related grade 3–5 toxicity with a median PFS and OS from re-RT of 4 months (0.5–103) and 6 months (0.7–103) respectively. Based on cumulative maximum doses the average NTCP was 25% (0–99%) for the chiasm, 21% (0–99%) for the right optic nerve, 6% (0–92%) for the left optic nerve, and 59% (0–100%) for the brainstem. The independent factor and target control scores were each statistically significant for OS and the combination of independent factors plus target control was also significant for both OS (p = 0.02) and PFS (p = 0.006). The anticipated toxicity risk score was not statistically significant. Conclusion Our scoring system may represent a novel approach to patient selection for re-RT in recurrent high grade glioma. Further validation in larger patient cohorts including compilation of doses to tumor and OAR may help refine this further for inclusion into clinical trials and general practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0930-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra Valentina Krauze
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| | - Cord Peters
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Jason Cheng
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Holly Ning
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Megan Mackey
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Lindsay Rowe
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Theresa Cooley-Zgela
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Dee Dee Smart
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Kevin Camphausen
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a decision-tree-based model. J Neurooncol 2017; 136:565-576. [PMID: 29159777 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2685-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
We assessed prognostic factors in relation to OS from progression in recurrent glioblastomas. Retrospective multicentric study enrolling 407 (training set) and 370 (external validation set) adult patients with a recurrent supratentorial glioblastoma treated by surgical resection and standard combined chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment. Four complementary multivariate prognostic models were evaluated: Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, single-tree recursive partitioning, random survival forest, conditional random forest. Median overall survival from progression was 7.6 months (mean, 10.1; range, 0-86) and 8.0 months (mean, 8.5; range, 0-56) in the training and validation sets, respectively (p = 0.900). Using the Cox model in the training set, independent predictors of poorer overall survival from progression included increasing age at histopathological diagnosis (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI [1.03-2.08]; p = 0.032), RTOG-RPA V-VI classes (aHR, 1.38; 95% CI [1.11-1.73]; p = 0.004), decreasing KPS at progression (aHR, 3.46; 95% CI [2.10-5.72]; p < 0.001), while independent predictors of longer overall survival from progression included surgical resection (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI [0.44-0.73]; p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (aHR, 0.41; 95% CI [0.31-0.55]; p < 0.001). Single-tree recursive partitioning identified KPS at progression, surgical resection at progression, chemotherapy at progression, and RTOG-RPA class at histopathological diagnosis, as main survival predictors in the training set, yielding four risk categories highly predictive of overall survival from progression both in training (p < 0.0001) and validation (p < 0.0001) sets. Both random forest approaches identified KPS at progression as the most important survival predictor. Age, KPS at progression, RTOG-RPA classes, surgical resection at progression and chemotherapy at progression are prognostic for survival in recurrent glioblastomas and should inform the treatment decisions.
Collapse
|
56
|
Furuta T, Sabit H, Dong Y, Miyashita K, Kinoshita M, Uchiyama N, Hayashi Y, Hayashi Y, Minamoto T, Nakada M. Biological basis and clinical study of glycogen synthase kinase- 3β-targeted therapy by drug repositioning for glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:22811-22824. [PMID: 28423558 PMCID: PMC5410264 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β has emerged as an appealing therapeutic target for glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we investigated the therapeutic effect of the current approved drugs against GBM via inhibition of GSK3β activity both, in experimental setting and in a clinical study for recurrent GBM patients by repositioning existent drugs in combination with temozolomide (TMZ). Materials and Methods Progression-free and overall survival rates were compared between patients with low or high expression of active GSK3β in the primary tumor. GBM cells and a mouse model were examined for the effects of GSK3β-inhibitory drugs, cimetidine, lithium, olanzapine, and valproate. The safety and efficacy of the cocktail of these drugs (CLOVA cocktail) in combination with TMZ were tested in the mouse model and in a clinical study for recurrent GBM patients. Results Activation of GSK3β in the tumor inversely correlated with patient survival as an independent prognostic factor. CLOVA cocktail significantly inhibited cell invasion and proliferation. The patients treated with CLOVA cocktail in combination with TMZ showed increased survival compared to the control group treated with TMZ alone. Conclusions Repositioning of the GSK3β-inhibitory drugs improved the prognosis of refractory GBM patients with active GSK3β in tumors. Combination of CLOVA cocktail and TMZ is a promising approach for recurrent GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Furuta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Hemragul Sabit
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yu Dong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Katsuyoshi Miyashita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Masashi Kinoshita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Uchiyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Hayashi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Yutaka Hayashi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Toshinari Minamoto
- Division of Translational and Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Mitsutoshi Nakada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Majewska P, Ioannidis S, Raza MH, Tanna N, Bulbeck H, Williams M. Postprogression survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a routine care cohort study. CNS Oncol 2017; 6:307-313. [PMID: 28990795 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2017-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the commonest malignant brain tumor in adults. Most patients develop progressive disease before they die. However, survival after developing progressive disease is infrequently reported. We identified patients with histologically proven disease who were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy during 2006-2013. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and postprogression survival (PPS) in relation to age, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation and extent of surgical resection. We identified 166 patients. Median survival was 13.5 months; 2-year OS was 21.7%. Median progression-free survival and PPS were 7.03 and 4.53 months, respectively. Age and extent of surgical resection were correlated with OS. Only the extent of surgical resection was associated with PPS. Our work suggests that the established prognostic factors for glioblastoma do not appear to help predict PPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Majewska
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Stefanos Ioannidis
- School of Medicine, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Muhammad Hasan Raza
- Oncology Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Rd, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - Nikhil Tanna
- Oncology Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Rd, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - Helen Bulbeck
- Brainstrust, 4 Yvery Court, Castle Road, Cowes, Isle of Wight, PO31 7QG, UK
| | - Mathew Williams
- Oncology Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Rd, London, W6 8RF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Tosoni A, Franceschi E, Poggi R, Brandes AA. Relapsed Glioblastoma: Treatment Strategies for Initial and Subsequent Recurrences. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2017; 17:49. [PMID: 27461038 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-016-0422-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT At the time of glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence, a sharp analysis of prognostic factors, disease characteristics, response to adjuvant treatment, and clinical conditions should be performed. A prognostic assessment could allow a careful selection between patients that could be proposed to intensified approaches or palliative setting. Participation in clinical trials aims to improve outcome, and should be encouraged due to dismal prognosis of GBM patients after recurrence. Reoperation should be proposed if the tumor is amenable to a complete resection and if prognostic factors suggest that patient could benefit from a second surgery. Second-line chemotherapy should be chosen based on MGMT status, time to disease recurrence, and toxicity profile. If enrollment into a clinical trial is not possible, a nitrosourea-based regimen is the preferred choice, carefully evaluating any previous temozolomide (TMZ)-related toxicity. In MGMT-methylated patients relapsing after TMZ completion, a rechallenge could be proposed. After second progression, the clinical advantage of subsequent lines of chemotherapy still needs to be clarified. However, based on performance status, patients' preference, and disease behavior, a third-line treatment could be considered. Available treatments include nitrosoureas, bevacizumab, or carboplatin plus etoposide. However, more effective therapeutic options are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rosalba Poggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alba A Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
van Linde ME, Brahm CG, de Witt Hamer PC, Reijneveld JC, Bruynzeel AME, Vandertop WP, van de Ven PM, Wagemakers M, van der Weide HL, Enting RH, Walenkamp AME, Verheul HMW. Treatment outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a retrospective multicenter analysis. J Neurooncol 2017; 135:183-192. [PMID: 28730289 PMCID: PMC5658463 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2564-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) universally recurs with dismal prognosis. We evaluated the efficacy of standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). From two centers in the Netherlands, 299 patients with rGBM after first-line treatment, diagnosed between 2005 and 2014, were retrospectively evaluated. Four different treatment strategies were defined: systemic treatment (SYST), re-irradiation (RT), re-resection followed by adjuvant treatment (SURG) and best supportive care (BSC). Median OS for all patients was 6.5 months, and median PFS (excluding patients receiving BSC) was 5.5 months. Older age, multifocal lesions and steroid use were significantly associated with a shorter survival. After correction for confounders, patients receiving SYST (34.8%) and SURG (18.7%) had a significantly longer survival than patients receiving BSC (39.5%), 7.3 and 11.0 versus 3.1 months, respectively [HR 0.46 (p < 0.001) and 0.36 (p < 0.001)]. Median survival for patients receiving RT (7.0%) was 9.2 months, but this was not significantly different from patients receiving BSC (p = 0.068). Patients receiving SURG compared to SYST had a longer PFS (9.0 vs. 4.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001), but no difference in OS was observed. After adjustments for confounders, patients with rGBM selected for treatment with SURG or SYST do survive significantly longer than patients who are selected for BSC based on clinical parameters. The value of reoperation versus systemic treatment strategies needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myra E van Linde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cyrillo G Brahm
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Philip C de Witt Hamer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Peter Vandertop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M van de Ven
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Wagemakers
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hiske L van der Weide
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roelien H Enting
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek M E Walenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Xi M, Liao Z, Deng W, Komaki R, Ho L, Lin SH. Recursive Partitioning Analysis Identifies Pretreatment Risk Groups for the Utility of Induction Chemotherapy Before Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:407-416. [PMID: 28871991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the contribution of induction chemotherapy (IC) before definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) based on recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 496 eligible patients with EC staged by positron emission tomography (PET) who received dCRT from 1998 to 2015 were included, 162 (32.7%) of whom underwent IC before dCRT. RPA was used to risk-stratify patients on the basis of independent prognostic factors to predict progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were compared between treatment groups. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 49.1 months (range, 7.0-155.9 months) for survivors. Compared with the non-IC group, the IC group had a comparable 5-year PFS rate (21.0% vs 23.4%; P=.726) in the whole cohort. Multivariate analysis identified age, performance status, primary tumor length, baseline PET maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), and maximum lymph node diameter as independent prognostic factors for PFS. RPA segregated patients into 3 prognostic groups: low-risk group (PET SUVmax <9.7 and tumor length ≤5 cm), intermediate-risk group (PET SUVmax ≥9.7 and age ≥67), and high-risk group (PET SUVmax <9.7 and tumor length >5 cm, or PET SUVmax ≥9.7 and age <67). Significant improvements in PFS (P=.006) and locoregional failure-free survival (P=.028) in the IC group in comparison with the non-IC group were observed in high-risk patients, whereas no differences in survival were found between the 2 treatment groups in low-risk or intermediate-risk patients. After propensity score matching, the high-risk group still demonstrated a significantly improved PFS with IC (P=.009). CONCLUSIONS The RPA prognostic grouping provides a useful method of selecting high-risk EC patients who may benefit from IC before receiving dCRT. Prospective validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mian Xi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Weiye Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Linus Ho
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Kondo N, Barth RF, Miyatake SI, Kawabata S, Suzuki M, Ono K, Lehman NL. Cerebrospinal fluid dissemination of high-grade gliomas following boron neutron capture therapy occurs more frequently in the small cell subtype of IDH1 R132H mutation-negative glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2017; 133:107-118. [PMID: 28534152 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2408-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We have used boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) to treat patients in Japan with newly diagnosed or recurrent high-grade gliomas and have observed a significant increase in median survival time following BNCT. Although cerebrospinal fluid dissemination (CSFD) is not usually seen with the current standard therapy of patients with glioblastoma (GBM), here we report that subarachnoid or intraventricular CSFD was the most frequent cause of death for a cohort of our patients with high-grade gliomas who had been treated with BNCT. The study population consisted of 87 patients with supratentorial high-grade gliomas; 41 had newly diagnosed tumors and 46 had recurrent tumors. Thirty of 87 patients who were treated between January 2002 and July 2013 developed CSFD. Tumor histology before BNCT and immunohistochemical staining for two molecular markers, Ki-67 and IDH1R132H, were evaluated for 20 of the 30 patients for whom pathology slides were available. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on 3 IDH1R132H-positive and 1 control IDH1R132H-negative tumors in order to determine chromosome 1p and 19q status. Histopathologic evaluation revealed that 10 of the 20 patients' tumors were IDH1R132H-negative small cell GBMs. The remaining patients had tumors consisting of other IDH1R132H-negative GBM variants, an IDH1R132H-positive GBM and two anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. Ki-67 immunopositivity ranged from 2 to 75%. In summary, IDH1R132H-negative GBMs, especially small cell GBMs, accounted for a disproportionately large number of patients who had CSF dissemination. This suggests that these tumor types had an increased propensity to disseminate via the CSF following BNCT and that these patients are at high risk for this clinically serious event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsuko Kondo
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, Sennan-gun, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Rolf F Barth
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shin-Ichi Miyatake
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinji Kawabata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Minoru Suzuki
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, Sennan-gun, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Ono
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, Sennan-gun, Osaka, Japan
| | - Norman L Lehman
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Goryaynov SA, Gol'dberg MF, Golanov AV, Zolotova SV, Shishkina LV, Ryzhova MV, Pitskhelauri DI, Zhukov VY, Usachev DY, Belyaev AY, Kondrashov AV, Shurkhay VA, Potapov AA. [The phenomenon of long-term survival in glioblastoma patients. Part I: the role of clinical and demographic factors and an IDH1 mutation (R 132 H)]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2017; 81:5-16. [PMID: 28665384 DOI: 10.17116/neiro20178135-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The median overall survival of glioblastoma patients is about 15 months. Only a small number of patients survive 3 years. The factors of a favorable prognosis for the 'longevity phenomenon' in glioblastoma patients are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE to determine the occurrence rate of long-living patients with glioblastomas, identify clinical predictors of a favorable prognosis, and identify the presence and prognostic significance of an IDH1 mutation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Among 1494 patients operated on for glioblastoma at the Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute from 2007 to 2012, there were 84 (5.6%) patients who lived more than 3 years after primary surgery. In all the cases, histological specimens were reviewed, and immunohistochemical detection of a mutant IDH1 protein was performed. Overall survival was calculated from the time of first surgery to the date of the last consultation or death, and the recurrence-free period was calculated from the time of first surgery to MRI-verified tumor progression. RESULTS The median age of long-living patients with glioblastoma was 45 years (19-65 years). All tumors were located supratentorially. The median Karnofsky performance status score at the time of surgery was 80 (range, 70-100). All patients underwent microsurgical resection of the tumor, followed by chemoradiotherapy. The median recurrence-free period was 36 months (5-98 months). Overall survival of 48, 60, and 84 months was achieved in 23, 15 and 6% of patients, respectively. Among 49 specimens available for the IDH1 analysis, 14 (28.6%) specimens had a mutant protein. There was no significant difference in survival rates in patients with positive and negative results for IDH1 (44.1 vs. 40.8 months; p>0.05). CONCLUSION The significance of various factors that may be predictors of a favorable course of the disease is discussed in the literature. This work is the first part of analysis of prognostically significant factors positively affecting overall survival of glioblastoma patients. In our series, the predictors of a favorable prognosis for long-living patients with the verified diagnosis of glioblastoma were as follows: young age, the supratentorial location of the tumor, a high Karnofsky score before surgery, and tumor resection. In our series, we used immunohistochemical tests and found no prognostic significance of the IDH1 gene mutation; further analysis will require application of direct sequencing. We plan to study other morphological and molecular genetic features of tumors, which explain prolonged survival of glioblastoma patients, as well as the role of various types of combined chemoradiation treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M F Gol'dberg
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Golanov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - S V Zolotova
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - M V Ryzhova
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - D I Pitskhelauri
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - V Yu Zhukov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - D Yu Usachev
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Yu Belyaev
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Kondrashov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - V A Shurkhay
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Potapov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Verlut C, Mouillet G, Magnin E, Buffet-Miny J, Viennet G, Cattin F, Billon-Grand NC, Bonnet E, Servagi-Vernat S, Godard J, Billon-Grand R, Petit A, Moulin T, Cals L, Pivot X, Curtit E. Age, Neurological Status MRC Scale, and Postoperative Morbidity are Prognostic Factors in Patients with Glioblastoma Treated by Chemoradiotherapy. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY 2016; 10:77-82. [PMID: 27559302 PMCID: PMC4990148 DOI: 10.4137/cmo.s38474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2015] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Temozolomide and concomitant radiotherapy followed by temozolomide has been used as a standard therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiform since 2005. A search for prognostic factors was conducted in patients with glioblastoma routinely treated by this strategy in our institution. METHODS This retrospective study included all patients with histologically proven glioblastoma diagnosed between June 1, 2005, and January 1, 2012, in the Franche-Comté region and treated by radiotherapy (daily fractions of 2 Gy for a total of 60 Gy) combined with temozolomide at a dose of 75 mg/m2 per day, followed by six cycles of maintenance temozolomide (150–200 mg/m2, five consecutive days per month). The primary aim was to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) in this cohort of patients. RESULTS One hundred three patients were included in this study. The median age was 64 years. The median OS was 13.7 months (95% confidence interval, 12.5–15.9 months). In multivariate analysis, age over 65 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.88; P = 0.01), Medical Research Council (MRC) scale 3–4 (HR = 1.62; P = 0.038), and occurrence of postoperative complications (HR = 2.15; P = 0.028) were associated with unfavorable OS. CONCLUSIONS This study identified three prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma eligible to the standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment. Age over 65 years, MRC scale 3–4, and occurrence of postoperative complications were associated with unfavorable OS. A simple clinical evaluation including these three factors enables to estimate the patient prognosis. MRC neurological scale could be a useful, quick, and simple measure to assess neurological status in glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clotilde Verlut
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Guillaume Mouillet
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Eloi Magnin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Joëlle Buffet-Miny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Gabriel Viennet
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Françoise Cattin
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | | | - Emilie Bonnet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | | | - Joël Godard
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Romain Billon-Grand
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Antoine Petit
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Thierry Moulin
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France.; University of Franche-Comté, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France
| | - Laurent Cals
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France
| | - Xavier Pivot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France.; University of Franche-Comté, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; INSERM UMR1098, Besançon, France
| | - Elsa Curtit
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon cedex, France.; University of Franche-Comté, UMR1098, SFR IBCT, Besançon, France.; INSERM UMR1098, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Orman ES, Ghabril M, Chalasani N. Poor Performance Status Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:1189-1195.e1. [PMID: 27046483 PMCID: PMC4955687 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Functional status (a patient's ability to perform activities that meet basic needs, fulfill usual roles, and maintain health and well-being) has been linked to outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and can be measured by the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scale. We investigated the association between KPS score and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS We used the United Network for Organ Sharing database to perform a retrospective cohort study of patients listed for liver transplantation in the United States between 2005 and 2015. We used Cox proportional hazards and competing risk regression analyses to examine the association between KPS and mortality and transplantation. RESULTS Of 79,092 patients, 44% were in KPS category A (KPS, 80%-100%), 43% were in category B (KPS, 50%-70%), and 13% were in category C (KPS, 10%-40%). Between 2005 and 2015, the proportion of patients in category A decreased from 53% to 35%, whereas the proportions in categories B and C increased from 36% to 49% and from 11% to 16%, respectively. KPS was associated with mortality: compared with patients in KPS category A, the KPS B adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.18) and the KPS C adjusted HR was 1.63 (95% CI, 1.55-1.72). KPS was also associated with liver transplantation; compared with patients in KPS category A, the KPS B adjusted HR was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06-1.11) and the KPS C adjusted HR was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.30-1.40). In competing risk analysis, only the relationship between KPS and mortality maintained significance and directionality. These relationships were most pronounced in patients without hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation, poor performance status, based on the KPS scale, is associated with increased mortality. In this population, performance status has decreased over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S. Orman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Marwan Ghabril
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Naga Chalasani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
MIYATAKE SI, KAWABATA S, HIRAMATSU R, KUROIWA T, SUZUKI M, KONDO N, ONO K. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Malignant Brain Tumors. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2016; 56:361-71. [PMID: 27250576 PMCID: PMC4945594 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a biochemically targeted radiotherapy based on the nuclear capture and fission reactions that occur when non-radioactive boron-10, which is a constituent of natural elemental boron, is irradiated with low energy thermal neutrons to yield high linear energy transfer alpha particles and recoiling lithium-7 nuclei. Therefore, BNCT enables the application of a high dose of particle radiation selectively to tumor cells in which boron-10 compound has been accumulated. We applied BNCT using nuclear reactors for 167 cases of malignant brain tumors, including recurrent malignant gliomas, newly diagnosed malignant gliomas, and recurrent high-grade meningiomas from January 2002 to May 2014. Here, we review the principle and history of BNCT. In addition, we introduce fluoride-18-labeled boronophenylalanine positron emission tomography and the clinical results of BNCT for the above-mentioned malignant brain tumors. Finally, we discuss the recent development of accelerators producing epithermal neutron beams. This development could provide an alternative to the current use of specially modified nuclear reactors as a neutron source, and could allow BNCT to be performed in a hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-Ichi MIYATAKE
- Cancer Center, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Shinji KAWABATA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | - Ryo HIRAMATSU
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka
| | | | - Minoru SUZUKI
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Kyoto University Research, Reactor Institute, Kumatori, Osaka
| | - Natsuko KONDO
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Kyoto University Research, Reactor Institute, Kumatori, Osaka
| | - Koji ONO
- Particle Radiation Oncology Research Center, Kyoto University Research, Reactor Institute, Kumatori, Osaka
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Cabrera AR, Kirkpatrick JP, Fiveash JB, Shih HA, Koay EJ, Lutz S, Petit J, Chao ST, Brown PD, Vogelbaum M, Reardon DA, Chakravarti A, Wen PY, Chang E. Radiation therapy for glioblastoma: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6:217-225. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
67
|
Brown N, McBain C, Nash S, Hopkins K, Sanghera P, Saran F, Phillips M, Dungey F, Clifton-Hadley L, Wanek K, Krell D, Jeffries S, Khan I, Smith P, Mulholland P. Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cediranib plus Gefitinib with Cediranib plus Placebo in Subjects with Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156369. [PMID: 27232884 PMCID: PMC4883746 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, failed to show benefit over lomustine in relapsed glioblastoma. One resistance mechanism for cediranib is up-regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This study aimed to determine if dual therapy with cediranib and the oral EGFR inhibitor gefitinib improved outcome in recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS AND FINDINGS This was a multi-center randomized, two-armed, double-blinded phase II study comparing cediranib plus gefitinib versus cediranib plus placebo in subjects with first relapse/first progression of glioblastoma following surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and radiologic response rate. Recruitment was terminated early following suspension of the cediranib program. 38 subjects (112 planned) were enrolled with 19 subjects in each treatment arm. Median PFS with cediranib plus gefitinib was 3.6 months compared to 2.8 months for cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.72, 90% CI; 0.41 to 1.26). Median OS was 7.2 months with cediranib plus gefitinib and 5.5 months with cediranib plus placebo (HR; 0.68, 90% CI; 0.39 to 1.19). Eight subjects (42%) had a partial response in the cediranib plus gefitinib arm versus five patients (26%) in the cediranib plus placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS Cediranib and gefitinib in combination is tolerated in patients with glioblastoma. Incomplete recruitment led to the study being underpowered. However, a trend towards improved survival and response rates with the addition of gefitinib to cediranib was observed. Further studies of the combination incorporating EGFR and VEGF inhibition are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01310855.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Brown
- University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stephen Nash
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsten Hopkins
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Sanghera
- Hall Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Frank Saran
- Department of Radiotherapy and Paediatric Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Phillips
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Dungey
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Katharina Wanek
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Krell
- Department of Academic Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Jeffries
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Iftekhar Khan
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Smith
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Mulholland
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Brims FJ, Meniawy TM, Duffus I, de Fonseka D, Segal A, Creaney J, Maskell N, Lake RA, de Klerk N, Nowak AK. A Novel Clinical Prediction Model for Prognosis in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Using Decision Tree Analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11:573-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.12.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Revised: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
69
|
Brandes AA, Finocchiaro G, Zagonel V, Reni M, Caserta C, Fabi A, Clavarezza M, Maiello E, Eoli M, Lombardi G, Monteforte M, Proietti E, Agati R, Eusebi V, Franceschi E. AVAREG: a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study of fotemustine or bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18:1304-12. [PMID: 26951379 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 02/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few prospective studies have assessed the role of bevacizumab and included a control arm with standard treatments for recurrent glioblastoma. We conducted a noncomparative phase II trial (AVAREG) to examine the efficacy of bevacizumab or fotemustine in this setting. METHODS Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to receive bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or fotemustine (75 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, then 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks after a 35-day interval). The primary endpoint was 6-month overall survival (OS) rate (OS-6). No formal efficacy comparison was made between the treatment arms. RESULTS Ninety-one patients were enrolled (bevacizumab n = 59; fotemustine n = 32). Median age was 57 years (range, 28-78 y), and patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (n = 42), 1 (n = 35), or 2 (n = 14). OS-6 rate was 62.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.4-74.5) with bevacizumab and 73.3% (95% CI, 54.1-87.7) with fotemustine. OS-6 rates were lower in bevacizumab-treated patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors than in those with unmethylated tumors (50% and 85%, respectively), but higher in fotemustine-treated patients (87.5% and 50%, respectively). OS rates at 9 months were 37.9% (95% CI, 25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95% CI, 28.3-65.7) with bevacizumab and fotemustine, respectively, and median OS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.2) and 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.3-15.4), respectively. Toxicity was as expected with the 2 agents. CONCLUSION Single-agent bevacizumab may have a role in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba A Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Gaetano Finocchiaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Matteo Clavarezza
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Evaristo Maiello
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Marica Eoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Marta Monteforte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Emanuela Proietti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Raffaele Agati
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Vincenzo Eusebi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy (A.A.B., E.F.); Molecular Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F., M.E.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology- IRCCS Padua, Italy (V.Z., G.L.); Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (M.R.); Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (C.C.); Department of Medical Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy (A.F.); E.O. Ospedale Galliera, Genova, Italy (M.C.); Oncology Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (E.M.); OPIS, Palazzo Aliprandi, Desio MB, Italy (M.M.); Roche S.p.A. Medical Affairs and CO, Monza, Italy (E.P.); Neuroradiology Department, Bellaria-Maggiore Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna, Italy (R.A.); Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Section of Anatomic Pathology M. Malpighi-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy (V.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Urup T, Dahlrot RH, Grunnet K, Christensen IJ, Michaelsen SR, Toft A, Larsen VA, Broholm H, Kosteljanetz M, Hansen S, Poulsen HS, Lassen U. Development and validation of a prognostic model for recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan. Acta Oncol 2016; 55:418-22. [PMID: 26828563 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1114679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictive markers and prognostic models are required in order to individualize treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Here, we sought to identify clinical factors able to predict response and survival in recurrent GBM patients treated with bevacizumab (BEV) and irinotecan. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 219 recurrent GBM patients treated with BEV plus irinotecan according to a previously published treatment protocol were included in the initial population. Prognostic models were generated by means of multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, corticosteroid use had a negative predictive impact on response at first evaluation (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22-0.93; p = 0.03) and at best response (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-1.02; p = 0.056). Three significant (p < 0.05) prognostic factors associated with reduced progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were identified. These factors were included in the final model for OS, namely corticosteroid use (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18-2.45; p = 0.004), neurocognitive deficit (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.89; p = 0.03) and multifocal disease (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11; p < 0.0001). Based on these results a prognostic index able to calculate the probability for OS at 6 and 12 months for the individual patient was established. The predictive value of the model for OS was validated in a separate patient cohort of 85 patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION A prognostic model for OS was established and validated. This model can be used by physicians to risk stratify the individual patient and together with the patient decide whether to initiate BEV relapse treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Urup
- Department of Radiation Biology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kirsten Grunnet
- Department of Radiation Biology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ib Jarle Christensen
- Laboratory of Gastroenterology, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anders Toft
- Department of Radiation Biology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Center of Diagnostic Investigation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Neuropathology, Center of Diagnostic Investigation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Kosteljanetz
- Department of Neurosurgery, the Neurocenter, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
- Department of Radiation Biology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Lassen
- Department of Radiation Biology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, the Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Phase I Unit, Finsencenter, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Ringel F, Pape H, Sabel M, Krex D, Bock HC, Misch M, Weyerbrock A, Westermaier T, Senft C, Schucht P, Meyer B, Simon M. Clinical benefit from resection of recurrent glioblastomas: results of a multicenter study including 503 patients with recurrent glioblastomas undergoing surgical resection. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:96-104. [PMID: 26243790 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 184] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While standards for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastomas exist, therapeutic regimens for tumor recurrence remain mostly individualized. The role of a surgical resection of recurrent glioblastomas remains largely unclear at present. This study aimed to assess the effect of repeated resection of recurrent glioblastomas on patient survival. METHODS In a multicenter retrospective-design study, patients with primary glioblastomas undergoing repeat resections for recurrent tumors were evaluated for factors affecting survival. Age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extent of resection (EOR), tumor location, and complications were assessed. RESULTS Five hundred and three patients (initially diagnosed between 2006 and 2010) undergoing resections for recurrent glioblastoma at 20 institutions were included in the study. The patients' median overall survival after initial diagnosis was 25.0 months and 11.9 months after first re-resection. The following parameters were found to influence survival significantly after first re-resection: preoperative and postoperative KPS, EOR of first re-resection, and chemotherapy after first re-resection. The rate of permanent new deficits after first re-resection was 8%. CONCLUSION The present study supports the view that surgical resections of recurrent glioblastomas may help to prolong patient survival at an acceptable complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Haiko Pape
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Michael Sabel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Hans Christoph Bock
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Martin Misch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Astrid Weyerbrock
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Thomas Westermaier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Christian Senft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Philippe Schucht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (F.R., H.P., B.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany (M.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany (D.K.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, , Göttingen, Germany (H.C.B.); Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (M.M.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany (A.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany (T.W.); Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (C.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Universitätsklinikum Bern, Bern, Switzerland (P.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn, Germany (M.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
72
|
Goryaynov SA, Potapov AA, Ignatenko MA, Zhukov VY, Protskiy SV, Zakharova NA, Okhlopkov VA, Shishkina LV. [Glioblastoma metastases: a literature review and a description of six clinical observations]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEĬROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2015; 79:33-43. [PMID: 26146042 DOI: 10.17116/neiro201579233-43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION since the 1990s, the literature has described cases of glioblastoma metastases with the development of foci located at a distance from the primary tumor. However, the pathogenesis of this process remains unclear until the end. This focus is believed to result, on the one hand, from tumor metastasis from the primary site and, on the other hand, from multifocal growth. This article presents a literature review and a description of clinical observations of patients with glioblastoma metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 6 patients (1 female and 5 males) with brain glioblastomas who received treatment at the Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (5 patients) and the Department of Neurosurgery of the Research Center of Neurology (1 patient) in the period from 2010 to 2014. Neurophysiological control was used if the tumor was localized near the eloquent cortical areas and pathways; 4 of 6 patients were operated on using the methods of intraoperative fluorescence diagnosis (5-ALA agent--Alasens). RESULTS Four patients had metastases within one hemisphere, two had metastases in the contralateral hemisphere in the period of 5 to 18 months after the first operation. The primary tumor site was located near the ventricular system in two patients. In one patient, the lateral ventricle was opened during the first operation. In another patient, the prepontine cistern was opened during the first operation. In two patients, the primary tumor site was located at a distance from the lateral ventricles, however, the tumor was located near them during recurrence. Based on metabolic navigation, fluorescence of the tumor was observed in the four patients during both the first and repeated operations. CONCLUSIONS The close relationship between primary glioblastomas and metastases and the cerebrospinal fluid circulation pathways may confirm the fact of dissemination of tumor cells with cerebrospinal fluid flow. In our opinion, there should be an increased suspicion of the possibility for metastases of glioblastomas that are closely associated with the cerebrospinal fluid circulation pathways. Metabolic navigation with 5-ALA is effective both during primary surgery in patients with glioblastomas and during resection of glioblastoma metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A A Potapov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - M A Ignatenko
- Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - V Yu Zhukov
- Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Abstract
In almost all patients, malignant glioma recurs following initial treatment with maximal safe resection, conformal radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This review describes the many options for treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas, including reoperation, alternating electric field therapy, chemotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery, or some combination of these modalities, presenting the evidence for each approach. No standard of care has been established, though the antiangiogenic agent, bevacizumab; stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery; and, perhaps, combined treatment with these 2 modalities appear to offer modest benefits over other approaches. Clearly, randomized trials of these options would be advantageous, and novel, more efficacious approaches are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.
| | - John H Sampson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Martin RC, Gerstenecker A, Nabors LB, Marson DC, Triebel KL. Impairment of medical decisional capacity in relation to Karnofsky Performance Status in adults with malignant brain tumor. Neurooncol Pract 2015; 2:13-19. [PMID: 26034637 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npu030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the relationship between medical decisional capacity (MDC) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) in adults with malignant brain tumors. METHODS Participants were 71 adults with primary (n = 26) or metastatic (n = 45) brain tumors. Testing to determine KPS scores and MDC was performed as close together as possible for each patient. Participants were administered a standardized measure of medical decision-making capacity (Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument [CCTI]) to assess 3 treatment consent abilities (ie, appreciation, reasoning, and understanding). Capacity classifications (ie, capable, marginally capable, and incapable) were established using cut scores previously derived from healthy control CCTI performance. RESULTS The majority of participants had KPS scores of 90-100 (n = 39), with the remainder divided between KPS scores of 70-80 (n = 26) and 50-60 (n = 6). Comparisons between persons with KPS scores of 90-100 or 70-80 revealed significant differences on the CCTI consent standards of understanding and appreciation. Participants with KPS ratings of 90-100 achieved 46% capable classifications across all CCTI standards, in contrast with 23% of participants with KPS ratings of 70-80, and 0% of participants with KPS ratings of 50-60. CONCLUSIONS A substantial portion of brain-tumor patients with KPS scores reflecting only minimal disability nonetheless demonstrated impairments on standardized measures of MDC. Clinicians working with this adult population should carefully screen for capacity to make clinical treatment decisions regardless of functional/performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy C Martin
- Department of Neurology , Division of Neuropsychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (R.C.M., A.G., D.C.M., K.L.T.); Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.); Department of Neurology , Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.)
| | - Adam Gerstenecker
- Department of Neurology , Division of Neuropsychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (R.C.M., A.G., D.C.M., K.L.T.); Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.); Department of Neurology , Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.)
| | - Louis B Nabors
- Department of Neurology , Division of Neuropsychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (R.C.M., A.G., D.C.M., K.L.T.); Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.); Department of Neurology , Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.)
| | - Daniel C Marson
- Department of Neurology , Division of Neuropsychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (R.C.M., A.G., D.C.M., K.L.T.); Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.); Department of Neurology , Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.)
| | - Kristen L Triebel
- Department of Neurology , Division of Neuropsychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (R.C.M., A.G., D.C.M., K.L.T.); Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.); Department of Neurology , Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Liquid biopsies in patients with diffuse glioma. Acta Neuropathol 2015; 129:849-65. [PMID: 25720744 PMCID: PMC4436687 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1399-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Revised: 02/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Diffuse gliomas are the most common malignant primary tumors of the central nervous system. Like other neoplasms, these gliomas release molecular information into the circulation. Tumor-derived biomarkers include proteins, nucleic acids, and tumor-derived extracellular vesicles that accumulate in plasma, serum, blood platelets, urine and/or cerebrospinal fluid. Recently, also circulating tumor cells have been identified in the blood of glioma patients. Circulating molecules, vesicles, platelets, and cells may be useful as easily accessible diagnostic, prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers to guide patient management. Thereby, this approach may help to circumvent problems related to tumor heterogeneity and sampling error at the time of diagnosis. Also, liquid biopsies may allow for serial monitoring of treatment responses and of changes in the molecular characteristics of gliomas over time. In this review, we summarize the literature on blood-based biomarkers and their potential value for improving the management of patients with a diffuse glioma. Incorporation of the study of circulating molecular biomarkers in clinical trials is essential for further assessment of the potential of liquid biopsies in this context.
Collapse
|
76
|
Hasan S, Chen E, Lanciano R, Yang J, Hanlon A, Lamond J, Arrigo S, Ding W, Mikhail M, Ghaneie A, Brady L. Salvage Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with or without Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Single Institution Experience. Front Oncol 2015; 5:106. [PMID: 26029663 PMCID: PMC4432688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current standard of care for salvage treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is gross total resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for operable patients. Limited evidence exists to suggest that any particular treatment modality improves survival for recurrent GBM, especially if inoperable. We report our experience with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) with and without chemo/immunotherapy, identifying prognostic factors associated with prolonged survival. METHODS From 2007 to 2014, 19 patients between 29 and 78 years old (median 55) with recurrent GBM following resection and chemoradiation for their initial tumor, received 18-35 Gy (median 25) in three to five fractions via CyberKnife fSRT. Clinical target volume (CTV) ranged from 0.9 to 152 cc. Sixteen patients received adjuvant systemic therapy with bevacizumab (BEV), temozolomide (TMZ), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (125)I-mAb 425, or some combination thereof. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) from date of recurrence was 8 months (2.5-61) and 5.3 months (0.6-58) from the end of fSRT. The OS at 6 and 12 months was 47 and 32%, respectively. Three of 19 patients were alive at the time of this review at 20, 49, and 58 months from completion of fSRT. Hazard ratios for survival indicated that patients with a frontal lobe tumor, adjuvant treatment with either BEV or TMZ, time to first recurrence >16 months, CTV <36 cc, recursive partitioning analysis <5, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 were all associated with improved survival (P < 0.05). There was no evidence of radionecrosis for any patient. CONCLUSION Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1205 will establish the role of re-irradiation for recurrent GBM, however our study suggests that CyberKnife with chemotherapy can be safely delivered, and is most effective in patients with smaller frontal lobe tumors, good performance status, or long interval from diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaakir Hasan
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Eda Chen
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Rachelle Lanciano
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Medicine, Drexel University , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Jun Yang
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Medicine, Drexel University , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Alex Hanlon
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - John Lamond
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Medicine, Drexel University , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Stephen Arrigo
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Medicine, Drexel University , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - William Ding
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Medicine, Drexel University , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Michael Mikhail
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Arezoo Ghaneie
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Luther Brady
- Philadelphia CyberKnife/Crozer Keystone Healthcare System , Philadelphia, PA , USA ; School of Medicine, Drexel University , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Cormie P, Nowak AK, Chambers SK, Galvão DA, Newton RU. The potential role of exercise in neuro-oncology. Front Oncol 2015; 5:85. [PMID: 25905043 PMCID: PMC4389372 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with brain and other central nervous system cancers experience debilitating physical, cognitive, and emotional effects, which significantly compromise quality of life. Few efficacious pharmacological strategies or supportive care interventions exist to ameliorate these sequelae and patients report high levels of unmet needs in these areas. There is strong theoretical rationale to suggest exercise may be an effective intervention to aid in the management of neuro-oncological disorders. Clinical research has established the efficacy of appropriate exercise in counteracting physical impairments such as fatigue and functional decline, cognitive impairment, as well as psychological effects including depression and anxiety. While there is promise for exercise to enhance physical and psychosocial wellbeing of patients diagnosed with neurologic malignancies, these patients have unique needs and research is urgently required to explore optimal exercise prescription specific to these patients to maximize safety and efficacy. This perspective article is a discussion of potential rehabilitative effects of targeted exercise programs for patients with brain and other central nervous system cancers and highlights future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prue Cormie
- Edith Cowan University Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University , Joondalup, WA , Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia , Nedlands, WA , Australia ; Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital , Nedlands, WA , Australia
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Edith Cowan University Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University , Joondalup, WA , Australia ; Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University , Southport, QLD , Australia ; Cancer Council Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia ; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia , Sydney, NSW , Australia
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Edith Cowan University Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University , Joondalup, WA , Australia
| | - Robert U Newton
- Edith Cowan University Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University , Joondalup, WA , Australia ; The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Schiff D, Lee EQ, Nayak L, Norden AD, Reardon DA, Wen PY. Medical management of brain tumors and the sequelae of treatment. Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:488-504. [PMID: 25358508 PMCID: PMC4483077 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Accepted: 09/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with malignant brain tumors are prone to complications that negatively impact their quality of life and sometimes their overall survival as well. Tumors may directly provoke seizures, hypercoagulable states with resultant venous thromboembolism, and mood and cognitive disorders. Antitumor treatments and supportive therapies also produce side effects. In this review, we discuss major aspects of supportive care for patients with malignant brain tumors, with particular attention to management of seizures, venous thromboembolism, corticosteroids and their complications, chemotherapy including bevacizumab, and fatigue, mood, and cognitive dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eudocia Q. Lee
- Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia (D.S.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.Q.L., L.N., A.D.N., D.A.R., P.Y.W.)
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia (D.S.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.Q.L., L.N., A.D.N., D.A.R., P.Y.W.)
| | - Andrew D. Norden
- Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia (D.S.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.Q.L., L.N., A.D.N., D.A.R., P.Y.W.)
| | - David A. Reardon
- Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia (D.S.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.Q.L., L.N., A.D.N., D.A.R., P.Y.W.)
| | - Patrick Y. Wen
- Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia (D.S.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.Q.L., L.N., A.D.N., D.A.R., P.Y.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Radiosurgery reirradiation for high-grade glioma recurrence: a retrospective analysis. Neurol Sci 2015; 36:1431-40. [PMID: 25805705 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2172-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite various treatment strategies being available, recurrent high-grade gliomas (r-HGG) are difficult to manage. To obtain local control, radiosurgery (SRS) reirradiation has been considered as potential treatment. In the present study, a retrospective analysis was performed on r-HGG patients treated with salvage single- (s-SRS) or multi-fraction SRS (m-SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of salvage SRS in terms of overall survival (OS); toxicity was analyzed as well. Between 2004 May and 2011 December, 128 r-HGG patients (161 lesions) treated with CyberKnife(®) SRS reirradiation were retrospectively analyzed. Toxicity was graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 criteria. OS from the diagnosis date and OS from reirradiation were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 15 days-82 months). All patients completed SRS without high-grade toxicity. Radiation necrosis was observed in seven patients (6 %) with large volume lesions. The median survival from initial diagnosis was 32 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-years survival rates from diagnosis were 95, 62, and 45 % respectively. Median survival following SRS was 11.5 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-years survival rate following SRS was 48, 20, and 17 % respectively. On multivariate analysis, age <40 years, salvage surgery before SRS, and other post-SRS therapies (second-line chemotherapy and/or surgery) were found to significantly improve survival (p = 0.03). SRS represents a safe and feasible option to treat r-HGG patients with low complication rates and potential survival benefit.
Collapse
|
80
|
Woernle CM, Péus D, Hofer S, Rushing EJ, Held U, Bozinov O, Krayenbühl N, Weller M, Regli L. Efficacy of Surgery and Further Treatment of Progressive Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 2015; 84:301-7. [PMID: 25797075 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 03/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment options for patients with glioblastoma at progression have remained controversial, and selection criteria for the appropriate type of intervention remain poorly defined. The objectives were to determine which factors favor the decision for second surgery and which factors are associated with overall survival (OS) and to evaluate the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recurrent glioblastoma scale. The scale includes tumor involvement of eloquent brain regions, functional status, and tumor volume. METHODS A retrospective single-center analysis of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing initial surgery between January 2007 and December 2011 was performed. Patients were separated into two groups: those with versus those without second resection surgery at disease progression. OS was compared using the multiple logistic regression model, Cox proportional hazard regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS The data of 98 patients were statistically analyzed. Among the patients, 58 had initial surgery only (age 61.27 years; median OS [mOS] 14.81 months) and 40 underwent second surgery at disease progression (age 55 years; mOS 18.86 months). Age was the only predictor for repeated surgery (P = 0.012; odds ratio 0.94). At the time of tumor progression, administration of alkylating chemotherapy (P = 0.004; hazard ratio [HR] 0.24) or bevacizumab (P = 0.001; HR 0.23) was associated with longer OS. Reoperation was associated with a lower HR (P = 0.134; HR 0.66). The NIH recurrent glioblastoma scale showed statistically significant improvement of prognosis prediction with the addition of age. CONCLUSIONS Surgery of progressive glioblastoma and postoperative treatment at the time of progression is associated with improved OS in some patients. The addition of age may improve survival prediction of the NIH recurrent glioblastoma scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dominik Péus
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Silvia Hofer
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Ulrike Held
- Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Bozinov
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab-containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices. J Neurooncol 2015; 122:595-605. [PMID: 25773061 PMCID: PMC4436682 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1752-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as monotherapy and with irinotecan for recurrent glioblastoma in community-based practices. Adult patients with bevacizumab-naive, recurrent glioblastoma initiating second-line treatment (July 2006-June 2010) were identified using McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology Network health records. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates were analyzed through July 2011 and compared for bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab regimens using the log-rank test. An adjusted Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effects of patient and treatment characteristics on outcomes. The analysis identified 159 patients initiating second-line treatment with a bevacizumab-monotherapy (n = 57), bevacizumab-combination (n = 79), or non-bevacizumab (n = 23) regimen. Patient characteristics were generally similar across groups. In the Cox analyses, OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.82]; univariate medians: 8.86 vs. 5.19 months) was significantly longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens. Median PFS was longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens, but did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.64 [95 % CI 0.38-1.09]; univariate medians: 7.00 vs. 4.00 months). Analyses showed that each bevacizumab treatment group relative to non-bevacizumab had a reduced risk of death (bevacizumab-monotherapy regimen: HR 0.56 [95 % CI 0.31-1.03] and bevacizumab-combination regimen: HR 0.34 [95 % CI 0.21-0.68]). Patients receiving the bevacizumab-combination regimen trended toward longer OS and PFS than those receiving the bevacizumab-monotherapy regimen. Rates of bevacizumab-related toxicities were consistent with clinical trial reports.
Collapse
|
82
|
An armed, YB-1-dependent oncolytic adenovirus as a candidate for a combinatorial anti-glioma approach of virotherapy, suicide gene therapy and chemotherapeutic treatment. Cancer Gene Ther 2014; 22:30-43. [PMID: 25501992 DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2014.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2014] [Revised: 11/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the novel recombinant oncolytic adenovirus Ad-delo-sr39TK-RGD, armed with a mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase (HSV1-sr39TK) as a suicide gene, and explored its antitumor efficacy in combination with HSV1-sr39TK/ganciclovir (GCV) gene therapy and temozolomide (TMZ). Ad-delo-sr39TK-RGD is an E1-mutated conditionally replicating adenovirus dependent on the human Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1). Thus, we utilized the YB-1 dependency of the vector to target human glioma cells in vitro, using two-dimensional cell culture and three-dimensional multicellular spheroids, and demonstrated the strong replication competence and oncolytic potential of the virus. The cytotoxicity mediated by HSV1-sr39TK and its prodrug GCV enhanced the oncolytic effect even at <0.1 μg ml(-1) GCV and induced cell killing of > 95% after adding GCV 0-1 days following infection. An increased bystander effect of viral replication and GCV in co-cultured infected and uninfected cells was observed. Co-administrating Ad-delo-sr39TK-RGD with TMZ and GCV, spheroid growth was reduced drastically. Gamma counting of infected spheroids demonstrated successful accumulation of the radiotracer (18)F-labeled 9-[4-fluoro-3-(hydroxymethyl)butyl]guanine mediated by HSV1-sr39TK. Hence, our results show that the combination of YB-1-dependent virotherapy with suicide genes and TMZ effectively induces glioma cell killing and may allow for in vivo non-invasive imaging within a limited time frame.
Collapse
|
83
|
Clark GM, McDonald AM, Nabors LB, Fathalla-Shaykh H, Han X, Willey CD, Markert JM, Guthrie BL, Bredel M, Fiveash JB. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas: the University of Alabama at Birmingham experience. Neurooncol Pract 2014; 1:172-177. [PMID: 26034629 PMCID: PMC4369713 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npu028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly all patients with malignant glioma will have disease recurrence. Our purpose was to define the treatment toxicity and efficacy of concurrent bevazicumab (BVZ) with hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of relatively larger targets for patients with recurrent MG. METHODS A retrospective review of 21 patients with recurrent malignant glioma (18 glioblastoma, 3 WHO grade III glioma), treated at initial diagnosis with surgery and standard chemoradiation, was performed. All patients had concurrent BVZ with hypofractionatedSRS, 30 Gy in 5 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide or CCNU). RESULTS Median patient age was 54 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status was 80, and median target size was 4.3 cm (range, 3.4-7.5 cm). Eleven patients (52%) had previously failed BVZ. One patient had grade 3 toxicities (seizures, dysphasia), which resolved with inpatient admission and intravenous steroids/antiepileptics. Treatment-related toxicities were grade 3 (n = 1), grade 2 (n = 9), and grade 0-1 (n = 11). Kaplan-Meier median progression-free survival and overall survival estimates (calculated from start of SRS) for GBM patients (n = 18) were 11.0 and 12.5 months, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy did not appear to show any statistically significant efficacy benefit or have any propensity for toxicity. CONCLUSION BVZ concurrent with hypofractionated SRS was well tolerated by this cohort of patients with relatively larger targets. Ongoing randomized trials with more moderate radiotherapy dosing may help establish the efficacy of this regimen, though intricacies of this approach, including patient selection, radiation target volume delineation/size, and optimal radiation dose, will need further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant M Clark
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Andrew M McDonald
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Louis B Nabors
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Hassan Fathalla-Shaykh
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Xiaosi Han
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Christopher D Willey
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - James M Markert
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Barton L Guthrie
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - Markus Bredel
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| | - John B Fiveash
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Radiation Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (G.M.C., A.M.M., C.D.W., M.B., J.B.F.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neuro-Oncology , Birmingham, Alabama (L.B.N., H.F.-S., X.H.); University of Alabama at Birmingham Neurosurgery , Birmingham, Alabama (J.M.M., B.L.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
van den Bent MJ, Taal W. Are we done with dose-intense temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma? Neuro Oncol 2014; 16:1161-3. [PMID: 25063550 PMCID: PMC4136902 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Martin J van den Bent
- Dr Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands (M.J.v.d.B.); Dept Neuro-Oncology/Neurology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (M.J.v.d.B., W.T.)
| | - Walter Taal
- Dr Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands (M.J.v.d.B.); Dept Neuro-Oncology/Neurology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (M.J.v.d.B., W.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Onuma K, Ishikawa E, Matsuda M, Hirata K, Osuka S, Yamamoto T, Masumoto T, Zaboronok A, Matsumura A. Clinical characteristics and neuroimaging findings in 12 cases of recurrent glioblastoma with communicating hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014; 53:474-81. [PMID: 23883558 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.53.474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinically, recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is often associated with communicating hydrocephalus. We hypothesized that there are specific magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings at the diagnosis of recurrent GBM that predict subsequent hydrocephalus. Various clinical characteristics were investigated including outcome and MR imaging findings in 12 patients with recurrent GBM followed by hydrocephalus (Hydro group) and 21 patients with recurrent GBM without hydrocephalus (Non-hydro group). Patient age and presence of communicating hydrocephalus were significantly associated with poor outcome. Median survival with recurrent GBM was longer in the Non-hydro group than in the Hydro group. Low Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and poor recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (RPA class 3, 5, 6, or 7) at the diagnosis of recurrent GBM were associated with the presence of hydrocephalus. The incidence of leptomeningeal dissemination after recurrent GBM was higher in the Hydro group than in the Non-hydro group. Evans index and fractional anisotropy value showed no difference at the diagnosis of recurrent GBM, but some MR imaging findings indicated that lesion attached to the basal cistern and/or ventricle was closely associated with subsequent hydrocephalus. We recommend careful monitoring of the ventricle size and leptomeningeal dissemination, especially in patients with low KPS and/or poor RPA class, if MR imaging indicates that the lesion is attached to the basal cistern and/or ventricle at recurrence of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuniyuki Onuma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
86
|
Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN, Buatti JM, Olson JJ. The role of cytoreductive surgery in the management of progressive glioblastoma : a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 2014; 118:479-88. [PMID: 24756348 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1336-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2013] [Accepted: 12/28/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
QUESTION Should patients with previously diagnosed malignant glioma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplasm process undergo repeat open surgical resection? TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adults with previously diagnosed malignant glioma who are suspected of experiencing progression of the neoplastic process and are amenable to surgical resection. RECOMMENDATIONS LEVEL II Repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended in symptomatic patients with locally recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. The median survival in these patient diagnosed with glioblastoma is expected to range from 6 to 17 months following a second procedure. It is recommended that the following preoperative factors be considered when evaluating a patient for repeat operation: location of recurrence in eloquent/critical brain regions, Karnofsky Performance Status and tumor volume.
Collapse
|
87
|
Nava F, Tramacere I, Fittipaldo A, Bruzzone MG, Dimeco F, Fariselli L, Finocchiaro G, Pollo B, Salmaggi A, Silvani A, Farinotti M, Filippini G. Survival effect of first- and second-line treatments for patients with primary glioblastoma: a cohort study from a prospective registry, 1997-2010. Neuro Oncol 2014; 16:719-27. [PMID: 24463354 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective follow-up studies of large cohorts of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) are needed to assess the effectiveness of conventional treatments in clinical practice. We report GBM survival data from the Brain Cancer Register of the Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (INCB) in Milan, Italy, which collected longitudinal data for all consecutive patients with GBM from 1997 to 2010. METHODS Survival data were obtained from 764 patients (aged>16 years) with histologically confirmed primary GBM who were diagnosed and treated over a 7-year period (2004-2010) with follow-up to April 2012 (cohort II). Equivalent data from 490 GBM patients diagnosed and treated over the preceding 7 years (1997-2003) with follow-up to April 2005 (cohort I) were available for comparison. Progression-free survival (PFS) was available from 361 and 219 patients actively followed up at INCB in cohorts II and I, respectively. RESULTS Survival probabilities were 54% at 1 year, 21% at 2 years, and 11% at 3 years, respectively, in cohort II compared with 47%, 11%, and 5%, respectively, in cohort I. PFS was 22% and 12% at 1 year in cohorts II and I. Better survival and PFS in cohort II was significantly associated with introduction of the Stupp protocol into clinical practice, with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.78 for survival and 0.73 for PFS, or a 22% relative decrease in the risk of death and a 27% relative decrease in the risk of recurrence. After recurrence, reoperation was performed in one-fifth of cohort I and in one-third of cohort II but was not effective (HR, 1.05 in cohort I and 1.02 in cohort II). Second-line chemotherapy, mainly consisting of nitrosourea-based chemotherapy, temozolomide, mitoxantrone, fotemustine, and bevacizumab, improved survival in both cohorts (HR, 0.57 in cohort I and 0.74 in cohort II). Radiosurgery was also effective (HR, 0.52 in cohort II). CONCLUSIONS We found a significant increase in overall survival, PFS, and survival after recurrence after 2004, likely due to improvements in surgical techniques, introduction of the Stupp protocol as a first-line treatment, and new standard protocols for second-line chemotherapy and radiosurgery after tumor recurrence. In both cohorts, reoperation after tumor recurrence did not improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Nava
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (F.N., I.T., A.F., M.F., G.F.); Unit of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (M.G.B., L.F.); Department of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland (F.D.); Unit of Molecular Neuro-oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (G.F.); Unit of Neuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (B.P.); Department of Neurology, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy (A.S.); Unit of Clinical Neuro-oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy (A.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
88
|
Miyatake SI, Kawabata S, Hiramatsu R, Furuse M, Kuroiwa T, Suzuki M. Boron neutron capture therapy with bevacizumab may prolong the survival of recurrent malignant glioma patients: four cases. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:6. [PMID: 24387301 PMCID: PMC3923505 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Accepted: 01/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and importance Recurrent malignant gliomas (RMGs) are very difficult to control, and no standard treatments have been established for them. We performed boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for patients with RMG. BNCT enables high-dose particle radiation to be applied selectively to tumor cells. However, RMG cases generally receive nearly 60 Gy X-ray irradiation prior to re-irradiation by BNCT. Therefore, even with tumor-selective particle radiation BNCT, radiation necrosis in the brain and symptomatic pseudoprogression may develop. In four of our recent patients with RMG after BNCT, we applied the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab to treat two pathological entities. This approach appeared to prolong survival. Here we present the case reports of these four consecutive patients with RMG and discuss the novel use of bevacizumab in this context. Clinical presentation Four patients with RMGs were treated with BNCT at our institutes. Upon the referral for BNCT, they were assessed as belonging to the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 3 (n = 3 patients) or RPA class 4 (n = 1 patient) (the RPA classification for RMG was advocated by Carson et al. in 2007). The estimated median survival times for RPA classes 3 and 4 were 3.8 and 10.8 months, respectively, after some treatment at the recurrence. We applied BNCT for these four patients and administered bevacizumab when the lesions were considered radiation necrosis or symptomatic pseudoprogression. The class 3 patients survived after the BNCT for 14, 16.5 and > 23 months, and the class 4 patient survived > 26 months, with favorable improvements in clinical symptoms. Conclusion BNCT with the addition of bevacizumab for radiation necrosis or symptomatic pseudoprogression improved the clinical symptoms and prolonged the survival in RMG patients.
Collapse
|
89
|
Arrillaga-Romany I, Reardon DA, Wen PY. Current status of antiangiogenic therapies for glioblastomas. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2013; 23:199-210. [PMID: 24320142 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2014.856880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, lacks effective long-term treatment. The tumor is dependent on neovascularization for survival, making angiogenesis an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. The exact mechanism underlying the effects of antiangiogenic agents on GBM remains debatable, although it likely involves vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and other proangiogenic growth factors. Early studies in the recurrent GBM setting were promising and prompted two multinational randomized phase three trials (AVAglio and RTOG 0825) investigating the effect of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, in newly diagnosed GBM. AREAS COVERED In this article, the authors discuss the basic mechanisms of angiogenesis and antiangiogenic resistance. The authors additionally summarize the current state of clinical research and how it will impact both future research and the development antiangiogenic therapies. EXPERT OPINION The ultimate utility of antiangiogenic therapy in the management of GBM remains unclear. In an effort to improve outcomes, there remains an urgent need to better understand the biology underlying angiogenesis and tumor survival, as well as mechanisms of antiangiogeneic resistance. Ultimately, combinatorial approaches using antiangiogenic agents, targeted molecular therapy, immunotherapy or cytotoxics may be needed to improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Arrillaga-Romany
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology , 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey, MA 02114 , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
90
|
Brandes AA, Bartolotti M, Franceschi E. Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: advantages and pitfalls. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2013; 13:583-7. [PMID: 23617349 DOI: 10.1586/era.13.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Deciding upon the therapeutic approach for patients with recurrent glioblastoma is a challenge. Although second surgery may provide effective palliation, it has yet to be established whether it prolongs survival and/or improves quality of life; nor have data been reported in literature to demonstrate that repeat surgery is indicated for patients with recurrence. The few studies investigating this issue are retrospective and have been conducted on small series, and their data sets are not homogeneous. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to analyze predictors of outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma and to make a critical of review of data in literature with a view to comparing the effect on outcome of second surgery against well-known prognostic determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba A Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
91
|
Liu SY, Mei WZ, Lin ZX. Pre-operative peritumoral edema and survival rate in glioblastoma multiforme. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 36:679-84. [PMID: 24192774 DOI: 10.1159/000355651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to examine the relationship between pre-operative peritumoral edema and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We searched for studies involving patients with GBM who underwent pre-operative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography) in which the peritumoral edema was assessed as a prognostic factor for survival. 7 retrospective studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. 2 studies found that pre-operative peritumoral edema was an independent prognostic factor for decreased survival. 1 study found that survival was dependent on the severity of the peritumoral edema (minimal and severe: increased survival; moderate: decreased survival). 2 studies found that pre-operative peritumoral edema was a predictor of decreased survival based on univariate but not multivariate analysis. 1 study found that there was no relationship between pre-operative peritumoral edema and survival, while the remaining study found that patients with peritumoral edema had decreased survival compared with patients without peritumoral edema. There was considerable heterogeneity between the studies regarding the patient characteristics. The results of our systematic review are inconclusive; the available evidence does not definitely support or rule out an association between pre-operative peritumoral edema and survival. Hence, further, well-designed, prospective studies are clearly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shui-Yuan Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
92
|
Chen C, Huang R, MacLean A, Muzikansky A, Mukundan S, Wen PY, Norden AD. Recurrent high-grade glioma treated with bevacizumab: prognostic value of MGMT methylation, EGFR status and pretreatment MRI in determining response and survival. J Neurooncol 2013; 115:267-76. [PMID: 23974656 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1225-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2013] [Accepted: 08/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Although bevacizumab represented an important advance in treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG), responses occur in fewer than half of patients. There are no validated biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy that are available for routine clinical use. We assessed the prognostic values of imaging and molecular markers in this patient population. MRI scans from 191 patients with recurrent HGG obtained prior to initiating bevacizumab were reviewed for areas of enhancement, necrosis, T2/FLAIR abnormality, and ADC values. Serial MRI scans following the initiation of bevacizumab were evaluated for response and progression. Non-radiographic markers including EGFR and MGMT status were also assessed with respect to response and patient survival. 65 of 191 patients (34 %) showed complete or partial response at the time of their best response MRI and demonstrated longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the group without response (PFS: 6.9 vs 3.5 months, OS: 10.9 vs 6.1 months). Minimum ADC values within enhancing and non-enhancing regions were lower in responders compared to those of non-responders (1,099 vs 984 × 10(-6) mm(2)/s, p = 0.006). Smaller enhancing area was associated with longer OS (HR = 1.99, p = 0.017). The ratio of T2/FLAIR to enhancing area was prognostic of OS for only the Grade III HGG subgroup (HR = 0.14, p = 0.004). Area of enhancing tumor at baseline can stratify survival in patients with recurrent HGG treated with bevacizumab. The extent of edema relative to enhancing area may have a prognostic role specific to Grade III HGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Chen
- Harvard Medical School, 250 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
93
|
Péus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13:72. [PMID: 23870327 PMCID: PMC3722041 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 255] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For over 60 years, the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) has proven itself a valuable tool with which to perform measurement of and comparison between the functional statuses of individual patients. In recent decades conditions for patients have changed, and so too has the KPS undergone several adjustments since its initial development. DISCUSSION The most important works regarding the KPS tend to focus upon a variety of issues, including but not limited to reliability, validity and health-related quality of life. Also discussed is the question of what quantity the KPS may in fact be said to measure. The KPS is increasingly used as a prognostic factor in patient assessment. Thus, questions regarding if and how it affects survival are relevant. SUMMARY This review honors the original intention of the discoverer and gives an overview of adaptations made in recent years. The proposed algorithm suggests specific updates with the goal of ensuring continued adequacy and expediency in the determination of the KPS.
Collapse
|
94
|
Tabouret E, Barrie M, Thiebaut A, Matta M, Boucard C, Autran D, Loundou A, Chinot O. Limited impact of prognostic factors in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with a bevacizumab-based regimen. J Neurooncol 2013; 114:191-8. [PMID: 23756726 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1170-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2013] [Accepted: 05/25/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Bevacizumab has demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. However, the impact of prognostic factors associated with recurrent glioblastoma treated with cytotoxic agents has not been determined in patients treated with bevacizumab. To analyze the prognostic factors and clinical benefits of bevacizumab and irinotecan treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. This monocentric study retrospectively analyzed all patients with recurrent glioblastoma who were treated with at least one cycle of bevacizumab and irinotecan at our institution from April 2007 to May 2010. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) from the initiation of bevacizumab administration. Among the 100 patients that were identified (M/F: 65/35), the median age was 57.9 years (range: 18-76). Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was <70 in 44 patients and ≥ 70 in 56 patients; 83 % of the patients were on steroids. The median tumor area was 2012 mm². The median progression free survival was 3.9 months (CI 95 %: 3.4-4.3). The median OS was 6.5 months (CI 95 %: 5.6-7.4). Multivariate analysis revealed that OS was affected by KPS (p = 0.024), but not by gender, age, steroid treatment, number of previous lines of treatment, tumor size, or time from initial diagnosis. KPS was improved in 30 patients, including 14/44 patients with an initial KPS <70. The median duration of maintained functional independence (KPS ≥ 70) was 3.75 months (CI 95 %: 2.9-4.6). The median OS from initial diagnosis was 18.9 months (CI 95 %: 17.5-20.3). In patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab, KPS was revealed as the only factor to impact OS. The clinical benefits associated with this regimen appear valuable. A positive impact of bevacizumab administration on OS of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Tabouret
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Timone Hospital, APHM, 264, rue Saint Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
95
|
Miyatake SI, Furuse M, Kawabata S, Maruyama T, Kumabe T, Kuroiwa T, Ono K. Bevacizumab treatment of symptomatic pseudoprogression after boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent malignant gliomas. Report of 2 cases. Neuro Oncol 2013; 15:650-5. [PMID: 23460324 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has been used for the treatment of radiation necrosis. Thus far, however, there has been no definitive report on its use for the treatment of symptomatic pseudoprogression. Here we report 2 cases of successful treatment with bevacizumab for symptomatic pseudoprogression after boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) was applied for recurrent malignant gliomas. METHODS Two recurrent malignant gliomas received BNCT. Both cases were treated with intravenous administration of bevacizumab at the deterioration that seemed to be symptomatic pseudoprogression. RESULTS The first case was recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and the second was recurrent anaplastic oligoastrocytoma. Both cases recurred after standard chemoradiotherapy and were referred to our institute for BNCT, which is tumor-selective particle radiation. Just prior to neutron irradiation, PET with an amino acid tracer was applied in each case to confirm tumor recurrence. Both cases showed deterioration in symptoms, as well as on MRI, at intervals of 4 months and 2 months, respectively, after BNCT. For the first case, a second PET was applied in order to confirm no increase in tracer uptake. We diagnosed both cases as symptomatic pseudoprogression and started the intravenous administration of 5 mg/kg bevacizumab biweekly with 6 cycles. Both cases responded well to this, showing rapid and dramatic improvement in neuroimaging and clinical symptoms. No tumor progression was observed 8 months after BNCT. CONCLUSIONS Bevacizumab showed marked effects on symptomatic pseudoprogression after BNCT. BNCT combined with bevacizumab may prolong the survival of patients with recurrent malignant gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin-Ichi Miyatake
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
96
|
Mazurowski MA, Desjardins A, Malof JM. Imaging descriptors improve the predictive power of survival models for glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol 2013; 15:1389-94. [PMID: 23396489 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because effective prediction of survival time can be highly beneficial for the treatment of glioblastoma patients, the relationship between survival time and multiple patient characteristics has been investigated. In this paper, we investigate whether the predictive power of a survival model based on clinical patient features improves when MRI features are also included in the model. METHODS The subjects in this study were 82 glioblastoma patients for whom clinical features as well as MR imaging exams were made available by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Twenty-six imaging features in the available MR scans were assessed by radiologists from the TCGA Glioma Phenotype Research Group. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression to construct 2 survival models: one that used 3 clinical features (age, gender, and KPS) as the covariates and 1 that used both the imaging features and the clinical features as the covariates. Then, we used 2 measures to compare the predictive performance of these 2 models: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the 1-year survival threshold and overall concordance index. To eliminate any positive performance estimation bias, we used leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS The performance of the model based on both clinical and imaging features was higher than the performance of the model based on only the clinical features, in terms of both area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P < .01) and the overall concordance index (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Imaging features assessed using a controlled lexicon have additional predictive value compared with clinical features when predicting survival time in glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Andrzej Mazurowski
- Corresponding Author: Jordan Malof, PhD, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Duke University, 130 Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
97
|
Tanaka M, Tsuno NH, Fujii T, Todo T, Saito N, Takahashi K. Human umbilical vein endothelial cell vaccine therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer Sci 2012; 104:200-5. [PMID: 23106822 DOI: 10.1111/cas.12055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2012] [Revised: 09/22/2012] [Accepted: 10/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of glutaraldehyde-fixed human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) vaccine for the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients of a HUVEC vaccine group received intradermal injections of 5 × 10(7) HUVEC weekly during the first month, and every 2 weeks from the second month, until progression of the disease was observed. Salvage treatment consisted of multimodal chemotherapy, radiation, including gamma-knife therapy, and/or repeated surgery, when feasible. Hazard ratios for death were calculated using a Cox model. A total of 17 patients with recurrent glioblastoma were enrolled in this study. All the patients received the initial treatment consisting of maximal safe surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy of 50-80 Gy or more, with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of temozolomide or nimustine (ACNU). A total of 352 vaccinations were performed for the patients of the HUVEC vaccine group (median number of vaccination = 11 doses; range 3-122 doses). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 11.4 months, respectively. The median overall survival from the diagnosis was 24.3 months. The HUVEC vaccine therapy significantly prolonged the tumor doubling time and contributed to reducing the tumor growth rate. Hematological adverse reactions due to chemotherapy were recognized: one patient experienced grade III leukocytopenia and one showed grade II lymphocytopenia. Associated with the HUVEC vaccine therapy, a delayed-type hypersensitivity-like skin reaction developed at the injection site. The HUVEC vaccine therapy effectively controlled disease progression, without evident adverse effects, except for a delayed-type hypersensitivity-like skin reaction at the injection site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Tanaka
- Department of Transfusion Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
98
|
De Vleeschouwer S, Ardon H, Van Calenbergh F, Sciot R, Wilms G, van Loon J, Goffin J, Van Gool S. Stratification according to HGG-IMMUNO RPA model predicts outcome in a large group of patients with relapsed malignant glioma treated by adjuvant postoperative dendritic cell vaccination. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2012; 61:2105-12. [PMID: 22565485 PMCID: PMC11028672 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-012-1271-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2011] [Accepted: 04/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adult patients with relapsed high-grade glioma are a very heterogenous group with, however, an invariably dismal prognosis. We stratified patients with relapsed high-grade glioma treated with re-operation and postoperative dendritic cell (DC) vaccination according to a simple recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) model to predict outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Based on age, pathology, Karnofsky performance score, and mental status, 117 adult patients with relapsed malignant glioma, undergoing re-operation, and postoperative adjuvant dendritic cell (DC) vaccination were stratified into 4 classes. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated for each class of this HGG-IMMUNO RPA model. Extent of resection was documented but not included in the prognostic model. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates revealed significant (p < 0.0001) differences among the 4 HGG-IMMUNO RPA classes. Long-term survivors, surviving more than 24 months after the re-operation and vaccination, are seen in 54.5, 26.7, 11.5, and 0 % for the classes I, II, III, and IV respectively. CONCLUSION This HGG-IMMUNO RPA classification is able to predict overall survival in a large group of adult patients with a relapsed malignant glioma, treated with re-operation and postoperative adjuvant DC vaccination in the HGG-IMMUNO-2003 cohort comparison trial. The model appears useful for prognostic patient counseling for patients participating in DC vaccination trials. A substantial number of long-term survivors after relapse are seen in class I to III, but not in class IV patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven De Vleeschouwer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
99
|
Katsoulakis E, Beal K, Yamada Y. Image guidance in malignant gliomas: a focused strategy. CNS Oncol 2012; 1:131-6. [PMID: 25057863 DOI: 10.2217/cns.12.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for malignant gliomas is maximal surgical cytoreduction followed by concurrent chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. Chemotherapy adds a modest improvement in overall survival. Unfortunately, tumor recurrence is the rule and typically occurs at the initial site of disease. Salvage reirradiation may be a useful approach in selected patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Image-guided technology coupled with highly conformal treatment planning techniques have allowed the safe delivery of high-dose radiotherapy in the setting of tumor recurrence. Defining the optimal combination of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with chemotherapy is under investigation. In this perspective, we examine the role of image guidance in malignant gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Katsoulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
100
|
Zinn PO, Sathyan P, Mahajan B, Bruyere J, Hegi M, Majumder S, Colen RR. A novel volume-age-KPS (VAK) glioblastoma classification identifies a prognostic cognate microRNA-gene signature. PLoS One 2012; 7:e41522. [PMID: 22870228 PMCID: PMC3411674 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2012] [Accepted: 06/21/2012] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have established Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) prognostic and predictive models based on age and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), while very few studies evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of preoperative MR-imaging. However, to date, there is no simple preoperative GBM classification that also correlates with a highly prognostic genomic signature. Thus, we present for the first time a biologically relevant, and clinically applicable tumor Volume, patient Age, and KPS (VAK) GBM classification that can easily and non-invasively be determined upon patient admission. METHODS We quantitatively analyzed the volumes of 78 GBM patient MRIs present in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) corresponding to patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with VAK annotation. The variables were then combined using a simple 3-point scoring system to form the VAK classification. A validation set (N = 64) from both the TCGA and Rembrandt databases was used to confirm the classification. Transcription factor and genomic correlations were performed using the gene pattern suite and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. RESULTS VAK-A and VAK-B classes showed significant median survival differences in discovery (P = 0.007) and validation sets (P = 0.008). VAK-A is significantly associated with P53 activation, while VAK-B shows significant P53 inhibition. Furthermore, a molecular gene signature comprised of a total of 25 genes and microRNAs was significantly associated with the classes and predicted survival in an independent validation set (P = 0.001). A favorable MGMT promoter methylation status resulted in a 10.5 months additional survival benefit for VAK-A compared to VAK-B patients. CONCLUSIONS The non-invasively determined VAK classification with its implication of VAK-specific molecular regulatory networks, can serve as a very robust initial prognostic tool, clinical trial selection criteria, and important step toward the refinement of genomics-based personalized therapy for GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal O Zinn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|