51
|
Trends in the use of primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors and neutropenia-related hospitalization in elderly cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in the USA: 1995–2015. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:2637-2649. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05080-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
52
|
Meta-Analysis Comparing Usefulness of Beta Blockers to Preserve Left Ventricular Function During Anthracycline Therapy. Am J Cardiol 2019; 124:789-794. [PMID: 31307662 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the cardioprotective benefit of β blockers in preventing anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) in breast cancer patients. Anthracyclines are the cornerstone treatment for breast cancer. Yet, their use has declined in the last decade due to associated AIC. Although β blockers may protect left ventricular (LV) function, previous trials were underpowered with equivocal results. The authors systematically searched online databases through August 2018 for studies evaluating effectiveness of β blockers in preventing AIC in breast cancer patients. We analyzed 9 studies including 771 patients. Data on converting-enzyme inhibitors, trastuzumab, or other malignancies were excluded. The primary outcome was comparison of postchemotherapy LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between β blocker and placebo. Secondary outcomes were changes in global longitudinal strain, LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and diastolic function parameters, as assessed by 2D echocardiogram and MRI. The mean pre-chemotherapy LVEF was >60% in all studies. Our pooled analysis demonstrated significantly higher LVEF postchemotherapy in the β blocker group in comparison to placebo: mean difference -3.84 with 95% confidence interval [-(6.19 to 1.48) p = 0.001]. The absolute change in EF also favored β blockers: mean difference -3.66 with 95% confidence interval [-(6.20 to 1.12) p = 0.005]. Diastolic function, global longitudinal strain, and LVEDD were also preserved by β blockers, but only LVEDD reached statistical significance. In conclusion, this study suggests that β blockers during anthracycline chemotherapy may prevent cardiotoxicity by preserving LV function.
Collapse
|
53
|
Krohn M, Zoufal V, Mairinger S, Wanek T, Paarmann K, Brüning T, Eiriz I, Brackhan M, Langer O, Pahnke J. Generation and Characterization of an Abcc1 Humanized Mouse Model ( hABCC1flx/flx ) with Knockout Capability. Mol Pharmacol 2019; 96:138-147. [PMID: 31189668 DOI: 10.1124/mol.119.115824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters such as ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), ABCC1 (MRP1), and ABCG2 (BCRP) are well known for their role in rendering cancer cells resistant to chemotherapy. Additionally, recent research provided evidence that, along with other ABC transporters (ABCA1 and ABCA7), they might be cornerstones to tackle neurodegenerative diseases. Overcoming chemoresistance in cancer, understanding drug-drug interactions, and developing efficient and specific drugs that alter ABC transporter function are hindered by a lack of in vivo research models, which are fully predictive for humans. Hence, the humanization of ABC transporters in mice has become a major focus in pharmaceutical and neurodegenerative research. Here, we present a characterization of the first Abcc1 humanized mouse line. To preserve endogenous expression profiles, we chose to generate a knockin mouse model that leads to the expression of a chimeric protein that is fully human except for one amino acid. We found robust mRNA and protein expression within all major organs analyzed (brain, lung, spleen, and kidney). Furthermore, we demonstrate the functionality of the expressed human ABCC1 protein in brain and lungs using functional positron emission tomography imaging in vivo. Through the introduction of loxP sites, we additionally enabled this humanized mouse model for highly sophisticated studies involving cell type-specific transporter ablation. Based on our data, the presented mouse model appears to be a promising tool for the investigation of cell-specific ABCC1 function. It can provide a new basis for better translation of preclinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Krohn
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Viktoria Zoufal
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Severin Mairinger
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Thomas Wanek
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Kristin Paarmann
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Thomas Brüning
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Ivan Eiriz
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Mirjam Brackhan
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Oliver Langer
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| | - Jens Pahnke
- Department of Neuro-/Pathology and Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (M.K., K.P., T.B., I.E., M.B., J.P.); Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, Austrian Institute of Technology, Seibersdorf, Austria (V.Z., S.M., T.W., O.L.); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (O.L.); Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (J.P.); Leibniz-Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle, Germany (J.P.); and Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia (J.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Pondé NF, Zardavas D, Piccart M. Progress in adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019; 16:27-44. [PMID: 30206303 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-018-0089-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with early stage breast cancer has greatly improved in the past three decades. Following the first adjuvant endocrine therapy and chemotherapy trials, continuous improvements of clinical outcomes have been achieved through intense therapeutic escalation, albeit with increased health-care costs and treatment-related toxicities. In contrast to the advances achieved in surgery or radiotherapy, the identification of the patient subgroups that will derive clinical benefit from therapeutic escalation has proved to be a daunting process hindered by a lack of collaboration between scientific groups and by the pace of drug development. In the past few decades, initiatives towards de-escalation of systemic adjuvant treatment have achieved success. Herein, we summarize attempts to escalate and de-escalate adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with breast cancer and argue that new, creative trial designs focused on patients' actual needs rather than on maximizing drug market size are needed. Ultimately, the adoption of effective treatments that do not needlessly expose patients and health-care systems to harm demands extensive international collaboration between academic groups, governments, and pharmaceutical companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noam F Pondé
- Research Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Academic Promoting Team, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Martine Piccart
- Research Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Cui N, Wu F, Lu W, Bai R, Ke B, Liu T, Li L, Lan F, Cui M. Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity is maturation dependent due to the shift from topoisomerase IIα to IIβ in human stem cell derived cardiomyocytes. J Cell Mol Med 2019; 23:4627-4639. [PMID: 31106979 PMCID: PMC6584544 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 03/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is widely used to treat various cancers affecting adults and children; however, its clinical application is limited by its cardiotoxicity. Previous studies have shown that children are more susceptible to the cardiotoxic effects of DOX than adults, which may be related to different maturity levels of cardiomyocyte, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Moreover, researchers investigating DOX-induced cardiotoxicity caused by human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have shown that dexrazoxane, the recognized cardioprotective drug for treating DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, does not alleviate the toxicity of DOX on hiPSC-CMs cultured for 30 days. We have suggested that this may be ascribed to the immaturity of the 30 days hiPSC-CMs. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of DOX induced cardiotoxicity in cardiomyocytes of different maturity. We selected 30-day-old and 60-day-old hiPSC-CMs (day 30 and day 60 groups), which we term 'immature' and 'relatively mature' hiPSC-CMs, respectively. The day 30 CMs were found to be more susceptible to DOX than the day 60 CMs. DOX leads to more ROS (reactive oxygen species) production in the day 60 CMs than in the relatively immature group due to increased mitochondria number. Moreover, the day 60 CMs mainly expressed topoisomerase IIβ presented less severe DNA damage, whereas the day 30 CMs dominantly expressed topoisomerase IIα exhibited much more severe DNA damage. These results suggest that immature cardiomyocytes are more sensitive to DOX as a result of a higher concentration of topoisomerase IIα, which leads to more DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Cui
- Department of CardiologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
- Department of RespirationThe Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
| | - Fujian Wu
- Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision MedicineAnzhen Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Wen‐Jing Lu
- Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision MedicineAnzhen Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Rui Bai
- Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision MedicineAnzhen Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Bingbing Ke
- Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision MedicineAnzhen Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Taoyan Liu
- Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision MedicineAnzhen Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Lei Li
- Department of CardiologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Feng Lan
- Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision MedicineAnzhen Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Ming Cui
- Department of CardiologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Fragmented QRS formation and its predictors in patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. J Electrocardiol 2019; 54:5-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
57
|
Chen WR, Deng JP, Wang J, Sun JY, He ZY, Wu SG. Impact of 21-Gene Recurrence Score on Chemotherapy Decision in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of Breast with Nodal Micrometastases. Cancer Res Treat 2019; 51:1437-1448. [PMID: 30913871 PMCID: PMC6790862 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2018.611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on predicting prognosis and chemotherapy decision in node micrometastases (N1mi) breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods Patients with stage T1-2N1mi and estrogen receptor-positive IDC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were included. The associations of 21-gene RS with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), chemotherapy decision, and benefit of chemotherapy were analyzed. Results We identified 4,758 patients including 1,403 patients (29.5%) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In the traditional RS cutoffs, 2,831 (59.5%), 1,634 (34.3%), and 293 (6.2%) patients were in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS groups, respectively. In 3,853 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status available, most patients were HER2-negative disease (98.3%). A higher RS was independently related to chemotherapy receipt, and 14.0%, 47.7%, and 77.8% of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS groups received chemotherapy, respectively. The multivariate analysis indicated that a higher RS was related to worse BCSS (p < 0.001). The 5-year BCSS rates were 99.3%, 97.4%, and 91.9% in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk RS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). However, chemotherapy receipt did not correlate with better BCSS in low-, intermediate-, or high-risk RS groups. There were similar trends using Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment RS cutoffs. Conclusion The 21-gene RS does predict outcome and impact on chemotherapy decision of N1mi breast IDC. Large cohort and long-term outcomes studies are needed to identify the effects of chemotherapy in N1mi patients by different 21-gene RS groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Rong Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zhuhai Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Zhuhai, China
| | - Jia-Peng Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jia-Yuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Watanuki R, Hayashida T, Kawai Y, Kikuchi M, Nakashoji A, Yokoe T, Toyota T, Seki T, Takahashi M, Kitagawa Y. Optimal use of anthracycline-free perioperative chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 24:807-814. [PMID: 30810890 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01420-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In adjuvant settings of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by taxane and trastuzumab is a standard regimen. Recent studies have reported the use of anthracycline-free adjuvant chemotherapy in selected HER2-positive breast cancer patients. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to identify the characteristics of HER2-positive breast cancer patients for whom anthracyclines can be safely omitted. METHODS A total of 238 women were diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer and treated with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015 at Keio University Hospital. They were divided in two cohorts: an "anthracycline" cohort of 112 anthracycline-treated women and a "no anthracycline" cohort of 126 anthracycline-untreated women. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The 3-year disease-free survival rates in the no-anthracycline and anthracycline cohorts were 91.3% and 93.1%, respectively (P = 0.692). After using a statistical method with inverse probability of treatment weighting to minimize the selection bias, no significant differences were observed between the two cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival: 1.042; P = 0.909). Stratified by tumor size, no significant differences were observed between the two cohorts in the cT1N0 and cT2N0 subsets (P = 0.516 and P = 0.579, respectively). The recurrence rate was low among patients who achieved pathological complete response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that anthracyclines can be safely omitted in selected patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, who have cT1N0 or cT2N0 and achieved pathological complete response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rurina Watanuki
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tetsu Hayashida
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Yuko Kawai
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ayako Nakashoji
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Takamichi Yokoe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tomoka Toyota
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tomoko Seki
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Maiko Takahashi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Ni C, Ma P, Wang R, Lou X, Liu X, Qin Y, Xue R, Blasig I, Erben U, Qin Z. Doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity involves IFNγ‐mediated metabolic reprogramming in cardiomyocytes. J Pathol 2019; 247:320-332. [PMID: 30426505 DOI: 10.1002/path.5192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Ni
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
| | - Pan Ma
- Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceuticals, CAS‐University of Tokyo Joint Laboratory of Structural Virology and Immunology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing PR China
| | - Ruirui Wang
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
| | - Xiaohan Lou
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
| | - Xiaomeng Liu
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
| | - Yue Qin
- Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceuticals, CAS‐University of Tokyo Joint Laboratory of Structural Virology and Immunology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing PR China
| | - Rui Xue
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
| | - Ingolf Blasig
- Leibniz Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie Berlin‐Buch Germany
| | - Ulrike Erben
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
- Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceuticals, CAS‐University of Tokyo Joint Laboratory of Structural Virology and Immunology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing PR China
| | - Zhihai Qin
- Medical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou University Zhengzhou PR China
- Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceuticals, CAS‐University of Tokyo Joint Laboratory of Structural Virology and Immunology, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing PR China
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Xie H, Liu J, Yu S, Chen Y, Zheng M, Deng Y, Wang S, Jiang J, Li Y, Li H, Kang H, Zhang C, Zhang GJ, Su F, Cheng A, Wang S. Patterns of Use of Docetaxel-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among Chinese Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Observational Study. Adv Ther 2019; 36:131-146. [PMID: 30511279 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0841-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy is frequently used in the treatment of operable early breast cancer (EBC). This study investigated patterns of docetaxel use in patients with EBC in real-world clinical practice in China. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study of Chinese women with operable breast cancer in tier 1 non-oncology-specific hospitals and other city hospitals in China. Adult Chinese female patients (≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed breast cancer who underwent surgery and received docetaxel-containing adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. The primary end point of the study was to assess patterns of docetaxel use for adjuvant therapy in Chinese clinical practice. Secondary end points included factors associated with treatment selection, patterns of G-CSF use and safety. RESULTS In total, 502 patients were enrolled, 475 of whom were included in the analysis. The results showed that 31.6% of patients received docetaxel and anthracyclines in combination, 47.2% received docetaxel and anthracyclines sequentially, 18.5% received docetaxel and other medication either in combination or sequentially and 2.7% received 'other' chemotherapy regimens. Factors influencing selection of docetaxel/anthracycline in combination versus sequentially included age, breast cancer subgroup, PR status, and preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 258 (54.3%), 35 (7.4%), and 108 (22.7%) patients received G-CSF as primary prevention, secondary prevention and treatment, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 54.5% (259) of patients, and the most frequently reported TEAEs (≥ 5% of patients) included bone marrow failure (10.1%), granulocytopenia (9.9%), nausea (8.8%) and vomiting (6.9%). Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were reported by 10 and 12 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Docetaxel for adjuvant chemotherapy of operable EBC in China was most commonly given in combination or sequentially with anthracyclines. The study also showed that in China G-CSF is most frequently used as primary prophylactic, and no unexpected safety events were observed during docetaxel treatment. FUNDING Sanofi (China).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Xie
- Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Jinping Liu
- Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Sichuan Medical Science Academy, Chengdu, China
| | - Shiyou Yu
- Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China
| | - Yiding Chen
- Women's Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Min Zheng
- Second Affiliated Hospital Wen Zhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yongchuan Deng
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shu Wang
- People's Hospital Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Jiang
- Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yafen Li
- Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, College of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huiping Li
- Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Kang
- Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chunhui Zhang
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Guo-Jun Zhang
- Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Fengxi Su
- Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Aiqun Cheng
- Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shui Wang
- Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Caparica R, Bruzzone M, Poggio F, Ceppi M, de Azambuja E, Lambertini M. Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 174:27-37. [PMID: 30465156 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5055-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer consists generally in an anthracycline and taxane-based regimen (A+T). The TC (docetaxel and cyclophosphamide) regimen arises as a potential alternative, although individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of TC over A+T. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing 6 cycles of TC versus sequential A+T in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify RCTs comparing TC versus A+T. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Subgroup analyses of DFS according to hormone receptor status, lymph node involvement, and menopausal status were performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS and OS were extracted from each trial, and a pooled analysis was conducted using the random-effect model. The Higgins' I-Squared Test was used to quantify heterogeneity. RESULTS Seven RCTs were included (12,741 patients). Overall, no difference was observed between TC and A+T in DFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.96-1.20) and OS (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.90-1.22). A trend favoring A+T was observed in hormone receptor-negative (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.34) and N2 patients (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.82-1.90). Emesis/vomiting, mucositis, thrombocytopenia and sensory neuropathy were significantly more frequent with A+T. CONCLUSION As adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer, sequential A+T regimen was associated with increased risk of toxicities and no clear survival benefit as compared to 6 cycles of TC. Higher-risk patients may benefit the most from A+T, whilst TC may be an efficacious and less toxic alternative for lower-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Caparica
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Boulevard de Waterloo 121, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Abstract
Heart failure and breast cancer have shared risks and morbidities. Multimodality therapies for breast cancer, including conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapeutics, radiation therapy, and hormonal agents, may make patients more susceptible to asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction and clinical heart failure during and after treatment. New or preexisting left ventricular dysfunction may lead to interruptions in cancer treatment and limit options of breast cancer systemic therapy, leading to adverse outcomes. Early recognition and management of cardiovascular risk factors before, during, and after cancer treatment are of utmost importance. This review presents advances, challenges, and opportunities for cardiovascular care in contemporary breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zakaria Almuwaqqat
- Department of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Jane L Meisel
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Ana Barac
- MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Susmita Parashar
- Department of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Ibraheem AF, Press DJ, Olopade OI, Huo D. Community clinical practice patterns and mortality in patients with intermediate oncotype DX recurrence scores: Who benefits from chemotherapy? Cancer 2018; 125:213-222. [PMID: 30387876 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) is used as a tool for making decisions about chemotherapy for patients who have hormone receptor (estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. There is no benefit from chemotherapy among patients aged ≥50 years who have lymph node-negative disease and an RS from 11 to 25, but the benefit of chemotherapy in the lymph node-positive group remains unknown. METHODS On the basis of data from the National Cancer Data Base between 2010 and 2014, a nationwide, retrospective cohort study included 73,185 women who had stage I through IIIA breast cancer and an RS between 11 and 30. RESULTS Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of death among patients who had lymph node-positive breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.74; P < .001) after adjusting for other prognostic factors in a multivariable Cox model. The 5-year survival gain ranged from 1.3% (RS 11-17 subgroup), to 3.3% (RS 18-25 subgroup), and to 6.7% (RS 26-30 subgroup). Among patients who had lymph node-negative disease, chemotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of death for those with an RS from 25 to 30 (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.96; P = .03; 5-year survival gain, 1.8%), but there was no benefit from chemotherapy for patients who had an RS from 11 to 17 (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.61-1.55; P = .90), and there was a marginally significant benefit for women who had an RS from 18 to 25 (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00; P = .05). Similar results were observed using propensity score-matching method. CONCLUSIONS The benefit of chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer who have an intermediate RS is driven in a nonlinear fashion by RS: the higher the RS, the larger the absolute benefit. Findings from this study underscore the utility of real-world data to inform joint decision making in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abiola F Ibraheem
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David J Press
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Munster P, Krop IE, LoRusso P, Ma C, Siegel BA, Shields AF, Molnár I, Wickham TJ, Reynolds J, Campbell K, Hendriks BS, Adiwijaya BS, Geretti E, Moyo V, Miller KD. Safety and pharmacokinetics of MM-302, a HER2-targeted antibody-liposomal doxorubicin conjugate, in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation study. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:1086-1093. [PMID: 30361524 PMCID: PMC6219487 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This phase 1 dose-escalation trial studied MM-302, a novel HER2-targeted PEGylated antibody-liposomal doxorubicin conjugate, in HER2-positive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. METHODS Patients were enrolled in four cohorts: MM-302 monotherapy (8, 16, 30, 40, and 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks [q4w]); MM-302 (30 or 40 mg/m2 q4w) plus trastuzumab (4 mg/kg q2w); MM-302 (30 mg/m2) plus trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) q3w; MM-302 (30 mg/m2) plus trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (450 mg/m2) q3w. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were treated. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue and nausea. Grade 3/4 AEs of special interest included neutropenia, fatigue, mucosal inflammation, anemia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. The MTD was not reached. With MM-302 ≥ 30 mg/m2, overall response rate (ORR) was 13% and median progression-free survival (mPFS) 7.4 months (95% CI: 3·5-10·9) in all arms. In 25 anthracycline-naïve patients, ORR was 28·0% and mPFS 10·9 months (95% CI: 1·8-15·3). Imaging with 64Cu-labeled MM-302 visualized tumor-drug penetrance in tumors throughout the body, including the brain. CONCLUSION MM-302 monotherapy, in combination with trastuzumab, or trastuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. The selected phase 2 MM-302 dose was 30 mg/m2 plus 6 mg/kg trastuzumab q3w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Munster
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Cynthia Ma
- Department of Medicine and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Anthony F Shields
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - István Molnár
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Thomas J Wickham
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Joseph Reynolds
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Karen Campbell
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Bart S Hendriks
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Bambang S Adiwijaya
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Elena Geretti
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Victor Moyo
- Research and Development, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
The comparison of anthracycline-based and non-anthracycline-based regimens in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2-positive non-metastatic breast cancers. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2018; 22:108-112. [PMID: 30150888 PMCID: PMC6103234 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2018.77048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of the study This study aimed to assess the efficacy of anthracycline-based (AB) and non-anthracycline-based (nAB) adjuvant therapies in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive non-metastatic BC (nMBC) patients. Material and methods This retrospective study included women with HER2-positive BCs (stage I–III) treated with trastuzumab from 2008 to 2017. The patients were divided into two groups, including 196 patients in group AB and 67 in group nAB. Results Cox’s proportional hazard regression analysis showed no unfavourable predictors for five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) except for stage and hormone therapy. The OS rate was 67.9% in group AB and 80.6% in group nAB (p = 0.630). The DFS rate was 61.6% in group AB compared with 67.1% in group nAB (p = 0.447). Conclusions The results showed no difference between the efficacies of AB and nAB regimens in HER2-positive nMBCs in adjuvant setting. Therefore, selecting the nAB regimen can reduce the serious damage caused by the AB regimen.
Collapse
|
66
|
A SIRT1-centered circuitry regulates breast cancer stemness and metastasis. Oncogene 2018; 37:6299-6315. [PMID: 30038266 PMCID: PMC6283862 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0370-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cancer stem cell (CSC)-dictated intratumor heterogeneity accounts for the majority of drug-resistance and distant metastases of breast cancers. Here, we identify a SIRT1-PRRX1-KLF4-ALDH1 circuitry, which couples CSCs, chemo-resistance, metastasis and aging. Pro-longevity protein SIRT1 deacetylates and stabilizes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal-transition (EMT) inducer PRRX1, which inhibits the transcription of core stemness factor KLF4. Loss of SIRT1 destabilizes PRRX1, disinhibits KLF4, and activates the transcription of ALDH1, which induces and functionally marks CSCs, resulting in chemo-resistance and metastatic relapse. Clinically, the level of PRRX1 is positively linked to SIRT1, whereas KLF4 is reversely correlated. Importantly, KLF4 inhibitor Kenpaullone sensitizes breast cancer cells and xenograft tumors to Paclitaxel and improves therapeutic effects. Our findings delineate a SIRT1-centered circuitry that regulates CSC origination, and targeting this pathway might be a promising therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
|
67
|
Anderson C, Smitherman AB, Nichols HB. Conditional relative survival among long-term survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers. Cancer 2018; 124:3037-3043. [PMID: 29742278 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have examined long-term outcomes after childhood cancer, but few address outcomes for adolescent and young adult (AYA; those aged 15-39 years) cancer survivors. Conditional survival reflects changing mortality risk with time since cancer diagnosis and is a useful measure for planning long-term follow-up care. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry 9 database, the authors identified a cohort of AYA patients diagnosed with a first malignant cancer between 1973 and 2009 and followed through 2014. They estimated 5-year relative survival at the time of diagnosis and at each additional year survived up to 25 years after diagnosis, conditional on the individual being alive at the beginning of that year. RESULTS A total of 205,954 AYA patients with cancer were identified. Thyroid cancer, melanoma, testicular cancer, breast cancer, lymphoma, leukemia, and central nervous system (CNS) tumors comprised 67% of all cancers. For all cancers combined, 5-year relative survival was 84.5% (95% confidence interval, 84.3%-84.7%) at 1 year after diagnosis and 94.0% (95% CI, 93.9%-94.2%) at 5 years. The relative survival first exceeded 95%, reflecting minimal excess mortality compared with the general population, at 7 years. Patients with thyroid cancer, testicular cancer, melanoma, and breast cancer reached a relative survival of >95% at the time of diagnosis and at 1, 3, and 18 years after diagnosis, respectively. Estimates for those with Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia were >95% at 6 and 13 years, respectively, but declined to <95% at 20 years. AYA individuals with CNS tumors did not reach 95% by 25 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS For AYA survivors of breast cancer, CNS tumors, and hematologic malignancies, long-term excess mortality should be considered when planning follow-up care. Cancer 2018;124:3037-43. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Anderson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Andrew B Smitherman
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Muehlberg F, Funk S, Zange L, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Blaszczyk E, Schulz A, Ghani S, Reichardt A, Reichardt P, Schulz-Menger J. Native myocardial T1 time can predict development of subsequent anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Fail 2018; 5:620-629. [PMID: 29673122 PMCID: PMC6073029 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims This study aims to assess subclinical changes in functional and morphological myocardial magnetic resonance parameters very early into an anthracycline treatment, which may predict subsequent development of anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy (aCMP). Methods and results Thirty sarcoma patients with planned anthracycline‐based chemotherapy (360–400 mg/m2 doxorubicin‐equivalent) were recruited. Median treatment time was 19.1 ± 2.1 weeks. Enrolled individuals received three cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies (before treatment, 48 h after first anthracycline treatment, and upon completion of treatment). Native T1 mapping (modified Look–Locker inversion recovery 5s(3s)3s), T2 mapping, and extracellular volume maps were acquired in addition to a conventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance with steady‐state free precession cine imaging at 1.5 T. Patients were given 0.2 mmol/kg gadoteridol for extracellular volume quantification and late gadolinium enhancement imaging. Development of relevant aCMP was defined as drop of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by >10%. For analysis, 23 complete data sets were available. Nine patients developed aCMP with LVEF reduction >10% until end of chemotherapy. Baseline LVEF was not different between patients with and without subsequent aCMP. When assessed 48 h after first dose of antracyclines, patients with subsequent aCMP had significantly lower native myocardial T1 times compared with before therapy (1002.0 ± 37.9 vs. 956.5 ± 29.2 ms, P < 0.01) than patients who did not develop aCMP (990.9 ± 56.4 vs. 978.4 ± 57.4 ms, P > 0.05). Patients with aCMP had decreased left ventricular mass upon completion of therapy (86.9 ± 24.5 vs. 81.1 ± 22.3 g; P = 0.02), while patients without aCMP did not show a change in left ventricular mass (81.8 ± 21.0 vs. 79.2 ± 18.1 g; P > 0.05). No patient developed new myocardial scars or compact myocardial fibrosis under chemotherapy. Conclusions Early decrease of T1 times 48 h after first treatment with anthracyclines can predict the development of subsequent aCMP after completion of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Muehlberg
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Funk
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonora Zange
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany.,Clinic Agatharied, Department of Cardiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich, Hausham, Germany
| | - Edyta Blaszczyk
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Schulz
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Saeed Ghani
- Department for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Sarcoma Center, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annete Reichardt
- Department for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Sarcoma Center, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Reichardt
- Department for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Sarcoma Center, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jeanette Schulz-Menger
- Working Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Experimental and Clinical Research Center - a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, HELIOS Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Hu Y, Zhu X, Zhao R, Wang J, Song Y, Nie G, Tang H, Wang Y. Doxorubicin and paclitaxel carried by methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) is superior than traditional drug-delivery methods. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2018. [PMID: 29527969 DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the advantages of nanomaterial methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (mPEG-PLGA) encapsulated doxorubicin (D/DOX) and paclitaxel (T/TAX; mPEG-PLGA-DT) over free form of DOX and TAX (DOX/TAX). MATERIALS & METHODS Metabonomics was conducted to characterize the systemic metabolic response of allograft breast cancer model mice to mPEG-PLGA-DT and DOX/TAX treatments. RESULTS Breast tumor growth induced metabolic reprogram in serum and multiple organs. DOX/TAX treatment could ameliorate the elevated energy and nucleotides demands in some organs while mPEG-PLGA-DT treatment showed outstanding therapeutic outcomes in restoring the metabolic phenotypes of serum and kidney from tumor-bearing mice to the healthy state. CONCLUSION This investigation proved the biological advantages of mPEG-PLGA-DT over DOX/TAX in molecular level through the comparison between their metabolic responses in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yili Hu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Atomic & Molecular Physics, Wuhan Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics & Mathematics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, PR China
| | - Xiaoyang Zhu
- CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Atomic & Molecular Physics, Wuhan Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics & Mathematics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, PR China
| | - Ruifang Zhao
- CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience & Technology, Beijing 100190, PR China
| | - Jin Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Atomic & Molecular Physics, Wuhan Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics & Mathematics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, PR China
| | - Yipeng Song
- CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Atomic & Molecular Physics, Wuhan Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics & Mathematics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, PR China
| | - Guangjun Nie
- CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience & Technology, Beijing 100190, PR China
| | - Huiru Tang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Atomic & Molecular Physics, Wuhan Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics & Mathematics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, PR China.,State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics & Development, Metabolomics & Systems Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, PR China
| | - Yulan Wang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Atomic & Molecular Physics, Wuhan Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics & Mathematics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, PR China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis & Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Cancer Treatment. JACC-HEART FAILURE 2018; 6:87-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
71
|
Xu B, Shao Z, Wang S, Jiang Z, Hu X, Zhang X, Li X, Liu J, Li M, Wang S. Treatment patterns for adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer in China: A pooled retrospective analysis of four observational studies. Chin J Cancer Res 2018; 30:327-339. [PMID: 30046227 DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.03.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy is frequently used for operable early breast cancer (EBC). This study investigated patterns of use of docetaxel (T) in real-life clinical practice in China. Methods This was a retrospective pooled analysis of the Asia-Pacific Breast Initiatives (APBI) I (2006-2008) and II (2009-2011) registries, and two Chinese observational studies; BC STATE (2011-2014) and BC Local Registry (2007-2010). Female Chinese adults (≥18 years) with operable breast cancer treated with docetaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. The primary endpoint was assessment of treatment patterns and patient profiles. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with choice of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Results Data from 3,020 patients were included. The most frequently used adjuvant regimen was docetaxel/anthracycline combination [n=1,421 (47.1%); of whom 52.0% received T/epirubicin (E)/cyclophosphamide (C)], followed by docetaxel/other [n=705 (23.3%); of whom 72.8% received TC], docetaxel/anthracycline sequential [n=447 (14.8%); of whom 40.9% and 39.6% received 5-Fu/EC-T and EC-T, respectively], and " other" [n=447 (14.8%); of whom 91.5% received T]. A significant association was found between adjuvant therapy with docetaxel/anthracycline combination and patient weight, menopausal status and estrogen receptor status. Conclusions Real-world data revealed that docetaxel/anthracycline combination is the most commonly used category of docetaxel-based adjuvant therapy for patients with operable breast cancer in China; of which TEC is the most frequently used regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binghe Xu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Shui Wang
- Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Zefei Jiang
- Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing 100071, China
| | - Xichun Hu
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaohua Zhang
- the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
| | - Xiru Li
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jinping Liu
- Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
| | - Mengquan Li
- the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Shu Wang
- Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Rosenstock AS, Niu J, Giordano SH, Zhao H, Wolff AC, Chavez-MacGregor M. Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after adjuvant chemotherapy: A population-based study among older breast cancer patients. Cancer 2017; 124:899-906. [PMID: 29236294 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy for early breast cancer is associated with a small risk of developing myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and/or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The aim of this study was to determine the risk of developing AML or MDS after modern adjuvant chemotherapy in older breast cancer patients and to further define the risk of individual chemotherapy regimens. METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer from 2003 to 2009 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare and Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare linked databases. The development of AML/MDS, chemotherapy use, and comorbidities were identified with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Analyses included descriptive statistics, cumulative incidences, and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard of AML/MDS after adjustments for clinically relevant covariates. RESULTS In all, 92,110 patients were included; after a median follow-up of 85 months, the overall rates per 1000 person-years were 0.65 for AML and 1.56 for MDS. Patients who received an anthracycline (A) or anthracycline and taxane (A+T) regimen were more likely to develop AML (hazard ratio [HR] for A, 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.50; HR for A+T, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.22-2.30) or MDS (HR for A, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.70-2.80; HR for A+T, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.29-2.03) than patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Patients using docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) were not at increased risk for AML or MDS. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a small but significant increase in the risk of AML and MDS, especially with regimens that include A. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm that risk is not increased with the recently adopted TC regimen. Cancer 2018;124:899-906. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aron S Rosenstock
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jiangong Niu
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Kota KJ, Brufsky AM. The Double-Edged Sword: Controversies in Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-017-0254-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
74
|
Li L, Ni J, Li M, Chen J, Han L, Zhu Y, Kong D, Mao J, Wang Y, Zhang B, Zhu M, Gao X, Fan G. Ginsenoside Rg3 micelles mitigate doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and enhance its anticancer efficacy. Drug Deliv 2017; 24:1617-1630. [PMID: 29063791 PMCID: PMC8241051 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1391893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is one of the most effective chemotherapy agents used in the treatment of hematological and solid tumors, however, it causes dose-related cardiotoxicity that may lead to heart failure in patients. One of the major reasons was increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Ginsenoside Rg3 (Rg3), was powerful free radical scavengers and possessed cardioprotective effects. Nevertheless, Rg3 has low aqueous solubility and oral bioavailability, limiting its effects. Herein, we encapsulated Rg3 through spontaneous self-assembly of Pluronic F127 to improve its solubility and oral bioavailability. Moreover, co-administering Rg3 in Pluronic F127 micelles with doxorubicin can mitigate the cardiotoxicity, with ameliorating mitochondrial and metabolic function, improving calcium handling, and decreasing ROS production. In addition, it can improve the anticancer efficacy of doxorubicin. Therefore, our study provides a rational strategy for further developing a potentially viable adjunct-supportive treatment for reducing toxicity and increasing efficiency on chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Li
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Jingyu Ni
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Min Li
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Jingrui Chen
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Lifeng Han
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Yan Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Deling Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Jingyuan Mao
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Yi Wang
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China
| | - Boli Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Meifeng Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Xiumei Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Guanwei Fan
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
- State Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Yang FO, Hsu NC, Moi SH, Lu YC, Hsieh CM, Chang KJ, Chen DR, Tu CW, Wang HC, Hou MF. Efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective case-control study. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2017; 14:198-203. [PMID: 29045014 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has comparable efficacy and differing toxicity from conventional anthracyclines used to treat advanced breast cancer. This study compared disease-free survival and toxicity between PLD-based and conventional anthracycline-based regimens as adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer. METHODS We analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) rates, and adverse events in 102 women with early-stage (I-IIIa) breast cancer who received adjuvant PLD-based chemotherapy from 2002 to 2008. Each patient was matched for age, stage at diagnosis, HER-2 expression and hormone therapy use to a patient treated with an epirubicin-based regimen. Fisher's exact and Pearson's chi-square tests were used for categorical data analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used to analyze DFS. RESULTS DFS at 5 years was 81.3% for PLD-based regimen and 82.3% for epirubicin-based regimen. This difference was not significant (p = 0.939). Stage IIIa disease was associated with a shorter DFS in univariate analysis (p = 0.048). In multivariate analysis that controlled for adjuvant treatment, age at diagnosis, stage, HER-2 expression, type of surgery and hormone and radiation therapy, stage IIIa disease (P = 0.023) and lack of hormone therapy (P = 0.024) were each independently associated with shorter DFS. Adverse events were evaluated, and with the exception of hand-foot syndrome, more grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurred in patients who received epirubicin-based regimens than in those given PLD-based regimens. CONCLUSION For patients with early-stage breast cancer who received PLD-based adjuvant chemotherapy, 5-year DFS was comparable and toxicity was acceptable, yet different from those of patients who received epirubicin-based regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fu Ou Yang
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Nicholas C Hsu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Sin-Hua Moi
- Breast Cancer Society of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Che Lu
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | | | - King-Jen Chang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dar-Ren Chen
- Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Tu
- Department of Surgery, Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Hwei-Chung Wang
- Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Feng Hou
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
The Impact of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Guideline Changes in Pap Tests on Annual Chlamydia Test Rates. J Adolesc Health 2017; 61:440-445. [PMID: 28754585 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess impact of the 2009 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Pap guideline changes on chlamydia testing rates among sexually active young women. METHODS The study included sexually active women aged 15-25 years enrolled in commercial health plans from 2005 to 2014. We identified sexually active women by diagnosis, procedure, and drug codes in inpatient, outpatient, and drug claims databases. We identified Pap tests and chlamydia tests among sexually active adolescents (15-20 years) and young adults (21-25 years) over time. Using piecewise regression models, we compared the change in chlamydia testing rates before and after 2009 ACOG guidelines. RESULTS From 2005 to 2014, chlamydia testing rates in sexually active women increased from 23% to 37% among adolescents and from 24% to 43% among young adults. Although the overall increase in chlamydia testing was positive, the annual rate of change in chlamydia testing (slope) decreased significantly after the 2009 ACOG guideline change from 1.9% before to 1.0% after for adolescents (p < .05) and from 2.5% to 1.7% for young adults (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS Although chlamydia test rates are increasing among sexually active women aged 15-25 years from 2005 to 2014, the slower growth in chlamydia testing rate after 2009 may relate to the change in the Pap testing guidelines. Our finding that more than half of sexually active women aged 15-25 years did not have chlamydia testing and that the rate of increased chlamydia testing slowed after 2009 suggests that interventions to improve chlamydia testing apart from combining with Pap testing are still needed.
Collapse
|
77
|
Florido R, Smith KL, Cuomo KK, Russell SD. Cardiotoxicity From Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) Targeted Therapies. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:JAHA.117.006915. [PMID: 28939718 PMCID: PMC5634312 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.006915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Florido
- Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Karen L Smith
- Breast and Ovarian Cancer Program, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
78
|
Weight gain in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer: is it menopausal status or something else? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 167:235-248. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4501-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
79
|
Nowsheen S, Viscuse PV, O’Sullivan CC, Sandhu NP, Haddad TC, Blaes A, Klemp J, Nhola L, Herrmann J, Ruddy KJ. Incidence, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Cardiac Toxicity from Trastuzumab in Patients with Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2017; 9:173-182. [PMID: 29225726 PMCID: PMC5718359 DOI: 10.1007/s12609-017-0249-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Treatment with trastuzumab is a cornerstone of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer treatment, but carries an unfortunate risk of toxicity to the cardiovascular system. Here we review recent findings on trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity, focusing on its incidence, diagnosis, and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Screening with multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram (ECHO) is recommended to assess cardiac function prior to and during trastuzumab therapy. Because trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity is typically reversible, cessation of trastuzumab and/or administration of first line heart failure agents effectively restores cardiac function in most cases. Severe trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity is rare enough that the risk-benefit ratio still weighs in favor of its use in the vast majority of patients with HER2+ breast cancer. SUMMARY An improved understanding of the pathophysiology underlying trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity and the identification of patients at highest risk will allow us to continue to safely administer trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somaira Nowsheen
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and the Mayo Clinic Medical Scientist Training Program
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne Blaes
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota
| | - Jennifer Klemp
- Division of Clinical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center
| | - Lara Nhola
- Division of Cardiology Research, Mayo Clinic
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Yu AF, Mukku RB, Verma S, Liu JE, Oeffinger KC, Steingart RM, Hudis CA, Dang CT. Cardiac safety of non-anthracycline trastuzumab-based therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 166:241-247. [PMID: 28710537 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4362-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 06/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Trastuzumab improves overall survival for women with HER2-positive breast cancer but is associated with cardiotoxicity, especially when administered after anthracyclines. Use of non-anthracycline trastuzumab-based regimens is rising, particularly for patients with low-risk disease or with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study to assess the cardiac safety of trastuzumab without anthracyclines outside of a clinical trial setting. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer receiving non-anthracycline trastuzumab-based therapy between January 2010 and June 2014. Cardiovascular risk factors, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and treatment interruption data were collected. The primary outcome was a cardiac event (CE), defined by New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure or cardiac death. The secondary outcome was a significant asymptomatic decline of LVEF (>10% to <55% or >16% from baseline). RESULTS A total of 165 patients were identified with a median age of 59 years (range 32-85 years). Seventy (42%) had hypertension, 52 (32%) had hyperlipidemia, 29 (18%) had diabetes, and 5 (3%) had coronary artery disease. All patients had a LVEF >50% (median 67%; range 50-80%) at baseline. Two (1.2%) patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors developed a CE. After discontinuation of trastuzumab, both patients had recovery of LVEF to >50% and resolution of heart failure symptoms. Ten (6.1%) patients developed significant asymptomatic LVEF decline during trastuzumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS The overall incidence of symptomatic heart failure and asymptomatic LVEF decline among patients receiving trastuzumab without anthracyclines remains low. These findings suggest that less intensive cardiac monitoring may be appropriate during trastuzumab therapy without anthracyclines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony F Yu
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Roy B Mukku
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shivani Verma
- Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer E Liu
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Department of Medicine, Division of Survivorship and Supportive Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard M Steingart
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Clifford A Hudis
- Department of Medicine, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Chau T Dang
- Department of Medicine, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Schnadig ID, Agajanian R, Dakhil C, Gabrail N, Vacirca J, Taylor C, Wilks S, Braun E, Mosier MC, Geller RB, Schwartzberg L, Vogelzang N. APF530 versus ondansetron, each in a guideline-recommended three-drug regimen, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens: a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Phase III randomized MAGIC trial. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:179-187. [PMID: 28579832 PMCID: PMC5446958 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s129059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND APF530, a novel extended-release granisetron injection, was superior to ondansetron in a guideline-recommended three-drug regimen in preventing delayed-phase chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in the double-blind Phase III Modified Absorption of Granisetron In the prevention of CINV (MAGIC) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS This MAGIC post hoc analysis evaluated CINV prevention efficacy and safety of APF530 versus ondansetron, each with fosaprepitant and dexamethasone, in patient subgroup receiving an anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to APF530 500 mg subcutaneously (granisetron 10 mg) or ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg intravenously (IV) (≤16 mg); stratification was by planned cisplatin ≥50 mg/m2 (yes/no). Patients were to receive fosaprepitant 150 mg IV and dexamethasone 12 mg IV on day 1, then dexamethasone 8 mg orally once daily on day 2 and twice daily on days 3 and 4. Patients were mostly younger females (APF530 arm, mean age 54.1 years, female, 99.3%; ondansetron arm, 53.8 years, female 98.3%). The primary end point was delayed-phase (>24-120 hours) complete response (CR). RESULTS APF530 versus ondansetron regimens achieved numerically better CINV control in delayed and overall (0-120 hours) phases for CR, complete control, total response, rescue medication use, and proportion with no nausea. APF530 trends are consistent with the overall population, although not statistically superior given the underpowered AC subgroup analysis. The APF530 regimen in this population was generally well tolerated, with safety comparable to that of the overall population. CONCLUSION APF530 plus fosaprepitant and dexamethasone effectively prevented CINV among patients receiving AC-based HEC, a large subgroup in whom CINV control has traditionally been challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sharon Wilks
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Michael C Mosier
- Biostatistics, EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
82
|
van den Berg MMGA, Winkels RM, de Kruif JTCM, van Laarhoven HWM, Visser M, de Vries JHM, de Vries YC, Kampman E. Weight change during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:259. [PMID: 28403873 PMCID: PMC5389147 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight gain during chemotherapy in women with breast cancer is commonly reported. However, there are important differences between studies that examined weight change during chemotherapy; e.g. type of chemotherapy, menopausal status, time between body weight measurements and sample size. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to quantify changes in body weight during chemotherapy for women with breast cancer, taking these differences into account. METHODS We identified relevant studies using PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases. The search was limited to human studies published in English up to and including December 2015. Only studies among women with early stage breast cancer treated with chemotherapy, with reported body weight before and after chemotherapy and type of chemotherapy were included. Random-effect models were used, and heterogeneity between studies was explored through stratified analyses and meta-regression. Sensitivity analyses were done to explore whether a specific study markedly affected the results. RESULTS In total 25 papers were found, including data from 2620 women. Overall, body weight increased during chemotherapy: 2.7 kg (95% CI 2.0, 7.5) with a high degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 94.2%). Stratified analyses showed weight gain in all strata, but did not substantially reduce heterogeneity. Univariate meta-regression showed less weight gain in prospective studies compared to chart review studies (-2.0, 95% CI: -3.1, -0.8). Studies including cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimes showed a greater weight gain compared to those that did not (2.2, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.3); and papers published until the year 2000 showed a greater weight gain compared to those published after 2000 (1.9, 95% CI:-0.8, 3.1). In the multivariate models only studies including CMF regimes and studies published until 2000 were associated with significant weight gain of respectively 1.3 and 1.4 kg. CONCLUSION Despite the high heterogeneity, this meta-analysis shows significant weight gain during chemotherapy for women with breast cancer. Weight gain was more pronounced in papers published until 2000 and women receiving CMF as chemotherapy regime. Although weight gain after chemotherapy has decreased over the course of time, weight gain is still substantial and deserves clinical attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M G A van den Berg
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - R M Winkels
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Th C M de Kruif
- Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Academic Medical Center, Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, F4-224, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Visser
- Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J H M de Vries
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Y C de Vries
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Nieuwe Kanaal 9A, 6709, PA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - E Kampman
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Blum JL, Flynn PJ, Yothers G, Asmar L, Geyer CE, Jacobs SA, Robert NJ, Hopkins JO, O'Shaughnessy JA, Dang CT, Gómez HL, Fehrenbacher L, Vukelja SJ, Lyss AP, Paul D, Brufsky AM, Jeong JH, Colangelo LH, Swain SM, Mamounas EP, Jones SE, Wolmark N. Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: The ABC Trials-USOR 06-090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 (NRG Oncology). J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2647-2655. [PMID: 28398846 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.71.4147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) was superior to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in a trial in early breast cancer. However, activity of TC relative to AC regimens with a taxane (TaxAC) is unknown. Methods In a series of three adjuvant trials, women were randomly assigned to TC for six cycles (TC6) or to a standard TaxAC regimen. US Oncology Research (USOR) 06-090 compared TC6 with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC6). National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-46-I/USOR 07132 compared TC6, TAC6, or TC6 plus bevacizumab. NSABP B-49 compared TC6 with several standard AC and taxane combination regimens. Before any analysis of individual trials, a joint efficacy analysis of TC versus the TaxAC regimens was planned, with invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) as the primary end point. Patients who received TC6 plus bevacizumab on NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132 were not included. A hazard ratio (HR) from a stratified Cox model that exceeded 1.18 for TC6 versus TaxAC was predefined as inferiority for TC6. The prespecified interim monitoring plan was to report for futility if the HR was > 1.18 when 334 IDFS events were observed (50% of 668 events required for definitive analysis). Results A total of 2,125 patients were randomly assigned to receive TC6 regimens and 2,117 patients were randomly assigned to receive TaxAC regimens. The median follow-up time was 3.3 years. There were 334 IDFS events, and the HR for TC6 versus TaxAC was 1.202 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.49), which triggered early reporting for futility. The 4-year IDFS was 88.2% for TC6 and was 90.7% for TaxAC ( P = .04). Tests for treatment interaction by protocol, hormone receptor status, and nodal status were negative. Conclusion The TaxAC regimens improved IDFS in patients with high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer compared with the TC6 regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne L Blum
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Patrick J Flynn
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Greg Yothers
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Lina Asmar
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Charles E Geyer
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Samuel A Jacobs
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Nicholas J Robert
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Joyce A O'Shaughnessy
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Chau T Dang
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Henry Leonidas Gómez
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Louis Fehrenbacher
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Svetislava J Vukelja
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Alan P Lyss
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Devchand Paul
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Jong-Hyeon Jeong
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Linda H Colangelo
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Eleftherios P Mamounas
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Stephen E Jones
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Norman Wolmark
- Joanne L. Blum, Lina Asmar, Nicholas J. Robert, Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Svetislava J. Vukelja, Devchand Paul, and Stephen E. Jones, US Oncology Research; Lina Asmar, McKesson Specialty Health, The Woodlands; Joanne L. Blum and Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas; Svetislava J. Vukelja, Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Patrick J. Flynn, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Samuel A. Jacobs, Judith O. Hopkins, Louis Fehrenbacher, Alan P. Lyss, Adam M. Brufsky, Sandra M. Swain, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, and Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, Jong-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, NRG Oncology; Greg Yothers, John-Hyeon Jeong, and Linda H. Colangelo, The University of Pittsburgh; Samuel A. Jacobs, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Adam M. Brufsky, Magee-Womens Hospital at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Philadelphia, PA; Patrick J. Flynn, Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis, MN; Charles E. Geyer Jr, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA; Judith O. Hopkins, The Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, NC; Chau T. Dang, The Alliance, Boston, MA; Chau T. Dang, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Henry Leonidas Gómez, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA; Alan P. Liss, Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; Devchand Paul, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Sandra M. Swain, MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington Cancer Institute, and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Eleftherios P. Mamounas, UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Phase II study of adjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin with/without doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in triple negative breast cancer: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2017; 21:83-89. [PMID: 28435404 PMCID: PMC5385483 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2017.66661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of the study The aim of this trial was to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity of two adjuvant regimens in triple negative patients with Iranian ethnicity. Material and methods In a phase II trial, patients with previously untreated triple negative breaststroke cancer were randomly assigned by using docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 7 every three weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for sin courses (arm A) or doxorubicin hydrochloride 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every three weeks with G-CSF for four courses followed by docetaxel 70 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 7 every three weeks with G-CSF for four courses (arm B). Results A total of 119 patients were randomly enrolled in our study (60 patients in Arm A and 59 patients in Arm B) between 2011 and 2016. The mean follow-up was 40 months at the time of treatment analysis. The 2-year and 5-year DFS rates for Arm A were 92.7% vs. 85% and for Arm B were 82.6% vs. 64.4%. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates for Arm A were 96.5% vs. 91.7% and for Arm B were 90.5% vs. 81.3%. There was a significant correlation for DFS and OS in the two arms. There was no significant difference between adverse events with the two regimens. Conclusions In our research, less progression was found with Arm A as compared to Arm B. Adding of anthracyclines such as doxorubicin hydrochloride did not increase OS and DFS in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.
Collapse
|
85
|
Vaz-Luis I, O'Neill A, Sepucha K, Miller KD, Baker E, Dang CT, Northfelt DW, Winer EP, Sledge GW, Schneider B, Partridge AH. Survival benefit needed to undergo chemotherapy: Patient and physician preferences. Cancer 2017; 123:2821-2828. [PMID: 28323331 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published studies have suggested that most patients with early stage breast cancer are willing, for modest survival benefits, to receive 6 months of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, an older regimen that is used infrequently today. We examined preferences regarding the survival benefit needed to justify 6 months of a contemporary chemotherapy regimen. METHODS The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol 5103 was a phase 3 trial that randomized breast cancer patients to receive standard adjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with either bevacizumab or placebo. Serial surveys to assess quality of life were administered to patients enrolled between January 1, 2010, and June 8, 2010. Survival benefit needed to justify 6 months of chemotherapy by patients was collected at the 18-month assessment. A parallel survey was sent to physicians who had enrolled patients in the study. RESULTS Of 519 patients who had not withdrawn at a time point earlier than 18 months, 87.8% responded to this survey. A total of 175 physicians participated. We found considerable variation in patient preferences, particularly for modest survival benefits: for 2 months of benefit, 57% would consider 6 months of chemotherapy, whereas 96% of patients would consider 6 months of chemotherapy for 24 months. Race and education were associated with the choices. Physicians who responded were less likely to accept chemotherapy for modest benefit. CONCLUSIONS Among patients who received contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial, we found substantial variation in preferences regarding benefits that justified undergoing chemotherapy. Differences between patients' and physicians' choices were also apparent. Eliciting preferences regarding risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy is critical. Cancer 2017;123:2821-28. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne O'Neill
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Emily Baker
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chau T Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - George W Sledge
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Bryan Schneider
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | |
Collapse
|
86
|
Kurian AW, Friese CR, Bondarenko I, Jagsi R, Li Y, Hamilton AS, Ward KC, Katz SJ. Second Opinions From Medical Oncologists for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Prevalence, Correlates, and Consequences. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:391-397. [PMID: 28033448 PMCID: PMC5520652 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Advances in the evaluation and treatment of breast cancer have made the clinical decision-making context much more complex. A second opinion from a medical oncologist may facilitate decision making for women with breast cancer, yet little is known about second opinion use. OBJECTIVE To investigate the patterns and correlates of second opinion use and the effect on chemotherapy decisions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 1901 women newly diagnosed with stages 0 to II breast cancer between July 2013 and September 2014 (response rate, 71.0%) were accrued through 2 population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (Georgia and Los Angeles County, California) and surveyed about their experiences with medical oncologists, decision making, and chemotherapy use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Factors associated with second opinion use were evaluated using logistic regression. Also assessed was the association between second opinion and chemotherapy use, adjusting for chemotherapy indication and propensity for receiving a second opinion. Multiple imputation and weighting were used to account for missing data. RESULTS A total of 1901 patients with stage I to II breast cancer (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [11.0] years; 1071 [56.3%] non-Hispanic white) saw any medical oncologist. Analysis of multiply imputed, weighted data (mean n = 1866) showed that 168 (9.8%) (SE, 0.74%) received a second opinion and 54 (3.2%) (SE, 0.47%) received chemotherapy from the second oncologist. Satisfaction with chemotherapy decisions was high and did not differ between those who did (mean [SD], 4.3 [0.08] on a 1- to 5-point scale) or did not (4.4 [0.03]) obtain a second opinion (P = .29). Predictors of second opinion use included college education vs less education (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.24-2.75), frequent use of internet-based support groups (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.12-4.11), an intermediate result on the 21-gene recurrence score assay (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.11-3.09), and a variant of uncertain significance on hereditary cancer genetic testing (OR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.09-9.59). After controlling for patient and tumor characteristics, second opinion use was not associated with chemotherapy receipt (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.71-1.52). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Second opinion use was low (<10%) among patients with early-stage breast cancer, and high decision satisfaction regardless of second opinion use suggests little unmet demand. Along with educational level and use of internet support groups, uncertain results on genomic testing predicted second opinion use. Patient demand for second opinions may increase as more complex genomic tests are disseminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison W. Kurian
- Stanford University, Departments of Medicine and Health Research and Policy, Stanford, CA
| | - Christopher R. Friese
- Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Irina Bondarenko
- University of Michigan, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- University of Michigan, Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yun Li
- University of Michigan, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine in the Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kevin C. Ward
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA
| | - Steven J. Katz
- University of Michigan, Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Rugo HS, Klein P, Melin SA, Hurvitz SA, Melisko ME, Moore A, Park G, Mitchel J, Bågeman E, D'Agostino RB, Ver Hoeve ES, Esserman L, Cigler T. Association Between Use of a Scalp Cooling Device and Alopecia After Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. JAMA 2017; 317:606-614. [PMID: 28196257 PMCID: PMC5639721 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.21038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Chemotherapy-induced alopecia is a common and distressing adverse effect. In previous studies of scalp cooling to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia, conclusions have been limited. OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether use of a scalp cooling system is associated with a lower amount of hair loss among women receiving specific chemotherapy regimens for early-stage breast cancer and to assess related changes in quality of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective cohort study conducted at 5 US medical centers of women with stage I or II breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens excluding sequential or combination anthracycline and taxane (106 patients in the scalp cooling group and 16 in the control group; 14 matched by both age and chemotherapy regimen). The study was conducted between August 2013 and October 2014 with ongoing annual follow-up for 5 years. EXPOSURES Use of a scalp cooling system. Scalp cooling was initiated 30 minutes prior to each chemotherapy cycle, with scalp temperature maintained at 3°C (37°F) throughout chemotherapy and for 90 minutes to 120 minutes afterward. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-estimated hair loss using the Dean scale was assessed 4 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy by unblinded patient review of 5 photographs. A Dean scale score of 0 to 2 (≤50% hair loss) was defined as treatment success. A positive association between scalp cooling and reduced risk of hair loss would be demonstrated if 50% or more of patients in the scalp cooling group achieved treatment success, with the lower bound of the 95% CI greater than 40% of the success proportion. Quality of life was assessed at baseline, at the start of the last chemotherapy cycle, and 1 month later. Median follow-up was 29.5 months. RESULTS Among the 122 patients in the study, the mean age was 53 years (range, 28-77 years); 77.0% were white, 9.0% were black, and 10.7% were Asian; and the mean duration of chemotherapy was 2.3 months (median, 2.1 months). No participants in the scalp cooling group received anthracyclines. Hair loss of 50% or less (Dean score of 0-2) was seen in 67 of 101 patients (66.3%; 95% CI, 56.2%-75.4%) evaluable for alopecia in the scalp cooling group vs 0 of 16 patients (0%) in the control group (P < .001). Three of 5 quality-of-life measures were significantly better 1 month after the end of chemotherapy in the scalp cooling group. Of patients who underwent scalp cooling, 27.3% (95% CI, 18.0%-36.6%) reported feeling less physically attractive compared with 56.3% (95% CI, 31.9%-80.6%) of patients in the control group (P = .02). Of the 106 patients in the scalp cooling group, 4 (3.8%) experienced the adverse event of mild headache and 3 (2.8%) discontinued scalp cooling due to feeling cold. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women undergoing non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, the use of scalp cooling vs no scalp cooling was associated with less hair loss at 4 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy. Further research is needed to assess outcomes after patients receive anthracycline regimens, longer-term measures of alopecia, and adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01831024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hope S Rugo
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Paula Klein
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Susan Anitra Melin
- Wake Forest Baptist Health Medical Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Sara A Hurvitz
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Michelle E Melisko
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Anne Moore
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Glen Park
- Target Health Inc, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve
- Columbia University, New York, New York10Now with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Laura Esserman
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Tessa Cigler
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Abstract
Anthracycline chemotherapy maintains a prominent role in treating many forms of cancer. Cardiotoxic side effects limit their dosing and improved cancer outcomes expose the cancer survivor to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The basic mechanisms of cardiotoxicity may involve direct pathways for reactive oxygen species generation and topoisomerase 2 as well as other indirect pathways. Cardioprotective treatments are few and those that have been examined include renin angiotensin system blockade, beta blockers, or the iron chelator dexrazoxane. New treatments exploiting the ErbB or other novel pro-survival pathways, such as conditioning, are on the cardioprotection horizon. Even in the forthcoming era of targeted cancer therapies, the substantial proportion of today's anthracycline-treated cancer patients may become tomorrow's cardiac patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John V McGowan
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - Robin Chung
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - Angshuman Maulik
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - Izabela Piotrowska
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - J Malcolm Walker
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - Derek M Yellon
- The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6HX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Li S, Liu J, Virnig BA, Collins AJ. Association between adjuvant chemotherapy and risk of acute kidney injury in elderly women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 161:515-524. [PMID: 27933451 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4074-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We studied elderly Medicare enrollees newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer to examine the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS Using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including women diagnosed with stages I-III breast cancer at ages 66-89 years between 1992 and 2007. We performed one-to-one matching on time-dependent propensity score on the day of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 6 months after the first cancer-directed surgery based on the estimated probability of chemotherapy initiation at each day for each patient, using a Cox proportional hazards model. We estimated the cumulative incidence of AKI using Kaplan-Meier methods. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between chemotherapy and the risk of AKI, and compared the risk among major chemotherapy types. RESULTS The study included 28,048 women. The 6-month cumulative incidence of AKI was 0.80% for chemotherapy-treated patients, compared with 0.30% for untreated patients (P < 0.001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a nearly threefold increased risk of AKI [hazard ratio (HR) 2.73; 95% CI 1.8-4.1]. Compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the HRs (95% CIs) were 1.66 (0.94-2.91), 0.88 (0.53-1.47), and 1.15 (0.57-2.32) for taxane-based, CMF, and other chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings showed that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of AKI in elderly women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. The risk seemed to vary by regimen type, but the differences were not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuling Li
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 914 South 8th Street, Suite S2.100, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA.
| | - Jiannong Liu
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 914 South 8th Street, Suite S2.100, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA
| | - Beth A Virnig
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Allan J Collins
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, 914 South 8th Street, Suite S2.100, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obtaining cancer screening on patients with limited life expectancy has been proposed as a measure for low quality care for primary care physicians (PCPs). However, administrative data may underestimate life expectancy in patients who undergo screening. OBJECTIVE To determine the association between receipt of screening mammography or PSA and overall survival. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study from 1/1/1999 to 12/31/2012. Receipt of screening was assessed for 2001-2002 and survival from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2012. Life expectancy was estimated as of 1/1/03 using a validated algorithm, and was compared to actual survival for men and women, stratified by receipt of cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS A 5 % sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 69-90 years as of 1/1/2003 (n = 906,723). INTERVENTIONS Receipt of screening mammography in 2001-2002 for women, or a screening PSA test in 2002 for men. MAIN MEASURES Survival from 1/1/2003 through 12/31/2012. KEY RESULTS Subjects were stratified by life expectancy based on age and comorbidity. Within each stratum, the subjects with prior cancer screening had actual median survivals higher than those who were not screened, with differences ranging from 1.7 to 2.1 years for women and 0.9 to 1.1 years for men. In a Cox model, non-receipt of screening in women had an impact on survival (HR = 1.52; 95 % CI = 1.51, 1.54) similar in magnitude to a diagnosis of complicated diabetes or heart failure, and was comparable to uncomplicated diabetes or liver disease in men (HR = 1.23; 1.22, 1.25). CONCLUSIONS Receipt of cancer screening is a powerful marker of health status that is not captured by comorbidity measures in administrative data. Because life expectancy algorithms using administrative data underestimate the life expectancy of patients who undergo screening, they can overestimate the problem of cancer screening in patients with limited life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S Goodwin
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
- Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-0177, USA.
- Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
| | - Kristin Sheffield
- Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Global Patient Outcomes and Real World Evidence, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA
| | - Shuang Li
- Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-0177, USA
| | - Alai Tan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555-0177, USA
- Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Ohio State University School of Nursing, 1582 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Henry NL, Braun TM, Ali HY, Munir K, Silver SM, Gorski DH, Breslin TM, Griggs JJ. Associations between use of the 21‐gene recurrence score assay and chemotherapy regimen selection in a statewide registry. Cancer 2016; 123:948-956. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Revised: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N. Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn Arbor Michigan
| | - Thomas M. Braun
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of Michigan School of Public HealthAnn Arbor Michigan
| | | | - Khan Munir
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn Arbor Michigan
| | - Samuel M. Silver
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn Arbor Michigan
| | - David H. Gorski
- Department of Surgery, Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroit Michigan
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroit Michigan
| | | | - Jennifer J. Griggs
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn Arbor Michigan
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public HealthAnn ArborMichigan
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Jin X, Jiang YZ, Chen S, Yu KD, Ma D, Sun W, Shao ZM, Di GH. A nomogram for predicting pathological complete response in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:606. [PMID: 27495967 PMCID: PMC4974800 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2652-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been proven to predict long-term clinical benefits for patients. Our research is to construct a nomogram to predict pathological complete response of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer patients. Methods We enrolled 815 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 2003 to 2015 and divided them into a training set and a validation set. Univariate logistic regression was performed to screen for predictors and construct the nomogram; multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors. Results After performing the univariate logistic regression analysis in the training set, tumor size, hormone receptor status, regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were the final predictors for the construction of the nomogram. The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that T4 status, hormone receptor status and receiving regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin were independent predictors of pathological complete response. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the training set and the validation set was 0.779 and 0.701, respectively. Conclusions We constructed and validated a nomogram to predict pathological complete response in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer patients. We also identified tumor size, hormone receptor status and paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen as independent predictors of pathological complete response. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2652-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yi-Zhou Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Sheng Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ke-Da Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhi-Min Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Gen-Hong Di
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
R Ferreira A, Palha A, Correia L, Filipe P, Rodrigues V, Costa L, Miranda A, André R, Fernandes J, Gouveia J, Passos-Coelho JL, Moreira A, Brito M, Ribeiro J, Metzger-Filho O, U Lin N, Vaz-Luís I. Variation in type of adjuvant chemotherapy received among patients with stage I breast cancer: A multi-institutional Portuguese cohort study. Breast 2016; 29:68-73. [PMID: 27468923 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Revised: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A contemporary US study showed an increase in the use of chemotherapy in the last decade for some patients with stage-I breast cancer; with a rise in more intensive regimens, and declining use of anthracyclines. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty on the absolute benefit of chemotherapy for these patients and the optimal regimen. In this study we compare those findings with the patterns of care among a Portuguese cohort of stage-I breast cancers. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of patients with stage-I breast cancer diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 at four Portuguese institutions. The use and type of chemotherapy was evaluated. RESULTS Among patients with stage I-III breast cancer 39.4% (n = 682) had stage I disease. Of the 595 eligible patients, 22.4% were treated with chemotherapy, 33.9% aged <55 years vs. 12.7% aged >65 years (p < 0.001). Thirteen percent of patients with hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- tumors, 52.7% of patients with HER2+ and 66.0% of patients with HR-/HER2- received chemotherapy (p < 0.001). In addition, we found inter-institutional variability, with the use of chemotherapy ranging from 0.0% to 43.4% (p < 0.001). Eighty-five percent of patients treated with chemotherapy received less-intensive regimens with anthracycline-based regimens, such as doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, being the most frequently used, while docetaxel and cyclophosphamide was only used in 1.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Overall, almost one-quarter of patients received chemotherapy with institutional variability. When treated, mostly less-intensive associations including anthracyclines were used, which contrasts with contemporary US practice. This study highlights the need for health-services research to understand local practices and tailor quality improvement interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlindo R Ferreira
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Ana Palha
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lurdes Correia
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Filipe
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vasco Rodrigues
- Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luís Costa
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ana Miranda
- Registo Oncológico Regional do Sul, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rosário André
- Registo Oncológico Regional do Sul, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - António Moreira
- Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Margarida Brito
- Instituto Português de Oncologia F. G. de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
94
|
Yang J, Neugut AI, Wright JD, Accordino M, Hershman DL. Nonadherence to Oral Medications for Chronic Conditions in Breast Cancer Survivors. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:e800-9. [PMID: 27407167 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.011742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nonadherence to oral endocrine therapy is common among women with breast cancer (BC). Less is known about nonadherence to medications for other chronic conditions among survivors of BC. METHODS We used the MarketScan Database to identify women older than 18 years who had nonmetastatic BC diagnosed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013. Prescriptions were identified for the following six non-cancer-related conditions: hypertension, thyroid disease, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis. The study period was defined as 1 year before BC diagnosis (index date) through 1.5 years after the index date, with a 6-month washout period after the index data to control for adherence during the preoperative period and during chemotherapy if necessary. Adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio ≥ 80%. Change in adherence was defined as a 20% decrease in the medication possession ratio from the time before diagnosis compared with after treatment. Factors associated with change in adherence were evaluated in multivariable logistic models. RESULTS Among 36,149 patients diagnosed with BC, the average adherence to these medications before BC was 91.4%. However, after BC treatment, adherence decreased to 77.9% (P < .001). Looking at drugs for each condition, nonadherence ranged from 15.6% to 38% (P < .001). Factors associated with an increase in nonadherence included older age, insurance type, number of medications, and comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION Decreased adherence to medications for chronic diseases was found in the first year after breast cancer treatment. Breast cancer survivors may need additional interventions to improve their adherence to their medications for chronic conditions.
Collapse
|
95
|
Miller K, Cortes J, Hurvitz SA, Krop IE, Tripathy D, Verma S, Riahi K, Reynolds JG, Wickham TJ, Molnar I, Yardley DA. HERMIONE: a randomized Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physician's choice plus trastuzumab in patients with previously treated, anthracycline-naïve, HER2-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:352. [PMID: 27259714 PMCID: PMC4893300 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2385-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is a particularly aggressive form of the disease, and ultimately progresses in patients with metastases on standard therapies. Anthracyclines, such as doxorubicin, are an effective treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly when administered in combination with trastuzumab – however, doxorubicin-related cardiotoxicity has limited its use. Many patients are therefore never treated with anthracyclines, even upon disease progression, despite the potential for benefit. MM-302 is a novel, HER2-targeted antibody–liposomal doxorubicin conjugate that specifically targets HER2overexpressing cells. Preclinical and Phase 1 data suggest that MM-302, as a monotherapy or in combination with trastuzumab, could be effective for managing previously treated, anthracycline-naïve, HER2-positive breast cancer, without the cardiotoxicity observed with free doxorubicin formulations. Methods/Design HERMIONE is an open-label, multicenter, randomized (1:1) Phase 2 trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab versus chemotherapy of physician’s choice (gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine) plus trastuzumab planned to enroll 250 anthracycline-naïve patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Key inclusion criteria are: previous treatment with trastuzumab (with or without pertuzumab) in any setting; refractory or intolerant to pertuzumab (refractory to pertuzumab defined as progression in the locally advanced or metastatic setting, or disease recurrence during or within 12 months of completing pertuzumab-containing neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy); and disease progression on, or intolerant to, ado-trastuzumab emtansine for locally advanced or metastatic disease. The trial is currently being conducted at sites in the USA, Canada, and Western Europe. Treatment will be administered in 21-day cycles, and will be continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is independently assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor response will be assessed every 6 weeks, and defined according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), OS rates at 6 months and 1 year, objective response rates, safety and tolerability, quality of life, and the pharmacokinetic profile of MM-302 plus trastuzumab. Discussion The HERMIONE study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of MM-302 plus trastuzumab in patients with refractory HER2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer for whom there are no standard of care therapies with a proven survival advantage. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02213744. Registration date: 06AUG2014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2385-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Javier Cortes
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain and Ramony Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara A Hurvitz
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sunil Verma
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kaveh Riahi
- Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1 Kendall Square, Suite B7201, Cambridge, MA, 02139-1670, USA
| | - Joseph G Reynolds
- Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1 Kendall Square, Suite B7201, Cambridge, MA, 02139-1670, USA.
| | - Thomas J Wickham
- Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1 Kendall Square, Suite B7201, Cambridge, MA, 02139-1670, USA
| | - Istvan Molnar
- Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1 Kendall Square, Suite B7201, Cambridge, MA, 02139-1670, USA
| | - Denise A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
|
97
|
Lasham A, Mehta SY, Fitzgerald SJ, Woolley AG, Hearn JI, Hurley DG, Ruza I, Algie M, Shelling AN, Braithwaite AW, Print CG. A novel EGR-1 dependent mechanism for YB-1 modulation of paclitaxel response in a triple negative breast cancer cell line. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:1157-70. [PMID: 27072400 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 03/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy with taxanes such as paclitaxel (PTX) is a key component of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) treatment. PTX is used in combination with other drugs in both the adjuvant setting and in advanced breast cancer. Because a proportion of patients respond poorly to PTX or relapse after its use, a greater understanding of the mechanisms conferring resistance to PTX is required. One protein shown to be involved in drug resistance is Y-box binding protein 1 (YB-1). High levels of YB-1 have previously been associated with resistance to PTX in TNBCs. In this study, we aimed to determine mechanisms by which YB-1 confers PTX resistance. We generated isogenic TNBC cell lines that differed by YB-1 levels and treated these with PTX. Using microarray analysis, we identified EGR1 as a potential target of YB-1. We found that low EGR1 mRNA levels are associated with poor breast cancer patient prognosis, and that EGR1 and YBX1 mRNA expression was inversely correlated in a TNBC line and in a proportion of TNBC tumours. Reducing the levels of EGR1 caused TNBC cells to become more resistant to PTX. Given that PTX targets cycling cells, we propose a model whereby high YB-1 levels in some TNBC cells can lead to reduced levels of EGR1, which in turn promotes slow cell cycling and resistance to PTX. Therefore YB-1 and EGR1 levels are biologically linked and may provide a biomarker for TNBC response to PTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Lasham
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sunali Y Mehta
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sandra J Fitzgerald
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Adele G Woolley
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - James I Hearn
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Daniel G Hurley
- Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Bioinformatics Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Systems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Igor Ruza
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Michael Algie
- Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Andrew N Shelling
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Antony W Braithwaite
- Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Pathology, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Cristin G Print
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Bioinformatics Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Marín-Pozo JF, Duarte-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Rovira P. Safety, Effectiveness, and Costs of Bevacizumab-Based Therapy in Southern Spain: A Real World Experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e3623. [PMID: 27175672 PMCID: PMC4902514 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000003623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab in a broader patient population with solid tumors in the context of general clinical practice. Moreover, we quantified the economic impact and characterized the off-label use (OLU) of this agent in real-life prescribing practices.This is an open, retrospective, observational, real world study carried out at a regional Spanish hospital attending a population of 665,000 inhabitants. All of the patients receiving bevacizumab-containing therapy between January 2006 and February 2012 at the study hospital were included: no exclusion criteria were specified. All study variables were collected from available hospital records.The analysis comprised 240 episodes from 226 patients (male 41%; median age 57 years, 25% ≥65 years). Eighty cases (33%) of bevacizumab treatment were administered as first-line therapy. The median duration of bevacizumab treatment was 5.8 months (95% CI 5.1-6.6), without difference by age, line of treatment, or type of tumor. Typically bevacizumab-related toxicities included bleeding (25%), hypertension (5%), wound-healing complications (4%), gastrointestinal perforation (2%), and arterial thromboembolism (1%). Median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.3-8.7) and median OS reached 13.1 months (95% CI 11.4-14.9). Bevacizumab increased the chemotherapy cost to 207% (from &OV0556;3,115,615 to &OV0556;9,552,405). Bevacizumab was prescribed off-label in 43% of episodes, amounting to &OV0556;3,586,420 (56% of bevacizumab total cost).The efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in routine clinical practice is consistent with results observed in prospective randomized clinical trials. OLU of this drug should be closely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan F Marín-Pozo
- From the Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén (JFM-P, PS-R), Spain; and University of Granada (JMD-P), Granada, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
99
|
Grumpelt AM, Ignatov A, Tchaikovski SN, Burger E, Costa SD, Eggemann H. Tumor characteristics and therapy of elderly patients with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016; 142:1109-16. [PMID: 26809246 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2111-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Accepted: 12/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Elderly breast cancer patients aged ≥75 years are underrepresented in most studies. Therefore, data on cancer characteristics, adjuvant treatment and survival in elderly patients are missing. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, we compared tumor characteristics and adjuvant therapy in 973 women with invasive, non-metastasized breast cancer aged ≥75 years with 3377 younger postmenopausal patients (50-74 years old). Time dynamics of tumor characteristics were investigated, comparing two observation periods between the years 2000-2004 versus 2005-2008. RESULTS Compared to younger women, older patients were more often treated with mastectomy and less likely to receive adjuvant treatment. Although the overall survival rate increased over the observation period in both age groups, the older study group was characterized by shorter disease-free survival. Additionally, we observed an increase in about 1.65 years in the age at diagnosis as well as an increasing rate of breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for the whole study population between 2000 and 2008. Furthermore, we found a reduction in the proportion of estrogen receptor-positive tumors in the younger women and a decrease in G3-tumors in both age groups over the study time. CONCLUSION The older group's reduced disease-free survival could be explained by the tumor characteristics and differences in the adjuvant treatment. Remarkably, elderly women are more likely to be overtreated surgically while being undertreated in terms of adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Immunoenzyme Techniques
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- Survival Rate
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-M Grumpelt
- University Womens Hospital, Otto-von-Guericke University, Gerhard-Hauptmann-Str. 35, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - A Ignatov
- University Womens Hospital, Otto-von-Guericke University, Gerhard-Hauptmann-Str. 35, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S N Tchaikovski
- University Womens Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Burger
- Cancer Registry Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S-D Costa
- University Womens Hospital, Otto-von-Guericke University, Gerhard-Hauptmann-Str. 35, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - H Eggemann
- University Womens Hospital, Otto-von-Guericke University, Gerhard-Hauptmann-Str. 35, 39108, Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat Med 2016; 22:547-56. [PMID: 27089514 DOI: 10.1038/nm.4087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 536] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Doxorubicin is an anthracycline chemotherapy agent effective in treating a wide range of malignancies, but it causes a dose-related cardiotoxicity that can lead to heart failure in a subset of patients. At present, it is not possible to predict which patients will be affected by doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC). Here we demonstrate that patient-specific human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) can recapitulate the predilection to DIC of individual patients at the cellular level. hiPSC-CMs derived from individuals with breast cancer who experienced DIC were consistently more sensitive to doxorubicin toxicity than hiPSC-CMs from patients who did not experience DIC, with decreased cell viability, impaired mitochondrial and metabolic function, impaired calcium handling, decreased antioxidant pathway activity, and increased reactive oxygen species production. Taken together, our data indicate that hiPSC-CMs are a suitable platform to identify and characterize the genetic basis and molecular mechanisms of DIC.
Collapse
|