Neurologists' knowledge of and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery: a national survey

Long-term outcomes after epilepsy surgery, a retrospective cohort study linking patient-reported outcomes and routine healthcare data

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess the long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery between 1995 and 2015 in South Wales, UK, linking case note review, postal questionnaire, and routinely collected healthcare data.

METHOD

We identified patients from a departmental database and collected outcome data from patient case notes, a postal questionnaire, and the QOLIE-31-P and linked with Welsh routinely collected data in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included. Median age at surgery was 34 years (11-70), median: 24 years (2-56) after onset of habitual seizures. Median follow-up was 7 years (2-19). Twenty-eight (49%) patients were free from disabling seizures (Engel Class 1), 9 (16%) experienced rare disabling seizures (Class 2), 13 (23%) had worthwhile improvements (Class 3), and 7 (12%) had no improvement (Class 4). There was a 30% mean reduction in total antiepileptic drug (AED) load at five years postsurgery. Thirty-eight (66.7%) patients experienced tonic-clonic seizures presurgery verses 8 (14%) at last review. Seizure-free patients self-reported a greater overall quality of life (QOL; QOLIE-31-P) when compared with those not achieving seizure freedom. Seizure-free individuals scored a mean of 67.6/100 (100 is best), whereas those with continuing seizures scored 46.0/100 (p < 0.006). There was a significant decrease in the median rate of hospital admissions for any cause after epilepsy surgery (9.8 days per 1000 patient days before surgery compared with 3.9 after p < 0.005).

SIGNIFICANCE

Epilepsy surgery was associated with significant improvements in seizures, a reduced AED load, and an improved QOL that closely correlated with seizure outcomes and reduced hospital admission rates following surgery. Despite this, there was a long delay from onset of habitual seizures to surgery. The importance of long-term follow-up is emphasized in terms of evolving medical needs and health and social care outcomes.

Identification and referral of patients with refractory epilepsy from the primary to the tertiary care interface in New South Wales, Australia

OBJECTIVES

This mixed-method feasibility study conducted in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, aimed to explore clinical practices around the identification of patients with refractory epilepsy and referral from primary care to Tertiary Epilepsy Centers. The perceptions of general practitioners, neurologists, and adults living with refractory epilepsy were considered.

METHODS

Fifty-two data collection events were achieved through 22 semi-structured interviews with six neurologists and 12 adults who currently have, or have had refractory epilepsy, and four family members, 10 clinical observations of patient consultations and 20 surveys with general practitioners. A thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data alongside assessment of observational fieldnotes and survey data.

FINDINGS

Two main themes emerged: 1) Patient healthcare pathways and care experiences highlighted the complex and deeply contextualized experiences of both patients and healthcare professionals, from first identification of people's seizures, in primary and community care settings, to referral to Tertiary Epilepsy Centers, shedding light on a fragmented, nonstandardized referral process, influenced by both individual and shared-care practices. 2) Factors impacting referrals and patient pathways indicated that onward referral to a Tertiary Epilepsy Center is affected by the knowledge, or the lack thereof, of healthcare professionals regarding treatment options. Barriers include limited person-centered care, shared decision-making, and refractory epilepsy education for healthcare professionals, which can delay patients' disease identification and can hinder speedy referral pathways and processes, in Australia for up to 17 years. In addition, person-centered communication around care pathways is affected by relationships between clinicians, patients, and family members.

CONCLUSION

This study has identified a noticeable lack of standardized care across epilepsy-related healthcare sectors, which recognizes a need for developing and implementing clearer epilepsy-related guidelines and Continuing Professional Development in the primary and community care settings. This, however, requires greater collaboration and commitment in the primary, community, and tertiary care sectors to address the ongoing misconceptions around professional roles and responsibilities to optimize shared-care practices. Ultimately, prioritizing person-centered care on both patients' and professionals' agendas, in order to improve satisfaction with care experiences of people living with complex epilepsy.

Cost-effectiveness of surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy in the US

OBJECTIVE

Surgery is an effective but costly treatment for many patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (DR-TLE). We aim to evaluate whether, in the United States, surgery is cost-effective compared to medical management for patients deemed surgical candidates and whether surgical evaluation is cost-effective for patients with DR-TLE in general.

METHODS

We use a semi-Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of surgery and surgical evaluation over a lifetime horizon. We use second-order Monte Carlo simulations to conduct probabilistic sensitivity analyses to estimate variation in model output. We adopt both health care and societal perspectives, including direct health care costs (e.g., surgery, antiepileptic drugs) and indirect costs (e.g., lost earnings by patients and care providers.) We compare the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to societal willingness to pay (∼$100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) to determine whether surgery is cost-effective.

RESULTS

Epilepsy surgery is cost-effective compared to medical management in surgically eligible patients by virtue of being cost-saving ($328,000 vs $423,000) and more effective (16.6 vs 13.6 QALY) than medical management in the long run. Surgical evaluation is cost-effective in patients with DR-TLE even if the probability of being deemed a surgical candidate is only 5%. From a societal perspective, surgery becomes cost-effective within 3 years, and 89% of simulations favor surgery over the lifetime horizon.

CONCLUSION

For surgically eligible patients with DR-TLE, surgery is cost-effective. For patients with DR-TLE in general, referral for surgical evaluation (and possible subsequent surgery) is cost-effective. Patients with DR-TLE should be referred for surgical evaluation without hesitation on cost-effectiveness grounds.

Deciphering the surgical treatment gap for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE): A literature review

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) rarely achieve seizure freedom with medical therapy alone. Despite being safe and effective for select patients with DRE, epilepsy surgery remains heavily underutilized. Multiple studies have indicated that the overall rates of surgery in patients with DRE have stagnated in recent years and may be decreasing, even when hospitalizations for epilepsy-related problems are on the rise. Ultimately, many patients with DRE who might otherwise benefit from surgery continue to have intractable seizures, lacking access to the full spectrum of available treatment options. In this article, we review the various factors accounting for the persistent underutilization of epilepsy surgery and uncover several key themes, including the persistent knowledge gap among physicians in identifying potential surgical candidates, lack of coordinated patient care, patient misconceptions of surgery, and socioeconomic disparities impeding access to care. Moreover, factors such as the cost and complexity of the preoperative evaluation, a lack of federal resource allocation for the research of surgical therapies for epilepsy, and difficulties recruiting patients to clinical trials all contribute to this multifaceted dilemma.

Knowledge of and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery among neurologists in Saudi Arabia

Objectives:

To investigate the levels of knowledge and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery among neurologists in Saudi Arabia and evaluate the factors that affect the physicians’ knowledge and attitudes.

Methods:

A quantitative observational cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh. The data were collected using a newly developed, self-administered online questionnaire. The questionnaire contained 3 sections: demographic information, knowledge, and attitudes which then sent to neurologist in Saudi Arabia from December 2016 to March 2017.

Results:

A total of 106 neurologists met our inclusion criteria. Eighty percent of the participants had at least one epilepsy center in their city, and 78% indicated that they had access to adequate expertise and resources to enable the appropriate selection of epilepsy surgical candidates. Only 57.5% of the neurologists had a sufficient level of knowledge regarding epilepsy surgery. Neurologists with higher level of knowledge referred more patients to EMU and discussed epilepsy surgery more often with their patients. Overall, more than half of the neurologists (52.8%) had a positive attitude toward epilepsy surgery. There was a significantly positive correlation between the scores of knowledge and attitude (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Neurologists in Saudi Arabia appear to have moderate knowledge of and positive attitudes toward epilepsy surgery. The place of the last neurology certificate, type of practicing hospital, and access to expertise and resources, affected their knowledge. Adequate knowledge was positively correlated with attitude.

Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referral and operationalize the Canadian Appropriateness of Epilepsy Surgery (CASES) tool for use in a lower income country without neurologists.

METHODS

People with epilepsy were recruited from the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital from 2014-2016. Each participant was clinically evaluated, underwent at least one standard EEG, and was invited to undergo a free 1.5 T brain MRI. Clinical variables required for CASES were operationalized for use in lower-income populations and entered into the free, anonymous website tool.

FINDINGS

There were 209 eligible participants (mean age 28.4 years, 56 % female, 179 with brain MRI data). Of the 179 participants with brain MRI, 43 (24.0 %) were appropriate for an epilepsy surgery referral, 21 (11.7 %) were uncertain, and 115 (64.3 %) were inappropriate for referral. Among the 43 appropriate referral cases, 36 (83.7 %) were "very high" and 7 (16.3 %) were "high" priorities for referral. For every unit increase in surgical appropriateness, quality of life (QoL) dropped by 2.3 points (p-value <0.001). Among the 68 patients who took >1 antiepileptic drug prior to enrollment, 42 (61.8 %) were appropriate referrals, 14 (20.6 %) were uncertain, and 12 (17.6 %) were inappropriate.

CONCLUSION

Approximately a quarter of Bhutanese epilepsy patients who completed evaluation in this national referral-based hospital should have been evaluated for epilepsy surgery, sometimes urgently. Surgical services for epilepsy are an emerging priority for improving global epilepsy care and should be scaled up through international partnerships and clinician support algorithms like CASES to avoid missed opportunities.

Prospective validation of a machine learning model that uses provider notes to identify candidates for resective epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Delay to resective epilepsy surgery results in avoidable disease burden and increased risk of mortality. The objective was to prospectively validate a natural language processing (NLP) application that uses provider notes to assign epilepsy surgery candidacy scores.

METHODS

The application was trained on notes from (1) patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy and a history of resective epilepsy surgery and (2) patients who were seizure-free without surgery. The testing set included all patients with unknown surgical candidacy status and an upcoming neurology visit. Training and testing sets were updated weekly for 1 year. One- to three-word phrases contained in patients' notes were used as features. Patients prospectively identified by the application as candidates for surgery were manually reviewed by two epileptologists. Performance metrics were defined by comparing NLP-derived surgical candidacy scores with surgical candidacy status from expert chart review.

RESULTS

The training set was updated weekly and included notes from a mean of 519 ± 67 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 10-fold cross-validation was 0.90 ± 0.04 (range = 0.83-0.96) and improved by 0.002 per week (P < .001) as new patients were added to the training set. Of the 6395 patients who visited the neurology clinic, 4211 (67%) were evaluated by the model. The prospective AUC on this test set was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62-0.96). Using the optimal surgical candidacy score threshold, sensitivity was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.29-0.99), specificity was 0.77 (95% CI = 0.64-0.88), positive predictive value was 0.25 (95% CI = 0.07-0.52), and negative predictive value was 0.98 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). The number needed to screen was 5.6.

SIGNIFICANCE

An electronic health record-integrated NLP application can accurately assign surgical candidacy scores to patients in a clinical setting.

Strategic hospital partnerships: improved access to care and increased epilepsy surgical volume

OBJECTIVE Surgical treatment of patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy is underutilized. Patients may lack access to surgically proficient centers. The University of California, Irvine (UCI) entered strategic partnerships with 2 epilepsy centers with limited surgical capabilities. A formal memorandum of understanding (MOU) was created to provide epilepsy surgery to patients from these centers. METHODS The authors analyzed UCI surgical and financial data associated with patients undergoing epilepsy surgery between September 2012 and June 2016, before and after institution of the MOU. Variables collected included the length of stay, patient age, seizure semiology, use of invasive monitoring, and site of surgery as well as the monthly number of single-surgery cases, complex cases (i.e., staged surgeries), and overall number of surgery cases. RESULTS Over the 46 months of the study, a total of 104 patients underwent a total of 200 operations; 71 operations were performed in 39 patients during the pre-MOU period (28 months) and 129 operations were performed in 200 patients during the post-MOU period (18 months). There was a significant difference in the use of invasive monitoring, the site of surgery, the final therapy, and the type of insurance. The number of single-surgery cases, complex-surgery cases, and the overall number of cases increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS Partnerships with outside epilepsy centers are a means to increase access to surgical care. These partnerships are likely reproducible, can be mutually beneficial to all centers involved, and ultimately improve patient access to care.

Recommendations of the Russian League Against Epilepsy (RLAE) on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of epilepsy

Introduction. The MRI method has revolutionized the diagnosis of epilepsy. However, the widespread adoption of MRI in clinical practice is slowed by an insufficient number of high-field MRI scanners, a shortage of trained specialists, and the lack of standard examination protocols. The aim of this article is to present the Recommendations of the Russian League Against Epilepsy (RLAE) on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of epilepsy.

Materials and methods. As a structural element of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), the RLAE considers it important to adapt the Protocol developed by ILAE for specialists in Russia and EAEU countries. The working group analyzed and generalized the clinical practice existing in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of Uzbekistan. These recommendations are intended for doctors in specialized centers of epilepsy surgery, and for doctors in general medical centers. The recommendations are applicable primarily to adult patients, but the general principles are relevant to children as well.

Results. In all patients with convulsive seizures shortly after the first seizure, or patients diagnosed with epilepsy who have an unexplained increase in the frequency of seizures, rapid decrease in cognitive functions or the appearance / worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms, the RLAE recommends using a unified MR protocol for the neuroimaging of structural sequences in epilepsy with three-dimensional pulse sequences T1 and T2 FLAIR with isotropic voxel 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 and two-dimensional T2- weighted pulse sequences with a pixel size of 1 × 1 mm2 or less. The MRI examination should be combined with EEG or EEG-video monitoring. Using this protocol allows one to set a unified standard for examining patients with epilepsy in order to detect (with high sensitivity) brain lesions playing a key role in the occurrence of seizures. Here, all 13 recommendations are presented.

Conclusion. Implementation of these recommendations in clinical practice will improve the access to high-tech medical care and optimize health care costs. 

Seizure outcome and its predictors after frontal lobe epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVES

Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) surgery is the second most common focal resective surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. Not many studies are available regarding the long-term surgical outcome of FLE. We studied the longitudinal outcome and predictors of seizure outcome following FLE surgery in a sizeable cohort of patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A total of 73 consecutive patients who underwent FLE surgery between January 1997 and May 2015 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year (range 1-16 years) were studied. Primary outcome was seizure freedom at last follow-up (Engel Class IA). "Seizure freedom" separately was defined as absence of seizures till last follow-up. Outcome predictors were subjected to multivariate analysis. Using Kaplan-Meier curve, we assessed the post-operative seizure freedom over time.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (34%) were seizure-free till last follow-up. The seizure freedom was 45%, 34%, 26%, 20% and 14% at the end of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th post-operative year, respectively. Engel class I outcomes were 48%, 41%, 56%, 57% and 53% at end of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th post-operative year, respectively. Predictors of seizure recurrence on multivariate analysis were older age at surgery (P = 0.032), longer duration of epilepsy (P = 0.031), presence of interictal epileptiform discharges in post-operative EEG on 7th day (P = 0.005), 3 months (P = 0.005) and 1 year (P = 0.0179). In subgroup analysis, duration of epilepsy of less than 2 years before surgery was a significant predictor for achieving seizure freedom (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

These results emphasize early surgery for better outcome in frontal lobe epilepsy. Post-operative EEG remained a good predictor for long-term outcome.

Referral trends for temporal lobe epilepsy surgery between 2000 and 2014 in India

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective study examining the trends in referral to a tertiary epilepsy surgery center in India over 2 decades.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent long-term video electro encephalography monitoring for presurgical evaluation were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged >16 years and diagnosed to have drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) were included. They were divided into 3 groups comprising 5-year periods each during which they underwent presurgical evaluation, group 1: year 2000-2004; group 2: year 2005-2009; and group 3: year 2010-2014. Referral data with particular reference to duration of epilepsy before referral, age at onset of seizures, and number of antiepileptic drugs tried before referral were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1362 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There were 385 referrals in group 1, 488 in group 2, and 489 in group 3. The mean duration of epilepsy before referral was 18.10 ± 9.44 years; there was no change in the duration of epilepsy before referral (p = 0.638). A significant increase in the age at onset of seizures and age at presurgical evaluation was noted over time.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence for delayed referral of patients with refractory TLE to a surgical epilepsy center in this study. Renewed efforts to confront challenges beholding epilepsy surgery and steps to ensure timely referral are desirable.

Recommendations for the use of structural magnetic resonance imaging in the care of patients with epilepsy: A consensus report from the International League Against Epilepsy Neuroimaging Task Force

Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of fundamental importance to the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy, particularly when surgery is being considered. Despite previous recommendations and guidelines, practices for the use of MRI are variable worldwide and may not harness the full potential of recent technological advances for the benefit of people with epilepsy. The International League Against Epilepsy Diagnostic Methods Commission has thus charged the 2013-2017 Neuroimaging Task Force to develop a set of recommendations addressing the following questions: (1) Who should have an MRI? (2) What are the minimum requirements for an MRI epilepsy protocol? (3) How should magnetic resonance (MR) images be evaluated? (4) How to optimize lesion detection? These recommendations target clinicians in established epilepsy centers and neurologists in general/district hospitals. They endorse routine structural imaging in new onset generalized and focal epilepsy alike and describe the range of situations when detailed assessment is indicated. The Neuroimaging Task Force identified a set of sequences, with three-dimensional acquisitions at its core, the harmonized neuroimaging of epilepsy structural sequences-HARNESS-MRI protocol. As these sequences are available on most MR scanners, the HARNESS-MRI protocol is generalizable, regardless of the clinical setting and country. The Neuroimaging Task Force also endorses the use of computer-aided image postprocessing methods to provide an objective account of an individual's brain anatomy and pathology. By discussing the breadth and depth of scope of MRI, this report emphasizes the unique role of this noninvasive investigation in the care of people with epilepsy.

Survey of epilepsy and seizure awareness in Manitoba: An evaluation

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy and seizure awareness is gradually improving across Canada. With the strategic proposal for a Comprehensive Epilepsy Program in Manitoba (including formation of a new Pediatric Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU)), a provincial strategy has been recommended outlining a path towards improved access to epilepsy care. We sought to qualify the current state of clinician knowledge and comfort towards diagnosis and management of this condition.

METHODS

A qualitative online survey (Survey of Epilepsy and Seizure Awareness in Manitoba: An Evaluation (SESAME)), comprised of 36 short-answer questions, was delivered to primary care and specialist physicians in Manitoba.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight subjects responded across varying medical disciplines. One hundred and one (93.5%) had previously managed patients with epilepsy, and 87 (80.6%) had previously ordered an electroencephalogram (EEG). A total of 63 (59.4%) had referred to a neurologist, with a lower proportion (30, 28.3%) referring specifically to an epileptologist. Only 36 respondents (33.3%) had heard of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guidelines. A total of 61 (56.5%) were unaware of invasive EEG techniques. Most (85, 78.7%) understood a role for surgery in treating epilepsy, with 12 (11.1%) unaware of surgical therapies beyond vagal nerve stimulation (VNS). Finally, less than half (44.2%) had heard about the Comprehensive Epilepsy Program in Manitoba, with nearly two-thirds (62.8%) indicating that they would like to have more information on epilepsy management.

CONCLUSIONS

The SESAME successfully identified strong awareness towards epilepsy, with identifiable lapses in knowledge that will benefit from a formal provincial-wide educational curriculum.

"Time is Brain"-How early should surgery be done in drug-resistant TLE?

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effect of duration of epilepsy and delay in surgery on seizure outcome in patients operated for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

MATERIALS & METHODS

A total of 664 consecutive patients who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for TLE from 1995 to 2008 formed the study cohort. We divided them into two, one as seizure-free with or without antiepileptic drugs after ATL as "good outcome" (Engel class I a) and seizures of any type, any time after surgery as "poor outcome." The probability of seizure freedom/seizure recurrence based on the duration of epilepsy was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate Cox regression survival analysis, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 136 children and 528 adults underwent ATL during this period. Mean duration of epilepsy pre-ATL was 17.1 + 9.4 years. At mean follow-up of 8.5 years, 331 patients (49.8%) had good outcome and 333 (50.2%) had poor outcome. The hazard of seizure recurrence linearly increased with duration of epilepsy pre-ATL, from 1.5 (duration of epilepsy, 5-10 years) to 1.9 (duration of epilepsy, 10-15 years) to 2 (duration of epilepsy over 15 years). In addition, encephalitis as antecedent, bilateral mesial temporal sclerosis in MRI, normal histopathology, and spikes in postoperative EEG at 3 months and 1 year predicted poor seizure outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

"Epilepsy duration" independently predicted both short- and long-term seizure outcome after surgery in TLE. "Lost years" translate into poor seizure outcome after ATL. Therefore, all cases of drug-resistant TLE should be referred to a surgical center at the earliest.

Treatment of medically refractory seizures with responsive neurostimulation: 2 pediatric cases

The responsive neurostimulation (RNS) system, an adjunctive treatment for pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures with 1 or 2 foci, has been available to patients aged 18 years or older since the device's FDA approval in 2013. Herein, the authors describe their off-label application of this technology in 2 pediatric patients and the consequent therapeutic benefit without surgical complications or treatment side effects. A 14-year-old nonambulatory, nonverbal male with severe developmental delay was considered for RNS therapy for medically and surgically refractory epilepsy with bilateral seizure onsets in the setting of a normal radiological examination and a known neuropathological diagnosis of type I cortical dysplasia. The RNS system was implanted with strip electrodes placed on the left lateral frontal and right lateral temporal neocortex. At 19 months' follow-up, cortical stimulation resulted in sustained reduction in both seizure frequency-3 seizures per day down from 15 to 30 per day-and seizure severity. The patient subsequently underwent a trial of corticothalamic stimulation with a right temporal cortical strip and a left thalamic depth electrode, which resulted in a further 50% reduction in seizure frequency. In a second case, a 9-year-old right-handed female with radiological evidence of a small watershed infarct on the left and medically refractory seizures was referred for presurgical evaluation. Invasive monitoring revealed an unresectable seizure focus in the eloquent cortex of the left posterior frontal and parietal lobes. The RNS device was implanted with cortical leads placed at the putative seizure focus. At 21 months after surgery, the patient had been seizure free for 4 months, following a 17-month period in which the seizure frequency had decreased from 12 per month to 2 per month, with associated functional and behavioral improvement. The authors' results suggest that RNS may be a palliative option for children with intractable seizures whose condition warrants off-label use of the surgical device. The improved therapeutic effect noted with time and sustained RNS treatment points to a possible neuromodulatory effect.

First-aid management of tonic-clonic seizures among healthcare personnel: A survey by the Apulian section of the Italian League Against Epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the knowledge of healthcare workers about first-aid measures to be performed during and after a tonic-clonic seizure.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four healthcare workers (86 physicians) working at 8 tertiary hospitals in the Apulia region, Italy, responded to a questionnaire comprising of 28 questions based on available Italian and international recommendations about what to do during a tonic-clonic seizure.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-four healthcare workers completed and returned surveys with a response rate of 96.25%. There were 55 nurses (35.7%), 86 physicians (55.8%), and 13 healthcare workers with different roles (Electroencephalograph technicians, psychologists, social workers). Among physicians, there were 7 cardiologists, 3 surgeons, 12 infectious-disease specialists, 11 internal medicine specialists, 2 psychiatrists, 2 gynecologists, 27 specialists working in the emergency department, and 22 physicians with different specializations. Nearly 90% of the respondents identified head protection as important first aid, while 100% responded to not keep the legs elevated. To avoid tongue bite, both physicians and other healthcare workers would put something in the mouth (54.0%), like a Guedel cannula (71.0%) fingers (29.5%). Grabbing arms and legs, trying to stop the seizure, would be potentially performed by 11.6% of our sample. Physicians would administer a benzodiazepine during the seizure (65.7%) and during the postictal phase (29.2%), even if the patient is known to have epilepsy (23.7%), and in this case, 11.3% of respondents would administer the usual antiepileptic medications. More than half of respondents would call the emergency telephone number, because of necessary hospitalization in case of tonic-clonic seizure, even if it is experienced by a patient known to have epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Our survey suggests the need for epilepsy educational programs on first-aid management of seizures among healthcare workers.

Knowledge and Awareness of Epilepsy Surgery among Medical Students

Background and Purpose

Surgery is an alternative treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Positive attitude of medical personnel towards epilepsy surgery is essential. This study assessed general knowledge of and attitude towards epilepsy surgery among medical students. The aim of this study was to assess general knowledge of and attitude towards epilepsy surgery among medical students.

Methods

Questionnaire was distributed to medical students. Questionnaire consisted of two questions of general knowledge of drug-resistant epilepsy, questions of students’ attitude towards epilepsy surgery and questions of referral of patients. The Chi-square test was utilized.

Results

The terms “drug-resistant epilepsy” and “mesial temporal sclerosis” were known in 72.3 and 14.2 percent, respectively. Awareness and support of epilepsy surgery were recorded in 74.5 and 48.9 percent, respectively. A drug resistant patient would have been referred to a qualified centre in 19.4 percent. General knowledge and awareness of epilepsy surgery were better in higher levels of study (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Medical students have a positive attitude towards epilepsy surgery. Students are aware of drug resistance in epilepsy. Knowledge and awareness are better among students in higher levels, after neurology is introduced to the curriculum. We conclude that highlighting the importance of epilepsy surgery should be continued. Moreover, additional educational effort should be invested in expressing the importance of efficient referral of a patient to a qualified centre.

New Techniques and Progress in Epilepsy Surgery

While open surgical resection for medically refractory epilepsy remains the gold standard in current neurosurgical practice, modern techniques have targeted areas for improvement over open surgical resection. This review focuses on how a variety of these new techniques are attempting to address these various limitations. Stereotactic electroencephalography offers the possibility of localizing deep epileptic foci, improving upon subdural grid placement which limits localization to neocortical regions. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and stereotactic radiosurgery can minimally or non-invasively ablate specific regions of interest, with near real-time feedback for laser interstitial thermal therapy. Finally, neurostimulation offers the possibility of seizure reduction without needing to ablate or resect any tissue. However, because these techniques are still being evaluated in current practice, there are no evidence-based guidelines for their use, and more research is required to fully evaluate their proper role in the current management of medically refractory epilepsy.

Knowledge and Attitudes About Epilepsy Surgery Among Family Doctors in Ontario

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy have medically intractable seizures, and a proportion of them are candidates for surgical treatment. The efficacy and safety of epilepsy surgery have been supported by a large number of studies, yet only a small minority of such patients in Ontario receive surgery.

METHODS

Family physicians in Ontario were surveyed regarding demographics, referral practices and general knowledge about epilepsy surgery. Four hundred surveys were mailed to randomly selected family physicians using contact information from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario website.

RESULTS

The response rate was 50%. The majority of family physicians (81%) always refer patients with epilepsy, most often to neurologists. General knowledge of epilepsy was mixed, with 53.7% feeling that surgery should be considered in selected cases for the treatment of epilepsy, though 53.2% did not know what type of epilepsy could be surgically treated.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest a relatively low level of knowledge among family physicians in terms of when surgery ought to be considered, the types of epilepsy that are amenable to surgical treatment and the risks and benefits of epilepsy surgery. A lack of knowledge in these areas may partly underlie the low referral rates of epilepsy patients, though the results show that the majority of family physicians refer their patients with epilepsy to neurologists. Other factors must be considered, such as access to neurologists, epileptologists and surgical resources. Education campaigns directed at family physicians may improve knowledge and change referral practices. Future studies need to examine these possibilities.

"It was five years of hell": Parental experiences of navigating and processing the slow and arduous time to pediatric resective epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Children with medically refractory epilepsy stand to benefit from surgery and live a life free of seizures. However, a large proportion of potentially eligible children do not receive a timely referral for a surgical evaluation. We aimed to describe experiences during the arduous time before the referral and the parent-reported facilitators that helped them move forward through this slow time.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews with 37 parents of children who had previously undergone epilepsy surgery at UCLA (2006-2011) were recorded, transcribed, and systematically analyzed by two independent coders using thematic analysis. Clinical data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Parents, 41.3years of age on average, were mostly Caucasian, English-speaking, mothers, married, and employed. The mean age at surgery for children was 8.2years with a mean time from epilepsy onset to surgery of 5.4years. Parental decision-making was facilitated when parents eventually received a presurgical referral and navigated to a multidisciplinary team that they trusted to care for their child with medically refractory epilepsy. Four themes described the experiences that parents used to feel a sense of moving forward. The first theme, processing, involved working through feelings and was mostly done alone. The second theme, navigating the complex unknowns of the health-care system, was more active and purposeful. Processing co-occurred with navigating in a fluid intersection, the third theme, which was evidenced by deliberate actions. The fourth theme, facilitators, explained helpful ways of processing and navigating; parents utilized these mechanisms to turn vulnerable times following the distress of their child's diagnosis into an experience of productivity.

SIGNIFICANCE

To limit parental distress and remediate the slow and arduous journey to multidisciplinary care at a comprehensive epilepsy center for a surgical evaluation, we suggest multi-pronged interventions to modify barriers associated with parents, providers, and health-care systems. Based on the facilitators that moved parents of our sample forward, we provide practical suggestions such as increased peer support, developing the role of patient navigators and communication strategies with parents before, during, and after referral to a comprehensive epilepsy center and presurgical evaluation.

Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to surgical trials in epilepsy

Epilepsy surgery is often the only effective treatment in appropriately selected patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, a disease affecting about 30% of those with epilepsy. We review the evidence supporting the use of epilepsy surgery, with a focus on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Second, we identify gaps in knowledge about the benefits of epilepsy surgery for certain populations, the challenges of individualizing the choice of surgery, and our lack of understanding of the mechanisms of surgical outcomes. We conducted a search (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov) on March 2, 2016, to identify epilepsy surgery RCTs, systematic reviews, or health technology assessments (HTAs). Abstracts were screened to identify resective, palliative (e.g., corpus callosotomy, multiple subpial transection [MST]), ablative (e.g., Laser interstitial thermal therapy [LITT], gamma knife radiosurgery [RS]), and neuromodulation (e.g., cerebellar stimulation [CS], hippocampal stimulation [HS], repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS], responsive neurostimulation [RNS], thalamic stimulation [TS], trigeminal nerve stimulation [TNS], and vagal nerve stimulation [VNS]) RCTs. Study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Knowledge gaps were identified. Of 1,205 abstracts, 20 RCTs were identified (resective surgery including corpus callosotomy [n = 7], MST [n = 0], RS [n = 1, 3 papers], LITT [n = 0], CS [n = 1], HS [n = 2], RNS [n = 1], rTMS [n = 1], TNS [n = 1], TS [n = 1], and VNS [n = 5]). Most studies targeted patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and none examined the effectiveness of resective surgical therapies in patients with extra‐TLE (ETLE) or with specific lesions aside from mesial temporal lobe sclerosis. No pediatric surgical RCTs were identified except for VNS. Few RCTs address the effectiveness of surgery in epilepsy and most are of limited generalizability. Future studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of different surgical strategies, better understand the mechanisms of surgical outcomes, and define the ideal surgical approaches, particularly for patients with high or very low cognitive function, normal imaging, or ETLE.