Diagnostic value of sonography in treatment-naive chronic inflammatory neuropathies

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force-Second revision

To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).

Prognostic value of nerve ultrasonography: A prospective multicenter study on the natural history of chronic inflammatory neuropathies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nerve ultrasound is a promising new tool in chronic inflammatory neuropathies. The aim of this study was to determine its prognostic value in a prospective multicenter cohort study including incident and prevalent patients with CIDP and MMN.

METHODS

We enrolled 126 patients with CIDP, and 72 with MMN; 71 were treatment-naive. Patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP; n = 35) were considered as disease controls. Standardized neurological examination, questionnaires, and nerve ultrasonography were obtained at time of inclusion and 1-year follow-up. Nerve size development over time and correlation between nerve size and clinical outcome measures were determined using linear mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Nerve size development over time was heterogeneous. Only in MMN was there a correlation between C5 nerve root size and deterioration of grip strength (-1.3 kPa/mm² (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.3 to -0.2). No other significant correlations between nerve size and clinical outcome measures were found. In MMN, presence of nerve enlargement at inclusion predicted deterioration of grip strength, and MMN patients with enlargement confined to the brachial plexus seemed to have more favorable outcomes. No other predictive effects of sonographic nerve size were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that the natural course of nerve size development in CIDP and MMN is heterogeneous, and that the prognostic value of sonographic nerve enlargement is limited. It had some predictive effect in patients with MMN. Further research in specific subgroups of chronic inflammatory neuropathy is necessary to determine the usefulness of nerve ultrasonography after the diagnostic phase.

Evaluation of the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria in a cohort of CIDP patients

Objective

To evaluate the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in a cohort of patients diagnosed and treated for CIDP in a tertiary university hospital.

Methods

In a monocentric retrospective study of 203 CIDP patients, diagnosed according to expert opinion, we evaluated the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria. Clinical course and nerve conduction studies (NCS) over 1 year from first referral were studied. Secondarily, we compared the clinical and paraclinical characteristics, including nerve ultrasound, of patients who failed with those who fulfilled the criteria in order to identify clinically relevant differences.

Results

At 1 year, 182 (89.7%) patients fulfilled the criteria (156/76.9% definite, 22/10.8% probable, and 4/2% possible). Twenty‐one (10.3%) patients did not because the electrodiagnostic criteria remained negative. These still showed signs of demyelination but did not reach the cut‐off values. They also presented typical, albeit less pronounced, multifocal nerve enlargement in ultrasonography. Mean disability at presentation and 1 year after was significantly lower. Most importantly, a relevant proportion of these patients also responded to therapy (6/21 = 28.6% vs. 82/182 = 45.3% of those fulfilling the criteria).

Interpretation

CIDP diagnosis could be established for 89.7% of patients over the course of 1 year using EFNS/PNS criteria. The remaining patients (10.3%) presented with milder disability, less accentuated demyelination, but otherwise similar characteristics and still considerable probability of treatment response. Failure to fulfill diagnostic criteria should not automatically preclude treatment. Nerve ultrasound should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool to detect signs of inflammation in CIDP.

One nerve suffices: A clinically guided nerve ultrasound protocol for the differentiation of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate diagnostic accuracy of a nerve ultrasound (US) protocol that is individualized to a patient's clinical deficits for the differentiation of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with predominant lower motoneuron disease (ALS/LMND) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).

METHODS

Single-center, prospective, examiner-blinded, diagnostic study in two cohorts. Cohort I (model development): Convenience sample of subjects with ALS/LMND or MMN according to revised El-Escorial or EFNS guidelines. Cohort II (model validation): Consecutively recruited treatment-naïve subjects with suspected diagnosis of ALS/LMND or MMN. Cutoffs for 28 different US values were determined by Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) in cohort I. Area Under The Curve (AUC) of US was compared to nerve conduction studies (NCS). Diagnostic accuracy of US protocols, individualized according to clinical deficits, was compared to former rigid non-individualized protocols and to random examination site selection in cohort II.

RESULTS

48 patients were recruited. In cohort I (28 patients), US had higher ROC AUCs than NCS, US 0.82 (0.12) (mean (standard deviation)), NCS (compound muscle action potential (CMAP) 0.60 (0.09), p < .001; two-sided t-test). US models based on the nerve innervating the clinically most affected muscles had higher correct classification rates (CCRs, 93%) in cohort II than former rigid protocols (85% and 80%), or models with random measurement site selection (66% and 80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically guided US protocols for differentiation of ALS/LMND from MMN increase diagnostic accuracy when compared to clinically unguided protocols. They also require less measurements sites to achieve this accuracy.

Monitoring Clinical Course and Treatment Response in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy During Routine Care: A Review of Clinical and Laboratory Assessment Measures

Importance

Identifying clinical change in many neurologic diseases, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), can be challenging. At the same time, how change is defined heavily influences a patient's diagnostic and treatment pathway. It can be especially problematic when equivocal subjective observations are interpreted as clinically meaningful and then used to make diagnostic and treatment decisions. Change in clinical trials is strictly defined by a preselected metric, but there is a perception that formal outcomes collection during routine clinical care is neither feasible nor necessary. Given the importance placed on how change is interpreted, there is a need to select assessments that can be applied to routine care that are representative of the neurologic disease state.

Observations

For an outcome measure to be useful during clinical trials, it must have good reliability, validity, be responsive to change, and have clinical meaning. To be useful during routine clinical care, the assessment must additionally be easy to collect without the need for extensive training or equipment and should provide an immediately available result that can be rapidly quantified and interpreted. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is clinically heterogeneous and so is best evaluated with a diverse group of assessment tools. Assessing strength impairment, disability, and quality of life is ideally suited for everyday practice when caring for patients with CIDP. While electrophysiologic studies, imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and nodal/paranodal antibodies can provide diagnostic data, they are less practical and helpful longitudinal assessment tools.

Conclusions and Relevance

Sound clinimetric outcome measures in CIDP are widely available and have the potential to help clinicians objectify treatment response and disease progression. Such data are critically important when justifying the need for ongoing or periodic immunotherapy, documenting relapse or deterioration, or providing reassurance of disease improvement, stability, or remission.

Reference values for lower limb nerve ultrasound and its diagnostic sensitivity

We aimed to establish the cross-sectional area (CSA) reference values for peripheral nerves of lower extremities in a healthy Chinese population, and to determine their diagnostic values for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type1A (CMT1A). One hundred eleven healthy subjects, 15-70 years of age, as well as 104 CIDP patients and 26 CMT1A patients were recruited. CSA at predetermined sites of the tibial, fibular, sciatic and sural nerves was measured. The CSA of the tibial nerve ranged from 10.2 ± 1.9 to 20.7 ± 3.6 mm², and for fibular nerve from 8.4 ± 1.8 to 9.5 ± 1.9 mm². 86% CIDP patients had upper limb nerve enlargement, while only 67% had lower limb nerve enlargement. In CIDP patients with normal upper limb ultrasound, 56% (5/9) would have lower limb nerve enlargement. All CMT1A patients had both upper and lower limb nerve enlargement. Addition of lower limb nerve ultrasound showed no added value in diagnosis of CMT1A, but could be supplementary for CIDP when upper limb ultrasound is normal.

Changes of clinical, neurophysiological and nerve ultrasound characteristics in CIDP over time: a 3-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, in a prospective study, high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) changes of nerve segments in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and their relationships with clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDX) characteristics.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients with CIDP were included in a 3-year follow-up (FU) study. Each patient underwent neurologic examination, EDX and HRUS study. HRUS was performed on median, ulnar and peroneal nerves, yielding a total of 319 scanned nerve segments. INCAT and MRC-sum scores, motor nerve conduction velocity (NCV), compound muscle action potential (cMAP) amplitude, and nerve cross-sectional area (NCSA) were collected at baseline and at FU end, and were used for statistical analysis. Twenty-two healthy individuals, matched to patients for age and BMI, served as controls.

RESULTS

NCSA was higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.0001) and showed significant direct correlation with disease severity, and inverse correlation with NCV and cMAP amplitude, both at baseline and at FU end. Disease duration, clinical scores and EDX were predictors of NCSA enlargement at both time points. During FU, NCSA increased in 51% of nerve segments (p = 0.006), in correlation with INCAT increase and with NCV and cMAP reduction. Considering EDX changes in subgroups that reflect the different types of nerve damage, NCSA significantly increased in those nerve segments that from normal EDX switched to prevalent myelinopathic EDX characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerve size tends to increase over time in patients with CIDP, in correlation with clinical and EDX changes, in particular in those nerve segments that undergo a predominantly demyelinating damage.

Diagnostic Value of Multislice Spiral CT Cardiothoracic Combined with Angiography in Acute Chest Pain

Acute chest pain is a common clinical emergency condition with a variety of causes, including acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, aortic coarctation, and pneumothorax. It is essential for emergency physicians to quickly and accurately understand the cause of acute chest pain. 64-slice spiral CT combined cardiothoracic angiography is an accurate and rapid way to diagnose and differentiate the cause of acute chest pain. 64-slice combined cardiothoracic angiography can accurately and rapidly display the thoracic aorta, both pulmonary arteries, the main trunk of the coronary artery and its major branches, and also provide a comprehensive view of both lungs and mediastinum, which is an effective test for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of acute chest pain. Based on this, this study further investigated the value of 64-slice spiral CT triplex examination in the diagnosis of acute chest pain. The results showed that 64-slice spiral CT has the advantages of fast scanning speed, high resolution, and advanced postprocessing technology, and combined cardiothoracic angiography can quickly and accurately help emergency physicians analyze the cause of acute chest pain, which plays a very important role in formulating the correct treatment plan in a timely manner. At the same time, with the continuous development of CT technology, the temporal and spatial resolution has improved the quality of CT images, giving us more options to reduce the effective radiation dose and reduce the total amount of contrast, making the 64-row spiral CT cardiothoracic imaging more perfect.

Ultrasound scanning in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies

Nerve ultrasound scanning has become a valuable diagnostic tool in the routine workup of peripheral nerve disorders, effectively complementing conventional electrodiagnostic studies. The most relevant sonographic features are nerve size and structural integrity. Several peripheral neuropathies show characteristic and distinct patterns of nerve enlargement, allowing their early and accurate identification, and reducing test-burden and diagnostic delay for patients. In mononeuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, nerve enlargement develops only at specific sites of entrapment, while in polyneuropathy the nerve enlargement may be multifocal, regional or even diffuse. Nerve ultrasound scanning can reliably identify chronic inflammatory neuropathies, even when extensive electrodiagnostic studies fail, and it should therefore be embedded in routine diagnostic workup of peripheral neuropathies. In this paper we describe a potential diagnostic strategy to achieve this.

Nerve Ultrasound as Helpful Tool in Polyneuropathies

Background: Polyneuropathies (PNP) are a broad field of diseases affecting millions of people. While the symptoms presented are mostly similar, underlying causes are abundant. Thus, early identification of treatable causes is often difficult. Besides clinical data and basic laboratory findings, nerve conduction studies are crucial for etiological classification, yet limited. Besides Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) has become a noninvasive, fast, economic and available tool to help distinguish different types of nerve alterations in neuropathies. Methods: We aim to describe typical ultrasound findings in PNP and patterns of morphological changes in hereditary, immune-mediated, diabetic, metabolic and neurodegenerative PNP. Literature research was performed in PubMed using the terms ‘nerve ultrasound’, neuromuscular ultrasound, high-resolution nerve ultrasound, peripheral nerves, nerve enlargement, demyelinating, hereditary, polyneuropathies, hypertrophy’. Results: Plenty of studies over the past 20 years investigated the value of nerve ultrasound in different neuropathies. Next to nerve enlargement, patterns of nerve enlargement, echointensity, vascularization and elastography have been evaluated for diagnostic terms. Furthermore, different scores have been developed to distinguish different etiologies of PNP. Conclusions: Where morphological alterations of the nerves reflect underlying pathologies, early nerve ultrasound might enable a timely start of available treatment and also facilitate follow up of therapy success.

Comprehensive approaches for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most common chronic inflammatory neuropathy. CIDP is diagnosed according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria, which combine clinical features with the electrophysiological evidence of demyelination. However, firstly, diagnosis is challenging, as some patients e.g. with severe early axonal damage do not fulfil the criteria. Secondly, objective and reliable tools to monitor the disease course are lacking. Thirdly, about 25% of CIDP patients do not respond to evidence-based first-line therapy. Recognition of these patients is difficult and treatment beyond first-line therapy is based on observational studies and case series only. Individualized immunomodulatory treatment does not exist due to the lack of understanding of essential aspects of the underlying pathophysiology.

Novel diagnostic imaging techniques and molecular approaches can help to solve these problems but do not find enough implementation. This review gives a comprehensive overview of novel diagnostic techniques and monitoring approaches for CIDP and how these can lead to individualized treatment and better understanding of pathophysiology.

Diagnostic challenges in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) consists of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nerves, causing weakness and sensory symptoms. Diagnosis often is challenging, because of the heterogeneous presentation and both mis- and underdiagnosis are common. Nerve conduction study (NCS) abnormalities suggestive of demyelination are mandatory to fulfil the diagnostic criteria. On the one hand, performance and interpretation of NCS can be difficult and none of these demyelinating findings are specific for CIDP. On the other hand, not all patients will be detected despite the relatively high sensitivity of NCS abnormalities. The electrodiagnostic criteria can be supplemented with additional diagnostic tests such as CSF examination, MRI, nerve biopsy, and somatosensory evoked potentials. However, the evidence for each of these additional diagnostic tests is limited. Studies are often small without the use of a clinically relevant control group. None of the findings are specific for CIDP, meaning that the results of the diagnostic tests should be carefully interpreted. In this update we will discuss the pitfalls in diagnosing CIDP and the value of newly introduced diagnostic tests such as nerve ultrasound and testing for autoantibodies, which are not yet part of the guidelines.

A Hand-Held Ultrasound Device for the Assessment of Peripheral Nerves in Leprosy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mycobacterium leprae complex affects peripheral nerves, causing nerve enlargement. This proof-of-concept pilot study was conducted to determine if a small hand-held ultrasound device can accurately identify nerve involvement in individuals with leprosy.

METHODS

Peripheral nerve ultrasound was conducted of the bilateral median (wrist, forearm, elbow, and mid-humerus), ulnar (wrist, forearm, elbow, 4 cm proximal to the elbow, and mid-humerus), C5 root, and greater auricular nerves with a standard ultrasound device (15 Mhz) and a hand-held ultrasound device (5 MHz). Nerve cross-sectional areas were compared using the two devices.

RESULTS

Eight individuals with leprosy were examined. Strong correlation was found between the standard and hand-held ultrasound devices (r = .76, P < .001). A certain amount of variability between ultrasound devices may occur for multiple reasons.

CONCLUSION

A hand-held ultrasound device can readily identify nerve enlargement in individuals with leprosy. This type of device may assist in the diagnosis of leprosy in areas with limited healthcare resources because of the portability and low-cost nature of such devices.

[Pronounced proximally accentuated changes in high-voltage stimulation and nerve ultrasound in long-standing therapy-naive CIDP variants]

The differential diagnosis of chronic demyelinating polyneuropathy particularly includes inflammatory (CIDP) and hereditary causes. Using the example of a 63-year-old patient, we show the diagnostic procedure with conventional electrophysiological diagnostics and additionally by the use of proximal nerve conduction studies with high-voltage stimulation (HVS) and the direct morphological examination by high-resolution nerve ultrasound. In the present case, the focal accentuation of the changes in HVS and the equally pronounced focal thickening of the most affected ulnar nerve in ultrasound confirmed the diagnosis of CIDP instead of hereditary neuropathy.

Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound imaging of sural nerve: A comparative study with nerve biopsy in progressive neuropathies

INTRODUCTION

Nerve ultrasound has been used increasingly in clinical practice as a complementary test for diagnostic assessment of neuropathies, but nerve biopsy remains invaluable in certain cases. The aim of this study was to compare ultra-high-frequency ultrasound (UHF-US) to histologic findings in progressive polyneuropathies.

METHODS

Ten patients with severe, progressive neuropathies underwent ultrasound evaluation of the sural nerve before nerve biopsy. Ultrasound data were compared with histologic results in a retrospective manner.

RESULTS

Sural nerves were easily identified on UHF-US. Nerve hyperechogenicity correlated with inflammatory infiltrates on biopsy. Nerve fascicles could be identified and measured on ultrasound in the majority of patients.

DISCUSSION

Hyperechogenicity on UHF-US may be a marker of nerve inflammation in neuropathies. Furthermore, the UHF-US probe allows for evaluation of sensory nerves in spite of their small size, providing valuable information on their size and on their internal structure.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy and Its Variants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and its variants comprise a group of immune-mediated neuropathies with distinctive clinical presentations and electrodiagnostic features. Prompt recognition of these treatable disorders is mandatory as delays result in significant disability and morbidity. This article highlights the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment approach of these polyneuropathies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The spectrum of CIDP is expanding with the recent characterization of neuropathies associated with nodal and paranodal antibodies. These neuropathies are distinguished by their unique presentations and are often refractory to IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Subcutaneous immunoglobulins have recently been approved as a treatment option for CIDP and join corticosteroids, IVIg, and plasma exchange as first-line treatment.

SUMMARY

CIDP is characterized by progressive symmetric proximal and distal weakness, large fiber sensory loss, and areflexia, with clinical nadir reached more than 8 weeks after symptom onset. Autoimmune demyelinating neuropathies fall on a continuum, with differences in the type of nerve fibers affected and pattern of deficits. Distinguishing between typical CIDP and its variants allows for selection of the most appropriate treatment.

Quantitative assessment of brachial plexus MRI for the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory neuropathies

Objective

This study aimed at developing a quantitative approach to assess abnormalities on MRI of the brachial plexus and the cervical roots in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and to evaluate interrater reliability and its diagnostic value.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study in 50 patients with CIDP, 31 with MMN and 42 disease controls. We systematically measured cervical nerve root sizes on MRI bilaterally (C5, C6, C7) in the coronal [diameter (mm)] and sagittal planes [area (mm²)], next to the ganglion (G₀) and 1 cm distal from the ganglion (G₁). We determined their diagnostic value using a multivariate binary logistic model and ROC analysis. In addition, we evaluated intra- and interrater reliability.

Results

Nerve root size was larger in patients with CIDP and MMN compared to controls at all predetermined anatomical sites. We found that nerve root diameters in the coronal plane had optimal reliability (intrarater ICC 0.55–0.87; interrater ICC 0.65–0.90). AUC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.87) for measurements at G₀ and 0.81 (95% CI 0.72–0.91) for measurements at G₁. Importantly, our quantitative assessment of brachial plexus MRI identified an additional 10% of patients that showed response to treatment, but were missed by nerve conduction (NCS) and nerve ultrasound studies.

Conclusion

Our study showed that a quantitative assessment of brachial plexus MRI is reliable. MRI can serve as an important additional diagnostic tool to identify treatment-responsive patients, complementary to NCS and nerve ultrasound.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10232-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nerve ultrasonography findings as possible pitfall in differential diagnosis between hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN) is a rare form of treatable severe progressive sensory-motor and autonomic polyneuropathy. Albeit usually axonal, late-onset ATTRv-PN can show clear demyelinating features at electrodiagnostic studies, sometimes fulfilling CIDP diagnostic criteria. High-resolution nerve ultrasonography (HRUS) is an emerging useful supportive tool in the diagnosis of CIDP. Herein, we present a late-onset ATTRv-PN patient in which both clinical-neurophysiological and HRUS features could have led to a CIDP misdiagnosis. Nerve alterations at HRUS and MRI have already been reported in ATTRv-PN, albeit not in ATTRv-PN patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic features of CIDP. Our case shows that ATTRv-PN could present the same morphological nerve alterations pattern of CIDP at ultrasonography, adding HRUS findings as a further source of misdiagnosis late-onset ATTRv-PN.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy-Diagnostic pitfalls and treatment approach

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is characterized by progressive weakness and sensory loss, often affecting patients' ability to walk and perform activities of daily living independently. With the lack of a diagnostic biomarker, the diagnosis relies on clinical suspicion, clinical findings, and the demonstration of demyelinating changes on electrodiagnostic (EDx) testing and nerve pathology. As a result, patients can often be misdiagnosed with CIDP and unnecessarily treated with immunotherapy. Interpreting the EDx testing and cerebrospinal fluid findings in light of the clinical phenotype, recognizing atypical forms of CIDP, and screening for CIDP mimickers are the mainstays of the approach to patients suspected of having CIDP, and are detailed in this review. We also review the currently available treatment options, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids (CCS), and plasma exchange (PE), and discuss how to approach treatment-refractory cases. Finally, we emphasize the need to adopt objective outcome measures to monitor treatment response.

Textural markers of ultrasonographic nerve alterations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Ultrasound has revealed cross-sectional nerve area (CSA) reduction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but little is known about the sonographic nerve texture beyond CSA alterations. In a large cohort of 177 ALS patients and 57 control subjects, we investigated the covariance and disease-specific signature of several sonographic texture features of the median and ulnar nerves and their relationship to the patients' clinical characteristics. ALS patients showed atrophic nerves, a loss of the intranerve structures' echoic contrast, elevated coarseness, and a trend toward lower cluster shading compared with controls. A reduction in intranerve echoic contrast was related to longer disease duration and poorer functional status in ALS. Sonographic texture markers point toward a significant reorganization of the deep nerve microstructure in ALS. Future studies will be needed to further substantiate the markers' potential to assess peripheral nerve alterations in ALS.

Clinical outcomes in multifocal motor neuropathy: A combined cross-sectional and follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical course of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) in a large cohort of patients and to identify predictive factors of a progressive disease course.

METHODS

Between May 2015 and February 2016, we collected clinical data from 100 patients with MMN, of whom 60 had participated in a nationwide cross-sectional cohort study in 2007. We documented clinical characteristics using standardized questionnaires and performed a standardized neurologic examination. We used multiple linear regression analysis to identify factors that correlated with worse outcome.

RESULTS

We found that age at diagnosis (45.2 vs 48.6 years, p < 0.02) was significantly increased between 2007 and 2015-2016, whereas diagnostic delay decreased by 15 months. Seven out of 10 outcome measures deteriorated over time (all p < 0.01). Patients who had a lower Medical Research Council (MRC) sumscore and absence of 1 or more reflexes at the baseline visit showed a greater functional loss at follow-up (p = 0.007 and p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that MMN is a progressive disease. Although 87% of patients received maintenance treatment, muscle strength, reflexes, vibration sense, and the Self-Evaluation Scale score significantly deteriorated over time. Lower MRC sumscore and absence of reflexes predicted a more progressive disease course.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that lower MRC sumscore and the absence of reflexes predict a more progressive disease course in patients with MMN.

Peripheral Nerve Imaging Aids in the Diagnosis of Immune-Mediated Neuropathies-A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of immune-mediated neuropathies and their differentiation from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) can be challenging, especially at early disease stages. Accurate diagnosis is, however, important due to the different prognosis and available treatment options. We present one patient with a left-sided dorsal flexor paresis and initial suspicion of ALS and another with multifocal sensory deficits. In both, peripheral nerve imaging was the key for diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and 7T or 3T magnetic resonance neurography (MRN).

RESULTS

In both patients, HRUS revealed mild to severe, segmental or inhomogeneous, nerve enlargement at multiple sites, as well as an area increase of isolated fascicles. MRN depicted T2 hyperintense nerves with additional contrast-enhancement.

DISCUSSION

Peripheral nerve imaging was compatible with the respective diagnosis of an immune-mediated neuropathy, i.e., multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) in patient 1 and multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM) in patient 2. Peripheral nerve imaging, especially HRUS, should play an important role in the diagnostic work-up for immune-mediated neuropathies and their differentiation from ALS.

Nerve ultrasound for diagnosing chronic inflammatory neuropathy: A multicenter validation study

OBJECTIVE

To validate the diagnostic accuracy of a previously described short sonographic protocol to identify chronic inflammatory neuropathy (CIN), including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), Lewis Sumner syndrome, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and to determine the added value of nerve ultrasound to detect treatment-responsive patients compared to nerve conduction studies (NCS) in a prospective multicenter study.

METHODS

We included 100 consecutive patients clinically suspected of CIN in 3 centers. The study protocol consisted of neurologic examination, laboratory tests, NCS, and nerve ultrasound. We validated a short sonographic protocol (median nerve at forearm, upper arm, and C5 nerve root) and determined its diagnostic accuracy using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society criteria of CIDP/MMN (reference standard). In addition, to determine the added value of nerve ultrasound in detecting treatment-responsive patients, we used previously published diagnostic criteria based on clinical, NCS, and sonographic findings and treatment response (alternative reference standard).

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of the sonographic protocol for CIN according to the reference standard were 87.4% and 67.3%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of this protocol according to the alternative reference standard were 84.6% and 72.8%, respectively, and of NCS 76.1% and 93.4%. With addition of nerve ultrasound, 44 diagnoses of CIN were established compared to 33 diagnoses with NCS alone.

CONCLUSIONS

A short sonographic protocol shows high diagnostic accuracy for detecting CIN. Nerve ultrasound is able to detect up to 25% more patients who respond to treatment.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This multicenter study provides Class IV evidence that nerve ultrasound improves diagnosis of CIN.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in clinical practice: A survey among Dutch neurologists

The diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is often a challenge. The clinical presentation is diverse, accurate biomarkers are lacking, and the best strategy to initiate and maintain treatment is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine how neurologists diagnose and treat CIDP. We conducted a cross‐sectional survey on diagnostic and treatment practices among Dutch neurologists involved in the clinical care of CIDP patients. Forty‐four neurologists completed the survey (44/71; 62%). The respondents indicated to use the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) 2010 CIDP guideline for the diagnosis in 77% and for treatment in 50%. Only 57% of respondents indicated that the presence of demyelinating electrophysiological findings was mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of CIDP. Most neurologists used intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) as first choice treatment, but the indications to start, optimize, or withdraw IVIg, and the use of other immune‐modulatory therapies varied. University‐affiliated respondents used the EFNS/PNS 2010 diagnostic criteria, nerve imaging tools, and immunosuppressive drugs more often. Despite the existence of an international guideline, there is considerable variation among neurologists in the strategies employed to diagnose and treat CIDP. More specific recommendations regarding: (a) the minimal set of electrophysiological requirements to diagnose CIDP, (b) the possible added value of nerve imaging, especially in patients not meeting the electrodiagnostic criteria, (c) the most relevant serological examinations, and (d) the clear treatment advice, in the new EFNS/PNS guideline, would likely support its implementation in clinical practice.

Low interrater reliability of brachial plexus MRI in chronic inflammatory neuropathies

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus shows nerve thickening in approximately half of the patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). The reliability of qualitative evaluation of brachial plexus MRI has not been studied previously.

Methods

We performed an interrater study in a retrospective cohort of 19 patients with CIDP, 17 patients with MMN, and 14 controls. The objective was to assess interrater variability between radiologists by using a predefined scoring system that allowed the distinction of no, possible, or definite nerve thickening.

Results

Raters agreed in 26 of 50 (52%) brachial plexus images; κ‐coefficient was 0.30 (SE 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.14–0.46, P < .0005).

Discussion

Our results provide evidence that interrater reliability of qualitative evaluation of brachial plexus MRI is low. Objective criteria for abnormality are required to optimize the diagnostic value of MRI for inflammatory neuropathies.

See editorial on pages 679–680 in this issue.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: controversies and priorities

Despite 30 years of research there are still significant unknowns and controversies associated with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) including disease pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria and treatment. Foremost relates to the underlying pathophysiology, specifically whether MMN represents an axonal or demyelinating neuropathy and whether the underlying pathophysiology is focused at the node of Ranvier. In turn, this discussion promotes consideration of therapeutic approaches, an issue that becomes more directed in this evolving era of precision medicine. It is generally accepted that MMN represents a chronic progressive immune-mediated motor neuropathy clinically characterised by progressive asymmetric weakness and electrophysiologically by partial motor conduction block. Anti-GM1 IgM antibodies are identified in at least 40% of patients. There have been recent developments in the use of neuromuscular ultrasound and MRI to aid in diagnosing MMN and in further elucidation of its pathophysiological mechanisms. The present Review will critically analyse the knowledge accumulated about MMN over the past 30 years, culminating in a state-of-the-art approach to therapy.

Nerve ultrasound improves detection of treatment-responsive chronic inflammatory neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

To examine the diagnostic accuracy of nerve ultrasound in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of chronic inflammatory neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Lewis-Sumner syndrome, and multifocal motor neuropathy, and to determine the added value in the detection of treatment-responsive patients.

METHODS

Between February 2015 and July 2018, we included 100 consecutive incident patients with a clinical suspicion of chronic inflammatory neuropathy. All patients underwent nerve ultrasound, extensive standardized nerve conduction studies (NCS), and other relevant diagnostic investigations. We evaluated treatment response using predefined criteria. A diagnosis of chronic inflammatory neuropathy was established when NCS were abnormal (fulfilling criteria of demyelination of the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society) or when the degree of nerve enlargement detected by sonography was compatible with chronic inflammatory neuropathy and there was response to treatment.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of chronic inflammatory neuropathy was established in 38 patients. Sensitivity and specificity of nerve ultrasound and NCS were 97.4% and 69.4% and 78.9% and 93.5%, respectively. The added value of nerve ultrasound in detection of treatment-responsive chronic inflammatory neuropathy was 21.1% compared to NCS alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve ultrasound and NCS are complementary techniques with superior sensitivity in the former and specificity in the latter. Addition of nerve ultrasound significantly improves the detection of chronic inflammatory neuropathies. Therefore, it deserves a prominent place in the diagnostic workup of chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that nerve ultrasound is an accurate diagnostic tool to detect chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI and ultrasound in chronic immune-mediated neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the diagnostic performance of qualitative and (semi-)quantitative MRI and ultrasound for distinguishing chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) from segmental spinal muscular atrophy (sSMA).

METHODS

Patients with CIDP (n = 13), MMN (n = 10), or sSMA (n = 12) and healthy volunteers (n = 30) were included. MRI of the brachial plexus, using short tau inversion recovery (STIR), nerve-specific T2-weighted (magnetic resonance neurography [MRN]), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences, was evaluated. Furthermore, with ultrasound, cross-sectional areas of the nerves were evaluated. Three radiologists blinded for diagnosis qualitatively scored hypertrophy and increased signal intensity (STIR and MRN), and intraobserver and interobserver agreement was assessed. For the (semi-)quantitative modalities, group differences and receiver operator characteristics were calculated.

RESULTS

Hypertrophy and increased signal intensity were found in all groups including healthy controls. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements varied considerably (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.00-0.811 and 0.101-0.491, respectively). DTI showed significant differences (p < 0.05) among CIDP, MMN, sSMA, and controls for fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity in the brachial plexus. Ultrasound showed significant differences in cross-sectional area (p < 0.05) among CIDP, MMN, and sSMA in upper arm and brachial plexus. For distinguishing immune-mediated neuropathies (CIDP and MMN) from sSMA, ultrasound yielded the highest area under the curve (0.870).

CONCLUSION

Qualitative assessment of hypertrophy and signal hyperintensity on STIR or MRN is of limited value. DTI measures may discriminate among CIDP, MMN, and sSMA. Currently, ultrasound may be the most appropriate diagnostic imaging aid in the clinical setting.

Muscle thickness measured by ultrasound is reduced in neuromuscular disorders and correlates with clinical and electrophysiological findings

INTRODUCTION

Nerve imaging has a limited role in axonal and muscle fiber loss. In this study, we sought to explore the utility of standardized muscle ultrasound (US) assessment in these clinical scenarios.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study from March to August 2018 of patients attending the neuromuscular clinic. All patients underwent clinical evaluation and standardized muscle thickness measurement by US in seven muscles.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 114 participants, including patients with polyneuropathy, motor neuron disease, and myopathy. The smallest distal muscle thickness was found in patients with polyneuropathy, while the smallest proximal muscle thickness was found in patients with myopathy. Muscle thickness was strongly correlated with muscle strength (r ² = 0.62), electrophysiological findings (r ² : 0.44-0.55), and disability score (r ² = 0.53).

DISCUSSION

Standardized muscle thickness measured by US shows diagnostic usefulness in a spectrum of neuromuscular disorders and correlates with clinical and electrophysiological findings.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: update on diagnosis, immunopathogenesis and treatment

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy typically characterised by symmetrical involvement, and proximal as well as distal muscle weakness (typical CIDP). However, there are several 'atypical' subtypes, such as multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (Lewis-Sumner syndrome) and 'distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy', possibly having different immunopathogenesis and treatment responses. In the absence of diagnostic and pathogenetic biomarkers, diagnosis and treatment may be difficult, but recent progress has been made in the application of neuroimaging tools demonstrating nerve hypertrophy and in identifying subgroups of patients who harbour antibodies against nodal proteins such as neurofascin and contactin-1. Despite its relative rarity, CIDP represents a significant economic burden, mostly due to costly treatment with immunoglobulin. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of subcutaneous as well as intravenous immunoglobulin as maintenance therapy, and newer immunomodulating drugs can be used in refractory cases. This review provides an overview focusing on advances over the past several years.

Clinicopathological characteristics of subtypes of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and pathological correlations characterising each clinical subtype of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

We assessed 106 consecutive patients who had CIDP fulfilling the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society criteria and had been referred for sural nerve biopsy. Patients with anti-neurofascin 155, anti-contactin 1 and anti-LM1 antibodies were excluded.

RESULTS

55 patients were classified as having typical CIDP. Regarding atypical CIDP, the multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM) (n=15), distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS) (n=16) and pure sensory (n=15) forms were major subtypes, while the pure motor (n=4) and focal (n=1) forms were rare. Nerve conduction studies revealed that distal motor latencies and F-wave latencies were markedly prolonged in the typical CIDP group but relatively preserved in the MADSAM group. Motor conduction velocity was conspicuously slowed in the DADS group, and distal motor latencies were markedly prolonged in the pure sensory group. Sural nerve biopsy specimens from patients with MADSAM, DADS and pure sensory type tended to show extreme variation in myelinated fibre density among fascicles due to focal myelinated fibre loss or onion-bulb formation, whereas patients with typical CIDP tended to show mild fascicular variation. Epineurial lymphocytic infiltration was conspicuous in cases with marked fascicular variation in myelinated fibre density.

CONCLUSIONS

Preferential involvement of distal and proximal segments and uniform pathological features in typical CIDP indicate a role of humoral factors at sites where the blood-nerve barrier is deficient. By contrast, focal lesions in MADSAM, DADS and pure sensory forms may share neuropathic mechanisms primarily affecting the nerve trunk.

Nerve ultrasound can identify treatment-responsive chronic neuropathies without electrodiagnostic features of demyelination

Introduction

We present a case series of six treatment‐naive patients with clinical phenotypes compatible with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy without electrodiagnostic features of demyelination but with abnormal peripheral ultrasound findings who responded to treatment.

Methods

All six patients underwent a complete set of ancillary investigations, including extensive nerve conduction studies. We also performed standardized nerve ultrasound of median nerves and brachial plexus as part of a larger effort to evaluate diagnostic value of sonography.

Results

Nerve conduction studies did not show conduction block or other signs of demyelination in any of the six patients. Sonographic nerve enlargement was present in all patients and was most prominent in proximal segments of the median nerve and brachial plexus. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin resulted in objective clinical improvement.

Discussion

Our study provides evidence that nerve ultrasound represents a useful complementary diagnostic tool for the identification of treatment‐responsive inflammatory neuropathies.

Neuropathy associated with immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy: A combined sonographic and nerve conduction study

Introduction

We assessed the specific sonographic pattern of structural nerve abnormalities in immunoglobulin M (IgM) neuropathy and disease controls.

Methods

We enrolled 106 incident patients—32 patients with IgM neuropathy, 42 treatment‐naive patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and 32 patients with axonal neuropathies. All patients underwent standardized ancillary testing in addition to standardized sonography of the brachial plexus and the large arm and leg nerves bilaterally.

Results

We found widespread nerve enlargement in IgM neuropathy and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), with specific enlargement of brachial plexus and proximal segments of median nerve but not in axonal disease controls (P < .001). Sonographic nerve hypertrophy in IgM neuropathy was not associated with nerve conduction, clinical, or laboratory characteristics.

Discussion

Immunoglobulin M neuropathy is characterized by widespread nerve enlargement indistinguishable from CIDP. Our data provide evidence to confirm that the disease process is not confined to the more distal parts of nerves in either classical demyelinating or axonal variants of neuropathy with associated IgM.

Neuroimaging markers of clinical progression in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Background:

One of the main goals of novel, noninvasive imaging techniques like high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is the prediction of treatment response for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

Methods:

A total of 17 patients with CIDP were examined prospectively at baseline and every 9 months over a period of 18 months using CCM to quantify corneal nerve degeneration markers and immune cell infiltration as well as HRUS to detect changes of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the peripheral nerves. Additionally, skin biopsy of the distal and proximal leg as well as quantitative sensory testing were performed at the first follow-up visit.

Results:

A value of more than 30 total corneal cells/mm² in CCM at baseline identified patients with clinical progression with a sensitivity/specificity of 100% in our cohort. Corneal nerve fiber density and length remained low and stable over the study period and intra-epidermal fiber density was markedly reduced in the majority of the patients. Furthermore, an increase in Bochum ultrasound score (BUS), which summarizes the CSA of the ulnar nerve in Guyons’ canal, the ulnar nerve in the upper arm, the radial nerve in the spiral groove and the sural nerve between the gastrocnemius muscle, and a maximum BUS of 4 at study initiation identified patients with disease progression (sensitivity 80%, specificity 88%).

Conclusions:

BUS and corneal total cell infiltration seem to represent early markers for clinical progression in CIDP, thus having the potential to identify at-risk patients and impact treatment decisions.

Comparison of high-frequency and ultrahigh-frequency probes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVES

High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS 18-20 MHz) performed on patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) shows a focal enlargement, particularly in the proximal segments of upper-arm motor nerves. Ultrahigh frequency ultrasound (UHFUS 30-70 MHz), having a higher spatial resolution, enables a better characterization of nerve structures. The aim of this study was to compare the two ultrasound probes in the evaluation of motor nerve characteristics in CIDP patients.

METHODS

Eleven patients with definite or probable CIDP underwent an ultrasound evaluation of median and ulnar nerves, bilaterally. Nerve and fascicle cross-sectional area (CSA), vascularization, and echogenicity were assessed.

RESULTS

Nerve and fascicle CSA were increased in the proximal segments, especially in the median nerve, in 9/11 patients and in 10/11 patients at the HFUS and UHFUS evaluations, respectively. A statistically significant difference between CSA values obtained with the two probes was found only for fascicle values. UHFUS allowed for a more precise estimation of fascicle size and number than the HFUS. We were able to identify nerve vascularization in 4/11 patients at UHFUS only.

CONCLUSION

UHFUS gives more detailed information on the changes in the internal nerve structure in CIDP patients. In particular, it permits to better characterize fascicle size and morphology, and to have a precise estimation of their number. Its frequency range also allows to evaluate nerve vascularization.

SIGNIFICANCE

Ultrasound evaluation could become an adjunctive diagnostic tool for CIDP. Further studies are needed to validate the examined parameters as biomarkers for the evaluation and follow-up of CIDP patients.

Ultrasound in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: Clinical and Electrophysiological Correlations

OBJECTIVES

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a treatable autoimmune polyneuropathy, which may prove challenging diagnostically in the setting of absent conduction blocks or advanced axonal loss. Relatively few studies have examined the role of ultrasound (US) in MMN.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients with MMN who underwent peripheral nerve US. Charts were reviewed to extract clinical, sonographic, and electrophysiological data.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with MMN underwent US between 2013 and 2015; of these 11 patients, 7 had ≥3 abnormal nerve segments, and 6 had ≥5 sites of increased cross-sectional area (CSA). There was moderate correlation between the degree of amplitude drop observed in the median and ulnar motor nerves, and CSA. Significant correlation between CSA and limb strength was only observed for the median nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerve US shows promise as a diagnostic tool in MMN and may be helpful to distinguish MMN from motor neuron disease.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis versus Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: Utility of MR Neurography

Background Differential diagnosis between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) relies on clinical examination and electrophysiological criteria. Peripheral nerve imaging might assist this differential diagnosis. Purpose To assess diagnostic accuracy of MR neurography in the differential diagnosis of ALS and MMN. Materials and Methods This prospective study was conducted between December 2015 and April 2017. Study participants with ALS or MMN underwent MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus, midthigh, proximal calf, and midupper arm of the clinically more affected side using high-resolution T2-weighted sequences. Matched healthy study participants who underwent MR neurography served as a control group. Two blinded readers independently rated fascicular lesions and muscle denervation signs on a five-point scale and made an image-only diagnosis, which was compared with the clinical diagnosis to assess diagnostic accuracy (reported for ALS vs non-ALS and MMN vs non-MMN). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare readers' scoring results. Results Twenty-two participants with ALS (12 men and 10 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 62.3 years ± 9.0), eight participants with MMN (seven men and one woman; mean age, 57.6 years ± 18.6), and 15 healthy participants (seven men and eight women; mean age, 59.1 years ± 10.9) were enrolled in this study. Nerves of participants with ALS either appeared normal or showed T2-weighted hyperintensities without fascicular enlargement (reader 1, 22 of 22 participants; reader 2, 21 of 22 participants). In contrast, nerves in MMN were characterized by fascicular swellings (reader 1, six of eight participants; reader 2, seven of eight participants). Muscle denervation signs were more prominent in ALS than in MMN. Inter-rater reliability for blinded diagnosis was κ of 0.82. By consensus, the sensitivity to diagnose ALS (vs MMN and healthy control participants) was 19 of 22 (86% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 67%, 95%]). The corresponding specificity was 23 of 23 (100% [95% CI: 86%, 100%]). The sensitivity to diagnose MMN (vs ALS and healthy control participants) was seven of eight (88% [95% CI: 53%, 99%]). The corresponding specificity was 37 of 37 (100% [95% CI: 91%, 100%]). Conclusion MR neurography is an accurate method for assisting in the differential diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multifocal motor neuropathy. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Andreisek in this issue.

Nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the most relevant developments in the fields of nerve ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of treatable inflammatory neuropathies over the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

MRI and nerve ultrasound can accurately identify potentially treatable neuropathies and thereby help to improve diagnosis. Advanced MRI techniques also show potential to dissect pathophysiology. The apparent mismatch between nerve function and morphology is not surprising and reflects different dimensions of the disease process in neuropathies.

SUMMARY

MRI and nerve ultrasound have become useful tools in the diagnosis of inflammatory neuropathies. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Nerve ultrasound: A reproducible diagnostic tool in peripheral neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To determine interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy in a prospective, systematic, multicenter study.

METHODS

We enrolled 20 patients with an acquired chronic demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls in 3 different centers. All participants underwent an extensive nerve ultrasound protocol, including cross-sectional area measurements of median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, and sural nerves, and brachial plexus. Real-time image acquisition was performed blind by a local and a visiting investigator (reference). Five patients were investigated using different types of sonographic devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and a random-effects model was fitted to identify factors with significant effect on interobserver variability.

RESULTS

Systematic differences between measurements made by different investigators were small (mean difference 0.11 mm2 [95% confidence interval 0.00-0.23 mm2]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were generally higher in arm nerves (0.48-0.96) than leg nerves (0.46-0.61). The hospital site and sonographic device did not contribute significantly to interobserver variability in the random-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

Interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy is generally limited, especially in arm nerves. Different devices and a multicenter setting have no effect on interobserver variability. Therefore, nerve ultrasound is a reproducible tool for diagnostics in routine clinical practice and (multicenter) research.

Nerve echogenicity and intranerve CSA variability in high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)

OBJECTIVE

HRUS is increasingly being used in the diagnosis and evaluation of autoimmune neuropathies such as CIDP. Recently, studies focused not only on changes of nerves size, but also the fascicular structure and the echogenicity changes in CIDP. However, little is known about the alterations of echogenicity in the long-term course in CIDP. The aim of this study was to evaluate echogenicity in CIDP patients in a long-term follow-up period and to analyze the benefit of the evaluation of echogenicity compared to nerve size.

METHODS

20 patients fulfilling the definite diagnostic criteria of CIDP received clinical examination, nerve conduction studies and HRUS every 6 months over a median follow-up time of 34 months. Patients were divided into clinically stable/regressive disease course or progressive disease course according to the development of the inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment overall disability sum score. Echogenicity of peripheral nerves was measured semi-automated and quantitative. Echogenicity was divided into three classes by fraction of black: hypoechogenic, mixed hypo-/hyperechogenic, hyperechogenic.

RESULTS

Patients with hyperechogenic arm nerves more frequently show clinical worsening, whereas patients with hypoechogenic arm nerves remain stable or even improved over time. In the long-term course of the disease, echogenicity mostly did not change, and if changes occured echogenicity did not correspond to ODSS changes.

CONCLUSION

Echogenicity of the arm nerves in CIDP may be used as a prognostic marker, but not as a follow-up tool for evaluating clinical changes. Further studies in a larger cohort are needed to confirm these results.

Clinical, Sonographic, and Electrophysiologic Longitudinal Features of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several studies have aimed to find potential biomarkers to simplify the diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and to monitor and predict the disease course. However, reliable markers are still lacking. We aimed to investigate whether high-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) is suitable for monitoring the long-term clinical course of CIDP.

METHODS

Twenty patients fulfilling the definite diagnostic criteria of CIDP received clinical examination, evaluation of the INCAT (inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment) overall disability sum score (ODSS) as well as nerve conduction studies, and HRUS every 6 months over a median follow-up time of 34 months. Patients were divided into clinically stable/regressive disease course or progressive disease course according to the development of the ODSS.

RESULTS

The intranerve cross-sectional-area (CSA) variability of the nerves of the lower extremity increased with disease progression, whereas it remained unchanged in patients with a stable or remitting disease course.

CONCLUSION

Nerve ultrasound can be used as a method to objectify the long-term disease course in CIDP patients. The intranerve CSA variability is suitable for monitoring the clinical course of patients with CIDP.

Nerve ultrasound characterizes AMN polyneuropathy as inhomogeneous and focal hypertrophic

Objective

High-resolution nerve ultrasound (HRUS) is a painless tool to quickly evaluate peripheral nerve morphology in vivo. This study set out to characterize peripheral nerve involvement in X-linked adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) by HRUS.

Methods

Thirteen adults with genetically proven AMN were examined using the Ultrasound pattern sum score (UPSS) to evaluate morphological abnormalities of peripheral nerves, vagal nerves, as well as cervical nerve roots. Ultrasound results were correlated with clinical findings and nerve conduction studies.

Results

UPSS was increased in six out of 13 patients. Nerve enlargement was mostly inhomogeneous and regional. The median, ulnar, and vagal nerves presented with more prominent alterations than nerves of the lower limbs. The proximal-to-distal ratio was significantly enlarged for the median nerve. HRUS findings matched nerve conduction studies, but identified one patient with enlarged nerves and yet normal conduction velocities. Sonographic findings did not correlate with disease duration or disease severity as assessed by the spastic paraplegia rating scale.

Conclusion

HRUS reveals significant multifocal regional nerve swellings with reduced echo intensity as the morphological equivalent of electrophysiological peripheral nerve affection in AMN patients. Ultrasound and NCS characteristics in AMN seem to differ from other demyelinating neuropathies like CIDP or CMT1a.

Trial registration

German clinical-trial-register (DRKS) (DRKS-ID 00005253) Registered 15 October 2013.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0939-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Neuromuscular Ultrasound: Clinical Applications and Diagnostic Values

Advances in high-resolution ultrasound have provided clinicians with unique opportunities to study diseases of the peripheral nervous system. Ultrasound complements the clinical and electrophysiology exam by showing the degree of abnormalities in myopathies, as well as spontaneous muscle activities in motor neuron diseases and other disorders. In experienced hands, ultrasound is more sensitive than MRI in detecting peripheral nerve pathologies. It can also guide needle placement for electromyography exam, therapeutic injections, and muscle biopsy. Ultrasound enhances the ability to detect carpal tunnel syndrome and other focal nerve entrapment, as well as pathological nerve enlargements in genetic and acquired neuropathies. Furthermore, ultrasound can potentially be used as a biomarker for muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy. The combination of electromyography and ultrasound can increase the diagnostic certainty of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, aid in the localization of brachial plexus or peripheral nerve trauma and allow for surveillance of nerve tumor progression in neurofibromatosis. Potential limitations of ultrasound include an inability to image deeper structures, with lower sensitivities in detecting neuromuscular diseases in young children and those with mitochondrial myopathies, due to subtle changes or early phase of the disease. As well, its utility in detecting critical illness neuromyopathy remains unclear. This review will focus on the clinical applications of neuromuscular ultrasound. The diagnostic values of ultrasound for screening of myopathies, neuropathies, and motor neuron diseases will be presented.

Multifocal motor neuropathy in Austria: a nationwide survey of clinical features and response to treatment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare neuropathy and detailed descriptions of larger patient cohorts are scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features of MMN patients and their response to treatment in Austria and to compare these data with those from the literature.

METHODS

Anonymized demographic and clinical data about MMN patients until 31.12.2017 were collected from registered Austrian neurologists. Exploratory statistics on clinical and laboratory features as well as treatment regimens and responses were performed.

RESULTS

57 Patients with MMN were identified, resulting in a prevalence of 0.65/100.000. Mean age of onset was 44.1 ± 13.1 years, the diagnostic delay 5.5 ± 8.4 years. In 77% of patients, symptom onset was in the upper limbs, and in 92%, it occurred in distal muscles. Proximal onset was never observed in the lower limbs. At the final follow-up, the majority of patients had atrophy (88%) in affected regions. Definite motor conduction blocks (CB) were found in 54 patients. Anti-GM1-IgM antibodies were present in 43%. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins improved muscle strength and INCAT score initially, but at last follow-up, both scores deteriorated to values before treatment.

DISCUSSION

The findings of the present study corroborate the previous findings in MMN. Onset typically occurs in the upper limbs and mostly distal, CBs are found in the majority of cases, while anti-GM1-IgM antibodies are detected in only approximately 40%. Our study underlines that the initial good response to treatment fades over time.

Indications for neuromuscular ultrasound: Expert opinion and review of the literature

Over the last two decades, dozens of applications have emerged for ultrasonography in neuromuscular disorders. We wanted to measure its impact on practice in laboratories where the technique is in frequent use. After identifying experts in neuromuscular ultrasound and electrodiagnosis, we assessed their use of ultrasonography for different indications and their expectations for its future evolution. We then identified the earliest papers to provide convincing evidence of the utility of ultrasound for particular indications and analyzed the relationship of their date of publication with expert usage. We found that experts use ultrasonography often for inflammatory, hereditary, traumatic, compressive and neoplastic neuropathies, and somewhat less often for neuronopathies and myopathies. Usage significantly correlated with the timing of key publications in the field. We review these findings and the extensive evidence supporting the value of neuromuscular ultrasound. Advancement of the field of clinical neurophysiology depends on widespread translation of these findings.

IgPro20, the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra® study (PATH), and the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with subcutaneous IgG

Subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) administration may be preferred over the intravenous route (IVIG) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) because it minimizes ‘end of cycle’ treatment-related fluctuations, reduces systemic adverse effects, improves convenience/quality of life and potentially lowers overall costs. Early reports of the use of highly concentrated SCIG preparations suggested they were effective and well-tolerated in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. This was confirmed in the Polyneuropathy and Treatment with Hizentra® study of 172 subjects randomized to receive maintenance therapy with placebo or one of two doses of IgPro20 (20% IgG stabilized with L-Proline) for 6 months. Risk of relapse was reduced by SCIG in a dose-related manner as compared with placebo. A total of 88% of polyneuropathy and treatment with hizentra subjects felt the subcutaneous method was ‘easy to learn’. Local adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, and systemic adverse events were infrequent. Some patients may prefer maintenance therapy with SCIG over IVIG.