Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does It Improve Survival?

Role of estrogen in liver cancer

Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and despite increasing implementation of ultrasonographic surveillance strategies, its incidence is rising, especially in western countries. A universal characteristic of hepatocellular carcinoma is the striking male prevalence that is found, with few exceptions, both in animals and in humans. Many different hypotheses have been put forward in an attempt to explain this finding, which is not a simple epidemiological oddity but could also have pathogenetic implications. An obvious trail to follow, as gender susceptibility is implicated, is the role played by sex hormones, namely estrogens. Estrogens are not simply involved in reproductive mechanisms; instead, it is increasingly evident that they have a role in such an enormous variety of cellular processes that their implication in liver carcinogenesis may be manifold. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the available data, with a special focus on the hormonal mechanisms potentially implicated in the development of liver cancer.

Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United States, primarily due to hepatitis C-related liver disease. Nearly 85%-90% of patients with HCC have underlying chronic liver disease or cirrhosis. Advanced tumor burden or prohibitive hepatic dysfunction precludes operative resection in most patients with HCC. Surgical resection is a treatment option with curative intent in patients with HCC not associated with cirrhosis or in patients with well-compensated liver disease. Tumor extent and hepatic function must be assessed preoperatively to avoid postresection hepatic failure, an often fatal condition that may require urgent liver transplantation. Appropriately selected candidates for liver resection have 5-year postoperative survival rates of 40%-70%, but recurrence rates approach 70%, especially in patients with cirrhosis. For this reason, the best resection for patients with HCC and cirrhosis is orthotopic liver transplantation, which has 5-year posttransplant survival rates of 65%-80% in well-selected candidates.

Trends in local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and survival outcomes in the US population

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) frequently presents with limitations to resection. We investigated survival outcomes after various local HCC therapies in US patients.

DATA SOURCES

Relationships between local HCC therapy modality and overall survival (OS) were analyzed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 1973-2003 database. Of 46,065 patients with primary hepatobiliary malignancy, 5,317 individuals with HCC had sufficient surgical data. The median age was 65 (range 0-105), and 73% of patients were male. The median tumor size was 6 cm (.2-30). There were single lesions (52%), multiple lesions (28%), and extrahepatic disease (20%). Mortality at 30 days was 8.4% (resection), 3.3% (transplantation), 3.2% (ablation), or 31% (no local therapy, P <.0001). Actuarial 5-year survival was 67% after transplantation, 35% after resection, 20% after ablation, and 3% for no or incomplete local therapy (P <.0001). Multivariate prognosticators were surgical modality, disease extent, grade (all at P <.0001), tumor size (P = .01), vascular invasion (P = .02), and age (P = .045). Compared to resection, risk ratios were .56 (transplantation) and 1.53 (ablation).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term HCC survival can be observed after all 3 treatment approaches but is best after transplantation and resection, although likely biased through confounding patient selection variables. Preferred HCC treatment should be individualized based on morbidity and long-term OS prospects.

Management of solitary 1 cm to 2 cm liver nodules in patients with compensated cirrhosis: a decision analysis

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines, based on expert opinion, recommend that suspected 1 cm to 2 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detected on screening be biopsied and, if positive, treated (eg, resection or transplantation). Alternative strategies are immediate treatment or observation until disease progression occurs.

METHODS

A Markov decision model was developed that compared three management strategies - immediate resection, biopsy and resection if positive, and ultrasound surveillance every three months until disease progression - for a single 1 cm to 2 cm liver nodule suspicious for HCC following ultrasound screening and computed tomography confirmation. The cohort included 55-year-old patients with compensated cirrhosis and no significant comorbidities. The model used in the present study incorporated the probabilities of false-positive and false-negative results, needle-track seeding, HCC recurrence, cirrhosis progression and death. The quality-adjusted life expectancy (LE) and the unadjusted LE were evaluated and the model's strength was assessed with sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, biopsy, resection and surveillance yielded an unadjusted LE of 60.5, 59.7 and 56.6 months, respectively, and a quality-adjusted LE of 46.6, 45.6 and 43.8 months, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, biopsy was the preferred strategy 69.5% of the time, resection 30.5% of the time and surveillance never. Resection was the optimal decision if the sensitivity of biopsy was very low (less than 0.45) or if the accuracy of the imaging tests resulted in a high percentage of HCC-positive patients (greater than 76%) in the screened cohort, as with expert interpretation of triphasic computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

The present model suggests that biopsy is the preferred management strategy for these patients. When postimaging probability of HCC is high or pathology expertise is lacking, resection is the best alternative. Surveillance is never the optimal strategy.

Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma and early diagnosis

Good management of patients at risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma includes regular ultrasound surveillance, and aggressive management of lesions detected at ultrasound. Good radiology and good pathology are essential to the appropriate management of these small lesions. With good quality testing it is possible to cure the majority of HCCs using minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation. Such an approach has the potential to convert HCC from a disease in which incidence more or less equaled mortality to one in which cure is frequently possible.

Utilization of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States

BACKGROUND

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been recommended for patients at high-risk of developing HCC. Yet, the utilization and determinants of screening remain unclear.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with HCC at 3 medical centers during 1998 to 2003 were identified. Information regarding receipt of HCC screening, demographics, risk factors, liver disease severity, number of HCC lesions, therapy, and date of death was abstracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate determinants of HCC screening and therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were developed to assess the effect of screening on risk of mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 157 patients diagnosed with HCC. The majority of patients were <65 years (62%), white (59%), had a single mass (42%), and a Child-Pugh-Turcotte score B (41%). Approximately, 28% (n=44) received at least one possible screening test (36% alpha-fetoprotein only, 23% abdominal ultrasound only, 7% computed tomography only; 34% had more than one test). Screened patients were younger [odds ratio (OR)=2.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-5.99) and were more likely to have underlying HCV (OR=2.91; 95% CI: 1.36-6.23), or alcoholic liver disease (OR=4.20; 95% CI: 1.89-9.35). The only predictors of receipt of therapy were presentation at tumor board conference (OR=2.85; 95% CI: 1.42-5.72) and documented referral to oncology (OR=2.33; 95% CI: 1.10-4.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than one-third of patients who were diagnosed with HCC received screening before their diagnosis, and of those a large proportion received an alpha-fetoprotein test only. In this study, the use of screening was too suboptimal to be expected to affect outcomes.

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

This article reviews methodological issues around screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, and discusses selection of the at-risk group, which screening test to use, and how frequently it should be applied. Screening of patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma should be undertaken using ultrasonography applied at six-month intervals. Patients at risk include all those with cirrhosis, and certain non-cirrhotic patients withchronic hepatitis B. In this population, screening has been shown to reduce disease-specific mortality. Although data do not exist for other populations, screening is nonetheless advised because small cancers can be cured with appreciable frequency.

Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as nervous system involvement

To analyze the clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with signs and symptoms of nervous system involvement as the initial presentation. Over a period of 11 years (January 1993 to December 2003), 15,008 HCC patients were identified at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Amongst them, 42 cases had nervous system involvement, of which six had nervous system involvement as their initial presentation. These six cases were enrolled in this study and their clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. The clinical features of the other 36 HCC cases with nervous system involvement were also analyzed for comparison. The six cases were all males, aged 36-68 years old. The involved parts of the nervous system were the cerebellar hemisphere (one), the frontal lobe (one), the sphenoid sinus, sellar turcica, and cavernous sinus (one), the cervical spine (one), and the thoracic spine (two). Their corresponding neurologic presentations were back pain, headache, consciousness disturbance, visual disturbance, and limb weakness. Whilst three out of six patients presenting with nervous system manifestations were found to have concurrent systemic metastases in other expected sites (lung, bone), three had isolated nervous system involvement even after extensive work up. The associated medical conditions of the six cases included hepatitis B (three), hepatitis C (one), liver cirrhosis (two), portal vein thrombosis (three), and diabetes mellitus (two). All the six died within 9 months after the detection of nervous system involvement. The prevalence of nervous system involvement in HCC patients is 0.28% (42/15,088), with 0.04% (6/15,088) having this as their initial presentation. The prognosis of HCC with nervous system involvement is grave. Their clinical and laboratory data are not unique but the diagnosis could only be confirmed by hepatic and nervous system imaging studies, histopathologic examination, and serum alpha-fetoprotein detection. This consideration should be emphasized especially in areas that are hyperendemic for HCC and if the original focus of metastatic lesion is obscure.

Postresection hepatic failure: successful treatment with liver transplantation

Postoperative liver failure (PLF) is a rare but often fatal complication of major hepatic resection. Use of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for PLF remains undefined. We conducted a retrospective review of 435 patients who underwent hepatic resection between 1990 and 2004; 9 of them (2.0%) developed PLF. Indications for resection included primary hepatic malignancies (8), colonic metastases (2), and echinococcic cyst (1); all resections were multisegmental, 6 were extended, and 2 were lobectomies. A total of 7 patients underwent OLT at a mean of 25 days after resection. Patients developing PLF had significantly lower preoperative platelet counts and significant elevations of total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio (INR) by postoperative day 2. Pathological cirrhosis and extended right lobectomy were associated with significantly increased risk of PLF. Following OLT, there were no in-hospital deaths, but 1 patient required retransplantation for primary nonfunction. Mean survival with and without OLT was 42.2 and 1.4 months, respectively (P = 0.03). Following OLT, 1- and 5-yr patient survivals were 88% and 40%, respectively; 1- and 5-yr graft survivals were 75% and 34%, respectively. In conclusion, patients with low platelets, biopsy-proven cirrhosis, or those undergoing extended resection are at increased risk for PLF. OLT for PLF has significant morbidity but allows salvage of an otherwise fatal condition.

Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of anatomic resection on long-term outcomes in patients with pathologic T1-T2 (pT1-T2) hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 158 consecutive patients who underwent either anatomic (n = 95) or nonanatomic (n = 63) resection for pT1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma was conducted. Anatomic resection was defined as the complete removal of at least one Couinaud segment containing the tumor; nonanatomic resection was defined as removal of the tumor plus a rim of nonneoplastic liver parenchyma. The median follow-up time was 83 months.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent anatomic resection were characterized by lower prevalence of cirrhosis (P = .015), more favorable hepatic function (P = .001), larger tumor size (P = .029), and higher prevalence of vascular invasion (P = .008) compared with patients who underwent nonanatomic resection. Anatomic resection provided better survival (median survival time, 122 months) than nonanatomic resection (median survival time, 76 months; P = .0358). Patients who underwent anatomic resection had better disease-free survival (P = .0121). Anatomic resection independently improved both survival (hazard ratio, .46; P = .003) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, .55; P = .008). When stratified for pT classification, the effectiveness of anatomic resection remained only in patients with pT2 tumors in terms of survival (P = .0012) and disease-free survival (P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic resection independently improves long-term survival in patients with T1-T2 hepatocellular carcinoma, probably because of the clearance of venous tumor thrombi within the resected domain.

Molecular pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common life-threatening malignancies in the world. This cancer generally arises within the boundaries of well-defined causal factors, of which viral hepatitis infection, aflatoxin exposure, chronic alcohol abuse, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are the major risk factors. Despite the identification of these etiological agents, hepatocarcinogenesis remains poorly understood. The molecular mechanisms leading to the development of HCC appear extremely complex and only recently have begun to be elucidated. Currently, surgical resection or liver transplantation offer the best chance of cure for the patient with HCC; however, these therapies are hindered by inability of many of these patients to undergo liver resection, by tumor recurrence and by donor shortages. A lack of suitable therapeutic strategies has led to a greater focus on prevention of HCC using antiviral agents and vaccination. Overall, the current outlook for patients with HCC is bleak; however, a better understanding of the molecular and genetic basis of this cancer should lead to the development of more efficacious therapies.

Brain metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma in US patients

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease on the rise in the United States, due to the epidemic of hepatitis C-induced liver disease. Better chemotherapy options, aggressive surgery, and liver transplantation have led to improved patient survival and an increase in late-appearing, distant metastases from HCC. Brain metastases, although formerly thought of as rare manifestations of HCC, may be more likely to come to clinical and pathological attention than extrahepatic metastases in other sites since they often produce clinical symptoms that necessitate neurosurgical intervention and metastasis removal. In addition, brain metastases from HCC are frequently associated with mass-producing hemorrhage, further requiring evacuation. Hence, pathologists are relatively more likely to encounter brain metastases from HCC as surgical specimens than metastases from HCC to some other common sites of spread, such as bone, lymph nodes, or adrenal. Brain metastases from HCC are being increasingly documented in areas of the world with high endemic rates such as Asia, but thus far have only very rarely been reported in patients native to the United States. We describe our institution's experience with three Caucasian US males, two with hepatitis C as risk factors, who developed metastatic HCC to the brain. We expect clinicians and pathologists will encounter more patients with HCC and extrahepatic metastases, particularly those to brain, in the near future.

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

There is currently no evidence that screening patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma reduces mortality from the disease. Nonetheless, screening is widely practiced. Screening is a process that includes selecting patients, applying screening tests, deciding on recall policies, and subsequently proving or disproving the presence of cancer. The literature on screening for hepatocellular carcinoma is confusing at best, and does not adequately consider the many biases that result from uncontrolled and retrospective studies. Nonetheless, screening can be justified because it is likely that mortality is decreased by adequate treatment of small cancers, particularly in the era of liver transplantation. False-positive screening test results are common. Once an abnormal screening result is obtained there is little guidance from the literature as to how patients should be investigated further, nor about how to determine whether the screening test result was a false-positive. This should at minimum include short interval follow-up with CT scans and MRI's.

Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes partial liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT). Although LT represents the most efficient treatment in patients with small HCC, <30% of patients are eligible for LT because of restrictive criteria (one nodule <5 cm or two to three nodules <3 cm without macroscopic vascular invasion), graft unavailability and the high cost of the procedure. For large HCC, LR remains the only potential curative treatment. LR is now safer, with a low rate of mortality. Selective preoperative morphological assessment, preoperative use of portal vein embolization for increasing future remnant liver volume and the improvement of surgical techniques such as the use of intermittent clamping and anterior approach are factors that improve the safety and tolerance of LR. In patients with small HCCs and a preserved liver function (Child-Pugh grade A), good long-term survival can be achieved after anatomical resection that removes the tumor(s) and its portal vein territory. These good results of LR for small HCC and the increasing duration of the waiting list for candidates of LT have renewed the place of LR as a bridge treatment before LT.