Better outcome for suture button compared with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial

Anatomical Study of the Interosseous Ligament of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: An Analysis of Osseous Morphology and Attaching Interposing Structures

BACKGROUND

The morphological features of the interosseous tibiofibular area in relation to the tensile stress of the interosseous ligament (IOL) have rarely been discussed. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the IOL on the basis of osseous surface morphology and macroscopic and histological anatomy. We hypothesized that the osseous surface of the interosseous tibiofibular area has a specific feature corresponding to the fibrous structure in the IOL.

METHODS

Eighteen ankles from 15 cadavers were analyzed. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images were obtained for all specimens to observe the osseous surface in the syndesmosis and to visualize the distribution of cortical bone thickness. Fifteen ankles were macroscopically analyzed, and the other 3 ankles were histologically analyzed.

RESULTS

Micro-CT imaging revealed the osseous prominence on the medial side of the fibula. Cortical thickness mapping showed that the thickness of the cortical bone on the medial side of the fibula proximal to the prominence (mean and standard deviation, 1.4 ± 0.5 mm; p < 0.001) was greater in comparison with the other quadrants, namely, the proximal part of the tibia (0.8 ± 0.2), distal part of the fibula (0.7 ± 0.2), and distal part of the tibia (0.5 ± 0.1). Macroscopic analysis indicated that the perforating branch of the fibular artery ran through the proximal top of the IOL, which formed a thickened fiber and was attached to the fibular prominence. Histological analysis revealed that the thickened fibrous part of the IOL attached to the fibula via the fibrocartilaginous insertion. At the middle of the IOL, thin and fatty-like tissue was interposed between the tibia and the fibula.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that the osseous prominence of the fibula corresponded to the proximal thickened part of the IOL via the fibrocartilaginous attachment. The thickened proximal part of the IOL was consistently found in this location; we believe that this finding was related to the fact that the fibular artery perforated the adjacent distal part of the interosseous membrane (IOM).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The location of the prominence on the medial aspect of the fibula could be a helpful clue as to the ideal location of syndesmotic fixation.

Screw versus suture button in treatment of syndesmosis instability: Comparison using weightbearing CT scan

BACKGROUND

The superiority of screw or suture button fixation for syndesmotic instability remains debatable. Our aim is to compare radiographic outcomes of screw and suture button fixation of syndesmotic instability using weight bearing CT scan (WBCT).

METHODS

Twenty patients with fixation of unilateral syndesmotic instability were recruited and divided among two groups (screw = 10, suture button = 10). All patients had WBCT of both ankles ≥12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

In suture button group, injured side measurements were significantly different from normal side for syndesmotic area (P = 0.003), fibular rotation (P = 0.004), anterior difference (P = 0.025) and direct anterior difference (P = 0.035). In screw group, syndesmotic area was the only significantly different measurement (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

While both screw and suture button didn't completely restore the syndesmotic area as compared to the contralateral uninjured ankle, external malrotation of the fibula was uniquely associated with suture button fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Acute, isolated and unstable syndesmotic injuries are frequently associated with intra-articular pathologies

PURPOSE

Although simultaneous arthroscopy for the surgical treatment of acute isolated, unstable syndesmotic injuries has been recommended, little knowledge is present about the actual frequency of intra-articular pathologies for this injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and severity of intra-articular pathologies detected during arthroscopy and their subsequent treatment in acute isolated, unstable syndesmotic injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients treated by arthroscopic-assisted stabilization for acute isolated, syndesmotic instability was performed. The primary outcome parameter was the frequency of intra-articular pathologies. Secondary outcome parameters were the type of syndesmotic lesion (ligamentous/bony), severity of chondral lesions, MRI findings, treatment details, complications and the identification of factors associated with intra-articular pathologies.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients, 19% female, with a mean age of 37 ± 12 years met the inclusion criteria. 70% suffered isolated ligamentous injuries, the remaining suffered avulsion fractures of the syndesmosis. Chondral lesions occurred in 48% (ICRS grade II: 33%; ICRS grade IV 15%) and intra-articular loose bodies in 11% of patients. Overall, arthroscopy revealed intra-articular pathologies necessitating further treatment in 19% of patients. Neither the type of syndesmotic injury (bony vs. ligamentous; ns) nor the degree of ligamentous instability (West Point IIB vs. III; ns) had a significant influence on the occurrence of chondral lesions. One complication (SSI) occurred. Pre-operative MRI revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 100/79% for chondral lesions and 50/93% for loose bodies.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular pathologies in acute isolated, unstable syndesmotic injuries occur in up to 50% of patients, 19% necessitated additional treatment. Simultaneous arthroscopy, independent of the pre-operative MRI findings, appears reasonable in highly active patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Initial Experience With a Bioresorbable Polymer Anchor

Background

Anchors are frequently used in reconstructive orthopedic surgery to achieve fixation of soft tissue to bone. Anchors vary with respect to material composition, configuration, and methods of fixation at the site of attachment. The fixation component of anchoring devices has generally evolved from metal-fabricated implants to various types of bioresorbable anchors. The SonicAnchor^TM (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI USA) polymer implant provides a unique form of anchor fixation using SonicFusion^TM technology to achieve interdigitation within cancellous bone while being radiolucent and providing a small footprint.

Methods

During a four-year period, 116 patients underwent a reconstructive orthopedic foot and ankle surgical procedure with the use of at least one bioresorbable polymer anchor (SonicAnchor implant). There were 59 males and 57 females, with an average age of 42 years (range: 12-83 years).

Results

A total of 233 bioresorbable anchor (SonicAnchor) implants were used in 116 patients. Of the 116 patients, 108 (93.1%) achieved successful clinical healing of their surgery at their most recent follow-up. The average follow-up duration was 309 days (range: 14-1,429 days). Eight (6.9%) patients were lost to follow-up prior to clinical healing. Two (1.7%) patients underwent reoperation. Also, 65 (56%) patients had at least six months of follow-up and 36 (31%) had at least one year of follow-up.

Conclusions

This preliminary clinical trial of patients undergoing soft tissue repair or reconstruction with a bioresorbable polymer appears to perform comparably to other commercially available devices. The lack of adverse events, mechanical failures, or infections further supports the safety of this device.

Is there any change in surgeon's attitude to the management of ankle fractures accompanying syndesmotic injury? A nationwide survey

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the attitudes of orthopedic surgeons to the management of ankle fractures accompanied by syndesmotic injury with a nationwide survey.

Patients and methods

In the first step of this descriptive study, an electronic survey was prepared in Google drive and a survey link was sent to the Turk-Ortopedi e-mail group between 09 and 19 January 2019. The orthopedic surgeons and residents were requested to complete the questionnaire. A total of 320 orthopedic surgeons (77%) and residents (23%) participated in the survey. The responses were analyzed statistically. To evaluate the changing attitudes, our results were compared with the surgeon survey studies key worded “syndesmotic injury” in PubMed.

Results

The majority of the participants stated that they used the hook test, external rotation stress test, and fluoroscopy together (47.2%) for the diagnosis of syndesmotic injury during the operation. Of the participants, the majority (93%) reported to use metallic syndesmotic screws, and 59% reported to remove the syndesmotic screw routinely. Young surgeons with five to 10 years of experience preferred intraoperative diagnosis methods compared to surgeons with more than 20 years of experience. Foot and ankle surgeons and sports surgeons reported to allow weight bearing before removal of the screw much more than other unspecified branches.

Conclusion

The preferences of the surgeon vary in syndesmotic injuries and there is still no consensus regarding diagnosis and rehabilitation. Compared to the past decade, fewer surgeons prefer to remove the screws today.