Lateral femoral chondral lesions are more frequent when an anterior cruciate ligament tear is concomitant with a lateral femoral notch sign, but do not progress over time

BACKGROUND

The lateral femoral notch sign (LFNS) is caused by an impact to the lateral femoral condyle during a pivot shift injury and affects 25% to 33% of patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chondral lesions 1year after ACL reconstruction, while taking into consideration preoperative chondral damage, in patients with and without a preoperative LFNS. The primary outcome measure was the presence of chondral lesions involving the lateral femoral condyle, confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the Outerbridge classification, at 1year postoperative. The secondary outcome measures were bone bruise of the lateral femoral condyle confirmed on MRI, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner functional scores taken 1year after surgery.

METHODS

Sixty patients were included-30 with preoperative LFNS and 30 without-in a retrospective, comparative study of prospectively collected data on patients operated between August 2018 and December 2020.

RESULTS

A lateral femoral chondral lesion 1year after surgery was significantly more common in the group with a preoperative LFNS (37% [n=11] versus 13% [n=4] in the group without a preoperative LFNS, p=0.036). Adjusting the statistical analysis for preoperative body mass index (BMI) did not impact these results (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=3.83 [95%CI: 1.03-14.24]; p=0.045). Adjusting for a preoperative lateral femoral chondral lesion had an impact on these results (adjusted OR=0.78 [95%CI: 0.12-5.08]; p=0.793). This indicates that a preoperative LFNS is not significantly and independently associated with a lateral femoral chondral lesion at 1year postoperative when the analysis is adjusted for a preoperative lateral femoral chondral lesion. However, having a preoperative lateral femoral chondral lesion is significantly correlated with the presence of a lateral femoral chondral lesion 1year after the surgery (adjusted OR=63.31 [95%CI: 5.94-674.8]; p=0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of bone bruise on MRI (p=1.0), or for the IKDC (p=0.310), Lysholm (p=0.416) and Tegner (p=0.644) functional scores. The LFNS was still present in 21 out of 30 patients (70%) at 1year postoperative. The preoperative LFNS was significantly smaller in the group without a chondral lesion compared to the group with a chondral lesion 1year after the surgery (median=2.30mm [IQR: 1.40; 3.00] versus 3.10mm [IQR: 2.50; 3.40]; p value=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a preoperative LFNS are three times more likely to have a chondral lesion in the notch region 1year after surgery. These chondral lesions are concomitant to the injury and do not progress over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Single-stage autologous cartilage repair results in positive patient-reported outcomes for chondral lesions of the knee: a systematic review

AIM

This article aims to perform a systematic review of the clinical literature regarding the efficacy of single-stage autologous cartilage repair.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were identified; however, due to overlapping patient cohorts, nine studies were included for data extraction and analysis. Six studies applied minced cartilage, while three studies utilized enzymatically processed cartilage. Two authorship groups described single-stage techniques that exclusively utilized cartilage from the debrided lesion rim, while the remaining groups either utilized healthy cartilage or combined healthy cartilage with cartilage debrided from lesion rim. Among the included techniques, scaffold augments were used in four studies, and three studies implemented bone autograft augmentation. When summarizing patient reported outcome measures for the included studies, single-stage autologous cartilage repair demonstrated an average improvement ranging from 18.7 ​± ​5.3 to 30.0 ​± ​8.0 amongst the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores subsections, 24.3 ​± ​10.5 for the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, and 41.0 ​± ​10.0 for Visual Analogue Scale-Pain.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage autologous cartilage repair is a promising technique with positive clinical data to date. The current study highlights the overall improvement in patient reported outcomes after repair for chondral defects to the knee with average follow-up ranging from 12 to 201 months and also the heterogeneity and variability of the single-stage surgical technique. Further discussion on the standardization of practices for a cost-effective single-stage augmented autologous cartilage technique is needed. In the future, a well-designed randomized controlled trial is needed to explore the efficacy of this therapeutic modality relative to established intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review; Level IV.

Acute, isolated and unstable syndesmotic injuries are frequently associated with intra-articular pathologies

PURPOSE

Although simultaneous arthroscopy for the surgical treatment of acute isolated, unstable syndesmotic injuries has been recommended, little knowledge is present about the actual frequency of intra-articular pathologies for this injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and severity of intra-articular pathologies detected during arthroscopy and their subsequent treatment in acute isolated, unstable syndesmotic injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients treated by arthroscopic-assisted stabilization for acute isolated, syndesmotic instability was performed. The primary outcome parameter was the frequency of intra-articular pathologies. Secondary outcome parameters were the type of syndesmotic lesion (ligamentous/bony), severity of chondral lesions, MRI findings, treatment details, complications and the identification of factors associated with intra-articular pathologies.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients, 19% female, with a mean age of 37 ± 12 years met the inclusion criteria. 70% suffered isolated ligamentous injuries, the remaining suffered avulsion fractures of the syndesmosis. Chondral lesions occurred in 48% (ICRS grade II: 33%; ICRS grade IV 15%) and intra-articular loose bodies in 11% of patients. Overall, arthroscopy revealed intra-articular pathologies necessitating further treatment in 19% of patients. Neither the type of syndesmotic injury (bony vs. ligamentous; ns) nor the degree of ligamentous instability (West Point IIB vs. III; ns) had a significant influence on the occurrence of chondral lesions. One complication (SSI) occurred. Pre-operative MRI revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 100/79% for chondral lesions and 50/93% for loose bodies.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular pathologies in acute isolated, unstable syndesmotic injuries occur in up to 50% of patients, 19% necessitated additional treatment. Simultaneous arthroscopy, independent of the pre-operative MRI findings, appears reasonable in highly active patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Correlation between the AMADEUS score and preoperative clinical patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in patients undergoing matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI)

BACKGROUND

Recently, the AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth Underlying Structures) grading system has been introduced to evaluate and grade osteochondral lesions prior to cartilage surgery. The AMADEUS score has not been connected to clinical data in order to test a potential clincial impact.

PURPOSE

To examine the correlation between the AMADEUS score and preoperative patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series METHODS: Patients treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) were included in the study, unless exclusion criteria like BMI > 35, prior extensive meniscectomy or ongoing inflammatory arthritis were present. Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were graded according to the standardized AMADEUS protocol. The final AMADEUS score was correlated with preoperative patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), the Lysholm score, the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) score, and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) score.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 33.6 ± 11.5 years, a mean BMI of 25.1 ± 4.9, and a mean defect size of 2.3 ± 1.5 cm² were included in the study. More severe cartilage defects, indicated by the AMADEUS grade (R = 0.35, p = 0.01) and the AMADEUS score (R = - 0.36, p = 0.01) as well as larger chondral defects (R = 0.32, p = 0.03) show a moderate correlation with the higher COMI scores. No correlative capacity was demonstrated for the AMADEUS score and the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores as well as for its subscales.

CONCLUSION

There is a moderate correlation of the COMI and the AMADEUS score in patients treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). All other patient-reported outcome measurement scores (PROMs) show no evidence of an association to the magnetic resonance-based AMADEUS score.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The clinical and scientific implication of the COMI score as a PROM tool can be recommended when working with the AMADEUS score and patients undergoing MACI.

[Labral pathologies of the hip joint]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip joint is performed for the diagnostics of many clinical pathologies. For clarification of pathologies of the hip joint conventional MRI and MR arthrography are used. The use of MRI either with or without the intravenous administration of contrast material is performed to diagnose bone marrow lesions, necrosis of the femoral head, inflammatory and tumorous lesions affecting the hip joint and its components. After the intra-articular administration of a diluted solution of contrast material, which results in distension of the joint, MR arthrography is performed for the diagnosis of intra-articular pathologies, such as lesions of the labrum acetabulare, chondral lesions and free intra-articular bodies. In recent times, MR arthrography is carried out with continuous traction of the limb to be examined because this leads to a distension of the joint and its components and in this way particularly lesions of the labrum with involvement of cartilage can be visualized even better. This article gives an overview of MRI and the accuracy of detecting lesions of the labrum acetabulare and the influence on the therapeutic approach.

Long-term follow-up evaluation of autologous chondrocyte implantation for symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee: A single-centre prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) has been the first technique in reconstruction of a valid articular surface. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results of this technique at an average follow up of 162±27months (range 88-208) in a group of patients who underwent ACI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

32 patients were operated between 1997 and 2007 for chondral lesions or osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Mean size of the defect was 5.48cm²±1.53 (range 2-9). Nine patients were treated with I generation technique and 23 with II generation. All patients were evaluated with Subjective IKDC and Tegner Activity Scales for clinical outcomes and with EQ-VAS for a quantitative measure of health after intervention, starting from pre-operative period and at regular follow up (minimum 88 months-maximum 208 months).

RESULTS

A significant increment of all scores was noticed comparing preoperative and postoperative results. In particular medium IKDC score increased from 40.3±9.6 in preoperative evaluation to 74.2±11.6 at one year (p<0.00001) and to 83.9±10.4 at 5 years follow up (p<0.001). Mean IKDC values at the last follow-up were 80.3±14.2, showing no statistical differences with those obtained at five-year follow-up. Tegner Activity Scale values increased from 2.8±1.1 preoperatively to 4.1±1.1 (p<0.0001) after one year and to 6±1.1 at five years (p<0.0001). Mean Tegner Activity Scale values decreased to 4.8±1.4 at the last follow-up. EQ-VAS evaluation showed superposable results comparing the 5 years evaluation with the ones at a medium follow up of 162±27months.

DISCUSSION

The most important finding is the reliability at long-term of ACI technique, which in our series gave excellent clinical results. No statistical differences were observed between first- and second-generation. Clinical outcomes were significantly better for defects in the femoral condyles, influenced by age (worse results over 30 years old).

CONCLUSIONS

ACI represents a valid technique for chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee in a population heterogeneous for age, sex and activity level with good results even at a long term follow up.

The relevance of the radiological signs of acetabular retroversion among patients with femoroacetabular impingement

Orthopaedic surgeons have accepted various radiological signs to be representative of acetabular retroversion, which is the main characteristic of focal over-coverage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Using a validated method for radiological analysis, we assessed the relevance of these signs to predict intra-articular lesions in 93 patients undergoing surgery for FAI. A logistic regression model to predict chondral damage showed that an acetabular retroversion index (ARI) > 20%, a derivative of the well-known cross-over sign, was an independent predictor (p = 0.036). However, ARI was less significant than the Tönnis classification (p = 0.019) and age (p = 0.031) in the same model. ARI was unable to discriminate between grades of chondral lesions, while the type of cam lesion (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.047) were able to. Other widely recognised signs of acetabular retroversion, such as the ischial spine sign, the posterior wall sign or the cross-over sign were irrelevant according to our analysis. Regardless of its secondary predictive role, an ARI > 20% appears to be the most clinically relevant radiological sign of acetabular retroversion in symptomatic patients with FAI.