Antiepileptic drugs. A review of clinically significant drug interactions

An evaluation of antiepileptic drug therapy in nursing facilities

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prescribing and use of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in nursing facility residents.

DESIGN

A retrospective, multicenter drug use evaluation.

SETTING

A total of 85 nursing facilities (average size, 119 beds) in five states.

PARTICIPANTS

1132 residents of the total 10,168 residents screened were prescribed at least one AED.

MEASURES

Demographic information, primary indication for AED, comorbid conditions, prescribing physician's specialty, concomitant medications, and AED dosage regimen information were collected. Laboratory tests obtained in the most recent 6 months and seizure occurrence and seizure-related diagnostic assessments made in the most recent 3 months were also recorded.

RESULTS

Of 1132 residents receiving AED therapy, 892 (78.8%) were prescribed AED therapy for a seizure-related diagnosis although 86% of seizure types were unspecified. Another 215 residents (19.0%) were prescribed AEDs for nonseizure diagnoses, and 25 (2.2%) had no indication for AED therapy. AEDs most frequently prescribed were phenytoin (56.8%), carbamazepine (23.0%), phenobarbital (15.6%), and valproic acid (13.1%). For residents with a seizure diagnosis, the most frequently prescribed monotherapy agents were phenytoin (52.0%), carbamazepine (12.2%), and phenobarbitol (7.1%). Almost 25% of residents with a seizure diagnosis took a combination of AEDs; more than 50% of all combinations included phenobarbital. About 9% of residents with a seizure diagnosis had one or more documented seizures during a 3-month review period.

CONCLUSION

Among the substantial percentage of residents treated with AEDs, the lack of diagnosis of seizure type has serious implications for the choice of AED therapy. Opportunities exist for prescribing physicians, consultant pharmacists, and nursing staff to improve the medical management of nursing facility residents with seizures and of others receiving AEDs.

Management of drug interactions in patients with HIV

OBJECTIVE

To provide a complication of relevant information on drug interactions to assist healthcare practitioners in managing complex HIV-related pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Information was retrieved via a MEDLINE search (January 1966-December 1996) using MeSH headings "human immunodeficiency virus," "drug interactions," and names of medications commonly prescribed for the management of HIV infection and related opportunistic infections. Abstracts of international and national conferences, review articles, textbooks, and references of all articles were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All literature on pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions was considered for inclusion. Pertinent information, as assessed by the authors, was selected and summarized for discussion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug disposition and/or pharmacologic effect may be affected either by HIV-related physiologic changes or by the presence of concomitant drug therapy. Modifications in drug selection, dosage, dosing regimen, or route of administration may be needed to avoid or manage drug-disease, drug-drug, or drug-food interactions. Management options may depend on the mechanism and the clinical significance of the interaction, the availability of therapeutic alternatives, patient convenience, and cost restrictions. In the absence of specific data, consideration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics to assist practitioners in predicting the likelihood of possible interactions was included.

RESULTS

A comprehensive table of clinically significant drug interactions is provided. Drug interaction principles and practical management strategies are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for drug interactions is extremely common, given the increasing complexity of managing patients infected with HIV. To avoid compromising therapeutic efficacy or increasing drug toxicity, practitioners need to be aware of potential interactions and are encouraged to use a systematic approach when managing patient drug therapy.

Oral antifungal drug interactions

The recent approval of itraconazole and terbafine for the treatment of onychomycosis has launched a new era in the therapeutic management of this previously resistant form of dermatomycoses. These agents represent safe and effective treatments. The clinician should, however, become knowledgeable with the potential drug interactions that are discussed in this article.

Established antiepileptic drugs

Despite the recent entry into the market-place of a range of new pharmacological treatments for epilepsy, most patients still receive the standard antiepileptic drugs. This review considers the clinical place and practical use of these agents. Detailed consideration is given to carbamazepine, phenytoin, sodium valproate, phenobarbital and ethosuximide, with lesser emphasis on primidone, clobazam and clonazepam. Individualization of therapy, polypharmacy, refractory epilepsy, therapeutic drug monitoring, pregnancy, withdrawing treatment, epilepsy prophylaxis and referral to an epilepsy centre are also discussed. The paper concludes with a statement of 12 basic rules in prescribing established antiepileptic drugs.

The anticonvulsant lamotrigine in treatment-resistant manic-depressive illness

Anticonvulsants are used extensively in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Treating depression in bipolar disorder can be difficult because of the limited antidepressant effects of the standard mood stabilizers and the tendency of antidepressants to induce mania or decrease cycle length. Lamotrigine is a new anticonvulsant with few side effects that may have mood-stabilizing and elevating effects. Its mechanism of action probably involves the inhibition of excessive release of excitatory amino acids such as glutamate. Antiglutamatergic agents may be antidepressant and mood stabilizing. A case series of 16 patients treated with lamotrigine (dose range 50 mg to 250 mg, mean dose of responders = 141 mg) is presented along with two case reports. All patients were considered treatment-resistant bipolar type I or II. Patients were rated on average 5 weeks after starting lamotrigine using a semistructured follow-up form that included symptom rating, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. Eight of 16 patients were rated as "responders" (CGI < or = 2) and had a mean increase of 16 in their GAF scores. Lamotrigine seems to have antidepressant and mood-stabilizing effects, but this requires confirmation in randomized, controlled trials.

Interactions of clobazam with conventional antiepileptics in children

Clobazam is a 1,5-benzodiazepine effective in antiepileptic therapy of children and adults. Presently it is mainly used as adjuvant therapy for intractable seizures. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of clobazam on the apparent clearance of other antiepileptic drugs at steady state, and to determine the factors that determine the plasma levels of clobazam and its active metabolite N-desmethylclobazam. Patients were 74 children with intractable seizures who received treatment with clobazam at our institution as part of the Canadian Cooperative Clobazam Study Group during the years 1987 to 1991. Serum concentrations of clobazam, N-desmethylclobazam, and of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were monitored and prospectively collected. The effect of clobazam treatment on the apparent clearance steady state of the other antiepileptic drugs was determined by statistical comparison of the clearances of each drug before and after initiation of clobazam treatment using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. The effects of dosage, age, and concomitant antiepileptic therapy on the levels of clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam was assessed by multivariate analysis. Response to treatment and incidence of adverse effects were evaluated for each conventional antiepileptic drug to possibly identify favorable or unfavorable combinations with clobazam. Whereas the clearances of most conventional antiepileptics are not affected by cotherapy with clobazam, the apparent clearances of valproic acid and primidone are significantly reduced in the presence of clobazam. Serum concentrations of clobazam increased with dosage and age, and decreased with phenobarbital cotherapy. Serum concentrations of N-desmethylclobazam significantly correlated with clobazam serum levels, age, or clobazam dosage and were significantly increased by cotherapy with phenytoin or carbamazepine. None of the concomitantly used drugs were associated with increased or decreased rate of seizure control. Twelve patients experienced mild adverse drug effects that were not associated with particular cotherapy, clobazam dose, or plasma concentrations. When clobazam is added to a therapy regimen that includes valproic acid, the patient should be closely followed for possible adverse drug reactions caused by elevated valproic acid serum concentrations, and monitoring of valproate serum levels should be considered. When clobazam doses are gradually increased to achieve an optimal clinical effect, the interactions with phenobarbital, carbamazepine, and phenytoin do not necessitate therapeutic drug monitoring of clobazam or N-desmethylclobazam, because there is a large therapeutic window and a poor correlation between plasma concentrations and therapeutic efficacy.

Overview of the safety of newer antiepileptic drugs

Standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are associated with a wide variety of acute and chronic adverse events and with many interactions with each other and with non-AEDs that complicate patient management. The safety and interaction profiles of the newer AEDs have also been intensively studied. Safety data are available for six of the newer AEDs, lamotrigine (LTG), vigabatrin (VGB), gabapentin (GBP), tiagabine (TGB), felbamate (FBM), and topiramate (TPM). The potential for the most recently developed AEDs for producing rare idiosyncratic reactions cannot be ascertained until additional patient exposures have been reported from careful postmarketing surveillance.

Influence of polymorphic N-acetyltransferase phenotype on the inhibition and induction of acetaminophen bioactivation with long-term isoniazid

OBJECTIVE

To determine in patients receiving isoniazid prophylaxis whether an increase in the CYP2E1 dependent formation clearance of acetaminophen (paracetamol) to N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI) occurs during a normal 24-hour isoniazid dose interval and whether the interaction is dependent on acetylation status.

METHODS

Acetaminophen elimination kinetics were determined on four different occasions. Ten subjects were assigned to receive acetaminophen either simultaneously with the 8 am dose of isoniazid or 12 hours after the isoniazid dose. One week later, on the last day of isoniazid therapy, subjects received acetaminophen at the alternate time of day. The control phase acetaminophen administrations were repeated 1 and 2 weeks later, following the initial randomization. Isoniazid acetylation (NAT2) genotype was determined by analysis of genomic DNA obtained from peripheral blood leukocytes.

RESULTS

The mean NAPQI formation clearance was inhibited 57% when acetaminophen and isoniazid were coadministered but was unchanged compared with time-matched control when acetaminophen was given 12 hours after the isoniazid dose. However, when data from subjects was segregated according to isoniazid (INH) acetylation phenotype, the mean ratio of NAPQI formation clearances (+INH/-INH) with 8 PM acetaminophen was significantly higher for fast acetylators compared with slow acetylators (1.36 versus 0.68; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Fast metabolizers of isoniazid appeared to clear the inducer or inhibitor from the active site of CYP2E1 more rapidly, which resulted in an increased formation of NAPQI 12 hours after the isoniazid dose. In contrast, formation of NAPQI for slow isoniazid metabolizers remained inhibited.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of the new antiepileptic drugs

Therapy with traditional antiepileptic drugs is associated with a wide range of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. In particular, enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition and displacement from protein binding may result in important changes in serum concentrations of antiepileptics. Relevant interactions have also been described for some new antiepileptics. Felbamate increases serum concentrations of phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproic acid (sodium valproate). On the other hand, it reduces concentrations of carbamazepine and increases concentrations of its metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Concentrations of felbamate itself are reduced by phenytoin and carbamazepine. Concentrations of lamotrigine are considerably increased by valproic acid and decreased by phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital (phenobarbitone). Vigabatrin reduces serum concentrations of phenytoin by approximately 20%. On the other hand, some new antiepileptics have the important advantage of not interfering with the metabolism of other antiepileptics; this is the case for gabapentin, lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin, oxcarbazepine and vigabatrin are independent of concomitant drugs. These aspects are especially important as, until now, new antiepileptics have been most often utilised as add-on therapy.

A clinical and pharmacokinetic case study of an interaction of levodopa and antituberculous therapy in Parkinson's disease

We studied the relationship between levodopa response and antituberculous treatment in a patient with idiopathic Parkinson's disease whose parkinsonism deteriorated when treatment with rifampicin and isoniazid (Rifinah) for pulmonary tuberculosis was started. A levodopa challenge test with regular recording of motor function was performed during, and again after stopping, antituberculous treatment. Plasma levodopa and levodopa metabolite pharmacokinetic profiles were determined using standard techniques. "On" period duration was 75% longer after antituberculous treatment had been stopped. These clinical findings correlated with a 37% increase in area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC), a 103% increase in apparent elimination half-life (t1/2), a 41% increase in time to maximum concentration (Tmax), and a 33% decrease in maximum concentration (Cmax) of levodopa. A concurrent increase in plasma 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) and a decrease in plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), the three major metabolites of levodopa, suggests an inhibition of the enzyme dopa decarboxylase, probably by isoniazid.

Automated analysis of free and total concentrations of three antiepileptic drugs in plasma with on-line dialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography

A fully automated method for determination of the free and total concentration of drugs with a varying degree of protein binding is described. The antiepileptic drugs phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone were chosen to demonstrate the utility of this technique. The method was based on the ASTED system and combined on-line equilibrium dialysis at 37 degrees C with concentration of the dialysate on a trace enrichment column and HPLC determination with UV detection. The dialysis cell was a modification of the ASTED dialysis cell and 22% of the free concentration of the drugs were recovered in the recipient channel of the dialyser after 10 min of dialysis at 37 degrees C. The free concentration, the total concentration as well as the drugs protein binding could be determined. The method was shown to be well suited for routine monitoring of the free and the total concentrations of the drugs in plasma from epileptic patients.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs

We have reviewed the pharmacokinetics of six antiepileptic drugs that are marketed (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, and zonisamide) and six drugs that are undergoing evaluation (levetiracetam, ralitoline, remacemide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and topiramate). In addition, we have compared the prodrugs eterobarb and fosphenytoin and the controlled-release formulations of valproic acid and carbamazepine with their parent compounds. Finally, we have devised a scoring system to compare the pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs. Using this system, vigabatrin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and topiramate appea to have the most favourable pharmacokinetic profiles, whilst ralitoline and stiripentol have the least favourable.

Newer antiepileptic drugs. Towards an improved risk-benefit ratio

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. Drugs for the treatment of partial seizures are particularly needed. With major advances in our understanding of the basic neuropathology, neuropharmacology and neurophysiology of epilepsy, numerous candidate novel antiepileptic drugs have been developed in recent years. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of 12 new antiepileptic drugs namely vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, eterobarb, zonisamide, remacemide, stiripentol, topiramate and levetiracetam (ucb-L059). Of the 12 drugs, vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin have recently been marketed in the UK. Five of these new drugs have known mechanisms of action (vigabatrin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine and eterobarb), which may provide for a more rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine, remacemide and eterobarb are prodrugs. Vigabatrin, gabapentin and topiramate are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic characteristics in that they are excreted mainly unchanged in urine and not susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. In contrast, lamotrigine, felbamate and stiripentol exhibit significant drug interactions. Essentially, all the drugs are effective in partial or secondarily generalised seizures and are effective to varying degrees in other seizure types. Particularly welcome is the possible effectiveness of zonisamide in myoclonus and felbamate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In relation to adverse effects, CNS effects are observed with all drugs, however, gabapentin, remacemide and levetiracetam appear to exhibit least. There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs which do become licensed are an advance in that they are effective and/or are associated with less adverse effects than currently available antiepileptic drugs in these patients, it is possible that these drugs may exhibit even more improved risk-benefit ratios when used in normal clinical practice.