The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence

Health system costs for stage-specific breast cancer: a population-based approach

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present analysis was to determine the publicly funded health care costs associated with the care of breast cancer (bca) patients by disease stage.

METHODS

Incident cases of female invasive bca (2005-2009) were extracted from the Ontario Cancer Registry and linked to administrative datasets from the publicly funded system. The type and use of health care services were stratified by disease stage over the first 2 years after diagnosis. Mean costs and costs by type of clinical resource used in the care of bca patients were compared with costs for a matched control group. The attributable cost for the 2-year time horizon was determined in 2008 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

This cohort study involved 39,655 patients with bca and 190,520 control subjects. The average age in those groups was 61.1 and 60.9 years respectively. Most bca patients were classified as either stage i (34.4%) or stage ii (31.8%). Of the bca cohort, 8% died within the first 2 years after diagnosis. The overall mean cost per bca case from a public payer perspective in the first 2 years after diagnosis was $41,686. Over the 2-year time horizon, the mean cost increased by stage: i, $29,938; ii, $46,893; iii, $65,369; and iv, $66,627. The attributable cost of bca was $31,732. Cost drivers were cancer clinic visits, physician billings, and hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Costs of care increased by stage of bca. Cost drivers were cancer clinic visits, physician billings, and hospitalizations. These data will assist planning and decision-making for the use of limited health care resources.

Aligning Cost Assessment With Community-Based Participatory Research

The few existing economic evaluations of community-based health promotion interventions were reported retrospectively at the end of the trial. We report an evaluation of the costs of the Kin KeeperSM Cancer Prevention Intervention, a female family-focused educational intervention for underserved women applied to increase breast and cervical cancer screening by enhancing cancer literacy. The cost analysis was performed from the perspective of a health organization with established community partnerships adding the Kin Keeper family intervention in the future to an existing community health worker program. The cost of delivering the Kin Keeper intervention, including two cancer education home visits, was $151/family. Kin Keeper is an inexpensive educational intervention delivered by community health workers to promote breast and cervical screening, with strong fidelity and quality. Prospecting cost evaluations of community-based interventions are needed for making informed timely decisions on the adaptation and expansion of such programs.

Investigation of adverse-event-related costs for patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Existing treatments for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are often effective but can cause adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to identify AEs associated with chemotherapies commonly used in mBC treatment (phase 1) and to quantify the economic impact of these AEs (phase 2).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients in phase 1 had at least one claim for therapy for mBC, with at least one episode with single or multiple agents. The most common chemotherapy-related complications were identified using medical and pharmacy claims data. In phase 2, patients meeting study criteria were divided into four treatment cohorts by the line of treatment and chemotherapy received: first-line taxane-treated patients, second-line taxane-treated patients, first-line capecitabine-treated patients, and second-line capecitabine-treated patients. Average monthly AE-related health care costs per cohort were stratified by cost component. Total monthly costs per number of AEs were also calculated.

RESULTS

On average, patients in phase 1 (n = 1,551) had 2 episodes of treatment, with a mean duration of 131 days. The most frequently noted complications were anemia (50.7% of mBC treatment episodes), bilirubin elevation (26.4%), and leukopenia (24.8%). In phase 2, costs related to AEs were primarily driven by incremental inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs. Increases in average monthly costs ranged from $854 (9.0%) to $5,320 (69.5%), according to cohort. Overall costs increased with increasing numbers of AEs.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy-related AEs in patients with mBC are associated with a substantial economic burden that increases with the number of AEs reported.

Relevance of health economics in breast cancer treatment: integration of economics in the management of breast cancer at the clinic level

Since the introduction of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system with cost-related and entity-specific flat-rate reimbursements for all in-patients in 2004 in Germany, economics have become an important focus in medical care, including breast centers. Since then, physicians and hospitals have had to gradually take on more and more financial responsibilities for their medical care to avoid losses for their institutions. Due to financial limitations of resources, most medical services have to be adjusted to correlating revenues, which results in the development of a variety of active measures to understand, steer, and optimize costs, resources and related processes for breast cancer treatment. In this review, the challenging task to implement microeconomic management at the clinic level for breast cancer treatment is analyzed from breast cancer-specific publications. The newly developed economic management perspective is identified for different stakeholders in the healthcare system, and successful microeconomic projects and future aspects are described.

Treatment practices, outcomes, and costs of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, United States, 2005-2007

To describe factors associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR), including extensively-drug-resistant (XDR), tuberculosis (TB) in the United States, we abstracted inpatient, laboratory, and public health clinic records of a sample of MDR TB patients reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from California, New York City, and Texas during 2005-2007. At initial diagnosis, MDR TB was detected in 94% of 130 MDR TB patients and XDR TB in 80% of 5 XDR TB patients. Mutually exclusive resistance was 4% XDR, 17% pre-XDR, 24% total first-line resistance, 43% isoniazid/rifampin/rifabutin-plus-other resistance, and 13% isoniazid/rifampin/rifabutin-only resistance. Nearly three-quarters of patients were hospitalized, 78% completed treatment, and 9% died during treatment. Direct costs, mostly covered by the public sector, averaged $134,000 per MDR TB and $430,000 per XDR TB patient; in comparison, estimated cost per non-MDR TB patient is $17,000. Drug resistance was extensive, care was complex, treatment completion rates were high, and treatment was expensive.

What does breast cancer treatment cost and what is it worth?

The costs of breast cancer care are substantial and growing, and they extend across the spectrum of care. Medical therapies and hospitalizations account for a significant proportion of these costs. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is the preferred method for assessing the health benefits of medical interventions relative to their costs. Although many CEAs have been conducted for a wide range of breast cancer treatments, these analyses are not used routinely to guide coverage or utilization decisions in the United States. Currently, patients and providers may not consider costs when making most treatment decisions; this is likely to change as payment reform spreads.

Indirect costs associated with metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the indirect costs of productivity loss between metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and early stage breast cancer (EBC) patients, as well as their respective family members.

METHODS

The MarketScan Health and Productivity Management database (2005-2009) was used. Adult BC patients eligible for employee benefits of sick leave and/or short-term disability were identified with ICD-9 codes. Difference in sick leave and short-term disability days was calculated between MBC patients and their propensity score matched EBC cohort and general population (controls) during a 12-month follow-up period. Generalized linear models were used to examine the impact of MBC on indirect costs to patients and their families.

RESULTS

A total of 139 MBC, 432 EBC, and 820 controls were eligible for sick leave and 432 MBC, 1552 EBC, and 4682 controls were eligible for short-term disability (not mutually exclusive). After matching, no statistical difference was found in sick leave days and the associated costs between MBC and EBC cohorts. However, MBC patients had significantly higher short-term disability costs than EBC patients and controls (MBC: $6166 ± $9194 vs. EBC: $3690 ± $6673 vs.

CONTROLS

$558 ± $2487, both p < 0.001). MBC patients had more sick leave cost than controls ($2383 ± $5539 vs. $1282 ± $2083, p < 0.05). Controlling for covariates, MBC patients incurred 47% more short-term disability costs vs EBC patients (p = 0.009). Older patients (p = 0.002), non-HMO payers (p < 0.05), or patients not receiving chemotherapy during follow-up (p < 0.001) were associated with lower short-term disability costs. MBC patients' families incurred 39.7% (p = 0.06) higher indirect costs compared to EBC patients' families after controlling for key covariates.

CONCLUSION

Productivity loss and associated costs in MBC patients are substantially higher than EBC patients or the general population. These findings underscore the economic burden of MBC from a US societal perspective. Various treatment regimens should be evaluated to identify opportunities to reduce the disease burden from the societal perspective.

Therapy choices and quality of life in young breast cancer survivors: a short-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Premenopausal women represent approximately 35% of new breast cancer diagnoses. Diagnosis and treatment may lead to substantial disruption in quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Premenopausal patients (aged 18 to 50 years) treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer completed a mailed questionnaire. Multiple self-reported QOL measures and clinical data were collected. Cluster analysis and Cronbach's α were used to validate the survey. Analysis of variance was performed for specific interventions. Lower interference scores conveyed higher QOL.

RESULTS

The response rate was 49.8%. Cronbach's α was 0.96. Immediate contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) carried the highest interference (mean, 3.3148) with sexuality compared with no CPM (mean, 2.85) or delayed CPM (P = .03). Breast conservation had the least interference with appearance (P < .01) and work and finances (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic mastectomy and CPM with or without reconstruction may adversely affect QOL. These findings suggest that the choice and timing of interventions may significantly affect patient satisfaction.

Ultrasound-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer is cost-saving: results of a cost-benefit analysis

Ultrasound-guided surgery (USS) has recently been proven to result in a significant reduction of tumour-involved surgical margins, for patients with palpable invasive breast cancer. The objective of this economic evaluation alongside a randomised trial was to evaluate the costs and benefits of USS compared to palpation-guided surgery (PGS). The hospital perspective was used. On the cost side of the analysis, resource use related to baseline treatment was taken into account and on the benefit side, resource use related to additional treatments was included. On the cost side, the difference in costs per patient was €193 (95% CI €153-€233) with higher costs in the USS group. On the benefit side, the difference in costs per patient was -€349 (95% CI -€591 to -€103) with higher costs in the PGS group. This resulted in a cost decrease of -€154 (95% CI -€388 to €81) in the USS group compared to the PGS group. Intra-operative use of a US system during BCS reduces the rate of tumour-involved margins and thereby the costs of additional treatments.

Oncoplastic approach in the conservative treatment of breast cancer: analysis of costs

PURPOSE

To analyze the direct costs of conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer, performed in a university hospital, to the Brazilian National Health Care Public System (SUS), checking the impact of the oncoplastic approach on these costs.

METHODS

One hundred thirty eight breast cancer patients who had undergone conservative treatment with oncoplastic approach (n=36) or not (control group, n=102), in the period from 2005 to 2010, were enrolled. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded. The direct costs of the surgical procedure were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

Groups did not differ in regard to age (p=0.963), and patients in oncoplastic group had a longer time of hospital stay (p=0.000). The median direct cost for the oncoplastic group was R$461.00 and for the control group was R$229.00 (p=0.000).

CONCLUSION

The oncoplastic approach has generated higher direct costs in conservative surgical treatment of breast cancer to SUS.

The economic burden of metastatic breast cancer: a U.S. managed care perspective

This study was performed to quantify the economic burden and identify drivers of direct costs of mBC. In a retrospective study of a de-identified administrative claims database of privately insured patients, women between 18 and 64 years of age were included if they had at least one claim with a diagnosis of breast cancer and subsequently one or more claims with a diagnosis of secondary malignancy between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2009. The study sample was further classified into the following subgroups: (1) Endocrine therapy, (2) HER-2 targeted therapy, (3) Concomitant HER-2 targeted and endocrine therapy, (4) Cytotoxic chemotherapy, and (5) No-systemic therapy. Costs for medical resource utilization were calculated on a per patient per month (PPPM) basis. A total of 7,698 mBC patients were identified from 2003 to 2009 with an average age at index of ~52 years, and average follow up of 2.2 years. The average total direct medical costs for 7,698 mBC patients were $9,788 PPPM. Outpatient costs accounted for the majority of overall PPPM costs. Examining the five different mBC therapeutic subgroups revealed that patients who received no-systemic therapy had the highest costs at $13,926 PPPM, while patients who received systemic endocrine therapy had the lowest costs at $5,303 PPPM. This study demonstrated that mBC is associated with substantial healthcare costs in a non-Medicare patient population. Assuming average PPPM costs of $9,788 and an average life expectancy of 2.2 years, the total average expenditure to treat mBC would be ~$250,000 per patient.

Medical care costs and survival associated with hepatocellular carcinoma among the elderly

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We assessed the burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in terms of mortality and medical care costs, based on analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the SEER-Medicare database on patients 66 years or older who were diagnosed with primary HCC from 1991 to 2007, entitled for Medicare Parts A and B, and not enrolled in health maintenance organizations (n = 5712). Controls were individuals without HCC, identified from a 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries residing in SEER areas; they were matched 1:1 with individuals with HCC (cases) for age, sex, race, and geographic region (average age, 75 y; 34.7% female). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival distributions. Costs were reported in 2009 dollars; per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs were compared between cases and controls using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

The largest proportion of cases had localized disease (38.2%), followed by regional (24.0%), unstaged (20.4%), and distant (17.3%) disease. The median survival times were 5 months for cases and 60 months for controls; they were 3 months for patients with distant disease, 4 months for patients with regional disease, and 9 months for those with localized disease. The mean PPPM costs were $7863 for cases and $1243 for controls (P < .001). These costs were primarily driven by inpatient (mean, $5439 vs $682 without HCC; P < .001) and hospice (mean $554 vs $42 without HCC; P < .001) care. Mean PPPM costs by stage were $7265 for localized disease, $8072 for regional disease, and $9585 for distant disease (P < .001 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on analysis of the SEER-Medicare database, costs for patients with HCC are approximately 6- to 8-fold higher than for those without this cancer. Patients with distant HCC had the greatest costs. These findings highlight that HCC is a substantial medical cost burden for elderly patients.

Acute skin toxicity-related, out-of-pocket expenses in patients with breast cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy: a descriptive, exploratory study

PURPOSE

Acute skin toxicity is one of the most common side effects of breast cancer radiotherapy. To date, no one has estimated the nonmedical out-of-pocket expenses associated with this side effect. The primary aim of the present descriptive, exploratory study was to assess the feasibility of a newly developed skin toxicity costs questionnaire. The secondary aims were to: (1) estimate nonmedical out-of-pocket costs, (2) examine the nature of the costs, (3) explore potential background predictors of costs, and (4) explore the relationship between patient-reported dermatologic quality of life and expenditures.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients (mean age = 54.88, Stage 0-III) undergoing external beam radiotherapy completed a demographics/medical history questionnaire as well as a seven-item Skin Toxicity Costs (STC) questionnaire and the Skindex-16 in week 5 of treatment.

RESULTS

Mean skin toxicity costs were $131.64 (standard error [SE] = $23.68). Most frequently incurred expenditures were new undergarments and products to manage toxicity. Education was a significant unique predictor of spending, with more educated women spending more money. Greater functioning impairment was associated with greater costs. The STC proved to be a practical, brief measure which successfully indicated specific areas of patient expenditures and need.

CONCLUSIONS

Results reveal the nonmedical, out-of-pocket costs associated with acute skin toxicity in the context of breast cancer radiotherapy. To our knowledge, this study is the first to quantify individual costs associated with this treatment side effect, as well as the first to present a scale specifically designed to assess such costs.

RELEVANCE

In future research, the STC could be used as an outcome variable in skin toxicity prevention and control research, as a behavioral indicator of symptom burden, or as part of a needs assessment.

INCIDENCE-BASED COST-OF-ILLNESS MODEL FOR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES

Objectives: This study aims to estimate the annual U.S. societal costs associated with treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients using an incidence-based cost-of-illness (COI) framework.

Methods: An incidence-based COI model was constructed in which MBC patients were simulated from diagnosis through active treatment, palliative care, and death over 5 years. Key model parameters included: annual incidence of breast cancer in the metastatic stage, utilization of cancer therapies and other medical care resources, treatment-related adverse events, unit costs, work days missed by patient and caregiver, and wage rates. Overall survival was based on SEER data and costs were assigned to living patients monthly, according to their disease management phase. The outcomes measures were total discounted societal costs, cost/year, and cost/patient-year.

Results: The annual incidence of MBC in the United States in 2007 was estimated to be 49,674 patients (de novo and progressed from earlier stages). The total discounted cost to society attributable to MBC was $12.2 billion for the incident cohort, or $98,571 per patient-year. The 5-year direct medical cost of this incident cohort was $9.3 billion, or $75,415 per patient-year. Treatment-related costs (active treatment, toxicity management, and medical follow-up) contributed 44 percent of MBC expenditure, followed by palliative/best supportive care costs (31 percent). Lost productivity accounted for approximately 21 percent of the total cost ($2.6 billion over 5 years or $21,153 per patient-year).

Conclusions: The societal burden of MBC in the United States is substantial. Earlier detection and effective treatment could lead to a significant decrease in costs while improving overall disease prognosis.

Healthcare cost attributable to recently-diagnosed breast cancer in a privately-insured population in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate breast cancer-associated healthcare cost from the payer perspective for the initial year after diagnoses of invasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the second most common malignancy in American women. While lifetime burden-of-care studies have reported spending between $20,000 and $100,000 per patient, previous studies have not outlined first year cost in managing this disease in recently diagnosed patients.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, matched cohort study of privately-insured patients. Data were from a large US employers' health claims database (January 2003-September 2008). Breast cancer cases were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes on index and confirmatory claims. A control group was identified with a ratio of 3:1, matched by demographic and health plan characteristics. Comorbidities were analyzed using the Charlson comorbidity index and AHRQ Comorbidity Software. A multivariate, log-linked, generalized linear model evaluated cost contributions of breast cancer in relation to demographic factors, comorbidities, and plan type.

RESULTS

The study included 35,057 cases and 105,171 matched controls (mean age 52 years). Common comorbidities included hypertension, diabetes, hypothyroidism, chronic pulmonary disease, and deficiency anemia. In the generalized linear model, the adjusted difference in total healthcare cost was $42,401 per patient within a year, with outpatient services responsible for most of this sum. Breast cancer-associated incremental annual costs per patient in inpatient, outpatient, and prescription categories were $5100, $37,231, and $1037, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

These results may not be representative of the entire US, as data were derived from breast cancer patients with private, employer-based health insurance, and lacked covariates including race/ethnicity, education, income, and disease stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently diagnosed breast cancer represents a substantial economic burden for US healthcare payers.

Healthcare costs in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy as their principal treatment modality

Background

The economic costs of treating patients with metastatic breast cancer have been examined in several studies, but available estimates of economic burden are at least a decade old. In this study, we characterize healthcare utilization and costs in the US among women with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy as their principal treatment modality.

Methods

Using a large private health insurance claims database (2000-2006), we identified all women initiating chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer with no evidence of receipt of concomitant or subsequent hormonal therapy, or receipt of trastuzumab at anytime. Healthcare utilization and costs (inpatient, outpatient, medication) were estimated on a cumulative basis from date of chemotherapy initiation ("index date") to date of disenrollment from the health plan or the end of the study period, whichever occurred first. Study measures were cumulated over time using the Kaplan-Meier Sample Average (KMSA) method; 95% CIs were generated using nonparametric bootstrapping. Findings also were examined among the subgroup of patients with uncensored data.

Results

The study population consisted of 1444 women; mean (SD) age was 59.1 (12.1) years. Over a mean follow-up of 532 days (range: 3 to 2412), study subjects averaged 1.7 hospital admissions, 10.7 inpatient days, and 83.6 physician office and hospital outpatient visits. Mean (95% CI) cumulative total healthcare costs were $128,556 ($118,409, $137,644) per patient. Outpatient services accounted for 29% of total costs, followed by medication other than chemotherapy (26%), chemotherapy (25%), and inpatient care (20%).

Conclusions

Healthcare costs-especially in the outpatient setting--are substantial among women with metastatic breast cancer for whom treatment options other than chemotherapy are limited.

Cost-effectiveness of early detection of breast cancer in Catalonia (Spain)

Background

Breast cancer (BC) causes more deaths than any other cancer among women in Catalonia. Early detection has contributed to the observed decline in BC mortality. However, there is debate on the optimal screening strategy. We performed an economic evaluation of 20 screening strategies taking into account the cost over time of screening and subsequent medical costs, including diagnostic confirmation, initial treatment, follow-up and advanced care.

Methods

We used a probabilistic model to estimate the effect and costs over time of each scenario. The effect was measured as years of life (YL), quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and lives extended (LE). Costs of screening and treatment were obtained from the Early Detection Program and hospital databases of the IMAS-Hospital del Mar in Barcelona. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to compare the relative costs and outcomes of different scenarios.

Results

Strategies that start at ages 40 or 45 and end at 69 predominate when the effect is measured as YL or QALYs. Biennial strategies 50-69, 45-69 or annual 45-69, 40-69 and 40-74 were selected as cost-effective for both effect measures (YL or QALYs). The ICER increases considerably when moving from biennial to annual scenarios. Moving from no screening to biennial 50-69 years represented an ICER of 4,469€ per QALY.

Conclusions

A reduced number of screening strategies have been selected for consideration by researchers, decision makers and policy planners. Mathematical models are useful to assess the impact and costs of BC screening in a specific geographical area.

Absenteeism and short-term disability associated with breast cancer

Few data exist related to the impact of breast cancer on work absenteeism and short-term disability. This retrospective study estimated the extent and costs of breast cancer-associated production loss using a large medical and pharmacy claims database from a US commercially insured population between January 2003 and December 2007. Women aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 2 breast cancer diagnoses within 90 days were selected. Controls were matched to cases based on index date (first breast cancer diagnosis), age, region, employer, and health insurance type. Outcomes were days absent from work and days with short-term disability. Costs were estimated using daily wage rates. 856 and 2,668 patients were selected for absenteeism and short-term disability, respectively, with a mean age of 49 and 50 years. Average number of absenteeism days was 35 and 21, and short-term disability days were 51 and 5, for cases and controls, respectively, within the post-index year (both P < 0.001). Adjusted incremental costs for absenteeism and short-term disability were $1,911 and $6,157 (P < 0.001), respectively, per breast cancer patient per year. This study suggests that breast cancer is associated with work-related productivity loss within the first year of diagnosis that may be a substantial cost to employers.

Out of pocket cost comparison between Caucasian and minority breast cancer survivors in the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI)

The purpose of this article is to: (1) describe out of pocket (OOP) costs among minority and Caucasian participants in the BCEI, the Breast Cancer Education Intervention, a randomized clinical trial of psychoeducational quality of life interventions for breast cancer survivors (BCS); and (2) examine the OOP burden, as measured by the proportion of income spent OOP, between the two racial/ethnic groups. We examined baseline OOP costs reported by 261 early-stage I and II breast cancer survivors who participated in the BCEI trial. Data were collected using the Breast Cancer Finances Survey and the Breast Cancer Sociodemographic and Treatment Tool. OOP costs averaged $316 per month since diagnosis. Direct medical costs were $281, and direct non-medical were $66. There were no significant differences in total OOP costs or direct medical and non-medical OOP costs between minority and Caucasian BCS. Minority BCS with incomes of $40,000 or less spent a greater proportion of income in total OOP and direct medical OOP costs (31.4 and 27% for BCS with incomes ≤ $20,000; 19.5 and 18.8% for BCS with incomes $20,001-40,0000) compared to their Caucasian counterparts (12.6 and 9.2% for BCS with incomes ≤ $20,000; 8.7 and 8.2% for BCS with incomes $20,001-40,0000). OOP costs can be a considerable burden for breast cancer survivors representing as much as 31% of monthly income depending on BCS' income levels. Future studies can investigate how this burden affects the quality of life of breast cancer survivors, especially minorities.

The out of pocket cost of breast cancer survivors: a review

INTRODUCTION

Out of pocket (OOP) costs add to the burden facing breast cancer survivors but remain an understudied area of costs. Current turbulent economic climate increases the urgency to better understand this burden. Few studies or systematic reviews focus on OOP costs.

METHODS

PubMed search was conducted for articles in English containing: (1) MESH terms breast neoplasms and economics, and (2) words "breast cancer" and "cost" or "costs," "expenditure," or "out of pocket." Limits included: publication dates from January 1, 1980 to December 16, 2009, and populations aged > or = 45 years old. Articles were excluded based on title, abstract, and full text reviews. Citation searches and searches of reference lists were also conducted. Three articles were selected for this review.

RESULTS

Medical direct OOP costs (e.g., for physician fees) ranged from $300 to $1,180 per month during active treatment, and were about $500 per month 1 year post diagnosis. Non-medical direct OOP costs (e.g., for transportation to doctor's office, parking etc.) ranged from $137 to $174 per month in the year post diagnosis; and $200-$509 per month 1 year or more after diagnosis. Different types of costs were identified.

CONCLUSION

OOP costs represent a significant burden for survivors even after initial treatment. The nature and extent of OOP costs need further evaluation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

OOP costs are rarely considered. However, as OOP costs affect the well being of cancer survivors, they should be understood more fully and possibly addressed in interventions aimed at improving quality of life.

Quality-of-life and self-esteem outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND

This prospective trial was designed to assess the impact of oncoplastic surgery on quality of life and self-esteem of breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with primary breast cancer to be treated with breast-conserving surgery and immediate partial breast reconstruction were assessed with regard to quality-of-life and self-esteem outcomes preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Another 42 breast cancer patients, treated by conservative surgery without breast reconstruction at least 1 year previously, were assessed for the control group. Validated questionnaires (Short Form-36, Brazilian version, and the Rosenberg-EPM Self-Esteem Scale) were used. Data were analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests.

RESULTS

Participation rates at the follow-up assessments were 95.5 percent at the 6-month follow-up and 88.9 percent at the 12-month follow-up. Control and reconstruction groups were matched for age, body mass index, and demographic and oncologic aspects. At postoperative month 12, the breast reconstruction group had significantly better health status than the control group with regard to physical functioning (p < 0.000), health perception (p < 0.002), vitality (p < 0.007), social functioning (p < 0.02), role emotional (p < 0.02), mental health (p < 0.000), and self-esteem (p < 0.02). Compared with preoperatively, breast reconstruction group scores were significantly higher at 12 months postoperatively for seven of the eight dimensions of the Short Form-36: physical functioning (p < 0.01), role physical (p < 0.02), health perception (p < 0.02), vitality (p < 0.01), social functioning (p < 0.02), role emotional (p < 0.05), and mental health (p < 0.02). Self-esteem was also significantly better at 12 months (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Oncoplastic surgery had a positive impact on quality of life and self-esteem of patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment.