Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy

Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers

PURPOSE

To introduce an educational intervention-specifically, a specialized training course-and perform a formative evaluation of the effect of the intervention on novice reader interpretation of computed tomography (CT) colonographic data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was institutional review board approved. Ten normal and 50 abnormal cases, those of 60 patients with 93 polyps-61 polyps 6-9 mm in diameter and 32 polyps 10 mm or larger-were selected from a previously published trial. Seven novice readers underwent initial training that consisted of a 1-day course, reading assignments, a self-study computer module (with 61 limited data sets), observation of an expert interpreting three cases, and full interpretation of 10 cases with unblinding after each case. After training, the observers independently interpreted 60 cases by means of primary two-dimensional reading with unblinding after each case. For each case, the reading time and the location and maximal diameter of the polyp(s) were recorded. A t test was used to evaluate the observers' improvements, and empirical receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed.

RESULTS

By-patient sensitivities and specificities were determined for each observer. The lowest by-patient sensitivity at the 6 mm or larger polyp threshold was 86%, with 90% specificity. Four observers had 100% by-patient sensitivity at the 10 mm or larger polyp threshold, with 82%-97% specificity. For polyps 10 mm or larger, mean sensitivity and specificity were 98% and 92%, respectively. For the last 20 cases, the average interpretation time per case was 25 minutes. The range of areas under the ROC curve across observers was low: 0.86-0.95.

CONCLUSION

In the described polyp-enriched cohort, novice CT colonographic data readers achieved high sensitivity and good specificity at formative evaluation of a comprehensive training program. Use of a similar comprehensive training method might reduce interreader variability in interpretation accuracy and be useful for reader certification.

Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings

AIM

In this retrospective study, we assess the current role and future potential of computed tomographic (CT) colonography as a viable alternative imaging tool for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients have undergone virtual colonographic examinations with 64-multidetector-row spiral CT (MDCT), and three-dimensional images were created on a separate workstation that had the appropriate software for image processing. Images were reviewed by a radiologist, and anatomic division of the entire colon was used to locate the suspected lesions. Characteristics of bowel preparation, intracolonic, extracolonic, and incidental findings were noted, too.

RESULTS

Ten of the 20 patients (50%) had a positive CT colonography for polypoid lesions. Those lesions were distributed into the cecum (4 cases), colon ascendens (2 cases), colon descendens (2 cases), and sigma (2 cases). In 80%, bowel preparation was good, in 15% moderate, and in 5% inadequate. Furthermore, CT scan noted in total 20 incidental findings.

CONCLUSION

CT colonography is currently a viable alternative imaging tool for colorectal polyp detection. There are several clinical situations where CT colonography may play an important role in patient care. These include for example evaluation of the colon after an incomplete conventional colonoscopic examination or evaluation in patients who are clinically unfit to undergo conventional colonoscopy. At centers where there is expertise in data acquisition and interpretation, CT colonography is being offered as a routine imaging examination. With continued improvements in bowel preparation, colonic distention, and CT colonography interpretation by sufficient numbers of radiologists this technology might have a substantial influence on colon cancer screening.

The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) with that of colonoscopy for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic screening population in Korea, thus to evaluate a possibility, whether CTC could be used as a screening tool for colorectal polyps.

METHODS

A total of 241 asymptomatic adults underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced CTC and colonoscopy successively on the same day. Bowel preparation was performed by 4 L of polyethylene glycol (n=172) or 90 mL of sodium phosphate (n=69). The CTC findings were released to the colonoscopists after the first examination of each segment, a procedure known as segmental unblinded colonoscopy, and were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of CTC for colorectal polyps was calculated.

RESULTS

The per-patient sensitivities of CTC were 68.5% (37/54) and 86.7% (13/15) for polyp > or = 6 and > or = 10 mm, inferior to those of colonoscopy, 92.6% (50/54) and 100% (15/15), respectively. The per-polyp sensitivities of CTC were 60.4% (61/101) and 72.7% (16/22) for polyp > or = 6 and > or = 10 mm, respectively. The low sensitivity of CTC was related with flat morphology. CTC detected only 37.5% (9/24) of flat polyps > or = 6 mm. Bowel preparation by sodium phosphate further decreased the positive predictive value and specificity than by polyethylene glycol.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening by CTC with asymptomatic population was not promising in Korea despite using advanced CT technology (16-row detector). Bowel preparation was one of the key determinants of the specificity of CTC.

Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice

Colorectal cancer, which kills more than 50,000 patients every year in the United States and costs more than $6 billion in direct health costs, is a prime target for cancer prevention. Computed tomography colonography (CTC) has emerged as a minimally invasive, structural examination of the entire colon that can complement the current tools of cancer prevention and may improve patient compliance. Large trials have suggested a sensitivity of roughly 90% and specificity greater than 97% for CTC for patients with polyps >or= 10 mm. Bowel preparation by diet restriction, catharsis, and stool and fluid tagging are typically used. A prepless CTC protocol is an active area of research with a focus on improving patient compliance. Insurance coverage of CTC is a key factor affecting current dissemination and local and national coverage decisions are ongoing. CT examination of the abdomen allows visualization of extracolonic organs, where detection of additional disease must balance any unnecessary anxiety and testing. Estimates of CTC cost-effectiveness are generally favorable, but vary due to the high sensitivity of these models to costs, polyp sensitivity, compliance rates, and other parameters, which are difficult to accurately assess. Quality initiatives are being developed that will be key for implementation into community practice.

Findings on optical colonoscopy after positive CT colonography exam

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the findings on optical colonoscopy (OC) after a positive CT colonography (CTC) exam and characterize the type of polyps seen on OC but not reported by CTC.

METHODS

Over an 18-month period a total of 159 asymptomatic adults had polyps seen on computed tomography colonography examination and subsequently underwent planned therapeutic optical colonoscopy. The colonoscopists were aware of the findings on CT colonography prior to further evaluation of the colon. Characteristics of polyps and adenomas seen on subsequent optical colonoscopy but not seen or reported on CT colonography were examined.

RESULTS

The adenoma miss rate for CT colonography overall was 18.9% (25/132) including 6.2% (4/65) for polyps >9 mm and 18.2% (8/44) for polyps 6-9 mm. Three of the adenomas >9 mm not seen on CTC were sessile, and two were found in patients with technically difficult CT colonography studies due to poor colonic distention. No adenomas with advanced pathology <6 mm were found on optical colonoscopy but not reported on CT colonography. False-positive CTC referral where no polyp was seen on colonoscopy was 5.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

CT colonography has adenoma miss rates similar to miss rates historically found with optical colonoscopy, with most missed adenomas being <10 mm and sessile in shape.

Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed among men and women and the second leading cause of death from cancer. CRC largely can be prevented by the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps, and survival is significantly better when CRC is diagnosed while still localized. In 2006 to 2007, the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology came together to develop consensus guidelines for the detection of adenomatous polyps and CRC in asymptomatic average-risk adults. In this update of each organization's guidelines, screening tests are grouped into those that primarily detect cancer early and those that can detect cancer early and also can detect adenomatous polyps, thus providing a greater potential for prevention through polypectomy. When possible, clinicians should make patients aware of the full range of screening options, but at a minimum they should be prepared to offer patients a choice between a screening test that primarily is effective at early cancer detection and a screening test that is effective at both early cancer detection and cancer prevention through the detection and removal of polyps. It is the strong opinion of these 3 organizations that colon cancer prevention should be the primary goal of screening.

Computed tomographic colonography: clinical value

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has the potential to reliably detect polyps in the colon. Its clinical value is accepted for several indications. The main target is screening asymptomatic people for colorectal cancer (CRC). As in large multi-centre trials controversial results were obtained, acceptance of this indication on a large scale is still pending. Agreement exists that in experienced hands screening can be performed with CTC. This emphasizes the importance of adequate and intensive training. Besides this, other problems have to be solved. A low complication profile is mandatory. Perforation rate is very low. Ultra-low dose radiation should be used. When screening large patient cohorts, CTC will need a time-efficient and cost-effective management without too many false positives and additional exploration. Can therefore a cut-off size of polyp detection safely be installed? Is the flat lesion an issue? Can extra-colonic findings be treated efficiently? A positive relationship with the gastro-enterologists will improve the act of screening. Improvements of scanning technique and software with dose reduction, improved 3D visualisation methods and CAD are steps in the good direction. Finally, optimisation of laxative-free CTC could be invaluable in the development of CTC as a screening tool for CRC.

CT colonography: computer-aided detection of morphologically flat T1 colonic carcinoma

The purpose was to evaluate the ability of computer-aided detection (CAD) software to detect morphologically flat early colonic carcinoma using CT colonography (CTC). Twenty-four stage T1 colonic carcinomas endoscopically classified as flat (width over twice height) were accrued from patients undergoing staging CTC. Tumor location was annotated by three experienced radiologists in consensus aided by the endosocpic report. CAD software was then applied at three settings of sphericity (0, 0.75, and 1). Computer prompts were categorized as either true positive (overlapping tumour boundary) or false positive. True positives were subclassified as focal or non focal. The 24 cancers were endoscopically classified as type IIa (n=11) and type IIa+IIc (n=13). Mean size (range) was 27 mm (7-70 mm). CAD detected 20 (83.3%), 17 (70.8%), and 13 (54.1%) of the 24 cancers at filter settings of 0, 0.75, and 1, respectively with 3, 4, and 8 missed cancers of type IIa, respectively. The mean total number of false-positive CAD marks per patient at each filter setting was 36.5, 21.1, and 9.5, respectively, excluding polyps. At all settings, >96.1% of CAD true positives were classified as focal. CAD may be effective for the detection of morphologically flat cancer, although minimally raised laterally spreading tumors remain problematic.

Sporadic and syndromic hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas of the colon: classification, molecular genetics, natural history, and clinical management

There is now strong evidence for an alternative pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis implicating hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas. This article briefly reviews the evidence for this serrated pathway, provides diagnostic criteria for clinically significant hyperplastic polyps and allied serrated polyps, and suggests how this information may be translated into safe, effective guidelines for colonoscopy-based colon cancer prevention. Consideration also is given to the definition and management of hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. The currently proposed management plan for serrated polyps is tentative because of incomplete knowledge of the nature and behavior of these polyps. This article highlights key areas warranting further research.

CT colonography: current status and future promise

CT colonography (CTC) is an innovative technology that entails CT examination of the entire colon and computerized processing of the raw data after colon cleansing and colonic distention. CTC could potentially increase the screening rate for colon cancer because of its relative safety, relatively low expense, and greater patient acceptance, but its role in mass colon cancer screening is controversial because of its highly variable sensitivity, the inability to sample polyps for histologic analysis, and lack of therapeutic capabilities. This article reviews the CTC literature, including imaging and adjunctive techniques, radiologic interpretation, procedure indications, contraindications, risks, sensitivity, interpretation pitfalls, and controversies.

Screening CT colonography: how I do it

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to detail an approach to CT colonographic screening that has evolved at one institution.

CONCLUSION

CT colonography is a rapidly advancing technology that has great potential for addressing a deadly but preventable disease-colorectal carcinoma. CT colonography is ideally suited for widespread screening of asymptomatic adults and has become an integral component of the screening efforts at my institution since local third-party coverage was initiated.

Virtual vs. optical colonoscopy in symptomatic gastroenterology out-patients: the case for virtual imaging followed by targeted diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy

AIM

To compare virtual colonoscopy with optical colonoscopy findings in symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND

Computer tomographic colonography is an alternative to optical colonoscopy. Studies have shown that two-dimensional computer tomographic colonography does not have sufficient sensitivity. Three-dimensional computerized tomographic virtual colonoscopy compares well with optical colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening in asymptomatic individuals.

METHODS

One hundred patients aged 50 and older underwent same day virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy. The endoscopists were unaware of the radiologist's report until the withdrawal phase of the endoscopy when segmental unblinding occurred. The virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy findings were compared by using the unblinded optical colonoscopy as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Pancolonic endoluminal virtual colonoscopy was achieved in 99 patients. Optical colonoscopy caecal intubation occurred in 91 patients. Direct comparison was possible in 90 patients. Both techniques revealed the three cancers detected. Virtual colonoscopy revealed 11 polyps > or = 6 mm diameter in nine patients. Optical colonoscopy revealed 10 polyps > or = 6 mm diameter in nine patients with a further 15-mm polyp discovered after segmental unblinding.

CONCLUSION

In symptomatic patients, three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy is equivalent to optical colonoscopy for diagnosing colon cancer and clinically significant polyps. A case can be made for three-dimensional virtual colonoscopy as a primary modality followed if necessary by same day-targeted optical colonoscopy.

Two- versus Three-dimensional Colon Evaluation with Recently Developed Virtual Dissection Software for CT Colonography

This retrospective study was institutional review board approved; the requirement for informed patient consent was waived. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare a two-dimensional (2D) data interpretation technique with a three-dimensional (3D) colon dissection technique in terms of interpretation time and sensitivity for colonic polyp detection, with colonoscopy as the reference standard. Ninety-six patients (56 men, 40 women; mean age, 54.8 years) underwent colonoscopy and multidetector computed tomographic (CT) colonography on the same day. Two radiologists independently analyzed the data on a per-polyp and per-patient basis. The sensitivity of both approaches was compared by using the McNemar test. The time required to interpret CT colonographic data with each technique was also assessed. Compared with the conventional 2D colonic polyp detection method, primary 3D interpretation with use of virtual dissection software for CT colonography revealed comparable per-polyp (77% and 69% for two readers) and per-patient (77% and 73% for two readers) sensitivities and comparable per-patient specificity (99% and 89% for two readers) for the detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger and involved a shorter interpretation time.

Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to develop a Hessian matrix-based computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for polyp detection on CT colonography (CTC) and to analyze its performance in a high-risk population.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The CTC data sets of 35 patients with at least one colonoscopically proven polyp were interpreted with a Hessian matrix-based CAD algorithm, which was designed to depict bloblike structures protruding into the lumen. Our gold standard was a combination of segmental unblinded optical colonoscopy and retrospective unblinded consensus review by two radiologists. Sensitivity of CAD for polyp detection was evaluated on both per-polyp and per-patient bases. The average number of false-positive detections was calculated, and the causes of false-positives and false-negatives were analyzed.

RESULTS

Ninety-four polyps were identified on colonoscopy. Forty-six polyps were smaller than 6 mm and 48 were 6 mm or larger. Seventy-five (79.8%) of these 94 polyps were identified by radiologists in a retrospective review. When colonoscopy was used as a standard of reference, the sensitivity of CAD was 77.1% for polyps 6 mm or larger. For large polyps (> or = 6 mm) that could be identified on retrospective review, the CAD algorithm achieved sensitivities of 92.5% (37/40) and 91.7% (22/24), respectively, on per-polyp and per-patient bases. There were an average of 5.5 false-positive detections per patient and 3.1 false-positive detections per data set for CAD. The two most frequent causes of false-positives on CAD were prominent or converging fold (78/191) and feces (50/191). Of the three polyps 6 mm or larger that were missed by CAD, two had a flat appearance on colonoscopy and the remaining one was located in the narrow area between the rectal tube and the rectal wall.

CONCLUSION

A Hessian matrix-based CAD algorithm for CTC has the potential to depict polyps larger than or equal to 6 mm with high sensitivity and an acceptable false-positive rate.

CT colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

Virtual colonoscopy is used worldwide for the detection of colon polyps, but this technique has not been used much for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases. The advent of multidetector-computed tomography and the use of high quality 3D and virtual images opened up the opportunity to assess these patients with this non-invasive technique. Early and late colonic changes are illustrated.

Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance

OBJECTIVE

Advanced adenomas are the primary target in colorectal screening. The purpose of this study was to delineate the prevalence and imaging characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at screening CT colonography (CTC) and the rates of invasive carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia for various polyp size categories. These observations may be a basis for formulation of polypectomy thresholds and CTC surveillance strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The imaging and pathologic findings for polyps measuring 6 mm or more obtained from a CTC screening population of 3,536 persons during a 32-month period were retrospectively reviewed. From this group, prevalence, size, histologic features, morphologic features, and location of advanced adenomas were tabulated. Advanced adenomas were defined by size (> or = 10 mm) and/or histologic findings (prominent villous component or high-grade dysplasia).

RESULTS

A total of 123 (38.3%) of 321 adenomas measuring 6 mm or more were classified as advanced, the overall prevalence being 3.1% (111 of 3,536 patients). The mean size of advanced adenomas was 16.6 +/- 11.6 mm; most of the lesions (116/123, 94.3%) qualified as advanced on the basis of the size criterion alone. The seven lesions measuring 6-9 mm constituted 3.4% (7/205) of all medium-sized adenomas. The largest percentage (65/123, 52.8%) of the advanced adenomas had tubular histologic features, followed by tubulovillous (50/123, 40.6%), villous (5/123, 4.1%), and serrated (3/123, 2.4%) histologic features. High-grade dysplasia was uncommon (6/123, 4.9%), typically occurring in large lesions. Seven cases of cancer were detected, all lesions measuring 10 mm or more in size. The majority of advanced adenomas were classified as sessile (57/123, 46.3%) or pedunculated (57/123, 46.3%); a small percentage were flat (9/123, 7.3%). Advanced adenomas were located in the proximal colon in 43.9% (54/123) and distal colon in 56.1% (69/123) of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Advanced adenomas were generally large (> or = 10 mm in size); only a small percentage were medium sized (6-9 mm). There was a very low prevalence of high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in this series, particularly in the medium-sized group of lesions. These findings lend support to the practice of CTC screening in which large polyp size is used as a surrogate measure for the possible presence of advanced histologic features and medium-sized lesions are followed with noninvasive surveillance protocols.

Flat Colorectal Neoplasms: Definition, Importance, and Visualization on CT Colonography

OBJECTIVE

We discuss the definition of flat colorectal neoplasms, their clinical importance, CT colonography (CTC) findings, techniques for better visualization on CTC, and diagnostic pitfalls of such lesions.

CONCLUSION

Flat lesions appear on CTC as plaque-shaped mucosal elevations with or without a central depression, thickened haustral folds, and nodular mucosal surfaces. The sensitivity and optimal techniques of CTC for the detection of flat lesions have not yet been established. Three-dimensional endoluminal fly-through may be helpful for lesion detection. Fecal tagging helps in the distinction of true flat lesions from feces. I.v. contrast enhancement and the review with intermediate soft-tissue window settings, although not routinely used for CTC, may also help lesion visualization.

Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography

Our purpose was to assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on lesion detection as a second reader in computed tomographic colonography, and to compare the influence of CAD on the performance of readers with different levels of expertise. Fifty-two CT colonography patient data-sets (37 patients: 55 endoscopically confirmed polyps > or =0.5 cm, seven cancers; 15 patients: no abnormalities) were retrospectively reviewed by four radiologists (two expert, two nonexpert). After primary data evaluation, a second reading augmented with findings of CAD (polyp-enhanced view, Siemens) was performed. Sensitivities and reading time were calculated for each reader without CAD and supported by CAD findings. The sensitivity of expert readers was 91% each, and of nonexpert readers, 76% and 75%, respectively, for polyp detection. CAD increased the sensitivity of expert readers to 96% (P = 0.25) and 93% (P = 1), and that of nonexpert readers to 91% (P = 0.008) and 95% (P = 0.001), respectively. All four readers diagnosed 100% of cancers, but CAD alone only 43%. CAD increased reading time by 2.1 min (mean). CAD as a second reader significantly improves sensitivity for polyp detection in a high disease prevalence population for nonexpert readers. CAD causes a modest increase in reading time. CAD is of limited value in the detection of cancer.

CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): A Practical Approach for Population Screening

CT colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, is a minimally invasive test for the detection of colorectal polyps and masses. At the authors' institution, asymptomatic screening has been the overwhelming indication for CTC referral since local third-party coverage was initiated in April 2004. This practical review details the authors' current approach to CTC screening, which has evolved and matured over time. It discusses the entire spectrum from program set-up through patient disposition following CTC examination. The authors hope this article will provide a roadmap for radiologists who wish to institute a CTC screening program.

Flat elevated lesions of the colon and rectum: a spectrum of neoplastic and nonneoplastic entities

The aim of this prospective study is to establish the frequency and the type (neoplastic and nonneoplastic) lesions defined endoscopically as flat elevated lesion (FEL) in the colon and rectum, as well as to compare flat adenomas (FAs) to polypoid lesions of the same size with morphometric and immunohistochemical analysis. One hundred nineteen patients were studied through fibrocolonoscopy with chromoscopy (indigo carmine spray). All detected lesions (total of 195) were removed, and FELs measuring 10 mm or smaller were also selected. Using histopathologic criteria, they were divided in neoplastic (adenomas and carcinomas) and nonneoplastic ones. In neoplastic lesions, the following parameters were evaluated to compare FAs with polypoid lesions: morphometric studies with Index of Structural Atypia (ISA) and Stratification Index (SI), evaluation of cellular proliferation with label index of Ki-67, and expression of p53 protein. Of 195 lesions resected, only 33 (17%) met the endoscopic requirements for FELs. Twelve (36.4%) were neoplastic and 21 (63.6%) considered nonneoplastic. Among the FAs, there were a percentage of high-grade (severe dysplasia) significantly more frequent than observed in polypoid lesions (16.7% vs 2.6%). In addition, the SI, Ki-67 label index and p53 positivity were significantly higher in FAs. The ISA also reached significant differences between both groups of adenomas. Non-neoplastic FELs included different entities such as hyperplasic polyps, focuses of colitis, normal mucosa, and scars. The endoscopic elements analyzed were shared between nonneoplastic FELs and FAs. A central depression, when air was properly insufflated, considered typical in neoplastic lesions, was frequently observed in nonneoplastic lesions. Following the endoscopic criteria of FELs, nonneoplastic lesions predominated over the adenomatous lesions, demonstrating that FELs and FAs are not homologous terms. The frequency of high-grade dysplasia was significantly more elevated in the adenomatous FELs than in polypoid adenomas. The ISA, SI, p53 expression, and Ki-67 label index were helpful in differentiating adenomatous FELs from polypoid lesions. Flat elevated lesions selected by endoscopic criteria are, in fact, a heterogeneous population of lesions.

Perceptive errors in CT colonography

Published results to date have indicated a good per patient sensitivity of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer and for polyps measuring 10 mm or more together with a very good specificity. Sensitivity and specificity for polyps in the range of 6-10 mm are moderate. These results, however, can be achieved only with meticulous attention to technique including adequate colonic distention, and acquisition of supine and prone thin-section computed tomographic (CT) images. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve involved in the interpretation of CTC studies, with performance statistics improving with operator experience. Radiologists must be comfortable in reporting directly from workstation monitors and have access to and be familiar with software for multiplanar and endoluminal reconstructions. In addition to maximize polyp detection and minimize false positive results, reporting radiologists must have a working knowledge of normal colorectal anatomy and pathology on CTC and be familiar with potential pitfalls in interpretation. Besides the description of several possible causes for perceptive errors, also a literature search of perceptive errors in CTC is included in this paper.

Will screening colonoscopy disappear and transform gastroenterology practice? Threats to clinical practice and recommendations to reduce their impact: report of a consensus conference conducted by the AGA Institute Future Trends Committee

The AGA Institute Future Trends Committee (FTC) developed this report based on a consensus conference it convened on April 1-2, 2006, in Washington, DC. The report was prepared for the FTC by Carol Regueiro, MD, a medical writer under contract to the AGA Institute, and Michael Stolar, PhD, staff liaison to the FTC. It was approved by the FTC on July 12, 2006, and accepted by the AGA Institute Governing Board on July 22, 2006. This report reflects the panel's assessment of information available at the time of the conference. Readers should view this report in the context of data that will continue to accumulate and facts that may change after its creation.

Virtual colonoscopy--an overview

Virtual colonoscopy is emerging as a technique for the detection of tumor lesions in the colon. Being a patient-friendly examination, virtual colonoscopy could play an important role in colorectal cancer screening. This article reviews the current state of the art of virtual colonoscopy with future developments and issues to be resolved.

Occult colorectal polyps on CT colonography: implications for surveillance

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of polyps that are invisible on CT colonography (CTC) in a population previously screened for colorectal neoplasms. Differences in the prevalence of occult polyps in various populations might help explain the discordant reported sensitivities for polyp detection in published reports of CTC.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients who had been previously screened for polyps underwent same-day colonoscopy and CTC. Many of the patients had personal histories of previous polypectomies and were undergoing surveillance colonoscopy. The scans were interpreted prospectively by an experienced radiologist. Polyps missed prospectively on CTC were analyzed retrospectively by three experienced radiologists and categorized as perception errors (visible in retrospect), technical errors (e.g., obscured by feces or fluid), or occult (invisible).

RESULTS

Thirty polyps 5 mm or larger were found at colonoscopy, 18 of which were missed prospectively on CTC. Of the 18 missed polyps, 12 could not be identified in retrospect, even though they were located in clean, dry, well-distended colonic segments. These were classified as occult. Ten of the 12 occult polyps showed flat morphology on review of colonoscopy video recordings. Of the remaining six missed polyps, two were classified as perception errors, two as technical errors, and two as a combination of technical and perception error.

CONCLUSION

In this population, colonographically occult polyps were common and accounted for more detection failures than perception errors and technical errors combined. The high prevalence of occult polyps may be explained by the fact that previous screening may have led to removal of easy-to-see polyps, creating a study population with a higher percentage of hard-to-see polyps.

Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography--preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the ability of contrast-enhanced, 16-MDCT colonography to display flat colonic lesions when a very narrow slice thickness (1 mm) is used.

CONCLUSION

Less than 50% of flat lesions in our population could be visualized by blinded and unblinded review. Before they could be visualized, flat lesions were 2 mm or greater in height and 7 mm or greater in diameter. Lesions with a height of 1 mm or less were not seen on CT colonography. Contrast enhancement, location on a haustral fold, and abnormal 2D and 3D morphology contributed to lesion conspicuity.

CT colonography with intravenous contrast material: varied appearances of colorectal carcinoma

Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasive, rapidly evolving technique that has been shown in some studies to be comparable with conventional colonoscopy for the screening of colorectal cancer. Because colorectal cancer has a widely varying appearance at both endoscopy and CT colonography, familiarity with the gamut of morphologic appearances can help improve interpretation of the results. The addition of intravenous contrast material to CT colonography can aid differentiation of true colonic masses from pseudolesions such as residual stool and improves the depiction of enhancing masses that might otherwise be obscured by residual colonic fluid. In contrast to staging of most other tumors, staging of colorectal carcinoma depends more on the depth of tumor invasion than on the size of the primary mass. The diverse appearances of colorectal cancers at two- and three-dimensional CT colonography include sessile, annular, ulcerated, necrotic, mucinous, invasive, and noninvasive lesions. Imaging pitfalls that can simulate or obscure neoplasms are retained fecal material or fluid, incomplete distention, and advanced diverticulosis.

Computed tomography colonography: current issues

OBJECTIVE

Direct and indirect evidence supports the concept of screening for adenomas and early stage colorectal cancer in reducing the incidence and disease-specific mortality. Controversy remains as to the appropriateness of and preferred methods for screening an asymptomatic population.

METHODS

Review of computed tomography (CT) colonography based on the literature and personal experience.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Current discrepancies in the data on accuracy and patient acceptance of CT colonography reflect differences in the performance and evaluation of this examination. Before CT colonography can be implemented in colorectal cancer screening, factors that cause this variability must be elucidated. Studies in which high-resolution scanning, three-dimensional review methods and an enhanced colonoscopic reference are used achieve an accuracy that is similar to colonoscopy. At the same time the evidence that ultra-low radiation dose CT colonography is feasible is mounting, a development that dramatically reduces one of the largest obstacles for large-scale application of this technique.

Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of polyp measurement at computed tomographic (CT) colonography by using two-dimensional (2D) multiplanar reformation (MPR) and three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal displays obtained both in a colon phantom and at clinical examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and all patients provided signed informed consent, both of which allowed for additional retrospective evaluation. Two-dimensional and 3D CT colonography displays were generated from data obtained in an in vitro colon phantom that contained 10 6-13-mm synthetic polyps and from data obtained at in vivo clinical CT colonography examinations performed in 10 patients (five men, five women; mean age, 56.3 years) with proved polyps (size range, 7-25 mm). The reference standard for in vivo polyp size was optical colonoscopic measurement with a calibrated linear probe. Polyps were measured at CT colonography with 2D MPR and 3D endoluminal displays and electronic calipers by four radiologists who were unaware of the reference size measurements. The largest of the three 2D MPR measurements was considered the "optimized" 2D projection. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed rank, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and paired t testing.

RESULTS

For the phantom, the mean errors (differences between actual polyp size and that measured at CT colonography) for 2D transverse, 2D coronal, and 3D endoluminal displays were 1.6 mm +/- 0.8 (standard deviation), 1.4 mm +/- 0.7, and 0.8 mm +/- 0.5, respectively. For in vivo polyp measurements, the mean errors for 2D transverse, 2D coronal, 2D sagittal, and 3D displays were 4.4 mm +/- 3.5, 3.8 mm +/- 3.3, 4.6 mm +/- 3.0, and 1.9 mm +/- 1.6, respectively. The 2D measurements underestimated actual polyp sizes in all cases. The differences in mean errors between 2D MPR and 3D endoluminal measurements were significant (P < .05). When the optimized 2D view was considered for in vivo measurement, the mean error decreased to 3.0 mm +/- 2.6 (P = .2).

CONCLUSION

Linear polyp measurement on 3D endoluminal views was significantly more accurate than measurement on 2D transverse, coronal, or sagittal views, both in vitro and in vivo, for the CT colonography system evaluated. Use of the optimized 2D view substantially reduced 2D measurement error and may be valuable when used in conjunction with 3D measurement.

The role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a relatively noninvasive technique for large bowel imaging that has the ability to detect colorectal neoplasia. Already well established as a reliable diagnostic tool in symptomatic patients who are unable to undergo complete colonoscopy, it is now being considered as a viable method for population screening. Advances in technique over the past 10 yr make this an attractive alternative, including reduced bowel preparation and stool tagging, three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction, computer-aided detection software, and low-radiation dose protocols. CTC may be favored by patients compared to other available screening tests due to the ease of performance and comfort. Although published studies vary in relation to the sensitivity of this test for the detection of polyps, in the best hands a sensitivity of greater than 90% for detection of polyps at least 10 mm in diameter may be obtained. Although not yet endorsed for widespread use by major gastroenterological societies, CTC shows promise as a screening tool.

Colonography by computed tomography

Computed tomographic colonography ('virtual colonoscopy') has shown promising results in the detection of large (> or = 10 mm) polyps in populations with a high prevalence of polyps. Recent studies in low prevalence populations, however, show variable results in sensitivity, ranging from 55% to 94% for the detection of patients with polyps measuring 10 mm or longer. Therefore questions have been raised about computed tomographic colonography as a screening method, probably the most valuable use of this technique. This article describes possible causes of these remarkable differences as well as advances in computed tomographic colonography.